Multimodal Reasoning
Overview
Multimodal reasoning studies how models perceive information across modalities, connect that evidence to knowledge, and use it to answer questions, plan actions, or explain decisions. Common approaches include instruction tuning and chain-of-thought training, reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards, tool-using agents, and structured methods such as graphs or symbolic solvers. Benchmarks such as MathVista and MMMU test visual problem solving, while video, document, scientific, and medical tasks probe reasoning across time and specialized evidence. A central challenge is ensuring that correct answers actually depend on relevant multimodal evidence rather than language shortcuts; grounding, cross-modal integration, and reliable generalization remain difficult.
Latest papers
512 papers47 papers in the last four weeks, down 10% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
Chain of Modality: From Static Fusion to Dynamic Orchestration in Omni-MLLMs
Seek-and-Solve: Benchmarking MLLMs for Visual Clue-Driven Reasoning in Daily Scenarios
MERRIN: A Benchmark for Multimodal Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning in Noisy Web Environments
Medical thinking with multiple images
Towards Long-horizon Agentic Multimodal Search
MISID: A Multimodal Multi-turn Dataset for Complex Intent Recognition in Strategic Deception Games
MODIX: A Training-Free Multimodal Information-Driven Positional Index Scaling for Vision-Language Models
Modality-Native Routing in Agent-to-Agent Networks: A Multimodal A2A Protocol Extension
Collaborative Multi-Agent Scripts Generation for Enhancing Imperfect-Information Reasoning in Murder Mystery Games
CFMS: A Coarse-to-Fine Multimodal Synthesis Framework for Enhanced Tabular Reasoning
When Meaning Isn't Literal: Exploring Idiomatic Meaning Across Languages and Modalities
grapes are sour''): it encodes denial-driven rationalization, yet naive models latch onto the literal fox-and-grape imagery. Addressing this oversight, we present Mediom,'' a multilingual, multimodal idiom corpus of 3,533 Hindi, Bengali, and Thai idioms, each paired with gold-standard explanations, cross-lingual translations, and carefully aligned text--image representations. We benchmark both large language models (textual reasoning) and vision-language models (figurative disambiguation) on Mediom, exposing systematic failures in metaphor comprehension. To mitigate these gaps, we propose ``HIDE,'' a Hinting-based Idiom Explanation framework that leverages error-feedback retrieval and targeted diagnostic cues for iterative reasoning refinement. Collectively, Mediom and HIDE establish a rigorous test bed and methodology for culturally grounded, multimodal idiom understanding embedded with reasoning hints in next-generation AI systems.