cs.CVJun 10, 2026

From Nominal Intensity to Equivalent Rainfall: A Path-Based Credibility Evaluation Framework for Simulated Rainfall in Autonomous-Driving Perception Tests

Authors: Tian XiaXin ZhaoShaolingfeng YeJunyi Chen

Abstract

Credible simulated-rainfall conditions are essential for identifying perception-system boundaries and supporting SOTIF-oriented risk assessment in automated driving. However, closed-field tests are often described only by nominal rainfall intensity or single-point measurements, making it difficult to align simulated rain fields with real rainfall and map test results to real-world scenarios. This paper proposes a path-based credibility evaluation method for simulated rainfall in autonomous-driving perception tests. Using the drop size and velocity joint distribution of real rainfall as the reference, each candidate path is represented by path-equivalent rainfall intensity, an uncertainty band, and a path-averaged Realism of Raindrop Distribution (RRD) score. Lidar target point-cloud count and mean reflectivity are further used for perception-consistency correction, quantifying the proxy capability of each simulated-rainfall path for real-rainfall perception effects. Experiments are conducted using about 10,000 real-rainfall raindrop-spectrum samples, 728 RainSense perception samples, and 45 spatial sampling points in a 2.4 m x 7.2 m simulated-rainfall area. Results show that spatial non-uniformity remains under the same nominal condition, confirming the need for path-based evaluation. The method identifies Path IV and Path VI as preferable candidates, with results of 11.54 +/- 0.31 mm/h, RRD = 0.43, and 8.28 +/- 0.34 mm/h, RRD = 0.46, respectively. These paths show more balanced performance in rainfall-intensity stability, raindrop-spectrum realism, and perception consistency. The proposed method supports path selection, condition description, and credible interpretation of autonomous-driving perception tests under rainfall.

Explore similar work

Aug 3, 2026cs.CV

GSRAIN: Physically Calibrated High-/Low-Frequency Rainfall Synthesis for 3D Gaussian Driving Scenes

Existing rainfall simulation methods for autonomous driving remain limited in physical controllability and multi-view consistency. This paper presents GSRAIN, a high-/low-frequency rainfall synthesis method for 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) driving scenes. GSRAIN constructs a high-frequency raindrop model from measured rainfall data and generates low-frequency rainy appearance using a geometry-aware single-step diffusion model. The two effects are then fused in a unified 3DGS scene, enabling rainfall-intensity control over the range of 0--13~mm/h. The proposed method achieves a Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) of 149.09, outperforming CycleGAN-Turbo (155.71) and WeatherEdit (157.94). Object-detection and closed-loop driving experiments further show that the generated scenes expose scene-dependent performance changes of the evaluated algorithms under controllable rainfall. These results indicate that GSRAIN provides an effective approach for constructing physically controllable, repeatable, and closed-loop-compatible rainy-weather test scenes for autonomous driving.
Fanyu Wang, Longgao Zhang, Junyi Chen
Jun 5, 2026cs.RO

A Causal Probabilistic Framework for Perception-Informed Closed-Loop Simulation of Autonomous Driving

Software-in-the-loop (SIL) simulation is a cornerstone for the validation of modern automotive safety functions. However, many current frameworks utilize ideal sensing, which bypasses the functional insufficiencies of perception algorithms, leading to over-optimistic safety assessments. This paper proposes a perception-informed SIL testing methodology that bridges the gap between ground-truth simulation and real-world perception behavior. We present a framework for incorporating causal probabilistic models into standardized, scenario-based simulation toolchains, applicable to both Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS). Our approach enables the systematic injection of realistic perception errors, such as loss of detection, sizing inaccuracies, and positioning offsets, derived from physical triggering conditions like fog, rain, and object-merging scenarios. By evaluating these ``faults'' within a standardized simulation environment, we demonstrate that perception-informed testing reveals latent operational risks that ideal SIL environments fail to capture, providing a scalable pathway for SOTIF (ISO 21448) validation.
Zhennan Fei, Rickard Johansson, Mikael Andersson +12
Sep 3, 2026cs.RO

Virtual Testing of Automated Driving Systems through Credible Simulations

Simulation is increasingly used to support safety-related decision-making in road transport, particularly for the assessment and approval of automated driving systems (ADS). The complexity of ADS behavior and size of their operational design domains make exclusive reliance on physical testing impractical, leading to extensive use of virtual testing (VT) during the approval phase. This shift raises critical questions regarding the credibility of modelling and simulation (M&S) results used to support road safety decisions. Current VT accreditation approaches in the ADS domain typically rely on validation-only practices, which have been shown to scale poorly when applied to complex, multi-tool simulation environments. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a risk-based framework for assessing the credibility of simulation toolchains used in ADS safety evaluation, drawing inspiration from established practices in other safety-critical domains, notably NASA's STD-7009 for models and simulations. The framework extends traditional verification and validation (V&V) by explicitly linking credibility requirements to the intended use of simulation outputs and to the safety criticality of the decisions they support within the approval process. It provides a lifecycle-oriented assessment scheme integrating toolchain management, modelling assumptions and limitations, verification, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Credibility acceptance thresholds are defined proportionally, allowing differentiated requirements depending on whether simulation is used for exploratory safety analysis, partial decision support, or as a substitute for physical testing. While demonstrated for ADS, the proposed approach is directly applicable to road safety and simulation studies where VT plays a central role in safety assessment and regulatory decision-making.
Riccardo Dona, Espedito Rusciano, Biagio Ciuffo