LLM Information Extraction

Accurate extraction of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) phenotypes from electronic health records (EHR) is critical for early-stage detection and disease staging. However, this information is usually embedded in unstructured textual data rather than tabular data, making it difficult to be extracted accurately. We therefore propose LLM-MINE, a Large Language Model-based phenotype mining framework for automatic extraction of ADRD phenotypes from clinical notes. Using two expert-defined phenotype lists, we evaluate the extracted phenotypes by examining their statistical significance across cohorts and their utility for unsupervised disease staging. Chi-square analyses confirm statistically significant phenotype differences across cohorts, with memory impairment being the strongest discriminator. Few-shot prompting with the combined phenotype lists achieves the best clustering performance (ARI=0.290, NMI=0.232), substantially outperforming biomedical NER and dictionary-based baselines. Our results demonstrate that LLM-based phenotype extraction is a promising tool for discovering clinically meaningful ADRD signals from unstructured notes.

Bibliographic reference extraction and parsing are foundational for citation indexing, linking, and downstream scholarly knowledge-graph construction. However, most established evaluations focus on clean, English, end-of-document bibliographies, and therefore underrepresent the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), where citations are frequently multilingual, embedded in footnotes, abbreviated, and shaped by heterogeneous historical conventions. We present a unified benchmark that targets these SSH-realistic conditions across three complementary datasets: CEX (English journal articles spanning multiple disciplines), EXCITE (German/English documents with end-section, footnote-only, and mixed regimes), and LinkedBooks (humanities references with strong stylistic variation and multilinguality). We evaluate three tasks of increasing difficulty -- reference extraction, reference parsing, and end-to-end document parsing -- under a schema-constrained setup that enables direct comparison between a strong supervised pipeline baseline (GROBID) and contemporary LLMs (DeepSeek-V3.1, Mistral-Small-3.2-24B, Gemma-3-27B-it, and Qwen3-VL (4B-32B variants)). Across datasets, extraction largely saturates beyond a moderate capability threshold, while parsing and end-to-end parsing remain the primary bottlenecks due to structured-output brittleness under noisy layouts. We further show that lightweight LoRA adaptation yields consistent gains -- especially on SSH-heavy benchmarks -- and that segmentation/pipelining can substantially improve robustness. Finally, we argue for hybrid deployment via routing: leveraging GROBID for well-structured, in-distribution PDFs while escalating multilingual and footnote-heavy documents to task-adapted LLMs.

The rapid growth of scientific literature has made manual extraction of structured knowledge increasingly impractical. To address this challenge, we introduce SCILIRE, a system for creating datasets from scientific literature. SCILIRE has been designed around Human-AI teaming principles centred on workflows for verifying and curating data. It facilitates an iterative workflow in which researchers can review and correct AI outputs. Furthermore, this interaction is used as a feedback signal to improve future LLM-based inference. We evaluate our design using a combination of intrinsic benchmarking outcomes together with real-world case studies across multiple domains. The results demonstrate that SCILIRE improves extraction fidelity and facilitates efficient dataset creation.

Multi-document Multi-entity Question Answering inherently demands models to track implicit logic between multiple entities across scattered documents. However, existing Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) frameworks suffer from critical limitations: standard RAG's vector similarity-based coarse-grained retrieval often omits critical facts, graph-based RAG fails to efficiently integrate fragmented complex relationship networks, and both lack schema awareness, leading to inadequate cross-document evidence chain construction and inaccurate entity relationship deduction. To address these challenges, we propose DocSage, an end-to-end agentic framework that integrates dynamic schema discovery, structured information extraction, and schema-aware relational reasoning with error guarantees. DocSage operates through three core modules: (1) A schema discovery module dynamically infers query-specific minimal joinable schemas to capture essential entities and relationships; (2) An extraction module transforms unstructured text into semantically coherent relational tables, enhanced by error-aware correction mechanisms to reduce extraction errors; (3) A reasoning module performs multi-hop relational reasoning over structured tables, leveraging schema awareness to efficiently align cross-document entities and aggregate evidence. This agentic design offers three key advantages: precise fact localization via SQL-powered indexing, natural support for cross-document entity joins through relational tables, and mitigated LLM attention diffusion via structured representation. Evaluations on two MDMEQA benchmarks demonstrate that DocSage significantly outperforms state-of-the-art long-context LLMs and RAG systems, achieving more than 27% accuracy improvements respectively.

The performance of large language models (LLMs) for supporting pathology report writing in Japanese remains unexplored. We evaluated seven open-source LLMs from three perspectives: (A) generation and information extraction of pathology diagnosis text following predefined formats, (B) correction of typographical errors in Japanese pathology reports, and (C) subjective evaluation of model-generated explanatory text by pathologists and clinicians. Thinking models and medical-specialized models showed advantages in structured reporting tasks that required reasoning and in typo correction. In contrast, preferences for explanatory outputs varied substantially across raters. Although the utility of LLMs differed by task, our findings suggest that open-source LLMs can be useful for assisting Japanese pathology report writing in limited but clinically relevant scenarios.

Radiology reports capture crucial longitudinal information on tumor burden, treatment response, and disease progression, yet their unstructured narrative format complicates automated analysis. While large language models (LLMs) have advanced clinical text processing, most state-of-the-art systems remain proprietary, limiting their applicability in privacy-sensitive healthcare environments. We present a fully open-source, locally deployable pipeline for longitudinal information extraction from radiology reports, implemented using the llm_extractinator framework. The system applies the qwen2.5-72b model to extract and link target, non-target, and new lesion data across time points in accordance with RECIST criteria. Evaluation on 50 Dutch CT Thorax/Abdomen report pairs yielded high extraction performance, with attribute-level accuracies of 93.7% for target lesions, 94.9% for non-target lesions, and 94.0% for new lesions. The approach demonstrates that open-source LLMs can achieve clinically meaningful performance in multi-timepoint oncology tasks while ensuring data privacy and reproducibility. These results highlight the potential of locally deployable LLMs for scalable extraction of structured longitudinal data from routine clinical text.

The first 72 hours of a missing-person investigation are critical for successful recovery. Guardian is an end-to-end system designed to support missing-child investigation and early search planning. This paper presents the Guardian LLM Pipeline, a multi-model system in which LLMs are used for intelligent information extraction and processing related to missing-person search operations. The pipeline coordinates end-to-end execution across task-specialized LLM models and invokes a consensus LLM engine that compares multiple model outputs and resolves disagreements. The pipeline is further strengthened by QLoRA-based fine-tuning, using curated datasets. The presented design aligns with prior work on weak supervision and LLM-assisted annotation, emphasizing conservative, auditable use of LLMs as structured extractors and labelers rather than unconstrained end-to-end decision makers.

Extracting structured information from academic PDF documents is non trivial: a single page typically combines free text metadata with tabular regions, exhibits cross program variation, and is susceptible to Unicode encoding artifacts that interfere with downstream parsing. This study evaluates the reliability of information extraction approaches for tabular PDF documents, using academic course registration documents (Kartu Rencana Studi or KRS) from Indonesian higher education as a case study. Three strategies are compared: LLM only, Hybrid Deterministic - LLM (regex & LLM), and a Camelot based pipeline with LLM fallback. Experiments were conducted on 140 documents for the LLM based test and 860 documents for the Camelot based pipeline evaluation, covering four study programs with varying data in tables and metadata. Three 12 - 14B LLM models (Gemma 3, Phi 4, and Qwen 2.5) were run locally using Ollama and a consumer grade CPU without a GPU. Evaluations used exact match (EM) and Levenshtein similarity (LS) metrics with a threshold of 0.7. Although not applicable to all models, the results show that the hybrid approach can improve efficiency compared to LLM only, especially for deterministic metadata. The Camelot based pipeline with LLM fallback produced the best combination of accuracy (EM and LS up to 0.99 - 1.00) and computational efficiency (less than 1 second per PDF in most cases). The Qwen 2.5:14b model demonstrated the most consistent performance across all scenarios. These findings confirm that integrating deterministic and LLM based methods is a reliable and efficient strategy for information extraction from tabular text based PDF documents in computationally constrained environments.

Political polarization emerges from a complex interplay of beliefs about policies, figures, and issues. However, most computational analyses reduce discourse to coarse partisan labels, overlooking how these beliefs interact. This is especially evident in online political conversations, which are often nuanced and cover a wide range of subjects, making it difficult to automatically identify the target of discussion and the opinion expressed toward them. In this study, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) can address this challenge through Target-Stance Extraction (TSE), a recent natural language processing task that combines target identification and stance detection, enabling more granular analysis of political opinions. For this, we construct a dataset of 1,084 Reddit posts from r/NeutralPolitics, covering 138 distinct political targets and evaluate a range of proprietary and open-source LLMs using zero-shot, few-shot, and context-augmented prompting strategies. Our results show that the best models perform comparably to highly trained human annotators and remain robust on challenging posts with low inter-annotator agreement. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can extract complex political opinions with minimal supervision, offering a scalable tool for computational social science and political text analysis.

The extraction of structured information from raw text is a fundamental component of many NLP applications, including document retrieval, ranking, and relevance estimation. High-quality extractions often require domain-specific accuracy, up-to-date understanding of specialized taxonomies, and the ability to incorporate emerging jargon and rare outliers. In many domains--such as medical, legal, and HR--the extraction model must also adapt to shifting terminology and benefit from explicit reasoning over structured knowledge. We propose DySECT, a Dynamic Self-Evolving Extraction and Curation Toolkit, which continually improves as it is used. The system incrementally populates a versatile, self-expanding knowledge base (KB) with triples extracted by the LLM. The KB further enriches itself through the integration of probabilistic knowledge and graph-based reasoning, gradually accumulating domain concepts and relationships. The enriched KB then feeds back into the LLM extractor via prompt tuning, sampling of relevant few-shot examples, or fine-tuning using KB-derived synthetic data. As a result, the system forms a symbiotic closed-loop cycle in which extraction continuously improves knowledge, and knowledge continuously improves extraction.

This study presents OpenExtract, an open-source pipeline for automated data extraction in large-scale systematic literature reviews. The pipeline queries large language models (LLMs) to predict data entries based on relevant sections of scientific articles. To test the efficacy of OpenExtract, we apply it to a systematic literature review in digital health and compare its outputs with those of human researchers. OpenExtract achieves precision and recall scores of > 0.8 in this task, indicating that it can be effective at extracting data automatically and efficiently. OpenExtract: https://github.com/JimAchterbergLUMC/OpenExtract.

Think about how human handles complex reading tasks: marking key points, inferring their relationships, and structuring information to guide understanding and responses. Likewise, can a large language model benefit from text structure to enhance text-processing performance? To explore it, in this work, we first introduce Structure of Thought (SoT), a prompting technique that explicitly guides models to construct intermediate text structures, consistently boosting performance across eight tasks and three model families. Building upon this insight, we present T2S-Bench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate and improve text-to-structure capabilities of models. T2S-Bench includes 1.8K samples across 6 scientific domains and 32 structural types, rigorously constructed to ensure accuracy, fairness, and quality. Evaluation on 45 mainstream models reveals substantial improvement potential: the average accuracy on the multi-hop reasoning task is only 52.1%, and even the most advanced model achieves 58.1% node accuracy in end-to-end extraction. Furthermore, on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, SoT alone yields an average +5.7% improvement across eight diverse text-processing tasks, and fine-tuning on T2S-Bench further increases this gain to +8.6%. These results highlight the value of explicit text structuring and the complementary contributions of SoT and T2S-Bench. Dataset and eval code have been released at https://t2s-bench.github.io/T2S-Bench-Page/.

Understanding and predicting judicial outcomes demands nuanced analysis of legal documents. Traditional approaches treat judgments and proceedings as unstructured text, limiting the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) in tasks such as summarization, argument generation, and judgment prediction. We propose LexChronos, an agentic framework that iteratively extracts structured event timelines from Supreme Court of India judgments. LexChronos employs a dual-agent architecture: a LoRA-instruct-tuned extraction agent identifies candidate events, while a pre-trained feedback agent scores and refines them through a confidence-driven loop. To address the scarcity of Indian legal event datasets, we construct a synthetic corpus of 2000 samples using reverse-engineering techniques with DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4, generating gold-standard event annotations. Our pipeline achieves a BERT-based F1 score of 0.8751 against this synthetic ground truth. In downstream evaluations on legal text summarization, GPT-4 preferred structured timelines over unstructured baselines in 75% of cases, demonstrating improved comprehension and reasoning in Indian jurisprudence. This work lays a foundation for future legal AI applications in the Indian context, such as precedent mapping, argument synthesis, and predictive judgment modelling, by harnessing structured representations of legal events.

While many researchers use Large Language Models (LLMs) through chat-based access, their real potential lies in leveraging LLMs via application programming interfaces (APIs). This paper conceptualizes LLMs as universal text processing machines and presents a comprehensive workflow for employing LLMs in three qualitative and quantitative content analysis tasks: (1) annotation (an umbrella term for qualitative coding, labeling and text classification), (2) summarization, and (3) information extraction. The workflow is explicitly human-centered. Researchers design, supervise, and validate each stage of the LLM process to ensure rigor and transparency. Our approach synthesizes insights from extensive methodological literature across multiple disciplines: political science, sociology, computer science, psychology, and management. We outline validation procedures and best practices to address key limitations of LLMs, such as their black-box nature, prompt sensitivity, and tendency to hallucinate. To facilitate practical implementation, we provide supplementary materials, including a prompt library and Python code in Jupyter Notebook format, accompanied by detailed usage instructions.

Structured Outputs from current LLMs exhibit sporadic errors, hindering enterprise AI deployment. We present CONSTRUCT, a real-time uncertainty estimator that scores the trustworthiness of LLM Structured Outputs. Lower-scoring outputs are more likely to contain errors, enabling automatic prioritization of limited human review bandwidth. CONSTRUCT additionally scores the trustworthiness of each field within a Structured Output, helping reviewers quickly identify which parts of the output are incorrect. Our method is suitable for any LLM (including black-box LLM APIs without logprobs), does not require labeled training data or custom model deployment, and supports complex Structured Outputs with heterogeneous fields and nested JSON schemas. We also introduce one of the first public LLM Structured Output benchmarks with reliable ground-truth values. Over this four-dataset benchmark, CONSTRUCT detects errors in outputs from various LLMs (including Gemini 3 and GPT-5) with significantly higher precision/recall than existing techniques.

The production of large-scale political datasets typically demands extracting structured facts from vast piles of unstructured documents or web sources, a task that traditionally relies on expensive human experts and remains prohibitively difficult to automate at scale. In this paper, we leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the extraction of multi-dimensional elite biographies, addressing a long-standing bottleneck in political science research. We propose a two-stage ``Synthesis-Coding'' framework for complex extraction task: an upstream synthesis stage that uses recursive agentic LLMs to search, filter, and curate biography from heterogeneous web sources, followed by a downstream coding stage that maps curated biography into structured dataframes. We validate this framework through three primary results. First, we demonstrate that, when given curated contexts, LLM coders match or outperform human experts in extraction accuracy. Second, we show that in web environments, the agentic system synthesizes more information from web resources than human collective intelligence (Wikipedia). Finally, we diagnosed that directly coding from long and multi-language corpora introduces bias that the synthesis stage can alleviate by curating evidence into signal-dense representations. By comprehensive evaluation, We provide a generalizable, scalable framework for building transparent and expansible large scale database in political science.

Multi-turn LLM evaluation is typically reported as a single win-rate scalar, conflating distinct capabilities. We introduce AIDG (Adversarial Information Deduction Game), formalizing multi-turn adversarial dialogue as a two-player partially observable stochastic game (POSG) and decomposing performance along Seeker (extraction) and Holder (containment) roles. The decomposition isolates three failure modes: cooperative-prior leakage, constraint-reasoning interference, and inefficient hypothesis-space traversal. Across 439 games over six frontier LLMs, defensive performance is tightly clustered (sigma = 1.9 ELO) while offensive performance varies substantially (sigma = 53.3 ELO); confirmation framing increases extraction odds 7.75x over uninformed deduction (p < 0.00001); and constraint violations account for 41.3% of deductive failures, uncorrelated with scale (rho = 0.0). We position the containment-over-extraction gap not as a surprising finding but as a measurable consequence of locally resolvable defensive decisions versus globally coupled offensive planning, and use the decomposition to attribute the gap per model. All design choices, including turn-decay weighting and the Bradley-Terry rating model, are derived from explicit assumptions.

Accurately measuring consumer emotions and evaluations from unstructured text remains a core challenge for marketing research and practice. This study introduces the Linguistic eXtractor (LX), a fine-tuned, large language model trained on consumer-authored text that also has been labeled with consumers' self-reported ratings of 16 consumption-related emotions and four evaluation constructs: trust, commitment, recommendation, and sentiment. LX consistently outperforms leading models, including GPT-4 Turbo, RoBERTa, and DeepSeek, achieving 81% macro-F1 accuracy on open-ended survey responses and greater than 95% accuracy on third-party-annotated Amazon and Yelp reviews. An application of LX to online retail data, using seemingly unrelated regression, affirms that review-expressed emotions predict product ratings, which in turn predict purchase behavior. Most emotional effects are mediated by product ratings, though some emotions, such as discontent and peacefulness, influence purchase directly, indicating that emotional tone provides meaningful signals beyond star ratings. To support its use, a no-code, cost-free, LX web application is available, enabling scalable analyses of consumer-authored text. In establishing a new methodological foundation for consumer perception measurement, this research demonstrates new methods for leveraging large language models to advance marketing research and practice, thereby achieving validated detection of marketing constructs from consumer data.

Producing output that conforms to a specified JSON schema underlies tool use, structured extraction, and knowledge base construction in modern large language models. Despite this centrality, public datasets for the task remain small, synthetic, or text-only, and rarely pair real page content with the prompts and schemas used in practice. We introduce ScrapeGraphAI-100k, 93,695 schema-constrained extraction events collected via opt-in ScrapeGraphAI telemetry in Q2--Q3 2025, deduplicated and balanced by schema from 9M raw events. The corpus spans 18 000+ unique schemas across 15 named languages plus a long-tail Other category, with English and Traditional Chinese covering 88% of detected content, each instance pairs Markdown-converted page content with a prompt, schema, LLM response, and per-example jsonschema-rs structural conformance labels (semantic correctness is out of scope, and raw HTML is deferred beyond v1.0). We characterize structural diversity across the corpus and identify sharp failure thresholds as schema complexity grows. As a case study, a 1.7B student fine-tuned on this data closely tracks the output distribution of its GPT-5-nano teacher, though it still trails a 30B-A3B reference (3.3B active parameters) on schema compliance. We offer this distillation result as preliminary evidence that grounding schema-constrained generation in real practitioner workloads at scale enables training and benchmarking that prior synthetic or text-only corpora could not support.

We present LLMStructBench, a novel benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on extracting structured data and generating valid JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) outputs from natural-language text. Our open dataset comprises diverse, manually verified parsing scenarios of varying complexity and enables systematic testing across 22 models and five prompting strategies. We further introduce complementary performance metrics that capture both token-level accuracy and document-level validity, facilitating rigorous comparison of model, size, and prompting effects on parsing reliability. In particular, we show that choosing the right prompting strategy is more important than standard attributes such as model size. This especially ensures structural validity for smaller or less reliable models but increase the number of semantic errors. Our benchmark suite is an step towards future research in the area of LLM applied to parsing or Extract, Transform and Load (ETL) applications.

Document-level Information Extraction (DocIE) aims to produce an output template with the entities, relations, and events of interest occurring in the given document. Standard practices include prompting decoder-only LLMs using greedy decoding to avoid output variability. Rather than treating this variability as a limitation, we show that sampling can produce substantially better solutions than greedy decoding, especially when using reasoning models. We thus propose ThinkTwice, a sampling and selection framework in which the LLM generates multiple candidate templates for a given document, and a selection module chooses the most suitable one. We introduce both an unsupervised method that exploits agreement across generated outputs, and a supervised selection method using reward models trained on labeled DocIE data. To address the scarcity of golden reasoning trajectories for DocIE, we propose a rejection-sampling-based method to generate silver training data that pairs output templates with reasoning traces. Our experiments show the validity of unsupervised and supervised ThinkTwice, consistently outperforming greedy baselines and the supervised state-of-the-art.

Named entity recognition (NER) is evolving from a sequence labeling task into a generative paradigm with the rise of large language models (LLMs). We conduct a systematic evaluation of open-source LLMs on both flat and nested NER tasks. We investigate several research questions including the performance gap between generative NER and traditional NER models, the impact of output formats, whether LLMs rely on memorization, and the preservation of general capabilities after fine-tuning. Through experiments across eight LLMs of varying scales and four standard NER datasets, we find that: (1) With parameter-efficient fine-tuning and structured formats like inline bracketed or XML, open-source LLMs achieve performance competitive with traditional encoder-based models and surpass decoder-based LLMs with in-context learning techniques; (2) The NER capability of LLMs stems from instruction-following and generative power, not mere memorization of entity-label pairs; and (3) Applying NER instruction tuning has minimal impact on general capabilities of LLMs, even improving performance on datasets like DROP by 25.50 to 45.32 F1 points due to enhanced entity understanding. These findings demonstrate that generative NER with LLMs is a promising, user-friendly alternative to traditional methods. We release the data and code at https://github.com/szu-tera/LLMs4NER.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for text analysis tasks, such as named entity recognition or error detection. Unlike encoder-based models, however, generative architectures lack an explicit mechanism to refer to specific parts of their input. This leads to a variety of ad-hoc prompting strategies for span labeling, often with inconsistent results. In this paper, we categorize these strategies into three families: tagging the input text, indexing numerical positions of spans, and matching span content. To address the limitations of content matching, we introduce LogitMatch, a new constrained decoding method that forces the model's output to align with valid input spans. We evaluate all methods across four diverse tasks. We find that while tagging remains a robust baseline, LogitMatch improves upon competitive matching-based methods by eliminating span matching issues and outperforms other strategies in some setups.

Large language models represent text as hidden numerical patterns, but what information these representations actually contain remains a mystery. Can we recover the original text from just one of them? In this paper, we introduce Rep2Text, a method designed to answer this question by reconstructing text from a single hidden representation. We find that these representations preserve much more information than we might expect. For short texts of about 16 words, Rep2Text can recover roughly half of the original words while preserving their overall meaning. As the text gets longer, recovering the exact wording becomes harder, but the main ideas can still be recovered. These findings offer a new way to understand what language models store internally and highlight potential privacy risks, as hidden representations may reveal parts of the original input.

Wide access to advanced experimental methods in materials science has given rise to an abundance of procedural knowledge, which is scattered across decades of scientific literature and recorded in unstructured formats that are challenging to analyze systematically. In this work, we present LeMat-Synth Parser, a modular, open-source, and multi-modal extraction toolbox that utilizes large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) to automatically structure synthesis protocols and performance metrics extracted from both text and figures of publications. Applying LeMat-Synth Parser to 81K open-access publications, we curate LeMat-Synth, an extensive dataset of 58K synthesis procedures and to our knowledge the largest and most diverse structured inorganic materials synthesis dataset to date, covering 35 synthesis methods and 16 material classes based on a domain-specific ontology. We validate extraction quality against annotations by domain experts and a scalable LLM-as-a-judge framework, and benchmark a suite of models to identify optimal configurations and characterize cross-model biases. To demonstrate the extensibility of LeMat-Synth Parser, we apply it to two distinct domains. First, we link synthesis protocols and catalyst identity to thermocatalytic performance across a corpus of ammonia-decomposition publications. Second, we cross-validate text- and figure-reported critical transition temperatures across 1,384 superconductivity papers, then use the validated pipeline to recover the critical transition temperature for every composition in a sample series. We release LeMat-Synth Parser and the LeMat-Synth dataset openly on GitHub and Hugging Face

LLMs are remarkable artifacts that have revolutionized a range of knowledge-intensive tasks. A significant contributor is their factual knowledge, which, to date, remains poorly understood, and is usually analyzed from biased samples. In this paper, we provide a framework and the results of a multi-dimensional analysis of GPTKB v1.5 (Hu et al., 2025a), a recursively elicited Knowledge Base (KB) of 100 million facts (or beliefs) of a frontier LLM, namely, GPT-4.1. Given the scale of the elicited facts, we provide a multi-dimensional approach to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze these facts as opposed to the mainstream fact completion benchmarks, which are prone to availability bias. We find that the models' factual knowledge differs quite significantly from established knowledge bases, and that its accuracy is significantly lower than indicated by previous benchmarks. We also find that inconsistency, ambiguity and hallucinations are major issues, shedding light on future research opportunities in neuro-symbolic AI concerning extraction, consolidation and verification of factual LLM knowledge.

Language models are powerful artifacts, yet their factual knowledge is still poorly understood, and inaccessible to ad-hoc browsing and scalable statistical analysis. This demonstration introduces GPTKB v1.5, a densely interlinked 100-million-triple knowledge base (KB) built for $14,000 from GPT-4.1, using the GPTKB methodology for massive-recursive LLM knowledge materialization. This demo focuses on three use cases: (1) link-traversal-based LLM knowledge exploration, (2) SPARQL-based structured LLM knowledge querying, (3) comparative exploration of the strengths and weaknesses of LLM knowledge. Massive-recursive LLM knowledge materialization is a groundbreaking opportunity both for the systematic analysis of LLM knowledge, as well as for automated KB construction.

A key factor for lunar mission planning is the ability to assess the local availability of raw materials. However, many potentially relevant measurements are scattered across a variety of scientific publications. In this paper we consider the viability of obtaining lunar composition data by leveraging LLMs to rapidly process a corpus of scientific publications. While leveraging LLMs to obtain knowledge from scientific documents is not new, this particular application presents interesting challenges due to the heterogeneity of lunar samples and the nuances involved in their characterization. Accuracy and uncertainty quantification are particularly crucial since many materials properties can be sensitive to small variations in composition. Our findings indicate that off-the-shelf LLMs are generally effective at extracting data from tables commonly found in these documents. However, there remains opportunity to further refine the data we extract in this initial approach; in particular, to capture fine-grained mineralogy information and to improve performance on more subtle/complex pieces of information.