Protocol Choices Matter More Than the Aggregation Algorithm: Federated Learning for In-Hospital Mortality Prediction in Care-Unit and Multi-Hospital Federations

Background: This study aims to develop and validate federated learning models for predicting major postoperative complications and mortality using a large multicenter dataset from the OneFlorida Data Trust. We hypothesize that federated learning models will offer robust generalizability while preserving data privacy and security. Methods: This retrospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study included 358,644 adult patients admitted to five healthcare institutions, who underwent 494,163 inpatient major surgical procedures from 2012-2023. We developed and internally and externally validated federated learning models to predict the postoperative risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation (MV) therapy, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital mortality. These models were compared with local models trained on data from a single center and central models trained on a pooled dataset from all centers. Performance was primarily evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) values. Results: Our federated learning models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with AUROC scores consistently comparable or superior performance in terms of AUROC and AUPRC across all outcomes and sites. Our federated learning models also demonstrated strong generalizability, with comparable or superior performance in terms of both AUROC and AUPRC compared to the best local learning model at each site. Conclusions: By leveraging multicenter data, we developed robust, generalizable, and privacy-preserving predictive models for major postoperative complications and mortality. These findings support the feasibility of federated learning in clinical decision support systems.

Recent reviews find that the vast majority of published healthcare federated learning (FL) studies never reach real-world deployment. We developed an embedding-based FL pipeline for iron deficiency prediction from routine full blood count (FBC) data and deployed it across real institutional environments at Amsterdam University Medical Centre (AUMC) and NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), two clinical environments that differ markedly in iron deficiency prevalence, ferritin distribution, and subject populations. A frozen domain-specific haematology foundation model, DeepCBC, performs site-local representation extraction, restricting federated training to a compact downstream classifier and substantially reducing recurrent communication relative to full-encoder federation. The two clinical datasets are structurally not independent and identically distributed (non-IID), with heterogeneity arising from distinct population differences rather than sampling artefacts. Runtime governance is enforced by FLA$^3$, a healthcare-oriented FL platform providing study-scoped execution, policy-based authorisation, and signed audit logging. Standard sample-size-weighted aggregation (FedAvg) reduced the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at both sites relative to local-only training, as the global update was biased towards the larger AUMC distribution. FedMAP, a personalised aggregation method, raised ROC-AUC from 0.9470 to 0.9594 at AUMC and from 0.8558 to 0.8671 at NHSBT relative to local-only training, achieving the highest macro ROC-AUC of 0.9133 and the best macro balanced accuracy overall. These results support personalised aggregation in clinical federations where client sample size and task relevance diverge substantially.

Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data, but its effectiveness for survival modeling under realistic, heterogeneous conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper presents a systematic, multi-model evaluation of federated survival analysis on a cross-institutional breast cancer cohort with naturally heterogeneous distributed clients. Three representative survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training, and three federated optimization strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, and FedAdam) are assessed for the gradient-based models. Results show that FL consistently outperforms local training and approaches, and occasionally exceeds, centralized performance, while RSF offers the best overall balance of discrimination, calibration, and robustness across heterogeneous clients. We further find that performance depends on the diversity of client distributions, and that FedAvg and FedProx are stronger and more stable than FedAdam. Based on these findings, we derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices for federated survival modeling in healthcare.