Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

8 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 31

Oct 6, 2026cs.CL

Language Unalignability: Why Some Concepts Resist Cross-Cultural Benchmark Evaluation

Current evaluation of multilingual Large Language Models (LLMs) rests on an implicit Translation-Isomorphism Assumption (TIA): that semantic structures across languages are congruent and mutually mappable without loss of information. We argue that this assumption is not merely violated in practice, but ill-posed in principle for a typologically identifiable class of concepts, including pragmatic markers, honorifics, and diachronically stratified terms. We formalize this failure using a usage-cloud framework, representing concepts as point sets of contextualized embeddings. We define

α

-unalignability as the impossibility of any mapping that simultaneously preserves lexical faithfulness (centroid correspondence) and structural faithfulness (local neighborhood topology). We provide three layers of evidence. Behaviorally, we show that FLORES-200 translation failures are predicted by language family and resource class but not by script, and that LOBSTER reasoning scores vary by family. Mechanistically, we report a Representation-Intervention Gap (RIG) in a nine-model case study on Yami: the models' activations encode a regularity along which Yami groups with other low-resource and Austronesian languages, yet interventions on language-specific neurons show no demonstrated advantage over random masks: the regularity is visible but not usable by this intervention. Finally, we operationalize these findings into a multidimensional diagnostic profile: Cycle-Consistency, Pragmatic-Load Disagreement, Manifold-Curvature Mismatch, and RIG. We argue that collapsing cultural competence into a single scalar incentivizes "probabilistic flattening," and that recognizing the unalignable class is a precondition for AI that respects, rather than erases, cultural divergence. This suggests that multilingual alignment is not a single well-defined objective, but a set of mutually incompatible projections.

Shu-Kai Hsieh, Da-Chen Lian

National Taiwan University

Multilingual Language Model Evaluation LLM Evaluation Cross-Cultural Language Model Evaluation Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Cultural Knowledge in Language Models

Oct 5, 2026cs.LG

A theory of platonic representations in language models

Representations of translated sentences are similar in the inner layers of multilingual language models -- an observation connected to the platonic representation hypothesis, yet unexplained theoretically. We provide an explanation based on the assumption that data have a hidden hierarchical structure whose abstract levels are shared across languages while surface levels are modality- or language-specific. Concretely, we generate synthetic languages from probabilistic context-free grammars sharing upper-level but not lower-level production rules. In this setting the Bayes-optimal next-token predictor is belief propagation (BP); encoding its messages in successive layers yields analytical predictions that agree well with transformers trained on the same data. The framework explains why cross-lingual similarity peaks in middle layers, coexists with language-specific structure, and strengthens with language proximity, model quality and data exposure. It distinguishes similarity (shared neighborhood geometry) from alignment (shared coordinates), showing that the latter occurs when code-switched data, i.e. mixed-language sentences, are abundant enough. It further predicts that subtracting from each layer the component linearly predictable from the preceding one increases cross-lingual similarity, which we confirm in pretrained LLMs.

Darshil Doshi, Wenjie Zhou, Corinna Elena Wegner +3

Johns Hopkins Univeristy · Johns Hopkins University & EPFL

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Representation Geometry in Language Models Representation Alignment Platonic Representation Hypothesis

Oct 5, 2026cs.CL

Introducing Code-Switched Contexts to Cognitively-Inspired Bilingual Model Training

During language acquisition, bilingual children are regularly exposed to code-switched input and use it as a cognitive scaffold to accelerate vocabulary growth and cross-linguistic syntactic mapping. In contrast, computational bilingual models are conventionally pretrained on interleaved monolingual corpora. While introducing synthetic code-switching during pretraining has become a promising strategy to enhance cross-lingual alignment and downstream performance, the structural and developmental parameters governing the success remain poorly understood. In this work, we investigate the efficiency of training with synthetic code-switched data across two typologically distinct language pairs by controlling two key variables: the structural location of code-switches and the dynamic switching rate across training stages. Our results show that training with code-switched data improves cross-lingual alignment for typologically close languages.

Zhuojing Huang, Luise Pohlmann, Lisa Beinborn

University of Göttingen, Germany

Language Model Pretraining Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Synthetic Data Generation for Language Models

Oct 5, 2026cs.CL

Cross-Lingual Transferability of Training Data Extraction Attacks to Recover Memorized PII

The robustness of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) protection in Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical concern, yet the risks associated with cross-lingual data extraction remain under-explored. This study evaluates the vulnerability of English-centric and multilingual models to Training Data Extraction (TDE) attacks when prompted in non-English languages. We construct a multi-domain PII dataset comprising social media handles, email addresses, and phone numbers and translate the attack contexts into Italian, Spanish, French, and German. Our results show that TDE attacks against both English-centric and multilingual models transfer to different languages: the attacks are successful on translated prompts, even though only the original English prompt might have been included in the pre-training data. A web-presence check on a sample of the translations confirms that they are not available online. The share of English leaks recovered in other languages grows with the multilingual capability of the model, and it drops sharply when the original wording is lost, even without a change of language. This suggests that native multilingual pre-training facilitates the emergence of latent cross-linguistic bridges that simplify the retrieval of personally identifiable information (PII). We analyze the activations of multilingual large language models (LLMs) and find that different translations of the same prompt are bridged in similar representations, with the strongest alignment in the middle layers. Our results highlight a fundamental security gap in modern LLMs, necessitating more robust, language-agnostic sanitization strategies for future model alignment.

Alexandru Nazare, Agnese Profico, Nicolò Vania +6

Human-Centric ART, University of Rome Tor Vergata · Department of Computer Science, University of Luxembourg · Almawave Labs, Rome

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Privacy Leakage in Language Models Cross-Lingual Transfer

Oct 1, 2026cs.CL

Cross-Lingual Alignment for Decoder-Only Models using MoE Routers

Cross-lingual contrastive learning has been a core component of multilingual encoder training, but the ability to explicitly align representations is not possible in decoder-only LLMs because of varying multilingual tokenization. However, a growing amount of research suggests that even in LLMs, higher cross-lingual representational alignment leads to improved cross-lingual transfer. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to reimagine cross-lingual contrastive learning given the architectural constraints of modern LLMs. Rather than applying an auxiliary alignment loss on hidden states, we propose using the outputs of the mixture-of-experts (MoE) routers as the target for alignment. Router outputs lend themselves better to pooling over many tokens, enabling more reliable cross-lingual comparisons at the sequence-level. Controlled continual pre-training experiments on four open-source MoEs show that incorporating this routing loss also aligns the underlying hidden representations across languages. Most importantly, this loss improves multilingual performance on our diverse evaluation suite, demonstrating the potential of cross-lingual MoE router alignment.

Lucas Bandarkar, Clark Peng, Ahmed Haj Ahmed +2

University of California, Los Angeles∗ · Haverford College · MILA - Quebec AI Institute & McGill University

Mixture-of-Experts Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Cross-Lingual Transfer

Oct 1, 2026cs.LG

Beyond Linear Concepts: Discovering and Aligning Non-Linear Concept Manifolds in Large Language Models

Understanding information processing in large language models (LLMs) requires dissecting the geometric organization of their internal token representations. While existing mechanistic interpretability (MI) methods seek to extract concepts, they are constrained by a strong linearity assumption challenged by evidence of non-linear feature manifolds. We move beyond linear concepts by adapting Non-Linear Multi-Dimensional Concept Discovery (NLMCD) from computer vision to token-level LLM activations, modeling concepts as low-dimensional manifolds. To compare concept manifolds across layers and models, we introduce a concept-based alignment (CBA) score, a generalized Rand index that measures geometric proximity without explicit feature matching. Our analysis yields six key findings: (i) a neighboring-layer sanity check shows CBA is more sensitive than PCA- or CKA-based linear baselines; (ii) layer-by-layer alignment matrices reveal two block structures in intermediate and late layers, consistent across models and obscured by linear metrics; (iii) concept composition remains syntax-dominated through most of the network before giving way to increasingly mixed syntactic-semantic concepts in later layers, with increasing output-orientation toward the final layers; (iv) multilingual concept sharing between English and Mandarin is training-dependent rather than universal, strongest in Qwen, weaker in Llama, and absent in GPT-2; (v) inter-model alignment mirrors this structure, with strong correspondence between same-family Qwen models of different scale but weak alignment across model families; and (vi) across Tulu-3 training stages, alignment is highest between adjacent stages, with the largest shift between the base model and SFT, while subsequent preference-alignment stages (DPO, RLVR) leave early layers largely unchanged and RLVR mostly preserves DPO's concepts in late layers.

Tido Specht, Elias Benedict Krey, Nils Neukirch +1

University of Groningen · Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

LLM Alignment LLM Interpretability Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Representation Geometry in Language Models

Oct 1, 2026cs.IR

Do Multilingual Encoders Produce Language-Consistent Semantic IDs?

Semantic IDs (SIDs) compress item embeddings into discrete code sequences used in generative retrieval. We ask whether a multilingual encoder is sufficient for different-language renderings of the same product to receive language-consistent SIDs. Using Amazon ESCI listings rendered in English, Spanish, and Japanese, we test whether translations remain close to their English source, whether residual quantization is unusually sensitive to translation-induced movement, and whether multilingual or language-balanced quantizer fitting improves SID agreement. Multilingual E5 places translations measurably apart: under an English-heavy fit, a Japanese translation preserves the first SID code of its English counterpart in only 7.7% of cases, compared with 89.0% for an English rewording. Distance-matched product-directed controls produce nearly the same full-SID mismatch as translation, providing no evidence that the quantizer selectively amplifies language directions. Balancing the fitting mixture makes codebook use more uniform but further reduces cross-lingual prefix agreement: Spanish first-code consistency falls from 28.3% to 6.6%, while an English-only fit preserves it for 67.6% of Spanish translations. These results show that multilingual exposure and balanced codebook use alone do not guarantee language-consistent SIDs.

Abhinav Bohra, Anuj Bohra

Rutgers University

Multilingual Language Model Evaluation Semantic ID Recommendation Residual VQ Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Cross-Lingual Consistency in Language Models

Sep 28, 2026cs.CL

Multilinguality in Hybrid Attention LLMs

In response to the growing demand for long sequences in agentic and reasoning use cases, many state-of-the-art LLMs combine multiple variants of attention to mitigate the quadratic complexity of traditional softmax attention. These hybrid attention LLMs aim to balance the strengths and limitations of full attention and alternatives based on recurrence. This work presents a first study of how hybrid attention impacts the multilinguality of LLMs. Beyond the impact on long sequences in poorly tokenized languages, our study is motivated by the possibility that the inductive biases of the recurrent state alter linguistic processing. Our interpretability analysis confirms this, showing that cross-lingual representations in hybrid models develop in patterns tied to the ordering of recurrent and full-attention layers. Across diverse models, we notably observe a pronounced spike in cross-lingual alignment around the first full-attention layer. These findings lead us to question the conventional ordering of attention layers. In distillation experiments on multilingual data, all alternative layer orderings outperform the standard throughout training, learning up to 2.5X faster. These stark, replicable results prompt our theory that multilingual models would benefit from starting with a full-attention layer rather than recurrent layers.

Lucas Bandarkar, Junlin Hu, Chenyuan Yang +2

University of California, Los Angeles · Fudan University

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Hybrid Attention

Sep 16, 2026cs.SD

A Cross-Lingual Acoustic Disease-Alignment Framework for Respiratory Health Assessment from Spontaneous Speech

Spontaneous speech offers a scalable, noninvasive signal for respiratory health assessment, yet interpretable models that generalize across languages remain challenging because disease-related acoustic changes are confounded by language-specific phonetic variation. We present CL-DAF, a Cross-Lingual Disease-Alignment Framework that identifies acoustic dimensions whose disease effects remain consistent across languages. Using 201 English and 75 newly collected Bangla speakers, we construct a common 272-dimensional acoustic representation and quantify disease alignment using signed rank-biserial effects and the Language Invariance Score. We first show that spontaneous Bangla speech separates COPD from controls (AUC 0.85); however, 133 features reverse their disease direction across languages and the full representation transfers poorly (AUC 0.49 from Bangla to English). CL-DAF isolates 26 disease-aligned features that raise AUCs to 0.825 and 0.722 from English to Bangla and Bangla to English, respectively. These findings provide a foundation for multilingual clinical speech models emphasizing pathology over language-dependent variation.

Roksana Khanom, Raghib Asfak Tasnim, Bodrun Nahar Bithi +4

University of Maryland, College Park, USA · Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh · Dr. M R Khan Shishu Hospital & Institute of Child Health, Bangladesh +1

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Speech Processing Feature Selection Cross-Lingual Transfer

Sep 15, 2026cs.CL

Right Tool, Right Job: Native-Language Evaluation, Tokenizer Sensitivity, and Methodological Findings from a French-Only BabyLM

We submit MéTRON-FR, a 125M GPT-2 pretrained on 92.47M words of French, to the BabyLM 2026 Strict track. It scores 85.97 +/- 0.17% on QFrBLiMP (a native Quebec-French benchmark of grammatical minimal pairs) and 62.80% on the BabyLM-weighted leaderboard. A cross-lingual GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation) protocol that combines French task-data translation with rank-16 LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation) produces a sharp task-type gradient: relational tasks gain measurably, while world-knowledge tasks regress. Bilingual Lexicon Induction aligns the French embeddings to GPT-2 at p@1 = 68.84 +/- 8.61%, 18X above chance, suggesting cross-lingual alignment tracks acquired grammatical competence rather than training duration. An ablation study shows that single-token zero-shot scoring is dominated by tokenizer and template artifacts at the child scale, motivating tokenizer-swap sensitivity, placebo-controlled prompting, and native-language minimal-pair benchmarks as standard diagnostics.

Adam Zachary Wasserman, David Beauchemin

1Open Honest Foundation · 2Group for Research in Artificial Intelligence of Laval University (GRAIL), Université Laval, Québec, Canada

LLM Evaluation Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Subword Tokenization Cross-Lingual Transfer

Sep 14, 2026cs.CL

Online Language Adaptive Sampling for Better Distributed Cross-lingual Gains

Realignment is a promising approach for improving the cross-lingual transfer ability of multilingual language models, particularly for extremely low-resource languages (LRLs). However, existing realignment methods rely on uniform and random sampling of parallel sentences across languages, which may be suboptimal under limited batch sizes. In practice, models may benefit from seeing certain languages more frequently, especially those that are poorly aligned, and the optimal distribution can evolve throughout training. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective adaptive sampling strategy that assigns trainable sampling probabilities to each language. Languages that contribute more to the realignment loss are sampled more frequently in subsequent batches, and the optimal distribution can evolve throughout training. Our method employs an inner-outer optimization loop with a small overhead, leading to consistent performance improvements and, more importantly, distributing the gains across languages. We observed a

+0.67

average performance increase on all tasks with XLM-R, and

+0.60

with Gemma 2 9B compared with uniform realignment. Furthermore, our method is robust across different models. Code available at https://github.com/felixgaschi/multilingual-alignment-and-transfer.

Quang Phuoc Nguyen, Félix Gaschi, David Anugraha +2

1Ontario Tech University · 2Doctrine · 3Stanford University +2

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Adaptive Sampling Low-Resource Language Processing Cross-Lingual Transfer

Sep 9, 2026cs.CL

Improving Cross-Lingual Token Representations by Adding a Pinch of SALT

Cross-lingual sentence encoders enable scalable transfer across hundreds of languages, powering applications such as translation mining and zero-shot learning in low-resource settings. Although trained for sentence-level alignment, they are increasingly also applied to token-level tasks such as hallucination detection and sequence tagging, exposing a mismatch between training and usage. We propose SALT, a lightweight post-training method that improves token representations by injecting span-level supervision into existing sentence encoders. Across five multilingual token-level benchmarks, SALT achieves the best overall results on four of them, outperforming alternative fine-tuning strategies and competitive encoders. It also improves sentence-level performance on cross-lingual retrieval and classification tasks. These results demonstrate that span-level supervision is an effective signal for improving both token and sentence representations.

Guillem Ramírez

ILCC, University of Edinburgh

Sentence Embeddings Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment

Aug 31, 2026cs.CL

Where Do Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders Fail on Low-Resource Languages?

Recent multilingual vision--language encoders cover hundreds of languages in a single model, yet on two state-of-the-art instances retrieval on low-resource languages (LRL; e.g. Swahili) trails high-resource ones (HRL; e.g. English) by

30^+

,pp. We ask where in the trained encoder this gap is located. Prior modality-gap and cross-lingual subspace work suggests a linear language direction at the output crowds out alignment-relevant geometry. We falsify this: LEACE drives the linear language classifier from

>99\%

to near chance and iterated INLP to

37

--

50\%

while LRL retrieval moves within

\pm 1.5

,pp and all tier means within

2.2

,pp, tracking random controls. The linear bias is a \emph{symptom}, not the cause. Instead, the alignment-causal factor lies along the encoder's forward path: the EOS (end-of-sequence) hidden state's per-language trajectory diverges with depth. Substituting the EOS with its parallel English value three blocks before the projector lifts Swahili from

22.1\%

to

69.1\%

on one encoder (and reproduces on the other); three controls rule out pooled-position tautology and English specificity. A front-layer trunk that pulls each language's projection toward the parallel-content centroid corroborates the diagnosis at training time, recovering

+9.6

/

+17.1

,pp on LRL XM3600 retrieval (1{,}000-image subset), with consistent gains across three further benchmarks while preserving HRL performance.

Donghoon Han, SungHyun Moon, Aidyn Zhakatayev +2

Dnotitia Inc.

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Multilingual VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Alignment Low-Resource Language Processing

Aug 17, 2026cs.CL

There is No Theoretical Curse of Multilinguality For Embedding Space Structure

A central goal of multilingual NLP is to achieve high monolingual performance per language and cross-lingual alignment for large-scale language coverage with a multilingual model. The curse of multilinguality describes the phenomenon of degradation in multilingual model performance as we increase language coverage, posing a threat to the above goal. This paper asks whether multilingual embedding spaces are inherently incapable of achieving perfect multilinguality without a prohibitive increase in required capacity. We first formalize the goal of "perfect multilinguality", embodied in two multilinguality conditions. We then prove that the minimum dimensionality required for perfect multilinguality grows only logarithmically in the number of languages. That is, we show that there is no theoretical curse of multilinguality for embedding space structure. This suggests that the empirical curse of multilinguality is a result of real world data and training conditions. We back this understanding with a small-scale empirical study. Our paper provides the first theoretical and intrinsic perspective on the curse of multilinguality.

Niyati Bafna, Neha Verma, Vilém Zouhar +2

Johns Hopkins University, Center for Language and Speech Processing · ETH Zurich

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Text Embedding Models

Aug 9, 2026cs.CL

Multilingual Emotion Neurons in Large Audio-Language Models

Emotion is central to human communication, and its expression varies across languages. Large audio-language models (LALMs) achieve strong performance on multilingual speech tasks, yet it remains unclear whether they encode emotion through language-specific correlations or language-agnostic representations. We present the first neuron-level interpretability study of this question. We define Multilingual Emotion Neurons (MLENs) as functional units exhibiting stable emotional selectivity and aligned causal effects across languages, and introduce Consistency-Regularized Fusion (CR-Fusion) to identify them. Across four modern LALMs and 12 typologically diverse languages, emotion-sensitive neurons identified independently per language show minimal overlap, and additional monolingual identification data saturates quickly without isolating more transferable units, motivating identification from pooled cross-lingual evidence. Causal interventions demonstrate that MLENs identified by CR-Fusion provide more precise and transferable affective control than monolingual neuron sets in both zero-shot and low-resource settings. Leave-one-out ablations further reveal asymmetric transfer: individual identification languages, including low-resource ones, contribute non-redundant evidence, while several low-resource languages benefit most from the resulting cross-lingual transfer. Together, our findings provide the first causal, neuron-level account of how LALMs encode emotion across languages, and establish multilingual neuron identification as an effective mechanism for understanding cross-lingual affective behavior.

Xiutian Zhao, Philipp Koehn, Björn Schuller +1

Center for Language and Speech Processing (CLSP), Johns Hopkins University, USA · Group on Language, Audio & Music (GLAM), Imperial College London, UK

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Audio-Language Models Mechanistic Interpretability Emotion Representation in Language Models

Aug 4, 2026cs.CL

ChronoLens: Measuring Language Change Across Time, Languages, and Linguistic Levels

Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder (

ρ=0.72

versus

0.29

and

0.28

), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.

Gagan Bhatia, Julian Schlenker, Simone Paolo Ponzetto +1

University of Technology Nuremberg · University of Mannheim

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Semantic Change Detection

Aug 4, 2026cs.CL

Predicting Multilingual Classification and Translation Performance of LLMs with Cross-Lingual Alignment $\unicode{x2013}$ Is English Enough?

Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have been shown to perform better on non-English classification tasks when the representations of the given language are more aligned to English within the model. Several cross-lingual alignment (CLA) scores have been proposed for use with LLMs, along with multiple approaches for extracting embeddings from the models. We provide a comparative analysis of 27 CLA score variants, examining how they differ and how well each predicts downstream performance across three tasks. Crucially, while LLMs are widely used for generative tasks such as machine translation, prior work has focused almost exclusively on classification. We therefore investigate whether CLA scores are similarly predictive of translation performance. To enable computing correlations across target languages, we propose a PMI-based translation metric, which is less dependent on the target language and correlates strongly with chrF. We find that CLA with English predicts translation quality comparably to or better than source-target CLA, providing new evidence that LLMs use English as an internal pivot language.

Adnan Al Ali, Kathy Hämmerl, Jindřich Libovický +1

Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Czech Republic · Technical University of Munich, Germany · Munich Center for Machine Learning

Multilingual Language Model Evaluation Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Cross-Lingual Transfer MT Evaluation

Aug 1, 2026cs.CL

Native Multilingual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Low-Resource Southeast Asian Languages

Large Language Models have achieved substantial progress in reasoning capabilities. Yet in low-resource native settings, many suffer from cross-lingual collapse, reverting to English during intermediate steps that require complex logical reasoning. This presents a cold-start bottleneck for policy optimization, whereas standard fine-tuning risks catastrophic forgetting due to cross-lingual representation drift. To address these challenges, we introduce the Onramp-Sequence Cross-Distillation (OSCD), a post-training algorithm that projects high-resource reasoning trajectories into low-resource vocabulary subspaces during generative training rollouts via an integrated translator agentic loop, ensuring the stable and efficient translation of dynamically generated reference samples for fine-tuning. This is coupled with joint-embedding semantic alignment of both reference and target-language reasoning traces, thereby bridging the pairwise cross-lingual representational gaps. Comprehensive evaluations using the AIME25 and HMMT25 benchmarks demonstrate that OSCD yields up to 3.2 times overall improvements in native Southeast Asian languages for mathematical reasoning, of which the joint-embedding semantic alignment component contributes up to 6.4% improvements in linguistic debiasing over translation-only baselines.

Sean Gip Lim, William Chandra Tjhi, Hai Leong Chieu

1Nanyang Technological University · 2AI Singapore · 3DSO National Laboratories

Numerical Reasoning in Language Models Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Reasoning in Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Language Model Distillation Low-Resource Language Processing+1

Jun 25, 2026cs.CL

Soft Token Alignment for Cross-Lingual Reasoning

Multilingual large language models often produce inconsistent reasoning and answers for semantically equivalent prompts in different languages. Prior work suggests that intermediate representations can be relatively language-agnostic, but generation becomes increasingly language-specific as models commit to discrete output tokens. This is problematic because language-specific lexical choices can cause semantically equivalent reasoning paths to diverge across languages. These divergences motivate searching for a cross-lingual alignment signal that is less tied to any single vocabulary item or script. We propose SOLAR, an auxiliary objective for supervised fine-tuning that aligns soft-token representations across languages, using English as a pivot. Soft tokens are probability-weighted mixtures over the vocabulary embeddings, yielding continuous representations that can aggregate information from semantically related tokens across languages. We then align each non-English soft-token summary to its English counterpart in the shared embedding space. Across four multilingual reasoning benchmarks, SOLAR improves accuracy by up to +17.7 points over the base model and +3.8 over standard supervised fine-tuning, with the largest gains on low-resource languages. SOLAR also strengthens final-layer cross-lingual similarity and substantially reduces language-cluster separability, suggesting that aligning soft-token representations helps preserve shared semantic structure during multilingual reasoning.

Jiayi He, Jungsoo Park, Wei Xu +1

Georgia Institute of Technology

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Reasoning in Language Models LLM Fine-Tuning Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Cross-Lingual Consistency in Language Models Representation Alignment+1

Jun 17, 2026cs.IR

SHIFT: Semantic Harmonization via Index-side Feature Transformation for Multilingual Information Retrieval

With the rapid expansion of massive multilingual corpora, Multilingual Information Retrieval (MLIR) has emerged as a critical technology for global information access. MLIR enables users to retrieve semantically relevant documents from multilingual text collections using a single-language query. However, recent multilingual dense retrieval models often exhibit a strong preference for documents in the same language as the query. This leads to severe language bias, where top-ranked results are dominated by documents of specific languages, even when documents in other languages contain more semantically relevant information. To address this issue, we propose SHIFT, a training-free method applicable in the indexing stage. Specifically, SHIFT utilizes parallel translation pairs to estimate a relative language vector for each target language with respect to a source language. Subsequently, SHIFT corrects the language-specific offset by subtracting this relative language vector from document embeddings during indexing. Our comprehensive evaluation across four MLIR benchmarks and diverse dense retrieval models confirms that SHIFT can effectively mitigate language bias and enhance MLIR performance.

Youngjoon Jang, Seongtae Hong, Hyeonseok Moon +1

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Multilingual IR Dense Retrieval Cross-Lingual Transfer

Jun 14, 2026cs.CL

Beyond English: Uncovering the Multilingual Gap in Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-Language-Action models have recently demonstrated promising capabilities in learning generalist robot policies from large-scale multimodal data. However, most existing VLA systems are trained and evaluated primarily with English instructions, leaving their ability to understand and execute instructions in other languages largely unexplored. While the underlying large language models often possess multilingual capabilities, it remains unclear whether these multilingual capabilities transfer to VLAs during training. In this work, we present the first systematic study of multilingual instruction following in VLA models. We first construct multilingual instructions by extending existing benchmarks with translations of their instructions. Using these instructions, we evaluate several representative VLA models across a range of tasks in simulation settings. Our experiments reveal a significant multilingual gap: models trained primarily on English instructions exhibit substantial performance degradation when evaluated on other languages, even when the underlying language backbone is multilingual. We provide several findings and analyses to understand the multilingual gap. Cross-lingual transfer behavior analysis shows that performance drops correlate with both instruction understanding and action execution. Representation analyses suggest that multilingual instruction-caused representation shifts may contribute to the multilingual gap. Motivated by these findings, we further explore strategies to improve multilingual performance in VLAs. We propose a simple yet effective multilingual fine-tuning approach, Multilingual Principal Component Alignment, which leverages Principal Component Analysis to get the principal component subspace and align projected multilingual representations, effectively reducing the multilingual performance gap.

Hanyang Chen, Hongliang Li, Jiarui Cao +6

Beijing Jiaotong University

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Instruction Following Vision-Language-Action Models Cross-Lingual Transfer

Jun 4, 2026cs.SD

Learning Emotion-discriminative Representations for Zero-Shot Cross-lingual Speech Emotion Recognition

Zero-shot cross-lingual speech emotion recognition (SER) remains challenging due to distribution mismatches across languages and the lack of emotion annotations in target language. Under such conditions, models trained solely on source-language data frequently suffer from degraded generalization when evaluated on unseen target languages. To address this limitation, we propose an emotion-discriminative representation learning method that integrates supervised contrastive learning and speaker adversarial learning. The contrastive learning promotes cross-lingual emotion alignment, while speaker adversarial learning suppresses speaker-related cues to encourage speaker-invariant representations. Experimental results under a zero-shot cross-lingual SER setting demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves SER performance over conventional training strategies.

Jinyi Mi, Ding Ma, Tomoki Toda

Graduate School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Japan · Information Technology Center, Nagoya University, Japan

Zero-Shot Learning Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Speech Emotion Recognition Invariant Representation Learning

May 29, 2026cs.IR

MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives

Multilingual Information Retrieval (MLIR) reflects real-world search environments in which queries and relevant documents may appear in different languages within a mixed-language corpus. However, existing embedding models are primarily optimized for Multi-Monolingual retrieval and their performance often degrades in MLIR settings. Moreover, directly applying conventional contrastive learning to MLIR can exacerbate language clustering and expose a trade-off between cross-lingual alignment and embedding uniformity. To address these limitations, we propose MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives, a two-stage framework that uses a stable English semantic space from a high-performing teacher model as an anchor. MIMO first initializes the student model's cross-lingual alignment through knowledge distillation, and then jointly optimizes distillation and cross-lingual contrastive learning to improve retrieval discrimination while preserving alignment. Extensive experiments show that MIMO consistently outperforms existing cross-lingual training baselines across various MLIR and Multi-Monolingual benchmarks. MIMO also remains competitive with off-the-shelf models of similar or larger parameter scales. Furthermore, our cross-lingual Alignment-Uniformity analysis clarifies the distinct roles of the two loss components and shows that their combination yields a favorable trade-off between alignment and uniformity.

Youngjoon Jang, Seongtae Hong, Heuiseok Lim

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University

Contrastive Learning Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Multilingual IR Representation Alignment

May 27, 2026cs.CL

Supervised Semantic Differential for Cross-Cultural Concept Analysis: A Case Study of Human Affect

Cross-cultural comparison of psychological meaning requires methods that go beyond word-level translation and examine how semantic dimensions are organized across languages. We introduce a cross-lingual extension of the Supervised Semantic Differential (SSD), which estimates supervised semantic gradients in embedding space and compares them across aligned multilingual word embeddings. The method tests gradient alignment and difference using permutation procedures and bootstrap intervals, and interprets residual differences through clustering around the difference gradient. We demonstrate the approach on Polish, English, and French affective norm lexicons, modeling Valence, Arousal, and Dominance where available. Affective dimensions were significantly recoverable across languages and model settings. Cross-lingual comparisons showed broad alignment together with structured residual differences: Valence appeared mostly shared, whereas Arousal and Dominance produced more interpretable contrasts involving bodily threat, aesthetic stimulation, internal emotionality, macro-level authority, and everyday control. Several clusters also reflected corpus-specific artifacts, underscoring the need for cautious interpretation. Cross-lingual SSD offers an explainable framework for testing semantic alignment, identifying divergence, and generating hypotheses about cross-cultural differences in psychological meaning.

Jan Sikora, Paweł Lenartowicz, Hubert Plisiecki

University of Warsaw · Society for Open Science Centre for Brain Research, Jagiellonian University · IDEAS Research Institute

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Computational Psycholinguistics

May 23, 2026cs.CL

Discovering Lexical Gaps Using Embeddings from Multilingual LLMs

Lexical gaps are words that do not exist in certain languages. They pose challenges for building multilingual lexical resources, for machine translation, and for cross-lingual transfer. Existing lexical gap detection relies on human judgments or fixed conceptual taxonomies. We propose a data-driven framework for identifying cross-lingual lexical gaps. We extracted contextualized embeddings from Korean-English bilingual LLMs for Korean-to-English and English-to-Korean translation pairs. Combinations of LLMs, embedding types, dimensionality, and orthogonal transformations across 100 train-test splits yielded 4000 distinct embedding spaces in each source language. In each space, we computed the semantic similarity between each source word and its nearest neighbor in the target language, and compared their distribution for gap words versus non-gap words. In 94% (Korean-to-English) and 97% (English-to-Korean) of embedding spaces, gap words showed weaker cross-lingual semantic alignment than non-gap words. Logistic classifiers trained on unaligned embedding spaces can reliably separate gap words from non-gap words, achieving AUCs of 0.81 (Korean-to-English) and 0.76 (English-to-Korean) and retrieving 18/19 Korean and 26/27 English gap words. This approach provides a language-agnostic and taxonomy-free method for scalable lexical gap identification.

Yoonwon Jung, Aaron S. Cohen, Benjamin K. Bergen

Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego

Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment

May 21, 2026cs.CL

Brain-LLM Alignment Tracks Training Data, Not Typology

Brain-LLM alignment is well established in English, yet the brain's language network is neuroanatomically universal across languages. Does alignment also generalize cross-linguistically, and what governs the variation? We test this using fMRI data from 112 participants across English, Chinese, and French (the Le Petit Prince corpus) and seven LLMs spanning English-dominant, Chinese-dominant, and multilingual architectures. Our central finding is that training-language dominance, not an inherent property of English, drives the alignment pattern: a Chinese-dominant model (Baichuan2-7B), architecture-matched to LLaMA-2-7B, reverses the gradient entirely, aligning best with Chinese brains and worst with English. Beyond training dominance, formal typological distance independently covaries with alignment degradation, syntax-associated brain regions (IFG) show

2.3\times

steeper typological gradients than lexico-semantic regions (PTL), and tokenization fertility accounts for

\sim

60% of a cross-linguistic shift in optimal encoding layer. These results reveal that the apparent "English advantage" in brain-LLM alignment is an artifact of training data composition, while the remaining variation reflects genuine typological structure concentrated in syntactic processing.

Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu

The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China · Stellaris AI Limited Hong Kong, China

Multilingual Language Models Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Linguistic Typology Cross-Lingual Consistency in Language Models Cross-Lingual Transfer

May 2, 2026cs.LG

Concepts Whisper While Syntax Shouts: Spectral Anti-Concentration and the Dual Geometry of Transformer Representations

We test whether the causal inner product of \citet{park2024linear} -- defined by the unembedding covariance

Σ

-- enables cross-lingual concept transport. Across 17 models and 4 language pairs, a matched-spectrum randomization test finds that Whitened Causal Alignment is indistinguishable from spectral regularization alone (

p = 0.95

). However, this failure reveals a broader phenomenon: anti-concentration is observed in residual-stream difference-of-means vectors across five architecture families (

p < 10^{-33}

) and supported by SAE features (e.g.,

p = 4.5 \times 10^{-19}

) and linear probes on Gemma and Llama. We discover a \emph{dual geometry}: activation-space concept directions anti-concentrate in the spectral tail, while static unembedding-row contrasts \emph{concentrate} in high-variance directions (

p < 10^{-4}

). Split-injection causal interventions support the functional basis on Gemma and Llama (Cohen's

d

up to

1.80

), and POS-tag probing across 8 models shows syntax preferentially encodes in the high-variance subspace in 6 of 8 architectures (

p < 0.013

), with the Qwen~2.5 family showing a significant reversal consistent with architecture-specific spectral structure. These results suggest transformers may rotate semantic content into spectrally quiet regions during contextualized processing, encoding concepts where they can be manipulated with reduced grammatical disruption.

Pratyush Acharya, Nuraj Rimal, Habish Dhakal

Transformer Interpretability Representation Learning Neural Representation Geometry Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Neural Encoding Cross-Lingual Transfer

Apr 22, 2026cs.CL

ORPHEAS: A Cross-Lingual Greek-English Embedding Model for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Effective retrieval-augmented generation across bilingual Greek--English applications requires embedding models capable of capturing both domain-specific semantic relationships and cross-lingual semantic alignment. Existing multilingual embedding models distribute their representational capacity across numerous languages, limiting their optimization for Greek and failing to encode the morphological complexity and domain-specific terminological structures inherent in Greek text. In this work, we propose ORPHEAS, a specialized Greek--English embedding model for bilingual retrieval-augmented generation. ORPHEAS is trained with a high quality dataset generated by a knowledge graph-based fine-tuning methodology which is applied to a diverse multi-domain corpus, which enables language-agnostic semantic representations. The numerical experiments across monolingual and cross-lingual retrieval benchmarks reveal that ORPHEAS outperforms state-of-the-art multilingual embedding models, demonstrating that domain-specialized fine-tuning on morphologically complex languages does not compromise cross-lingual retrieval capability.

Ioannis E. Livieris, Athanasios Koursaris, Alexandra Apostolopoulou +2

Novelcore, Athens, GR 10436 · Department of Business Administration & Organization Administration, University of Peloponnese, Kalamata„ GR 24100

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Word Embeddings Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Multilingual IR Text Embedding Models

Mar 23, 2026cs.CL

Adapting Self-Supervised Speech Representations for Cross-lingual Dysarthria Detection in Parkinson's Disease

The limited availability of dysarthric speech data makes cross-lingual detection an important but challenging problem. A key difficulty is that speech representations often encode language-dependent structure that can confound dysarthria detection. We propose a representation-level language shift (LS) that aligns source-language self-supervised speech representations with the target-language distribution using centroid-based vector adaptation estimated from healthy-control speech. We evaluate the approach on oral DDK recordings from Parkinson's disease speech datasets in Czech, German, and Spanish under both cross-lingual and multilingual settings. LS substantially improves sensitivity and F1 in cross-lingual settings, while yielding smaller but consistent gains in multilingual settings. Representation analysis further shows that LS reduces language identity in the embedding space, supporting the interpretation that LS removes language-dependent structure.

Abner Hernandez, Eunjung Yeo, Kwanghee Choi +12

1FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany · 2UT Austin, USA · 3CMU, USA +5

Domain Adaptation Medical Diagnosis Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Parkinson's Disease Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning Cross-Lingual Transfer

Mar 20, 2026cs.CL

Neither Here Nor There: Cross-Lingual Representation Dynamics of Code-Mixed Text in Multilingual Encoders

Multilingual encoder-based language models are widely used for code-mixed analysis, yet their internal representations of code-mixed inputs -- and their relationship to the constituent languages -- remain poorly understood. Using Hindi-English as a case study, we construct a unified trilingual corpus of parallel English, Hindi (Devanagari), and Romanized code-mixed sentences. We then probe cross-lingual representation alignment in standard multilingual encoders and their code-mix-adapted variants using CKA, token-level saliency, and entropy-based uncertainty analysis. We find that while standard models align English and Hindi well, code-mixed inputs remain loosely connected to either language -- and that continued pre-training on code-mixed data improves English-code-mixed alignment at the cost of English-Hindi alignment. Interpretability analyses further reveal a clear asymmetry: models process code-mixed text through an English-dominant semantic subspace, while native-script Hindi provides complementary signals that reduce representational uncertainty. Motivated by these findings, we introduce a trilingual post-training alignment objective that brings code-mixed representations closer to both constituent languages simultaneously, yielding more balanced cross-lingual alignment and downstream gains on sentiment analysis and hate speech detection -- showing that grounding code-mixed representations in their constituent languages meaningfully helps cross-lingual understanding. Code is available at: https://github.com/debajyotimaz/tri_align_EMNLP_2026.

Debajyoti Mazumder, Divyansh Pathak, Prashant Kodali +1

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal, India · Microsoft Corporation

Multilingual Language Models Code-Switching Cross-Lingual Representation Alignment Cross-Lingual Transfer