Text-Guided Image Editing

Instruction-guided image editors have become highly capable, yet improving them further still depends on human-edited training pairs or external reward models. Such supervision is costly to obtain and can reward plausible failures: a realistic output may leave the requested change undone or alter content that should be preserved. In this work, we strive to improve a pretrained image editor using only its own generations, without human-edited targets or an external training-time reward model. To this end, we propose a self-evolving framework, named Rubric-CEPR, that verifies the editor's own samples with its internal representations through a rubric-augmented Contrastive Edit-Preservation Reward (CEPR). A Planner proposes structured edit instructions from unlabeled images, the Editor samples multiple candidate edits, and a frozen Critic scores each candidate with decomposed rubric checks for edit realization, removal of the old state, and content preservation, using features already exposed by the editor. Non-compensatory gates reject infeasible candidates, and the best verified candidate is distilled into the editor through lightweight adapter training. On Qwen-Image-Edit, Rubric-CEPR improves ImgEdit from 4.36 to 4.60 (+5.5%), with a +24.9% gain on object isolation, and transfers to GEdit-Bench and Complex-Edit. The same procedure also improves Step1X-Edit by +7.8% on ImgEdit. We hope our approach will serve as a solid baseline for image editors that improve themselves from their own verified samples. Our code is publicly available at $\href{https://riteshthawkar.github.io/Rubric-CEPR/}{\text{this URL}}$

In text-guided image editing, describing the desired change is often straightforward, but identifying the intended object or region can be cumbersome, especially when several objects look alike. We introduce a new image editing interface that lets users place spatial marks and optional short notes directly on the image. Together, these annotations form a canvas instruction that specifies where to edit and what to change. Our editor, VibeEdit, follows these instructions to perform object addition, removal, replacement, attribute modification, and movement without a separate text prompt. We construct 1.55 million source-target edit pairs with object masks and structured edit descriptions, from which we render canvas instructions during training. We adapt Qwen-Image-Edit with layer-decoupled conditioning that separately encodes source images and canvas instructions for image editing. We train the model with region-weighted supervised fine-tuning, followed by rubric-guided reinforcement learning to improve edit completion, local edit quality, and preservation of unedited regions. We evaluate VibeEdit on an independently constructed, human-curated benchmark of 419 cases emphasizing target selection among similar objects. VibeEdit achieves a VLM rubric score of 79.9 and an outside-region PSNR of 32.8 dB, compared with 67.4 and 24.0 dB for FireRed, the highest-scoring text-instructed baseline in our evaluation.

Protective perturbations aim to stop malicious instruction-guided editing of personal photos, but they are optimized and evaluated at the editor's working resolution, whereas shared photos have 10 megapixels or more and editors first downscale them by an unknown factor. We model this resize as a frequency-selective channel. In this model, a perturbation computed at the native resolution decays with the downscaling factor and is weak even without a resize, and a perturbation computed at a fixed working resolution protects only a window of scales. The best worst-case protection over an unknown range of scales degrades only logarithmically with the width of the range, and averaging over scales does not reach it. Guided by this analysis, we propose SRIM, which samples a grid of anchor scales covering the whole range, with weights that favor the currently weakest scale, at the cost of standard expectation over transformation. On full-resolution photos of 9 to 30 megapixels and downscaling factors from 2 to 8, SRIM raises the worst-case disruption of FLUX.2-klein edits from 0.192 LPIPS, attained by the strongest published protection, to 0.463. At equal visibility, it roughly doubles the protection. The same protected photos also protect against the 9B model and against FLUX.2-dev, with worst cases of 0.450 and 0.386 against at most 0.184 for published protections, and SRIM leads on InstructPix2Pix as well.

Image editing should change only the attributes specified by an instruction while preserving everything else, yet current methods often make unintended changes. We treat this minimal-change principle as an optimization objective for instruction-based editing. Latent L1 regularization is a poor proxy for output locality in modern nonlinear generators and often requires supervision unavailable at scale. We instead optimize edit outcomes with reinforcement learning. An agentic vision-language reward model audits each source image, instruction, and edited image for two failure types: unimplemented requested changes and unintended changes. A group-level rubric merges and verifies these issues to provide consistent rewards across candidate edits without per-instruction human annotations. On FLUX.1 Kontext-dev, ARRO raises average EditScore from 5.21 to 5.88 across MinEval, MagicBrush, AnyBench, and Emu-Edit. On 600 evaluation examples, it reduces off-target pixel change by 8.4% relative to the base editor. Reward and SFT controls, blinded human evaluations, and transfer to OmniGen2 provide complementary evidence. Code: https://github.com/Showwwwwwwww/ARRO

Unified models are trained for both instruction-based image editing and text-to-image (T2I) generation, but standard editing pipelines keep source-image conditioning throughout denoising. We ask whether editing can benefit from T2I, and study how the effects of conditioning vary across edits and denoising stages. In pure editing, source attention declines for some edits over the sampling trajectory. This observation led us to task switching, which lets the model draw on its T2I capabilities. Across three unified editors and four benchmarks, switching to the T2I task for bounded intervals improves edit quality, while mean perceptual preservation remains close to pure editing across all three models. Unified editors therefore benefit from using both conditioning modes they are trained for, and the timing of the switch sets the balance between quality and preservation.

Editing a chest radiograph requires completing the requested change while preserving unrelated content. We study a latent diffusion editor with an instruction-independent source trajectory and an instruction-conditioned editing trajectory. A learned gate mixes their post-sampler candidates at each executed step, and a separate image-space mask composites the decoded proposal with the source. On 2,400 MIMIC-derived requests, 2,244 outputs met the joint target, preservation, quality, and coverage rubric (93.5%), and target completion was 97.4%. Joint validity exceeded a matched composition-only control by 1.7 percentage points (paired patient-cluster 95% interval, 0.6--2.8). At a fixed learned mask, the learned-gate proposal improved joint validity by 1.6 points (0.8--2.4); at a fixed learned proposal, the learned mask improved it by 2.6 points (1.7--3.5). Across three training seeds, mean joint validity was 93.5% with a 0.3-point sample standard deviation. A blinded 240-request assessment yielded adjudicated joint validity of 93.3% for the full editor and 91.7% for composition only. Protected-region mean absolute error decreased from 0.0190 in the raw proposal to 0.0075 after composition. These findings distinguish recurrent-gating effects on the proposal from preservation through final composition in the assessed cohort.

We introduce Scene Text Editing with Preserved Style (STEPS), a novel diffusion model architecture for quality text replacement in images. Scene Text Editing (STE), also known as Visual Text Editing, consists of changing the textual content in an image while conserving the original style, e.g. font, colors, orientation, background, etc. STEPS advances the state of the art in STE through directed focus on improved style preservation. We introduce a style encoder for visual text that captures style independently of textual content, and a model architecture that combines the style encoder with multiple semantic conditions (target text characters encoding and rendered glyphs). STEPS achieves superior results to previous STE methods in style preservation, output readability, and subjective quality.

Instruction-based image editors insert objects, restyle scenes and render new viewpoints, but it is unknown which camera they assume when they paint into a photograph. Asked to cover the floor with a checkerboard, an editor paints projective structure from which classical vanishing-point geometry reads pitch, roll, focal length, yaw and, on renders, the principal point, without any training. Unlike a calibrator such as GeoCalib, which estimates the camera of an image, this isolates the camera under which the editor paints. On 120 rendered cameras with exact ground truth, Qwen-Image-Edit-2511 paints tile edges that meet their vanishing points within 0.26 degrees, and its implicit camera matches the true one to 0.8 degrees in pitch and 6% in focal length, more accurately than GeoCalib except in roll. Asked to draw the horizon or mark a vanishing point instead, the editor fails, so this knowledge is revealed by painting and not by the explicit tasks we tried. The implicit camera has two priors: roll is pulled towards level (slope 0.71), and telephoto perspective towards a default of about 30 mm, which roughly matches the camera the models paint without any scene. For Qwen, the priors do not grow when blur removes four fifths of the line evidence. They are stronger on real photographs, and on NYUv2 a shorter wording of the task removes the difference for roll. On photographs from a 24--240 mm zoom lens the painted perspective grows with only 0.62 of the lens's slope, while GeoCalib and MoGe-2 saturate at about 52 and 42 mm. FLUX.1 Kontext and LongCat-Image-Edit are pulled much harder. Finally, from a level camera a camera-control LoRA executes pose commands at only 50--70% of their strength, and a board painted into its output agrees with the camera it produced.

Tool-based image editing (image retouching) is commonly formulated with autoregressive multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that sequentially generate reasoning, tool selections, and parameter values. In this work, we present a novel approach to tool-based image editing by framing the task as a flow matching problem. We introduce FlowTool, a framework that directly models the distribution of high-quality tool parameters conditioned on the input image and user instruction using conditional rectified flow. FlowTool combines a vision-language model backbone for multimodal understanding with a Diffusion Transformer parameter generator that transforms Gaussian noise into an editing plan. We train FlowTool with a two-stage supervised flow-matching curriculum, followed by reward-based post-training. Across MMArt-Bench, FlowTool-Eval, ArtEdit-Bench, and MIT-Adobe5K, FlowTool achieves significantly stronger reference-based performance than specialized MLLM editing agents and proprietary MLLMs, while remaining competitive with proprietary models under reference-free evaluation. Moreover, FlowTool significantly improves inference efficiency, reducing latency by at least $50\times$ while requiring nearly $2\times$ less memory than the compared baselines. These results demonstrate that tool-based image editing can be effectively modeled as conditional generation over structured continuous editing parameters, without autoregressive reasoning.

Instruction-based image editing has achieved strong performance in single-turn settings, yet practical editing is often iterative, with each instruction applied to the output of the previous turn. We find that existing editing models degrade rapidly under recursive editing and attribute this failure to a train-test mismatch in the conditioning distribution: models are trained on clean source images but must repeatedly condition on their own imperfect outputs at inference time. To address this, we propose MT-OPSD, an on-policy self-distillation framework that trains the model on self-generated conditioning states with editing supervision from a clean-conditioned teacher, without requiring multi-turn annotations. We further introduce LME-Bench, a benchmark of 100 ten-turn editing sessions for evaluating long-horizon robustness. Experiments across three editing backbones show that MT-OPSD substantially improves long-horizon editing success and reduces multi-turn collapse while largely preserving single-turn editing quality.

Instruction-guided image editing should change what the instruction names and leave the rest of the image untouched. In dual classifier-free guidance (CFG), an editor combines two directions at every denoising step, one that pushes toward the instructed edit and one that pulls back toward the source image, using global weights. We introduce Attention-Scoped Guidance (ASG), a sampler wrapper that makes these weights spatial. It reads a soft support map from the instruction attention that the editor already computes, then weakens text guidance where support is low and strengthens image anchoring where support is high. The wrapper requires no training, no external mask, and no additional network evaluation. On the full MagicBrush and PIE-Bench++ splits, ASG improves preservation-oriented metrics, leading three of four MagicBrush metrics and PIE-Bench++ background PSNR. A dose-matched control that removes the spatial placement loses up to 0.73 CLIP on PIE-Bench++, confirming that the spatial allocation itself carries the gain.

Flow-based image editing (FlowEdit) enables inversion-free semantic changes through the difference between source and target velocities. In this paper, we observe that FlowEdit's default classifier-free guidance (CFG) configuration, with asymmetric source and target scales, causes substantial background leakage. Matching these guidance scales, for example by removing CFG, improves edit-relevant localization but severely degrades editability. To get the best of both worlds, we propose DecFlowEdit, which decouples the optimal guidance scales for localization and for editing in flow-based generative models. In particular, DecFlowEdit first extracts an edit-relevant prior by temporally aggregating velocity differences evaluated without CFG, and then uses this prior to reweight the original updates under default CFG. Our method remains training-free and inversion-free, requiring neither external spatial masks nor attention manipulation. Experiments on PIE-Bench across FLUX, SD3, and SD3.5 show that DecFlowEdit improves background preservation, reducing structure distance by approximately 61 to 73 percent and background LPIPS by 68 to 80 percent relative to FlowEdit at comparable editing fidelity.

Text-guided image editing aims to perform a desired edit while preserving source content unrelated to it. Pretrained rectified-flow models enable training-free editing of real images through modifications to their sampling trajectories. However, responses at locations unrelated to the desired edit can still accumulate along the editing trajectory and become visible in the final result. To overcome this, we propose Constrained Edit Fields (CEF), which assigns each spatial location a continuous edit responsibility that quantifies its relevance to the desired edit. CEF estimates edit responsibility directly from the source image when the relevant content is present. For edits whose target content is absent from the source, CEF first generates an unconstrained proposal to reveal its realized spatial support and then estimates responsibility from that proposal. At each editing step, CEF decomposes the base edit field into prompt-induced and trajectory-induced components, enabling edit responsibility to preserve instruction-relevant updates while suppressing unintended trajectory-induced changes. Evaluated on all 700 PIE-Bench examples, CEF achieves state-of-the-art Structure Distance, background LPIPS, and background MSE with both Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium and FLUX, while retaining competitive instruction alignment. On Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium, it reduces these metrics over the previous best results by 10.2%, 21.2%, and 48.0%, respectively.

Multimodal foundation models edit natural photographs at production quality, yet the same models struggle with structured visual content such as infographics. Unlike photographs, infographics encode information through logical relations; editing one element often requires surrounding elements to be adapted. We refer to this global layout reasoning capability as reflow. Existing image-editing benchmarks neither provide a dedicated setting for structured visual content nor evaluate the reflow capability. We introduce InfoEdit, a novel benchmark of 1,000 infographics across eight logical-relation families, paired with 4,000 editing instructions across four editing tasks, and a reflow-aware evaluation protocol. Across eight frontier editors, only GPT-Image-2 clears 60% average success rate; most models fall below 7%, and no editor exceeds 36% on the Swap-Block task even with perfect target localization. We further show that code-level editing can match the strongest pixel-level editor, revealing complementary strengths across tasks. InfoEdit identifies reflow as a central challenge in structured visual content editing and provides a diagnostic benchmark to facilitate future progress.

Professional design requires any-color control: the ability to specify an object's target color with any 24-bit hex value for image generation and editing. Prior work has explored color generation, editing, and colorization, but often relies on dedicated color representations or specialized inference procedures. Advances in large language models offer a simpler starting point: even compact models can associate hex values with color semantics. We present Paint-Anything, which learns a shared hex-prompt interface for generation and editing through object-level color supervision. We develop a data pipeline that constructs Paint-500K from real images through object grounding, perceptual color labeling, and editing-pair synthesis. Since shadows make real-image labels only approximate colors, we complement this supervision with pure-color anchors whose pixels exactly match their paired hex values. These anchors are used only at high-noise timesteps, leaving low-noise training to natural images. We further introduce Any Color Benchmark (ACBench), comprising ACBench-T2I and ACBench-Edit, to measure object-level hex color fidelity across both tasks. On FLUX.2-4B, Paint-Anything improves ACBench-T2I and ACBench-Edit scores by 85.3% and 28.3%, respectively, relative to the base model, with ablations supporting the training recipe. It also achieves the highest average CompColor score among the compared methods.

Text-guided image editing must introduce the requested changes while preserving unrelated source content. In training-free editing, diffusion editors often use spatial controls whose inaccuracies can leave edits incomplete or alter unrelated regions. Causal autoregressive editors face a further constraint: their fixed decoding order limits revision of earlier decisions. As the first to explore training-free image editing with Generative Refinement Networks (GRN), we observe that its refinement process is inherently suitable for editing and offers a promising way to address these limitations. Motivated by this observation, we introduce RefineEdit, a training-free prompt-to-prompt image editing framework built on the GRN. Our key idea is to couple edit localization with content generation through the global refinement of binary image codes, allowing editing evidence to be revised as the image evolves. More specifically, RefineEdit combines bit routing with two stabilization mechanisms: adaptive spatial freezing and finite bit locking. Bit routing starts from an intermediate source state and uses signed probability differences between the two branches to identify editable positions and bits. It directs selected bits toward editing refinement while anchoring the rest to the evolving source trajectory. Adaptive spatial freezing limits unnecessary expansion of the editing region, while finite bit locking maintains recent bit activations to support continued editing. The overall framework requires no additional training, external masks, or attention control. Across nine editing categories of PIE-Bench, RefineEdit achieves the best background-preservation scores in PSNR, LPIPS, MSE, and SSIM, together with the highest whole-image and edited-region CLIP scores among the evaluated methods. Code is available at https://github.com/mura1n/RefineEdit.

Instruction-guided image editing has a training-time blind spot. Generative editors are never required to semantically verify whether their outputs actually satisfy the instruction. Supervision stops at reconstruction and input textual-level conditioning. This produces incomplete edits, spatial spillover, and poor localization. We present IABEdit, a model-agnostic framework that embeds differentiable semantic verification into training. A frozen vision-language model extracts spatially-aware descriptors from the ground-truth edit. A trainable aligner then reproduces them from the generated output. The residual between the two becomes a gradient that teaches the generator both what to edit and where, with no inference-time VLM cost. IABEdit is compatible with diverse backbones, including U-Net (Stable Diffusion) and MMDiT (FLUX), without altering their inference pipelines. On MagicBrush, it improves structural fidelity by +3.49 DINO-I over the best diffusion baseline and +1.26 over the best overall baseline, while remaining competitive on instruction alignment. It also achieves state-of-the-art instruction adherence performance on RealEdit and EMU Edit benchmarks based on embedding-based metrics. Most consequentially, on the D-LORD surveillance benchmark, it surpasses the proprietary Gemini agent by +5.13 DINO-P under heavy occlusion, where preserving identity is hardest. This shows that gradient-aligned VLM distillation holds up under real-world-like surveillance and occlusion conditions. Human and GPT-4o evaluations confirm perceptually precise, well-localized edits.

Emotion-driven image editing aims to evoke a specified target emotion by modifying emotion-relevant visual cues in a source image, while preserving the overall composition and semantic-structural coherence of the original scene. Existing scene-level editors typically specify the target with a single emotion category and often learn visual transformations from operation-level text instructions. A category collapses a mixed affective endpoint into one dominant label, while language cannot precisely quantify how coexisting emotions should increase, decrease, or remain stable. We introduce AffectDelta, a source-aware editor that treats editing as a transition between eight-dimensional emotion distributions. A frozen Emotion Distribution Predictor estimates the source state, and the signed source-to-target difference encodes the direction and magnitude of the requested transition. Within AffectDelta, an internal transition encoder and a source-aware diffusion backbone jointly translate this signal into context-dependent semantic and appearance changes. To train this formulation, we construct AffectPair-249K, comprising 248,841 source-target pairs with predicted eight-dimensional distributions and spanning both cross-category and within-category transitions. Experiments against six baselines, combining quantitative evaluation with qualitative comparisons, demonstrate improved affective alignment and content preservation, while ablations validate our design choices. Code and dataset will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown substantial potential in visual understanding and graphic code generation, editing scientific figures through code presents a greater challenge: a model must jointly recover visual structure, ground the requested change, generate compilable code, and preserve all unrelated content. While existing TikZ benchmarks mainly focus on figure reconstruction and generation, few systematically evaluate instruction-guided scientific figure editing with compilable code. We introduce Edit2TikZ, a comprehensive benchmark for scientific figure editing tasks, featuring 1,548 diverse and high-quality samples. Edit2TikZ combines real-world and controlled synthetic edit cases, supports both textual and visual localization request, and contains multi-step editing, each with step-level annotations. We further construct a human-aligned evaluation framework to measure whether a requested edit is completed while irrelevant content is preserved. Utilizing Edit2TikZ, we evaluate 14 mainstream MLLMs and find that current systems remain unreliable: on average, proprietary models achieve a compilation success rate of merely 75% and remain limited in both figure restoration and edit correctness, while compact models below 9B struggle further with instruction following and complete figure generation. Therefore, we build a mixed training set TikZEditMix and adopt reconstruction-then-editing curriculum learning for compact models. On Qwen3.5-4B, this training improves the compilation success rate from 45.35% to 83.40% and yields an average improvement of 18.7 points across our proposed evaluation metrics. The code and data will be released at https://github.com/Solunny/Edit2TikZ.

Text-guided diffusion image editing aims to modify semantic attributes of an image while preserving its identity, layout, and background. However, naïvely switching the text condition during sampling often causes global drift, as denoising dynamics propagate changes across tokens and can disrupt unedited regions. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{A}synchronous \textbf{T}oken \textbf{D}ecoding \textbf{Edit} (ATDEdit), an inference-time framework that views each sampler step as a parallel update of a globally coupled token matrix and enables token-indexed condition switching with differentiated update policies. Instead of applying synchronous target-conditioned updates to all tokens, ATDEdit estimates editable locations using token-wise conditional surprisal and applies target-conditioned corrections to the selected token set. It supplies source key/value memory at keep-token positions and projects selected keep-token latent rows back to their source values; these operations promote background preservation but do not constitute a pixel-level invariance guarantee. This approach combines local editing and background preservation without external or user-provided spatial masks and without model fine-tuning. On PIE-Bench, ATDEdit achieves the strongest reported preservation metrics, including 27.44~dB PSNR and 0.055 LPIPS, while retaining competitive semantic alignment.

Despite rapid advances in generative models, achieving pixel-level precision in sketch-based image editing remains a persistent challenge, particularly for fine-grained local deformations. This gap stems primarily from the critical shortage of high-quality, publicly available benchmark datasets that jointly provide geometric constraints and semantic instructions. To address this issue, we first introduce SI-Data, a high-quality dataset specifically designed for instruction-guided local sketch editing. We develop an automated pipeline leveraging Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to synthesize comprehensive quadruplets comprising original images, local geometric sketches, semantic instructions, and corresponding edited images. By providing both reliable spatial anchors and explicit semantic intent, SI-Data uniquely enables collaborative spatial-semantic learning. Building upon this, we propose a collaborative framework called SI-Edit that integrates semantic instructions with precise geometric constraints. Furthermore, to address the lack of standardized evaluation, we establish a comprehensive set of metrics designed to measure both structural fidelity (e.g., sketch-to-edge alignment) and semantic adherence. Experimental results demonstrate that SI-Edit provides more reliable structural control than baselines for sketch-based image editing, and achieves precise, pixel-level local refinements aligned with user intent. The data and code are released on the project page.

Next-scale visual autoregressive models (VARs) have emerged as a powerful generative paradigm, producing high-quality images through efficient coarse-to-fine prediction. However, their potential for text-guided image editing remains largely underexplored. Existing training-free VAR editing approaches often formulate editing as target-conditioned regeneration guided or constrained by the source image, and may rely on inversion, test-time optimization, attention control, or user-provided masks. This generation-centric formulation does not fully exploit the multiscale source representations provided by VARs and may introduce additional computation or intervention. We instead take a source-centric perspective on VAR editing, in which the encoded source image tokens serve as the primary visual state and the editing process focuses on condition-induced changes. Based on this perspective, we propose \textbf{EditMod}, which compares source- and target-conditioned predictions under a shared autoregressive context, treats their difference as a scale-wise editing direction, and applies it as a residual update to source tokens at selected scales. Experiments show that EditMod achieves leading source-image fidelity while maintaining strong text alignment, and completes end-to-end editing of a 1K image in only 1.57 seconds on a single A100 GPU without per-image preparation.

Regional image editing has attracted considerable attention for its spatial controllability. Although instruction-based and mask-based editing methods can achieve strong semantic alignment, reliable regional control remains challenging, where an edit must be accurately localized and naturally integrated with the preserved context. We propose MaskFlow, a training framework for precise localization, consistent background preservation, and seamless boundary transitions. MaskFlow incorporates the mask into the probability path and flow-matching objective, coordinating generation within the editable region with source preservation outside it. The proposed Soft-Poisson De-seaming module further refines the predicted vector field during both training and sampling to improve the smooth integration of the edited foreground with the preserved background. We also introduce MaskEdit-Benchmark for general scene and infographics editing, where prompts describe the desired edits without localization cues, leaving masks to specify the target regions. Experiments on natural scenes and infographic images demonstrate consistent improvements over competing methods in both quantitative and qualitative evaluations. Project page: https://reychiaro.github.io/MaskFlow

Ask a commercial image editor to preview a cosmetic procedure and it will often change more of the face than the request names: a nose edit can also smooth skin or alter lighting. Existing methods for confining an edit to one region require access to the model's internals, which a public editing API does not expose. We ask how much control is possible from the client side alone. In a pilot benchmark, six commercial editing configurations and one mask-based inpainting model perform facelift-style jaw-neck and rhinoplasty edits at three levels of client-side control: the prompt alone; cutting the edited region out of the response and pasting it back onto the original photograph through a landmark-derived mask (a masked composite); and asking the model itself to inpaint inside the mask where supported. Of 210 attempted edits, 196 could be scored. ArcFace cosine measures identity preservation; a CIELAB pixel-change ratio measures how much change lands inside the requested region rather than a protected facial zone. On the 12 frontal faces the regional metric could score, the masked composite improved localization over the paired prompt-only output by a median of 0.446 (95% face-clustered bootstrap interval 0.421-0.457) while changing the requested region about as much. Editors differed in edit strength versus identity retention, and the one inpainting model we tested did not beat the simple composite. Against each face's input-to-postoperative baseline, no editor moved its outputs closer to the postoperative photograph in identity-embedding terms. This is a study of control, not clinical accuracy: no surgeons rated the outputs, and each condition was generated once. Within that scope, keeping a surgical preview inside its intended region needs no access to the model; a mask and composite on the client enforce it across every editor tested, at low provider cost.

Recent advances in unified multimodal models have significantly improved text-guided image editing abilities. In particular, models such as Nano-Banana-Pro and GPT-Image-2 demonstrate emerging capabilities in multi-source image editing (MIE), including tasks such as object synthesis, person-background composition, and cross-image style fusion. However, existing benchmarks and image editing assessment (IEQA) methods remain primarily focused on single-image editing tasks and largely overlook the more challenging setting of MIE. This highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive and human-aligned benchmark for MIE. To this end, we introduce MIE-Bench, the first large-scale multiple image editing benchmark with fine-grained human preference annotations. Specifically, MIE-Bench includes 3,000 editing instances across 16 tasks, each involving more than two source images and an editing prompt, together with 36K edited images produced by 12 state-of-the-art editing models and over 108K mean opinion scores (MOSs) covering visual quality, instruction following, and attribute preservation. Based on MIE-Bench, we propose MIEScore, a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based evaluation model enhanced with skill optimization and multi-dimensional supervised fine-tuning, to provide human-aligned feedback for MIE. Extensive experiments show that MIEScore achieves state-of-the-art performance in aligning with human preferences and generalizes well across other IEQA datasets. Both the dataset and the model are available at https://github.com/IntMeGroup/MIEScore.

Can image-editing models discover visual rules in image space and complete problem-solving end-to-end? We tackle this question in the spirit of a human worksheet test (e.g., an IQ test), using problems that require models to read image-based instructions, recognize the problem, infer the answer, bind it to the correct destination, control output count, suppress unnecessary edits, and preserve the input and format. We introduce WISRD, a Worksheet Image-Space Rule Discovery benchmark with 11 core tasks under eight information conditions, spanning localized marking, filling, copying, counting, and no-edit suppression, together with four supplementary reasoning-stress probes for multi-step spatial manipulation, abstract pattern reasoning, logical inference, and constraint-based problem solving. We identify three key findings as follows. (i) Among the frontier image-editing models evaluated, Nano Banana Pro achieves the highest score. On the shared V0--V3 no-reference subset, the Auto-Strict proxy pass rates are 48.7% for Nano Banana Pro, 13.4% for Qwen-Image-Edit, 11.5% for FLUX.2 Klein 4B API, 11.3% for FLUX.2 Klein 4B open-weight, and 0.0% for InstructPix2Pix. (ii) Analysis reveals that current image-editing models can partially rely on rendered in-image instructions even when the external prompt is absent or merely generic. (iii) In small supplementary diagnostics, Nano Banana Pro achieves 70.0% on 4-by-4 Sudoku and 22.9% on public RAVEN pattern-discovery items in image space.

Instruction-based Image Editing (IIE) aims to transform a given image into a new one based on textual instructions. Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have accelerated progress toward practical ``one-sentence image editing" systems. This survey presents a systematic taxonomy and comprehensive review of IIE research, structured around five core dimensions: (1) task definition and hierarchical categorization of editing operations, (2) methodologies for training data construction, (3) architectural evolution from GAN-based to diffusion and autoregressive paradigms, (4) standardized evaluation metrics and benchmark development, and (5) introduction of commercial solutions. Our analysis shows critical technological milestones across model generations. We further propose a Comprehensive, in-Depth, and Diagnostic benchmark for IIE task (CDD-IIE Bench), which can rigorously assess the multiple aspects of model performance. Through empirical comparisons of open-source solutions, we highlight their respective capabilities and limitations. Finally, we discuss future research directions to advance the field.

Emotional image editing requires more than applying affective filters or modifying predefined visual factors: an effective edit must identify what a particular image can afford for a target emotion. Existing affective image manipulation methods, including recent agentic variants, largely operate within bounded strategy spaces based on predefined factor taxonomies, knowledge libraries, or conventional editing templates, and therefore often miss image-specific, context-grounded strategies. We introduce EmoScope, a multi-agent framework that reframes the task from "how should I edit?" to "what can I edit?" EmoScope first discovers an image-specific editable space through emotion-conditioned affordance reasoning, then uses a semantic hierarchy of anchors, variables, and context to balance content consistency and emotional expressiveness before executing and verifying the edit. Because its plans are expressed as image-specific affordances rather than retrieved templates, EmoScope also exposes the editing strategy as an interactive surface for user refinement at the plan level. In a large-scale human evaluation covering all eight Mikels emotion categories, with 4,693 valid responses across 1,824 pairwise questions, participants preferred EmoScope over two competitive baselines by 88.1% on average. Attribution analysis further shows that EmoScope selects target-emotion-adaptive strategies rather than applying a uniform template. The same affordance-level plan also supports lightweight user refinement in an interactive pilot. Finally, we show that classifier-based metrics exhibit emotion-conditional blind spots toward non-stereotypical, context-grounded edits, and present a relative content-emotion preference-affinity landscape showing that EmoScope's advantage varies systematically across image-emotion combinations.

Replacing an object with one that differs in category or shape requires complete source removal, natural target formation unconstrained by the source silhouette, and preservation of unrelated content. Existing training-free editors either localize edits from terminal predictions under source and target prompts or preserve unrelated content through spatially unselective source-feature reuse without explicit region discovery. Before reaching the terminal predictions, prompt-induced semantic differences undergo additional network transformations that may obscure their spatial localization, reducing localization precision. Spatially unselective feature reuse forces a trade-off between edit completeness and background preservation. Therefore, we propose PC-Edit, a prompt-contrastive framework for training-free MM-DiT editing. PC-Edit contrasts the image-token attention outputs under the source and target prompts, capturing prompt-induced semantic differences directly where text-conditioned information is delivered to image tokens. The same contrast identifies a source-erasure region during inversion and a target-emergence region during denoising. Their union suppresses source remnants while allowing the target object to form naturally. PC-Edit further couples region discovery and background preservation within each sampling step by estimating the current edit region from preceding attention blocks and immediately injecting cached source K/V features outside it in subsequent blocks, thereby protecting unrelated content before the latent update. Experiments on PIE-Bench and our EditRegion-Bench, with human-verified edit-region annotations for single- and multi-object addition and replacement, show that PC-Edit achieves the best editing quality and background preservation among methods without user-specified edit regions.

Recent one-step text-to-image (T2I) models enable efficient image synthesis and provide new opportunities for real-time image editing. However, existing one-step editing methods primarily rely on text conditioning for semantic transformation, lacking explicit spatial control over \textit{where} to edit. More importantly, even when spatial constraints are introduced, these methods often struggle to achieve strong and stable semantic modifications within the target regions. In this work, we revisit one-step image editing from a spatially controlled perspective and identify two key challenges: discovering editable regions and achieving effective localized semantic transformation. We reveal that existing methods perform global semantic transport, which limits high-intensity local editing under the one-step setting. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{WhereEdit}, a framework that reformulates one-step editing as localized adaptive editing. WhereEdit automatically identifies semantically relevant regions from internal model features and applies adaptive local modulation to enhance target-region editing while preserving non-target areas and structural consistency. Experiments on the PIE-Bench benchmark demonstrate that WhereEdit consistently outperforms existing one-step image editing methods, achieving superior editing quality while maintaining the efficiency of one-step generation. Additional experiments with region-level supervision further highlight the importance of explicit spatial reasoning for high-quality one-step image editing.