Multi-Agent Systems

We study the application of federated learning (FL) to indoor fire detection. Such fire-detection systems use edge cameras that record sensitive footage which cannot easily be collected at a central server. Existing federated solutions leave three practical obstacles unaddressed: limited uplink bandwidth, Byzantine (malicious or faulty) clients, and unconditional trust in a single, permanently fixed aggregation server. Our main contributions address all three. In particular, we provide (i) a curated indoor fire-detection dataset assembled from eight public sources; (ii) an edge-deployable detector whose model updates are compressed up to 10 times with only a small loss in balanced accuracy; and (iii) a semi-decentralized Byzantine-robust FL method that combines history-aware aggregation with a rotating coordinator, evicting stealthy attacks that per-round filters miss while removing the fixed-server single point of failure. On the held-out test set the rotating-coordinator method matches its fixed-server counterpart in accuracy and detection speed, and a physically distributed six-node cloud deployment confirms feasibility.

Large language model agents are increasingly deployed in settings where the value of an action depends on what other agents do. This creates a strategic reliability problem: the same game may be described as a business negotiation, a friendly compromise, a diplomatic exchange, or an abstract payoff matrix, and the model may choose different actions even when the incentives are unchanged. This paper introduces \emph{Same Game, Different Story}, a benchmark for strategic robustness: invariance of model-induced action distributions under payoff-preserving language changes. The empirical analysis uses a deliberately narrow, literature-calibrated comparison from Lor`e and Heydari's peer-reviewed study: business framing versus friend-sharing framing across GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and LLaMa-2 in four social-dilemma games, with 300 initializations per retained model-game-context cell. The retained design comprises 24 of the source study's 60 cells, representing 7,200 decisions. Because trial-level files were not available from the article, the analysis is presented as a secondary calibration based on reconstructed published rates, not as new model runs. As a conservative sensitivity analysis, effect magnitudes are attenuated by 30% toward the null: action shifts are multiplied by 0.70, and non-robustness, defined as one minus the robustness score, is multiplied by 0.70. Under this attenuation, pooled strategic robustness is 0.783 with a 95% bootstrap interval from 0.774 to 0.790, and friend-sharing framing raises cooperation by 0.307 with a 95% bootstrap interval from 0.297 to 0.316 relative to business framing. The analysis supports the narrower claim that social-relational framing can change strategic choices even when incentives are held fixed, without extending the analysis to a broader suite of contextual or cross-benchmark comparisons.