cs.LGMar 20, 2026

Ontology-Based Knowledge Modeling and Uncertainty-Aware Outdoor Air Quality Assessment Using Weighted Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic

Authors: Md Inzmam, Ritesh Chandra, Sadhana Tiwari, Sonali Agarwal, Triloki Pant

Organizations: Department of Information Technology, Indian Institute of Information Technology Allahabad Prayagraj, India

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Outdoor air pollution is a major concern for the environment and public health, especially in areas where urbanization is taking place rapidly. The Indian Air Quality Index (IND-AQI), developed by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), is a standardized reporting system for air quality based on pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), and ammonia (NH3). However, the traditional calculation of the AQI uses crisp thresholds and deterministic aggregation rules, which are not suitable for handling uncertainty and transitions between classes. To address these limitations, this study proposes a hybrid ontology-based uncertainty-aware framework integrating Weighted Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic with semantic knowledge modeling. Interval Type-2 fuzzy sets are used to model uncertainty near AQI class boundaries, while pollutant importance weights are determined using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (IT2-FAHP) to reflect their relative health impacts. In addition, an OWL-based air quality ontology extending the Semantic Sensor Network (SSN) ontology is developed to represent pollutants, monitoring stations, AQI categories, regulatory standards, and environmental governance actions. Semantic reasoning is implemented using SWRL rules and validated through SPARQL queries to infer AQI categories, health risks, and recommended mitigation actions. Experimental evaluation using CPCB air quality datasets demonstrates that the proposed framework improves AQI classification reliability and uncertainty handling compared with traditional crisp and Type-1 fuzzy approaches, while enabling explainable semantic reasoning and intelligent decision support for air quality monitoring systems

More in this topic

Uncertainty Quantification

Uncertainty quantification estimates how reliable predictions and scientific inferences are, and how uncertainty propagates into decisions.

See all 647 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList
Mar 6, 2026

Bi Directional Feedback Fusion for Activity Aware Forecasting of Indoor CO2 and PM2.5

Indoor air quality (IAQ) forecasting plays a critical role in safeguarding occupant health, ensuring thermal comfort, and supporting intelligent building control. However, predicting future concentrations of key pollutants such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) remains challenging due to the complex interplay between environmental factors and highly dynamic occupant behaviours. Traditional data driven models primarily rely on historical sensor trajectories and often fail to anticipate behaviour induced emission spikes or rapid concentration shifts. To address these limitations, we present a dual stream bi directional feedback fusion framework that jointly models indoor environmental evolution and action derived embeddings representing human activities. The proposed architecture integrates a context aware modulation mechanism that adaptively scales and shifts each stream based on a shared, evolving fusion state, enabling the model to selectively emphasise behavioural cues or long term environmental trends. Furthermore, we introduce dual timescale temporal modules that independently capture gradual CO2 accumulation patterns and short term PM2.5 fluctuations. A composite loss function combining weighted mean squared error, spike aware penalties, and uncertainty regularisation facilitates robust learning under volatile indoor conditions. Extensive validation on real-world IAQ datasets demonstrates that our approach significantly outperforms state of the art forecasting baselines while providing interpretable uncertainty estimates essential for practical deployment in smart buildings and health-aware monitoring systems.

Harshala Gammulle, Lidia Morawska, Sridha Sridharan +1

Signal Processing, Artificial Intelligence and Vision Technologies (SAIVT) Lab, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. · International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health (ILAQH), Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Air Quality PredictionMultivariate Time Series ForecastingMultimodal Sensor Fusion
AskPDF
Sep 12, 2026

Measurement-Error-Aware Causal Distributed-Lag Quantile Modeling of Indoor Air Pollution and Short-Term Lung-Function Deterioration

Low-cost indoor air-quality sensors could support personalized asthma prevention, but their nonlinear measurement error, delayed exposure effects, time-varying confounding, and heterogeneous lower-tail responses limit risk estimation. We present CAUSALQUANT-ASTHMA, a measurement-error-aware causal quantile distributed-lag framework for short-horizon peak expiratory flow analysis. Sparse reference measurements train a nonlinear calibration model; stabilized sequential generalized-propensity weights address measured exposure assignment; and a susceptibility-modulated, smooth, noncrossing quantile model estimates lag-specific and sustained-exposure contrasts. Because no authorized cohort simultaneously provided dense indoor sensing, reference co-location, and outcome-compatible longitudinal data, evaluation used five semi-synthetic panels with known counterfactual truth, 150 patients and 12,600 patient-days per realization. Across eight methods, CAUSALQUANT achieved a dose-response integrated absolute error of 0.304 plus or minus 0.094, improving 24.2 percent over the strongest measurement-error and propensity-weighted baseline. It also obtained the lowest overall pinball loss, 1.065, while maintaining zero quantile crossings and 78.1 percent coverage for the nominal 80 percent interval. Sensor calibration reduced held-out exposure RMSE by 33.7 percent. Stress tests quantified degradation under sensor noise, missing personal measurements, and hidden confounding. These findings establish methodological feasibility and reproducibility, not clinical effectiveness; prospective, governance-approved external validation is required before patient-level interpretation or deployment.

Shayma Alkobaisi, Anas Ali

Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates · Department of Computer Science, National University of Modern languages, Lahore, Pakistan

Causal Effect EstimationCausal InferenceQuantile Regression
AskPDF
May 7, 2026

AirQualityBench: A Realistic Evaluation Benchmark for Global Air Quality Forecasting

Air-quality forecasting models are commonly evaluated on regional, preprocessed, and normalized datasets, where missing observations are removed or artificially completed. Such protocols simplify comparison but hide the conditions that dominate real monitoring networks: uneven global coverage, structured missingness, heterogeneous pollutant scales, and deployment cost. We introduce AirQualityBench, a global multi-pollutant benchmark designed to evaluate forecasting models under these realistic conditions. The benchmark contains hourly observations from 3,720 monitoring stations over 2021--2025, covers six major pollutants, and preserves provider-native observation masks. Rather than imputing a dense data tensor, AirQualityBench exposes missingness as part of the forecasting problem and reports errors on valid future observations after inverse transformation to physical concentration scales. Evaluating representative spatio-temporal models under this unified protocol shows that strong performance on sanitized datasets does not reliably transfer to global, fragmented monitoring streams. AirQualityBench therefore serves as a realistic testbed for scalable, mask-aware, and physically interpretable air-quality forecasting. All benchmark data, code, evaluation scripts, and baseline implementations are available at GitHub.

Xing Xu, Xu Wang, Yudong Zhang +3

University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, Anhui, China · 2Suzhou Institute for Advanced Research, USTC, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China · 3The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China

Benchmark DesignTime Series ForecastingForecasting BenchmarksAir Quality PredictionSpatiotemporal Forecasting
AskPDF