Reasoning for VLA Models

VLA: Vision-Language-Action

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

7 papers in the last four weeks, up 133% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 54

Oct 7, 2026cs.CV

Explicit Geometric Chain-of-Thought for Vision-Language-Action in Autonomous Driving

Vision-language-action~(VLA) models have emerged as a promising paradigm for autonomous driving. However, existing VLA models still suffer from a fundamental mismatch: driving actions require precise 3D geometric cues, while visual-language understanding and reasoning are largely conducted in a 2D semantic space. In this paper, we propose GeoCoTDrive, an explicit geometric chain-of-thought framework that grounds geometry in a planning-oriented manner. GeoCoTDrive follows a think with 2D first, drive with dedicated 3D priors paradigm. It first grounds 2D regions corresponding to decision-critical cues, and then retrieves localized 3D priors by sampling features from a geometric foundation model within the grounded regions. These localized geometric features are interleaved into the autoregressive context to support the trajectory generation. To supervise this process, we introduce planning-relevant grounding, a new region-level grounding task that focuses on local spatial cues directly affecting ego planning decisions, and construct the PlanningGrounding dataset to endow VLAs with planning-oriented grounding capability. Experiments across multiple end-to-end autonomous driving benchmarks show that GeoCoTDrive consistently improves safety-critical planning performance, demonstrating the effectiveness of the explicit geometric chain-of-thought process for VLA-based planning.

Xingtai Gui, Yucheng Zhou, Dongqian Guo +3

SKL-IOTSC, Department of AI, University of Macau · Afari Intelligent Drive

Autonomous Driving Planning Reasoning for VLA Models

Oct 5, 2026cs.RO

Encoded but Not in Control: Revealing the Grounding Gap in Vision-Language Robot Policies

Instruction following is central to language-conditioned robot policies: language should determine what to do when the same scene permits multiple valid actions. Yet successful execution alone cannot establish whether a policy follows the instruction or infers the task from the scene. We study this ambiguity through scene-preserving instruction interventions, using valid target substitutions, arbitrary nouns, and unrelated sentences while holding the scene fixed. We evaluate vision-language-action (VLA) policies and world-action models (WAMs) in simulation and in real-world experiments. Our analysis addresses three questions: (a) Does task success imply instruction following? When instructions request a different visible object, all evaluated policies predominantly approach and pick up the incorrect original target associated with the scene. (b) Is this failure caused by language insensitivity? Instruction perturbations affect task performance. A layerwise action lens shows intermediate action predictions respond to these perturbations. Linear probes accurately recover instructed targets, indicating modified instructions are encoded despite rarely determining target selection. (c) Why does encoded language fail to control action? Attention analysis indicates weak instruction-token contributions to action generation. Target-token attention can remain focused on the original object, revealing a mismatch between target encoding and visual grounding. UMAP and shared non-negative matrix factorization show target information remains accessible within representations increasingly organized by scene identity. Our findings expose a grounding gap concealed by nominal success and provide a diagnostic framework. They further establish a concrete criterion for progress: policies should reliably follow valid changes in user intent, even when they conflict with scene-favored behavior.

Shaohan Jiang, Jiahang Cao, Qiduo He +9

HKU · CUHK(SZ) · Shanghai AI Lab +3

Vision-Language Grounding Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Oct 5, 2026cs.RO

Do VLAs Understand and Adapt to the Objects They Handle, or Simply Replay Learned Behaviors?

This paper asks whether VLA generalization is grounded in a global understanding of objects' physical properties that enables policies to adapt their motion to unseen setups, or if policies simply replay the motions they've learnt that happen to succeed in new setups. The former reflects genuine generalization; the latter reflects incidental robustness. We first examine awareness of physical properties in seven VLAs by applying linear probing and representational similarity analysis (RSA) to their activations. We find that physical properties, including mass, fragility, deformability, friction and size are less decodable than non-physical properties such as semantic category, material, sound and price in nearly every modality stream. Compared with their base VLMs, robot pre-training weakens the linear encoding of physical properties in the language stream. Neither pre-training nor downstream fine-tuning strengthens the alignment between physical-property differences and activation distances. We then ask whether the weak physical information present in these activations shapes the actions a VLA generates. In a controlled LIBERO case study, we increase the mass of an in-domain object and signal the change through language or vision. Most VLAs use similar lifting behaviour for the heavier and original-mass objects, leading to task success declines. The few exceptions change their behaviour in response to lexical or visual cues rather than to mass itself. These results suggest that VLAs encode physical properties weakly and do not reliably use them to adapt their motion.

Xinnuo Xu

Generalization in Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Oct 4, 2026cs.CV

Triggering Generalist Reasoning via Predictive Uncertainty for Dual-System VLA

Dual-system Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models improve real-time robotic control by pairing a slow, reasoning-capable generalist with a fast specialist action expert. However, existing methods invoke the generalist at a fixed frequency, ignoring the fact that decision-making complexity varies throughout a rollout. This static strategy wastes computation in easy phases and can delay renewed reasoning when the scene changes unexpectedly. We propose TUD (Triggering generalist reasoning via predictive Uncertainty for Dual-system VLA), an adaptive inference framework that selectively skips unnecessary generalist calls. TUD measures the cross-step dispersion of action re-predictions at the upcoming chunk slot under the cached generalist context, as a predictive uncertainty signal. This signal captures how much the future action plan shifts as new observations arrive and is computed from forwards the architecture already runs, requiring neither manual phase labels nor an auxiliary uncertainty model. On VLA-Arena, it achieves a higher success rate at matched call budgets than alternative uncertainty baselines while maintaining low wall-clock overhead, and more consistently separates successful from failed rollouts. Also, TUD finds a more favorable cost-success trade-off than non-adaptive baselines, tracing an entire operating curve as a single threshold is varied, and substantially reduces VLM calls at matched success rate. The same trade-off appears in our real-robot experiments, where TUD cuts generalist calls by 75% relative to the strongest fixed-interval baseline while achieving an even higher success rate. Our results suggest that predictive uncertainty provides a practical criterion for adaptive reasoning in efficient VLA control.

Hyemin Yang, Wooseong Jeong, Giwon Lee +1

KAIST

Uncertainty Estimation for VLA Models Efficient VLA Model Inference Test-Time Adaptation of VLA Models VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Oct 1, 2026cs.RO

UniWAM: Unified World-Action Model

Vision-language-action models benefit from the understanding and reasoning capabilities of pretrained vision-language models, but action-only supervision provides limited grounding in world dynamics. Conversely, world-action models inherit spatiotemporal priors from video generation models, yet remain limited in semantic understanding and reasoning under distribution shifts. We introduce UniWAM, a unified architecture that integrates a physical reasoner, a world generator, and an action predictor to jointly learn semantic understanding of the physical world, visual generation, and action prediction. To ensure the quality of the training data, we developed a rigorous data cleaning and annotation pipeline for both human egocentric data and robot data. To adapt the vision-language component to embodied tasks while preserving its inherited language capabilities, we represent low-level actions in natural language and introduce a pre-training recipe that assigns complementary supervision from visual question answering (VQA) data, human egocentric data, and robot demonstrations to the appropriate model components. During post-training, future visual noise augmentation reduces reliance on precise future predictions, while history-conditioned flow matching uses encoded action history to initialize action generation. Together, these designs significantly reduce denoising steps while maintaining performance. UniWAM achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance across multiple evaluations, including in-distribution performance, robustness, generalization, instruction following, and long-horizon task execution. Furthermore, we uncover a log-linear scaling law of unified human-robot co-training, demonstrating the effectiveness of large-scale pre-training on a mixture of human and robot data.

Wenxuan Song, Jiayi Chen, Jingbo Wang +13

Vision-Language-Action Models World Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models Embodied World Models Robot Learning

Sep 29, 2026cs.RO

MotorMind: Scaffolding General Vision Language Models for Zero-Shot Robot Manipulation

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have advanced robotic manipulation, but their zero-shot generalization in new tasks and environments remains limited, and their reliance on specialized training keeps them from benefiting directly from rapidly advancing general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs). In parallel, recent agentic robotic systems leverage VLMs for high-level reasoning or coding agents for robot control, but often depend on extensive external models and tools, introducing additional complexity and cost. This motivates us to ask: Can a general-purpose VLM itself operate a robot more like the human teleoperator by reasoning directly from observations, issuing actions, and continuously adapting to execution feedback, without relying on external models such as learned action experts, coding agents or grounding tools like SAM3? In this work, we introduce MotorMind, a robot manipulation harness that connects VLM-proposed mid-level actions to deterministic robot control and feedback, with asynchronous monitoring and background memory updates. Without task-specific policy training, coding agents, or additional grounding tools such as SAM3, MotorMind achieves 66.7% success on the base LIBERO-PRO suites and 53.8% under perturbations, compared with at most 13.3% and 19.2%, respectively, for the prior zero-shot methods we evaluate. The same interface reaches 95% average success on a real xArm6 robot across direct manipulation and human-perturbation settings. Replacing the backbone with a stronger VLM further improves performance, while the remaining failures - primarily due to visual grounding, embodied reasoning, and action knowledge - decrease as VLM capability improves. These results show that a general-purpose VLM, when equipped with an appropriate mid-level action representation and asynchronous execution harness, can perform effective zero-shot robotic manipulation.

Bingxuan Li, Siqi Song, Yizhuo Wu +3

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Zero-Shot Robotic Manipulation Generalization in Robotic Manipulation Robotic Manipulation VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Sep 28, 2026cs.CV

What Makes World Action Models Generalize? An Empirical Study of Test-Time Future Modeling

World action models (WAMs) predict the future alongside actions during training. Due to the heavy computation cost of video denoising, whether the future must still be generated during inference is disputed: Explicit WAMs denoise it into clean frames along with every action chunk, whereas Latent WAMs discard it entirely for acceleration. We find that latent WAMs, despite matching explicit ones on in-distribution tasks, fail to retain the generalization benefits that originally motivated WAMs. To demonstrate this, we evaluate generalization along three axes: environmental perturbation, data efficiency, and task generalization. Controlled comparisons with a matched backbone, training data, and budget reveal consistent degradation across all three axes when the action expert no longer conditions on future representations. Further analysis shows that the gap arises almost entirely from the first denoising step: the benefit comes from preparing the future, not generating it. We therefore propose Simple-WAM, which simplifies future modeling into a single forward pass of fully noised video tokens and adapts the training-time noise schedule to this inference behavior. Across simulation and real-world tasks, Simple-WAM achieves the best of both worlds, leading explicit WAMs in generalization performance with efficiency comparable to Latent WAMs. Project Page: https://zrporz.github.io/Simple-WAM-Web/

Renping Zhou, Zanlin Ni, Zihao Fan +8

Leap Lab, Tsinghua University · University of Science and Technology of China · Beijing Institute of Technology

Action-Conditioned World Models Efficient VLA Model Inference Efficient Inference for World Action Models World Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Sep 27, 2026cs.CV

Resolving State-Representation Mismatch: State-Space Visual Reasoning for Open-Loop VLA Planning

Despite rapid progress in vision-language-action (VLA) models, existing reasoning paradigms still face a fundamental \emph{state-representation mismatch} in open-loop planning. Given only an initial observation, models must internally simulate action-conditioned state transitions, whereas text-, pixel-, and latent-space reasoning can suffer from lossy spatial compression, error-accumulating visual generation, and bypass of intermediate latent tokens, respectively, undermining reliable long-horizon planning. We propose \textbf{State-Space Visual Reasoning} (SSVR), which decouples static visual context, language constraints, and a recurrent latent state. SSVR encodes the initial image and instruction once, then conditions each action prediction on the latent state and updates it with an action-conditioned GRU. Using Qwen2.5-VL as the backbone, SSVR achieves 99.5/99.6, 96.3/98.0, and 83.9/90.6 EM/PR on FrozenLake, Maze, and MiniBehavior, substantially outperforming prior methods. Extensive experiments support the effectiveness of recurrent state modeling for VLA open-loop planning across input transformations and transfer settings. By reusing static visual-textual context and updating a compact recurrent state, SSVR supports efficient multi-step inference, achieving up to

98.58\times

faster Maze decoding rollouts than the evaluated baselines with the prefix cache prebuilt.

Junhao Xiao, Haoxiang Zhao, Menghao Fang +8

FDU · HUST · TJU +2

Efficient VLA Model Inference Vision-Language-Action Models State Tracking Reasoning for VLA Models

Sep 24, 2026cs.RO

AdaHVLA: Adaptive Harnesses for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Execution

Vision-language-action (VLA) models offer strong local control and instruction following but often struggle with long-horizon tasks requiring persistent memory and planning. Task harnesses provide persistent context for agent reasoning by retaining task history and tracking progress across execution stages. To bring these complementary capabilities together, we introduce AdaHVLA, an adaptive harness that refines code-based coordination policies through robot experience to better align agent reasoning and memory with VLA execution. Its decoupled multiagent adaptation process separates evidence analysis, harness revision, and behavioral assessment into distinct working contexts, using testable coordination hypotheses to guide revisions and subsequent rollouts to assess their predicted effects. A stateful revision graph links execution evidence, hypotheses, revisions, and observed effects, preserving alternative harnesses and adaptation memory to guide refinement across repeated attempts and continued adaptation across tasks and environments. In simulation, AdaHVLA raises mean test success on NaVILA-LH from 22.5% to as high as 57.5% and improves manipulation test success across three VLA backbones by up to 30.8 percentage points over the initial harness. Real-world deployment further illustrates how the adapted policies support stable execution across task stages.

Junyi Tang, Jie Peng, Zezhen Ding +2

UNC · USTC · HKUST +1

Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation Agent Harness Optimization Vision-Language-Action Models Memory-Augmented Agents Reasoning for VLA Models

Sep 16, 2026cs.RO

GroundingVLN: Reasoning and Acting with Grounding for Vision-Language Navigation

Although vision-language models (VLMs) possess strong visual understanding and reasoning capabilities, existing vision-and-language navigation (VLN) agents struggle to connect semantic reasoning with spatial execution. Two coupled gaps remain in this connection, as intermediate reasoning is not explicitly anchored to visual evidence and high-level decisions lack precise spatial goals to guide low-level motion. Cognitive science suggests that human navigation bridges these levels hierarchically by anchoring cognition to relevant landmarks and guiding locomotion toward spatial goals. Motivated by this principle, we propose GroundingVLN, which uses visual grounding as a shared interface between reasoning and action. GroundingVLN first reasons with grounding by anchoring task-relevant visual evidence to precise image locations throughout structured reasoning. It then acts through grounding by predicting a progress-aligned pixel goal that a geometric planner translates into primitive actions. To learn these capabilities, we construct GroundingCOTVLN-188K, a dataset of temporally aligned grounded reasoning traces, and introduce Grounded and Execution-Aware Reinforcement Learning (GEAR), which aligns grounded reasoning and spatial decisions with downstream execution. Experiments demonstrate that GroundingVLN achieves state-of-the-art performance (69.9% SR on R2R-CE and 75.1% SR on RxR-CE) with high sample efficiency, using just 0.9% as much training data as the strongest baseline. It also generalizes strongly across datasets, attaining 59.9% SR on RxR-CE when trained solely on R2R, a gain of 20.1% over the strongest baseline. Code and models will be released after review.

Kailing Li, Yu Han, Tianwen Qian +4

School of Computer Science and Technology, East China Normal University · NeoteAI · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Vision-Language Navigation Vision-Language Grounding Visually Grounded Reasoning RL for VLMs Reasoning for VLA Models

Aug 13, 2026cs.RO

Decoding Task Progress from VLA Representations

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) are moving rapidly towards deployment as general-purpose manipulation policies, but we currently lack basic tools for understanding what these models represent internally or for monitoring them at runtime. Leveraging ideas from mechanistic interpretability, we probe the residual stream of

π_{0.5}

and find that task progress, the normalized time remaining in a trajectory, is linearly readable from the activations. We find that this signal is present in the pretrained PaliGemma backbone prior to training on any robot-specific data. A single linear probe generalizes to unseen tasks and varies under language counterfactuals when trained on multi-prompt data, but does not enable meaningful steering of the policy. These properties make the signal directly useful for instrumenting deployed VLAs. We use the probe as a simple label-free OOD detector, which detects stalled task progress, and find it competitive with state-of-the-art methods. Our results suggest that VLAs have rich, linearly readable internal representations of semantic quantities like task progress, and that learning to read these signals offers a lightweight, interpretable path toward monitoring deployed visuomotor policies.

Atiksh Bhardwaj, Edward Weiyi Duan, Prithwish Dan +2

Cornell University

Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Aug 12, 2026cs.RO

G0.5: One Autoregressive Stream for Robot Reasoning and Action

The prevailing recipe for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models couples a pretrained VLM with a separately trained flow-matching action expert. This makes the VLM a context encoder rather than a decision-maker. We introduce G0.5, a pretrained autoregressive VLA in which a single transformer decoder emits reasoning and action tokens under a single objective. Three components make this tractable at foundation-model scale: a learnable cross-embodiment action tokenizer that maps heterogeneous robot actions into a shared vocabulary; a native chain-of-thought stream interleaving task decomposition, object grounding, and action hints with action tokens; and a visual memory module that injects multi-second history through the vision encoder. Because reasoning and action share a single set of weights, the pretrained VLM's capabilities carry over to physical behavior: the model follows instructions closely, and prompts directly steer action granularity, task horizon, and out-of-distribution scene handling without further training. Pretrained on a large collection of robot datasets together with VQA samples, G0.5 surpasses state-of-the-art models across 7 independent regimes: real-world fine-tuning on R1lite and R1pro robots (76.7% vs.\ 53.3% for

π_{0.5}

and 24.4% for GR00T-N1.7), the 2025 BEHAVIOR Challenge on 50 long-horizon household mobile manipulation tasks using a generalist policy (31.4% vs.\ 26.3% for

π_{0.5}

and 26.1% for the challenge winner), DROID post-training followed by zero-shot transfer to an unseen environment and objects (82.5%), a language-following Pick-and-Place benchmark, LIBERO (98.9%), RoboTwin 2.0 (93.3%), and SimplerEnv-Bridge (87.3%).

Yicheng Liu, Zibin Dong, Baijun Ye +24

Galaxea Team

Cross-Embodiment Robot Learning VLM Reasoning Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Aug 12, 2026cs.RO

StellaVLA: In-Context Structured Demonstration for Generalizable Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models can follow instructions and manipulate objects, but their performance often collapses out of distribution (OOD), when the scene, viewpoint, or object differs from training. Adapting to each new situation typically requires collecting more data and fine-tuning. We present StellaVLA, a framework that instead adapts at test time by conditioning on a single retrieved demonstration. The key idea is to move beyond imitating what an expert did and instead convey why: an automated offline pipeline converts each raw trajectory into a structured demonstration, e.g., a task plan, sub-goal descriptions, and verbalized 3D motion, at zero human-annotation cost. Provided as in-context guidance, this structured demonstration lets the policy reason about the task rather than mimic a pixel trajectory, which also makes it transferable across embodiments (real-robot, human-hand, or XR demonstrations). A parallel dual-training design internalizes this reasoning during training through a joint action-and-language objective, while inference uses the action expert alone, preserving real-time, high-frequency control with no added latency. On the VLA-Arena leaderboard(Aug 1, 2026), StellaVLA ranks first with an overall score of 0.63, versus 0.44 and 0.22 for the strong prior models (

π_{0.5}

and LingBot-VLA), and it further leads on LIBERO with 98.8% average success rate and LIBERO-Plus with 85.1% success rate. Our real-robot benchmark demonstrates that StellaVLA can use both human/robot demos and human-to-robot (XR) demos as in-context structured demonstration to help VLA model adapt to OOD tasks.

Siyu Xu, Yunke Wang, Zijian Wang +6

StellarEdge AI Technical Team

Continual Learning for VLA Models Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models Test-Time Adaptation of VLA Models Instruction Generalization in VLA Models Robustness of VLA Models+1

Aug 7, 2026cs.RO

Depth-Wise Probing and Pruning of the Planning Token in a Driving Vision-Language-Action Model

Vision-language-action (VLA) models route driving decisions through a deep language model, but it is unclear how much of that depth the action itself requires. We study a representative driving VLA whose entire plan is carried by a single planning token that a generative planner decodes into a trajectory. Borrowing the planner as a trajectory-space logit lens, we decode the planning token from every one of the 32 decoder layers and measure two signals: the linear decodability of the navigation command and trajectory compatibility with the frozen native planner. Our diagnostic shows that semantic intent is linearly decodable early: command-probe accuracy reaches 97.7% after the first decoder layer, compared with 16.7% chance. In contrast, compatibility with the frozen native planner improves gradually across depth, with open-loop Avg-L2 reaching its minimum of 2.11,m only at the final layer. Learned readouts from the first layer recover much of this gap, indicating that planning information is already present early but is not yet represented in the format expected by the deployed planner. Ranking decoder layers by the angular deviation they induce in the planning token permits removal of 8 of 32 layers within an approximately 5% relative open-loop error increase and yields a measured 1.33

\times

decoder speedup. At the evaluated sample size, no family-specific degradation is statistically resolved. These findings are limited to the evaluated ORION checkpoint and Bench2Drive setup.

Harisankar Babu, Benjamin Coors, Christopher Lang +3

Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany · Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

VLMs for Autonomous Driving Efficient VLA Model Inference Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Aug 7, 2026cs.AI

Capek 0.5: An Execution-Centric Vision-Language Model for Embodied Intelligence

Vision-language models are increasingly serving as the reasoning core of embodied agents. Robot execution is inherently iterative: each action reshapes the scene and physical state, continually renewing what must be perceived, reasoned about, and verified. Meeting these demands requires complementary capabilities that differ in supervision signals, prediction formats, and verification criteria. Existing approaches typically develop these capabilities against isolated, task-specific objectives, leaving open how they should be organized and integrated around execution as a whole. We present Capek 0.5, an embodied vision-language model built around an execution-centric capability taxonomy. Rather than organizing training by datasets or tasks, the taxonomy groups embodied capabilities according to their functional roles throughout execution and comprises four capability families: Spatial Reasoning, Temporal Understanding, Action Guidance, and State Verification. Each capability is first acquired by a dedicated specialist through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards from a shared backbone, and the specialists are then consolidated into a single inference-time model through weight-space merging followed by routed policy-space distillation. We instantiate Capek 0.5 at the 2B and 35B-A3B scales and evaluate it from three complementary perspectives: comprehensive benchmark suites including Capek-StateBench, a new benchmark for state verification; a controlled study of capability retention from specialists to the unified model; and closed-loop evaluation in simulated embodied environments. Capek 0.5 improves the large majority of matched benchmark rows over its initialization, retains all four specialized capabilities in one checkpoint with quantified losses, and transfers to closed-loop embodied task execution.

Ying Chen, Weizhen Li, Zhe Hu +7

XPENG ROBOTICS

VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models Embodied Reasoning

Aug 7, 2026cs.RO

AtlasVLA: Persistent World-Ego State Modeling for Vision-Language-Action Models

While Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have advanced embodied AI, their fundamentally reactive paradigm severely limits performance in partially observable and long-horizon tasks. When restricted to a single wrist-mounted camera, they inevitably suffer from perception forgetting as objects exit the field of view, and temporal task-progress forgetting} during multi-step execution. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose AtlasVLA, a novel framework that transitions from direct reactive manipulation to proactive reasoning through a persistent world-ego state. AtlasVLA features a dual-memory architecture: a 4D Persistent World State Memory that lifts transient 2D observations into a globally updated, voxel-hashed spatial state to resolve visual blind spots, and an Ego-Working State Memory that tracks historical ego state and task progress. By conditioning a diffusion transformer (DiT) on this joint World-Ego state, AtlasVLA enables robust spatial reasoning. Extensive evaluations across LIBERO, RLBench, and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that AtlasVLA achieves state-of-the-art performance using solely a wrist camera. Remarkably, it decisively outperforms multi-view baselines, yielding absolute success rate improvements of 9.4% on LIBERO-Long and 17.5% in real-world long-horizon tasks.

Guiyu Zhao, Longteng Guo, Yanghong Mei +7

Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Beijing Freedo Technology Co., Ltd. +1

Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Aug 6, 2026cs.RO

In-Context VLA: Endowing Vision-Language-Action Models with Language via In-Context Post-Training and Agentic Tool Use

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become the dominant recipe for generalist manipulation, yet they are almost universally trained by behavior cloning: a policy imitates expert action chunks conditioned on a static image and a fixed instruction. A natural remedy is to inject explicit reasoning through textual chain-of-thought (CoT). We show, both empirically and analytically, that free-form textual CoT degrades low-level control: the reasoning it produces is ungrounded, its latency breaks closed-loop timing, and, crucially, the reasoning and action tokens are optimized against conflicting objectives so that the policy learns to narrate rather than to act. We argue that what a VLA needs is not the ability to generate language, but the ability to consume grounded language. To this end we introduce \textbf{\ourmethod{}}, a framework that endows a VLA with language competence through (i) in-context post-training, in which perceptual evidence is injected as structured context and the model is supervised only on actions, and (ii) an agentic tool-use interface, in which the policy queries open-vocabulary detectors, monocular depth, and a vision--language model to actively acquire task-relevant information. Rather than emitting a single templated caption, our data engine produces diverse, paraphrased, and evidence-conditioned spatial descriptions, so that the policy learns to interpret language it has never seen verbatim. Across the RoboCasa-GR1, SimplerEnv, and LIBERO simulation benchmarks, together with 8 real-world robot manipulation tasks, our method consistently achieves SOTA results in both performance and efficiency when compared with CoT-based approaches under matched configurations.

Jiarui Yang, Wen Huang, Jiale Zhang +2

Nankai University · Tsinghua University · Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL)

ICL for Robotics Continual Learning for VLA Models Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Aug 5, 2026cs.RO

Explicit Language Memory for Long-Horizon Planning in Vision-Language-Action Models

Vision-language-action (VLA) models provide a unified paradigm for connecting visual perception, language understanding, and robotic control. However, existing VLA models still face major challenges in long-horizon tasks: sparse expert demonstrations constrain cross-task compositional generalization; the non-Markovian nature of long-horizon tasks makes it difficult for policies conditioned only on current observations to maintain temporal consistency; limited closed-loop error correction allows execution errors to accumulate; and end-to-end action fine-tuning may weaken the high-level semantic representations of vision-language model (VLM) backbones. To address these issues, we propose a hierarchical long-horizon VLA architecture with an explicit language-memory module. The central idea is to convert discrete temporal observations into a coherent textual memory sequence with temporal logic. The system is decoupled into a high-level VLM and a low-level VLA: the high-level VLM performs semantic reasoning through a visual question answering training paradigm, while the low-level VLA executes precise continuous control conditioned on subtask instructions and visual observations. The high-level VLM recursively updates both language memory and subtask instructions using the previous memory as a contextual anchor, enabling persistent temporal tracking and dynamic correction during long-horizon execution. We evaluate the proposed method in multiple simulation environments and conduct sim-to-real experiments on a real robotic platform. The results demonstrate that explicit language memory improves the success rate and robustness of VLA models on complex long-horizon tasks while providing an interpretable semantic account of the decision process.

Houze Xu, Jizhong Li, Ziyi Ye

Fudan University

Memory-Augmented VLMs Vision-Language-Action Models VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Jul 28, 2026cs.AI

CoTinyVLA: Chain-of-Thought Distillation for a Sub-Billion-Parameter Vision-Language-Action Model

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models translate natural-language commands into robot action sequences, but leading systems on the LIBERO-Plus robustness benchmark use three- to seven-billion-parameter backbones whose memory demands can exceed embedded robotic budgets. We present CoTinyVLA, a 0.9B-parameter action model on a Qwen3.5-0.8B backbone that obtains that robustness by structuring supervision instead of enlarging the model. Three components target different axes of the problem: dual-view temporal input of 16 history frames per step with textual camera and time markers; hierarchical chain-of-thought (CoT) distillation from a 35B teacher into an episode-level Plan and a chunk-level Think span over task phase, gripper state and next subaction; and paraphrase augmentation expanding 40 base commands into 800 variants. On LIBERO-Plus, spanning 10,030 perturbed tasks across seven perturbation dimensions, CoTinyVLA reaches 90.8% on Spatial, 87.3% on Object, 86.6% on Goal and 80.7% on Long, leading the strongest 7B baseline on all four suites by 4.7, 2.8, 15.9 and 3.0 points, with every margin interval excluding zero. The gains concentrate on the hardest axes of the benchmark: across the eleven published baselines none exceeds 53.2% on Robot Initial States in any suite, whereas CoTinyVLA reaches 73.6% on Goal against 39.9% for the strongest baseline. Ablations show the three components to be separable by perturbation axis, and at a matched image budget how frames are divided between the two cameras and across time accounts for 8.6 points on its own. Closed-loop inference peaks at 2.25 GiB of allocated GPU memory, and paired interventions show the episode Plan to be load-bearing: replacing it with an empty or contradictory span costs 40 to 45 points of success. Structured supervision thus lets a 0.9B backbone exceed all of them. Code: https://github.com/BrainJellyPie/CoTinyVLA

Minhyeok Lee, Chiyoung Kim, Chanhoe Gu +5

Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea

CoT Distillation Efficient VLA Model Inference Efficient VLA Models Vision-Language-Action Models Robustness of VLA Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Jul 20, 2026cs.RO

Reasoning as a Double-Edged Sword: Architecture and Cross-Stage Robustness in Vision-Language-Action Models

Does adding a reasoning step make a Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model more robust to perturbation? Intuitively, a policy that reasons before acting should absorb a perturbed input better than one that maps observations directly to actions. We test this premise head-on across three models that span the reasoning spectrum (no reasoning, a text chain-of-thought, and a latent iterative loop), perturbing each at the vision, reasoning, and action stages on LIBERO and SimplerEnv. Two questions organize the study: does the reasoning design shift robustness, and can the reasoning be read back at runtime as a safety signal? We find that the latent-iterative model is by far the least robust: under both stochastic noise and white-box perturbation its task success collapses, while the other two hold. This fragility is structural rather than cumulative: varying the reasoning depth at inference barely moves it. Reasoning outputs can in principle be monitored, but the monitors fail under fair tests. A plan--action consistency probe that looks near-perfect under naive evaluation falls to chance under adaptive attack. Under matched-FPR calibration, fusing it with an action-anomaly probe never lifts defended success above undefended. Scoped to these output-level behavioral probes under white-box vision-stage attack, this ceiling is a precondition that any viable defense must first satisfy.

Tuan Duong Trinh, Naveed Akhtar, Basim Azam

University of Melbourne Parkville, VIC, Australia

Neural Network Robustness Adversarial Attacks on VLA Models Vision-Language-Action Models VLMs for Robotics Robustness of VLA Models Reasoning for VLA Models+1

Jul 14, 2026cs.CV

ReflectVLN: Training Vision-Language Navigation Agents with Reflective Reasoning

Existing vision-language navigation methods often couple a VLM with waypoint decoders to produce multi-step action plans, but they typically lack an explicit closed-loop mechanism for tracking semantic progress, diagnosing execution failures, and recovering from error accumulation in long-horizon navigation. To address this gap, we propose ReflectVLN, an agentic VLN framework that organizes decision-making through bidirectionally interactive intention and execution agents. The intention agent performs subtask decomposition and reflection, generating executable subtask descriptions as corrective plans. Conditioned on these descriptions, the execution agent grounds them into short-horizon actions under current observations while monitoring sub-goal progress and detecting off-track behavior. Crucially, ReflectVLN enables closed-loop bidirectional communication: the execution agent emits progress and deviation signals to trigger reflection and subtask updates on demand, and the intention agent returns structured guidance that reconditions subsequent actions for recovery. To encourage temporally coherent decisions with interpretable intermediate rationales, we introduce Action Chain-of-Thought (Action-CoT), a path-conditioned dual-query training scheme for action generation. Experiments on standard VLN benchmarks show that ReflectVLN improves success rates and path efficiency under a constrained data budget, with favorable training cost and fewer high-level intention calls at inference time, while providing interpretable intermediate decisions for analysis and collaboration. Code is available at: https://github.com/AIprogrammer/ReflectVLN

Jiahang Wang, Yirong Yang, Yanqing Zhu +4

Amap, Alibaba Group, China · Beihang University

Hierarchical Planning Vision-Language Navigation Reasoning for VLA Models Vision-Language Agents

Jul 13, 2026cs.RO

See like a Robot: Robot-Centric Pointmaps for VLA Models

Vision-language-action (VLA) models require 3D spatial reasoning, yet RGB observations encode robot-object geometry only implicitly. Lifting depth with camera intrinsics makes this geometry explicit as dense, image-aligned pointmaps, but their camera-frame coordinates depend on camera placement. We propose SeeR-VLA, which transforms pointmaps into a robot-centric frame with an end-effector origin and robot-base-aligned axes. An encoder initialized from pretrained RGB weights extracts pointmap features, which are added to corresponding RGB tokens without increasing the token count. Across 24 RoboCasa tasks and four real-world tasks, SeeR-VLA improves average success over RGB-only

π_{0.5}

by 6.4 and 32.5 percentage points, respectively. It also exceeds the strongest evaluated 3D-augmented baseline, PointVLA, by 3.5 and 23.7 percentage points, respectively. Beyond these gains, our ablations clarify how coordinate choices affect VLA performance, showing that end-effector centering is most effective with robot-base-aligned axes. The benefits grow as training viewpoints diversify, highlighting the importance of using robot-frame pointmaps when learning from diverse camera configurations.

Byungkun Lee, Dongyoon Hwang, Dongjin Kim +4

KAIST AI · Holiday Robotics

Visuomotor Policy Learning Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models Robotic Perception Reasoning for VLA Models

Jul 9, 2026cs.CV

LEEVLA: Seeing What Matters in Latent Environment Evolution for Vision-Language-Action

Vision-language-action (VLA) models aim to map multimodal inputs to robot actions. However, most existing approaches struggle to cover complex dynamic scenarios due to treating all visual tokens uniformly and reasoning with human-selected factors, which lack mechanisms to emphasize task-critical evidence and ignore underlying factors. To address this issue, we propose LEEVLA, a VLA architecture for seeing what matters in Latent Environment Evolution that explicitly guides the model toward informative regions while preserving the structured evolution of latent world representations. To identify salient and instruction-relevant regions, we introduce drift-guided dynamic prioritization (DGDP), which combines dynamic position prioritization (DPP) with semantic drift guidance (SDG) to guide the VLA agent where to attend during training. On top of this, we introduce structured feature flow generation (SFFG), which models how these prioritized features should evolve in latent space via prototype-to-periphery (P2P) prediction, and a mutual-neighborhood contrastive (MC) loss to maintain topological consistency among neighborhoods. Together, DGDP and SFFG form a task-aware "where-how" training framework. Extensive experiments on VLA benchmarks show that LEEVLA consistently outperforms prior methods, confirming that explicit task-evidence guidance and structured latent reasoning are both crucial for scalable VLA. Our code is available at https://github.com/LyuQi127/LEEVLA.

Qi Lyu, Baicheng Liu, Xudong Wang +3

State Key Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent Systems · Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences +1

Latent Dynamics Modeling Vision-Language-Action Models Attention Mechanisms VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Jul 8, 2026cs.RO

Dual Latent Memory in Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation

Mainstream Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models predict actions primarily from the current observation under a Markovian assumption, thus struggling with long-horizon, temporally dependent tasks. Existing memory-augmented VLAs either expand the observation window or retrieve history from the memory bank as auxiliary policy-side context. However, they leave memory outside the native latent embedding space of VLA reasoning, preventing historical experience from being fluidly interleaved with multimodal reasoning and action formation. To this end, we introduce LaMem-VLA, a latent-memory-native framework that reconstructs historical experience into latent memory tokens and directly interweaves them with VLA reasoning. At its core, LaMem-VLA introduces four coordinated components: (i) a curator that organizes historical experience into two complementary short-term and long-term memory vaults; (ii) a seeker that queries both vaults using the multimodal cognition to retrieve context-relevant evidence; (iii) a condenser that reconstructs the retrieved evidence into compact short-term and long-term latent memory tokens; and (iv) a weaver that injects these memory tokens with the current observation and instruction into one continuous embedding sequence. By representing, retrieving, and consuming historical experience entirely in the same continuous latent space, LaMem-VLA enables memory to directly participate in VLA reasoning and guide action generation under a bounded context. Extensive experiments on SimplerEnv and LIBERO demonstrate the superiority of our LaMem-VLA.

Hongyu Qu, Jianzhe Gao, Xiaobin Hu +6

Nanjing University of Science and Technology · Zhejiang University · National University of Singapore

Memory-Augmented VLMs Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models Memory-Augmented Agents Reasoning for VLA Models

Jul 6, 2026cs.RO

Do Vision-Language-Action Models Mean What They Say? On the Role of Faithfulness in Embodied Reasoning

Embodied Chain-of-Thought has emerged as a promising mechanism to enhance robot decision-making and interpretability in black-box Vision-Language Action (VLA) models. However, whether this verbalized Chain-of-Thought truthfully reflects the policy's underlying decision process remains poorly understood. We distinguish between functional reasoning, in which reasoning improves task performance, and faithful reasoning, in which reasoning truly reflects the policy's internal decision process. We argue that SoTA alignment strategies offer a necessary but insufficient notion of faithfulness, admitting reasoning whose intermediate steps can mask the causal links in action prediction through confounding factors (e.g., reasoning that is ungrounded in the environment and internally disconnected or inconsistent), restricting policy generalization. We study this gap through a human evaluation of a SoTA reasoning model for autonomous driving, revealing an inconsistent coupling between reasoning quality and downstream trajectory improvement. We then operationalize a behavioral surrogate for embodied faithfulness through a learned critic, Pinocchio, scoring observation grounding and stepwise coherence, and use this critic as a dense reward signal in post-training an embodied policy with reinforcement learning. Across withheld driving benchmarks, our post-trained planner improves faithfulness by 4% and 18% over SoTA alignment and trajectory error post-training baselines, respectively, while maintaining competitive downstream task performance. Finally, on a synthetic out-of-distribution test set, post-training for faithfulness improves policy responsiveness to rare counterfactual scenarios by 1.6x that of a SoTA policy, suggesting that faithful reasoning traces contribute to more robust, generalizable, and interpretable embodied intelligence. Project page: https://mjf-su.github.io/pinocchio/

Matthew Foutter, Matteo Cercola, Lena Wild +4

Stanford University · Politecnico di Milano · KTH Royal Institute of Technology +2

VLMs for Autonomous Driving Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models Embodied Reasoning

Jul 4, 2026cs.RO

Look Before You Leap: Distilling Tree Search into Action Evaluation for Frozen VLA Models

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models acquire broad embodied capabilities through large-scale pretraining, yet their generalization remains far more fragile than that of LLMs and VLMs. The prevailing remedy, post-training via supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, improves task-specific performance but narrows the generalist capability that makes pretraining valuable. We identify a key bottleneck: VLA failures stem not only from action generation but also from action evaluation. A diagnostic pass@k study confirms that frozen VLAs already contain competent behaviors in their output distribution, with overall success rates rising from 33% at pass@1 to 92% at pass@32. Inspired by this, we propose SVA (Search, Value, and Act), a simple framework that equips frozen VLA policies with long-term consequence awareness. SVA first uses Monte-Carlo tree search in simulation to sample and explore the VLA's output distribution under a finite search budget, collecting diverse trajectories annotated with empirical returns; this knowledge is then distilled into a lightweight Q-value model that predicts the expected consequence of candidate actions; at deployment, the frozen VLA proposes multiple candidates and the evaluator selects the one with the highest uncertainty-regularized Q-value, requiring no simulator access. By decoupling action proposal from consequence evaluation, SVA preserves the generalization capacity of the VLA backbone while improving task success. Across embodied benchmarks, SVA consistently improves generalization on unseen tasks and exhibits strong test-time scaling; across real-robot manipulation tasks, it improves average success from 42.8% to 55.6% (+12.8 points). Strikingly, SVA enables a 9B VLA to outperform a 27B VLA by 7 points at 27% lower inference latency, suggesting that scaling test-time evaluation is more cost-effective than scaling model size.

Xinyi Xie, Zican Hu, Zhanyu Liu +7

Nanjing University · Australian National University · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences +1

Value Function Estimation Test-Time Scaling Vision-Language-Action Models VLMs for Robotics Reasoning for VLA Models

Jun 30, 2026cs.CV

Reasoning-aware Speculative Decoding for Efficient Vision-Language-Action Models in Autonomous Driving

Modern Vision-Language-Action (VLA) planners for autonomous driving emit a chain-of-causation (CoC) reasoning step \emph{before} producing a trajectory. The reasoning is autoregressive and dominates inference latency, while the trajectory head is parallel and cheap. Latency is an operational constraint in autonomous driving, so accelerating the reasoning step is the central problem we address. We observe that CoC reasoning has two qualitatively different needs: most tokens continue routine setup that follows naturally from the ego-trajectory history, and a small fraction encode commitments that require fresh visual evidence about an unexpected situation. We split this reasoning into two specialized paths: a \emph{routine reasoner} that handles the predictable continuation by attending to trajectory history, and a \emph{deliberative reasoner} (the unmodified VLA target) that handles novel cases by attending to current visual evidence, using the speculative decoding framework as the architectural template for how the two paths cooperate. Unlike standard speculative decoding, our routine reasoner is not a smaller replica of the target; the two reasoners are deliberately specialized to read different parts of the prompt. We propose two techniques to realize this. First, we introduce \textbf{FlatRoPE}, a 1D rotary positional embedding in the draft that breaks the rotational symmetry of the target's 3D M-RoPE, redirecting attention away from visual tokens and onto trajectory-history tokens. Second, we introduce \textbf{Action-aware RL (AARL)}, a post-training stage that uses an action-quality reward together with a static-reference KL anchor. Together, our two-reasoner system reduces the reasoning-step running time by approximately

4\times

relative to the original Alpamayo planner.

Anh Dung Dinh, Simon Khan, Flora Salim

School of Computer Science and Engineering UNSW Sydney · Air Force Research Laboratory

Efficient VLM Inference Speculative Decoding VLM Reasoning Vision-Language-Action Models Autonomous Driving Planning Reasoning for VLA Models

Jun 29, 2026cs.RO

Training Vision-Language-Action Models with Dense Embodied Chain-of-Thought Supervision

Cross-embodiment transfer in vision-language-action (VLA) models remains challenging because low-level state and action spaces differ fundamentally across robot platforms. We observe that the high-level cognitive process underlying manipulation, including scene perception, object identification, task planning, and sub-task decomposition, is largely shared across embodiments. Based on this observation, we present ZR-0, a 2.6 billion parameter end-to-end VLA model that uses dense Embodied Chain-of-Thought (ECoT) supervision to align cross-embodiment representations within the vision-language model (VLM). ZR-0 adopts a dual-stream architecture: a pre-trained VLM (System 2) generates structured ECoT reasoning during training, while a Diffusion Transformer-based action expert (System 1) produces continuous action chunks via flow matching. The two components are coupled through cross-attention, with an attention mask that restricts the action expert to input prompt features only, enabling ECoT generation to be entirely skipped at inference without any performance loss. ZR-0 is pre-trained on ProcCorpus-60M, a large-scale dataset comprising approximately 60 million frames (approximately 1,000 hours) from over 400K trajectories, with dense ECoT annotations covering 96.8% of all frames. We evaluate ZR-0 on three simulation benchmarks spanning single-arm (LIBERO), bimanual (RoboTwin 2.0), and humanoid (RoboCasa GR-1 Tabletop) embodiments, as well as real-world experiments on the xArm platform, demonstrating strong performance across all settings. Code and model checkpoints are available at https://github.com/RUCKBReasoning/ZR-0.

Haoyang Li, Guanlin Li, Youhe Feng +9

1Renmin University of China · 2Zhipu AI

Cross-Embodiment Robot Learning Robotic Manipulation Vision-Language-Action Models Reasoning for VLA Models

Jun 28, 2026cs.RO

Position: Vision-Language-Action Models Cannot Be Verified to Perform Physical Reasoning

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) systems, built on pretrained vision-language models (VLMs), have shown rapidly improving performance on robot manipulation benchmarks. These gains are commonly interpreted as evidence that semantic representations learned from internet-scale data transfer to physical execution generalization. This position paper argues that the assumption underlying this interpretation -- that semantic generalization is sufficient to support physical action decisions -- has not been independently verified and cannot be tested under current evaluation protocols. We support this claim by decomposing VLA policies into semantic mapping and physical action decision, and showing that task success rate -- the dominant evaluation metric -- cannot distinguish between these two sources of capability. As a result, improvements in benchmark performance are consistent with multiple competing explanations, including semantic matching, distributional overlap, and genuine physical generalization. We further argue that this identifiability gap has been reinforced through narrative drift, whereby successive systems inherit and strengthen prior interpretations of performance gains without isolating the underlying causal mechanism. To address this limitation, we propose a research direction based on evaluation designs that introduce controlled variation to separately measure semantic and physical generalization. Such designs make it possible to causally attribute performance without requiring access to model internals, and to empirically assess the role of VLM backbones as semantic interfaces rather than implicit sources of physical competence. Our goal is not to refute the role of VLMs in robotics, but to clarify the conditions under which claims of physical generalization can be meaningfully evaluated.

Taozhao Chen, Ian Manchester, Huaming Chen

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia · School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering The University of Sydney Sydney, NSW, Australia

VLM Evaluation Physical Reasoning Generalization in Robotic Manipulation Robotics Vision-Language-Action Models Robot Manipulation Benchmarks+1

Jun 27, 2026cs.RO

TAP-VLA: Tactile Annotation Prompting for Vision Language Action Models

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate impressive reasoning over visual, semantic, and spatial task variations by leveraging large-scale vision and language pre-training. They remain, however, largely blind to contact forces, which seldom manifest clearly in visual feedback but are central to contact-rich manipulation. Tactile sensing measures these forces directly, but integrating it into VLAs is difficult: tactile data is absent from the large-scale corpora used to pre-train VLAs, so adding it as a new input modality induces a distribution shift that erodes the very pre-training that makes VLAs effective. We propose Tactile Annotation Prompting for Vision-Language-Action models (TAP-VLA), a simple framework that supplies tactile feedback through visual augmentation rather than architectural change. TAP-VLA extracts shear fields from visuo-tactile sensors and overlays them as spatially-grounded vectors onto the multi-view RGB images the policy already consumes, yielding a clear, interpretable tactile cue in the VLA's native observation space. Because the architecture is untouched, the approach requires no tactile pre-training, adds negligible compute, and stays close to the pre-training distribution. Across four contact-rich tasks, TAP-VLA succeeds on 78% of trials, compared to under 50% for vision-only fine-tuning and alternative tactile-fusion baselines -- including tasks where the baselines perform no better than chance.

Mark Van der Merwe, Mohamad Louai Shehab, Jayjun Lee +4

Robotics Department, University of Michigan · Computer Science and Engineering Department, University of Michigan

Vision-Language-Action Models Tactile Sensing for Robotic Manipulation Reasoning for VLA Models