Discriminative Models

Software clones are fragments of code that are similar or functionally equivalent to each other. They pose significant challenges for maintenance, refactoring, and bug detection. Detecting Type-IV clones, which are semantically equivalent but may differ syntactically, is particularly difficult for traditional token- or syntax-based methods. Recent machine learning approaches rely on contrastive learning, which requires careful negative sampling and can introduce bias. In this paper, we propose LWVIC4Code, a non-contrastive representation learning approach specifically designed for Type-IV clone detection. Building on the Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization (VICReg) framework and prior layer-wise VICReg training, LWVIC4Code introduces cross-layer consistency regularization and depth-dependent layer weighting to progressively refine semantic information across transformer layers, producing robust and discriminative code representations. We conduct an empirical study comparing LWVIC4Code against a contrastive learning baseline and zero-shot large language models on Python (Kamino) and multi-language (GPTCloneBench) datasets. Results show that LWVIC4Code achieves competitive or superior performance without negative samples, benefits from layer-wise supervision, and generalizes effectively from Python to other languages, particularly Java and C#. These results demonstrate that non-contrastive, layer-wise representation learning is a promising direction for robust semantic code clone detection.

Integrating generative adversarial networks (GANs) into federated semantic communication (SemCom) is a natural progression, as generative priors can recover semantic fidelity under channel distortion that discriminative decoders cannot. However, naive GAN federation introduces three failure modes that prior work has, to the best of our knowledge, neither identified nor resolved: discriminator aggregation instability under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data, semantic drift caused by divergent local embedding spaces, and channel-agnostic generation that cannot adapt to heterogeneous link conditions. We propose federated generative semantic communication (FedGenSC), which mitigates all three by employing a global generator with local-only discriminators, providing cross-client semantic information through a semantic prototype bank, and conditioning generation on the instantaneous signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Experiments on the Europarl dataset over Rayleigh fading channels (K=10 clients, Dirichlet α=0.5) show that FedGenSC under non-IID data outperforms the FedDeepSC baseline across the tested SNR range, achieving up to a 58.2% relative improvement in bilingual evaluation understudy (BLEU)-1 at 18 dB. Ablation studies confirm the independent contribution of each component.

Fair representation learning with a continuous sensitive attribute $S$ requires a representation $Z$ that is statistically independent of $S$. Existing criteria, including generalized demographic parity, the expectation of integral probability metrics (EIPM), and mutual information, enforce this independence by averaging a per-value discrepancy between the conditional law $P_{Z \mid S=s}$ and the marginal $P_Z$ over the law of $S$. This approach requires a nonparametric surrogate for the conditional law at each sensitive value. We propose evaluating independence through a single joint discrepancy $d\left(P_{Z, S}, P_Z \otimes P_S\right)$ between the joint law and the product of its marginals. We establish a disintegration identity; on decomposable witness classes it equals the conditional-integral functional that EIPM and generalized demographic parity instantiate. By reaching the same target without the conditional law, this discrepancy can be estimated directly from samples via a dependence statistic rather than conditional smoothing. We take the Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) as an instance of the joint discrepancy $d$ to investigate the statistical efficiency of replacing the conditional formulation. The HSIC estimator is a closed-form $O\left(n^2\right)$ statistic that converges at the $O\left(n^{-1 / 2}\right)$ rate, in contrast to the nonparametric $O\left(n^{-2 / 5}\right)$ rate of the conditional-route estimators. We prove this instance is equivalent to the conditional maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) integral up to an explicit spectral tail. The corresponding algorithmic implementation, i.e., FRHSIC, attains fairness-accuracy tradeoffs comparable to conditional-route basel es while reducing per-epoch training time.

Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) encode signals as the weights of a coordinate-based neural network and have recently been proposed as an alternative domain for downstream learning. While promising, classification directly in weight space remains challenging due to the high dimensionality and complex structure of INR parameters. Furthermore, the way discriminative information is distributed across INR weights remains poorly understood. We propose a hierarchical Mixture-of-Experts (HMoE) Transformer that processes INR weights using conditional computation aligned with the structure of the underlying implicit network. Coupled with a meta-learning framework that shapes INR parameters for downstream tasks, our model achieves state-of-the-art accuracy across standard benchmarks, ranging from low-resolution datasets to high-resolution ImageNet-1K. To gain insight into how INRs encode discriminative information, we develop weight-space attribution and pruning methods that identify parameters most relevant for classification. These analyses reveal how class-specific structure emerges within INR layers and support the suitability of MoE architectures for weight-space learning. Our approach advances both the performance and interpretability of weight-space classifiers.

We prove the identifiability of deep generative models (DGMs) with piecewise-affine (PWA) decoders and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) priors, in a purely unsupervised setting. We introduce three algebraic contrast principles for symmetry breaking: domain contrast, which trivializes the mixture symmetry group; mechanism contrast, which ensures every decoder branch is witnessed by a unique boundary; and interaction contrast, which forbids parameter conspiracies between latent components and decoder branches. Together they exploit the interplay between the discrete combinatorics of the PWA map and the continuous symmetry structure of the latent GMM. Continuity is replaced by algebraic symmetry conditions; injectivity is decoupled from structural identification and required only for pointwise inversion. Our results form a hierarchy: from law identifiability (LID; latent distribution up to a global affine map) through map identifiability (MID; decoder up to the same map) to posterior and pointwise identifiability. The ICA-form ambiguity emerges under conditions on diagonal component covariances. Assumptions are only on the data-generating process, not on learning methods, except for the interaction contrast. To our knowledge this is the first to make algebraic symmetry-breaking the engine of nonlinear identifiability, the first to admit discontinuous decoders, and the first to handle fully non-injective decoders, where every observation admits multiple latent codes.

Currently, most foundation models can reproduce or strongly depend on copyrighted training content, but output similarity alone is insufficient for infringement detection, because similar outputs may also arise from public-domain concepts, common stylistic conventions, or ordinary statistical generalization. In this paper, we develops a unified post-hoc detection framework that treats copyright infringement evidence as a counterfactual conditional distribution shift: a protected target is suspicious when the model's behavior under aligned conditions would change measurably if that target were included in, or removed from, the training process. We formalize this view through conditional differential privacy and introduce Dual-Branch Conditional Sensitivity (DCS), an operational statistic that measures the observable gap between two locally perturbed model states. Specifically, the proposed DCS framework creates a learning branch and an unlearning branch around the deployed model, connects their displacement to the unavailable counterfactual retraining effect through influence-function analysis, and bounds the observable sensitivity by the counterfactual privacy-budget surrogate, local curvature, training-set scale, and perturbation step size. To distinguish target-specific memorization from generic fine-tuning instability, we further define a calibrated detection statistic that subtracts the sensitivity measured under orthogonal conditions. The DCS framework is instantiated for ridge-regularized linear regression, conditional diffusion models, autoregressive language models, and multimodal models. These instantiations show how the same principle can be evaluated through prediction gaps, image-embedding divergence, token-distribution or entropy shifts, and cross-modal representation changes.

In this work, we introduce CoCo, a loss function aimed at learning normalized and well-structured representations. The proposed loss encourages intra-class collapse and inter-class contrast while preserving sufficient flexibility for neural networks to approximate geometrically optimal embeddings with large angular separation between classes. We provide a theoretical analysis positioning CoCo with respect to related objectives such as dot regression and cross-entropy, showing that the new proposed loss benefits from closer initialization to the optimal configuration, more informative gradients, and stronger incentives for class-wise representation collapse. Extensive experiments on diverse tabular datasets from the OpenML-CC18 benchmark show that CoCo achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art methods, including kernel SVM, Random Forest, dot regression, and cross-entropy-based neural networks. In addition, both theoretical arguments and empirical analyses demonstrate that the proposal promotes tighter class clustering and faster convergence. These results highlight CoCo loss as an effective objective for learning discriminative representations while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

Foundation models trained on biased datasets often rely on spurious correlations between target labels and non-causal attributes, resulting in poor generalization on minority groups. Bias mitigation remains challenging due to two fundamental issues. First, when group labels are unavailable, existing group-unsupervised methods typically infer spurious attributes implicitly from model behavior, making it difficult to identify spurious factors that are semantically aligned with real-world biases. Second, even with pseudo spurious supervision, most existing debiasing methods follow a single-branch design that operates within a single shared feature space, where target and spurious attributes are intrinsically entangled. To address the first challenge, we introduce Confidence-guided Bias Concept Mining (CBCM), which leverages diffusion-disentangled, semantically grounded concept representations to identify reliable spurious attributes without attribute annotations. To address the second challenge, we propose Dual-branch Cross-projection Debiasing (DCD), a prompt-tuning framework that separates target and spurious representations into two branches and explicitly removes spurious information through cross null-space projection while preserving target-relevant semantics. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that our method achieves state-of-the-art worst group accuracy among group-unsupervised approaches, while tuning at most 0.22% of the model parameters. The source code is available in the supplementary materials.

Classifier guidance is a way to control diffusion generation by using a noise-conditioned classifier to steer the sampling process toward a target class. One drawback of classifier guidance is that it requires two separately trained models: a classifier and a diffusion model. We therefore study a more compact alternative in which a conventionally trained speech classifier is repurposed as the backbone for diffusion generation. Starting from a frozen noise-conditioned classifier in log-Mel space, we attach a lightweight subnetwork that reuses intermediate classifier representations and train only this subnetwork under a Denoising Score Matching objective. Our work shows that a pretrained classifier can be repurposed for conditional generation, providing an appealing bridge between discriminative modeling and conditional speech synthesis resulting in high speech quality within a single-backbone model, with reduced memory footprint and computational cost.

We present a safe, real-time algorithm for active fault diagnosis and model discrimination for uncertain continuous-time nonlinear systems with process and measurement disturbances. Given a finite set of candidate models representing nominal and faulty modes, including actuator and sensor faults, we formulate an output-feedback, time-varying policy optimization problem that (i) robustly enforces state-input safety constraints over a finite horizon and (ii) drives the system to produce sampled measurements consistent with at most one model, enabling deterministic diagnosis. To solve this problem in real time, we develop a tractable approximation using interval over-approximations of reachable state and output sets, and encode diagnosability via a differentiable objective that penalizes overlap between the reachable output sets of possible models. The resulting optimization is solved efficiently online with gradient-based methods using JAX and differentiable reachability primitives. We evaluate our method on sensor and actuator fault diagnosis (up to 11 fault modes) in several high-dimensional nonlinear robotic systems, including a simulated quadrotor and fighter-jet model, a hardware differential-drive robot, and quadrupedal navigation. Across these case studies, our approach achieves reliable model discrimination in under 50 ms, outperforming baselines in discrimination success rate and speed while providing formal safety guarantees.

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become an effective post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models. However, existing RLVR methods typically rely on final-answer correctness to assign trajectory-level rewards, providing sparse supervision and treating all tokens uniformly regardless of their actual contribution to reasoning. Although recent studies introduce intermediate signals such as process rewards, high-entropy tokens, and semantic uncertainty, these signals are often not inherently verifiable and may fail to distinguish beneficial strategic patterns from harmful ones. To address this limitation, we propose STRIDE (Strategic Trajectory Reasoning with Discriminative Estimation), a fine-grained RLVR framework that derives strategic reasoning supervision from verifiable outcomes. STRIDE contrasts successful and failed trajectories within each response group to estimate the outcome-discriminative preference of each $n$-gram strategic pattern, and further combines this signal with reasoning saliency entropy to identify decision-relevant strategic patterns. These patterns are assigned differentiated advantage values during RL optimization, enabling more precise credit assignment while preserving the verifiability of RLVR. Extensive experiments demonstrate that STRIDE consistently improves reasoning performance across diverse models, tasks, and extended settings, including VLMs and agent-based systems.

Activation steering has emerged as a key methodology for controlling the behavior of large language models (LLMs). Existing difference-in-means based methods, however, are fundamentally limited: they capture only mean differences between class activations and fail to recover discriminative signals that naturally exist in the nonlinear feature subspace under the superposition hypothesis. Motivated by that, we propose High-Dimensional Random-projection for Activation Steering (HiDRA), a training-free approach that integrates seamlessly with existing activation steering methods. By performing activation addition in the projected high-dimensional space, HiDRA can provably capture a better discriminative structure beyond the reach of linear methods. Experiments across diverse LLM families and benchmarks demonstrate that HiDRA consistently outperforms baseline counterparts, achieving stronger behavioral control without significant computational overhead.

Learning systems based on IF-THEN rule representations readily offer interpretability, making them a crucial focus in contemporary AI research. A key objective for such rule sets is to achieve both high discriminative power and interpretability. While existing state-of-the-art algorithms implicitly prioritize predictive accuracy, they often fall short on one or more quality metrics that ensure interpretability, such as coverage and parsimony of rule sets. Motivated by this, this paper propose the development of CDPR, which aims to create highly accurate and interpretable rule sets for classification problems. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first attempt to establish such an approach. In this study, we introduce two algorithms rooted in submodular maximization, which not only provide provable guarantees on coverage but also yield rule sets that are both discriminative and parsimonious. We empirically demonstrate that rule sets learned through our approaches achieve higher accuracy and interpretability and has more than a 2.5-fold improvement in average coverage rates when compared to the next best algorithm.

While discriminative models for multi-channel speech separation excel in reference-based metrics, they often exhibit suboptimal human listening quality. To address this, we propose a novel MeanFlow-based one-step generative corrector (MeCo). MeCo learns a conditional average velocity field to map discriminative estimates directly onto the clean speech manifold in a single step. To maximize one-step generation performance, we introduce Data-Space Optimization (DSO). DSO integrates an $\mathbf{x}_r$-loss, which penalizes prediction errors on longer displacement intervals to serve as a generative objective for human listening quality, with an Endpoint SI-SDR loss that directly optimizes terminal signal fidelity. Experiments demonstrate that MeCo achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance with minimal computational overhead, simultaneously achieving superior signal fidelity and human listening quality in both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios.

Deep unsupervised domain adaptation (Deep UDA) methods successfully leverage rich labeled data in a source domain to boost the performance on related but unlabeled data in a target domain. However, algorithm comparison is cumbersome in Deep UDA due to the absence of accurate and standardized model selection method, posing an obstacle to further advances in the field. Existing model selection methods for Deep UDA are either highly biased, restricted, unstable, or even controversial (requiring labeled target data). To this end, we propose \textit{Deep Embedded Validation} (\textbf{DEV}), which embeds adapted feature representation into the validation procedure to obtain unbiased estimation of the target risk with bounded variance. The variance is further reduced by the technique of control variate. The efficacy of the method has been justified both theoretically and empirically.

Despite strong average-case performance, deep learning models often exhibit systematic errors on specific population groups, known as error slices. Identifying these groups and the root causes of their failures is critical for model debugging and bias mitigation. However, existing error Slice Discovery Methods (SDMs) typically generate explanations disconnected from the model's inference process, thus only approximating the underlying error source and may be inaccurate. We address this limitation by leveraging Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), whose predictions are directly dependent on human-understandable semantic concepts. Since downstream task failures in CBMs commonly arise from concept mispredictions, concept representations provide a strong candidate for error slice identification, offering fine-grained explanations directly linked to the error source. Building on this insight, we introduce CB-SLICE, a concept-based SDM that groups samples with shared concept prediction failures and identifies the keyword concepts most responsible for each slice's failure mode. Across multiple benchmarks, we show that CB-SLICE outperforms state-of-the-art methods in uncovering well-known biases while providing richer and more faithful explanations of model errors.

The explosive growth of open-source model repositories has created a Model Jungle, where checkpoints are frequently shared without adequate documentation or metadata. While weight-space learning offers a pathway to identify and analyze these models directly from their parameters, processing full-scale weights is computationally prohibitive. Probing-based methods have emerged as a lightweight alternative, extracting permutation-equivariant representations via learnable probe vectors. However, existing probing methods are limited by a single-view design: they capture first-order structures but fail to encode the rich, higher-order correlation patterns inherent in row-column interactions. To bridge this gap, we introduce MVProbe, a multi-perspective probing framework that synthesizes first-order signals with interaction-aware (Gram-based) views. Our approach is theoretically grounded; we analyze the scaling laws of different probing orders to derive a principled standardization and fusion strategy that ensures balanced contributions from all branches. On the Model Jungle benchmark, MVProbe consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art ProbeX across diverse architectures, including discriminative backbones (ResNet, SupViT, MAE, DINO) and large-scale generative LoRA adapters (Stable Diffusion LoRA).

Masked Diffusion Language Models MDLMs replace autoregressive generation with iterative demasking and their privacy properties are largely unstudied. We study membership inference attacks MIA on fine tuned MDLMs and show they are significantly more vulnerable than current grey box baselines suggest. We extract a 46 dimensional feature vector from the models reconstruction loss at four masking ratios and train XGBoost and MLP classifiers on top. On the MIMIR benchmark across six text domains XGBoost achieves mean AUC 0.878 peaking at 0.930 on Pile CC and beats the SAMA grey box baseline by 0.062 AUC on average. A leave one signal out ablation shows that the ELBO trajectory alone drives most of this with a mean drop of 0.130 when removed while attention features add almost nothing below 0.003. We also design a shadow model transfer attack where K equals 3 surrogate MDLMs trained on data from unrelated domains generate classifier labels with no access to the target domain. This achieves 0.858 mean AUC within 0.020 of the white box oracle and establishes shadow model transfer as a practical and near equally effective attack path.

Software vulnerability detection is critical for ensuring software security and reliability. Despite recent advances in deep learning, real-world vulnerability datasets suffer from two severe challenges: frequency imbalance and difficulty imbalance. We reinterpret these challenges from an embedding geometry perspective, observing that such imbalances induce geometric distortions in hyperspherical representation space. To address this issue, we propose MARGIN, a metric-based framework that learns discriminative vulnerability representations through adaptive margin metric learning and hyperspherical prototype modeling. MARGIN dynamically adjusts geometric regularization according to the distribution structure estimated by the von Mises-Fisher concentration, aligning the probability mass of embedding distributions with their corresponding Voronoi cells, thereby reducing geometric distortion and yielding more stable decision boundaries. Extensive experiments on public vulnerability datasets show that MARGIN consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving notable improvements in classification and detection, especially on challenging, imbalanced datasets. Further analysis demonstrates that MARGIN produces more structured embedding geometries, improving robustness, interpretability, and generalization.

We provide a unified theoretical analysis of Linear Discriminant Analysis with simultaneous multilabel scatter matrix formulations and Stiefel orthogonality constraints. Our contributions span both algebraic structure and statistical guarantees. On the algebraic side, we characterize the rank of the multilabel between-class scatter matrix, showing that the effective discriminant dimensionality can strictly exceed the classical single-label bound of $C-1$; we establish a multilabel partition of variance and prove that all four Fisher objectives are equivalent under the $W^\top S_t^{ML} W = I_r$ constraint while characterizing their divergence under the Stiefel constraint; and we prove a two-sided label-distance preservation bound relating projected distances to Hamming distances in label space. On the statistical side, we establish a finite-sample $O(k_{\max}\sqrt{d\log d/n}/gap_r)$ bound on the subspace estimation error under sub-Gaussian noise with a matching $Ω(σ^2 d/(n\,gap_r))$ minimax lower bound, establishing a near-minimax-optimal rate (matching up to logarithmic and $k_{\max}$ factors) for multilabel discriminant subspace estimation. We further provide high-probability distance concentration, robustness guarantees under label interactions, and a regularization analysis preserving the spectral structure when $d \gg n$. All results are verified numerically on synthetic data generated from the linear label-effect model, covering both the algebraic identities and the multilabel-specific quantities ($k_{\max}$, $κ(S_t^{ML})$, $\|Γ/n\|_2$, $Δ_r$) that govern the statistical bounds. The numerical experiments are designed as a sanity check for the theorems rather than as an empirical benchmark; evaluation on real multilabel datasets is left to future work targeting application-oriented venues.

Imbalanced classification remains a pervasive challenge in machine learning, particularly when minority samples are too scarce to provide a robust discriminative boundary. In such extreme scenarios, conventional models often suffer from unstable decision boundaries and a lack of reliable error control. To bridge the gap between generative modeling and discriminative classification, we propose a two-stage framework \textbf{VAE-Inf} that integrates deep representation learning with statistically interpretable hypothesis testing. In the first stage, we adopt a one-class modeling perspective by training a variational autoencoder (VAE) exclusively on majority-class data to capture the underlying reference distribution. The resulting latent posteriors are aggregated via a Wasserstein barycenter to construct a global Gaussian reference model, providing a geometrically principled baseline for the majority class. In the second stage, we transform this generative foundation into a discriminative classifier by fine-tuning the encoder with limited minority samples. This is achieved through a novel distribution-aware loss that enforces probabilistic separation between classes based on variance-normalized projection statistics. For inference, we introduce a projection-based score that admits a natural hypothesis testing interpretation, allowing for a distribution-free calibration procedure. This approach yields exact finite-sample control of the Type-I error (false positive rate) without relying on restrictive parametric assumptions. Extensive experiments on diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate that our framework achieves competitive performance against other approaches. The codes are available upon request.

In large-scale distributed scenarios, increasingly complex tasks demand more intelligent collaboration across networks, requiring the joint extraction of structural representations from data samples. However, conventional task-specific approaches often result in nonstructural embeddings, leading to collapsed variability among data samples within the same class, particularly in classification tasks. To address this issue and fully leverage the intrinsic structure of data for downstream applications, we propose a novel distributed learning framework that ensures both diverse and discriminative representations. For independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) data, we reformulate and decouple the global optimization function by introducing constraints on representation variance. The update rules are then derived and simplified using a primal-dual approach. For non-i.i.d. data distributions, we tackle the problem by clustering and virtually replicating nodes, allowing model updates within each cluster using block coordinate descent. In both cases, the resulting optimal solutions are theoretically proven to maintain discriminative and diverse properties, with a guaranteed convergence for i.i.d. conditions. Additionally, semantic information from representations is shared among nodes, reducing the need for common neural network architectures. Finally, extensive simulations on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 confirm the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in capturing global structural representations.

Few-step generation has been a long-standing goal, with recent one-step generation methods exemplified by MeanFlow achieving remarkable results. Existing research on MeanFlow primarily focuses on class-to-image generation. However, an intuitive yet unexplored direction is to extend the condition from fixed class labels to flexible text inputs, enabling richer content creation. Compared to the limited class labels, text conditions pose greater challenges to the model's understanding capability, necessitating the effective integration of powerful text encoders into the MeanFlow framework. Surprisingly, although incorporating text conditions appears straightforward, we find that integrating powerful LLM-based text encoders using conventional training strategies results in unsatisfactory performance. To uncover the underlying cause, we conduct detailed analyses and reveal that, due to the extremely limited number of refinement steps in the MeanFlow generation, such as only one step, the text feature representations are required to possess sufficiently high discriminability. This also explains why discrete and easily distinguishable class features perform well within the MeanFlow framework. Guided by these insights, we leverage a powerful LLM-based text encoder validated to possess the required semantic properties and adapt the MeanFlow generation process to this framework, resulting in efficient text-conditioned synthesis for the first time. Furthermore, we validate our approach on the widely used diffusion model, demonstrating significant generation performance improvements. We hope this work provides a general and practical reference for future research on text-conditioned MeanFlow generation. The code is available at https://github.com/AMAP-ML/EMF.

In principle, deep generative models can be used to perform domain adaptation; i.e. align the input feature representations of test data with that of a separate discriminative model's training data. This can help improve the discriminative model's performance on the test data. However, generative models are prone to producing hallucinations and artefacts that may degrade the quality of generated data, and therefore, predictive performance when processed by the discriminative model. While uncertainty quantification can provide a means to assess the quality of adapted data, the standard framework for evaluating the quality of predicted uncertainties may not easily extend to generative models due to the common lack of ground truths (among other reasons). Even with ground truths, this evaluation is agnostic to how the generated outputs are used on the downstream task, limiting the extent to which the uncertainty reliability analysis provides insights about the utility of the uncertainties with respect to the intended use case of the adapted examples. Here, we describe how decision-theoretic uncertainty quantification can address these concerns and provide a convenient framework for evaluating the trustworthiness of generated outputs, in particular, for domain adaptation. We consider a case study in photoplethysmography time series denoising for Atrial Fibrillation classification. This formalises a well-known heuristic method of using a downstream classifier to assess the quality of generated outputs.

Facial Expression Recognition (FER) is essential for human-machine interaction, as it enables machines to interpret human emotions and internal states from facial affective behaviors. Although deep learning has significantly advanced FER performance, most existing deep-learning-based FER methods rely heavily on discriminative classifiers for fast predictions. These models tend to learn shortcuts and are vulnerable to even minor distribution shifts. To address this issue, we adopt a conditional generative diffusion model and introduce the Emotion Diffusion Classifier (EmoDC) for FER, which demonstrates enhanced adversarial robustness. However, retraining EmoDC using standard strategies fails to penalize incorrect categorical descriptions, leading to suboptimal recognition performance. To improve EmoDC, we propose margin-based discrepancy training, which encourages accurate predictions when conditioned on correct categorical descriptions and penalizes predictions conditioned on mismatched ones. This method enforces a minimum margin between noise-prediction errors for correct and incorrect categories, thereby enhancing the model's discriminative capability. Nevertheless, using a fixed margin fails to account for the varying difficulty of noise prediction across different images, limiting its effectiveness. To overcome this limitation, we propose Adaptive Margin Discrepancy Training (AMDiT), which dynamically adjusts the margin for each sample. Extensive experiments show that AMDiT significantly improves the accuracy of EmoDC over the baseline model with standard denoising diffusion training under 100-step evaluations. Additionally, AMDiT-enhanced EmoDC has better generalization and robustness than state-of-the-art discriminative classifiers.

Among the different possible strategies for evaluating the reliability of individual predictions of classifiers, robustness quantification stands out as a method that evaluates how much uncertainty a classifier could cope with before changing its prediction. However, its applicability is more limited than some of its alternatives, since it requires the use of generative models and restricts the analyses either to specific model architectures or discrete features. In this work, we propose a new robustness metric applicable to any probabilistic discriminative classifier and any type of features. We demonstrate that this new metric is capable of distinguishing between reliable and unreliable predictions, and use this observation to develop new strategies for dynamic classifier selection.

Cross-subject motor imagery decoding remains a fundamental challenge in EEG-based brain-computer interfaces due to substantial inter-subject variability. Recent approaches have leveraged Riemannian geometry by representing EEG signals as covariance matrices on the symmetric positive definite (SPD) manifold. However, existing methods primarily focus on manifold-based representations while largely overlooking subject-specific variations in covariance dispersion and orientation. In this work, we address these challenges through geometry-aware congruence transformations and propose three complementary models: (i) Discriminative Congruence Transform (DCT), (ii) Deep Linear DCT (DLDCT), and (iii) Deep DCT-UNet (DDCT-UNet). The proposed models are evaluated both as manifold alignment modules for downstream classifiers and as end-to-end discriminative architectures optimized via cross-entropy with a custom logistic regression head. Experiments on challenging cross-subject motor imagery benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in transductive decoding performance, achieving 2-3% higher accuracy than strong baselines. These results highlight the effectiveness of geometry-aware congruence learning for mitigating inter-subject variability in EEG decoding.

Out-of-Distribution (OoD) detection aims to justify whether a given sample is from the training distribution of the classifier-under-protection, i.e., In-Distribution (InD), or from an unknown out distribution. Recent researches have leveraged Diffusion Models (DMs) for OoD detection due to their powerful distribution modeling capability. Given an input image, an InD-pretrained DM produces a corresponding InD-aligned counterpart, which serves as a generative reference for comparison. However, existing DM-based methods typically assess this underlying discrepancy through visual-level distances in the raw image space, which may be misaligned with the distributional discrepancy relevant to OoD detection. In this work, we investigate the fundamentals of discrepancy assessment in DM-based OoD detection, asking how the discrepancy between an input and its DM-generated counterpart should be formulated, and in which representation spaces and with which metrics it should be measured. To this end, we propose to assess the discrepancy in a classifier-relative manner by exploiting the representation spaces of the classifier-under-protection, whose training on InD data encodes rich task-relevant InD knowledge. In particular, we quantify two types of discrepancy: feature-level covariate discrepancy in deep feature representations and logit-level concept discrepancy in output logits, enabling effective differentiation between InD and OoD samples. Moreover, a subspace-based strategy is devised to refine representations of the DM generation to promote discrepancy assessment. Together, these designs form our novel detection framework, namely DDR. Extensive experiments on the challenging large-scale ImageNet-1K dataset demonstrate the superior detection performance of DDR over both DM-based and non-DM-based methods.

Providing various machine learning (ML) applications in the real world, concerns about discrimination hidden in ML models are growing, particularly in high-stakes domains. Existing techniques for assessing the discrimination level of ML models include commonly used group and individual fairness measures. However, these two types of fairness measures are usually hard to be compatible, and even two different group fairness measures might be incompatible as well. To address this issue, we investigate and evaluate the discrimination level of classifiers from a manifold perspective and propose a fairness measure named harmonic fairness via manifolds (HFM)'' based on distances between sets. Yet the direct calculation of distances might be too expensive to afford, reducing its practical applicability. Therefore, we devise an approximation algorithm named Approximation of distance between sets (ApproxDist)'' to facilitate accurate estimation of distances, and we further demonstrate its algorithmic effectiveness under certain reasonable assumptions. Empirical results indicate that the proposed fairness measure HFM reflects bias from both individual and group fairness aspects and that the proposed ApproxDist is effective and efficient.