Multimodal Understanding
Overview
The field studies how AI can combine evidence from different kinds of input to answer questions, recognize events, retrieve information, and reason about scenes over time. Common approaches include vision-language models and multimodal large language models, trained with contrastive alignment, cross-attention, instruction tuning, and reinforcement learning; some systems add modality-specific experts, retrieval, or tools. Benchmarks test image and video question answering, document and chart understanding, audio-visual reasoning, grounding, and performance across languages and domains. A central challenge is ensuring that answers genuinely depend on relevant evidence from each modality, while handling long inputs efficiently and making capabilities measurable with reliable tests.
Latest papers
479 papers15 papers in the last four weeks, up 25% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.
TimeBlind: A Spatio-Temporal Compositionality Benchmark for Video LLMs
SONIC-O1: A Real-World Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models on Audio-Video Understanding
MAD: Modality-Adaptive Decoding for Mitigating Cross-Modal Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models
Uni-RS: A Spatially Faithful Unified Understanding and Generation Model for Remote Sensing
AVMeme Exam: A Multimodal Multilingual Multicultural Benchmark for LLMs' Contextual and Cultural Knowledge and Thinking
Social Caption: Evaluating Social Understanding in Multimodal Models
CASHEW: Stabilizing Multimodal Reasoning via Iterative Trajectory Aggregation
NarrativeTrack: Evaluating Entity-Centric Reasoning for Narrative Understanding
VLM2GeoVec: Toward Universal Multimodal Embeddings for Remote Sensing
VKnowU: Evaluating Visual Knowledge Understanding in Multimodal LLMs
SpatialThinker: Reinforcing Scene Graph-Grounded Spatial Reasoning via Dense Rewards
M4FC: a Multimodal, Multilingual, Multicultural, Multitask Real-World Fact-Checking Dataset
From Charts to Code: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Multimodal Models
Evidence Recomposition and Predictive Context Residualization for Visual Attribution in Multimodal Large Language Models
Lavida-O: Elastic Large Masked Diffusion Models for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation
Do Modern Video-LLMs Need to Listen? A Benchmark Audit and Scalable Remedy
Reconstruction Alignment Improves Unified Multimodal Models
VMMU: A Vietnamese Multitask Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark
Inverse-LLaVA: Rethinking Multimodal Alignment via Text-to-Vision Mapping
Position: Reasoning After Perception Means Reasoning Without Vision
Perception-then-Reasoning'' paradigm degenerates perception into a passive, one-off feature encoding process, rendering it functionally equivalent to Reasoning-in-Text-Space'', where task-critical spatial signals are collapsed before reasoning begins. We substantiate this claim with the Turing Eye Test (TET): tasks that must be resolved in visual space and are hard to verbalize; results show text-only reasoning cannot remedy these perceptual failures. Our findings suggest rethinking the architectural divide: shifting from reasoning about perception to reasoning within perception. This facilitates actively reasoning-driven perception that operates directly on pixel-level visual representations, rather than within a collapsed textual space.