Energy-Efficient ML

Emerging computer hardware often trades reliability for energy efficiency; here we show that large-language models (LLMs) can be trained to tolerate this unreliability, and that rather than degrading, their error resilience actually increases as they grow. Modified neural scaling laws inferred from 40,000 GPU-hours of training runs on simulated faulty digital hardware quantify this trend and suggest that models learn to compute within "good" error-correcting codes, whose relative overhead remains finite no matter how large the model gets. This finding leads us to conjecture that appropriately trained LLMs may be formally fault-tolerant; if true, running AI inference on low energy, faulty hardware may be a path to substantial energy savings over the status quo.

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies repeatedly invoke inference to control robots, making graphics processing unit (GPU) energy a recurring cost of task execution. Reducing energy per inference call, however, may not reduce energy per successful task if numerical errors increase failures or slower inference prolongs execution. We therefore target GPU energy per successful task while preserving task success and keeping the inference-latency increase within 10%. Our approach builds on two observations: quantization sensitivity varies across action classes, model layers, and weights versus activations; and numerical precision changes the workload, shifting favorable GPU operating points. We introduce ActTune, an action-aware framework that connects layer-wise precision allocation with workload-dependent GPU operating-point selection over requested frequency--power-cap pairs. A lightweight decision tree learns its splits and leaf precision configurations directly from configuration action errors, then selects precision before each policy call. The controller forecasts the next workload and applies the selected GPU operating point asynchronously using a lookup table calibrated under a latency budget. A shared resident quantized weight bank enables configuration switching without weight reconstruction or additional policy evaluations. On LIBERO, a benchmark for lifelong robot learning, ActTune improves mean task success by up to 2.3% relative to state of the art. Relative to the original BF16 implementations, it delivers up to $2.02\times$ faster inference and, with GPU operating-point adaptation, reduces energy per successful task by up to 76.8%.

Around 30% of global energy expenditure can be attributed to the building sector, where a large portion of energy-consumption could be avoided by repairing existing faults. Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) software addresses this issue; however, its creation and operation also have an environmental impact. The magnitude of this impact is influenced by the diagnosis architecture, as different architectures and methods have different energy demands. Yet, simply considering the energy consumed by the software itself is not sufficient to assess its overall environmental impact, since the diagnostic performance, e.g., number of detected faults or number of faults missed, also contributes to its ecological footprint. In this paper, we propose an energy-consumption model that considers FDD performance and energy spend directly by the diagnosis software. In an initial experiment, we compare several FDD architecture families, i.e., rule-based, model-based, classical machine learning, and large-language-model-based, in simulation using performance and energy-consumption values collected from prior literature. The results show that considering the computational energy and accuracy of FDD can change the relative benefit of the different approaches. Computationally efficient machine learning methods, such as random forest, provide the largest net savings on smaller buildings, whereas more resource-intensive approaches, such as fine-tuned large language models, become advantageous as building size increases. Our findings suggest that overall energy efficiency depends not only on the computational demand of the FDD software, but also on its diagnostic performance and the scale of the building.

The environmental impact of deep learning has attracted increasing attention over the past decade. Existing studies mainly focus on the energy and carbon emissions of model training and inference, while the whole development phase is often overlooked. Yet, architecture prototyping and intensive experiments are conducted during this stage, which is highly energy-demanding. In this article, we propose a methodology to estimate these costs, based on activity logs from the Grid5000 shared computing platform used by the LORIA laboratory. As a case-study, we focus on audio projects developed in the Multispeech research team. We evaluate the overall energy cost of four projects, and we compare them to those of training the reported models. Our results show that the energy required for the development phase is 3 to 256 times greater than that required to train the best-performing model alone. These results advocate for a more systematic reporting of energy consumption across the entire life cycle of deep learning-based audio projects.

As the capabilities and ubiquity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, so does their environmental footprint. Despite calls for responsible AI, the machine learning community lacks standardised practices for carbon accounting. Our automated literature review of the 5,285 papers accepted to NeurIPS 2025 reveals that reporting of environmental impact is nearly non-existent. To catalyse a shift toward sustainable AI, we define standardised sustainability metrics for evaluating model training efficiency, accompanied by simple heuristics to estimate the carbon cost of LLM inference. We implement these metrics in carbonbenchmark, a drop-in software solution for tracking and reporting emissions. Finally, to combat the pursuit of marginal accuracy gains at disproportionate environmental costs, we formalise the Smallest Model that Achieves the Job' (SMAJ), a framework which challenges the field to prioritise computational efficiency and environmental accountability alongside traditional State-of-the-Art' (SotA) accuracy.

Large language model (LLM) serving has environmental impacts across energy consumption, carbon emission, water consumption, and biodiversity loss. Yet these dimensions are largely evaluated in isolation, leaving it unclear when and how they lead to different optimization decisions. We present PRISM, a unified framework for characterizing and optimizing LLM serving across energy, carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts. Our analysis reveals a fundamental distinction: computing configurations determine energy consumption, whereas where and when LLM serving is deployed determine its carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts. Under a fixed deployment choice and operational-only accounting, all dimensions preserve the same energy-based configuration ranking. Deployment rankings can diverge across dimensions, while embodied impacts can break configuration invariance when they exceed a lifecycle crossover boundary. PRISM identifies these conditions, quantifies cross-dimensional regrets, and balances the four dimensions. In regional-routing experiments, PRISM reduces median worst-case regret by 50.2% relative to the strongest baseline.

Machine learning plays an increasingly vital role in engineering, but the corresponding increase in compute time is not without environmental cost. Physics-informed machine learning or "grey-box" models have been developed to overcome some of the limitations of traditional black-box learners, utilising the physical insight that an engineer would have about the structure they are modelling and have shown promising results in the structural engineering field among many others. This work explores whether an additional advantage could be a reduced environmental impact, considering the relationship between training data quantity and training time, linking this duration to carbon emissions from computing. In a structural health monitoring context, four physics-informed machine learning approaches - spanning Gaussian processes and neural networks - are evaluated: residual modelling, input augmentation, hybrid modelling, and constrained learning. The emissions for training each of the models to reach a given error threshold is compared, and in most examples, shown to be lower for the physics-informed models (with input augmented models being an exception). This reduction in training emissions further compounds the environmental savings achieved by collecting and storing less data. Although promising results, we cannot expect a silver bullet and the case studies demonstrate that a trade-off is needed between the increased complexity that comes from introducing physics into a machine learner, against the gain from reduced training data requirements.

Modern AI model training imposes unprecedented computational demands, making it a key contributor to datacenter energy consumption. Yet a significant fraction of the energy consumed during training does not translate to useful computation due to bottlenecks throughout the training pipeline. We present PAFT, a phase-aware, dynamically adaptable GPU frequency tuning system that reduces energy consumption of training workloads with minimal performance overhead. The key insight behind PAFT is that bottlenecks represent an energy optimization opportunity, rather than purely a performance problem: when GPUs are bound to stall, PAFT opportunistically reduces their clock frequencies to match the pace of bottlenecked devices, saving energy without impacting execution time. PAFT achieves this by continuously monitoring pipeline behavior and applying fine-grained frequency adjustments, adapting to workload and system changes. Experiments conducted on twelve widely used models show that PAFT consistently outperforms all baselines, achieving energy savings of up to 46% with an average overhead of 4%.

The intersection of open-source processor architectures and machine learning is driving the demand for customizable, efficient, and accessible hardware. This survey examines the state of the RISC-V ISA in machine learning applications, analyzing current capabilities, challenges, and future directions based on recent research. The analysis covers academic and commercial implementations, software frameworks, and real-world applications. The RISC-V machine learning ecosystem is evaluated, from instruction set extensions and core implementations to compiler optimizations and deployment strategies. Key contributions include a unified taxonomy of RISC-V ML implementations, a comparative analysis of performance and design trade-offs, an evaluation of software toolchain maturity, and the identification of emerging trends in instruction set extensions and specialized accelerators. Findings reveal progress in energy efficiency, specialized instruction development, and framework integration, while highlighting challenges in standardization, verification complexity, and ecosystem fragmentation. The analysis proposes four research directions to address current limitations: specialized neural processing extensions, adaptive and modular processor architectures, security frameworks, and energy-efficient multi-domain architectures. These directions provide a roadmap for advancing RISC-V as a foundational platform for next-generation machine learning systems.

As telecommunication networks evolve toward autonomous 5G-Advanced and 6G operations, agentic artificial intelligence (AI) workflows, where large language models (LLMs) execute multi-step reasoning, invoke diagnostic tools, retrieve domain knowledge, and coordinate across agent teams, are increasingly embedded across the edge-cloud continuum. While the biological brain accomplishes complex cognition on an exceptionally modest metabolic power budget of approximately 20W contemporary LLMs are profoundly energy- and memory-intensive, making sustainable lifecycle orchestration a critical operational priority. However, existing AI lifecycle metrics evaluate only isolated, single-model inferences or overlook multi-agent execution graphs entirely. Consequently, network operators lack foundational models to determine whether distributed agent communication incurs meaningful energy costs and where across edge-cloud tiers agent teams should physically reside. To address this gap, we introduce agentic-eCAL, generalizing the Energy Cost of AI Lifecycle (eCAL) metric to directed multi-agent workflows by coupling a closed-form two-rate single-call energy model (compute-bound prefill and memory-bound decode) with 7-layer OSI data transport. Grounded in hundreds of GPU benchmark configurations on NVIDIA A100 and H100, 16 open-weight models and 8 orchestration topologies, we validate components of the metric and study workflow placement implications. Our findings demonstrate that inter-agent text transport incurs 0.25% of workflow energy across 5G RAN, metro, and optical links. Therefore in edge-cloud agent placement the dominant energy cost of distribution is often not the transmission of inter-agent text itself, but the additional inference and context processing induced by that communication.

As artificial intelligence systems increasingly rely on distributed and collaborative training, the energy footprint of these processes becomes a shared responsibility. Modern AI training often unfolds across heterogeneous compute nodes-ranging from cloud clusters to edge devices-whose energy availability is spatially and temporally variable. At the same time, renewable energy grids experience growing levels of excess generation, creating opportunities to align computational workloads with low-carbon energy supply. In this work, we develop a game-theoretic model of carbon-aware AI training in which autonomous agents strategically choose whether to participate and how intensively to train under limited renewable energy availability. Each agent balances diminishing learning returns, rewards for remaining within green-energy budgets, and penalties for grid consumption. While our framework applies broadly to distributed AI training, we examine Federated Learning as a representative case study due to its decentralized structure and flexible scheduling. We analyze equilibrium existence, efficiency, and adaptive dynamics, and provide simulation evidence that appropriately designed incentives can eliminate grid-based energy usage while preserving model performance. Our findings demonstrate how incentive-compatible training mechanisms can enhance energy efficiency and sharply reduce carbon emissions under renewable-energy constraints.

Energy supply and heat dissipation are two of the main challenges with modern GPU deployments. While typically discussed in the context of new datacenter constructions, the same constraints also apply to small form-factor consumer devices, such as the DGX spark. In workloads characterized by alternating compute-intensive tasks such as matmuls with memory-bound operations such as norms or cross-entropy, the compute-intensive parts might hit power and/or thermal limits and start throttling. In this short paper, we show that chunking the workload into smaller parts that alternate compute and memory in higher frequencies, these power and temperature spikes can be smoothed out, preventing throttling and resulting in considerably faster wall-clock time and reduced total energy consumption. We present several scenarios in which this effect can be exploited on a DGX Spark with up to 2% performance and energy improvements, and demonstrate that the same phenomenon also happens on less constrained systems, such as a multi-GPU server, albeit at significantly reduced effect size of 1-2%.

Traditional TinyML systems for edge devices achieve high accuracy by relying on fixed-depth models that require a constant number of multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations regardless of the input complexity. This approach wastes critical resources in battery-powered Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices and limits the real-time performance of edge cyber-physical systems. Multi-exit execution schemes mitigate these issues and are widely used on high-end devices such as GPUs, but are rarely exploited on edge IoT devices because they require substantial rethinking given their strict memory and computational constraints. We address these aspects by designing and deploying, on an ultra-low-power GWT GAP9 System-on-Chip (SoC), a novel multi-exit computational scheme, demonstrating it on a MobileNetV2 convolutional neural network (CNN) for the ImageNet-100 classification task. Our approach introduces multiple exits at different CNN depths, each with a confidence-based gating mechanism that dynamically and autonomously decides whether to continue or stop inference. Comparing our multi-exit strategy to the standard MobileNetV2 on a GAP9 SoC, we show a 41% reduction in the average computational cost (from 313 MMAC to 185 MMAC), a 29% lower inference time (from 49 to 35 ms), and an energy saving of 24% (from 2.1 to 1.6 mJ per frame). All these improvements come with a ~1% loss in accuracy compared to the full-depth MobileNetV2, which achieves 80.5%. Finally, comparing our adaptable multi-exit scheme with a third-party state-of-the-art adaptive CNN, also deployed on the GAP9, we achieve more than 2x its computational efficiency, increasing it from 8.1 to 17.2 MAC/cycle.

The rapid diffusion of generative artificial intelligence raises privacy, latency, and performance concerns that motivate a shift toward "local-first" AI, where inferences are performed on the user's device instead of on remote cloud servers. This paradigm also places a significant computational load on battery-powered smartphones, potentially shortening battery life and increasing the overall replacement rate of mobile devices. This paper presents a systematic study of the energy consumption, performance, and accuracy of on-device large language model (LLM) inference. We evaluate 18 models from different model families, sizes, and quantization levels, on two modern smartphones and on a server, using the respective state-of-the-art for such deployments. We measure the energy per generated token, inter-token latency, model accuracy, and battery-cycle consumption. Our results show that (i) on-device inference is on average 3 times less energy-efficient than batched server inference; (ii) the relationship between quantization bit-width and energy per token is non-monotonic, with energy sweet spots on both tested smartphones; (iii) eight out of 18 model configurations lie on the Pareto front of accuracy and energy-efficiency, allowing practitioners to build battery-aware model routers; and (iv) realistic modeling assumptions do not allow local inference to be less environmentally impacting per token than batched server inference, with 88--90% of that impact attributable to device embodied carbon rather than electricity consumption. These findings challenge the premise that local AI is more sustainable than cloud inference, and motivate the need for context-aware and life-cycle-aware model selection when deploying edge AI on battery-powered mobile platforms.

Large language model (LLM) training is among the fastest-growing sources of electricity demand in modern data centers, and power availability is a primary bottleneck to continued AI infrastructure growth. Making the power consumption of these workloads flexible could unlock additional power for AI growth, limit increases in electricity prices, and improve the utilization of existing grid infrastructure. However, to realize this flexibility, we must first understand how the performance of training workloads changes when GPU power is reduced. This paper presents the first systematic characterization of \emph{job power elasticity} (the sensitivity of throughput to power reductions) in LLM training. To quantify elasticity, we introduce the \emph{Power Flexibility Index (PFI)}, a normalized metric that quantifies the performance cost of power reductions and provides a control primitive for SLA-aware power flexibility. We collect data from 131 LLM training runs on H200 (plus 24 H200 validation runs and 34 matched H100 runs), including both dense and mixture-of-experts models, pretraining and fine-tuning tasks, and up to 32 GPUs. We find that LLM training jobs exhibit substantial but variable power elasticity, and we identify telemetry signals that predict PFI at runtime. Finally, we demonstrate that PFI-aware power allocation maximizes total tokens/second throughput under power constraints. Under a 30% power reduction, PFI-aware power allocation recovers ~1.5k tokens/s per job, 63% of the performance gap between an equal-weight allocation and an oracle with perfect information. Our results establish power elasticity as a measurable property of training jobs and provide a foundation for power-aware, grid-responsive AI infrastructure.

As edge-based deep learning applications become more complex, optimizing performance on heterogeneous System-on-Chips (SoCs) presents unique challenges. Traditional pipelining techniques distributing the computation across different on-chip processing units, while effective for throughput, do not address the latency demands posed by modern neural networks with complex interdependencies and extensive operator parallelism. There is a potential in leveraging operator parallelism to enable concurrent execution across multiple processing units, thereby reducing inference latency. However, prioritizing pipelining or parallel execution often necessitates a compromise, where optimizing one performance metric adversely impacts the other. This paper introduces Para-Pipe, a hierarchical mapping framework that integrates intra- and inter-stage operator parallelism within a pipelined architecture. Para-Pipe navigates the trade-off between throughput and latency by selectively fine-tuning parallelism levels within and across pipeline stages. This strategy can significantly reduce inter-processor communication overhead, significantly improving energy efficiency. Our evaluation demonstrates that Para-Pipe generates multiple Pareto-optimal configurations, achieving a balance between throughput and latency on an Amlogic SoC equipped with ARM big.LITTLE CPUs and GPU, as well as the Black Sesame Technology SoC featuring a deep learning accelerator and two DSPs. More importantly, throughput-optimized configurations under Para-Pipe on Amlogic SoC show an average energy efficiency improvement of 11.0% over purely pipelined strategies and 23.3% relative to non-pipelined parallel execution.

Data centers are increasingly optimized by artificial intelligence and, at the same time, increasingly loaded by it. The literature treats these as two unrelated problems: control studies model workload as an exogenous arrival process, while sustainability studies model infrastructure as a fixed multiplier. We screen roughly 194 papers retrieved through a documented protocol, code 63 of them, and report what the coding shows. Of 28 primary control-oriented studies, 18 are validated in simulation alone and 5 reach physical hardware or a production facility; none account for water withdrawal, and none account for embodied carbon. Reported savings intervals across four technique families overlap almost completely, which means the field cannot presently rank its own methods. Ten recurring gaps are scored for consequence and tractability, and we set out CLEAR-DC, a framework coupling a control-policy branch to a workload-demand branch through an explicit elasticity term, reads out net rather than direct benefit, and emits a schema-conformant record covering energy, carbon, water, embodied share and validation venue. The framework is an architectural and methodological proposal, not a trained system; the contribution we defend empirically is the corpus analysis and the reporting schema derived from it. Coding sheet, derived statistics and all result artifacts: https://github.com/Kimalice/AI-for-Energy-Optimization-in-Data-Centers-Closing-the-Optimizer-Load-Loop

Energy poverty is nearly absent from NLP-for-social-good, and the little existing work is either static retrieval/QA or relies on carbon-intensive cloud LLMs, a self-defeating "computational irony" for a humanitarian setting. We present EqGrid, a closed-loop simulation in which a low-frequency, open-weight LLM policy agent sets price and carbon bounds and targeted subsidies over a community of empirically-grounded household personas, while high-frequency multi-agent RL traders clear a continuous double auction constrained by a physical distribution grid (IEEE-33-bus with Dynamic Operating Envelopes). Our contribution is threefold and directly addresses how to measure the social impact of AI: (i) grounded personas (region-matched socio-demographics) whose load curves are checked for shape and level realism against real smart-meter data; (ii) formal energy-poverty equity metrics (Energy Burden, Gini of EB, LIHC) showing the intervention reduces burden inequality without raising net grid cost; and (iii) a compute-efficiency frontier that measures how much equity performance survives compressing the policy agent from a 235B teacher down to a sub-1B model deployable on a laptop, in estimated energy/carbon per decision. A decoupled-safety design (the LLM sets bounds; a validate-and-project grid gate executes) yields zero grid-constraint violations versus 55 under direct LLM control. On energy-poverty equity, the LLM policy lowers the Gini of energy burden to 0.305 (from 0.351) and mean burden by 28% while cutting cost (outperforming a tuned rule baseline), and a 3B-active model retains 95% of the benefit at roughly 9x lower inference energy than the teacher, with even a 0.8B on-device model retaining 92% at roughly 24x lower energy. We will release code and configs.

As machine learning and artificial intelligence find their way into nearly every aspect of climate, weather, and Earth system modeling, it is worth pausing to consider what our design decisions imply for the science and for the computational resources we consume. A growing body of literature addresses the ethical and sustainable development of ML/AI, yet translating these principles into day-to-day research practice remains a challenge as most of best practices are dispersed across multiple studies and commentaries. Here, we distill these discussions into a practical checklist that ML/AI and Earth system science practitioners can use to assess and reduce the environmental footprint of their own applications, organised around the successive stages of the model development pipeline. We complement the checklist with a selection of metrics drawn from the literature for estimating the energy consumption and carbon footprint of a project. For each question, we point to concrete examples and actionable suggestions from recent literature, aiming to bridge the gap between aspirational principles and the decisions researchers face at every stage of the development cycle.

Efficient evaluation changes the protocol used to support claims about model behavior, yet it is rarely tested whether those claims remain stable after the evaluation itself is made cheaper. We stress-test conclusion robustness in responsible-AI benchmarking by evaluating three dense and mixture-of-experts models on BBQ and BBQ-V under seven conditions spanning batching, quantization, benchmark reduction, and their combinations. Rather than treating preserved aggregate accuracy as sufficient, we compare accuracy, bias severity and prevalence, reasoning quality, subgroup behavior, subset-membership stability, runtime, and measured GPU energy against a full-benchmark BF16 baseline. Larger batching keeps accuracy within 0.35 percentage points of baseline and produces comparatively small subgroup changes, while reducing energy in five of six model--dataset settings. INT8 largely preserves quality but uses 1.79--4.26$\times$ baseline energy. INT4 causes larger, model- and context-dependent changes. Reduced benchmarks provide the most consistent savings, but very small subsets are substantially more sensitive to which items are retained. Efficient evaluation should therefore be treated as a measurement intervention whose validity must be checked across the conclusions the benchmark is intended to support. Our project website is https://vectorinstitute.github.io/sustainable-rai-evaluation/ and the code is available at https://github.com/VectorInstitute/sustainable-rai-evaluation.

TinyML includes the implementation of machine learning on devices with limited memory and computing resources. With the development of technology, AI systems continue to scale in terms of size and computational requirements. This forces researchers to adapt methods to be environmentally sustainable by designing techniques for reducing computational costs and energy consumption in inferring AI models, even in small devices. In this work, we present preliminary findings on a novel application of the tree depth prune instance hardness method to the TinyML system. The results indicate that threshold control can change energy consumption with limited classification quality changes. This method allows us to adjust classification accuracy, thereby influencing computational complexity and energy consumption for inference. We present a work in progress with initial results as a proof of concept.

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are often regarded as energy-efficient alternatives to artificial neural networks (ANNs), yet their advantage depends critically on both network architecture and data properties. We develop an analytical framework to compare fully-connected ReLU ANNs and integrate-and-fire SNNs for time-series data with respect to their theoretical energy efficiency at matched expressive capacity. By relating an inference-energy model to theoretical bounds on representational expressivity, we derive an expressivity-normalized efficiency ratio and explicit thresholds in network width, spike sparsity, and ANN depth scaling. Our analysis characterizes the regimes in which event-driven computation offsets the temporal overhead of SNNs, providing capacity-aware principles for designing energy-efficient temporal networks. It shows that ANNs exceed SNNs in expressivity-normalized efficiency only in specific regimes.

Thermodynamic computers are stochastic physical devices designed to perform calculations at the thermal energy scale. Their operation is constrained by the equations of stochastic thermodynamics, among which are a set of bounds, known as speed limits, that relate a thermodynamic computer's run time to its computational progress and the heat it dissipates. Using the Wasserstein speed limit we assess the thermodynamic efficiency of a simulation model of a thermodynamic computer trained to perform a standard machine-learning classification task. On this task the thermodynamic computer is as capable as a simple multilayer perceptron. We show that different inference protocols allow the computer to operate within 40% of the thermodynamic limit of efficiency without loss of accuracy, or to perform inference increasingly rapidly at fixed accuracy and thermodynamic efficiency. These results indicate that a thermodynamic computer designed for a particular task retains considerable freedom in its thermodynamic operation.

The rapid growth of LLM inference is shifting sustainability concerns from one-time training to continuous serving, where infrastructure decisions shape energy use, carbon emissions, water consumption, and service quality. Yet operators often need to compare deployment alternatives before large-scale infrastructure is built, making direct measurement costly, slow, and sometimes infeasible. We present InFactPlanner, a trace-driven decision-support framework for what-if analysis of sustainable AI data center deployment for LLM inference across single and geo-distributed sites. InFactPlanner combines query traces, hardware-model profiles, candidate site configurations, PUE/WUE parameters, renewable generation models, and time-varying grid carbon intensity to estimate power, energy, carbon emissions, water use, latency, and server utilization. The framework abstracts low-level serving effects into configurable hardware-model profiles, enabling rapid comparison of site selection, capacity placement, hardware, model, renewable integration, and routing choices. We validate the energy accounting pipeline by reproducing reference LLM inference energy estimates with less than 10% deviation, evaluate scalability across multiple data centers and server counts, and demonstrate scenario-driven decision analyses for hardware selection, renewable placement, geographic deployment, and carbon-aware routing. Our results show that sustainability-optimal choices can differ from latency-optimal ones, and that the carbon value of deployment depends strongly on the local grid mix.

The deployment of large language models (LLMs) in mental health contexts raises questions about the relationship between clinical safety and environmental cost. In this paper, we examine this relationship by combining K-Bench clinical safety scores with EcoLogits life-cycle assessment estimates across 47 supported model configurations. We evaluate model performance and environmental impact across four dimensions: energy use, carbon emissions, water consumption, and abiotic depletion. The results indicate a non-linear trade-off at the upper end of the safety distribution: a 2.61 percentage-point increase in clinical safety score corresponded to an approximately 60-fold increase in estimated energy use per million output tokens. Row-level analyses further suggest that additional test-time compute did not consistently improve clinical safety and, in some configurations, was associated with lower clinical safety scores. These findings suggest that relying solely on larger models or additional inference-time computation may be an inefficient strategy for improving safety in therapeutic AI systems. We discuss the implications for sustainable deployment and highlight dynamic model selection, including model cascading, as a potential approach for reducing environmental impact while preserving clinical performance in higher-risk cases.

This paper presents a comparative study of two distinct approaches, XGBoost and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), for forecasting transmitted heat energy in District Heating Systems (DHS). The objective is to explore scenarios in which conventional ML algorithms demonstrate better performance over deep learning networks in time series forecasting and the associated benefits in terms of computational cost and environmental impact. The study focuses on a real-world DHS dataset. Through experimentation and analysis, it is demonstrated that XGBoost consistently outperforms LSTM in this specific forecasting task. The difference is explained by the error distribution illustrating that LSTM makes more significant errors in the intervals of less data availability. The reduced computational demands of conventional ML approaches not only result in cost savings but also minimize the carbon footprint associated with data analysis tasks in energy systems.

In an era defined by escalating climate change and the pervasive deployment of edge intelligence, the environmental cost of semiconductor manufacturing and operation has reached a critical threshold. As Deep Learning (DL) accelerators dominate System-on-Chip (SoC) die area, achieving true sustainability requires a paradigm shift from static worst-case efficiency to dynamic energy-proportionality. This paper introduces Eco-SoC, a highly scalable VLSI architecture co-designed specifically for sustainable artificial intelligence. We propose a hardware-level Dynamic Precision-Scaling Logic (DPSL) framework that adaptively modulates bit-width precision based on real-time activation sparsity, successfully reducing switching activity by up to 42% on a commercial 7nm FinFET process node. Furthermore, we transcend traditional Power-Performance-Area (PPA) metrics by providing a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using the Architectural Carbon footprint Tool (ACT). Our synthesis demonstrates that Eco-SoC offsets its increased embodied carbon footprint (a marginal 4.8% area overhead) within 1.1 years of edge deployment. Finally, by introducing a thermal-aware power gating mechanism that mitigates localized hotspots, Eco-SoC doubles the projected Mean Time To Failure (MTTF) of the silicon, providing a tangible, scalable strategy for electronic waste (e-waste) mitigation in next-generation computing systems.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have become powerful tools for supporting and automating complex human tasks. Despite their benefits, growing attention has been directed toward their environmental implications, primarily due to their high energy demands and associated carbon emissions. This concern is particularly relevant in light of the increasing deployment of large-scale models, especially Deep Learning (DL) architectures, which provide advanced predictive capabilities but require substantial computational resources. This paper presents a systematic review of research on Green AI, Green DL, and optimization techniques aimed at reducing the environmental impact of AI models. In addition, we examine and compare several carbon measurement tools for estimating emissions generated by AI algorithms. To complement the review, we conducted an empirical evaluation using a CPU-based experimental setup, in which six DL models were implemented for a multi-label classification task. The objective was to quantify and compare their overall carbon emissions and to determine which stages of the DL lifecycle contribute most significantly to the total footprint. The results show that the training phase is the primary source of emissions. Moreover, the findings reveal that increased architectural complexity does not systematically translate into proportional accuracy gains, highlighting the importance of carefully balancing predictive performance and environmental cost. These results reinforce the need to integrate sustainability considerations into model selection and AI system design.

Recent advances in machine learning have greatly improved breast cancer detection, enabling more accurate and timely diagnosis. Deep learning (DL) models show strong potential for medical image analysis; however, as their architectural complexity increases, their environmental impacts are becoming a growing concern. In this paper, we present a comparative analysis of seven DL models for breast cancer detection on two medical datasets: Breast Ultrasound and BreakHis 400X. The evaluated architectures range from Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers to hybrid models. In addition to performance metrics, we assess CO2 emissions during both training and inference. Our results show that EfficientNet and ResNet consistently deliver strong performance, although with higher CO2 emissions. The selected transformers, such as DeiT-Tiny, perform competitively on both datasets, whereas DenseNet121 achieves lower accuracy. On the Breast Ultrasound Dataset, DeiT provides the most favourable balance between accuracy and energy consumption, whereas on the BreakHis dataset, the ViT and Swin models achieve the best results. Overall, our findings indicate that no single architecture category from the evaluated ones consistently dominates across the two selected datasets. Our results highlight the importance of jointly considering performance, emissions, and dataset characteristics when selecting models for medical applications.

Despite rapid advances in large language models (LLMs), deploying and personalizing them on resource-constrained devices remains impractical due to high VRAM, time, and energy costs. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) of Small Language Models (SLMs) offers a promising alternative, yet few studies compare PEFT methods across architectures using both general and personalization benchmarks while accounting for energy consumption. We compare five fine-tuning approaches (Full Fine-Tuning, LoRA, LoRA+, QLoRA, and BitFit) on four SLMs from two families (Transformer-based: TinyLlama-1.1B, Qwen3-1.7B; SSM-based: Mamba-1.4B, Mamba-2-1.3B) across three GLUE tasks (SST-2, QNLI, STS-B) and three LaMP personalization tasks (LaMP-1, LaMP-2, LaMP-3). Each configuration is evaluated with the energy-focused NetScore-E and the memory-focused NetScore-M, the two variants that reflect the constraints binding on-device deployment. Methods are selected with a strict energy-first rule (highest NetScore-E, ties broken by NetScore#). LoRA+ achieves the highest NetScore-E in 19 of 24 configurations and the highest NetScore-M in 13 of 24, and is the selected method in 18 of 24. QLoRA, available only for the Transformer models, cuts peak finetuning VRAM by up to 3.9x relative to LoRA and therefore takes the best NetScore-M in 5 of the 12 Transformer configurations, although its de-quantization overhead leaves it selected in only one of them once energy decides. BitFit and full fine-tuning are almost never competitive on either variant, and TinyLlama-1.1B leads the energy-focused NetScore-E on five of the six benchmarks and the memory-focused NetScore-M on four. These results show that compact SLMs paired with PEFT provide a practical, energy-aware path to personalized on-device deployment, with the optimal method set by the dominant constraint: LoRA+ for energy and QLoRA for memory.