Is Clinical Text Enough? A Multimodal Study on Mortality Prediction in Heart Failure Patients

Cancer treatments are known to introduce cardiotoxicity, negatively impacting outcomes and survivorship. Identifying cancer patients at risk of heart failure (HF) is critical to improving cancer treatment outcomes and safety. This study examined machine learning (ML) models to identify cancer patients at risk of HF using electronic health records (EHRs), including traditional ML, Time-Aware long short-term memory (T-LSTM), and large language models (LLMs) using novel narrative features derived from the structured medical codes. We identified a cancer cohort of 12,806 patients from the University of Florida Health, diagnosed with lung, breast, and colorectal cancers, among which 1,602 individuals developed HF after cancer. The LLM, GatorTron-3.9B, achieved the best F1 scores, outperforming the traditional support vector machines by 39%, the T-LSTM deep learning model by 7%, and a widely used transformer model, BERT, by 5.6%. The analysis shows that the proposed narrative features remarkably increased feature density and improved performance.

Autoregressive foundation models trained on tokenized electronic health records (EHRs) can support zero-shot clinical prediction, yet most operate on structured event codes alone, and do not incorporate multiple modalities in a principled way. We present a framework for conditioning such models on auxiliary clinical modalities, including ECG waveforms, chest X-ray images, and clinical notes, using modality-specific latent compression and gated cross-attention with temporal alignment. We investigate two key design choices: (1) how to compress long per-modality sequences (e.g., ECG time series) before they enter the multi-modal cross-attention. This feature may be essential to reduce compute overheads and may be beneficial for generalization; (2) how the choice of pretrained encoder for each modality impacts downstream performance. Through controlled ablations on MIMIC-IV, we show that the best latent-compression configurations outperforms both uncompressed cross-attention and mean pooling. Encoder choice has a clear within-modality effect, with stronger pretrained encoders consistently outperforming weaker alternatives. We further show that merely adding auxiliary modalities does not guarantee improvement on ICU mortality prediction over an EHR-only baseline. This implies that careful design of the fusion architecture and an appropriate evaluation in the clinical context are required.

Emergency department (ED) decision-making relies on heterogeneous clinical information, including patient history, vital signs, laboratory results, and electrocardiograms (ECGs). Vision--language models (VLMs) can jointly process these modalities, but strong predictive performance does not necessarily imply meaningful use of the correct patient's ECG. We term this failure mode ECG Mirage: apparent multimodal capability without useful dependence on patient-specific ECG information. We distinguish two forms: ECG neglect, where ECGs provide little predictive benefit, and ECG confusion, where matched ECGs outperform no-image inputs but not mismatched ECGs. To evaluate these behaviours, we compare predictions obtained with matched ECGs, outcome-discordant mismatched ECGs, and no-image inputs while holding the clinical text and prediction targets fixed. Across four VLMs on MDS-ED, matched ECGs provide no consistent advantage for either ICU admission or clinical deterioration prediction. We then train four restricted visual prompts using supervised learning followed by conditional direct preference optimisation, while keeping the VLM backbone frozen. The resulting models achieve balanced accuracies of 70.6% for ICU admission and 67.5% for deterioration and increase the matched-versus-mismatched performance gap to approximately 16.5 and 5.5 percentage points, respectively. Overall, our study identifies ECG Mirage in multimodal clinical prediction and introduces visual prompt tuning as an efficient mitigation strategy.