Continual Learning for LLMs
LLM: Large Language Model
Overview
The field investigates how large language models can keep learning through continual pretraining, instruction tuning, alignment, and personalization without losing earlier knowledge or skills. Common approaches include replaying old or generated examples, distillation and regularization, selective or orthogonal parameter updates, modular adapters, and external memories that leave the model weights unchanged. Evaluations use sequential task suites such as TRACE and SuperNI, domain streams such as biomedical NLP, and evolving knowledge or user-interaction settings, measuring both new-task performance and retention over time. No single approach works reliably across settings: results depend on task order, model capacity, and update type, while long-term evaluation must balance adaptation, forgetting, transfer, safety, and compute cost.
Latest papers
236 papers44 papers in the last four weeks, up 110% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
HiP-LoRA: Budgeted Spectral Plasticity for Robust Low-Rank Adaptation
SafeAnchor: Preventing Cumulative Safety Erosion in Continual Domain Adaptation of Large Language Models
Beyond Meta-Reasoning: Metacognitive Consolidation for Self-Improving LLM Reasoning
Continual Safety Alignment via Gradient-Based Sample Selection
Efficient Task Adaptation in Large Language Models via Selective Parameter Optimization
JumpLoRA: Sparse Adapters for Continual Learning in Large Language Models
Why Fine-Tuning Encourages Hallucinations and How to Fix It
Discovering Novel LLM Experts via Task-Capability Coevolution
Parameter Importance is Not Static: Evolving Parameter Isolation for Supervised Fine-Tuning
HiEdit: Lifelong Model Editing with Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
In-Place Test-Time Training
train then deploy" paradigm fundamentally limits Large Language Models (LLMs) from dynamically adapting their weights in response to continuous streams of new information inherent in real-world tasks. Test-Time Training (TTT) offers a compelling alternative by updating a subset of model parameters (fast weights) at inference time, yet its potential in the current LLM ecosystem is hindered by critical barriers including architectural incompatibility, computational inefficiency and misaligned fast weight objectives for language modeling. In this work, we introduce In-Place Test-Time Training (In-Place TTT), a framework that seamlessly endows LLMs with Test-Time Training ability. In-Place TTT treats the final projection matrix of the ubiquitous MLP blocks as its adaptable fast weights, enabling a drop-in" enhancement for LLMs without costly retraining from scratch. Furthermore, we replace TTT's generic reconstruction objective with a tailored, theoretically-grounded objective explicitly aligned with the Next-Token-Prediction task governing autoregressive language modeling. This principled objective, combined with an efficient chunk-wise update mechanism, results in a highly scalable algorithm compatible with context parallelism. Extensive experiments validate our framework's effectiveness: as an in-place enhancement, it enables a 4B-parameter model to achieve superior performance on tasks with contexts up to 128k, and when pretrained from scratch, it consistently outperforms competitive TTT-related approaches. Ablation study results further provide deeper insights on our design choices. Collectively, our results establish In-Place TTT as a promising step towards a paradigm of continual learning in LLMs.