NRCD: An Open Database of Collegiate Running with Unified Performance Standardization

Structured tabular data dominates clinical medicine, yet existing benchmarks fail to reflect real-world properties like complex survey sampling, demographic oversampling, and subgroup fairness. We introduce the NHANES Accelerometry Cardiometabolic Benchmark, derived from NHANES 2003-2006, comprising 1,381 adults with hip-worn accelerometry, fasting laboratory biomarkers, dietary intake, and anthropometrics. We evaluate three tabular learning methods -- ridge regression, XGBoost, and the foundation model TabPFN v2 -- to predict glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting triglycerides, and C-reactive protein (CRP) from activity phenotypes and lifestyle covariates. TabPFN v2 achieves the best overall performance (HbA1c R^2=0.156, CRP R^2=0.383), while triglycerides remain largely unpredictable (R^2 < 0.05), consistent with known genetic dominance. We apply split conformal prediction to generate distribution-free 90% prediction intervals and evaluate demographic coverage equity across sex and race/ethnicity subgroups. Marginal coverage aligns with the 90% target for CRP and HbA1c but falls below for triglycerides. At the subgroup level, we observe localized undercoverage (e.g., HbA1c for Mexican American participants), illustrating the gap between marginal guarantees and the conditional coverage required for clinical fairness. Code and data are at https://github.com/felizzi/nhanes-accel-cardiometabolic-benchmark.

Research in CDCR remains fragmented due to heterogeneous dataset formats, varying annotation standards, and the predominance of the CDCR definition as the event coreference resolution (ECR). To address these challenges, we introduce uCDCR, a unified dataset that consolidates diverse publicly available English CDCR corpora across various domains into a consistent format, which we analyze with standardized metrics and evaluation protocols. uCDCR incorporates both entity and event coreference, corrects known inconsistencies, and enriches datasets with missing attributes to facilitate reproducible research. We establish a cohesive framework for fair, interpretable, and cross-dataset analysis in CDCR and compare the datasets on their lexical properties, e.g., lexical composition of the annotated mentions, lexical diversity and ambiguity metrics, discuss the annotation rules and principles that lead to high lexical diversity, and examine how these metrics influence performance on the same-head-lemma baseline. Our dataset analysis shows that ECB+, the state-of-the-art benchmark for CDCR, has one of the lowest lexical diversities, and its CDCR complexity, measured by the same-head-lemma baseline, lies in the middle among all uCDCR datasets. Moreover, comparing document and mention distributions between ECB+ and uCDCR shows that using all uCDCR datasets for model training and evaluation will improve the generalizability of CDCR models. Finally, the almost identical performance on the same-head-lemma baseline, separately applied to events and entities, shows that resolving both types is a complex task and should not be steered toward ECR alone. The uCDCR dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/AnZhu/uCDCR, and the code for parsing, analyzing, and scoring the dataset is available at https://github.com/anastasia-zhukova/uCDCR.

Each run of an AI-driven research system (ADRS) is an expensive search over a vast solution space, and dependable evaluation requires many runs, making run data both costly to produce and valuable to retain for large-scale analysis. Yet this data remains fragmented: teams operate in isolation, ADRS frameworks emit results in different formats, and no shared infrastructure exists to aggregate or compare runs across problems and systems. We present ROAR, a solution for systematically unifying and analyzing heterogeneous ADRS outputs. ROAR addresses two challenges: reconciling heterogeneous ADRS outputs and enabling analytics across runs with different objectives and scoring functions. We achieve this through a relational schema and parsing layer that normalize heterogeneous ADRS outputs while preserving data lineage and temporal structure, and accommodating new systems without requiring schema modifications. From building a corpus of more than 900 runs from multiple ADRS, we show how pooled data can reveal properties of problem landscapes that are difficult to observe. Consistent with prior work, runs with identical configurations may converge to different scores. We find that many runs realize most gains early, and that the effectiveness of different strategies for incorporating prior solutions into the search process varies across problems. We further show that the pooled corpus is actionable and not merely analytical by using ROAR to configure ADRS runs. Together, these results illustrate how pooled ADRS data can expose problem-dependent structure in search behavior that is difficult to detect from any single system, team, or benchmark. Such cross-cutting insights are difficult to obtain while runs remain siloed; ROAR is the first infrastructure designed to unify them.