Mesh Inference: A Formal Model of Collective Inference Without a Center

Hongwei Xu

cs.MAJun 17, 2026

Mesh Inference: A Formal Model of Collective Inference Without a Center

Authors: Hongwei Xu

Abstract

We present a formal model of mesh inference: how a population of independent agents, each holding private state and exchanging only admitted, typed observations, derives a conclusion none of them holds alone, with no central coordinator and no agent exposed. No agent shares weights, gradients, or hidden state, and the agents may span different teams, networks, and organizations. Motivated by the observation that asking a model is energy-minimizing inference, we model the mesh as a coupled free energy that each agent relaxes locally. We show that a single admission/emission policy governs three properties. First, mesh inference converges to a unique answer for any admission, symmetric or not, because the coupling is always an M-matrix. Second, it is identification-complete: it derives the centralized optimum exactly when the contributing views are carrier-connected. Third, it is observation-only: no node transmits its internals, and confidentiality is the dual of identification. Content-addressed lineage is the only global side-channel. In the linear-Gaussian regime every derived answer is determined, hence equal to the centralized optimum, at O(diam^2) latency, the measured price of removing the center. One such derivation is one turn of a center-free learning loop, which we formalize as architecture rather than prove. The open problem we state is when asking improves the collective rather than corrupting it: whether the non-linear closure derives an upgraded answer or a confident error. To our knowledge, this is the first formal characterization of when a center-free, observation-only mesh recovers the centralized optimum.

Explore similar work

Jun 25, 2026cs.LG

On the Necessity of a Liquid Substrate for Mesh Intelligence

A mesh of sovereign agents has no center: no shared clock, no shared model, and no coordinator to gather data or retrain. Its competence rests on each agent folding the projections its peers emit into a single internal state, online, from observations that arrive at irregular, unscheduled times, on a substrate whose weights it cannot retrain. Any one of these constraints is tractable on its own; folding optimally under all three at once is not. We ask what such a substrate must be, and prove two necessary conditions from one model of a self-evolving latent observed at irregular, exogenous times. Because the latent changes, its optimal estimator is time-varying: an adaptive timescale is necessary, and every fixed-gain filter is strictly suboptimal. And because arrivals are clock-free, the optimal estimate depends on the elapsed gap between them, which no gap-blind network recovers at any width or depth. This second condition is capacity-independent: scale cannot substitute for the missing dependence. The two conditions intersect in the continuous-time liquid class. An LSTM satisfies the first, a fixed continuous-time filter the second, and a multi-timescale liquid network both. Synthetic experiments confirm each: the network attains the timescale, and the separation is computed exactly. The characterization is necessary, not sufficient, and binds fixed-weight substrates: a network free to retrain reaches the class by other means. Proved per agent, the necessity binds every agent of a mesh, a structural condition on mesh intelligence.

Hongwei Xu

Networked Systems Strategic Agents Adaptive Learning Low-Latency Systems Self-Evolution Meshes

Ask PDF

May 12, 2026cs.AI

Why Conclusions Diverge from the Same Observations: Formalizing World-Model Non-Identifiability via an Inference

When people share the same documents and observations yet reach different conclusions, the disagreement often shifts into a judgment that the other party is cognitively defective, irrational, or acting in bad faith. This paper argues that such divergence is better described as a form of non-identifiability inherent in inference and learning, rather than as a defect of the other party. We organize the phenomenon into two levels: (i)

θ

-level non-identifiability, where conclusions diverge under the same world model

W

because inference settings differ; and (ii)

W

-level non-identifiability, where repeated use of an inference setting

θ

biases data exposure and update rules, causing the learned world model

W

itself to diverge. We introduce an inference profile

θ= (R, E, S, D)

, consisting of Reference, Exploration, Stabilization, and Horizon, and show how outputs can split even for the same observation

o

and the same

W

. We further explain why disagreements tend to project onto a small number of bases -- abstract versus concrete, externalizability, and order versus freedom -- as a consequence of general constraints on learning systems: computational, observational, and coordination constraints. Finally, we relate the framework to deep representation learning, including representation hierarchy, latent-state estimation, and regularization-exploration trade-offs, and illustrate the framework through a case study on AI regulation debates.

Toru Takahashi

Identifiability Disagreement Divergence Observation State Estimation

Ask PDF

Sep 7, 2026cs.IT

A Fundamental Limit in Decentralized Decision-Making

In decentralized decision-making, several agents connected according to a network graph aim at solving a classification problem by collecting streaming observations. Due to decentralization, they run an iterative algorithm where, at each iteration, they can only exchange information locally with their neighbors. While decentralized estimation solutions have been shown to match the performance of optimal centralized systems, we show here that surprisingly this conclusion does not hold for decentralized decision-making. Specifically, we prove that the error probability for the best decentralized decision strategy exhibits an irreducible loss with respect to the optimal centralized classifier. This result establishes a fundamental limit for the performance of any decentralized decision strategy. We obtain an analytical relation showing that this limit is related to the interplay between decentralization and classification. The first aspect appears through the distances between the nodes in the graph, while the second aspect plays through the moment generating functions of the likelihood ratios that describe the decision problem. By applying the derived closed-form relation to different network topologies and inference problems, we observe some interesting and perhaps unexpected behavior emerging. In particular, we characterize the scaling law (with the network size) for the loss over popular network topologies, showing that the error probabilities might differ by orders of magnitude; and we examine how performance is affected by the relative distance between informative and uninformative agents over the graph.

Marco Carpentiero, Felice Scala, Vincenzo Matta +1

Decentralization Complex Networks Decisions Equal Error Rate

Ask PDF