RACF: A Resilient Autonomous Car Framework with Object Distance Correction

Autonomous driving (AD) relies on multi-sensor perception to interpret the surrounding environment. However, the robustness of camera--radar fusion under adversarial conditions remains largely unexplored. This paper presents a systematic measurement study of the robustness of camera--radar sensor fusion in AD. We construct a unified evaluation pipeline on the nuScenes dataset that simulates attacks on both sensing modalities, including eight camera-image perturbations and three radar point-cloud perturbations. We evaluate five camera--radar fusion algorithms across two perception tasks, 3D object detection and depth estimation, and quantify their performance under clean and attacked inputs using standard metrics. Our evaluation reveals a clear asymmetry in the robustness of fusion systems. Camera perturbations substantially degrade both object detection and depth estimation, and moderate attack strengths are already sufficient to cause severe performance degradation. In contrast, the evaluated radar perturbations produce smaller and task-dependent effects, with object-detection models showing particularly limited degradation. Our analysis attributes this difference to the strong dependence of existing fusion architectures on dense camera features, together with the filtering, association, and confidence-weighting mechanisms commonly applied to sparse radar measurements. These results demonstrate that sensor fusion does not inherently guarantee robustness and that the contribution and reliability of each sensing modality must be explicitly considered under adversarial conditions. Based on four empirical findings, we derive measurement-guided design implications for future robust camera--radar fusion, including modality-specific reliability estimation, cross-modal consistency checking, adaptive fusion, and graceful failover under severe sensor degradation.

Safe operation of autonomous vehicles in dense urban traffic depends on perception and planning that remain reliable when onboard sensing is degraded. In real driving conditions, camera observations are frequently corrupted by occlusion, motion blur, illumination change, and sensor noise, and when such degraded observations are aggregated indiscriminately over time, trajectory planning becomes unstable and collision risk rises for both the ego vehicle and surrounding road users. Recent Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) approaches unify perception and planning through a shared spatial representation, but most fuse temporal information across frames without assessing the reliability of the underlying observations. We present a Reliable Context-Aware and Temporal Planning framework for Autonomous Driving (RCT-AD) that explicitly models feature quality and temporal consistency to support safer, more consistent planning. A Reliable Context Awareness module scores per-frame reliability and selectively retains trustworthy features through a quality-gated First-In-Last-Out (FILO) memory mechanism, reconstructing degraded observations from reliable historical context so that corrupted inputs do not destabilize the scene representation. A Temporal Trajectory Planner captures long-term dependencies and multi-agent interactions to produce smoother, safety-aware trajectories, while a joint detection-and-segmentation head injects semantic and motion cues into the shared BEV space to strengthen scene understanding. Experiments on the nuScenes autonomous driving benchmark show that RCT-AD improves perception accuracy, motion prediction, and planning robustness over recent end-to-end baselines, achieving 61.5 nuScenes Detection Score, 52.9 mean Average Precision, and 52.3 mean Intersection over Union, while maintaining competitive computational efficiency suitable for real-time deployment.

LiDAR-based 3D object detection is a core perception service for autonomous driving, but deployment requires robustness to point-cloud corruption while meeting latency and memory requirements. Existing approaches address robustness and resource efficiency separately, resulting in compact detectors that are fragile under corruption or robust detectors that remain costly to deploy. We therefore formulate LiDAR perception provisioning as constructing a detector that remains accurate under point-cloud corruptions while meeting constraints on inference latency and peak GPU memory. To achieve robustness, we first craft corrupted samples that mimic extreme weather conditions. Then we train candidate detectors offline by ordering clean and corrupted samples by perturbation sensitivity, through which detectors learn more from hard corrupted samples. We estimate perturbation sensitivity using an ensemble of seven heterogeneous 3D detectors by tracking changes in confidence, BEV overlap, and unmatched detections. To improve efficiency, we narrow the network and use offline neighborhood-density measurements to determine how many points and neighbors each sampling stage processes. We evaluate our method using AP (Average Precision) under clean and corrupted conditions, inference latency, and peak allocated GPU memory. On KITTI for Car detection with PointRCNN, our method improves Moderate AP under corruption by 3.32 points over the original detector while reducing mean latency by 19.8% and peak allocated GPU memory by 53.9%. Across two datasets, two detector architectures, and three object classes, our method improves AP under corruption by 4.03 points on average over the corresponding original detectors, while reducing mean inference latency and peak allocated GPU memory by 14.4% and 38.0%, respectively. Our code is available at https://github.com/drunklibai/robust-efficient-lidar-perception.