cs.CVOct 15, 2026

International Multi-Centre Validation of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Precise Discrimination between Normal and Abnormal Retinal Development

Authors: Zhanhan Tu, Nikhil Reddy, Helen J. Kuht, Ha-Jun Yoon, Gail D. E. Maconachie, Ravi Purohit, Prateek Pani, Line Kessel, 

Organizations: The University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK · International Institute of Information Technology, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 500 032, India · inAmind Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK. · Academic Unit of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK · 

Abstract

Arrested retinal development can cause childhood visual impairment, but grading optical coherence tomography scans is difficult to standardise across devices and centres. We developed and evaluated an unsupervised domain adaptation model to classify normal and abnormal retinal development across different OCT systems. This retrospective multicentre study used OCT scans from five centres in four countries and the UK Biobank. Data covered four OCT devices, including table mounted and handheld systems. A ResNet50 based Domain Adversarial Neural Network was trained using labelled images from a source device and unlabelled images from a target device. We evaluated six source to target pairings and compared model performance with seven clinician graders. A separate Heidelberg Spectralis dataset was reserved for external evaluation. Across validation sets, accuracy ranged from 87.75% to 96.06%, sensitivity from 88.68% to 98.38%, and specificity from 78.00% to 98.02%. The best performing model, adapted from TM OCT1 to HH OCT1, achieved 96.06% accuracy and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.994, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.981 to 0.999. Several models also maintained discrimination on the unseen Heidelberg device. Unsupervised domain adaptation enabled OCT classification across devices without labelled target device data. The approach may support more consistent assessment of retinal development and large scale analysis of existing imaging datasets.

Explore similar work

Apr 24, 2026

Anatomy-Aware Unsupervised Detection and Localization of Retinal Abnormalities in Optical Coherence Tomography

Reliable automated analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging is crucial for diagnosing retinal disorders but faces a critical barrier: the need for expensive, labor-intensive expert annotations. Supervised deep learning models struggle to generalize across diverse pathologies, imaging devices, and patient populations due to their restricted vocabulary of annotated abnormalities. We propose an unsupervised anomaly detection framework that learns the normative distribution of healthy retinal anatomy without lesion annotations, directly addressing annotation efficiency challenges in clinical deployment. Our approach leverages a discrete latent model trained on normal B-scans to capture OCT-specific structural patterns. To enhance clinical robustness, we incorporate retinal layer-aware supervision and structured triplet learning to separate healthy from pathological representations, improving model reliability across varied imaging conditions. During inference, anomalies are detected and localized via reconstruction discrepancies, enabling both image and pixel-level identification without requiring disease-specific labels. On the Kermany dataset (AUROC: 0.799), our method substantially outperforms VAE, VQVAE, VQGAN, and f-AnoGAN baselines. Critically, cross-dataset evaluation on Srinivasan achieves AUROC 0.884 with superior generalization, demonstrating robust domain adaptation. On the external RETOUCH benchmark, unsupervised anomaly segmentation achieves competitive Dice (0.200) and mIoU (0.117) scores, validating reproducibility across institutions.
Jul 9, 2026

Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Source Retinal Fluid Segmentation in OCT

Measuring retinal fluid from optical coherence tomography (OCT) drives treatment decisions in macular disease, but manual annotation is slow and segmentation models trained on one scanner degrade on another. We present an attention-guided TransUNet that segments three fluid types across four independent OCT sources, combining a domain-adaptive normalisation scheme with an uncertainty estimate that flags unreliable pixels. The model reaches a mean fluid Dice of 0.78, and -- most usefully for clinicians -- its uncertainty is 1.34x higher exactly where expert graders disagree (p<10^-4), turning a raw segmentation map into an actionable clinical triage signal.
Aug 14, 2026

TRIAGE: Risk-Controlled Pseudo-Label Admission for Annotation-Efficient Semi-Supervised Retinal OCT Classification

The advanced retinal disease diagnosing imaging modality, optical coherence tomography (OCT), encounters a lack of automation because of the high expenses for annotations performed by specialists. The use of SSL solves the problem of insufficient annotations using unlabeled B-scans; however, most of the current techniques for generating pseudo-labels are based on prediction confidence without considering the asymmetry between different types of errors. This paper proposes TRIAGE, a risk-controlled semi-supervised framework for OCT scans classification, which uses the concept of a patient-level conformal risk controller with an asymmetric cost matrix. TRIAGE unites three crucial modules: a hierarchical classifier that is capable of working with partially abnormal supervision of the disease subtypes, a patient-grouped conformal risk controller with primal-dual coverage control, and a context-aware Transformer teacher for cross-slice verification. On the dataset from Noor Eye Hospital (16,822 B-scans, 161 patients, and 554 volumes) with a test set of unseen patients, TRIAGE demonstrates 89.66% scan-level accuracy, 0.8805 macro-F1, 0.9641 macro-AUC, and an 8.34% under-grading rate when using only 20% of the labeled data. With only 5% of the labeled data, TRIAGE keeps 76.88% accuracy and a 0.1656 under-grading rate. Compared with the other six state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods, TRIAGE significantly outperforms them with ablation study demonstrating the contribution of each module in the overall framework performance (by 42.7% in terms of under-grading rate comparing to fixed threshold methods). TRIAGE demonstrates 98.00% accuracy for 3-class classification with 1% labeled data and 95.94% accuracy for 8-class classification with 10% labeled data on the OCT-C8 dataset.