Collaborative AI agents for autonomous experimental research with solid-state quantum spins

We implement an agentic AI workflow built around a large language model (LLM) agent for autonomous experiments with nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. NV centers are a widely used platform for quantum sensing, and the ability to control many measurements from a computer makes NV experiments a natural setting for autonomous workflows. We make two main contributions. First, we demonstrate an autonomous NV experiment workflow that combines persistent project records, quantitative calculation and data analysis tools, and deterministic experiment control. In one autonomous experiment, the agent selected a single NV center, calibrated its resonant frequency, measured $T_2^\ast$ with Ramsey measurements, and added a Carr--Purcell--Meiboom--Gill (CPMG) measurement to check a weak feature that could be related to nearby $^{13}\mathrm{C}$. Second, we introduce two offline benchmarks that evaluate the agent's reasoning separately from laboratory execution. We evaluated both benchmarks with GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. In the Ramsey checkpoint benchmark, greater reasoning effort generally improved recognition of a residual resonance calibration offset. By contrast, in the pulsed optically detected magnetic resonance (pODMR) data evaluation benchmark, pulse sequence information alone produced more false positive resonance judgments at higher reasoning effort. Requiring an expected signal calculation kept false positive rates low across all three models and reasoning settings. The results suggest a clear division of labor for autonomous experiments. The agent forms scientific hypotheses and uses quantitative tools to evaluate data, while deterministic code controls the hardware and enforces safety constraints.

Large language model agents have begun to carry out laboratory measurements, but their scientific conclusions are useful only if they hold up under scrutiny. Demonstrating this requires controlled studies because models are stochastic and the context a model is given steers its conclusions. Here we introduce HERA, an autonomous agent designed to carry out cryogenic transport measurements of quantum devices. HERA draws on a knowledge base curated by lab members that holds measurement protocols, software tools, and literature references. We assessed HERA with a blinded trial against an expert on the stacking order of two multilayer graphene devices, an ablation of its knowledge base, and hundreds of offline replays in which models designed the trial's central measurement without running it. HERA's conclusions matched the expert's sealed conclusions on both tested devices. The ablation and the replay studies measured the impact of the knowledge base across different models, showing that with it every model designed better measurements and reasoned more soundly. To test how readily HERA extends to a new problem, we tasked it with finding and characterizing superconductivity in a different material system. This required a few hours of expert time to develop a new experimental protocol, after which HERA did both autonomously. These results show that, with a knowledge base designed for the task, language model agents are capable of sound experimental science.

We present Claw AI Lab, a lab-native autonomous research platform that advances automated research from a hidden prompt-to-paper pipeline into an interactive AI laboratory. Rather than centering the system around a single agent or a fixed serial workflow, we allow users to instantiate a full research team from one prompt, with customizable roles, collaborative workflows, real-time monitoring, artifact inspection, and rollback/resume control through a unified dashboard. The platform also supports distinct research modes for exploration, multi-agent discussion, and reproduction, making autonomous research substantially more steerable and laboratory-like in practice. A key practical contribution of Claw AI Lab lies in its Claw-Code Harness, which connects local codebases, datasets, and checkpoints to runnable experiments and feeds execution artifacts back into the research loop. As a result, the harness improves not only execution integration, but also experimental completion and result integrity: experiments are easier to inspect, iterate on, and faithfully transfer into final papers, reducing common failure modes such as partial runs and malformed result reporting. In our internal evaluation on five AI research case studies, using AutoResearchClaw as the baseline, Claw AI Lab is consistently preferred by AI expert judges on idea novelty, experiment completeness, and paper presentation quality. We view Claw AI Lab as an early step toward a new paradigm: autonomous research as usable, interactive, and reliability-aware scientific infrastructure.