Video Generation Evaluation
Overview
The field measures whether generated videos look good and, crucially, whether they follow prompts and depict coherent events over time. It combines perceptual metrics such as FVD and human preference ratings with benchmarks for motion, physics, geometry, long-form continuity, and audio-video alignment. Recent approaches use task-specific rubrics, vision-language model judges, and interpretable diagnostics to assess failures that aggregate scores can hide. A central challenge is that automated evaluators may disagree with people, while visual realism often fails to reflect physical reasoning, causal consistency, or successful task completion.
Latest papers
192 papers34 papers in the last four weeks, up 113% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.
Comparison Drives Preference: Reference-Aware Modeling for AI-Generated Video Quality Assessment
AnimationBench: Are Video Models Good at Character-Centric Animation?
How to Correctly Make Mistakes: A Framework for Constructing and Benchmarking Mistake Aware Egocentric Procedural Videos
Prompt-to-Gesture: Measuring the Capabilities of Image-to-Video Deictic Gesture Generation
ANVIL: Analogies and Videos for Lecturers
DPC-VQA: Decoupling Quality Perception and Residual Calibration for Video Quality Assessment
GTASA: Ground Truth Annotations for Spatiotemporal Analysis, Evaluation and Training of Video Models
VGA-Bench: A Unified Benchmark and Multi-Model Framework for Video Aesthetics and Generation Quality Evaluation
LPM 1.0: Video-based Character Performance Model
Generative World Renderer
SLVMEval: Synthetic Meta Evaluation Benchmark for Text-to-Long Video Generation
ViGoR-Bench: How Far Are Visual Generative Models From Zero-Shot Visual Reasoners?
performance mirage'' that overlooks the generative process. To address this, we introduce ViGoR Vision-G}nerative Reasoning-centric Benchmark), a unified framework designed to dismantle this mirage. ViGoR distinguishes itself through four key innovations: 1) holistic cross-modal coverage bridging Image-to-Image and Video tasks; 2) a dual-track mechanism evaluating both intermediate processes and final results; 3) an evidence-grounded automated judge ensuring high human alignment; and 4) granular diagnostic analysis that decomposes performance into fine-grained cognitive dimensions. Experiments on over 20 leading models reveal that even state-of-the-art systems harbor significant reasoning deficits, establishing ViGoR as a critical stress test'' for the next generation of intelligent vision models. The demo have been available at https://vincenthancoder.github.io/ViGoR-Bench/