Multi-Agent Systems

A multi-agent system can reduce latency on complex tasks by executing work concurrently. Several pioneering harness frameworks support multi-agent systems. However, the scalability of current multi-agent harnesses is often constrained by a central orchestrator's capacity to allocate tasks and coordinate workers. To address this limitation, we introduce Agensh, a scalable self-organized multi-agent harness without a central orchestrator: concurrent workers execute a multi-agent cooperation loop, continuously gathering context, claiming and self-assigning sub-tasks, taking action and sharing findings, verifying results, and merging progress in an asynchronous manner. The loop is supported by the agentic organization infrastructure comprising three components: a shared workspace holds proposed, ongoing, and completed work; a message interface lets workers communicate; and shared context retains reusable findings and work intentions. To test the scalability of Agensh, we evaluate it on the five hardest ProgramBench tasks with GPT-5.6-sol (high). Scaling from 1 to 128 agents raises the mean final test-pass rate from 19.31% to 28.78%, an approximately 49% relative improvement. Larger organizations reach comparable test-pass rates earlier. On pandoc, scaling from 1 to 1,024 agents raises the final test-pass rate from 33.89% to 55.06%. Worker trajectories further show that different forms of self-organized cooperation gradually emerges and standardizes as the organization grows. These results reveal the number of agents as a new scaling dimension for multi-agent organizations to expand the frontier of general intelligence, offering a practical solution for complex tasks under hard latency constraints or time budgets.

Social norms cannot be identified from behavior alone: the same cooperative equilibrium may reflect shared expectations, strategic incentives, or simple imitation. Yet in multi-agent large language model systems, prior work largely treats behavioral convergence as evidence of norm emergence. In this work, we introduce an evaluation framework that measures agents' reported empirical and normative expectations in addition to behavioral convergence. Through controlled ablations, we test the effect of expectation elicitation and isolate two collective mechanisms central to theories of norm formation---social learning through interaction and social selection through network-based group formation. We further test the stability of these resulting dynamics under adversarial disruption across four LLM families. We find that eliciting expectations increases cooperative contributions, while social learning stabilizes behavior, and social selection reliably identifies cooperators but provides limited behavioral reinforcement. Following disruption, normative expectations and behavioral coordination recover differently. Together, these results show that similar cooperative outcomes can arise from different underlying social processes. By making expectations observable, our framework allows us to attribute each mechanism's contribution separately, offering designers of multi-agent systems a principled basis for selecting the social processes that sustain cooperation.

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) commonly trains decentralized policies from scratch, requiring agents to acquire individual task competence and coordination simultaneously. Yet many multi-agent problems admit a compatible single-agent counterpart in which the underlying task can be learned in isolation. We introduce Multi-Agent Observation Transformation for Existing Single-Agent Policies (MATES), an input-side adaptation framework for tasks whose multi-agent observations preserve the solo-task information while exposing separately identifiable neighbor information. From multi-agent experience, MATES learns a small adapter that maps this observation into the format expected by a frozen single-agent policy, inducing actions suited to the shared environment without updating the single-agent policy itself. MATES leaves the pretrained policy's internal architecture unchanged and retains the objectives and update procedures of the underlying MARL algorithm. We evaluate MATES using both on- and off-policy algorithms on lifelong pathfinding, navigation, and cooperative discovery, spanning discrete and continuous observation and action spaces. Across all evaluated settings, MATES optimizes only 3.5-7.3% as many parameters as full-policy training while consistently outperforming MARL training from scratch. It approaches the performance of full fine-tuning, remains competitive overall with demonstration-based baselines, and retains strong task performance at team sizes not encountered during training. These results provide evidence that, under this observation structure, effective multi-agent behavior can be learned without modifying the policy that encodes individual competence.

We study distributed Byzantine-resilient actor-critic multi-agent reinforcement learning (AC-MARL), where agents collectively learn policies through local interactions. Existing methods guarantee convergence of the agents' parameters only to a neighborhood of the attack-free limit points, resulting in degraded performance. We propose Fully Resilient AC-MARL (FRAC-MARL), a decentralized method in which each agent leverages redundancy in two-hop messages to identify reliable messages. Under linear parameterizations of the value and team-reward functions and Byzantine edge attacks, where adversarial behavior is confined to the communication layer, we prove that agents' parameters converge almost surely to the same limit points as in the attack-free case over time-varying communication graphs. We introduce a novel topological condition for the convergence of our method, present a systematic method to construct such networks, and prove that this condition can be verified in polynomial time. Finally, we demonstrate our method on cooperative multi-robot formation control tasks.

This work investigates the use of flow-based connectivity maintenance constraints in mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) trajectory planning and decision-making models for networked multi-agent systems (MAS). We integrate flow-based encodings for standard and k-hop connectivity into MILP multi-vehicle maneuvering models that are widely used alongside receding horizon planning strategies. Their necessity and sufficiency is demonstrated, guaranteeing full coverage of potential network topologies. The flow formulation for standard connectivity decreases the growth of the required inequality constraints from exponential to polynomial w.r.t. the size of the MAS when compared to the state-of-the-art subtour elimination (SEC) method. The flow-based k-hop connectivity constraints decrease the number of required binary variables and decouple its growth from the number of hops. However, the impact of these formulations in performance is not straightforward due to the introduction of a substantial number of continuous flow optimization variables and, in the case of k-hop connectivity, additional inequality constraints. We investigate this trade-off through a statistical evaluation of costs and optimization times using a conventional branch-and-bound commercial solver and trials performed with randomized environments for increasingly larger MAS. The results show that the flow formulation outperforms SEC in standard connectivity problems, enabling the solutions to be computed for larger MAS considering the imposed optimization time limit. The reduction in number of binary variables enabled by the k-hop flow formulations decreases the theoretical worst-case number of iterations required by the branch-and-bound algorithm to compute the global optimal solution. Our results show that this advantage did not translate into improvements in the average performance when compared to the baseline.

Reinforcement learning agents trained to maximize their own reward in repeated interactions can converge to supra-competitive outcomes resembling explicit collusion, without communication or shared design. Existing mitigation approaches are largely tied to specific economic settings, like two-sided platforms and auctions, leaving open how to design interventions for general repeated games. We address this gap by formalizing the connection between empirical observations from prior work on Q-learning collusion and classical theory of Simple Penal Codes (SPCs). We show any non-trivial SPC induces a quantifiable conditional dependence in agents' policies, detectable via the total variation distance between an agent's action distributions across cooperation and defection histories. Building on this connection, we propose CURB (Collusion Unwinding via Reward shaping and Belief injection), a reward-shaping framework that penalizes this Total Variation (TV) distance signal during Q-learning and is guaranteed to convert any SPC fixed point of the dynamics into a trivial one, thus precluding collusive equilibria sustained by punishment threats. Empirically, CURB substantially reduces collusion by Q-learning agents in both Bertrand and Cournot Competition Repeated Games. We further demonstrate that CURB extends to deep Q-network agents in Bertrand competition, suggesting the mechanism generalizes beyond tabular Q-learning.

Self-evolving methods reduce the need for human-annotated trajectories by allowing tool-using agents to generate their own training data. Yet existing methods typically separate trajectory generation from evaluation, relying on static verifiers that cannot adapt to emerging failure modes or self-consistency signals that may reinforce errors shared across trajectories. Jointly adapting planning, execution, and evaluation offers a promising alternative, but introduces a fundamental coordination challenge: each component continuously changes the data or feedback used to train the others. We address this challenge with \textbf{UnifiedPlayers}, a cooperative framework comprising a Planning Player that generates tasks, an Execution Player that produces multi-turn trajectories with Python tool calls, and an Evaluation Player that constructs executable verifiers. We design role-specific rewards that coordinate the three players toward a shared learning objective under GRPO. Across two model backbones and twelve reasoning benchmarks, UnifiedPlayers outperforms the strongest prior baseline by at least 3.5% on mathematical reasoning and 3.9% on general reasoning tasks. Moreover, the learned verifier achieves 84.2% adversarial detection accuracy, while its reward signal exhibits 2.03$\times$ higher per-question variance than a self-consistency baseline, providing more discriminative verifications. These results highlight cooperation among specialized players as a promising path toward self-enhanced tool-integrated agents.

The rapid advancement of large language models and single-agent harnesses has reshaped the landscape of autonomous systems, raising a critical question of when multi-agent collaboration offers genuine value. As individual agent capabilities continue to scale, multi-agent collaboration faces diminishing returns while incurring growing context overhead. Through systematic analysis, we delineate the capability boundaries of multi-agent collaboration relative to single-agent alternatives, showing that it confers systematic benefits specifically in long-horizon tasks with sparse dependencies, while single-agent harnesses remain superior in tightly coupled, sequential workflows. Building on these insights, we propose SAIGE, a lightweight multi-agent collaboration mechanism based on Semantic-Aware Incremental Graph Evolution. SAIGE models collaboration as a dynamically evolving graph, where nodes are agent instances spawned on demand and edges encode semantic dependencies established through content-based information retrieval. Experiments on long-horizon, complex task benchmarks show that SAIGE achieves a favorable trade-off between context efficiency and task performance, and that scaling the agent pool or deepening the recursion level does not consistently improve outcomes. Our findings suggest that multi-agent superiority is bounded by task structure rather than universal, and that more agents do not necessarily make a system more intelligent.

Financial QA systems are typically improved before deployment through better retrieval, prompting, or agent coordination, leaving their reliability behavior fixed thereafter. In practice, new SEC-filing questions repeatedly expose heterogeneous errors in period, entity, evidence use, and calculation. Existing self-improvement methods can turn failures into new behaviors, but offer limited control over where a correction should apply or which previously correct answers it may break. We therefore frame post-deployment improvement as controlled behavioral maintenance: recurring failures should become scoped skill patches, and each patch should earn deployment with- out introducing regressions. We instantiate this view in FINSKILLOPS, a multi-agent system for SEC filing QA. FINSKILLOPS derives reusable skills from evidence-grounded, typed failure diagnoses and governs them through targeted validation, protected-case regression checks, negative controls, and versioned replacement or retirement. Across six financial QA benchmarks, a single frozen skill registry achieves the highest verdict-weighted correctness and reference consistency among the evaluated systems. Evolved skills raise correctness from 3.70 to 4.55 on our enhanced benchmark. In a separate 12-round operational study, only six of 33 proposed skills are promoted, while the monitoring non-correct rate falls from 20.0% to 12.5%. These results establish controlled skill scope, admission, and lifecycle management as the foundation for reliable self-improvement.

Low-altitude wireless networks (LAWNs) are emerging as a key infrastructure for heterogeneous unmanned aerial systems that support concurrent services within a shared three-dimensional airspace. Their coexistence creates strong coupling among mobility, connectivity, and shared network resources, while heterogeneous services impose distinct and time-varying requirements. These interactions naturally form a dynamic non-cooperative game in which both operating conditions and coordination objectives evolve over time. Conventional optimization and learning-based controllers typically rely on predefined objectives, limiting their ability to adapt autonomously to changing service requirements and resource priorities. To address this challenge, we propose a hierarchical hybrid large language model (LLM)- multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) architecture organized as a dual-loop structure. Specifically, an outer adaptation loop employs LLM-assisted game orchestration to interpret service requirements and operator intent, and reconfigure objectives and resource priorities, while an inner loop executes decentralized, parameter-conditioned MARL policies under the configured game. A logistics-monitoring case study illustrates how the proposed framework facilitates coordinated coexistence among heterogeneous services, adapting to evolving operating conditions without retraining the underlying MARL policies. Finally, we discuss key challenges and research directions toward scalable, trustworthy, and adaptive agentic LAWNs.

As model-generated content is increasingly consumed by other model instances in automated workflows, a practically important question arises: can a model embed a signal in natural language that an independent instance of the same model can detect, relying only on shared pre-training and task instructions, without any shared memory or coordination-specific training? We introduce For Your Eyes Only, a cooperative signalling game designed to evaluate this directly. A Sender produces free-form descriptions for two words, one of which is a hidden target; an isolated Receiver must identify it. We evaluate seven contemporary models from four architectural families on 300 word pairs from established psycholinguistic corpora, using the Double-Pass Success Rate to control for output biases. We find that most models struggle to maintain coordination once they are required to avoid detectable signals, while one frontier model retains near-perfect performance even after such filtering. We further show that models can direct this capability toward deliberate misdirection, and that coordination is consistently weaker across architectures than within them.

LLM coding agents now generate complex programs at a scale that makes thorough human review increasingly difficult, raising the risk of safety and security failures. Common approaches, including fuzz testing, static analysis, and LLM-as-a-Verifier, can detect many failures but struggle to cover all possible edge cases. Formal verification addresses this by providing machine-checkable guarantees over specified properties, but traditionally demands substantial manual specification and proof engineering. We introduce a unified multi-agent framework, MAGS, that generates executable programs with formal safety guarantees, using Dafny as a verification-aware intermediate representation where safety properties can be mechanically checked. MAGS formalizes and freezes human-audited APIs and safety requirements, translates generated code into Dafny, repairs violations using verifier feedback, and compiles verified programs back into executable code. We evaluate MAGS on 100 CUDA kernels, 100 terminal scripts, and 20 robotic-arm tasks. Across all 220 examples, it achieves a 100% success rate in producing programs with non-trivial safety guarantees against frozen specifications. Independent safety and functional evaluations further show strong performance across all three domains, while revealing failures when the auto-formalized semantics do not fully capture the target behavior.

In multi-agent environments, coordinating agents to prevent interference and ensure robust individual performance is a critical challenge. Previous research on social laws for multi-agent systems has primarily focused on deterministic, goal-based settings. This paper extends the concept of social laws to stochastic, reward-based environments, proposing a formalism for defining and verifying their robustness under various conditions. We introduce the notion of $α$-robustness, a measure of the guaranteed utility each agent retains while pursuing its optimal single agent policy, assuming all agents obey the social law. We then present an approach for robustness verification of social laws in stochastic settings, based on a reduction to solving a series of Markov decision processes. Empirical evaluations on toy environments illustrate the potential of our framework.

Current Mixture-of-Agents (MoA) paradigms generally treat query routing and agent fine-tuning as separate processes, limiting their ability to respond to evolving agent capabilities. This disconnect prevents routing strategies from adapting to evolving agent capabilities during post-training and prevents agents from achieving synergistic data-driven specialization. To resolve this, we introduce CERA-MoA (Co-Evolving Router with continually learning Agents for Mixture-of-Agents), an iterative reinforcement learning framework where the dynamic router and independent agent policies co-evolve. We design a predictive familiarity estimator that leverages mid-layer hidden states to evaluate semantic competence among agents, avoiding the overhead of full rollouts. Based on these familiarity scores, a cumulative-threshold adaptive routing mechanism dynamically activates a tailored minimal agent subset, achieving a trade-off between task performance and efficiency. By proactively allocating targeted training samples to agents based on their evolving competence, CERA-MoA promotes capability differentiation. Extensive experiments across various domains demonstrate that CERA-MoA outperforms state-of-the-art static-agent routing and fix-workflow fine-tuning baselines.

Whole-body humanoid teleoperation commonly combines a motion-tracking policy with a separate dexterous-hand retargeter. However, independently generated commands do not explicitly preserve body-hand geometric relations, leading to mismatches in relative wrist poses and fingertip positions during bimanual interaction. We present a gated residual coordination framework that keeps both modules frozen and applies bounded corrections to their outputs. A motion-conditioned action gate allocates correction authority across joint groups, while reference-geometry-dependent reward gates emphasize relevant interaction objectives during training. To establish the nominal body controller on Agile One, we introduce multi-pose morphology calibration that jointly estimates triaxial scales and effector-local offsets, together with staged motion dataset curation for training a SONIC-based tracker. The residual policy uses human motion references, initial commands, and robot proprioception without explicit object or contact observations. In simulation, it reduces wrist and fingertip geometry errors by 39.2-56.3% over direct composition on held-out GRAB motions, while preserving whole-body tracking on AMASS, with success rates of 89.03% without residual coordination and 89.29% with it. Ablations characterize the contributions of reward gating, adaptive correction authority, and separate body and hand correction heads.

Emergency management assistance programs, such as relief distribution, are essential for delivering necessary supplies to affected communities. However, these programs operate in a decentralized network of local centers that face uncertain local demand and supply dynamics, resulting in inconsistent avail- ability of local services. Redistribution of supplies among these local centers reduces these imbalances, but the centers often make decisions independently, with limited information and disrupted transportation. This study develops CoRe-MARL, a cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework, by formulating a decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (Dec-POMDP). We treat each center as an agent that learns a redistribution policy to improve the service in the worst-case region and reduce the service gap across regions while protecting network-wide service. We incorporate a recurrent network that captures evolving supply and demand dynamics without direct observation, while multi-agent proximal policy optimization (MAPPO) enables centralized training and decentralized execution (CTDE). We evaluate the framework in a simulated environment with diverse trajectories, where exact dynamics are not observed by actors and the MAPPO critic. We compare the recurrent MAPPO with the recurrent independent PPO (IPPO) and a local only heuristic, and find that MAPPO reduces the service gap across local centers and enhances service for the worst-served center while maintaining competitive network-wide service. The recurrent MAPPO also shows consistent performance across diverse trajectory patterns, demonstrating its ability to adapt to evolving dynamics. The findings demonstrate the capability of cooperative learning for decentralized redistribution and improving equitable service under uncertain and evolving dynamics.

State-of-the-art Text-to-SQL systems are typically multi-agent pipelines centered around two fundamental tasks: schema linking and SQL generation. However, existing work trains separate models for each task, failing to leverage the synergy between these interrelated tasks. In this work, we propose DualSQL, a new Text-to-SQL system consisting of two agents powered by a single model backbone. The agents share the same model weights and agentic scaffold, enabling joint optimization through a robust multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) framework. We design three database access tools to facilitate effective multi-step reasoning grounded to interactions with the databases. To improve training and avoid model collapse, we introduce a set of rollout guardrail mechanisms that stabilizes multi-agent RL training, supporting DualSQL to keep improving during training. We also introduce a new SQL correctness metric, robust execution match (REX), to more accurately judge SQL correctness and assign reward signals. Being trained on only 3755 examples, DualSQL-4B achieves an impressive 68.0% execution accuracy on the BIRD development set, matching previous 7B models. DualSQL-8B further improves to 71.1%, outperforming previous state-of-the-art single-model solutions with 32B parameters. These results demonstrate the strength of joint multi-agent reinforcement learning for building high performance Text-to-SQL pipelines.

Multi-agent systems split a task across a tree of agents and justify the split with folklore: smaller contexts, cleaner separation, parallelism. We ask what the split does to how much of what the leaves discover reaches the root. Model a decomposition as a tree in which an agent handed $b$ items keeps any one with probability $r(b)$. If $r(b)=1/b$, every tree delivers exactly one finding, for every task size and every shape; we verify this to $2.4 \times 10^{-15}$ on 20,000 random irregular trees. If $r(b)=Cb^{-δ}$, a depth-$k$ tree over $N$ findings yields $C^k N^{1-δ}$: task size and architecture separate, and architecture contributes only $C \le 1$ per level, so flat is optimal for yield and no arrangement of agents escapes the exponent $δ$. On 600 production deep-research traces $δ= 0.34$ [0.30, 0.38], by three identifications that do not share a failure mode. At a hop where item boundaries come from the tool rather than a text heuristic, and where $b=1$ occurs 550 times, $C = 0.571$ [0.527, 0.615] is observed rather than extrapolated, over 16,082 hops. A tier also costs alignment: on 1,012 annotated multi-agent traces one brief in sixteen goes off-target, giving $μ= 0.939$ and a per-tier penalty $Cμ= 0.536$. Depth is bought on two other axes. The root context is the only state that persists and the only one that cannot cheaply forget, and depth cuts its exposure from $N$ items to $N^{1/k}$. Depth is also cheaper: production flat agents bill as $N^{1.39}$, not the $N^2$ an append-only context predicts, and at equal spend two tiers overtake flat at 403 findings. Across every parameter we measured the model says 0.7% to 11.3% of production sessions are worth delegating, against 7.8% that do. A hazard model on 743,819 production tool calls finds that delegation does not respond to a filling context and is instead an opening move.

As AI agents move from bounded tasks to persistent deployments, failures can propagate through memory, tools, other agents, and environmental state long after their interactions. This creates a safety regime that cannot be characterized by evaluating model responses in isolation. Emergence World, is a continuously running multi-agent environment for adversarial stress testing of long horizon autonomous systems. We ran eight parallel worlds of ten agents from identical starting conditions: seven homogeneous worlds powered by distinct frontier models and one mixed-model world. Across 16 days, the agents generated more than 850,000 LLM calls and nearly 50 billion tokens while pursuing goals, using/creating tools, maintaining persistent memory, and governing shared institutions. After operational state had accumulated, we delivered three controlled stress events through ordinary interaction surfaces: indirect prompt injection, misinformation, and exposure of private agent memories. No evaluated world achieved full resilience across all three events. Detection did not ensure containment: systems could recognize threats while still interacting with adversarial content, writing it into their own persistent memory, and acting on it up to 46 hours later. Persistent operation also exposed recurring tool errors, goal drift, language opacity, conformity despite private disagreement, and coordinated refusal of assigned work. The same model-persona pairing behaved substantially different in mixed and homogeneous populations. Our results suggest that model-level alignment is not compositional: individually capable and apparently safe agents can form systems with qualitatively different failure modes. As AI becomes persistent and interconnected, the frontier of safety therefore shifts from aligning models to engineering resilient autonomous systems.

Multi-agent Systems (MAS) combine multiple model outputs to solve complex reasoning tasks. However, despite rapid growth of available open-source models, there is limited research on how to select optimal model candidates out of this massive pool. We systematically evaluate 8 model selection strategies (including model size, accuracy and answer diversity) across before-generation (routing) and after-generation (majority-voting, LLM-as-a-judge) MAS architectures on challenging scientific benchmarks. Our findings show a significant gap between theoretical oracle potential and actual performance: Expanding candidate pool sizes often degrades performance below that of the top performing base-model. We find that candidate selection within a single model family is the strategy that yields the best relative performance over a standalone model. These results demonstrate that adding arbitrary models to a heterogeneous MAS can introduce system instability, highlighting model selection as a critical design choice for multi-agent systems.

World Action Models (WAMs) offer a promising approach to general-purpose robot manipulation by jointly modeling visual dynamics and actions. However, most WAM studies focus on tabletop or arm-centric manipulation, while humanoid loco-manipulation remains less explored. To address this gap, we introduce WholeBodyWAM, which jointly predicts future visual dynamics, manipulation actions, and whole-body control intents for generalizable humanoid loco-manipulation. It preserves pre-trained world-action priors while grounding heterogeneous whole-body controller (WBC) semantics and coordinating whole-body behavior. Extensive experiments show that WholeBodyWAM achieves an overall simulation task success rate of 91.9%, with a 0.23 improvement in real-world out-of-distribution task progress and a 70% reduction in success-rate variance across WBCs relative to the respective baselines. These results suggest a path toward scalable humanoid whole-body intelligence by extending pre-trained world-action priors through structured WBC grounding and coordination, rather than relearning whole-body behavior from scratch. Project page: https://wholebodywam.github.io/.

Automatic Related Work Generation (RWG) significantly reduces the human time and effort required to author the Related Work Section (RWS) of a research paper. However, prior methods leveraging multi-agent Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on a predefined workflow, where each agent is responsible for a specific step in the entire process. This rigid, static inter-agent coordination limits the adaptive collaboration required to synthesize complex scientific literature. To address this limitation, we propose CREW (Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Related Work Generation), a novel framework where LLM agents bypass heuristic pipelines to dynamically coordinate by autonomously selecting actions, such as Retrieve, Disseminate, Compose, and Critique, driven by a policy optimized via Independent Proximal Policy Optimization (IPPO). Extensive experiments on a standard RWG benchmark demonstrate that our approach yields substantial quality improvements over strong existing baselines, while significantly reducing token costs. Code is available at https://github.com/YenPBao/CREW-Collaborative-MARL.git

Effective communication is a cornerstone of distributed intelligence in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), yet ensuring that generated messages are both informative and robust to physical constraints remains a significant challenge. This paper introduces Multi-Agent Regularized Communication (MARC), a novel framework inspired by information-theoretic principles of conditional mutual information. MARC employs an attention-based architecture coupled with a unique message regularization mechanism designed to minimize uncertainty regarding future system states, thereby inducing the learning of highly representative communication protocols. Crucially, we evaluate MARC under stringent communication bottlenecks and lossy channels, simulating the real-world constraints of autonomous robotic networks and decentralized systems. Our results demonstrate that MARC significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in complex cooperative domains. Furthermore, we provide a deep analysis of message characteristics, proving that MARC maintains high operational performance even under significant data compression, offering a scalable path for deploying intelligent agents in resource-constrained environments.

Large language model (LLM) driven multi-agent systems have shown promise in complex clinical reasoning, yet existing approaches rely on static strategies and lack persistent clinical memory, preventing self-evolving from prior diagnostic successes and failures. We present EMR, a self-evolving medical multi-agent system via Experience Mining and Reuse. EMR introduces a hierarchical clinical experience library that organizes accumulated knowledge into three levels: clinical principles, diagnostic patterns, and representative cases. During inference, EMR emulates multidisciplinary consultation: a planner agent coordinates domain-specific department agents for specialized reasoning, while a summary agent synthesizes their analyses into a final decision. Critically, EMR automatically extracts correct diagnostic insights and failure-related warnings from multi-agent reasoning trajectories, incrementally updating the experience library to guide future cases. Experiments on medical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that EMR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art medical multi-agent baselines. Further analysis reveals that the hierarchical experience enables cross-specialty generalization and transfer across diverse LLM backbones, offering a scalable and in

Multi-Agent (MA) systems are effective at solving complex tasks that demand planning, tool use, and the synthesis of evidence from multiple sources. Existing systems typically adopt Hierarchical Manager-Worker (HMW) or Router-based Message Passing (RMP) structures as their communication protocol. However, these designs restrict agent autonomy: Worker agents cannot directly consult specific "peers", and misrouted messages can propagate errors. Inspired by bus architectures in computer systems, we propose BusMA, a communication framework that allows any agent to address other agents through a shared channel, i.e., the Bus. It consists of agent registration, message routing, and shared memory management components. Worker agents, each equipped with tools, have their own local memory and can reason, act (tool usage), and communicate by posting shared messages with specific intents. We introduce four intents: discussion, challenge, guidance, and request for explanation, which support fine-grained communication among agents. A Chair agent monitors the shared memory to coordinate interactions and facilitate convergence among Workers. To evaluate the effectiveness of BusMA, we conduct extensive experiments with two frontier LLMs across 13 tasks spanning visual reasoning, mathematical reasoning, and knowledge retrieval demonstrate that BusMA consistently outperforms state-of-the-art HMW and RMP methods.

Designing effective memory mechanisms is crucial for advancing LLM-driven Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), helping agents learn together and perform better over time. While recent work has led to strong cooperation skills, most methods still use flat, unstructured memories, which easily get filled with noise and erase differences between agents. To address this, we introduce the concept of collective-individual memory synergy and propose CoMem, an architecture that unifies both private experience and shared knowledge for multi-agent learning. CoMem features:(i) Private Experience Sedimentation, which lets each agent keep and update its own useful memories over time;(ii) Collective Wisdom Curation, which carefully selects only widely proven ideas to be shared among agents;(iii)Parallel Dual-Stream Retrieval, which allows agents to draw both from their own memory and the group's wisdom, using clustering to ensure diversity.Experiments on ALFWorld and PDDL benchmarks show that CoMem achieves strong overall performance and robustly avoids memory pollution.

Functional integration is a growing trend in vehicle control, often involving the coordination of multiple controllers to achieve various objectives simultaneously. The need for flexibility and reliability has led to a "plug-and-play" approach in control system design, which presents challenges for traditional integrated model predictive control (MPC). Agent-based model predictive control (AMPC) has recently emerged as a distributed solution that treats controllers as agents, creating a collaborative framework among them to reach a common goal. However, this approach struggles to manage distributed conflicting objectives when agents are coupled or interdependent. To address this, we propose a novel, practical distributed control scheme called multi-objective AMPC, which adapts the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) into a general control strategy that approximates global optimization while decoupling objectives. We systematically develop three formulations that maintain convergence while addressing control regularization and inequality constraints, applying them to complex vehicle control systems for the first time. The proposed method has been tested on two vehicle control scenarios with a multi-objective topology. Different formulations are compared through simulations, and the most computationally efficient one was implemented on an electric vehicle for real-world evaluations. The results demonstrate that the proposed multi-objective AMPC can converge approximately to the same global optimum as integrated MPC with greater flexibility and the potential to reduce computational costs.

Between 24 May and 2 July 2026, autonomous language-model agents running inside a timed research-question evaluation wrote to a third party's public, world-writable wiki. OpenAI acknowledged the incident; independent researchers reconstructed it and published the wiki's archived revision history. We analyse that history (14,591 revisions, 3,103 names, 4,579 pages, 19,913 server events) as a behavioural record, attributing text to the revision that added it rather than to cumulative page content. Under an explicit identity model we reconstruct 907 cohorts and, from a random calendar marker the environment attached to each episode, estimate about 876 episodes (95% interval 774-995; alternative reconstructions span 800-1400). Coordination formats converged within a day, and the schedules created large opportunities for information asymmetry: because episodes of the same question chain ran at different internal-clock rates and started up to 16 h apart, the first report of an item preceded a later cohort's arrival by a median of 3.4 h. The three schedule parameters agents reported share one latent speed scale (78% of log-variance over 15 configurations), and in one task family the last observed activity clusters by reported speed class on the internal clock, compatible with a fixed internal-time horizon. Across the 510 cohorts with an observable, format-dependent progress trace, we find no robust positive association between measured coordination and documented progress, including the few demonstrably given a future answer. Because the export contains neither successful-read logs, harness messages nor ground-truth outcomes, these results do not identify the causal origin of the coordination or its effect. We report four claims from our earlier analysis that did not survive re-examination, and argue that read and outcome logging are requirements for agent-evaluation environments.

This work considers multi-agent coordination with arbitrary information networks among the agents using a game-theoretic approach. A system designer aims to assign local utility functions to the agents to guide their actions toward a desired system objective. The performance of the assigned local utilities is measured by the well known pure price of anarchy (pPoA) metric that equals the ratio of the system objective at the worst pure Nash equilibrium of the corresponding game to the optimal system objective. Our aim is to derive the utility functions which optimize the pPoA-based performance guarantees for any given information network and system objective. We develop a linear program that derives the optimal pPoA for any arbitrary information network and arbitrary system objective. Our work is the first to solve optimal utility design for arbitrary networks; our techniques generalize previous approaches which considered only the full-information setting. For supermodular objective functions, we prove that counterintuitively, a fully communication-denied utility design is optimal irrespective of the original information network. For submodular system objectives, an exhaustive numerical analysis suggests that the optimal utility design is robust to communication failures even for this case. When the system objective is weighted maximum coverage, the marginal contribution utility design provably optimizes the pPoA for a wide variety of information networks of interest.

Agent-based model predictive control (AMPC) has recently been proposed for vehicle systems with various controllers, such as differential braking and torque vectoring, where controllers are regarded as distributed agents contributing to the same objective. However, this scheme is challenging in handling multiple conflicting objectives with coupled agents. A common approach for such tasks is the integrated MPC, where all objectives and agents are stacked together in one optimization. Nevertheless, as more agents and objectives are involved, the integrated MPC will face challenges like computational burdens and maintenance difficulties in practice. To this end, this paper proposes a learning multi-objective AMPC that can improve design flexibility and computing efficiency. First, under the assumption of information exchange, a multi-objective AMPC tailored from the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is proposed to decouple the system and achieve the same performance as the integrated scheme iteratively. Second, a learning-based method for initializing iterations is proposed to accelerate convergence. In addition, a data management method is proposed for real-time efficiency, and an authentication module is designed for learning reliability. We compare the proposed scheme against the integrated scheme via a combined path-tracking simulation for autonomous vehicles with various controllers. The proposed scheme achieves the same control performance as the integrated one while reducing the computational time by 43.5%. Furthermore, the learning-based method saves 88.6% more computational time than without learning, making it suitable for real-time implementation.

Multimodal model merging aims to consolidate task experts into a single model that retains their complementary capabilities. Most unimodal model merging methods combine expert updates within individual layers, and multimodal approaches largely follow this design. However, an expert update changes the representations passed to subsequent layers, allowing its influence to propagate across depth and affect how visual and textual information interact. When visual and language updates are combined, later updates act on inputs already modified by earlier ones, coupling their effects. This poses two challenges: (1) how to characterize the multimodal influence of individual expert updates across depth, and (2) how to jointly combine expert updates based on their multimodal influence. To address these challenges, we propose TAC-Merge for tracing and coordinating cross-layer influence in multimodal model merging. It contains two modules, i.e., multimodal influence mapping (MIM) and coupled merge control (CMC). MIM constructs graphs of update effects and uses Ricci curvature together with expert predictions to define a shared fusion objective. CMC models interactions among coefficient adjustments and jointly optimizes regional weights to synthesize one shared model. Experiments across diverse multimodal tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of TAC-Merge in consolidating complementary expert capabilities and supporting generalization to unseen tasks.

Autonomous network management requires systems that can evaluate Network Service Intents (NSIs) under varying conditions without manual implementation of analysis logic, as envisioned in TM Forum Level~4 (L4) autonomy. Behavioral Network Digital Twins (NDTs) enable such evaluation, but existing NDTs rely on pre-defined analytical logic, limiting adaptability for evolving closed-loop control. This paper introduces the NDT factory, a multi-agent software system that synthesizes executable behavioral NDTs on demand from semantic models using Large Language Model (LLM). We validate the system using a Call Admission Control (CAC) case study, where deterministic what-if analysis serves as the admission decision process. The NDT factory generates a complete CAC NDT through parallel synthesis and orchestration, achieving 100% compilation and test pass rates across multiple runs. Simulation over 300 NSIs shows 99.3% decision agreement with a reference implementation, 90% admission rate, and correct attribution of all rejections, demonstrating reliable synthesis with deterministic, verifiable execution.

A notable byproduct of LLM alignment training is mode collapse: the progressive loss of output diversity that narrows a model's expressivity at inference time. This degradation is especially limiting for applications requiring open-ended exploration and pluralistic perspectives, such as scientific ideation and creative writing. We present MoDA (Mode-conditioned Diversity Alignment), an online post-training RL algorithm that jointly optimizes generation quality and diversity, inspired by the coordination perspective in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). MoDA trains a single shared LLM policy conditioned on abstract numbered roles, where each role acts as an agent competing to produce outputs distinct from the others. This formulation encourages mode-conditioned agents to explore complementary regions of the high-quality output space without requiring hand-crafted personas or architectural modifications. MoDA employs a prompt-adaptive quality gating mechanism that calibrates a reference quality threshold and grants diversity rewards only to responses that meet the threshold, preventing reward-hacking behaviors that compromise response quality. To study quality-diversity tradeoffs, we evaluate MoDA on a comprehensive suite of benchmarks spanning seven general capability tasks and four domain-specific diversity tasks in scientific ideation and creative writing. MoDA improves SBERT diversity by 265% on the Infinite-Chat held-out prompts, while increasing average general capability pass@1 by 10.3% over the Qwen3-8B baseline. Compared with the strongest DivPO baseline, MoDA improves SBERT diversity from 0.274 to 0.482 (+75.9%) and E-Vendi from 2.86 to 4.4 (+53.8%), while improving average general capability pass@1 by 7.0%. Overall, MoDA provides a drop-in alternative to standard post-training methods that preserves and expands the model's expressive output space while improving quality.

Hierarchical orchestration, in which a Manager agent reviews worker output and can send it back for revision, is the default coordination pattern in production multi-agent LLM frameworks. Classical organizational theory predicts that the authority link speeds convergence on decisive output; work on sycophancy and Degeneration-of-Thought predicts that authoritative critique makes LLM output worse. Prior comparisons vary whole frameworks on tasks with checkable answers, leaving the authority link untested on open-ended work. We present a paired experiment that holds five LLM agents, their roles, prompts, tools, models, and data fixed and varies one link: whether the Manager may reject a worker's output and oblige a revision. Across 43 paired products and 86 runs of a business-intelligence reporting task, a five-model judge panel and a deterministic specification check score every report. The flat organization scores higher on Utility (d = 0.42, p = 0.009) and on Writing Clarity (d = 0.34, p = 0.030); the classical prediction fails. The reports are the same length, but hierarchical reports hedge 53% more, each revision loop is associated with a 0.14-point drop in Writing Clarity, and the hierarchical Writer's first draft is indistinguishable from the flat report: the gap opens inside the revision loop. Specification accuracy is at ceiling in both organizations, and the supervisory tier costs 51.5% more tokens for no quality gain. A supervisor pays for itself when it can verify and becomes a liability when it can only opine.

Sparse DNN accelerators specialize in ANN or SNN execution, leaving energy or latency on the table when workload characteristics vary within a layer. Hybrid accelerator designs that switch modes at layer or tile granularity suffer from low PE utilization since one core type idles whenever the other is active. NeuroFlex is the first accelerator to assign every output element independently to ANN or SNN execution mode with zero accuracy loss. We extend integer-exact ANN-SNN equivalence from layers to individual output elements, thereby enabling mode switching with no conversion error. An offline cost-guided scheduler scores each element by its marginal energy-delay trade-off and packs work across PEs, achieving 97-99% PE utilization compared to 40-45% for layer-wise hybrids. NeuroFlex reduces EDP by 57-67% over a strong ANN-only baseline and delivers up to 2.5x speedup over a dual-sparse SNN-only baseline. Our cost-guided scheduler improves throughput by 16-19% over random element assignment across vision, language, and transformer workloads.

How does cooperation evolve in complex agentic systems? Prior work in evolutionary game theory studies why individuals are incentivized to cooperate by isolating social interactions from the physical costs of behavior, while artificial life models traditionally study emergent self-replication without formalizing the dilemma between acquiring resources and preserving the shared energy needed to reproduce. In contrast, we introduce Autopoietic Game Theory, a computational model where social interactions, replication mechanisms, and their associated computational costs are endogenous and simultaneously co-evolving. We study these dynamics using a computational substrate of randomly initialized programs in Z80 machine code, showing empirically, and motivating with a simplified theoretical model, that embedding a social dilemma directly into the physics of computation can favor the emergence of self-replicating, cooperative strategies. When resources are scarce, our analysis shows that defection can become self-limiting even in well-mixed populations: parasitic stealing destroys shared energy, slows execution, and can prevent reliable replication. Empirically, evolved programs suppress stealing across several Z80 environments, while spatial assortment further supports structural complexity and task performance. We further show that the framework can incorporate exogenous pressures, such as math tasks structured as sequential social dilemmas, when rewards are tied to computation budgets. These results suggest that coupling an agent's capacity for computation to its available energy transforms cooperation into a dominant scaffolding for building sustainable, self-organizing systems.

Autonomous research agents are increasingly expected to search the literature, analyze experimental evidence, and generate scientific hypotheses. These capabilities require multi-step evidence grounded reasoning that progressively acquires, integrates, and verifies evidence before reaching a conclusion. Existing multimodal benchmarks, however, largely evaluate final-answer accuracy, leaving open whether predictions are actually supported by traceable scientific evidence. We introduce Sci-MMR, a benchmark for multi-step evidence-grounded scientific reasoning built on structured argument graphs linking scientific claims, citation-grounded knowledge, visual evidence, and supporting regions. Sci-MMR comprises 235 multi-hop reasoning tasks spanning four scientific disciplines, with an average of nine figure panels per task. Evaluating eight frontier multimodal models, we find that answer accuracy consistently exceeds complete-evidence recovery rate by more than 20%, revealing a substantial gap that answer-only evaluation is structurally unable to capture. Through controlled interventions, we identify two fundamental bottlenecks. First, evidence acquisition: models struggle to extract complete structured evidence from scientific figures, accounting for 57.2% of failures. While cropping tools yield modest gains (+4.5 points), providing gold evidence improves accuracy by up to 37.0 points, indicating difficulty in assembling complete multi-region evidence. Second, evidence integration: models struggle to translate available evidence into correct conclusions, accounting for 31.8% of failures, while even with gold evidence the strongest model achieves only 69.1% accuracy on the hardest tasks. These findings indicate that current answer-centric benchmarks substantially overestimate the evidence-grounded reasoning capabilities of multimodal research agents

When multiple LLM agents yield conflicting answers, the decision-making process dictates whether agent diversity improves performance or merely compounds shared errors. Existing collective decision-making methods, including voting, electoral rules, and LLM judges, rely on forward reasoning: they map evidence to labels in one direction. Although these methods can combine diverse forward traces, they still aggregate estimates that share this evidence-to-label factorization and can inherit correlated errors within the forward pool. We therefore construct a reverse posterior for each instance through Bayesian backward reasoning from an explicit likelihood. The forward and reverse posteriors provide differently factorized approximations of the underlying posterior. Because estimates from different factorizations may tend to share the same error less often, we use Jensen-Shannon divergence to rank agents by cross-path consistency. This cross-path consistency signal underlies three strategies: hard selection (MinJS), soft reweighting (FwdJS), and log-linear fusion (LogLin). Evaluated on DDXPlus across five LLM backbones, our proposed strategies show consistent improvements: MinJS outperforms random selection across all backbones, FwdJS generally improves over the strongest baseline, and LogLin achieves the best performance among the evaluated methods, with its largest gains on the subset where the agents disagree. Despite its weaker standalone accuracy, the reverse posterior serves as a more useful anchor than forward-only alternatives, providing complementary information for collective decision-making. When labeled data are available, a lightweight two-stage calibration can further refine the reverse anchor and improve aggregation performance.

Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm for complex decision-making in autonomous systems and air combat. While MARL has demonstrated significant potential in air combat, achieving sophisticated tactical coordination remains a non-trivial challenge. This difficulty is largely attributed to two primary limitations: (1) the absence of structured relational modeling hinders agents from capturing complex, time-varying interactions among battlefield entities; and (2) conventional flat architectures often lack the capability to explicitly model tactical roles, leading to ambiguous task allocation in highly dynamic environments. To address these challenges, we propose Hierarchical Dynamic Role-Graph Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (DRG-MAPPO), a novel MARL framework that integrates graph-based relational modeling with dynamic role assignment. Specifically, DRG-MAPPO constructs a graph-based representation of battlefield interactions and leverages graph attention mechanisms to extract critical relational features among allies, enemies, and threats. Subsequently, a high-level policy employs a dynamic role assignment mechanism to determine tactical responsibilities (e.g., leader'' and supporter''). Conditioned on these roles and encoded graph-relational features, a low-level policy executes discrete maneuver actions, facilitating the joint optimization of tactical strategy and collaborative execution. Furthermore, a target-priority auxiliary task is designed to foster the emergence of behaviors such as focus-fire. Experimental results demonstrate that DRG-MAPPO achieves a state-of-the-art win rate of 87%, suggesting that our framework effectively balances relational modeling, interpretability, and optimization stability for cooperative air combat.

AI shopping assistants increasingly redirect consumer discovery, creating an urgent need for tools that support seller-side competitive decision-making. We present a multi-agent AI system that automates competitive visibility measurement and root cause diagnosis in LLM-mediated ecommerce. The system introduces Agentic Share-of-Search (ASoS) as the decision target, deploys query agents across leading AI platforms, and uses a ReAct-based diagnostic agent to recommend prioritized merchandising interventions. A 100-trial ablation study, presented as a feasibility evaluation of this prototype, shows the agent recovers the ablated signal in 39% of trials (95% CI: 30.0% - 48.8%, 5.5x over chance), rising to 63.9% among high-correlation ablations.

Multi-agent robotic manipulation tasks require coordination among agents to satisfy task-level temporal, logical, and safety constraints. Recently, diffusion policies have been used to perform the task. However, they still suffer from desynchronization, incorrect action ordering, and coordination failures in tasks that require simultaneous or sequential multi-agent interaction. Therefore, LTLDiff is proposed as a framework that combines Finite Linear Temporal Logic (LTLf) specification learning for both the generation of demonstrations and learning via diffusion policies. Each task has a specific LTLf formula that is learned from a set of natural language instructions using a large-scale language model. To enable a fixed-dimensional vector embedding of the learned specification from the language model, LTLf uses an abstract syntax tree representation scheme. This embedding of logic serves as a condition for (i) logic-guided data collection and (ii) diffusion-based policy training, encouraging trajectories that are consistent with the desired ordering and coordination requirements. Experiments on multi-agent LTLDiff manipulation tasks demonstrate improved task success rates compared to the baseline. Together, these contributions demonstrate the effectiveness of LTLDiff for coordinated multi-agent manipulation.

Agent-based model predictive control (AMPC) has recently been proposed as a distributed scheme that collaborates with all agents to achieve optimal holistic performance. However, its optimality highly depends on the prediction accuracy that requires all agents or their contributions to be known, which is too idealistic for actual implementation. This research proposes a novel practical hybrid control scheme - learning agent-based MPC (LAMPC), combining the model-based AMPC approach and data-based learning methods to improve the holistic vehicle performance for multi-agent systems. The Gaussian process regression (GPR) enhanced by an online data management strategy serves as the learning core to predict unknown contributions. A novel multi-step prediction mechanism leverages the GPR learning potential along the horizon. The predicted mean, representing the learned unknown contributions, completes the system model in the MPC for more accurate control. Meanwhile, a stochastic framework is formulated to guarantee control safety and feasibility using soft chance constraints based on the prediction variance. Both simulations and experiments show that, with the learning capability, LAMPC outperforms the traditional AMPC. LAMPC can achieve higher tracking performance in well-learned scenarios and always guarantee constraint satisfaction even in less-learned scenarios. Moreover, the proposed hybrid control scheme is efficient for real-time implementation and is flexible to any control agent topology.

Collective intelligence depends not only on the capabilities of individual members, but also on how those members are organized. Yet artificial multi-agent systems are typically assembled using fixed organizational structures, even when the physical tasks they perform impose fundamentally different coordination requirements. Here we show that principles from human organization theory can be operationalized to organize large, heterogeneous collectives of embodied artificial agents. We introduce ORCH (Organizing Roles and Coordination Hierarchies), which constructs task-specific hierarchical organizations by combining pooled interdependence for work that can proceed concurrently with sequential interdependence for work governed by prerequisite relationships. Across 25 wildfire-response missions spanning reconnaissance, rescue, transportation, resource management, containment and suppression, we evaluated teams of up to 50 heterogeneous agents using eight large language models. Organizations constructed using these principles consistently outperformed four representative embodied multi-agent approaches across mission outcome, execution efficiency, exploration and computational resource use. Human-designed ORCH organizations improved final score by 63.97% and execution efficiency by 74.29% on average relative to the four prior frameworks. Organizations generated automatically by language models improved these measures by 43.63% and 52.53%, respectively. These advantages persisted across missions and underlying language models. Notably, collective performance was not monotonically determined by model scale. Analysis of long-horizon missions showed that hierarchical organization enabled teams to preserve concurrent activity within specialized groups while coordinating ordered transitions between mission phases.

Agentic graph learning (AGL) has recently achieved promising results on graph reasoning tasks, where an agent powered by a large language model (LLM) sequentially samples the graph as evidence to support its final prediction. Existing methods either employ a single agent or orchestrate multiple role-based agents to reason and learn over the entire graph, but both essentially rely on a shared reasoning policy across different graph regions, which can be suboptimal for graphs with heterogeneous structural and semantic patterns. Inspired by the progress of multi-agent collaboration on complex reasoning tasks, a natural remedy is to let multiple agents own different memory and collaborate; however, applying this paradigm to graphs directly faces two challenges. First, existing AGL methods typically verbalize graph structures into natural-language descriptions for LLM agents, making the reasoning process sensitive to the ordering of structural information and thereby breaking the permutation-invariant nature of graphs. Second, incorporating increasingly large sampled neighborhoods leads to rapidly growing contexts. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a multi-agent agentic graph learning (i.e., MAAGL) framework. MAAGL partitions the graph into communities and assigns an independent agent to each community for region-specific specialization. MAAGL represents structural and semantic evidence separately. Structural evidence is summarized by a dynamically updated structural signature that is permutation-invariant and fixed in size, while semantic evidence is filtered to the top-k nodes ranked by relevance. Based on historical trajectories with similar signatures, agents estimate their confidence and trigger debate-style collaboration when needed. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets show that MAAGL outperforms SOTA AGL methods.

This study develops a deep reinforcement learning framework for training Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) agents to navigate and monitor simulated wildfire environments. Results show that agents learn increasingly stable and effective behaviors over time, as demonstrated by converging loss trends, improved reward signals, and more consistent navigation patterns such as fire-boundary tracking. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based UAV systems for autonomous wildfire monitoring and suggest that environmental structure and reward design influence policy effectiveness.

Recent controllable speech generation requires training data with fine-grained annotations of speaker traits, prosody, emotion, paralinguistic cues, acoustic scenes, and context. Existing workflows often rely on manual correction, paid hosted multimodal services, or fixed processing chains, which limits large-scale data processing through annotation cost, external-service dependence, or weak cross-stage recovery. We introduce SpeechAnnotator, a locally deployable, context-aware multi-agent framework built entirely from open-source models and tools. Supporting frontend modules first obtain speaker-aware segments and final segment transcripts, while prior evidence extractors attach heterogeneous segment-level cues. Three specialist agents then collaborate through shared state: the Planning Agent converts local audio evidence, speaker history, neighboring segments, and recording-level context into field-specific contracts; the Labeling Agent performs contract-guided multimodal prediction for directly observable attributes; and the Review Agent runs a bounded review loop that checks evidence support and cross-segment consistency, triggering relabeling only for unsupported or inconsistent fields. To address the fragmentation of existing evaluation resources across isolated tasks and narrow-domain test sets, we introduce SpeechAnnotator-Bench (SA-Bench), containing 8.87 hours of human-annotated audio across nine source formats, together with SpeechAnnotator-Eval (SA-Eval), which separates Timeline-Eval for speaker-aware timeline recovery, Closed-Eval for finite-set attributes, and Open-Eval for open-ended attributes. Experiments and ablations show that SpeechAnnotator provides a locally deployable alternative to commercial audio-capable systems, while the bounded review loop improves multidimensional annotation through evidence- and context-aware field-level recovery.

Inferring speaker relationships from spoken conversations is an important step towards socially aware speech understanding. However, this task remains underexplored, and supervised modeling is costly to train and scale. At the same time, existing inference-time LLM approaches provide limited structure for handling subtle, distributed, and multimodal relational cues that may support multiple plausible interpretations. To address these limitations, we introduce a training-free multi-agent reasoning framework that organizes inference through structured interaction among LLM agents, allowing relationship judgments to be proposed, challenged, and adjudicated without task-specific training. We instantiate this framework with two complementary designs. We propose Multi-Role Multi-Agent Debate as a task-specific adaptation of standard multi-agent debate for speaker relationship inference, assigning agents complementary roles or social-theory-grounded perspectives rather than a single undifferentiated viewpoint. In contrast, we introduce Multi-Agent Compete, a competition-based protocol that compares agent judgments through pairwise adjudication, eliminates weaker candidates, and retains the most defensible one. We evaluate these methods on the Seamless Interaction dataset across different modality settings, covering both binary classification and fine-grained relationship-detail prediction. Results suggest that they improve over zero-shot and existing multi-agent baselines in most cases. Human evaluation further suggests that this task is challenging even for people. LLM methods can sometimes outperform human annotators in text-included settings but are less competitive in the audio setting. Together, these findings suggest that relationship inference benefits from structured inference-time interaction among agents, while acoustic cues are not yet fully captured by current models.

This paper addresses safety-critical coordination for scalar agents whose distributed commands are implemented through constrained physical-input dynamics. Agents communicate over a fixed weighted digraph with a directed spanning tree, while their outputs must remain inside a common moving safety corridor and their realized inputs must satisfy heterogeneous asymmetric bounds. We propose a networked Admissibility-Preserving Control (APC) architecture in which an Admissibility-Preserving Input Realization (APIR) governs physical inputs and a logarithmic barrier coordinate represents the safety corridor. The synthesis yields an exact cascade in which exponentially decaying realization errors drive nonsymmetric consensus dynamics. For every compatible compact initial set, the closed-loop system admits a unique complete solution, renders the moving corridor and actuator intervals forward invariant with uniform margins, keeps commands bounded, and achieves exponential consensus. We derive direction-specific sufficient conditions under which positive and negative control demands remain within their corresponding actuator limits. The analysis yields a closed-form barrier-coordinate limit determined by the left Perron vector and initial APIR mismatch. Under strong connectivity and the stated gain and compatibility conditions, partial pinning propagates a constant barrier reference from a nonempty informed subset and assigns the induced safety corridor trajectory. A non-weight-balanced example illustrates the directional certificate and predicted collective motion.

Modern science and engineering increasingly rely on time-varying data, yet the mathematical tools used to model temporal phenomena are often developed within separate disciplines, obscuring common principles and limiting the transfer of ideas across fields. This chapter presents the theory of narratives, an abstract framework for time-varying objects of any mathematical kind that supports both theoretical investigations and applications. To illustrate this perspective, the chapter develops three vignettes, each illustrating a different research direction. The first addresses a general concern: What information loss can occur when switching between different representations of temporal data? The second concerns structural and algorithmic approaches: How can we systematically decompose time-varying data into simple pieces and obtain invariants describing its structural complexity? The third is an application to control theory: How can we model multi-agent systems with switching communication topologies? More important than any individual vignette, the central message of this invitation is that a suitable abstract perspective can organize and guide research across remarkably diverse mathematical and scientific domains.

This paper presents a graph-based safe multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) framework for cooperative navigation with time-varying topology. To address the critical challenge of ensuring safety in environments with sensing constraints, a safety-decoupled mechanism is introduced through a Control Barrier-Like Function (CBLF) action screening layer. This mechanism bridges the gap between discrete LiDAR perception and continuous safety constraints, ensuring that physical safety constraints are strictly satisfied regardless of the learning progress. Building upon this safety foundation, a unified structural architecture is proposed, integrating a attention-based actor and a Graph Attention Network (GAT) centralized critic. The actor utilizes a value vector reconstruction mechanism that explicitly encodes relative geometric relations through a collaborative tracking error matrix, enabling scale-insensitive policy learning under time-varying communication topologies. Meanwhile, the GAT-based critic models evolving interaction structures for accurate global value estimation. The proposed framework is validated on real differential-drive robot platforms, and experimental results demonstrate superior stability and safety in dynamic scenarios with limited fields-of-view.

Organoids are three-dimensional tissue models whose morphology provides important insights into tumor development, disease progression, and drug testing. Extracting these morphological features relies heavily on manual segmentation, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Furthermore, performing quantitative statistical analysis typically requires custom coding skills and a mathematical background, presenting a major barrier for experimental biologists. To address these challenges, we introduce MorphoOrgaAgent, a multi-agent framework that achieves zero-shot organoid segmentation, automated data analysis, and report generation based on natural language input. The framework consists mainly of three core components: a TaskUnderstandingAgent that identifies requested measurements and visualization types; a hybrid segmentation module that combines Cellpose-derived geometric prompts with text prompts to guide SAM3 for zero-shot organoid instance segmentation; and a ReportAgent that computes quantitative metrics and compiles them alongside generated visualizations into a structured report. We further introduce MorphoOrgaVQA, a benchmark designed for quantitative evaluation of agent systems in organoid morphology analysis. Experimental results demonstrate that MorphoOrgaAgent handles both explicit and descriptive user requests, produces measurements closely matching ground truth, and generates complete analysis reports without requiring manual programming. The complete source code and MorphoOrgaVQA benchmark are publicly available at https://github.com/peng-lab/MorphoOrgaAgent.

Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) achieve strong performance by employing specialized multiple agents, yet their performance depends on the prompt design of each agent. For MAS prompt optimization, textual gradient methods that guide prompt updates using natural-language feedback have emerged as a leading paradigm. In this paper, we identify limitations in two stages of existing textual gradient approaches: gradient extraction and gradient aggregation. In gradient extraction, previous works select a target prompt without verifying whether modifying it resolves the failure, and derive gradients without agent-level supervision over the corresponding agent's intermediate output. In gradient aggregation, individual gradients are randomly grouped and concatenated, often mixing unrelated failure modes and producing prompts that fail to generalize. To address these limitations, we propose \textbf{AgentGrad}, a prompt optimization framework for multi-agent systems based on sequential intervention and semantic textual gradient abstraction. For each failure, sequential intervention modifies the behavior of one agent at a time to identify the target agent whose modification resolves the failure. The modified output of the target agent then serves as agent-level supervision for extracting a fine-grained gradient. Semantic textual gradient abstraction clusters semantically similar gradients to prevent mixing unrelated failure modes, and abstracts each cluster into a generalized gradient that captures the shared corrective pattern. Experimental results show that AgentGrad achieves state-of-the-art performance across five MAS benchmarks and reduces wall-clock optimization time by $2.5\times$ on average compared to the next-fastest baseline.

Agentic systems persist model-visible memory while mutating workspaces, while a runtime, registry, or approval service may hold authority state outside both. Identical final files can then require opposite safe actions. We call this the cross-substrate authority gap: decision- relevant authorization information resides outside the planner-visible workspace or memory state. Across two controlled mini-benchmark families, three experiments compare planner-observation augmentation with an execution-time authority check using real Git lineage, durably recorded agent execution attempts, deterministic oracles, and two model routes. Experiment 1 is a 128-cell controlled evidence ablation: authority-blind candidate evidence obtains 0/32 final semantic success, while raw receipts and a typed relation both obtain 32/32. The missing authority fact accounts for the gain; typed packaging provides no observed planning-accuracy gain over equal raw information. Experiment 2 uses 96 planning calls: workspace-visible evidence yields 12/16 unsafe publication decisions, and planning with the typed relation remains unreliable (15/32 first actions correct; 11/32 invalid or absent). Experiment 3 replays the same 32 fixed model-generated first-action intents with zero additional model calls; a deterministic execution guard prevents all six unsafe intents from becoming effects and permits all 12 valid authorized publish intents. These results position authority enforcement at the mutation boundary as the operational endpoint of memory governance.

Current LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) periodically compress intermediate states to reduce inference-time token consumption, thereby attempting to incorporate more agents. However, naive scaling strategies face challenges. For example, in economic simulations, large-scale MAS typically discard semantically rich economic states, i.e., agent behavioral trajectories, which are key drivers of macroeconomic fluctuations. In this paper, we reveal a phenomenon in which agent heterogeneity gradually decreases during simulation, and propose Prospect-State Propagation for Multi-Agent Systems (PspMAS). Inspired by prospect theory, PspMAS decouples each agent's micro state into a compact Prospect State and an expressive Semantic State. The former records psychological traces through a lightweight, parallelizable propagator and continuously injects heterogeneity into the system. The latter leverages the strong perception, reasoning, planning, and decision-making abilities of LLMs. These two components work complementarily, providing a scalable LLM-based multi-agent simulation solution.

Multi-agent federations need governance that answers three questions under adversarial conditions: who participated (identity), did they conform (enforcement), and who decides (authority). A separate question is whether the verification machinery that polices a federation's outputs can also steer a generate-and-test loop toward better answers. Part I. PRIMA introduced prime-power agent identity and a consensus token whose factorization indexes participation, but assumed honest agents. We present PRIMUS, which couples prime-power identity with BLS aggregate signatures (PIAC), derives a safe-kill threshold that reduces false-positive agent termination from 80% to 0.00% under 10% channel noise, gives the closed-form economic boundary where singleton governance outperforms Byzantine quorum ($γ^* \approx 9f$, verified flat across n = 50 to 10,000), and specifies VRF succession with lease and fencing that makes safety unconditional under partial synchrony. Five problems are identified as provably unfixable within the model and stated as scope boundaries. Part II. A verifier is not a solver. We ask whether PRIMA's binary artifact-fidelity verdict can be converted into a graded fitness signal, and measure the conversion on binary covering codes. Calibration against injected fault burden is strong ($ρ$ = 0.676 deterministic, 0.819 full); against real LLM-generated candidates the same scores fall to 0.158 and 0.406, roughly a quarter of the calibration value (the same-designer confound, measured). As a pre-filter it beats a random-score control convincingly and a binary gate narrowly. Under 400 iterations of explicit optimization it was not gamed, but only because the objective saturated after one honest answer. A cross-family judge preserves the burden-ordering signal while destroying individual judgments. No covering-code record resulted. Measured program cost: USD 164.78.

In electric delivery fleets, mid-shift charging is non-trivial: each vehicle must decide when, where and how much to charge to finish on time with battery above a safety floor. The choices are coupled: queues build where too many vehicles pick the same station. Prior work resolves this coupling with central dispatching, precomputed schedules or reservations, machinery that charging infrastructure rarely supports. Instead, we use a family of learning agents under purely local control: every vehicle runs the same policy, deciding alone from its time budgets and broadcast station occupancies, leading to emergent coordination without central control or messaging. We validate this paradigm in simulation on real OpenStreetMap networks of twenty cities, each with a frozen scenario calibrated by an omniscient Oracle (99.5% of shifts completed on time), whereas a naive greedy rule (nearest station on low battery) completes just 73%. Agents trained with neuroevolution (NEAT) and policy gradients (PPO) on four cities and deployed zero-shot across all twenty, sixteen never seen in training, complete 96.8% and 98.6% of shifts, with the policy-gradient controllers proving more robust when demand or vehicle characteristics drift beyond the trained regime. In contrast, tuned threshold heuristics that read vehicle urgency alone fall short in contended cities (~80%). Through training, these learning agents rediscover partial charging and short opportunistic sessions, and route around busy stations, cutting per-session queue waits from about 45 minutes to under 2. In summary, this coordination paradigm balances local urgency against public occupancy, reaching near-Oracle performance at minimal implementation cost.

Environments are increasingly populated by multiple robots performing independent tasks with limited prior knowledge of each other. Deploying such multi-agent systems presents significant challenges. Specifically, shifts in deployment states compared to training data can lead to poor policy performance and compromised safety. While safety shields exist to mitigate these risks, they are typically reactive, which degrades performance near unseen obstacles,and centralized, limiting their scalability. To address this, we propose a decentralized framework that integrates predictive shielding with model-based finite horizon Q-learning. This approach allows agents to safely adapt their pre-trained policies during deployment. Furthermore, to mitigate livelocks in symmetric scenarios, we introduce a communication- free protocol for conflict resolution

Autonomous tugboating is central for automating maritime operations such as port logistics and vessel maneuvering, where multiple tugboats must cooperatively transport/manipulate a larger vessel. Collaborative pushing in this setting is challenging due to coupled hydrodynamics, low resistance, strong environmental disturbances, underactuated barge dynamics, and contact-rich interactions. Conventional control methods often rely on simplified models and fixed configurations, which limit their adaptability, while learning-based approaches are constrained by the lack of scalable and physically realistic training environments. We address these challenges by introducing a physics-based, GPU-accelerated simulation and learning framework for collaborative tugboat manipulation. Our simulator incorporates a customized buoyancy model, wave modeling, and hydrodynamic resistance, and supports large-scale multi-agent training under marine dynamics. In this simulator, we train a decentralized MAPPO (Multi-Agent PPO) policy augmented with a structured control prior (SCP) to improve training stability and maintain feasible pushing configurations. We evaluate our learned policy on straight-line transit, turning, and deceleration tasks, where we show that our decentralized framework yields more reliable and accurate maneuvering performance compared to a PID-based controller and a centralized PPO baseline. We further demonstrate zero-shot generalization to more challenging sea states and advanced maneuvers, as well as zero-shot scalability to larger teams of three and four tugboats despite training with only two agents.

Quantum game theory is an extension of classical game theory that uses quantum principles in game theory. The Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein (EWL) quantum game is an early example of the two-player classical Prisoner's Dilemma transformed into a quantum Prisoner's Dilemma. In the EWL game, the players choose pure quantum strategies represented by unitary matrices. This extension can resolve the classical dilemma by enabling cooperative equilibrium with higher payoff. In this paper, we first discuss the Extended EWL (EEWL) for multiplayer quantum games with mixed strategies. In EEWL, each player controls a set of unitary operators as quantum actions and uses a classical mixed strategy over these actions. The payoffs are defined as expectation values of Hermitian reward operators acting on a shared quantum state, which is generated and measured according to the EEWL protocol. We then propose the Unitary Strategy Matrix Exponential Algorithm (USMEA), a geometry-aware sequential algorithm for the EEWL mixed-strategy setting, in which each player jointly learns a trainable set of local unitary actions and the associated classical mixing probabilities. Thereby it acts as a learning-and-control layer for multi-agent quantum decision systems. We analyze the convergence properties of USMEA under standard smoothness and step-size conditions and validate the theory with numerical experiments. These results show how classical optimization methods can be systematically integrated into the design and analysis of engineered quantum strategic interactions.

Efficient, fully automatic, and physically plausible 4D Gaussian synthesis is an important goal for dynamic scene generation. Recent physics-based methods couple 3D Gaussians with the Material Point Method (MPM) to generate physically driven motion, but extending this paradigm to heterogeneous multi-part objects and interacting multi-object scenes remains challenging. Object-level physical assignment collapses distinct parts into a single material state, while one-shot predictions from large language models, vision-language models, or agents neither reliably bind different materials to identified parts nor verify that the resulting MPM configuration is executable. Score Distillation Sampling (SDS)-based parameter optimization, meanwhile, requires repeated per-scene score evaluations and gradient backpropagation, incurring lengthy optimization and potentially yielding suboptimal or unstable solutions. We therefore present PhysMAS, a physics-grounded multi-agent framework. From a motion prompt and four scene views, an Object-Part Scene Agent establishes persistent identities and calls a Material Reasoning Agent for part-wise profiles. It invokes solver-aware skills to bind these identities and profiles to per-particle MPM fields and execute all objects in a shared domain; the framework then screens candidate forward-simulation results. This supports heterogeneous multi-part and interacting multi-object scenes without per-scene diffusion-score backpropagation. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, compared with recent physics-based 4D Gaussian baselines that rely on SDS, PhysMAS achieves better semantic alignment and perceived physical plausibility while requiring less runtime.