Organizations: Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Key Laboratory of Target Cognition and Application Technology (TCAT) · School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Baidu Inc.
Continuous aerial search builds target hypotheses from sparse, viewpoint-dependent observations. When later evidence contradicts a stored hypothesis, however, the candidate can remain available to the planner and continue triggering approach or verification actions. We call this trajectory-level failure false candidate persistence (FCP). We equip SkyAgent with Revisable Target Memory (RTM), which associates evidence with persistent candidates, discounts correlated views, and revises each candidate through Tentative, Confirmed, and Rejected states. The key interface binds every generated waypoint to its source candidate: rejection therefore invalidates stale goals, while conservative reactivation protects temporarily occluded targets. Across four splits from the CityAVOS, UAV-ON, and OpenUAV benchmarks, our SkyAgent equipped with RTM outperforms all competitors, improving SR by 2.90--6.31 points while substantially reducing Behavior-FCP and post-contradiction travel with a low false-rejection rate. Across 35 matched real-world DJI scenarios per method, RTM consistently improves task success and behavioral reliability, further validating its state-to-action correction under physical deployment conditions.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: False candidate persistence in continuous aerial search. A static distractor looks like the target from an early viewpoint ( A ) and is contradicted by an independent later view ( B ). An append-only state keeps C1 active; the drone wastes route on a known-wrong candidate ( C , top). RTM rejects C1 , cancels its pending waypoint, and resumes search toward the true target without erasing the audit trail ( C , bottom).
Figure 2: Revisable Target Memory. Candidate Evidence Memory groups sequential observations by independent viewpoint and accumulates signed evidence for each persistent candidate. Revise-and-Suppress updates each candidate’s lifecycle through a state-dependent transition and propagates rejection to the planner by invalidating every pending waypoint sourced from the rejected candidate.
Benchmark
Method
SR ↑
Eff. ↑
Dist. ↓
BFCPR ↓
Waste ↓
FRR ↓
CityAVOS-Hard (SkyAgent n=380 )
RE ( Ji et al. 2026 )
5.05
2.47
674.16
N/A
N/A
N/A
FBE ( Ji et al. 2026 )
8.07
6.34
628.70
N/A
N/A
N/A
STMR ( Ji et al. 2026 )
20.96
13.23
547.77
N/A
N/A
N/A
PRPSearcher (Hard subset) ( Ji et al. 2026 )
29.62
16.65
507.60
N/A
N/A
N/A
Append-only SkyAgent
33.95
23.16
431.13
45.18
120.76
N/A
SkyAgent + RTM (Hard)
40.26
30.14
349.14
15.27
44.21
2.91
Table 1: Performance on aerial benchmarks. SkyAgent rows are paired internal comparisons. External SR and Eff. values are reported by the cited papers; Dist. values are outputs of our benchmark reproduction rather than values copied from their tables. External methods may use different perception front ends. SR, Eff., BFCPR, and FRR are percentages; Dist. and Waste are meters.
Figure 3: Mechanism audit layout. Panel A contrasts append-only and RTM trajectories after the reference contradiction at t⋆ . Panel B aligns signed evidence, candidate state, and stale-goal cancellation. Panel C defines the distance-quartile summary used for the supplementary stress analysis.
Variant
SR ↑
SFCPR ↓
BFCPR ↓
Waste ↓
FRR ↓
ORR ↑
Latency ↓
Append-only
33.95
55.33
45.18
120.76
–
77.08
–
Verify current action
36.05
50.25
38.19
96.17
1.96
80.21
6.53
RTM w/o negative evidence
35.53
51.24
39.80
103.18
0.99
82.29
7.29
RTM w/o viewpoint grouping
37.63
27.23
21.29
60.92
8.65
77.08
2.37
Revision state only
38.42
19.90
28.86
74.24
3.88
89.58
8.72
Permanent rejection
38.68
15.42
12.44
38.26
11.65
65.63
2.52
Table 2: Mechanism ablations on CityAVOS-Hard ( n=380 ). Closed-loop rates use row-specific externally annotated events; the shared-stream analysis and all event counts are reported separately. Waste is meters and Latency is steps.
Figure 4: Representative real-flight revision sequence. Inspection rejects C1 and cancels its queued waypoint; search resumes toward C2 , confirmed from an independent view. Table 3 reports all paired trials.
Method
SR ↑
Dist. ↓
BFCPR ↓
FRR ↓
Rev.Lat.(s) ↓
Int. ↓
SPF (TF)
54.29
275.68
50.00
12.50
6.31
17.14
PSC-AVDN (TF)
60.00
257.94
40.91
16.67
5.24
11.43
Append-only SkyAgent
57.14
264.37
45.45
–
–
14.29
SkyAgent + RTM
71.43
223.81
13.64
4.17
2.78
5.71
Table 3: Matched DJI flights. Results use 35 matched scenarios/method (140 trials). Rates are percentages, Dist. is meters, and Rev.Lat. is seconds; TF denotes no task-specific training or fine-tuning.
Aerial robotics studies the design, perception, control, and coordination of flying robots for navigation, inspection, transport, and physical interaction.
Efficient exploration and target search in large-scale unknown environments remain challenging for aerial robots due to the demands of broad spatial coverage, fine-grained perception, and real-time decision-making. This paper presents SLIDER, a lightweight and memory-efficient framework that avoids reliance on globally dense maps by combining a local sliding map with sparse global history information. A novel observation quality evaluation method is proposed, leveraging historical poses and sensor models to assess point cloud data in real-time, enabling efficient frontier detection. To support scalable and responsive planning, an incremental viewpoint clustering strategy dynamically adapts to local updates, significantly reducing the number of candidate targets and decreasing computational load. A sparse global topological map is incrementally maintained to assist global planning and cost evaluation. Extensive simulations and real-world experiments demonstrate that the proposed system outperforms state-of-the-art methods in memory usage, decision latency, and search efficiency.
Robust geo-localization under changing environmental and operational conditions is critical for long-term aerial autonomy. Aerial visual place recognition (VPR) commonly uses pre-acquired remote-sensing imagery of the intended operating area, so the geographic label space can remain fixed while successive airborne missions introduce substantial visual distribution shifts. Continual adaptation to these shifts can cause catastrophic forgetting. We therefore formulate aerial VPR as a mission-based domain-incremental learning (DIL) problem and develop a heterogeneous memory framework. Before sequential adaptation, the satellite reference dataset is used once to train the initial model and construct a static satellite exemplar memory; a bounded replay buffer then retains selected airborne observations across missions. For replay management, we compare loss- and diversity-based selection criteria and introduce DBS-Hybrid, which combines prototype-based diversity trimming with representative-first feature-space coverage. Experiments on 21 visible and infrared UAV missions evaluate generalization to held-out missions, immediate adaptation, and knowledge retention. Under the primary Forward mission order, DBS-Hybrid achieves the highest mean final average accuracy, generalization, and knowledge retention among the evaluated methods, improving over the Random baseline by 5.06, 5.32, and 6.33 percentage points, respectively, and improving backward transfer from -6.41% to 1.07%. Across five additional random mission orders, DBS-Hybrid ranks second in mean final average accuracy, backward transfer, generalization, and knowledge retention. Overall, heterogeneous memory and diversity-aware replay provide an effective basis for continual aerial VPR in mapped operating areas.
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) searching for ground targets from a high altitude face a unique challenge, particularly when the target is already within the field of view but effectively unobservable because of its small apparent scale. Standard object detectors often underperform in such scenarios because of resolution downscaling and limited context. In contrast, active object search frameworks address this challenge by directing the agent to a suitable pose to gather richer visual information. However, flight regulations in urban airspace often restrict such physical movements for UAVs. As an alternative active sensing approach, the UAV can leverage the pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) mechanism of the onboard camera to dynamically adjust its field of view and sequentially gather enhanced visual information from specific regions of interest. Once the candidate locations of the target are identified, it can deploy more expensive object detection schemes, such as an ensemble of multiple models, to get better reasoning at a fixed scale. In this work, we formulate the sequential exploration with PTZ operation as a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), in which the agent maintains a belief state over the target's true location. To solve the POMDP, we deploy partially observable Monte Carlo planning (POMCP), where we condition the sensing reliability on target object scale and deploy selective ensemble detection as an additional reasoning step. We validate our methodology with experiments in a photorealistic simulator under different environmental conditions and vehicle states, showing detection of ground targets at variable scales with significantly fewer steps and minimal dependence on sensor resolution compared to baseline methods.
Ashik E Rasul, Hyung-Jin Yoon
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Tennessee Technological University Cookeville, USA