VLM Evaluation

VLM: Vision-Language Model

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Momentum

70 papers in the last four weeks, up 67% on the four weeks before. 0.7% of all new papers.

Jul 13Week of Sep 28

Latest papers 649

Apr 30, 2026cs.AI

The Effects of Visual Priming on Cooperative Behavior in Vision-Language Models

As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) become increasingly integrated into decision-making systems, it is essential to understand how visual inputs influence their behavior. This paper investigates the effects of visual priming on VLMs' cooperative behavior using the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) as a test scenario. We examine whether exposure to images depicting behavioral concepts (kindness/helpfulness vs. aggressiveness/selfishness) and color-coded reward matrices alters VLM decision patterns. Experiments were conducted across multiple state-of-the-art VLMs. We further explore mitigation strategies including prompt modifications, Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning, and visual token reduction. Results show that VLM behavior can be influenced by both image content and color cues, with varying susceptibility and mitigation effectiveness across models. These findings not only underscore the importance of robust evaluation frameworks for VLM deployment in visually rich and safety-critical environments, but also highlight how architectural and training differences among models may lead to distinct behavioral responses-an area worthy of further investigation.

Kenneth J. K. Ong

1ST Engineering, Singapore.

VLM Evaluation VLM Robustness Vision-Language Models

Apr 30, 2026cs.AI

Auditing Frontier Vision-Language Models for Trustworthy Medical VQA: Grounding Failures, Format Collapse, and Domain Adaptation

Deploying vision-language models (VLMs) in clinical settings demands auditable behavior under realistic failure conditions, yet the failure landscape of frontier VLMs on specialized medical inputs is poorly characterized. We audit five recent frontier and grounding-aware VLMs (Gemini~~2.5~~Pro, GPT-5, o3, GLM-4.5V, Qwen~~2.5~~VL) on Medical VQA along two trust-relevant axes. Perception: all models localize anatomical and pathological targets poorly -- the best model reaches only 0.23 mean IoU and 19.1% [email protected] -- and exhibit clinically dangerous laterality confusion. Pipeline integration: a self-grounding pipeline, where the same model localizes then answers, degrades VQA accuracy for every model -- driven by both inaccurate localization and format-compliance failures under the two-step prompt (parse failure rises to 70%--99% for Gemini and GPT-5 on VQA-RAD). Replacing predicted boxes with ground-truth annotations recovers and improves VQA accuracy, consistent with the failure residing in the perception module rather than in the decomposition itself. These observational findings identify grounding quality as a primary trustworthiness bottleneck in our SLAKE bounding-box setting. As a complementary fine-tuning follow-up, supervised fine-tuning of Qwen~~2.5~~VL on combined Med-VQA training data attains the highest reported SLAKE open-ended recall (85.5%) among comparable methods, suggesting that the VQA-level gap is tractable with domain adaptation; whether this also closes the perception/trustworthiness bottleneck is left to future work.

Xupeng Chen, Binbin Shi, Chenqian Le +5

New York University, New York, USA · Tsinghua University, Beijing, China · Columbia University, New York, USA +1

VLM Evaluation Healthcare Medical VQA Medical VLMs Medical Image Grounding

Apr 30, 2026cs.AI

WaferSAGE: Large Language Model-Powered Wafer Defect Analysis via Synthetic Data Generation and Rubric-Guided Reinforcement Learning

We present WaferSAGE, a framework for wafer defect visual question answering using small vision-language models. To address data scarcity in semiconductor manufacturing, we propose a three-stage synthesis pipeline incorporating structured rubric generation for precise evaluation. Starting from limited labeled wafer maps, we employ clustering-based cleaning to filter label noise, then generate comprehensive defect descriptions using vision-language models, which are converted into structured evaluation rubrics criteria. These rubrics guide the synthesis of VQA pairs, ensuring coverage across defect type identification, spatial distribution, morphology, and root cause analysis. Our dual assessment framework aligns rule-based metrics with LLM-Judge scores via Bayesian optimization, enabling reliable automated evaluation. Through curriculum-based reinforcement learning with Group Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) and rubric-aligned rewards, our 4B-parameter Qwen3-VL model achieves a 6.493 LLM-Judge score, closely approaching Gemini-3-Flash (7.149) while enabling complete on-premise deployment. We demonstrate that small models with domain-specific training can surpass proprietary large models in specialized industrial visual understanding, offering a viable path for privacy-preserving, cost-effective deployment in semiconductor manufacturing.

Ke Xu, Zhongyuan Lian

Shanghai Huahong Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, Shanghai, 201203, China · Dept. of Automation, School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China

VLM Evaluation Visual Question Answering Semiconductor Manufacturing Synthetic Data Generation Industrial Anomaly Detection RL for VLMs

Apr 30, 2026cs.CV

Revealing the Impact of Visual Text Style on Attribute-based Descriptions Produced by Large Visual Language Models

When the visual style of text is considered, a wide variety can be observed in font, color, and size. However, when a word is read, its meaning is independent of the style in which it has been written or rendered. In this paper, we investigate whether, and how, the style in which a word is visualized in an image impacts the description that a Large Visual Language Model (LVLM) provides for the concept to which that word refers. Specifically, we investigate how functional text styles (readability-oriented, e.g., black sans-serif) versus decorative styles (display-oriented, e.g., colored cursive/script) affect LVLMs' descriptions of a concept in terms of the attributes of that concept. Our experiments study the situation in which the LVLM is able to correctly identify the concept referred to by a visual text, i.e., by a word or words rendered as an image, and in which the visual text style should not influence the attribute-based description that the LVLM produces. Our experimental results reveal that even when the concept is correctly identified, text style influences the model's attribute-based descriptions of the concept. Our findings demonstrate non-trivial style leakage from text style into semantic inference and motivate style-aware evaluation and mitigation for LVLM-based multimedia systems.

Xiaomeng Wang, Martha Larson, Zhengyu Zhao

Radboud University · Nijmegen, Netherlands · Xi’an Jiaotong University +1

VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Models Large Vision-Language Models Document Image Understanding Text Generation

Apr 28, 2026cs.HC

Beyond Screenshots: Evaluating VLMs' Understanding of UI Animations

AI agents operating on user interfaces must understand how interfaces communicate state and feedback to act reliably. As a core communicative modality, animations are increasingly used in modern interfaces, serving critical functional purposes beyond mere aesthetics. Thus, understanding UI animation is essential for comprehensive interface interpretation. However, recent studies of Vision Language Models (VLMs) for UI understanding have focused primarily on static screenshots, leaving it unclear how well these models handle dynamic UI animations. To address this gap, we created AniMINT, a novel dataset of 300 densely annotated UI animation videos. We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs on UI animation understanding, including their abilities to perceive the animation effects, identify animation purposes, and interpret animation meaning. Our results show that VLMs can reliably detect primitive motion. However, their high-level animation interpretation remains inconsistent, with substantial gaps relative to human performance. Finally, we use Motion, Context, and Perceptual Cues (MCPC) to probe factors affecting VLM performance, revealing key bottlenecks and directions for future improvement.

Chen Liang, Xirui Jiang, Naihao Deng +2

University of Michigan

VLM Evaluation Video Understanding Temporal Video Understanding

Apr 28, 2026quant-ph

QCalEval: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Quantum Calibration Plot Understanding

Quantum computing calibration depends on interpreting experimental data, and calibration plots provide the most universal human-readable representation for this task, yet no systematic evaluation exists of how well vision-language models (VLMs) interpret them. We introduce QCalEval, the first VLM benchmark for quantum calibration plots: 243 samples across 87 scenario types from 22 experiment families, spanning superconducting qubits and neutral atoms, evaluated on six question types in both zero-shot and in-context learning settings. The best general-purpose zero-shot model reaches a mean score of 72.3, and many open-weight models degrade under multi-image in-context learning, whereas frontier closed models improve substantially. A supervised fine-tuning ablation at the 9-billion-parameter scale shows that SFT improves zero-shot performance but cannot close the multimodal in-context learning gap. As a reference case study, we release NVIDIA Ising Calibration 1, an open-weight model based on Qwen3.5-35B-A3B that reaches 74.7 zero-shot average score.

Shuxiang Cao, Zijian Zhang, Abhishek Agarwal +29

1NVIDIA · University of Toronto · 13Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence +10

VLM Evaluation In-Context Learning

Apr 28, 2026cs.LG

VLM Judges Can Rank but Cannot Score: Task-Dependent Uncertainty in Multimodal Evaluation

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used as automated judges for multimodal systems, yet their scores provide no indication of reliability. We study this problem through conformal prediction, a distribution-free framework that converts a judge's point score into a calibrated prediction interval using only score-token log-probabilities, with no retraining. We present the first systematic analysis of conformal prediction for VLM-as-a-Judge across 3 judges and 14 visual task categories. Our results show that evaluation uncertainty is strongly task-dependent: intervals cover ~40% of the score range for aesthetics and natural images but expand to ~70% for chart and mathematical reasoning, yielding a quantitative reliability map for multimodal evaluation. We further identify a failure mode not captured by standard evaluation metrics, ranking-scoring decoupling, where judges achieve high ranking correlation while producing wide, uninformative intervals, correctly ordering responses but failing to assign reliable absolute scores. Finally, we show that interval width is driven primarily by task difficulty and annotation quality, i.e., the same judge and method yield 4.5x narrower intervals on a clean, multi-annotator captioning benchmark. Code: https://github.com/divake/VLM-Judge-Uncertainty

Divake Kumar, Sina Tayebati, Devashri Naik +2

University of Illinois at Chicago · 2AI Labs at Capital One

VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Models LLM-as-a-Judge Conformal Prediction Vision-Language Model-as-a-Judge Multimodal Model Evaluation

Apr 28, 2026cs.CV

DRAGON: A Benchmark for Evidence-Grounded Visual Reasoning over Diagrams

Diagram question answering (DQA) requires models to interpret structured visual representations such as charts, maps, infographics, circuit schematics, and scientific diagrams. Recent vision-language models (VLMs) often achieve high answer accuracy on these tasks, yet correct answers do not guarantee that models ground their reasoning in the diagram regions that support the prediction. Models may instead rely on textual correlations or dataset artifacts without identifying the visual evidence required to verify the answer. This limitation prevents reliable evaluation of diagram reasoning and reduces interpretability. We introduce DRAGON, a benchmark for evaluating evidence-grounded visual reasoning in diagrams. Given a diagram, a question, and the correct answer, a model must predict bounding boxes that correspond to the visual elements required to justify the answer. These evidence regions may include answer-bearing components, textual labels, legends, axes, connectors, and other supporting structures involved in the reasoning process. The DRAGON dataset contains 11,664 annotated question instances from six diagram QA datasets: ChartQA, Circuit-VQA, InfographicsVQA, MapIQ, MapWise, and AI2D, with a 2,445-instance test set carrying human-verified evidence annotations and a standardized evaluation framework. Our evaluation on recent VLMs reveals that even Claude Opus 4.6 achieves a Grounding IoU of only 23.8% on AI2D, showing that faithful visual grounding remains an open challenge. DRAGON supports future research on models that ground their predictions in visual evidence.

Anirudh Iyengar Kaniyar Narayana Iyengar, Tampu Ravi Kumar, Gaurav Najpande +4

Arizona State University · Adobe Research · University of Maryland

VLM Evaluation Visual Reasoning Chart QA Question Answering Visually Grounded Reasoning Visual Grounding

Apr 28, 2026cs.CV

FCMBench-Video: Benchmarking Document Video Intelligence

Document understanding is a critical capability in financial credit review, onboarding, and remote verification, where both decision accuracy and evidence traceability matter. Compared with static document images, document videos present a temporally redundant and sequentially unfolding evidence stream, require evidence integration across frames, and preserve acquisition-process cues relevant to authenticity-sensitive and anti-fraud review. We introduce FCMBench-Video, a benchmark for document-video intelligence that evaluates document perception, temporal grounding, and evidence-grounded reasoning under realistic capture conditions. For privacy-compliant yet realistic data at scale, we organize construction as an atomic-acquisition and composition workflow that records reusable single-document clips, applies controlled degradations, and assembles long-form multi-document videos with prescribed temporal spans. FCMBench-Video is built from 495 atomic videos composed into 1,200 long-form videos paired with 11,322 expert-annotated question--answer instances, covering 28 document types over 20s--60s duration tiers and 5,960 Chinese / 5,362 English instances. Evaluations on nine recent Video-MLLMs show that FCMBench-Video provides meaningful separation across systems and capabilities: counting is the most duration-sensitive task, Cross-Document Validation and Evidence-Grounded Selection probe higher-level evidence integration, and Visual Prompt Injection provides a complementary robustness dimension. The overall score distribution is broad and approximately bell-shaped, indicating a benchmark that is neither saturated nor dominated by trivial cases. Together, these results position FCMBench-Video as a reproducible benchmark for tracking Video-MLLM progress on document-video understanding and probing capability boundaries in authenticity-sensitive credit-domain applications.

Runze Cui, Fangxin Shang, Yehui Yang +3

AI Lab, Qifu Technology, Beijing, China · School of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China · Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou, China +1

VLM Evaluation Document Understanding Temporal Video Grounding Video Understanding VLM Robustness Evidence-Grounded Reasoning

Apr 28, 2026cs.CV

One Perturbation, Two Failure Modes: Probing VLM Safety via Embedding-Guided Typographic Perturbations

Typographic prompt injection exploits vision language models' (VLMs) ability to read text rendered in images, posing a growing threat as VLMs power autonomous agents. Prior work typically focus on maximizing attack success rate (ASR) but does not explain \emph{why} certain renderings bypass safety alignment. We make two contributions. First, an empirical study across four VLMs including GPT-4o and Claude, twelve font sizes, and ten transformations reveals that multimodal embedding distance strongly predicts ASR (

r{=}{-}0.71

to

{-}0.93

,

p{<}0.01

), providing an interpretable, model agnostic proxy. Since embedding distance predicts ASR, reducing it should improve attack success, but the relationship is mediated by two factors: perceptual readability (whether the VLM can parse the text) and safety alignment (whether it refuses to comply). Second, we use this as a red teaming tool: we directly maximize image text embedding similarity under bounded

\ell_\infty

perturbations via CWA-SSA across four surrogate embedding models, stress testing both factors without access to the target model. Experiments across five degradation settings on GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Mistral-Large-3, and Qwen3-VL confirm that optimization recovers readability and reduces safety aligned refusals as two co-occurring effects, with the dominant mechanism depending on the model's safety filter strength and the degree of visual degradation.

Ravikumar Balakrishnan, Sanket Mendapara

Cisco Systems

VLM Evaluation VLM Robustness Adversarial Attacks on VLMs Adversarial Attacks

Apr 27, 2026cs.CV

Probing CLIP's Comprehension of 360-Degree Textual and Visual Semantics

The dream of instantly creating rich 360-degree panoramic worlds from text is rapidly becoming a reality, yet a crucial gap exists in our ability to reliably evaluate their semantic alignment. Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) models, standard AI evaluators, predominantly trained on perspective image-text pairs, face an open question regarding their understanding of the unique characteristics of 360-degree panoramic image-text pairs. This paper addresses this gap by first introducing two concepts: \emph{360-degree textual semantics}, semantic information conveyed by explicit format identifiers, and \emph{360-degree visual semantics}, invariant semantics under horizontal circular shifts. To probe CLIP's comprehension of these semantics, we then propose novel evaluation methodologies using keyword manipulation and horizontal circular shifts of varying magnitudes. Rigorous statistical analyses across popular CLIP configurations reveal that: (1) CLIP models effectively leverage explicit textual identifiers, demonstrating an understanding of 360-degree textual semantics; and (2) CLIP models fail to robustly preserve semantic alignment under horizontal circular shifts, indicating limited comprehension of 360-degree visual semantics. To address this limitation, we propose a LoRA-based fine-tuning framework that explicitly instills invariance to circular shifts. Our fine-tuned models exhibit improved comprehension of 360-degree visual semantics, though with a slight degradation in original semantic evaluation performance, highlighting a fundamental trade-off in adapting CLIP to 360-degree panoramic images. Code is available at https://github.com/littlewhitesea/360Semantics.

Hai Wang, Xiaochen Yang, Mingzhi Dong +1

Department of Statistical Science, University College London, UK · School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, UK · Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, UK.

VLM Evaluation VLM Adaptation Text-Image Alignment Invariant Representation Learning Vision-Language Pretraining

Apr 27, 2026cs.AI

A systematic evaluation of vision-language models for observational astronomical reasoning tasks

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed as general-purpose tools for scientific data interpretation, yet their reliability on real astronomical observations across diverse modalities remains untested. We present AstroVLBench, a comprehensive benchmark comprising over 4,100 expert-verified instances across five tasks spanning optical imaging, radio interferometry, multi-wavelength photometry, time-domain light curves, and optical spectroscopy. Evaluating six frontier models, we find that performance is strongly modality-dependent: while one model (Gemini 3 Pro) emerges as the most consistently capable across tasks, task-specific strengths vary, and all models substantially underperform domain-specialized methods. Mechanistic ablations reveal that performance depends not only on directing attention to salient visual features but also on grounding those features in physical knowledge. Phenomenological prompts describing what to look for improve accuracy by sharpening model focus, but physical prompts explaining why those features matter perform better overall and yield more balanced classifications with reduced class-specific bias. Consistent with this picture, presenting the underlying one-dimensional measurements directly as numerical tables instead of rendered plots yields up to 13 percentage points improvement. Reasoning quality analysis further demonstrates that, without explicit physical grounding, models may reach correct predictions from phenomenologically plausible cues while providing physically imprecise justifications, establishing that accuracy alone is insufficient for trustworthy scientific deployment. These findings provide the first systematic, multi-modal baselines for VLMs in observational astronomy and identify the specific representation, grounding, and reasoning bottlenecks where current models fail.

Wenke Ren, Hengxiao Guo, Wenwen Zuo +1

Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China · Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Models Vision-Language Grounding VLM Reasoning

Apr 27, 2026cs.CV

AutoGUI-v2: A Comprehensive Multi-Modal GUI Functionality Understanding Benchmark

Autonomous agents capable of navigating Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) hold the potential to revolutionize digital productivity. However, achieving true digital autonomy extends beyond reactive element matching; it necessitates a predictive mental model of interface dynamics and the ability to foresee the "digital world state" resulting from interactions. Despite the perceptual capabilities of modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs), existing benchmarks remain bifurcated (focusing either on black-box task completion or static, shallow grounding), thereby failing to assess whether agents truly comprehend the implicit functionality and transition logic of GUIs. To bridge this gap, we introduce AutoGUI-v2, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate deep GUI functionality understanding and interaction outcome prediction. We construct the benchmark using a novel VLM-human collaborative pipeline that recursively parses multi-platform screenshots into hierarchical functional regions to generate diverse evaluation tasks. Providing 2,753 tasks across six operating systems, AutoGUI-v2 rigorously tests agents on region and element-level semantics, grounding, and dynamic state prediction. Our evaluation reveals a striking dichotomy in VLMs: while open-source models fine-tuned on agent data (e.g., Qwen3-VL) excel at functional grounding, commercial models (e.g., Gemini-2.5-Pro-Thinking) dominate in functionality captioning. Crucially, all models struggle with complex interaction logic of uncommon actions, highlighting that deep functional understanding remains a significant hurdle. By systematically measuring these foundational capabilities, AutoGUI-v2 offers a new lens for advancing the next generation of GUI agents.

Hongxin Li, Xiping Wang, Jingran Su +4

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) · 2New Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (NLPR), CASIA · 3State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems (MAIS), CASIA +3

VLM Evaluation GUI Agents AI Agent Benchmarks

Apr 27, 2026cs.CV

SycoPhantasy: Quantifying Sycophancy and Hallucination in Small Open Weight VLMs for Vision-Language Scoring of Fantasy Characters

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as evaluators in tasks requiring nuanced image understanding, yet their reliability in scoring alignment between images and text descriptions remains underexplored. We investigate whether small, open-weight VLMs exhibit \emph{sycophantic} behavior when evaluating image-text alignment: assigning high scores without grounding their judgments in visual evidence. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce the \emph{Bluffing Coefficient} (\bc), a metric that measures the mismatch between a model's score and its evidence recall. We evaluate six open-weight VLMs ranging from 450M to 8B parameters on a benchmark of 173,810 AI-generated character portraits paired with detailed textual descriptions. Our analysis reveals a significant inverse correlation between model size and sycophancy rate (

r = -0.96

,

p = 0.002

), with smaller models exhibiting substantially higher rates of unjustified high scores. The smallest model tested (LFM2-VL, 450M) produced sycophantic evaluations in 22.3% of cases, compared to 6.0% for the largest (LLaVA-1.6, 7B). These findings have direct implications for the deployment of small, open-weight VLMs as automated evaluators within attribute-rich, synthetic image evaluation tasks, where the gap between assigned scores and cited visual evidence is both measurable and consequential.

Arya Shah, Deepali Mishra, Chaklam Silpasuwanchai

IIT Gandhinagar Gandhinagar, India · IIT Kanpur Kanpur, India · Asian Institute of Technology Bangkok, Thailand

VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Models Vision-Language Alignment Vision-Language Model-as-a-Judge

Apr 27, 2026cs.CV

ReVSI: Rebuilding Visual Spatial Intelligence Evaluation for Accurate Assessment of VLM 3D Reasoning

Current evaluations of spatial intelligence can be systematically invalid under modern vision-language model (VLM) settings. First, many benchmarks derive question-answer (QA) pairs from point-cloud-based 3D annotations originally curated for traditional 3D perception. When such annotations are treated as ground truth for video-based evaluation, reconstruction and annotation artifacts can miss objects that are clearly visible in the video, mislabel object identities, or corrupt geometry-dependent answers (e.g., size), yielding incorrect or ambiguous QA pairs. Second, evaluations often assume full-scene access, while many VLMs operate on sparsely sampled frames (e.g., 16-64), making many questions effectively unanswerable under the actual model inputs. We improve evaluation validity by introducing ReVSI, a benchmark and protocol that ensures each QA pair is answerable and correct under the model's actual inputs. To this end, we re-annotate objects and geometry across 381 scenes from 5 datasets to improve data quality, and regenerate all QA pairs with rigorous bias mitigation and human verification using professional 3D annotation tools. We further enhance evaluation controllability by providing variants across multiple frame budgets (16/32/64/all) and fine-grained object visibility metadata, enabling controlled diagnostic analyses. Evaluations of general and domain-specific VLMs on ReVSI reveal systematic failure modes that are obscured by prior benchmarks, yielding a more reliable and diagnostic assessment of spatial intelligence.

Yiming Zhang, Jiacheng Chen, Jiaqi Tan +3

1Simon Fraser University · 2Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · University of Waterloo +1

VLM Evaluation Spatial Reasoning Benchmarks 3D Spatial Reasoning 3D Scene Understanding

Apr 25, 2026cs.CV

PushupBench: Your VLM is not good at counting pushups

Large vision-language models (VLMs) can recognize \textit{what} happens in video but fail to count \textit{how many} times. We introduce \textbf{PushupBench}, 446 long-form clips (avg. 36.7s) for evaluating repetition counting. The best frontier model achieves 42.1% exact accuracy; open-source 4B models score

\sim

6%, matching supervised baselines. We show that accuracy alone misleads -- weaker models exploit the modal count rather than reason temporally. Fine-tuning on counting with 1k samples transfers to general video understanding: MVBench (+2.15), PerceptionTest (+1.88), TVBench (+4.54), suggesting counting is a proxy for broader temporal reasoning.PushupBench incorporated in \texttt{lmms-eval} (https://github.com/EvolvingLMMs-Lab/lmms-eval/pull/1262) and hosted on (pushupbench.com/)

Shengzhi Li, Jiarun Chen, Karun Sharma +2

VLM Evaluation Video-Language Model Evaluation Large Vision-Language Models Temporal Video Understanding Multimodal Understanding

Apr 25, 2026cs.LG

GAZE: Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation with Viewer-Level Tools and Literature Retrieval on Rare Brain MRI

Vision-language models (VLMs) read an image and produce text in a single forward pass, whereas radiologists typically inspect an image several times and consult the literature before writing a report. We introduce GAZE (Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation), a framework that lets a medical VLM work in this iterative way by calling viewer-level tools (zoom, windowing, contrast, edge detection) and two retrieval tools backed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed for medical literature, Open-i for radiological images), with structured outputs validated against a schema and full tool-call traces recorded for auditability. On NOVA, a benchmark of 906 brain MRI cases covering 281 rare neurological conditions, GAZE reaches 58.2 mean average precision (mAP) at intersection-over-union (IoU) 0.3 for lesion localisation and 34.9% Top-1 diagnostic accuracy under a joint protocol that scores captioning, diagnosis, and localisation from the image alone, without task-specific fine-tuning. Before any tool is used, structured prompting and schema-validated outputs already improve over the published Gemini 2.0 Flash baseline (20.2 to 29.4 [email protected]), so framework design is itself an experimental variable. Tool use helps rare pathologies disproportionately: the fraction of cases with IoU > 0.3 rises from 17% to 58% for diagnoses with three or fewer examples versus 25% to 68% for common conditions (

\geq

10 cases), with gains tracking engagement (Gemini 3 Flash: Cohen's d = 0.79, 11.8 tool calls per case; Gemini 2.0 Flash: tools used in 8.2% of cases, no significant benefit). Retrieval ablations additionally reveal a model-dependent trade-off in which gains in diagnosis can coincide with losses in localisation, reinforcing the case for joint evaluation of diagnosis, localisation, and captioning in medical VLMs.

Duaa Alim, Mogtaba Alim, Liam Chalcroft

Imperial College London, UK · University of Toronto, Canada · University College London, UK

VLM Evaluation Rare Disease Diagnosis Healthcare Tool-Using Vision-Language Agents Medical Image Localization Medical Image Benchmarks

Apr 23, 2026cs.CV

When Prompts Override Vision: Prompt-Induced Hallucinations in LVLMs

Despite impressive progress in capabilities of large vision-language models (LVLMs), these systems remain vulnerable to hallucinations, i.e., outputs that are not grounded in the visual input. Prior work has attributed hallucinations in LVLMs to factors such as limitations of the vision backbone or the dominance of the language component, yet the relative importance of these factors remains unclear. To resolve this ambiguity, We propose HalluScope, a benchmark to better understand the extent to which different factors induce hallucinations. Our analysis indicates that hallucinations largely stem from excessive reliance on textual priors and background knowledge, especially information introduced through textual instructions. To mitigate hallucinations induced by textual instruction priors, we propose HalluVL-DPO, a framework for fine-tuning off-the-shelf LVLMs towards more visually grounded responses. HalluVL-DPO leverages preference optimization using a curated training dataset that we construct, guiding the model to prefer grounded responses over hallucinated ones. We demonstrate that our optimized model effectively mitigates the targeted hallucination failure mode, while preserving or improving performance on other hallucination benchmarks and visual capability evaluations. To support reproducibility and further research, we will publicly release our evaluation benchmark, preference training dataset, and code at https://pegah-kh.github.io/projects/prompts-override-vision/ .

Pegah Khayatan, Jayneel Parekh, Arnaud Dapogny +3

1ISIR, Sorbonne Universit´e, Paris, France · 2Valeo.ai, Paris, France

VLM Evaluation LLM Hallucination Mitigation Hallucination in Language Models VLM Hallucination VLM Hallucination Mitigation

Apr 23, 2026cs.CV

From Codebooks to VLMs: Evaluating Automated Visual Discourse Analysis for Climate Change on Social Media

Social media platforms have become primary arenas for climate communication, generating millions of images and posts that - if systematically analysed - can reveal which communication strategies mobilise public concern and which fall flat. We aim to facilitate such research by analysing how computer vision methods can be used for social media discourse analysis. This analysis includes application-based taxonomy design, model selection, prompt engineering, and validation. We benchmark six promptable vision-language models and 15 zero-shot CLIP-like models on two datasets from X (formerly Twitter) - a 1,038-image expert-annotated set and a larger corpus of over 1.2 million images, with 50,000 labels manually validated - spanning five annotation dimensions: animal content, climate change consequences, climate action, image setting, and image type. Among the models benchmarked, Gemini-3.1-flash-lite outperforms all others across all super-categories and both datasets, while the gap to open-weight models of moderate size remains relatively small. Beyond instance-level metrics, we advocate for distributional evaluation: VLM predictions can reliably recover population level trends even when per-image accuracy is moderate, making them a viable starting point for discourse analysis at scale. We find that chain-of-thought reasoning reduces rather than improves performance, and that annotation dimension specific prompt design improves performance. We release tweet IDs and labels along with our code at https://github.com/KathPra/Codebooks2VLMs.git.

Katharina Prasse, Steffen Jung, Isaac Bravo +4

Chair of Machine Learning, University of Mannheim Mannheim, BW 68131, Germany · Department of Governance, Technical University Munich München, BA 80333, Germany · Clausthal University of Technology Clausthal-Zellerfeld, NI 38678, Germany +1

VLM Evaluation Social Media Analysis Prompt Engineering

Apr 23, 2026cs.CV

Seeing Isn't Believing: Uncovering Blind Spots in Evaluator Vision-Language Models

Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate outputs of other models, for image-to-text (I2T) tasks such as visual question answering, and text-to-image (T2I) generation tasks. Despite this growing reliance, the reliability of these Evaluator VLMs remains under explored. In this work, we systematically evaluate the reliability of Evaluator VLMs across both I2T and T2I tasks. We introduce targeted perturbations that degrade output quality along key error dimensions, including object hallucinations, spatial reasoning, factual grounding, and visual fidelity. These perturbations test whether Evaluator VLMs can reliably account for these quality degrading errors in their evaluations. Using a comprehensive benchmark of over 4000 perturbed instances spanning 40 perturbation dimensions, we evaluate 4 prominent VLMs using single-answer scoring, pairwise comparison, and reference-guided paradigms. Our findings reveal that current VLM evaluators exhibit substantial blind spots: they often fail to detect perturbed outputs - in some cases exceeding 50%, struggle particularly with fine-grained compositional and spatial errors, and are often insensitive to hallucinated content that contradicts the input image. Pairwise comparison proves more reliable, though failure rates persist. These results highlight the unreliable nature of current Evaluator VLMs and urge caution in their deployment for benchmarking and development decisions. Code and data have been made publicly available.

Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Sanjay Suryanarayanan, Tushar Anand +1

♠Nilekani Centre at AI4Bharat ♢Indian Institute of Technology Madras · ♠Nilekani Centre at AI4Bharat · ♣BITS Pilani, Hyderabad

VLM Evaluation VLM Robustness Language Model Generation Evaluation Vision-Language Model-as-a-Judge T2I Generation Evaluation

Apr 23, 2026cs.CV

VG-CoT: Towards Trustworthy Visual Reasoning via Grounded Chain-of-Thought

The advancement of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) requires precise local region-based reasoning that faithfully grounds the model's logic in actual visual evidence. However, existing datasets face limitations in scalability due to extensive manual annotation and lack of explicit alignment between multi-step reasoning and corresponding image regions, which constrains the evaluation of model trustworthiness. To address these challenges, we propose the Visual Grounding Chain-of-Thought (VG-CoT) dataset, which explicitly links each reasoning step to real visual evidence within the image through a fully automated three-stage pipeline. The pipeline first extracts object- and text-level visual evidence using state-of-the-art detection and OCR models, then generates step-by-step grounded reasoning with GPT-4o, and finally refines the grounding through a rationale-driven open-set detection process. In addition, we introduce a new benchmark that comprehensively evaluates LVLMs reasoning across three complementary dimensions: Rationale Quality, Answer Accuracy, and Reasoning-Answer Alignment. Experiments with representative LVLMs, including LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen2-VL, demonstrate consistent improvements on most evaluation metrics, confirming that VG-CoT effectively enhances trustworthy, evidence-based reasoning while maintaining scalable and cost-efficient dataset construction. The dataset and code will be released publicly upon acceptance to facilitate further research.

Byeonggeuk Lim, Kyeonghyun Kim, JungMin Yun +1

Graduate School of Advanced Imaging Science, Multimedia & Film, Chung-Ang University1 · Department of Artificial Intelligence, Chung-Ang University2

VLM Evaluation CoT Reasoning Vision-Language Grounding VLM Reasoning Visually Grounded Reasoning

Apr 23, 2026cs.AI

Can MLLMs "Read" What is Missing?

We introduce MMTR-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the intrinsic ability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to reconstruct masked text directly from visual context. Unlike conventional question-answering tasks, MMTR-Bench eliminates explicit prompts, requiring models to recover masked text from single- or multi-page inputs across real-world domains such as documents and webpages. This design isolates the reconstruction task from instruction-following abilities, enabling a direct assessment of a model's layout understanding, visual grounding, and knowledge integration. MMTR-Bench comprises 2,771 test samples spanning multiple languages and varying target lengths. To account for this diversity, we propose a level-aware evaluation protocol. Experiments on representative MLLMs show that the benchmark poses a significant challenge, especially for sentence- and paragraph-level reconstruction. The homepage is available at https://mmtr-bench-dataset.github.io/MMTR-Bench/.

Jindi Guo, Chaozheng Huang, Xi Fang

DP Technology

VLM Evaluation Document Understanding Multimodal Large Language Models Vision-Language Grounding Multimodal Understanding

Apr 22, 2026cs.CV

OMIBench: Benchmarking Olympiad-Level Multi-Image Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Model

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have made substantial advances in reasoning tasks at the Olympiad level. Nevertheless, current Olympiad-level multimodal reasoning benchmarks for these models often emphasize single-image analysis and fail to exploit contextual information across multiple images. We present OMIBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate Olympiad-level reasoning when the required evidence is distributed over multiple images. It contains problems from biology, chemistry, mathematics, and physics Olympiads, together with manually annotated rationales and evaluation protocols for both exact and semantic answer matching. Across extensive experiments on OMIBench, we observe meaningful performance gaps in existing models. Even the strongest LVLMs, such as Gemini-3-Pro, attain only about 50% on the benchmark. These results position OMIBench as a focused resources for studying and improving multi-image reasoning in LVLMs.

Qiguang Chen, Chengyu Luan, Jiajun Wu +7

Research Center for Social Computing and Interactive Robotics, Harbin Institute of Technology · Central South University · Fudan University +3

VLM Evaluation Visual Reasoning Multimodal Reasoning Mathematical Reasoning VLM Reasoning

Apr 22, 2026cs.CV

The Expense of Seeing: Attaining Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning Within the Monolithic Paradigm

The rapid proliferation of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) is often framed as enabling unified multimodal knowledge discovery but rests on an under-examined assumption: that current VLMs faithfully synthesise multimodal data. We argue they often do not, and this gap reflects a trustworthiness problem in the dominant Vision Encoder-Projector-LLM paradigm. Rather than extracting grounded knowledge from visual inputs, state-of-the-art models frequently exhibit functional blindness, i.e., exploiting strong language priors to bypass severe visual representation bottlenecks. In this work, we challenge the conventional methodology of multimodal evaluation, which relies on data ablation or new dataset creation and therefore conflates dataset biases with architectural incapacity. We propose an information-theoretic departure: the Modality Translation Protocol, designed to quantify what we call the Expense of Seeing. By translating semantic payloads rather than ablating them, we formulate three novel metrics -- the Toll (ToS), Curse (CoS), and Fallacy (FoS) of Seeing -- culminating in the Semantic Sufficiency Criterion (SSC). Furthermore, we hypothesise a Divergence Law of Multimodal Scaling: as the underlying language engines scale to unprecedented reasoning capabilities, the penalty of the visual knowledge bottleneck may increase rather than diminish. We argue the community should move beyond "multimodal gain" as a primary evaluation target. By elevating the SSC from a passive diagnostic constraint to an active architectural blueprint, we provide a foundation for guiding the next generation of AI systems toward genuine multimodal reasoning.

Karan Goyal

IIIT Delhi, India

VLM Evaluation Multimodal Reasoning Vision-Language Grounding Modality Gap in VLMs Multimodal Model Evaluation Multimodal Understanding

Apr 22, 2026cs.CV

Evaluating Remote Sensing Image Captions Beyond Metric Biases

The core objective of image captioning is to achieve lossless semantic compression from visual signals into textual modalities. However, the reliance on manually curated reference texts for evaluation essentially forces models to mimic specific human annotation styles, thereby masking the true descriptive capabilities of advanced foundation models. This systemic misalignment prompts a critical question: Is task-specific fine-tuning truly necessary for Remote Sensing Image Captioning, or is the perceived performance gap merely an artifact of flawed evaluation criteria? To investigate this discrepancy, we propose ReconScore, a novel reference-free evaluation metric. Rather than computing textual similarities, we assess caption quality by its capability to reconstruct the original visual elements solely from the generated text, effectively neutralizing human annotation biases. Applying this metric, we uncover a profound, counterintuitive truth: inherently powerful, unfine-tuned MLLMs surpass their fine-tuned counterparts in authentic zero-shot RSIC tasks. Driven by this structural discovery, we introduce RemoteDescriber, a completely training-free generation methodology. By employing ReconScore as a self-correction mechanism, we iteratively refine the semantic precision of MLLM outputs without any computational fine-tuning overhead. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that RemoteDescriber achieves state-of-the-art performance on three datasets. Furthermore, we validate ReconScore's reliability and analyze the flaws of traditional metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhu-czy/RemoteDescriber.

Ziyun Chen, Fan Liu, Liang Yao +3

Hohai University Nanjing, China · Cardiff University Cardiff, UK

VLM Evaluation Remote Sensing Image Understanding LLM Self-Refinement Large Vision-Language Models

Apr 22, 2026cs.CV

EgoDyn-Bench: Evaluating Ego-Motion Understanding in Vision-Centric Foundation Models for Autonomous Driving

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced high-level reasoning in autonomous driving, their ability to ground this reasoning in the underlying physics of ego-motion remains poorly understood. We introduce EgoDyn-Bench [Project page: (https://tum-avs.github.io/EgoDyn-Bench-Website/), Code: (https://github.com/TUM-AVS/EgoDyn-Bench), Dataset: (https://huggingface.co/datasets/fnc1901/EgoDyn-Bench)], a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating the semantic ego-motion understanding of vision-centric foundation models. By mapping continuous vehicle kinematics to discrete motion concepts via a deterministic oracle, we decouple a model's internal physical logic from its visual perception. Our large-scale empirical audit spanning 20

+

models, including closed-source MLLMs, open-source VLMs across multiple scales, and specialized VLAs, identifies a significant Perception Bottleneck: while models exhibit logical physical concepts, they consistently fail to accurately align them with visual observations, frequently underperforming classical non-learned geometric baselines. This failure persists across model scales and domain-specific training, indicating a structural deficit in how current architectures couple visual perception with physical reasoning. We demonstrate that providing explicit trajectory encodings substantially restores physical consistency across all evaluated models, revealing a functional disentanglement between vision and language: ego-motion logic is derived almost exclusively from the language modality, while visual observations contribute negligible temporal signal. This structural finding provides a standardized diagnostic framework and a practical pathway toward physically aligned embodied AI. Ego-motion - Physical Reasoning - Foundation Models

Finn Rasmus Schäfer, Yuan Gao, Dingrui Wang +5

Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany · Bayerische Motoren Werke AG, Munich, Germany · Data Analytics and Machine Learning Group, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

VLM Evaluation Autonomous Driving Benchmarks VLMs for Autonomous Driving Vision Foundation Models Autonomous Driving Perception VLM Reasoning

Apr 21, 2026cs.CL

Culturally uneven urban perception in large language models

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to describe and evaluate cities, yet the cultural structure of their urban judgments remains understudied. Here we introduce a measurement framework for testing whether LLM-based urban perception is culturally neutral, using a globally stratified street-view image dataset. Open-ended descriptions and structured scores generated by three frontier multimodal models all show that the neutral baseline lies closer to regional framings associated with Europe and North America than to other cultural framings. Comparisons between AI and human urban perception further show that prompting can move AI responses closer to specific regional human descriptions, but fails to recover the variety and diversity of human responses, flattening observed demographic patterns and introducing sentiment-based self-favouring bias. These results indicate a systematic risk in treating AI as a neutral tool for urban tasks, especially when model outputs are used to compare, evaluate or represent cities across cultural contexts.

Rong Zhao, Wanqi Liu, Zhizhou Sha +3

Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA), UCL, London, UK · Department of Computer Science, UT Austin, Austin, TX, USA · School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

VLM Evaluation Social Bias in Language Models Cultural Bias in Language Models Cultural Knowledge in Language Models

Apr 21, 2026cs.CV

DistortBench: Benchmarking Vision Language Models on Image Distortion Identification

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in settings where sensitivity to low-level image degradations matters, including content moderation, image restoration, and quality monitoring. Yet their ability to recognize distortion type and severity remains poorly understood. We present DistortBench, a diagnostic benchmark for no-reference distortion perception in VLMs. DistortBench contains 13,500 four-choice questions covering 27 distortion types, six perceptual categories, and five severity levels: 25 distortions inherit KADID-10k calibrations, while two added rotation distortions use monotonic angle-based levels. We evaluate 18 VLMs, including 17 open-weight models from five families and one proprietary model. Despite strong performance on high-level vision-language tasks, the best model reaches only 61.9% accuracy, just below the human majority-vote baseline of 65.7% (average individual: 60.2%), indicating that low-level perceptual understanding remains a major weakness of current VLMs. Our analysis further reveals weak and non-monotonic scaling with model size, performance drops in most base--thinking pairs, and distinct severity-response patterns across model families. We hope DistortBench will serve as a useful benchmark for measuring and improving low-level visual perception in VLMs.

Divyanshu Goyal, Akhil Eppa, Vanya Bannihatti Kumar

Adobe Inc.

VLM Evaluation Benchmark Construction Image Quality Assessment

Apr 21, 2026cs.RO

Assessing VLM-Driven Semantic-Affordance Inference for Non-Humanoid Robot Morphologies

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding human-object interactions, but their application to robotic systems with non-humanoid morphologies remains largely unexplored. This work investigates whether VLMs can effectively infer affordances for robots with fundamentally different embodiments than humans, addressing a critical gap in the deployment of these models for diverse robotic applications. We introduce a novel hybrid dataset that combines annotated real-world robotic affordance-object relations with VLM-generated synthetic scenarios, and perform an empirical analysis of VLM performance across multiple object categories and robot morphologies, revealing significant variations in affordance inference capabilities. Our experiments demonstrate that while VLMs show promising generalisation to non-humanoid robot forms, their performance is notably inconsistent across different object domains. Critically, we identify a consistent pattern of low false positive rates but high false negative rates across all morphologies and object categories, indicating that VLMs tend toward conservative affordance predictions. Our analysis reveals that this pattern is particularly pronounced for novel tool use scenarios and unconventional object manipulations, suggesting that effective integration of VLMs in robotic systems requires complementary approaches to mitigate over-conservative behaviour while preserving the inherent safety benefits of low false positive rates.

Jess Jones, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Sabine Hauert

Bristol Robotics Laboratory, University of Bristol Bristol, United Kingdom · University of Bristol Bristol, United Kingdom

VLM Evaluation Cross-Embodiment Robot Learning VLMs for Robotics

Apr 21, 2026cs.CV

Seeing Candidates at Scale: Multimodal LLMs for Visual Political Communication on Instagram

This paper presents a computational case study that evaluates the capabilities of specialized machine learning models and emerging multimodal large language models for Visual Political Communication (VPC) analysis. Focusing on concentrated visibility in Instagram stories and posts during the 2021 German federal election campaign, we compare the performance of traditional computer vision models (FaceNet512, RetinaFace, Google Cloud Vision) with a multimodal large language model (GPT-4o) in identifying front-runner politicians and counting individuals in images. GPT-4o outperformed the other models, achieving a macro F1-score of 0.89 for face recognition and 0.86 for person counting in stories. These findings demonstrate the potential of advanced AI systems to scale and refine visual content analysis in political communication while highlighting methodological considerations for future research.

Michael Achmann-Denkler, Mario Haim, Christian Wolff

Media Informatics Group University of Regensburg Regensburg, Germany · Department of Media and Communication Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany

VLM Evaluation Social Media Analysis Face Recognition