V2U4Real: A Real-world Large-scale Dataset for Vehicle-to-UAV Cooperative Perception
Organizations: Fujian Key Laboratory of Urban Intelligent Sensing and Computing, Xiamen University, China · Key Laboratory of Multimedia Trusted Perception and Efficient Computing, Ministry of Education of China, Xiamen University, China
Abstract
Modern autonomous vehicle perception systems are often constrained by occlusions, blind spots, and limited sensing range. While existing cooperative perception paradigms, such as Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I), have demonstrated their effectiveness in mitigating these challenges, they remain limited to ground-level collaboration and cannot fully address large-scale occlusions or long-range perception in complex environments. To advance research in cross-view cooperative perception, we present V2U4Real, the first large-scale real-world multi-modal dataset for Vehicle-to-UAV (V2U) cooperative object perception. V2U4Real is collected by a ground vehicle and a UAV equipped with multi-view LiDARs and RGB cameras. The dataset covers urban streets, university campuses, and rural roads under diverse traffic scenarios, comprising over 56K LiDAR frames, 56K multi-view camera images, and 700K annotated 3D bounding boxes across four classes. To support a wide range of research tasks, we establish benchmarks for single-agent 3D object detection, cooperative 3D object detection, and object tracking. Comprehensive evaluations of several state-of-the-art models demonstrate the effectiveness of V2U cooperation in enhancing perception robustness and long-range awareness. The V2U4Real dataset and codebase is available at https://github.com/VjiaLi/V2U4Real.
Figures & tables
| R/S | Dataset | Year | Paradigm | Vehicle Sensor | UAV Sensor | Data Details | Annotations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camera | LiDAR | Camera | LiDAR | PointCloud | Image | 3D Boxes | |||||
| OPV2V [ 33 ] | 2022 | V2V | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | 11K | 44K | 230K | D, T | |
| V2X-Sim [ 18 ] | 2022 | V2V & I | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | 10K | 60K | 26.6K | D, S, T | |
| V2XSet [ 32 ] | 2022 | V2V & I | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | 11.4K | 44K | 230K | D, T | |
| Sim | CoP-UAVs [ 10 ] | 2022 | U2U | - | - | ✓ | ✗ | - | 131.9K | 1.94M | D, S |
| UAV3D [ 25 ] | 2024 | U2U | - | - | ✓ | ✗ | - | 500K | 3.3M | D, S, T | |
| Platform | Sensor | Sensor Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | LiDAR | Ouster-1-128( 1) | 128 channels, 10Hz capture frequency, horizontal FOV, vertical FOV, 200m range; |
| LiDAR | RoboSense Ruby-Plus-128 ( 1) | 128 channels, 10Hz capture frequency, horizontal FOV, vertical FOV, 250m range; | |
| LiDAR | RoboSense M1 Plus( 1) | 10Hz capture frequency, horizontal FOV, vertical FOV, 200m range; | |
| Camera | HikRobot MV-CA023-10GC ( 3) | RGB, 10Hz capture frequency, 1920×1080 resolution; | |
| GPS/IMU | Quectel LC29H ( 1) / Sigma-D4G ( 1) | 1000Hz update rate, RTK supported, Double-Precision; | |
| UAV | LiDAR | Ouster-1-128 ( 1) | 128 channels, 10Hz capture frequency, horizontal FOV, vertical FOV, 200m range; |
| Paradigm | Method | Year | Sync. (3D AP@IoU = 0.5 / 0.7) | Async. (3D AP@IoU = 0.5 / 0.7) | AM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0–50m | 50–100m | Overall | 0–50m | 50–100m | (MB) | |||
| Vehicle to UAV | Early Fusion | - | 51.31/30.97 | 57.53/35.67 | 24.47/14.99 | 30.94/13.99 | 34.17/15.85 | 20.33/8.91 | 3.18 |
| Late Fusion | - | 43.61/27.74 | 49.28/31.73 | 16.75/8.56 | 28.08/16.18 | 29.63/17.31 | 13.87/6.56 | 0.009 | |
| Where2comm [ 10 ] | 2022 | 53.85/29.71 | 60.47/33.14 | 26.73/16.59 | 48.99/28.36 | 55.30/31.83 | 25.51/14.46 | 0.65 | |
| V2X-ViT [ 32 ] | 2022 | 45.51/25.99 | 50.98/29.65 | 19.67/12.24 | 45.74/26.00 | 51.29/29.68 | 19.65/12.13 | 0.65 | |
| AttFuse [ 33 ] | 2022 | 50.20/27.33 | 55.31/30.41 | 29.33/18.39 | 40.51/21.92 | 44.71/23.41 | 28.51/16.98 | 0.65 | |
| Platform | Method | Veh. (3D AP@IoU) | Cyc. (3D AP@IoU) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ||
| Vehicle | PointPillars [ 16 ] | 67.06 | 30.22 | 60.45 | 50.12 |
| SECOND [ 35 ] | 60.64 | 30.01 | 57.67 | 49.98 | |
| CenterPoint [ 36 ] | 65.79 | 26.96 | 59.89 | 50.48 | |
| PV-RCNN [ 24 ] | 68.18 | 36.23 | 59.51 | 51.31 | |
| UAV | PointPillars [ 16 ] | 70.09 | 47.06 | 57.33 | 41.61 |
| Paradigm | Method | Year | AMOTA(↑) | AMOTP(↑) | sAMOTA(↑) | MOTA(↑) | MOTP(↑) | MT(↑) | ML(↓) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle to UAV | Early Fusion | - | 19.22 | 39.41 | 56.79 | 59.26 | 64.67 | 67.94 | 23.81 |
| Late Fusion | - | 14.82 | 34.39 | 51.12 | 50.64 | 64.90 | 48.41 | 37.30 | |
| AttFuse [ 33 ] | 2022 | 20.98 | 41.31 | 61.55 | 60.40 | 64.89 | 57.94 | 23.81 | |
| Where2comm [ 10 ] | 2022 | 20.07 | 41.49 | 58.52 | 62.07 | 63.04 | 65.08 | 15.87 | |
| V2X-ViT [ 32 ] | 2022 | 14.74 | 35.25 | 50.38 | 50.76 | 64.76 | 57.94 | 30.16 | |
| CoBEVT [ 31 ] | 2022 | 15.96 | 36.53 | 52.62 | 53.60 | 64.54 | 51.59 | 35.71 |
Appendix figures & tables13 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Sensor | Model | Cost ($) |
|---|---|---|
| LiDAR | OS-128 / RS-128 / M1-Plus | 12K / 9K / 3K |
| Camera | HikRobot MV-CA023-10GC | 700 |
| GPS/IMU | Quectel / Sigma100 / DETA100 | 35 / 1K / 200 |
| Split | Sequence | Scene | Frames | Vehicles | Cyclists | Pedestrians | Track IDs | Duration (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train | 2025-07-17-16-12-1 | Urban | 1200 | 7140 | 1036 | 0 | 112 | 30.0 |
| 2025-07-17-16-12-2 | Urban | 1244 | 9255 | 1386 | 0 | 138 | 31.1 | |
| 2025-07-17-16-12-3 | Urban | 1116 | 13865 | 1116 | 0 | 145 | 27.9 | |
| 2025-07-17-16-12-4 | Urban | 1208 | 8890 | 1551 | 0 | 129 | 30.2 | |
| 2025-07-17-16-35-3 | Urban | 3112 | 10175 | 18342 | 2730 | 241 | 77.8 | |
| 2025-07-17-16-50-1 | Urban | 1528 | 7247 | 14733 | 1953 | 207 | 38.2 |
| LiDAR Type | Method | Vehicle (3D AP@IoU) | Cyclist (3D AP@IoU) | Pedestrian (3D AP@IoU) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.5 | ||
| Ruby-128 | PointPillars [ 16 ] | 60.57 | 29.57 | 59.62 | 45.30 | 38.08 | 27.65 |
| SECOND [ 35 ] | 56.61 | 32.01 | 52.73 | 42.29 | 48.15 | 36.97 | |
| CenterPoint [ 36 ] | 58.24 | 26.93 | 56.39 | 42.56 | 58.79 | 43.64 | |
| PV-RCNN [ 24 ] | 65.91 | 41.99 | 67.11 | 53.35 | 45.06 | 37.92 | |
| M1-Plus | PointPillars [ 16 ] | 41.37 | 20.81 | 53.28 | 41.40 | 15.06 | 9.09 |
| Paradigm | Method | Year | Sync. (3D AP@IoU = 0.5 / 0.7) | Async. (3D AP@IoU = 0.5 / 0.7) | AM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 0–50m | 50–100m | Overall | 0–50m | 50–100m | (MB) | |||
| Vehicle to UAV | Early Fusion | - | 45.44/20.76 | 49.59/22.38 | 20.56/13.16 | 24.63/9.63 | 26.29/9.71 | 16.53/11.01 | 3.18 |
| Late Fusion | - | 36.76/13.20 | 39.89/14.06 | 11.53/8.29 | 23.48/8.14 | 24.62/8.38 | 10.22/7.37 | 0.009 | |
| Where2comm [ 10 ] | 2022 | 33.14/12.14 | 36.31/12.94 | 16.69/12.45 | 30.68/10.81 | 33.50/11.26 | 16.58/12.44 | 0.65 | |
| V2X-ViT [ 32 ] | 2022 | 29.69/11.65 | 33.24/12.63 | 10.92/7.93 | 29.72/11.62 | 33.23/12.76 | 10.87/7.80 | 0.65 | |
| AttFuse [ 33 ] | 2022 | 38.75/17.22 | 43.17/18.95 | 17.57/12.23 | 29.76/11.65 | 33.00/11.87 | 17.06/11.87 | 0.65 | |
| Method | Epoch | Batch | LR | LR Scheduler | Voxel Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PointPillar [ 16 ] | 40 | 4 | 0.002 | OneCycle | |
| SECOND [ 35 ] | 40 | 4 | 0.002 | OneCycle | |
| CenterPoint [ 36 ] | 40 | 4 | 0.002 | OneCycle | |
| PV-RCNN [ 24 ] | 40 | 4 | 0.002 | OneCycle |
| Method | Batch | LR Scheduler | LiDAR Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| No Fusion | 4 | OneCycle | |
| Early Fusion | 4 | MultiStep | |
| Late Fusion | 4 | MultiStep | |
| Where2comm [ 10 ] | 4 | CAW | |
| V2X-VIT [ 32 ] | 2 | CAW | |
| AttFuse [ 33 ] | 4 | MultiStep |
| Dataset | Localization Noise ( / ) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X (m) | Y (m) | Z (m) | Yaw ( ∘ ) | IoU (%) | |
| V2V4Real | 7.0/48.4 | 0.6/20.3 | 0.1/1.4 | 0.05/1.5 | 2.4/11.0 |
| Ours | 2.4/6.8 | 1.6/2.9 | 1.0/1.1 | 0.1/1.5 | 4.6/11.6 |