Search research

Multi-agent collaborative filtering (CF) systems coordinate autonomous LLM-powered user and item agents through natural-language interaction to refine preferences and generate recommendations. These systems inherit vulnerabilities from both their data-driven nature and their multi-agent interactions, which manifest in distinct ways. Understanding how connectivity modulates vulnerability in these systems could facilitate the development of more robust recommendation pipelines. In this work, we adapt attacks and defenses from the general multi-agent systems (MAS) literature to the agent-based CF setting, evaluating them under systematically varied connectivity in the AgentCF framework, where CF connectivity is characterized along two axes: (i) candidate count (the number of item candidates per turn per user, measuring user-side interaction density) and (ii) catalog concentration (the degree of item catalog overlap across users). Our contributions include: (1) Adaptation: we reproduce MAS-inspired attacks and defenses in the agentic CF domain, confirming partial transferability of original observations. (2) Characterization: we characterize how the two aspects of connectivity shape attack and defense outcomes, revealing role asymmetries between user and item agents, non-monotonic temporal dynamics in attack efficacy, and divergent patterns across dissemination and extraction attack goals. Additionally, as an exploratory extension, we assess the applicability of epidemic-inspired static metrics in ranking CF configurations by expected attack outcome, potentially enabling cost-efficient robustness assessment. Implementation is available at https://github.com/anjunhu/ConnACF

The emergence of the recent outstanding capabilities of Arabic Language Models has opened doors for exposing their vulnerabilities. One of the major security risks associated with such Natural Language Processing models is adversarial attacks. These attacks can deceive the model into the wrong prediction, raising critical model security and safety concerns. This study aims to assess the robustness of five state-of-the-art Arabic Language Models under a distinct set of Arabic adversarial attacks applied at various levels of granularity and using different example generation strategies. We also explore a defense technique based on adversarial training to enhance model robustness. The results show that insertion of diacritics can reduce the accuracy of some models by 92% while maintaining a low perturbation distance. For word-level attacks, manipulating Arabic conjunctions preserves high semantic similarity scores, low perturbation distance, and leads to an accuracy degradation of up to 58%. For sentence-level attacks, paraphrasing proves its effectiveness by an average reduction of 76% in the victim models' performance. While adversarial training improves overall resilience, with MARBERT being the most robust and AraBERT showing the greatest relative gains, challenges persist, particularly against character-level noise. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of current defense strategies in morphologically rich languages like Arabic.

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have shown impressive generalization, but often lack interpretability and can struggle to follow precise natural language instructions that encode spatial, temporal, and logical requirements. We propose a hierarchical framework that uses Signal Temporal Logic (STL) as a shared representation connecting high-level language understanding with low-level robot execution. A high-level policy leverages a VLM to decompose language instructions into high-level subtasks, generate STL specifications for each subtask, and choose a low-level policy for executing each subtask. The STL specifications translate language-derived intent into precise constraints, and the low-level policy selection determines whether those constraints are enforced directly through STL-guided model-predictive control or monitored during execution of a learned policy for perceptually complex, or contact-rich behaviors. By integrating STL into plan validation, low-level policy, subtask monitoring, and replanning, our framework enables language-derived plans to be checked, optimized, and revised at runtime using a common formal structure. We evaluate the approach on a real-world tabletop domain, demonstrating how formal specifications can improve the precision, reliability, and interpretability of language-conditioned robot planning.

Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), are driving robotic architectures toward agent-based high-level orchestration, in which natural-language instructions can be translated into context-aware action sequences. While the integration of these agents and robotic capabilities is increasingly converging toward standardization through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), the upper Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) layer remains fragmented by proprietary, ad hoc interfaces that hinder real-time human-in-the-loop collaboration. To address this fragmentation, this paper proposes the adoption of the Agent-Client Protocol (ACP) -- a communication standard originally introduced for coding agents in software engineering -- as a unified communication contract for the HRI layer in agent-based robotic systems. By combining ACP at the interface-agent link and MCP at the agent-execution link, we formulate a fully decoupled three-layer architecture that separates human interaction, deliberative orchestration, and physical execution. This topology removes rigid architectural dependencies, enabling heterogeneous user interfaces to connect to the same robotic system and allowing the underlying robotic platform to be replaced without requiring client-specific integration changes. Moreover, it provides native support for collaborative HRI capabilities such as real-time observability, explicit human authorization, and immediate task interruption. We experimentally evaluate the proposed architecture on a physical mobile robot, demonstrating interoperability across three heterogeneous user interfaces and validating real-time human-in-the-loop workflows with negligible latency overhead.

The analysis of satellite and aerial imagery has entered a new era with the advent of foundation models. This paper describes the concept of Geospatial Foundation Models (GeoFMs), which are artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) models pre-trained on massive geospatial datasets through varied methodologies. We first articulate the core paradigm shift that GeoFMs enable: a separation of duties, where large-scale model providers perform the computationally intensive pretraining, allowing domain experts to rapidly fine-tune or prompt these models for specific, mission-critical tasks. This approach democratizes access to state-of-the-art AI/ML while maintaining the security and confidentiality of the downstream task. We then explore the novel capabilities unlocked by different types of GeoFMs, distinguishing between the finetunable vision models produced by self-supervised techniques like masked auto-encoding, and the vision-language models produced by contrastive learning which enable zero-shot tasks like open-vocabulary image analysis. Next, we discuss the practical considerations for operationalizing GeoFMs, from performance-cost analysis to the broader MLOps ecosystem. To that end, we introduce a taxonomy of model adaptation strategies and propose a framework for domain experts to select the most cost-effective adaptation approach for their particular mission set. Finally, we present a forward-looking vision of Agentic Geospatial Reasoning, where Large Language Models act as intelligent orchestrators, leveraging GeoFMs as tools to answer high-level user queries in natural language and automate complex analytical workflows, moving the field from perception to cognition.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in mathematical reasoning, they frequently produce subtle errors that evade human detection. Formal mathematical languages like Lean 4 offer mechanical proof checking, strongly motivating the need for autoformalization: the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into verifiable code. Recent trends indicate that general-purpose LLMs, heavily optimized for standard programming, now outperform smaller models explicitly fine-tuned for Lean. Leveraging this shift, we introduce an agentic autoformalization framework powered by general coding LLMs. At the core of our system is an orchestrator that manages a multi-agent pipeline tailored for research-level mathematics. Because cutting-edge research frequently relies on concepts outside the scope of existing libraries like Mathlib, our system dynamically extends necessary type definitions and validates them via a novel Auxiliary Lemma technique before formalizing the primary theorems. We applied our approach to PutnamBench, producing machine-checked Lean proofs for a random sample of 32 problems. Furthermore, we evaluate our system on five papers from the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) spanning combinatorics, communication complexity, mechanism design, and learning theory, successfully formalizing their main theorems and validating the generated formalizations with human experts; for all five we also formalize the proofs alongside the statements, and notably two of them are proved with no axioms beyond Lean's kernel. All of our formalizations are available at https://beyondthelibrary.github.io/formal_arxiv .

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) and brain signal understanding are pivotal for clinical health and next-generation interactions. Despite this significance, its widespread adoption in real-world scenarios remains restricted, primarily because current analytical paradigms lack sufficient agentic intelligence. First, existing methodologies impose prohibitive technical barriers, requiring extensive specialized expertise. Second, they remain inherently static and task-specific, failing to execute the complex, long-horizon workflows essential for real-world deployment. To accelerate the democratization of brain signal understanding, we draw inspiration from Large Language Models (LLMs) to introduce BrainAgent, an LLM-driven multi-agent framework designed to ground abstract natural language intent into rigorous, executable, and end-to-end processing pipelines. BrainAgent employs a hierarchical architecture where a central supervisor orchestrates specialized sub-agents for adaptive task decomposition and execution. Furthermore, we establish a comprehensive, systematic benchmark for evaluating agentic systems in brain signal analysis. Empirical results demonstrate that BrainAgent effectively automates complex workflows with superior reliability, marking a paradigm shift toward democratized brain signal understanding.

Spaceborne inspection systems often deploy perception models prior to launch, after which updating model weights or expanding fixed label sets becomes operationally impractical. While supervised models can be integrated pre-flight, adding new semantic capabilities in orbit requires retraining and re-uploading parameters. We investigate whether prompt-driven vision--language models can enable post-launch semantic expansion, allowing new spacecraft components to be specified via natural-language prompts without modifying onboard weights. We evaluate zero-shot instance segmentation of spacecraft components under a strictly frozen, single-pass inference protocol on a test set of $129$ images of previously unseen satellites. Under fixed global thresholds and no post-processing, SAM3 achieves $0.385$ mAP@$0.5$ and $0.267$ mAP@$0.5{:}0.95$. Performance is strongly scale-dependent: large structural elements like spacecraft bodies ($0.639$ AP@$0.50$) and solar arrays ($0.598$ AP@$0.5$) localize reliably, while relatively small appendages like antennas ($0.221$ AP@$0.5$) and thrusters ($0.081$ AP@$0.5$) remain difficult. Prompt formulation influences performance, with structured prompts incorporating spatial and geometric descriptors yielding up to $82$ improvement over short category-name prompts. The model operates within the memory and compute envelope of contemporary embedded GPUs, suggesting prompt-driven grounding can provide a practical mechanism for post-launch semantic extension of dominant spacecraft structures while highlighting limitations of zero-shot localization for fine-scale components under orbital domain shift.

Vision-language segmentation models have recently achieved strong performance by leveraging high-level semantic object categories expressed in natural language. However, this semantic dependence limits their ability to reason about intrinsic visual properties such as shape, geometry, or texture, which are essential in many real-world applications. In this work, we introduce Semantic-Agnostic aNd Shape-Aware (SANSA) segmentation, a new paradigm that requires segmentation models to operate solely from non-semantic textual descriptions. To this end, we propose two strategies to generate SANSA segmentation prompts based on either dictionary constraints or example guidance, both generating semantic-agnostic textual descriptions. These prompts are then used to finetune segmentation models under semantic-agnostic supervision. Experiments show that finetuning on SANSA prompts yields up to a 20% mIoU improvement on this new segmentation task, compared to pretrained state-of-the-art models, while maintaining strong performance on standard semantic prompts. These results highlight the importance of low- and mid-level visual reasoning for improving the generalization and controllability of vision-language segmentation models.

Deploying neural networks on microcontroller units (MCUs) is critical for edge intelligence but remains challenging due to tight memory, storage, and computation constraints. Existing approaches, such as model compression and hardware-aware neural architecture search (HW-NAS), often depend on proxy metrics, incur high search cost, and do not fully bridge the gap between architecture design and verified deployment. This paper presents AutoMCU, a feasibility-first large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent system for automated neural network customization under MCU constraints. Given natural-language task requirements and hardware specifications, AutoMCU iteratively generates structured architecture candidates, filters infeasible designs through vendor toolchain feedback before training, evaluates feasible models under a controlled protocol, and verifies deployability through backend-grounded deployment analysis. AutoMCU includes two key mechanisms: 1) hardware-in-the-loop architecture generation for early elimination of undeployable candidates under RAM and Flash constraints, and 2) state-isolated multi-agent scheduling for stable coordination of proposal, training, evaluation, and deployment stages. Experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 under strict MCU constraints show that AutoMCU achieves competitive accuracy while reducing customization time to about 1--2 hours, compared with hundreds of GPU hours for representative MCU-oriented HW-NAS baselines. Comparisons with ColabNAS and the LLM-based NAS method GENIUS on NAS-Bench-201 further demonstrate the effectiveness and stability of AutoMCU. Real-device deployments on multiple STM32 microcontrollers validate its practical applicability to MCU-scale edge intelligence.

Probing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and building robust solutions for Multiple-Choice Question Answering (MCQA) remain central challenges in natural language understanding. Furthermore, the rapid proliferation of LLMs has created the implicit assumption that more sophisticated prompting techniques yield better performance. Several studies claim such gains, but report them under differing models, prompt wordings and answer-extraction rules, so the gains cannot be attributed to the technique alone. We address this gap with ReasonLab, an evaluation framework in which the prompting technique is a first-class experimental variable alongside the model and the dataset, and which retains every generation for inspection. Using ReasonLab we conduct a controlled study of 8 prompting techniques across 10 MCQA datasets, 27 model configurations and 480,927 evaluations at temperature 0. We find that the prompting technique is a minor determinant of accuracy: on configurations without a reasoning budget the reasoning triggers improve on direct prompting by only 3.92 to 4.69 pp and are indistinguishable from one another, and on configurations with reasoning enabled no technique differs by more than 0.51 pp. Self-Generate is the only technique with a consistent effect, a reduction of 2.95 pp. We further investigate three phenomena: (1) the comparison of models on a common set of datasets, where model size does not predict accuracy, (2) the trade-offs across thinking budgets, where enabling reasoning is worth up to 12.74 pp whereas an eightfold budget increase adds only 0.48 to 2.10 pp, and (3) the variation in dataset difficulty, with 60% of benchmarks below 70% accuracy and a 43.9 pp spread from easiest to hardest. These results suggest that, for MCQA, the prompting technique is a minor lever compared with enabling model reasoning, and that substantial headroom remains.

Large Language Models with chain-of-thought prompting, such as OpenAI-o1, have shown impressive capabilities in natural language inference tasks. However, Multi-hop Question Answering (MHQA) remains challenging for many existing models due to issues like hallucination, error propagation, and limited context length. To address these challenges and enhance LLMs' performance on MHQA, we propose the Self-Guiding prompting Finite State Machine (SG-FSM), designed to strengthen multi-hop reasoning abilities. Unlike traditional chain-of-thought methods, SG-FSM tackles MHQA by iteratively breaking down complex questions into sub-questions, correcting itself to improve accuracy. It processes one sub-question at a time, dynamically deciding the next step based on the current context and results, functioning much like an automaton. Experiments across various benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, outperforming strong baselines on challenging datasets such as Musique. SG-FSM reduces hallucination, enabling recovery of the correct final answer despite intermediate errors. It also improves adherence to specified output formats, simplifying evaluation significantly.

Roy Harris's Integrationist linguistics offers a compelling critique of the referentialist tradition embedded deep at the heart of computational approaches to language, arguing that language is not a code that maps onto a pre-given world but a situated, bipartite activity oriented toward prospective joint action. Yet Integrationism leaves certain explanatory gaps: it does not fully account for the structural mechanism by which signs sustain prospective openness, it undertheorises the continuity between linguistic and non-linguistic semiotic activity, and it offers no detailed account of the structural properties of the accumulated archive of past integrations. This paper argues that Elan Barenholtz's autogenerative theory of language, developed in response to the behaviour of Large Language Models (LLMs), can fill precisely these gaps, enriching Integrationism without undermining any of its core commitments. Specifically, the autogenerative account provides: a structural mechanism for the prospective openness that Harris identifies as central to bipartite communication; a computational correlate for Harris's thesis of semiotic continuity between language and other sign-making activity; and a theory of the archive: what the accumulated residue of past integrations looks like and how new participants draw upon it. The synthesis preserves Harris's ontological primacy of the situated integrative act while adding explanatory content that Integrationism itself does not supply. For practitioners and researchers in natural language processing and large language model design, the argument offers a principled account of what the statistical structure that LLMs so effectively exploit actually is, and of what it cannot, by its nature, provide.

Large Language Models (LLMs) typically exhibit a performance profile where reliability degrades as task complexity increases. We address the challenge of generating high-quality natural language executable plans for complex tasks by introducing $\textbf{GRASP}$, a strategy-aware, multi-stage planning framework. GRASP decouples the planning pipeline across specialized, context-isolated modules: it pre-compiles global macro-guidelines (GenPlan), explores alternative localized strategies within isolated context windows (RevPlan), and independently evaluates trajectories using a multi-criteria discriminator (VerPlan). Empirical evaluations show that GRASP consistently establishes a new state-of-the-art frontier across diverse datasets, yielding substantial accuracy gains over direct LLM planners on Natural Plan Calendar Scheduling ($\sim$12.4\%$$\uparrow), ZebraLogic ($\sim$30.8\%$$\uparrow), and SciBench Math. Crucially, under multi-task scaling-where standard planners suffer immediate performance collapse-GRASP completely flattens the multi-task degradation penalty. In interleaved dual-task environments, GRASP achieves an absolute accuracy gain of up to 16.7$\%$ over direct LLM planners. Furthermore, by isolating context and enforcing strict macro-regularization, GRASP outperforms frontier reasoning models (such as GPT-5-mini) by a margin of 14.5$\%$.

A key step toward autonomous industrial operation is the ability to create and reconfigure control policies from natural-language requirement specifications, with minimal or no manual redesign. In this setting, policy generation by AI agents can be a credible path when paired with a plant-aware validator (e.g., a digital twin) that can check generated candidate actions before execution. However, practical deployment is constrained by inference latency and compute footprint: large cloud-based models are often too slow, opaque, or data-sensitive for edge closed-loop use. This work investigates whether a compact Small Language Model (SLM) can be retrained for control reasoning and embedded in a validator-guided correction loop. We use a Qwen2.5-1.5B model aligned via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), combined with (i) an action agent, (ii) a symbolic/digital-twin-style validation layer, and (iii) a reprompting agent that iteratively steers outputs toward valid actions. In randomized thermal-control simulations (30 experiments with 500 steps each), the framework achieves 91.5% average action-alignment accuracy (86.3%--100% across cases) at 3.84,s mean inference latency. Under symbolic re-mapping, it maintains a 95% in-range rate, indicating robust physical regulation despite reduced token-level agreement. These results support SLM+validator architectures as a practical path toward reconfigurable autonomous control at the edge.

System-generated logs underpin security monitoring, yet their rigid template-based format hinders both automated analysis and human comprehension. We present NLLog (Natural-Language Log), a lightweight pipeline that deterministically rewrites parsed templates into WHO-WHAT-SEVERITY sentences, pools them with term-frequency-inverse-document-frequency weighting, classifies sessions with tree ensembles, and back-projects evidence with TreeSHAP for analyst review. On Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) and Blue Gene/L (BGL) corpora, NLLog exceeds two reproduced matched-protocol baselines; across HDFS, BGL, and the AIT Alert Data Set, it sustains low false-positive rates with commodity-hardware latency suitable for security operations center triage. Coverage, sparse-versus-dense, faithfulness, and adversarial ablations show that fallback sufficiency is corpus-dependent, that an enrollment-time coverage check can surface refinement requirements before deployment, and that an auditable deterministic rewrite combined with lightweight dense encoding provides a measurable representation layer for log-anomaly detection and triage.

Data quality assessment is a critical prerequisite for effective data analytics and data-driven decision-making, yet it remains a challenging task due to the inherently context-dependent nature of data quality. Existing approaches often rely on static rules or manual assessment strategies, limiting their adaptability to diverse usage scenarios and constraining automation at scale. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models, offer new opportunities for automating data quality assessment, but raise concerns related to reliability, grounding, and execution safety. In this paper, we propose a unified agentic-retrieval framework for autonomous context-aware data quality assessment. The framework interprets natural-language descriptions of intended data usage, derives context-aware assessment strategies, and generates executable validation logic through a multi-agent workflow. To ensure operational reliability, the framework introduces a feasibility validation stage that evaluates the realism and executability of generated assessment specifications before execution, enabling iterative refinement when necessary. Accepted validation logic is executed deterministically to guarantee reproducible and auditable results. We implement the proposed framework as an end-to-end prototype and evaluate it across multiple usage scenarios applied to the same dataset. The results demonstrate that assessment outcomes adapt meaningfully to different intended uses, while feasibility-gated execution reduces unrealistic or non-executable rule generation. The proposed approach provides a practical foundation for deploying autonomous yet controlled data quality assessment in modern data-driven environments.

Vision-Language Navigation in Continuous Environments (VLN-CE) poses a formidable challenge for autonomous agents, requiring seamless integration of natural language instructions and visual observations to navigate complex 3D indoor spaces. Existing approaches often falter in long-horizon tasks due to limited scene understanding, inefficient planning, and lack of robust decision-making frameworks. We introduce the \textbf{Hierarchical Semantic-Augmented Navigation (HSAN)} framework, a groundbreaking approach that redefines VLN-CE through three synergistic innovations. First, HSAN constructs a dynamic hierarchical semantic scene graph, leveraging vision-language models to capture multi-level environmental representations, from objects to regions to zones, enabling nuanced spatial reasoning. Second, it employs an optimal transport-based topological planner, grounded in Kantorovich's duality, to select long-term goals by balancing semantic relevance and spatial accessibility with theoretical guarantees of optimality. Third, a graph-aware reinforcement learning policy ensures precise low-level control, navigating subgoals while robustly avoiding obstacles. By integrating spectral graph theory, optimal transport, and advanced multi-modal learning, HSAN addresses the shortcomings of static maps and heuristic planners prevalent in prior work. Extensive experiments on multiple challenging VLN-CE datasets demonstrate that HSAN achieves state-of-the-art performance, with significant improvements in navigation success and generalization to unseen environments.

The rising global prevalence of mental health conditions, together with longstanding barriers in traditional healthcare, such as limited resources, high cost, stigma, and privacy concerns, has created an urgent need for accessible and scalable support. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a transformative technology with strong potential to democratize mental health support through advanced natural language understanding and generation. However, the rapidly expanding, fragmented body of work in this area lacks a coherent evolutionary narrative, making it difficult to contextualize current progress and identify future directions. This survey addresses this gap by organizing and analyzing the literature around a central thesis: the role of LLMs in mental health is evolving through three distinct, increasingly sophisticated phases. We trace this trajectory from Phase I, in which LLMs act primarily as passive Information Tools and Pattern Recognizers for assessment; through Phase II, where they function as Empathetic Conversationalists for in-the-moment, stateless interactions; to the current frontier, Phase III, which seeks Longitudinal, Personalized Companions implemented as stateful cognitive agents. To support this framework, we systematically review core technologies, agent architectures (Profile, Memory, Reasoning, and Planning), and the critical infrastructure of datasets and benchmarks, highlighting how their evolution underpins this developmental path. Viewing the field through this developmental lens, we provide a comprehensive synthesis of existing work, an insightful narrative of its trajectory, and a clear roadmap for future innovation in responsible, effective, and human-centered AI for mental healthcare. A curated collection of the resources reviewed in this survey is available at our project repository: https://github.com/Emo-gml/Awesome-Mental-Health-LLMs.

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) has enabled a new class of agentic systems capable of integrating natural language understanding with tool-based execution. In geographic information systems (GIS), this shift is transforming traditional, expert-driven workflows into semiautonomous systems that can interpret user intent, construct spatial workflows, and execute geospatial analysis tasks. However, existing approaches remain limited by fragmented integration of reasoning, execution, and evaluation, particularly in complex, real-world environments. This study synthesizes recent advances in agentic GIS frameworks, benchmarks, and surveys to identify limitations in spatial reasoning, execution robustness, validation, governance, and evaluation. Building on these insights, it introduces ANASSA (Autonomous Neural Agents for Spatial Systems Architecture), an agentic AI orchestration framework that integrates structured spatial reasoning, multi-agent workflow orchestration, execution feedback, authoritative spatial validation, provenance, uncertainty handling, and human decision authority within a unified system design. The contribution is an architecture-level specification: eleven components across four layers, a six-step Geospatial AI Cognitive Loop, cross-component contracts, and governance mechanisms intended to make agentic geospatial workflows traceable, reproducible, and accountable. Empirical performance evaluation is reserved for implementation and deployment studies.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models can connect scene understanding, semantic reasoning, and trajectory generation for autonomous driving. However, verbose natural-language Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is poorly suited to real-time control because it is open-ended, costly to decode, and difficult to optimize as an action-facing representation. We propose XCoT-VLA, which replaces descriptive rationales with compact executable CoT tokens learned from automatically constructed Reason-Action supervision. Logged trajectories provide action evidence, while scene context supplies causal semantics. The predicted XCoT sequence remains in context and conditions fixed trajectory queries through shared multimodal self-attention. Deterministic token-function routing applies the Reason FFN to XCoT tokens and the Control FFN to trajectory queries for flow-matching trajectory generation. We further introduce XCoT Policy Optimization (XCPO) as an optional refinement extension in the same executable token space. XCoT-VLA reduces longitudinal ADE from 1.645 to 1.323 on a general-distribution set and lateral FDE from 1.616 to 0.648 in lane-change scenarios. By representing driving-oriented reasoning with only 2-6 executable XCoT tokens, our method substantially reduces autoregressive reasoning overhead and remains within the real-time planning budget. These results demonstrate that driving-oriented reasoning can be compact, executable, and directly connected to trajectory generation.

Understanding concepts is fundamental to generalization. Despite their impressive performance on a wide range of tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) still struggle with genuine concept understanding. Prior work has evaluated conceptual understanding in LLMs using natural-language benchmarks or narrowly scoped synthetic tasks, but these settings often conflate multiple skills or lack precise control over the underlying concepts and their properties. To support controlled probing of concepts in LLMs, we design tests on their core properties: abstraction, compositionality, and groundness. We set up a concept-centric benchmark, targeting spatial concepts such as direction, distance, topology, and their compositions, and use question answering tasks serving as a proxy. We conduct extensive experiments across multiple LLM architectures and training regimes to analyze how model scale and design impact conceptual understanding. The results reveal clear limitations in current LLMs and provide insights into the factors shaping their ability to acquire and compose structured concepts. Our findings shed light on how concept-based LLMs can be redesigned for improved information access and knowledge management. The code will be available at https://github.com/rd20karim/concept-probing.

Much clinical value is conveyed not through structured records but through communication: exchanges in which patients describe symptoms, clinicians reason and give instructions, ambulances hand over to emergency departments, and nurses pass on a shift. Such language differs from tabular data because meaning depends on speaker role, intent, causality, uncertainty, omission, and channel noise. Healthcare natural language processing must therefore interpret information as conveyed rather than coded. This requires well-annotated corpora, which are scarce because authentic exchanges are private, fragmented, and costly to annotate. Large language models offer a way forward by transforming clinical sources, such as records, diagnostic labels, symptom lists, or care plans, into written and transcribed communication for downstream models. We present a structured narrative survey organized by source representation, communication form and participants, generation method, and downstream task, complemented by thirteen novel case studies. These build clinical NLP systems for communication channels and languages without labeled real-world data, including EMS pre-arrival reports, field-radio casualty documentation, nurse handoffs, patient-portal triage, and low-resource discharge communication. They show that synthetic communication can bootstrap such systems. Findings include the competitiveness of fine-tuned encoder models over evaluated zero-shot baselines and the value of deliberately degraded communication for robustness. The main limitation is that most studies evaluate on held-out synthetic communication, while train-on-synthetic, test-on-authentic evidence remains limited. We conclude that syn-thetic clinical communication is becoming a practical research resource; establishing it as reusable clinical infrastructure will require authentic-data transfer, safety and external validation.

Biomedical literature is increasingly mined for knowledge beyond the questions it was written to answer. Because the target concepts are not known in advance, annotators prefer open-ended labels, whose agreement is hard to quantify. We study soft inter-rater reliability for annotators providing unstructured texts for biomedical annotation tasks. Synthetic experiments show that soft reliability can be quantified using a variety of semantic equivalence measures, and that the choice of measure affects failure modes of the estimation. Embeddings are scalable, but limited when differentiating similar but distinct concepts. Large language models are promising, but limited by scalability for estimating agreement by chance. Finally, we suggest measures based on natural language inference as a sensible compromise.

As semiconductor manufacturing advances toward sub-2nm nodes, local place-and-route (P&R) design-rule violation (DRV) fixing is increasingly limited by complex rule interactions, dense multi-layer routing geometries, and foundry-specific constraints. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong capabilities in EDA scripting and documentation, their application to visual layout understanding remains largely unexplored: diagnosing DRC violations from layout imagery demands precise geometric reasoning and foundry-specific rule knowledge absent from general-purpose VLM training. We propose SCALE, a framework with a self-supervised layout-generation stage for local DRV fixing at advanced nodes. Multi-layer layout geometry is serialized into structured text, and a fine-tuned language model learns to reconstruct randomly masked polygons from surrounding BEOL context alone without violation labels. At inference, natural-language rule constraints and high-temperature sampling steer generation toward diverse, violation-prone layout variants validated by an industrial signoff DRC checker, producing DRC-annotated layout--violation pairs used to fine-tune a domain-adapted DRC-VLM. This VLM provides rule-aware geometric guidance for local DRV repair, boosting state-of-the-art agents' solve rates by +12--25% (up to 97%) on 100 real sub-2nm cases spanning enclosure, spacing, width, and color-spacing violations.

Recent years have seen substantial advances in radiology report generation (RRG), yet existing approaches predominantly adopt direct feature fusion when handling multi-view X-ray images. Such approaches overlook the potential clinical inconsistencies and inaccuracies arising when a single model processes different views, adversely impacting performance and clinical reliability. To this end, we introduce View-PNDF (View-specific Pattern Neuron Detection and Fine-tuning), a parameter-efficient framework that fosters view-consistent report generation from a neuronal perspective. Specifically, View-PNDF comprises: (i) a view-specific neuron detection module identifying neurons responsive to particular views, (ii) a verification module quantifying the existence of these neurons, and (iii) a selective fine-tuning strategy strengthening detected neurons while preserving view-agnostic representations. By updating only view-specific neurons, View-PNDF achieves consistent diagnoses across different views with reduced computational costs. Subsequently, we employ Large Language Models (LLMs) to consolidate the view-specific reports into a complete radiology report. Furthermore, we use traditional Natural Language Generation (NLG) metrics-based assessment on integrated reports for baseline comparison and employ LLM-based assessment (e.g., GPT-4o) on view-specific reports to capture clinical significance. Extensive experiments on two medical RRG benchmarks demonstrate that View-PNDF substantially improves view-specific chest X-ray report generation quality while maintaining robust general-view performance.

Social robot navigation (SRN) requires more than geometric path planning; it demands understanding human intentions, social norms, and contextual cues to generate socially compliant behaviors. Although classical navigation methods provide reliable metric planning and collision avoidance, they often lack the semantic reasoning capabilities necessary for operation in complex human-centered environments. Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have opened new opportunities for SRN by enabling high-level VLM understanding, commonsense reasoning, and natural language interaction. However, a fundamental challenge remains: how to integrate VLMs into real-time, safety-critical navigation systems and reliably translate their high-level reasoning into grounded navigation actions. In this survey, we present a unified perspective of VLM-based SRN and organize existing approaches into three interconnected components: high-level VLM reasoning, low-level planning and control, and intermediate mechanisms that bridge reasoning and action. Based on this perspective, we propose a structured roadmap for coupling VLMs with navigation systems, covering semantic reasoning, evaluators, spatial grounding, intermediate representations, and control modules. The roadmap highlights both the strengths of VLMs and the necessity of hybrid architectures for practical deployment. We further review representative datasets and evaluation platforms developed for SRN. Finally, we discuss key open challenges. This survey aims to provide a foundation for building reliable, socially compliant, and deployable VLM-enabled navigation systems.

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the gold standard for non-invasive diagnosis of cardiac pathologies and is a fundamental pillar of cardiovascular medicine. Recent progress in deep learning has led to the development of robust automated classifiers that achieve high performance by processing raw physiological signals. However, in clinical practice, diagnosis is rarely based solely on the signal. Cardiologists commonly support their interpretation with the patient's characteristics and the specific data-acquisition context. Despite this, most current algorithms remain restricted to signal-only analysis, failing to integrate technical metadata and demographic variables. This paper proposes Contextual Language-Informed Cardiac pathology classification (CLIC), a multimodal framework that significantly enhances diagnostic precision by encoding these variables through natural language. We demonstrate that translating patient-level contextual data into descriptive text provides an informative anchor that helps the model disambiguate complex physiological patterns. We further investigate the use of Large Language Models to synthesize richer clinical descriptions and observe that, while these generated texts remain competitive, controlled template-based contextual clinical text leads to consistent improvements in downstream classification performance.

Large Language Models (LLMs) remain substantially less data-efficient than humans. Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic languages has been proposed to close this gap, with prior work emphasizing highly expressive formal languages such as $k$-Shuffle Dyck. Inspired by the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) hypothesis, which posits that innate constraints preemptively restrict the learner's hypothesis space to natural-language-like structure, we propose LAD-inspired PPT: pre-pretraining on MP-STRUCT, a formal language whose strings encode hierarchical composition, feature-based dependencies, and long-distance displacement via MERGE, AGREE, and MOVE. A brief 500-step PPT with MP-STRUCT matches strong formal-language baselines in token efficiency while additionally imparting a human-like resistance to structurally implausible languages (e.g., REVERSE). Analyzing simplified variants, we find that MP-STRUCT CORE outperforms $k$-Shuffle Dyck despite not being definable in C-RASP (a formal bound on transformer expressivity), challenging the prior hypothesis that effective PPT languages must be both hierarchically expressive and circuit-theoretically learnable. We show that functional landmarks, which reduce dependency resolution ambiguity, are a key driver, suggesting that effective PPT design depends not only on expressivity but also on the accessibility of dependency resolution.

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) are difficult to detect and interpret due to their multi-stage and stealthy nature. While recent autonomous defense systems leverage provenance graphs and learning-based models for detection and mitigation, their outputs remain largely machine-oriented and difficult for analysts to interpret. Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising interface for report generation, but often produce hallucinated or weakly grounded content. In this paper, we propose DeepFaith, an evidence-grounded framework for faithful incident reporting in multi-stage APT defense. DeepFaith transforms structured outputs from autonomous defense and explainability modules into natural-language reports that are explicitly aligned with underlying system evidence. The framework integrates a unified evidence representation, evidence-grounded prompting, faithfulness-aware generation, and post-generation verification to ensure that all generated statements are supported. Experiments in a realistic enterprise testbed demonstrate that DeepFaith improves faithfulness from 0.68 to 0.92, reduces unsupported claims from 0.32 to 0.08, and increases temporal consistency from 0.6 to 0.88, while maintaining concise reports and lower error rates than existing template-based and LLM-based solutions. These results show that evidence-grounded generation enables reliable, interpretable, and actionable reporting for security operations centers.