Reinforcement Learning

For AI systems to be useful to humans, they must understand and act in accordance with our values and preferences. Since specifying preferences is a hard task, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to develop methods that allow for inferring preferences from observed behavior. However, IRL assumes the human to be approximately optimal. This is a big limitation in cases where the human themselves may be learning to act optimally in an environment. In this paper, we formalize the problem of learning the preferences of a learning agent: a predictor observes a learner acting online and tries to infer the underlying reward function being (initially suboptimally) optimized by the learner. We model the learner as either being no-regret, or as converging to an optimal Boltzmann policy over time. In each of these settings, we establish theoretical guarantees for various preference learning algorithms, or otherwise show that such guarantees are impossible.

Reinforcement learning improves the reasoning ability of large language models but remains costly and sample-inefficient, as many rollouts provide weak learning signals. Difficulty-aware data selection methods attempt to address this by prioritizing moderately difficult prompts, yet our analysis reveals three limitations: difficulty estimates become inaccurate under policy drift, data selection alone yields limited final-performance gains, and inference efficiency remains largely unchanged. These findings suggest that efficient and effective RL requires more than filtering by difficulty: the policy should learn to solve hard tasks while producing concise responses for easy ones. To this end, we propose Dare, a unified framework that co-evolves difficulty estimation with the policy via self-normalized importance sampling, maintains diverse difficulty coverage through a symmetric Beta sampling distribution, and applies tailored training strategies across difficulty tiers with adaptive compute allocation. Extensive experiments across multiple models and domains demonstrate that Dare consistently outperforms existing methods in training efficiency, final effectiveness, and inference efficiency, producing more concise responses on easy tasks while improving correctness on hard ones. Code is available at https://github.com/EtaYang10th/DARE.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success on reasoning benchmarks through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), excelling at tasks such as math, coding, logic, and puzzles. However, existing benchmarks evaluate only correctness, while overlooking optimality, namely the ability to find the best solutions under constraints. We propose OPT-BENCH, the first comprehensive framework for training and evaluating LLMs on NP-hard optimization problems through quality-aware RLVR. OPT-BENCH provides three key components: a scalable training infrastructure with instance generators, quality verifiers, and optimal baselines across 10 tasks; a rigorous benchmark with 1,000 instances evaluating both feasibility, measured by Success Rate, and quality, measured by Quality Ratio; and quality-aware rewards that enable continuous improvement beyond binary correctness. Training on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct-1M with 15K examples achieves 93.1% SR and 46.6% QR, significantly outperforming GPT-4o, which achieves 29.6% SR and 14.6% QR. Beyond optimization, training on OPT-BENCH transfers to diverse tasks, including mathematics (+2.2%), logic (+1.2%), knowledge (+4.1%), and instruction following (+6.1%). Our analysis reveals that quality-aware rewards improve solutions by 28.8% over binary rewards, and that task diversity drives generalization more than data quantity, offering insights into RLVR scaling for complex reasoning.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has become a cornerstone for improving the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, its rollout phase constitutes a significant efficiency bottleneck, mainly arising from the long-tail bubbles across data parallel ranks, particularly in long-context scenarios where faster GPUs remain idle while waiting for stragglers. Existing solutions, such as partial rollout or asynchronous RL, mitigate these bubbles by compromising the algorithm's strict synchronous nature. Instead, we propose BubbleSpec, a novel framework that accelerates RL rollouts while strictly keeping the mathematical exactness. Instead of attempting to eliminate bubbles, BubbleSpec exploits them. We exploit the idle time windows of faster ranks to pre-generate rollout results for subsequent steps, serving as drafts for speculative decoding. Unlike prior speculative methods that rely on historical epoch similarity and warm-ups, BubbleSpec is agnostic to dataset size and provides immediate acceleration from the onset of training. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that BubbleSpec reduces decoding steps by 50% and increases rollout throughput by up to 1.8x. Critically, BubbleSpec is seamlessly compatible with various RL frameworks and strategies as it sustains the strict synchronous property of RL algorithms.

While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has proven effective for closed-ended tasks, extending it to open-ended social language games via self-play reveals a critical issue: evolution impasse. Due to the vast strategy space, language agents frequently converge to homogenized behaviors, leading to deterministic match outcomes that eliminate the gradient signals necessary for policy evolution. To tackle this issue, we propose Dual-scale Evolutionary Policy Training (DEPT) for social language games. DEPT introduces a time-scaled evolutionary perception mechanism that detects impasse by quantifying dual-scale value baseline divergence alongside match entropy. Upon perceiving the collapse, it then activates asymmetric advantage reshaping to dynamically modulate the optimization landscape for intervention. Thus, our method effectively restores gradient signals and enforces sustained strategic exploration. Extensive experiments on multiple social language games demonstrate that DEPT outperforms strong baselines, avoiding policy degeneration and driving the continuous evolution of social language agents.

A commonly accepted explanation of critic-free RL for LLMs, based on sequence-level rewards, is that it reinforces successful rollouts with a positive advantage while penalizing failed ones. In contrast, we study critic-free RL from a token-level perspective, revealing the token-flipping phenomenon: positive and negative rollouts exhibit remarkably similar proportions of tokens whose probabilities are boosted or suppressed during RL training. To explain this phenomenon, we further show that a token's change in probability is not fully determined by its own advantage; coupled gradient interactions with other tokens also play a non-negligible role. Specifically, these token coupling effects occur primarily between identical tokens that are both predicted with low confidence. Building upon this analysis, we propose the cancellation hypothesis: as a result of coupling, opposing signals cancel out for tokens shared by positive and negative rollouts, while tokens more specific to successful rollouts receive stronger reinforcement, thereby inducing hidden token-level credit assignment from rollout-level rewards. We support this hypothesis with complementary empirical evidence. (1) Compared with training on only positive rollouts, critic-free RL shifts updates from template and formatting tokens toward reasoning tokens; (2) Tokens boosted by critic-free RL consistently demonstrate higher value than suppressed tokens, regardless of whether they originate from positive or negative rollouts. Guided by this view, we implement two batching interventions to encourage or preserve cancellation in critic-free RL training: query-preserved mini-batching and reward-balanced batching. Despite their simplicity, these interventions improve RLVR training across multiple model scales, supporting cancellation as both an explanatory principle and a practical design criterion for critic-free RL training.

Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has significantly improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), particularly in multi-turn agentic settings involving environment interaction like tool use. However, fine-tuning such models remains prohibitively expensive due to high computational requirements, limiting accessibility. We propose MARLaaS (Multi-tenant Asynchronous RL as a Service), a system for concurrent RL fine-tuning across multiple users and tasks. Our approach is based on two key ideas: (1) sharing a base model across tenants using lightweight LoRA adapters, and (2) a disaggregated asynchronous architecture that decouples rollout generation, environment interaction, and policy training into independently scheduled stages. This design enables tasks to progress through the RL pipeline at their own pace in an event-driven manner, reducing cross-task interference, idle time, and end-to-end latency. In multi-task settings (we report up to 32 concurrent tasks), MARLaaS achieves single-task state-of-the-art performance while improving accelerator utilization by up to 4.3x and reducing end-to-end training time by 85%.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) generates hundreds of thousands of tokens per training step, with rollout generation dominating the computational cost. The overall token budget can be controlled along two main dimensions: (i) deciding which prompts to allocate rollouts to, and (ii) deciding how long each rollout should be. Prior work has generally controlled only one of these dimensions at a time. We show that jointly tuning both decisions under a shared compute budget improves both reasoning quality and wall-clock training time. We instantiate this view as \textbf{DU}al-controlled tok\textbf{E}n alloca\textbf{T}ion (DUET), a computationally efficient layer over GRPO that uses a lightweight pre-rollout surrogate of prompt informativeness to set how many rollouts each prompt receives, and a marker-gated abort rule with importance reweighting to set when to stop them. On Qwen3-1.7B trained on MATH, DUET outperforms full-budget GRPO and the other three budget-aware baseline methods. DUET's advantage further generalizes to other benchmarks across math and coding, and is on par with the best baseline on the scientific Q&A domain, while also achieving a $1.62\times$ wall-clock speedup. More notably, using only 50% of the token budget, DUET still outperforms all baseline methods at their full budget, achieving an even higher $2.51\times$ speedup over full-budget GRPO. We verify the high performance of DUET on other backbone LLMs, including Qwen3-4B and Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct. Notably, the gap between DUET and the strongest baseline \emph{widens} as the budget tightens, contrary to the usual pattern in which efficient methods trade off quality as compute decreases. More broadly, these results suggest that DUET budget-aware control strategies are valuable not only for accelerating training, but also for improving the quality of the learning signal.

We argue that decomposing reward into weighted, verifiable criteria and using an LLM judge to score them provides a partial-credit optimization signal: instead of a binary outcome or a single holistic score, each response is graded along multiple task-specific criteria. We formalize \emph{rubric-grounded reinforcement learning (RL)}: a framework in which the policy is optimized against a structured, multi-criterion reward produced by a frozen LLM judge that conditions on auxiliary grounding the policy never sees. We instantiate the framework by deriving rubrics from an Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)-derived corpus of roughly 100,000 scientific and technical documents and training Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). With GRPO-based training, the model achieves $71.7\%$ normalized reward on held-out rubric evaluation. The GRPO-tuned policy also improves over the base model on four reasoning benchmarks not derived from the training corpus -- GSM8K, MATH, GPQA Main, and GPQA Diamond. These results provide evidence that structured, document-grounded rewards can improve held-out rubric performance and induce transferable reasoning behaviors beyond the corpus used to construct the training environment.

Reinforcement learning (RL) for exponential-utility optimization in discounted Markov decision processes (MDPs) lacks principled value-based algorithms. We address this gap in the fixed risk-aversion setting. Building on the Bellman-type equation for exponential utility studied in \cite{porteus1975optimality}, we derive two Q-value-style extensions and show that the associated operators are contractions in the $L_\infty$ and sup-log/Thompson metrics, respectively. We characterize their fixed points and prove that the induced greedy stationary policy is optimal for the exponential-utility objective among stationary policies. These structural results lead to two model-free algorithms: a two-timescale Q-learning--style algorithm, for which we establish almost-sure convergence and provide finite-time convergence rates via timescale separation, and a one-timescale algorithm governed by a sublinear power-law operator. Since the latter does not admit a global contraction in standard metrics, we prove its convergence using delicate arguments based on local Lipschitzness, monotonicity, homogeneity, and Dini derivatives, and provide a scalar finite-time analysis that highlights the challenges in obtaining convergence rates in the vector case. Our work provides a foundation for value-based RL under exponential-utility objectives.

Susceptibilities are a technique for neural network interpretability that studies the response of posterior expectation values of observables to perturbations of the loss. We generalize this construction to the setting of the regret in deep reinforcement learning and investigate the utility of susceptibilities in a simple gridworld model that nevertheless exhibits non-trivial stagewise development. We argue that susceptibilities reveal internal features of the development of the model in parameter space that one cannot detect purely by studying the development of the learned policy. We validate these results with activation-steering, and discuss the framework's extension to RLHF post-training.

Optimizing dynamic risk with stochastic policies is challenging in both policy updates and value learning. The former typically requires transition perturbation, while the latter may rely on model-based approaches. To address these challenges, we propose a surrogate policy gradient without transition perturbation under softmax policy parameterization. We further develop model-free value learning methods for dynamic expectile and conditional value-at-risk by leveraging elicitability. Finally, inspired by Expected SARSA and Expected Policy Gradient, a model-free off-policy actor-critic algorithm is constructed. Empirical results in domains with verifiable risk-averse behavior show that our algorithm can learn risk-averse policy and consistently outperforms other existing methods.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a standard algorithm for reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards, but its group-mean-centered advantage can fail under binary rewards. The failure mode is gradient starvation: when every response in a group is correct or every response is wrong, the centered advantage is exactly zero and the policy receives no learning signal. We prove that the true degeneracy rate always exceeds the i.i.d. Bernoulli prediction by Jensen's inequality, and observe a 0.69 degeneracy rate at group size four in logged Qwen3.5-9B GSM8K training. We then show that the fixed-reference Sign advantage, $A=2r-1$, performs pass@$G$ failure descent by increasing the probability that at least one sample in the group succeeds. On the full GSM8K test set across seven seeds, Sign reaches 73.8% accuracy versus 28.4% for standard normalized group-mean DrGRPO at group size four, a 45.4 point gain with $p<0.0001$. The effect is directionally consistent on Llama-3.1-8B and positive but underpowered on a MATH-500 transfer check. Pass@$k$ analysis indicates that the main benefit is search compression rather than large capacity expansion, aligning the empirical gains with recent RLVR ceiling observations.

Instruction following is a fundamental capability of large language models (LLMs), yet continuously improving this capability remains challenging. Existing methods typically rely either on costly external supervision from humans or strong teacher models, or on self-play training with static-difficulty instructions that cannot evolve as the model's capabilities improve. To address these limitations, we propose SEIF (Self-Evolving Reinforcement Learning for Instruction Following), a self-evolving framework for enhancing the instruction-following ability of LLMs. SEIF forms a closed self-evolution loop that improves the model's instruction-following ability, where instruction difficulty evolution and model capability evolution reinforce each other. SEIF consists of four roles: an Instructor that generates increasingly challenging instructions, a Filter that removes conflicting or invalid instructions to ensure data quality, a Follower that learns to follow evolved instructions, and a Judger that provides reward signals for reinforcement learning. The Instructor and Follower are alternately trained and co-evolve throughout the process. Experiments across multiple model scales and architectures show that SEIF consistently improves instruction-following performance, suggesting strong generality. Further analyses reveal the sources of improvement and identify an effective training strategy for self-evolution on open-ended tasks: sufficient early-stage training to build a solid foundation, followed by moderate late-stage training to mitigate overfitting and achieve better final performance. The code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/Rainier-rq1/SEIF.

Conventional visual object trackers localize targets using handcrafted spatial priors, often in the form of heatmaps. Such priors provide only surrogate supervision and are poorly aligned with tracking optimization and evaluation metrics, such as intersection over union (IoU) and area under the success curve (AUC). Here, we introduce RELO, a REinforcement-learning-to-LOcalize method for visual object tracking that formulates target localization as a Markov decision process. Specifically, RELO replaces handcrafted spatial priors with a localization policy learned over spatial positions via reinforcement learning, with rewards combining frame-level IoU and sequence-level AUC. We additionally introduce layer-aligned temporal token propagation to improve semantic consistency across frames, with negligible computational overhead. Across multiple benchmarks, RELO achieves superior results, attaining 57.5% AUC on LaSOText without template updates. This confirms that reward-driven localization provides an effective alternative to prior-driven localization for visual object tracking.

In-context reinforcement learning (ICRL) studies agents that, after pretraining, adapt to new tasks by conditioning on additional context without parameter updates. Existing theoretical analyses of ICRL largely rely on linear attention, which replaces the softmax function in the standard attention with an identity mapping. This paper provides the first theoretical understanding of ICRL without making the unrealistic linear attention simplification. In particular, we consider the standard softmax attention used in practice. We show that, with certain parameters, the layerwise forward pass of a Transformer with such softmax attention is equivalent to iterative updates of a weighted softmax temporal difference (TD) learning algorithm. Here, weighted softmax TD is a new RL algorithm that performs policy evaluation in kernel space and adopts both linear TD and tabular TD as special cases. We also prove that under a certain contraction condition, the policy evaluation error decays as the number of layers grows, with the identified parameters above. Finally, we prove that those parameters are a global minimizer of a pretraining loss, explaining their emergence in our numerical experiments.

In large-scale reinforcement learning (RL) systems with decoupled Trainer-Rollout execution, the Trainer must regularly synchronize policy weights to the Rollout side to limit policy staleness. When inter-node bandwidth is abundant, such synchronization is usually only a small fraction of end-to-end cost. As model size grows, however, the communication demand rises rapidly. In bandwidth-constrained or network-variable deployments -- for example, cross-datacenter or cross-cluster settings, heterogeneous resource pools, and online RL -- weight synchronization can become a dominant bottleneck for throughput and tail latency. We observe that, in mainstream large-model RL training, the locations where parameters actually change are highly sparse at the element level (often 99%+ sparsity). Building on this observation, we propose and implement SparseRL-Sync, which replaces full-weight transfers with a lossless sparse update payload (indices and values) that can be exactly reconstructed on the inference side, thereby preserving 100% fidelity. Under a simplified cost model, sparse synchronization reduces the per-update communication volume from S to approximately S/X; with 99% sparsity (X ~ 100), this yields about a 100x reduction in transmitted data. Combined with appropriate bucketing, SparseRL-Sync also reduces launch and control-plane overhead, significantly improving scalability and end-to-end efficiency in bandwidth-limited and highly asynchronous RL settings.

We introduce Mutual Reinforcement Learning, a framework for concurrent RL post-training in which heterogeneous LLM policies exchange typed experience while keeping separate parameters, objectives, and tokenizers. The framework combines a Shared Experience Exchange (SEE), Multi-Worker Resource Allocation (MWRA), and a Tokenizer Heterogeneity Layer (THL) that retokenizes text and aligns token-level traces across incompatible vocabularies. This substrate makes the experience-sharing design question operational across model families. We instantiate three controlled probes on top of GRPO: data-level rollout sharing via Peer Rollout Pooling (PRP), value-level advantage sharing via Cross-Policy GRPO Advantage Sharing (XGRPO), and outcome-level success transfer via Success-Gated Transfer (SGT). A contextual-bandit analysis characterizes their structural positions on a stability-support trade-off: PRP pays density-ratio variance and THL residual costs, XGRPO preserves on-policy actor support while changing scalar baselines, and SGT supplies a rescue-set score direction toward verified peer successes. In the evaluated regime, outcome-level sharing occupies the favorable point of this trade-off.

For continuous state-action space scenarios, classical reinforcement learning (RL) theory predominantly focuses on low-rank Markov decision processes (MDPs), which provide sample-efficient guarantees at the expense of restrictive structural assumptions. Kernel smoothing model-based approaches offer a promising alternative paradigm that instead leverages the smoothness of the MDP and employs non-parametric kernel smoothing estimates of transition dynamics. This paper proposes a new kernel-smoothing model-based approach for online reinforcement learning in finite-horizon settings under Lipschitz continuity assumptions on the MDP. By incorporating a Bernstein-style exploration bonus into the kernel smoothing framework, our method achieves a regret bound which improves upon the state-of-the-art regret bound in its dependence on the horizon. The theoretical advancement relies on a delicate analysis of the synergy between Bernstein-style bonuses and kernel smoothing, where a new tight Bernstein-type concentration inequality for martingales may be of independent interest.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has become a highly effective method for improving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Recent research shows that Negative Sample Reinforcement (NSR) -- which focuses on penalizing incorrect steps rather than simply rewarding correct ones -- can match or even exceed the performance of more complex frameworks like PPO and GRPO across the entire Pass@k spectrum. However, current NSR techniques usually apply a fixed penalty throughout the training process and treat every incorrect response with the same weight. To address these limitations, we propose two extensions to the NSR framework: Adaptive Negative Sample Reinforcement. Rather than using a fixed update rule, A-NSR uses time-dependent scheduling functions. In the initial training phases, the system focuses heavily on correcting errors to stabilize the model. As training continues, it shifts toward more subtle and controlled updates. We also introduce Confidence-Weighted Negative Reinforcement, which operates on the principle that different mistakes carry different levels of importance. CW-NSR assigns specific penalty weights based on the model's normalized sequence likelihood. If the model is highly confident in a wrong path, it receives a larger penalty and for uncertain errors -- where the model is effectively exploring -- are penalized less strictly. Our formal analysis shows how these mechanisms govern token-level updates, allowing the model to leverage prior-guided probability redistribution while providing a natural defense against overfitting. We evaluated these methods on difficult reasoning datasets, including MATH, AIME 2025, and AMC23, using the Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B architecture.

In-context reinforcement learning (ICRL) refers to the ability of RL agents to adapt to new tasks at inference time without parameter updates by conditioning on additional context. Recent empirical studies further demonstrate that Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generation can amplify this ICRL capability. This paper is the first to provide a theoretical understanding on how CoT interacts with ICRL. We conduct our analysis in a policy evaluation setup with linear Transformer. We prove that with specific Transformer parameters, the CoT generation process is equivalent to repeatedly executing temporal difference learning updates. Additionally, we provide finite sample convergence analysis showing that the policy evaluation error decreases geometrically with CoT length and eventually saturates at a statistical floor determined by the context length. We also prove that the desired Transformer parameters are a global minimizer of the pretraining loss, providing a theoretical understanding on the empirical emergence of those parameters.

Establishing almost sure convergence rates for stochastic approximation and reinforcement learning under Markovian noise is a fundamental theoretical challenge. We make progress towards this challenge for a class of stochastic approximation algorithms whose expected updates are contractive, a setting that arises in many reinforcement learning algorithms such as $Q$-learning and linear temporal difference learning. Specifically, for a power-law learning rate $O(n^{-η})$ with $η\in (1/2, 1)$, we obtain an almost sure convergence rate arbitrarily close to $o(n^{1 - 2η})$. For a harmonic learning rate $O(n^{-1})$, we obtain an almost sure convergence rate arbitrarily close to $o(n^{-1})$, which we argue is a strong result because it is close to the optimal rate $O(n^{-1}\log\log n)$ given by the law of the iterated logarithm (for a special case of i.i.d. noise). Key to our analysis is a novel Lyapunov drift construction that applies a Poisson-equation based correction for Markovian noise to the well-established Moreau-envelope smoothing for the contractive mapping.

This paper introduces the Active-Importance-Sampling Actor-Critic (AISAC) algorithm, an extension of the Actor-Critic framework for reducing variance in policy gradient estimation. AISAC optimizes the behavior policy to minimize gradient variance while preserving unbiased gradient estimates. Using importance sampling principles, the algorithm adapts the behavior policy toward efficient data collection distributions aligned with target policy gradients. For continuous action spaces, AISAC employs Gaussian behavior policies optimized through cross-entropy minimization. We provide theoretical analysis demonstrating variance reduction and unbiasedness. Experiments on Inverted Pendulum and Half Cheetah tasks show improved learning speed, sample efficiency, and training stability compared to standard Actor-Critic methods. Results indicate that optimizing the behavior policy improves both target policy updates and critic estimation accuracy across different hyperparameter settings. AISAC accelerates convergence and stabilizes reinforcement learning training, making it promising for real-world applications. Future work includes integration with advanced algorithms such as Soft Actor-Critic and TD3 for more complex environments.

Online reinforcement learning (RL) relies on the Markov property for guaranteed performance, but real-world applications often lack well-defined states given raw observed variables. While causal RL has attracted growing interest, existing work typically assumes Markovian states are provided and focuses on using causality to accelerate learning, leaving a fundamental gap: \emph{given a longitudinal causal graph over observed variables, how does one construct MDP states that provably satisfy the Markov property?} We address this by providing a procedure that constructs a provably minimal state representation. In deep RL, we observe that the minimal representation alone empirically fails to improve performance, indicating that neural networks cannot directly exploit Markovian minimality. To address this, we propose \textbf{MOSE} (Multi-Order State Exposure), which feeds multi-order historical state constructions into the same $Q$-function. MOSE consistently outperforms both the minimal state construction and single-window policies on common benchmarks and synthetic datasets. Including the minimal representation alongside MOSE can further improve performance. Our results establish a core principle for causal deep RL: minimal sufficiency is not enough, and \emph{controlled redundancy} is necessary to unlock the benefit of causal state information.

We present the first theoretical guarantees for differentially private online reinforcement learning (RL) with general function approximation, extending beyond prior work restricted to tabular and linear settings. Our approach combines a batched policy update scheme with the exponential mechanism, together with a novel regret analysis. We show that, even under general function approximation, the regret in the model-free setting under differential privacy matches the state of the art for the linear case, scaling as $\widetilde{O}(K^{3/5})$, where $K$ denotes the number of episodes. As an important by-product, we also establish the first regret bound for online RL with batch update that depends on the standard complexity measure of coverability, complementing existing results based on a newly introduced Eluder-Condition class. In addition, we uncover fundamental gaps in recent results for private RL with linear function approximation, thereby clarifying its landscape.

Large language models have become drivers of evolutionary search, but most systems rely on a fixed, prompt-elicited policy to sample next candidates. This limits adaptation in practical engineering and research tasks, where evaluations are expensive, and progress depends on learning task-specific search dynamics. We introduce PACEvolve++, an advisor-model reinforcement learning framework for test-time policy adaptation in evolutionary search agents. PACEvolve++ decouples strategic search decisions from implementation: a trainable advisor generates, assesses, and selects hypotheses, while a stronger frontier model translates selected hypotheses into executable candidates. To train the advisor under non-stationary feedback, we propose a phase-adaptive approach that adapts its optimization strategy to different phases of the evolutionary process. Early in evolution, it uses group-relative feedback to learn broad search preferences; later, as reward gaps compress, it emphasizes best-of-$k$ frontier contribution to support stable refinement. Across expert-parallel load balancing, sequential recommendation, and protein fitness extrapolation, PACEvolve++ outperforms the state-of-the-art evolutionary search framework with frontier models, achieving faster convergence and stabilizing test-time training during evolutionary search.

Constraint inference is widely considered essential to align reinforcement learning agents with safety boundaries and operational guidelines by observing expert demonstrations. However, existing approaches typically assume homogeneous demonstrations (i.e., generated by a single expert or multiple experts with identical objectives). They also have limited ability to capture individual preferences and often suffer from computational inefficiencies. In this paper, we introduce Multi-Objective Constraint Inference (MOCI), a novel framework designed to jointly extract shared constraints and individual preferences from heterogeneous expert trajectories, where multiple experts pursue different objectives. MOCI effectively models and learns from diverse, and potentially conflicting, behaviors. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that MOCI significantly outperforms existing baselines, achieving improved predictive performance, and maintaining competitive computational efficiency on a standard grid-world benchmark. These results establish MOCI as an accurate, flexible, and computationally practical approach for real-world constraint inference and preference learning tasks.

Learning rate is a critical component of reinforcement learning (RL). This work uses global and local clocks to distinguish two types of learning rates. The former is of the standard form $α_t$ that depends only on the time step $t$ (i.e., a global clock). The latter is of the form $α_{ν(S_t, t)}$, where $ν(s, t)$ counts the number of visits to state $s$ until time $t$ (i.e., a local clock). In discounted RL, an RL algorithm that is convergent with a local clock is always also convergent with a global clock, and vice versa. We are not aware of any counterexample. The key contribution of this work is to show that this nice correspondence breaks down in average-reward RL. Specifically, we construct a counterexample showing that although differential temporal difference learning is convergent with a local clock, it can diverge with a global clock. This counterexample closes the open problem in Wan et al. [2021], Blaser et al. [2026].

We study finite-iteration behavior of asynchronous categorical distributional temporal-difference methods, covering scalar categorical TD (CTD) in the Cramér geometry and multivariate signed-categorical TD (MTD) in the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) geometry. We establish high-probability guarantees under i.i.d. sampling and under a continuing Markovian trajectory. For CTD, the Cramér sample complexity to the true return law has leading term $\tilde O(ρ_{\min}^{-1}(1-γ)^{-2}\varepsilon^{-2})$ in the i.i.d. and $\tilde O(μ_{\min}^{-1}(1-γ)^{-2}\varepsilon^{-2}+μ_{\min}^{-1}t_{\mathrm{mix}})$ in the Markovian setting, without using variance reduction or data dropping. For MTD, the MMD sample complexity has leading terms $\tilde O(ρ_{\min}^{-1}(1-γ)^{-1-c}\varepsilon^{-2})$ and $\tilde O(μ_{\min}^{-1}(1-γ)^{-1-c}\varepsilon^{-2}+μ_{\min}^{-1}t_{\mathrm{mix}})$, where $c\in(0,2)$ is the homogeneity exponent of the MMD kernel, and they reduce to the CTD rates when $c=1$. These are, to our knowledge, the first finite-iteration rates for MTD. For undiscounted fixed-horizon policy evaluation, the same analysis applies to fixed-horizon versions of CTD and MTD under i.i.d. and episodic sampling, and the rates match the discounted ones with the effective horizon $(1-γ)^{-1}$ replaced by the horizon $H$ in the leading term. Matching minimax lower bounds show that the leading terms, and the implied $1$-Wasserstein rates, are optimal under i.i.d., Markovian, and episodic sampling. Together, these results provide a unified non-asymptotic analysis of asynchronous categorical distributional TD across scalar, multivariate, discounted, and fixed-horizon settings, with rates that are minimax optimal in their leading terms.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous financial trading, a domain requiring continuous adaptation to noisy, non-stationary markets. Existing self-improving agents typically address this through unbounded free-form prompt optimization. However, in low signal-to-noise environments with delayed scalar rewards (P&L), this unstructured approach exacerbates the fundamental credit assignment problem: optimizers cannot reliably distinguish systematic logic flaws from stochastic market variance, inevitably leading to policy drift. To overcome this bottleneck, we introduce the Self-Evolving Human-Auditable Rubric Policy (SHARP), a neuro-symbolic framework that replaces unconstrained text mutation with structured, symbolic policy optimization. SHARP confines the agent's reasoning to a bounded, human-readable rubric of explicit condition-action rules. When sub-optimal trades occur, an attribution agent employs cross-sample reasoning across multiple samples to isolate specific rule failures. This enables targeted, atomic policy edits that are subsequently regularized through strict walk-forward validation. Evaluated across three diverse equity sectors and four LLM backbones, SHARP consistently transforms generic initial heuristics into highly robust strategies, lifting the empirical performance of compact models by 10 to 20 percentage points on average (e.g., GPT-4o-mini). Ultimately, SHARP demonstrates that LLMs can achieve dynamic and efficient adaptation while significantly enhancing the structural transparency and auditability demanded by institutional finance.