Cross-Modal Conflicts

Conflicting emotional cues can be individually valid: a subdued voice may reflect a blocked goal while a smile satisfies a social obligation. Their interpretation depends on what the event means to the person. We introduce VISTA (Value-Informed Semantic Trust Arbitration), a learned seven-field appraisal interface that conditions modality arbitration on concerns, event relations, and expression conditions while retaining a joint-evidence residual. A log-odds decomposition separates emotion expectation from cue diagnosticity, motivating an interface that lets appraisal change how evidence is interpreted. With a shared Qwen2.5-Omni-7B backbone and matched training examples and steps, VISTA reaches 64.5% conflict accuracy on CA-MER, improving on modality gating by 2.5 percentage points on conflict and 0.2 on consistency. Shuffling appraisal across scenes or removing its decision connection reduces this benefit. A common frozen-backbone probe reaches 0.600 macro CCC for appraisal readout, compared with 0.505 for emotion-only fine-tuning. Evaluations across five benchmarks connect recognition under increasing conflict with appraisal readout and downstream decision use. Together, the analyses and experiments support scene-specific appraisal as an intermediate representation that helps interpret conflicting emotional evidence.

In multimodal emotion recognition (MER), human affective states are inferred by integrating complementary cues from multiple modalities. In audio-text MER, affective cues are often entangled with speaker style and lexical content, while cross-modal disagreement further complicates how the evidence should be integrated. Under conventional discriminative fusion, multimodal evidence is compressed into a terminal prediction, with modality-specific cues and conflict information insufficiently preserved. In large generative affective models, by contrast, affective reasoning is typically embedded in language decoding, leaving emotion evidence implicit and difficult to verify in a structured space. To address these limitations, BiCFlow-MER (Bidirectional Conditional Flow for Multimodal Emotion Recognition) is proposed as a conditional-flow framework in which audio-text MER is formulated as generative evidence transport within a structured emotion space. Within BiCFlow-MER, emotion-oriented evidence is disentangled from speaker-style and lexical-content factors to construct a conflict-aware affective condition. Guided by this condition, each utterance is transported to an explicit emotion-space endpoint through a bidirectional rectified flow. Candidate emotions are jointly verified through adaptive prototype-cloud scoring of the transported endpoint and backward class-to-condition consistency with the original multimodal condition, enabling conflict-aware recognition. BiCFlow-MER is shown to outperform all compared methods across IEMOCAP, MELD, and the zero-shot CASE benchmark. By orchestrating discriminative recognition and generative evidence modeling through conditional transport, BiCFlow-MER defines a new MER paradigm.

Autonomous agents operating on multisensory data cannot assume that all sensory modalities remain consistently informative. In real environments, sensory streams are frequently corrupted by noise, missing data, or inter-modal incongruence, requiring adaptive arbitration between competing sensory hypotheses. While active inference provides a principled framework for uncertainty-guided inference, the role of dynamically inferred sensory precision in generative multimodal arbitration under sensory conflict remains comparatively underexplored. We propose a multimodal perceptual inference model in which latent beliefs and modality-specific sensory precisions are jointly updated through iterative free-energy minimization. In our proposed model, sensory precision dynamics not only reflect sensory uncertainty but actively shape the evolution of latent beliefs during multimodal conflict. In addition, we introduce a learned prior over sensory precisions that induces structured, class-dependent precision patterns and influences cross-modal inference dynamics. We evaluate the model using a synthetic multimodal MNIST dataset combining visual, auditory, and tactile representations of digit classes under controlled sensory noise and inter-modal incongruence. Results show that dynamic precision inference improves reconstruction robustness under corrupted sensory evidence, supports coherent latent inference from reduced sensory evidence, and enables stable arbitration between conflicting modalities. Furthermore, learned precision priors generate interpretable precision structures that shape inference dynamics and cross-modal latent structure. These findings support sensory precision inference as a mechanistic control process for adaptive multimodal belief formation under uncertainty, highlighting precision dynamics as a computational mechanism for robust and interpretable multisensory integration.

Recent deepfake detection studies increasingly suggest remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) signals as an authenticity cue. However, existing benchmarks lack physiological ground truth, and current detectors underexplore the cross-level relationship between facial features and physiological dynamics, often relying on late fusion or rPPG features alone. In this paper, we construct high-fidelity deepfake manipulations on established real rPPG datasets (COHFACE and UBFC-rPPG) to investigate how forgeries disrupt natural physiological signals and facial behavior at the same time. Building on this analysis, we propose a bidirectional co-attention fusion detector that jointly models rPPG and facial behavior tokens. This mechanism explicitly captures the cross-level dependencies between pulse dynamics and facial motion to learn a robust, joint authenticity representation. Extensive experiments using a subject-disjoint 5-fold evaluation demonstrate the superiority of our approach. Achieving a 92.80% AUC on constructed datasets using face swapping and 96.78% AUC on motion transfer, our model outperforms both the rPPG-only single modality baseline and the best feature-level fusion methods. Furthermore, transfer-learning result of the fusion detector on Celeb-DF-v2 while keeping both feature extractors fixed achieves 91.20% accuracy and 86.08% AUC, which suggests applicability under target-domain adaptation.

World models, systems that generate what happens next given current environmental conditions, are increasingly being implemented with multi-modal generation in mind. However, generating multiple modalities simultaneously, such as visual simulations alongside physical state predictions in the form of text, introduces the risk of cross-modal inconsistency. Tested separately, both outputs may look convincing while still disagreeing: a model can calculate that a ball should rebound in one modality, then generate no rebound in another modality, to say nothing of diverging from real-world dynamics entirely. In this work we focus on two failures explicitly: \emph{Internal misalignment}, the disagreement between the world model's generated video and the same world model's prediction in a different modalities, and \emph{external misalignment} the disagreement between the world model's generation and an analytic physical environment. We derive common contracts of event, magnitude, timing, and construct a physics grounded pipeline to make comparisons measurable in both external and internal settings. We then ask whether progressively supplying the model's own contract (the A ladder for the internal setting) or a corrected physical contract (the B ladder for the external setting) closes the respective gaps. Across four mechanisms and 20 settings, we find that while language answers all 22 text probes correctly with respect to the true environment, the neutral video is often in disagreement, suggesting that the current unified backbones may not be capable of correct reasoning, internal consistency, and external physical fidelity all at once.

We study audio-visual conflict as a compositional generalization test for AV-LLMs: the model must combine synchronized but semantically incompatible audio and video evidence and decide whether the pair matches. On VideoLLaMA 2-7B-AV, three alignment configurations remain nearchance on the scored exact-string Yes/No subset of AVHBench, even though their output priors shift substantially. Similarly, off-the-shelf InternVideo2 experienced a 32.3% accuracy decrease specifically under cross-modal conflict, accompanied by a 17.3% instruction-following failure. We call this failure mode prior dominance: late-layer commitment to an internally preferred answer pattern that is weakly grounded in the conflicting inputs. To explain this behavior, we conduct a mechanistic interpretability analysis and find that commitment remains concentrated at 25.5 $\pm$ 1 layers. We show that stronger temporal alignment changes answer bias, but do not improve compositional conflict resolution. Code and data to reproduce our mechanistic audit and behavioral evaluations are available at https://github.com/AdarshSudheer09/AVHBench-dmai.

Multimodal large language models often generate reasoning chains containing subtle errors that lead to incorrect answers. Current verification approaches have notable limitations. Existing approaches either require expensive labelled supervision with inconsistent cross-task performance or aggregate scores from multiple sources by simple aggregations, missing a key insight: when these scores disagree, that disagreement itself carries important information about whether a reasoning step is truly valid or not. We formalise this as a coupled scoring problem among disparate, frozen verifiers, interpretable as a coordination game with a unique closed-form equilibrium where agreement signals valid steps while disagreement reveals instability. Towards this end, we propose a training-free domain-agnostic step-wise verification approach we call VERDICT: VERification via Disagreement-Informed Coupled Thresholding. To our knowledge, VERDICT is the first training-free verifier that makes the structure of cross-modal disagreement explicit and actionable. It computes consensus scores through a closed-form solution, enabling both disagreement-aware filtering and stability-conscious ranking of reasoning steps. Evaluated across six benchmarks, \method consistently improves over the base model by up to +5.95%, and performs competitively with domain-specific critics that demand extensive supervision, demonstrating that cross-modal agreement provides robust verification signals without task-specific adaptation and Training-Free Verification

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on multimodal benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they genuinely reason about relationships between images and text or rely on superficial correlations, known as shortcut learning. This question is particularly important for multimodal sarcasm detection, where successful prediction depends on recognizing pragmatic incongruity rather than treating sarcasm as simple image-text mismatch. We introduce PragMatch, a controlled benchmark of 3,000 image-text pairs derived from MMSD2.0, including original sarcastic examples and constructed literal and hard-negative pairs. We identify influential shortcut cues through systematic masking and evaluate their impact through targeted injection experiments. Our results show that LVLM predictions are sensitive to lexical, OCR-derived and stylistic cues, with injected surface signals causing substantial changes in model predictions despite unchanged underlying image-text relationships. Our findings reveal limitations in current LVLMs while PragMatch provides a systematic testbed for evaluating multimodal pragmatic reasoning beyond surface-level image-text alignment.

Fake news increasingly relies on cross-modal image-text forgeries, making transparent and verifiable reasoning chains an urgent need for Detecting and Grounding Multi-Modal Media Manipulation (DGM4). Existing methods produce black-box detection results without any decision rationale, limiting their reliability in forensic practice. Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offer a natural path toward explainability, but applying them to DGM4 raises two difficulties. First, models tend to generate explanations disconnected from predicted evidence locations, producing unverified attribution. Second, enforcing evidence-conclusion consistency requires active optimization, yet uniform training signals fail to distinguish localization tokens from classification tokens, making multi-head joint training unreliable. We propose a multi-modal manipulation detector based on an Evidence-Grounded Forensic Reasoning (EFR) framework. EFR introduces an Anchor-and-Verify reasoning chain that enforces modality-isolated perception before cross-modal comparison, with conclusion coordinates as explicit anchors to which downstream evidence must spatially correspond. A verifiable reward system then enforces evidence-conclusion consistency during training, while a Modality-Decoupled Advantage (MDA) routing mechanism mitigats credit misassignment across prediction tasks. Experiments show that EFR achieves state-of-the-art performance while producing structured forensic reasoning records that explicitly bind explanations to evidence.

Multimodal emotion recognition often treats self-reported labels as reliable supervision while overlooking self-report unreliability and cross-modal conflict. We propose \textbf{CONFER}, a graph-based conflict-aware evidence negotiation framework for weakly supervised multimodal emotion recognition. CONFER represents each modality expert as a node with a predictive belief, boundary-based uncertainty, and runtime reliability estimated from historical out-of-fold performance and current-sample uncertainty. Uncertainty-aware compatibility and reliability-directed asymmetric edge weights govern iterative message-passing negotiation, followed by peer-supported prediction readout. Conflict reduction, residual disagreement, and mean modality uncertainty further characterize three regimes---Consensus, Dissent, and Ambiguity---for sample-specific weak-label calibration. We evaluate CONFER on AMIGOS, MAHNOB-HCI, and DEAP under subject-dependent 10-fold and strict leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) protocols. CONFER achieves competitive performance, reaching \textbf{0.873} accuracy on AMIGOS-V and \textbf{0.854} accuracy on MAHNOB-V under strict LOSO evaluation. Further analyses show larger negotiation gains on high-conflict samples and improved robustness to weak-label corruption, indicating that cross-modal conflict provides useful information for both directional modality coordination and supervision-reliability estimation.

Current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can process diverse sensory inputs, yet their reasoning remains heavily biased toward a dominant modality, resulting in brittle cross-modal reasoning. We introduce C$^3$PO, a benchmark of 3,404 samples spanning video, audio, image, and text, evaluating two abilities: information composition (fusing dispersed evidence) and counterfactual conflict (resolving deliberate contradictions). C$^3$PO's paired IC/CC structure and four-tier design enable targeted diagnosis of when and why cross-modal reasoning fails. Built through a fully automatic pipeline using 25 logically grounded templates, C$^3$PO reveals that while humans achieve 88.64% accuracy, the best model (Gemini-3.1-Pro) reaches only 73.17%, with open-source models collapsing under conflict. Through attention probes, we find 86-95% of failures stem from modality dominance: models commit to one modality while ignoring contradictory evidence, concentrating 87-95% of attention on text. Mid-layer attention entropy predicts correctness-sustained exploration succeeds, premature collapse fails. The 56-point accuracy gap between equally complex templates reveals that performance depends on modalities' structural roles in conflict resolution, not combinations. These findings show multimodal perception does not guarantee robust reasoning; architectures must enable sustained cross-modal attention to avoid premature

Multimodal intent recognition requires understanding not only what textual, acoustic, and visual signals share, but also how they disagree. Such disagreement is frequently class-informative; for example, lexical positivity accompanied by incongruent vocal or facial behavior may indicate sarcasm or taunting, yet most fusion methods either encourage modality alignment or treat inconsistency as uncertainty to be suppressed. We propose MACH (Modality Agreement- and Conflict-aware prototype Hypergraph), a hierarchical prototype-hypergraph framework that represents multimodal agreement and conflict as distinct, recurring relational structures. MACH progressively composes unimodal representations into bimodal and trimodal abstractions. At each applicable level, modality-composition anchors activate sparse agreement prototype hypergraphs that capture reusable consensus patterns, while a separate conflict pathway maps cross-modal discrepancies to dedicated conflict prototype hypergraphs. The two pathways are combined through a feature-wise, sample-adaptive arbitration mechanism, enabling the model to preserve informative disagreement while suppressing incidental modality noise. A progressive optimization strategy stabilizes the interdependent hierarchy before joint agreement-conflict learning. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed formulation, while component and robustness analyses validate the distinct roles of hierarchical composition, prototype-mediated semantic refinement, and agreement-conflict arbitration.

Vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit strong generalization across multimodal tasks but remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations. Existing attacks typically follow single-trajectory gradient optimization or task-specific objectives, limiting search-space exploration and cross-task transferability. We propose an evolutionary-computation-guided cross-modal attack framework for unified VLMs. The framework adaptively searches both textual and visual spaces. On the textual side, it evolves hard negative semantic embeddings around the source-category representation to provide diverse cross-modal repulsion. On the visual side, it maintains a population of object-region perturbations and combines momentum-based gradient updates with evolutionary selection, mutation, and crossover to more reliably explore multiple feasible trajectories. Jointly optimizing semantic negative guidance and localized perturbations generates adversarial examples that consistently shift source-object semantics toward target categories across vision-language tasks. Theoretical analyses show that the co-evolutionary search preserves perturbation feasibility, prevents degradation of the best observed fitness, and increases the probability of reaching high-margin adversarial regions compared with single-trajectory optimization. Experiments on Florence-2, OFA, and UnifiedIO-2 demonstrate strong overall attack performance across image captioning, object detection, region categorization, and object localization. Ablation studies further verify the complementary effectiveness of text-side semantic evolution and image-side perturbation evolution, as well as the framework's efficiency and cross-task transferability.

Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) are conflicting affective states that precede the delay or abandonment of health behaviour change. Recognition of A/H at the video level is difficult, since the signal arises from disagreement across and within facial, vocal, linguistic, and bodily modalities, and manifests differently across individuals. The proposed PRISM-AH (Predictive Reasoning over Interacting Streams for Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition), is a framework that treats A/H as a multimodal conflict that unfolds over time. Frozen vision, audio, and text encoders are aligned into short time windows and passed to a lightweight streaming model that scores cross-modal dissonance, predicts each next window to expose a hesitation surprise signal, discovers behaviour prototypes, and is conditioned on participant metadata. Dense window-level annotations supervise the model as an auxiliary objective, and the decision threshold is calibrated for macro F1. A knowledge-guided large language model then reasons over structured evidence using the expert cue taxonomy of the dataset, and its verdict is fused late only when validation performance improves. On the labelled public test partition of 525 videos, PRISM-AH attains a macro F1 of 0.6133, compared to the reported zero-shot baseline of 0.2827. The reasoning gain is validated to transfer from validation to the larger test partition.

Wikipedia and Wikidata are widely used for information access, LLM pre-training, and retrieval-augmented generation. Their knowledge is deeply connected but scattered across text, tables, and knowledge graphs. This raises a practical question: when these modalities disagree, how can we detect and explain the conflict? We study this problem as modality-level inconsistency detection. We first introduce a taxonomy of cross-modal knowledge inconsistencies, covering information granularity differences, direct conflicts, temporal changes, and KG incompleteness. We then present Kontrast, an automatic framework that uses Text-to-SPARQL and LLM reasoning to compare table-based answers with KG evidence and categorize the resulting inconsistencies. Experiments on various Table-QA datasets show that cross-modal inconsistencies are common and informative. They reveal not only true knowledge conflicts, but also missing KG structure and temporal mismatches while being limited by Text-to-SPARQL errors and noise. Our analysis shows that text, tables, and KGs can complement and correct one another through systematic comparison. Kontrast provides a practical tool for large-scale knowledge auditing and establishes a benchmark for future work on cross-modal knowledge consistency. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ECLADATTA/KONTRAST.

Existing token compression methods for omnimodal large language models typically rely on one modality to determine what to retain in the other. We show that this assumption often breaks down: for the same query, audio and video relevance often peaks at different moments. This cross-modal salience mismatch makes unidirectional guidance prone to discarding answer-critical cues under aggressive compression. We propose OmniScope, a training-free token compression framework that uses the query as a shared semantic anchor while estimating relevance separately for audio and video. OmniScope allocates modality-specific token budgets, prunes visual tokens with an anchor-delta strategy that preserves both global context and temporal changes, and merges audio tokens within each second to reduce redundancy while maintaining temporal continuity. Across four audio-video benchmarks and two Qwen2.5-Omni model scales, OmniScope achieves the best average accuracy across all compression settings. At 25% overall token retention, it delivers up to 3.53x prefill speedup and more than 15% GPU memory reduction, with only a 0.35-point drop in average accuracy. These results suggest a simple design principle for OmniLLM inference: share the query across modalities, but not the salience estimates. The code is available at https://github.com/MAC-AutoML/OmniScope.

Multimodal agentic search systems increasingly rely on external tools to answer knowledge-intensive visual questions. However, existing evaluations mainly focus on final-answer accuracy and may miss failures in the search trajectory. In this work, we study such hidden reliability issues as silent failures. We introduce a six-category taxonomy covering modality shortcuts, phantom grounding, wrong-evidence-right-answer cases, over-retrieval laundering, cross-modal contradiction, and provenance hallucination. Based on this taxonomy, we build a trajectory-level diagnostic pipeline that evaluates both answer correctness and evidence-grounding quality under a unified ReAct-style scaffold. Experiments on MMSearch-Plus trajectories across four frontier multimodal models show that surface accuracy consistently overestimates true trajectory-level correctness. We further use cross-judge validation, blank-image stress tests, and tool ablations to show that silent failures are capability-dependent and often shift rather than disappear. Home-page: https://github.com/DingWu1021/silent-failures-multimodal-agentic-search

Multimodal sarcasm and cyberbullying detection remain challenging because the intended meaning often emerges from incongruity between textual and visual information rather than from either modality alone. Existing multimodal approaches primarily rely on feature fusion or cross-modal attention, which may not effectively capture hierarchical semantic inconsistencies across different levels of representation. To address this limitation, this paper proposes HCIG (Hierarchical Cross-modal Incongruity Graph Network), a novel framework that models cross-modal incongruity at token, phrase, and global levels using graph attention networks and adaptively integrates these representations through a learned hierarchical attention mechanism. As a complementary architecture, we also introduce GCCN (Graph-based Cross-modal Contradiction Network), which performs graph-based reasoning using contradiction-aware pooling for efficient multimodal interaction learning. The proposed models are evaluated on the MMSD sarcasm benchmark and the MultiBully cyberbullying dataset, together with comprehensive ablation studies and cross-task transfer experiments. Experimental results demonstrate that HCIG achieves the best performance on MMSD with 85.74% accuracy and 85.29% macro-F1, while GCCN attains the highest macro-F1 (68.66%) on MultiBully and HCIG achieves the highest accuracy (69.62%) and bullying-class F1 (74.90%). The findings demonstrate that hierarchical multi-granularity incongruity modeling provides more effective multimodal reasoning than conventional fusion strategies, offering a robust framework for sarcasm and cyberbullying detection in social media.

Detecting ambivalence and hesitancy (AH) in unconstrained video is challenging because the target signal is inherently ambiguous and expressed through subtle cross-modal incongruence rather than prototypical affect. We present CF-Net, a deep multimodal network submitted to the 3rd Edition of the AH Video Recognition Challenge (ABAW 11th, ECCV 2026), targeting the BAH dataset. CF-Net encodes visual, audio, and transcript streams with frozen SigLIP2, HuBERT, and DistilBERT backbones, normalises backbone features per speaker to reduce identity leakage, and fuses them via a ConflictFusion module that explicitly computes pairwise cross-modal incongruence. Training combines certainty-weighted focal loss, manifold mixup, and modality dropout; an auxiliary certainty-regression head uses ambiguity annotations to stabilise learning on genuinely borderline samples. CF-Net achieves a Macro F1 of 0.7155 on the BAH validation set and 0.7364 (AP = 0.7439) on the private challenge test set.

Multimodal emotion-cause pair extraction (MECPE) requires reliable pair confidence over candidate pairs. Existing pair scorers commonly use pair-level cross entropy over valid candidates, which treats links mostly independently. This leaves the relative confidence geometry among competing causes under-constrained, allowing gold pairs to stay close to hard negatives or rely on incidental non-gold context. We study this vulnerability as pair-confidence brittleness and propose RPCL (Robust Pair Confidence Learning), a training-only framework for pair-confidence learning. RPCL encourages pair confidence to be both discriminative and stable: gold pairs are separated from row-wise hard negatives through a confidence-difference margin constraint, and clean pair predictions are aligned with predictions from a corrupted view where non-gold contextual utterance representations are partially corrupted. The original clean pair scorer and decoding pipeline are used unchanged at inference time. On ECF, MECAD, and MEC4, RPCL improves the three-seed mean Pair F1 over a matched base model by 2.58 to 2.83 percentage points in the full text-audio-video setting, and improves mean Pair AUPRC on all three datasets. Diagnostic analysis further shows larger gold-negative confidence gaps and lower margin-violation severity. These results suggest that explicitly shaping pair confidence is an effective training strategy for MECPE.

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR)-assisted optical cloud removal aims to recover surface information obscured by clouds in optical remote sensing images by exploiting complementary SAR observations. Existing multimodal fusion methods typically rely on direct spatial concatenation and pixel-wise supervision, which can propagate SAR speckle noise into optical reconstruction and lead to over-smoothed results. To address these limitations, we propose an Information Bottleneck-driven High-Fidelity Network (IB-HFN) for SAR-assisted optical cloud removal. IB-HFN employs a dual-stream backbone to preserve modality-specific representations before deep semantic fusion, thereby mitigating premature cross-modal contamination. At the fusion stage, we introduce a Spatial Information Bottleneck Fusion module that compresses SAR features through a channel-wise variational information bottleneck to suppress unstructured speckle noise. In parallel, a local-global gating mechanism predicts clear-sky regions and routes reliable optical details through a Dirac-initialized skip connection, decoupling noise suppression from texture preservation. We further develop a joint optimization strategy that integrates feature-level bottleneck regularization with image-level constraints on reconstruction accuracy, structural consistency, spectral fidelity, and contrastive sharpness. A dynamic weighting schedule balances these objectives to stabilize training and reduce hazy artifacts. Experiments on the SEN12MS-CR dataset under challenging spatio-temporal splits demonstrate that IB-HFN achieves superior structural preservation and spectral fidelity over existing methods.

Multimodal fake news detection aims to identify the authenticity of news. Existing multimodal fake news detection methods mainly focus on cross-modal consistency, but often fail to explicitly model the semantic incongruity that characterizes deceptive multimodal content. However, misinformation often contains semantic information incongruity with the facts. To address these challenges, we propose Incongruity-aware Distribution Optimization (IDO) to improve the performance of fake news detection from the perspectives of factual incongruity and modality incongruity. For factual incongruity, we introduce a channel-wise reweighting strategy to obtain semantically discriminative embeddings and utilize gaussian distribution to model the uncertain correlation caused by factual incongruity. For modality incongruity, we utilize incongruity contrastive learning to learn cross-modal semantic information. Experiments demonstrate that IDO achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Large multimodal models (LMMs) inherit the self-attention mechanism of pretrained language backbones, yet standard attention can exhibit suboptimal allocation, including cross-modal misallocation between textual and visual evidence and intra-visual imbalance among visual tokens. We propose RAVE (Re-Allocating Visual Attention), a lightweight pair-gating mechanism that adds a learned query-key bias to pre-softmax attention scores over visual keys, derived from pre-RoPE query and key features. RAVE requires no architectural modification to the backbone and can be trained end-to-end with the rest of the model. Across a suite of multimodal benchmarks, RAVE improves over standard attention by an average of 3 points, with the largest gains on perception-intensive tasks -- including multilingual OCR, chart understanding, document VQA, and scene text VQA -- where accurate visual grounding is critical.

Multimodal representation alignment is pivotal for large language models and robotics. Traditional methods are often hindered by cross-modal information discrepancies and data scarcity, leading to suboptimal alignment spaces that overlook modality-unique features. We propose CodeBind, a framework that optimizes multimodal representation spaces through a modality-shared-specific codebook design. By incrementally aligning target and bridging modalities, CodeBind bypasses the need for fully paired data. Unlike traditional hard alignment, CodeBind decomposes features into shared components for semantic consistency and specific components for modality-unique details. This design utilizes a compositional vector quantization scheme, where a shared codebook bridges modality gaps and modality-specific codebooks mitigate representation bias by preventing dominant modalities from overshadowing others. Validated across nine modalities (text, image, video, audio, depth, thermal, tactile, 3D point cloud, EEG), CodeBind achieves state-of-the-art performance in multimodal classification and retrieval tasks.

The rapid advancement of Deepfake technologies and video manipulation tools poses a critical challenge to multimedia forensics, judicial evidence integrity, and information authenticity. Current detectors rely on single-modality signals, treating appearance, geometry, and motion independently. However, advanced generators maintain within-modality consistency while producing cross-modal contradictions, which are forensically discriminative but invisible to any single-modal detector. We propose CAM-VFD, a Cross-Attention Multimodal Video Forgery Detection framework that models cross-modal contradiction as a directional forensic signal. The framework uses a cross-attention fusion mechanism in which CLIP-based appearance representations serve as queries against VideoMAE motion features and MiDaS depth features, enabling the identification of contradictions between visual, temporal, and geometric evidence. We examine this design through cross-modal attention discrepancy analysis, observing statistically separable real and fake distributions ($p<0.001$, Cohen's $d=0.68$). Experimental results on two generative video benchmarks indicate consistent performance, with 95.31% Top-1 accuracy on GenVidBench and 93.43% accuracy, 90.63% F1-score, and 96.56% AUROC on GenVideo. Moreover, CAM-VFD demonstrates stable performance under compression, noise, blur, and adversarial perturbations, suggesting that cross-modal reasoning may improve robustness in media forensics. The code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/Hoda-Osama/CAM-VFD/tree/main}.

Humans typically use natural language to update teammates on task states. Since not all updates are communicated, discrepancies arise between the team members' mental models that negatively affect overall team performance. How can we categorize such discrepancies? Do misalignments detected in team dialogue predict future mental model misalignments? Traditional shared mental model (SMM) assessment methods rely on retrospective expert coding that cannot capture real-time coordination dynamics. We propose a framework to identify and categorize four types of mental model discrepancies: unsupported beliefs, false beliefs, belief contradictions, and omissions, all of which can naturally emerge in team dialogues. Using dialogues from twenty dyad teams performing collaborative object identification tasks across four sequential levels, we demonstrate that these discrepancy patterns contain predictive signals. Averaging historical discrepancy counts achieves meaningful prediction accuracy using uniform weighting as an exploratory baseline, with differential predictability across discrepancy types.

Multimodal sarcasm detection, which aims to precisely identify pragmatic incongruities between literal text and nonverbal cues, has gained substantial attention in multimodal understanding. Recent advancements have predominantly relied on naïve similarity-based attention mechanisms and uniform late fusion strategies.Furthermore, given that functional entanglement restricts traditional late fusions, we incorporate a scalar congruity routing mechanism and a prior-guided contextual graph. This mechanism anchors a generalized incongruity manifold through a two-stage asymmetric optimization driven by inconsistency-aware contrastive learning, selectively fusing only the most discriminative multi-granularity evidence. Extensive experiments on the \texttt{MUStARD} benchmark and its spurious-correlation-mitigated balanced datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves new state-of-the-art performance, surpassing the strongest multimodal baseline by a substantial 3.14% improvement in Macro-F1. By architecturally isolating atomic, composition, and contextual conflicts. This work provides a robust, decoupled paradigm for modeling subtle pragmatic incongruities in human communication.

Multimodal Emotion Recognition (MER) is critical for interpreting real-world interactions. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM) have shown promise in MER, their internal decision-making mechanisms under modality conflict and missingness remain largely underexplored. In this paper, to systematically investigate these behaviors, we introduce EmoMM, a comprehensive benchmark featuring modality-aligned, conflict, and missing subsets. Through extensive evaluation, we uncover a Video Contribution Collapse (VCC) phenomenon, where MLLM marginalize video evidence due to high token redundancy and modality preferences. To address this, we propose Conflict-aware Head-level Attention Steering (CHASE), a lightweight mechanism that detects modality conflicts and performs inference-time attention steering, effectively mitigating decision bias without retraining the backbone. Experimental results demonstrate that CHASE consistently improves performance across various settings, significantly enhancing the reliability of MLLM in complex affective scenarios.

Recent advances in video-to-audio (V2A) generation enable high-quality audio synthesis from visual content, yet achieving robust and fine-grained controllability remains challenging. Existing methods suffer from weak textual controllability under visual-text conflict and imprecise stylistic control due to entangled temporal and timbre information in reference audio. Moreover, the lack of standardized benchmarks limits systematic evaluation. We propose ControlFoley, a unified multimodal V2A framework that enables precise control over video, text, and reference audio. We introduce a joint visual encoding paradigm that integrates CLIP with a spatio-temporal audio-visual encoder to improve alignment and textual controllability. We further propose temporal-timbre decoupling to suppress redundant temporal cues while preserving discriminative timbre features. In addition, we design a modality-robust training scheme with unified multimodal representation alignment (REPA) and random modality dropout. We also present VGGSound-TVC, a benchmark for evaluating textual controllability under varying degrees of visual-text conflict. Extensive experiments demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across multiple V2A tasks, including text-guided, text-controlled, and audio-controlled generation. ControlFoley achieves superior controllability under cross-modal conflict while maintaining strong synchronization and audio quality, and shows competitive or better performance compared to an industrial V2A system. Code, models, datasets, and demos are available at: https://github.com/xiaomi-research/controlfoley.

Multimodal fusion requires integrating information from multiple sources that may conflict depending on context. Existing fusion approaches typically rely on static assumptions about source reliability, limiting their ability to resolve conflicts when a modality becomes unreliable due to situational factors such as sensor degradation or class-specific corruption. We introduce C$^2$MF, a context-specfic credibility-aware multimodal fusion framework that models per-instance source reliability using a Conditional Probabilistic Circuit (CPC). We formalize instance-level reliability through Context-Specific Information Credibility (CSIC), a KL-divergence-based measure computed exactly from the CPC. CSIC generalizes conventional static credibility estimates as a special case, enabling principled and adaptive reliability assessment. To evaluate robustness under cross-modal conflicts, we propose the Conflict benchmark, in which class-specific corruptions deliberately induce discrepancies between different modalities. Experimental results show that C$^2$MF improves predictive accuracy by up to 29% over static-reliability baselines in high-noise settings, while preserving the interpretability advantages of probabilistic circuit-based fusion.