eess.SYAug 10, 2026

Trajectory-Induced Self-Calibration for Hidden-Target Localization Through an Unknown-Pose Range-Bearing Relay

Authors: Yash Bagla

Organizations: Michigan State University

Abstract

This paper studies hidden-target localization from range-bearing packets reported by a relay beacon whose global position and yaw are unknown. The vehicle knows its own trajectory but never directly senses the target; the relay packet contains only local-frame range and bearing to the vehicle and to the hidden target. Unlike bearing-only network localization, relative-frame localization, and target-enclosing control, the target is neither directly observed in the vehicle frame nor treated as a node in a relative-sensing graph. The main result characterizes the minimal motion that removes the resulting calibration ambiguity: one vehicle pose leaves a continuous yaw/translation/target gauge, whereas two distinct vehicle-relative observations from one unknown-pose relay constructively determine relay yaw (modulo 2 pi), relay position, and the anchored target in the noiseless case. A local rank corollary, a shared-target multi-beacon extension, and a trajectory-spread conditioning lemma connect relay self-calibration to finite-window excitation and native range-bearing estimation. In Monte Carlo evaluation the estimator recovers the hidden target with 5.5 mm RMSE, five times below the 30 mm per-packet range noise and thirteen times more accurate than a naive EKF baseline; it converges to the same accuracy from 2 m target offsets and 2.4 rad yaw errors, and Huber weighting preserves millimeter accuracy under 10% outlier corruption that drops the unprotected estimator to a 0.10 success rate. Trajectory spread predicts estimator quality: the two weakly excited trajectories carry condition numbers above 100 with success rates of 0.82 and 0.70, while every well-excited trajectory attains full success.

Explore similar work

Aug 12, 2026eess.SY

Excitation-Supervised Closed-Loop Self-Calibration and Target Seeking for an Unknown-Pose Range-Bearing Relay

A vehicle seeking a hidden target through a range-bearing relay of unknown position and yaw must decide, online, whether its own motion has already made the relay calibration trustworthy, and what to do when it has not. Two distinct vehicle-relative observations are known to remove the calibration gauge and make the target's relay-local packet globally actionable (arXiv:2608.09464), but that statement is static: it classifies a stored window only after the fact. This paper supplies the closed-loop layer: we show that the trajectory-spread margin SvS_v that governs identifiability is simultaneously a finite-noise seed-accuracy bound, a local-vector variance decomposition, and a circle-geometry excitation budget, and we use it to supervise an excitation-reset controller. An excitation-supervised algorithm retriggers exploratory motion whenever the spread certificate is insufficient, projecting the target-seeking input away from the excitation's push, and otherwise proceeds to unrestricted target seeking. Under explicit sampling assumptions the supervision rule provably acquires any required excitation in finite time; in the noiseless local regime with positive excitation decay, estimator convergence yields target-seeking convergence after certification; and the threshold is selected from a desired calibration-accuracy level rather than chosen heuristically. Closed-loop simulation, paired Monte Carlo comparisons, a spread-threshold ablation, and a ROS 2/Gazebo software-in-the-loop experiment with sensing delay validate the approach. A decay-rate sweep shows that supervision matters when a fixed schedule's decay outruns the unknown time-to-adequate-excitation: over 100 paired trials the fixed baseline's yaw RMSE rises from 0.010 to 0.065 rad and success falls to 56%, while target-tracking error remains insensitive; supervision keeps yaw RMSE between 0.0095 and 0.0191 rad with 100% success.
Yash Bagla
Jul 19, 2026cs.CV

PACE: Polar Axis-Conditioned Estimation for PairUAV Relative Localization

PairUAV relative localization maps two UAV images to a polar navigation command. Although heading and range share the same pairwise pose context, treating them as homogeneous coordinates forces both outputs to use the same decoder evidence and optimization state. Controlled readout probes reveal a different structure: the two axes favor different decoder-depth combinations, their best checkpoints disagree on 80.8% of a validation trajectory, and range errors exhibit a distinct high-error tail. We introduce method, Polar Axis-Conditioned Estimation, which retains a shared Reloc3r-style pair representation while assigning axis-specific readout interfaces. Heading uses mid/late relational evidence, whereas range remains attached to a direct late metric path. On the official hidden test, the strongest released raw predictor scores 0.002460; the complementary PAAER predictor scores 0.002514 with a slightly lower angle error. Deterministic challenge packaging, reported separately from learned estimation, yields the final score of 0.001874. Code, checkpoints, predictions, and reconstruction tools are available at https://github.com/zerong7777-boop/PairUAV-PACE.
Ze Rong
May 7, 2026cs.RO

Dr-BA: Separable Optimization for Direct Radar Bundle Adjustment & Localization

This paper introduces Dr-BA, a first-of-its-kind radar bundle adjustment (BA) framework that operates directly on 2D spinning radar intensity images. Unlike camera or lidar sensors, radar is largely unaffected by precipitation, making it a critical modality for autonomous systems that require all-weather robustness. Existing state estimation approaches using spinning radar typically extract sparse point clouds from range-azimuth-intensity measurements and apply point cloud alignment techniques to estimate vehicle motion, scene structure, or to localize within an existing map. In contrast, Dr-BA uses the full radar returns from multiple scans to jointly estimate dense maps and sensor poses. By formulating the problem as a separable optimization, we derive an efficient and general solution that decouples pose estimation from mapping. In addition to solving the BA problem, this formulation naturally extends to direct radar-only localization (DRL) within a previously built map. Dr-BA achieves state-of-the-art radar-based BA and cross-session localization performance, demonstrated on more than 200 km of on-road data across five distinct routes. Our implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/utiasASRL/dr_ba.
Daniil Lisus, Cedric Le Gentil, Timothy D. Barfoot