LLM Hallucination Mitigation

Although LLMs drive automation, it is critical to ensure immense consideration for high-stakes enterprise workflows such as those involving legal matters, risk management, and privacy compliance. For Meta, and other organizations like ours, a single hallucinated clause in such high stakes workflows risks material consequences. We show that by framing hallucination mitigation as a Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) problem, we can dramatically reduce this risk. Specifically, we introduce a Hybrid Utility MBR (HUMBR) framework that synthesizes semantic embedding similarity with lexical precision to identify consensus without ground-truth references, for which we derive rigorous error bounds. We complement this theoretical analysis with a comprehensive empirical evaluation on widely-used public benchmark suites (TruthfulQA and LegalBench) and also real world data from Meta production deployment. The results from our empirical study show that MBR significantly outperforms standard Universal Self-Consistency. Notably, 81% of the pipeline's suggestions were preferred over human-crafted ground truth, and critical recall failures were virtually eliminated.

Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) are an important knowledge framework in toxicological research and risk assessment. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have gradually been applied to AOP-related question answering and mechanistic reasoning tasks. However, due to the existence of the hallucination problem, that is, the model may generate content that is inconsistent with facts or lacks evidence, their reliability is still limited. To address this issue, this study proposes an AOP-oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, AOP-Smart. Based on the official XML data from AOP-Wiki, this method uses Key Events (KEs), Key Event Relationships (KERs), and specific AOP information to retrieve relevant knowledge for user questions, thereby improving the reliability of the generated results of large language models. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, this study constructed a test set containing 20 AOP-related question answering tasks, covering KE identification, upstream and downstream KE retrieval, and complex AOP retrieval tasks. Experiments were conducted on three mainstream large language models, Gemini, DeepSeek, and ChatGPT, and comparative tests were performed under two settings: without RAG and with RAG. The experimental results show that, without using RAG, the accuracies of GPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini were 15.0%, 35.0%, and 20.0%, respectively; after using RAG, their accuracies increased to 95.0%, 100.0%, and 95.0%, respectively. The results indicate that AOP-Smart can significantly alleviate the hallucination problem of large language models in AOP knowledge tasks, and greatly improve the accuracy and consistency of their answers.

While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, their reliability is significantly compromised by hallucinations. Existing intrinsic self-correction methods attempt to address this, but often fail due to self-bias, where models struggle to identify errors in their own outputs without external verification. To overcome these limitations, we propose the LDPC-inspired semantic error correction for retrieval-augmented generation (SERC), providing a theoretical framework to interpret and mitigate LLM hallucinations. We reformulate the text generation process as a semantic noisy channel, treating generated responses as noise-corrupted codewords. Inspired by low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, SERC employs a sparse verification strategy: instead of exhaustively checking all facts, it generates low-density verification queries and validates them against external evidence to efficiently detect and correct errors. We evaluate SERC on LongForm Bio and TruthfulQA benchmarks using Llama-3-8B and Qwen2.5-14B. Experimental results demonstrate that SERC outperforms both intrinsic self-correction methods and strong retrieval-augmented baselines, demonstrating significant gains especially in factual precision (FactScore). Notably, SERC enables small language models (SLMs) to surpass the performance of larger baselines in hallucination reduction and information preservation. Our findings demonstrate that SERC provides a training-free, model-agnostic solution that significantly reduces verification overhead compared to dense methods, achieving an optimal trade-off between cost and fidelity in resource-constrained environments.

The psychological profile that structurally documents the case of a depression patient is essential for psychotherapy. Large language models can be applied to summarize the profiles from counseling speech, however, it may suffer from long-context forgetting and produce unverifiable hallucinations, due to overlong length of speech, multi-party interactions and unstructured chatting. Hereby, we propose a StreamProfile, a streaming framework that processes counseling speech incrementally, extracts evidences grounded from ASR transcriptions by storing it in a Hierarchical Evidence Memory, and then performs a Chain-of-Thought pipeline according to PM+ psychological intervention for clinical reasoning. The final profile is synthesized strictly from those evidences, making every claim traceable. Experiments on real-world teenager counseling speech have shown that the proposed StreamProfile system can accurately generate the profiles and prevent hallucination.

Large language models (LLMs) suffer from hallucination and context forgetting. Prior studies suggest that attention drift is a primary cause of these problems, where LLMs' focus shifts towards newly generated tokens and away from the initial input context. To counteract this, we make use of a related, intrinsic characteristic of LLMs: attention sink -- the tendency to consistently allocate high attention to the very first token (i.e., <BOS>) of a sequence. Concretely, we propose an advanced context anchoring method, SinkTrack, which treats <BOS> as an information anchor and injects key contextual features (such as those derived from the input image or instruction) into its representation. As such, LLM remains anchored to the initial input context throughout the entire generation process. SinkTrack is training-free, plug-and-play, and introduces negligible inference overhead. Experiments demonstrate that SinkTrack mitigates hallucination and context forgetting across both textual (e.g., +21.6% on SQuAD2.0 with Llama3.1-8B-Instruct) and multi-modal (e.g., +22.8% on M3CoT with Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct) tasks. Its consistent gains across different architectures and scales underscore the robustness and generalizability. We also analyze its underlying working mechanism from the perspective of information delivery. Our source code is available at https://github.com/67L1/SinkTrack.

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into aviation safety decision-making represents a significant technological advancement, yet their standalone application poses critical risks due to inherent limitations such as factual inaccuracies, hallucination, and lack of verifiability. These challenges undermine the reliability required for safety-critical environments where errors can have catastrophic consequences. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a novel, end-to-end framework that synergistically combines LLMs and Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to enhance the trustworthiness of safety analytics. The framework introduces a dual-phase pipeline: it first employs LLMs to automate the construction and dynamic updating of an Aviation Safety Knowledge Graph (ASKG) from multimodal sources. It then leverages this curated KG within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture to ground, validate, and explain LLM-generated responses. The implemented system demonstrates improved accuracy and traceability over LLM-only approaches, effectively supporting complex querying and mitigating hallucination. Results confirm the framework's capability to deliver context-aware, verifiable safety insights, addressing the stringent reliability requirements of the aviation industry. Future work will focus on enhancing relationship extraction and integrating hybrid retrieval mechanisms.

Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance across many tasks but remain prone to hallucination, especially in long-form generation where redundant retrieved contexts and lengthy reasoning chains amplify factual errors. Recent studies highlight a critical phenomenon: the closer key information appears to the model outputs, the higher the factual accuracy. However, existing retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) lack effective mechanisms to ensure this proximity - external evidence is injected into reasoning via multi-turn retrieval, but this cannot ensure key information stays close to the outputs. We propose Micro-Macro Retrieval (M2R), a novel retrieve-while-generate framework to fill this gap. At the macro level, M2R retrieves coarse-grained evidence from external sources; at the micro level, it extracts essential results from a key information repository built during reasoning and reuses them while generating answers. This design directly addresses the key-information-to-output proximity bottleneck, effectively reducing hallucination in long-form tasks. M2R is trained with a curriculum learning-based reinforcement learning strategy using customized rule-based rewards, enabling stable acquisition of retrieval and grounding skills. Extensive experiments across different benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of M2R, especially in lengthy-context settings.

Despite extensive research, Large Language Models continue to hallucinate when generating code, particularly when using libraries. On NL-to-code benchmarks that require library use, we find that LLMs generate code that uses non-existent library features in 8.1-40% of responses. One intuitive approach for detection and mitigation of hallucinations is static analysis. In this paper, we analyse the potential of static analysis tools, both in terms of what they can solve and what they cannot. We find that static analysis tools can detect 16-70% of all errors, and 14-85% of library hallucinations, with performance varying by LLM and dataset. Through manual analysis, we identify cases a static method could not plausibly catch, which gives an upper bound on their potential from 48.5% to 77%. Overall, we show that static analysis methods are cheap method for addressing some forms of hallucination, and we quantify how far short of solving the problem they will always be.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong knowledge reserves and task-solving capabilities, but still face the challenge of severe hallucination, hindering their practical application. Though scientific theories and rules can efficiently direct the behaviors of human manipulators, LLMs still do not utilize these highly-condensed knowledge sufficiently through training or prompting. To address this issue, we propose SciDC, an LLM generation method that integrate subject-specific knowledge with strong constraints. By adopting strong LLMs to automatically convert flexible knowledge into multi-layered, standardized rules, we build an extensible framework to effectively constrain the model generation on domain tasks. Experiments on scientific tasks including industrial formulation design, clinical tumor diagnosis and retrosynthesis planning, consistently demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, achieving a 12% accuracy improvement on average compared with vanilla generation. We further discuss the potential of LLMs in automatically inductively summarizing highly-condensed knowledge, looking ahead to practical solutions for accelerating the overall scientific research process. All the code of this paper can be obtained (https://github.com/Maotian-Ma/SciDC).

Hallucination in large language models (LLMs) continues to be a significant issue, particularly in tasks like question answering, where models often generate plausible yet incorrect or irrelevant information. Although various methods have been proposed to mitigate hallucinations, the relationship between attention patterns and hallucinations has not been fully explored. In this paper, we analyze the distribution of attention scores across each layer and attention head of LLMs, revealing a common and intriguing phenomenon: shallow layers of LLMs primarily rely on uniform attention patterns, where the model distributes its attention evenly across the entire sequence. This uniform attention pattern can lead to hallucinations, as the model fails to focus on the most relevant information. To mitigate this issue, we propose a training-free method called Attention Replacement Technique (ART), which replaces these uniform attention patterns in the shallow layers with local attention patterns. This change directs the model to focus more on the relevant contexts, thus reducing hallucinations. Through extensive experiments, ART demonstrates significant reductions in hallucinations across multiple LLM architectures, proving its effectiveness and generalizability without requiring fine-tuning or additional training data.

Integrating large language models (LLMs) into patient-facing healthcare systems offers significant potential to improve access to medical information. However, ensuring clinical safety and factual reliability remains a critical challenge. In practice, AI-generated responses may be conditionally correct yet medically inappropriate, as models often fail to interpret patient context and tend to produce agreeable responses rather than challenge unsafe assumptions. Unlike clinicians, who infer risk from incomplete information, LLMs frequently lack contextual awareness. Moreover, real-world patient interactions are open-ended and underspecified, unlike structured benchmark settings. We present CareGuardAI, a risk-aware safety framework for patient-facing medical question answering that addresses two key failure modes: clinical safety risk and hallucination risk. The framework introduces Clinical Safety Risk Assessment (SRA), inspired by ISO 14971, and Hallucination Risk Assessment (HRA) to evaluate medical risk and factual reliability. At inference time, CareGuardAI employs a multi-stage pipeline consisting of a controller agent, safety-constrained generation, and dual risk evaluation, followed by iterative refinement when necessary. Responses are released only when both SRA and HRA are less than or equal to 2, ensuring clinically acceptable outputs with bounded latency. We evaluate CareGuardAI on PatientSafeBench, MedSafetyBench, and MedHallu, covering both safety and hallucination detection. Across these benchmarks, the framework consistently outperforms strong baseline models, including GPT-4o-mini, demonstrating the importance of context-aware, risk-based, inference-time safety mechanisms for reliable deployment in healthcare.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across a wide range of natural language processing tasks; however, their effectiveness is highly dependent on prompt design, structure, and embedded reasoning signals. Conventional prompt engineering methods largely rely on heuristic trial-and-error processes, which limits scalability, reproducibility, and generalization across tasks. DSPy, a declarative framework for optimizing text-processing pipelines, offers an alternative approach by enabling automated, modular, and learnable prompt construction for LLM-based systems.This paper presents a systematic study of DSPy-based declarative learning for prompt optimization, with emphasis on prompt synthesis, correction, calibration, and adaptive reasoning control. We introduce a unified DSPy LLM architecture that combines symbolic planning, gradient free optimization, and automated module rewriting to reduce hallucinations, improve factual grounding, and avoid unnecessary prompt complexity. Experimental evaluations conducted on reasoning tasks, retrieval-augmented generation, and multi-step chain-of-thought benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in output reliability, efficiency, and generalization across models. The results show improvements of up to 30 to 45% in factual accuracy and a reduction of approximately 25% in hallucination rates. Finally, we outline key limitations and discuss future research directions for declarative prompt optimization frameworks.

Large language models (LLMs) hallucinate: they produce fluent outputs that are factually incorrect. We present a geometric dynamical systems framework in which hallucinations arise from task-dependent basin structure in latent space. Using autoregressive hidden-state trajectories across multiple open-source models and benchmarks, we find that separability is strongly task-dependent rather than universal: factoid settings can show clearer basin separation, whereas summarization and misconception-heavy settings are typically less stable and often overlap. We formalize this behavior with task-complexity and multi-basin theorems, characterize basin emergence in L-layer transformers, and show that geometry-aware steering can reduce hallucination probability without retraining.

This paper primarily focuses on the hallucinations caused due to AI language models(LLMs).LLMs have shown extraordinary Language understanding and generation capabilities .Still it has major a disadvantage hallucinations which give outputs which are factually incorrect ,misleading or unsupported by input data . These hallucinations cause serious problems in scenarios like medical diagnosis or legal reasoning.Through this work,we propose causal graph attention network (GCAN) framework that reduces hallucinations through interpretation of internal attention flow within a transformer architecture with the help of constructing token level graphs that combine self attention weights and gradient based influence scores.our method quantifies each tokens factual dependency using a new metric called the Causal Contribution Score (CCS). We further introduce a fact-anchored graph reweighting layer that dynamically reduces the influence of hallucination prone nodes during generation. Experiments on standard benchmarks such as TruthfulQA and HotpotQA show a 27.8 percent reduction in hallucination rate and 16.4 percent improvement in factual accuracy over baseline retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) models. This work contributes to the interpretability,robustness, and factual reliability of future LLM architectures.

Large language models (LLMs) often produce confident but incorrect answers, in part because standard evaluation incentives reward guessing over expressing uncertainty. We study epistemic abstention for factual questions with verifiable answers, where the goal is to improve selective answering, making LLMs abstain when they are likely to be wrong while preserving correct answers. Inspired by human behavioral decisions in question answering, we introduce I-CALM, a prompt-level framework for black-box LLMs. I-CALM combines elicited verbal confidence, announced answer/abstain payoffs, and normative guidance emphasizing truthfulness, humility, evidential support, and responsibility. To distinguish targeted abstention from indiscriminate refusal, we use a two-stage evaluation protocol, in which LLMs first choose whether to answer or abstain, and are then forced to provide a best guess for the abstained ones. Across models and factual QA datasets, I-CALM improves selective answering by reducing false-answer rate among surfaced responses and improving abstention quality, shifting error-prone cases into abstention while retaining answers the model would have answered correctly. Overall, I-CALM offers a lightweight way to improve inference-time selective answering without retraining or access to model's internal states. Code is available at https://github.com/FayLONG03/hallucinationControl.

Quantized Large Language Models (LLMs) are used more often in qualitative analysis because they run fast and need fewer computing resources. This study examines how different lower bits quantization levels (8-bit, 4-bit, 3-bit, and 2-bit) and quantization types affect the performance of LLaMA-3.1 (8B) on qualitative analysis. The study uses expert and non-expert responses from 82 interview transcripts. Low-bit models often produce higher levels of hallucinations and unstable results, especially when reading non-expert language with unclear terms. To improve performance, we propose a quantization-aware multi-pass prompt verification method. This method guides the model through controlled steps that reduce hallucinations. It removes unreliable content and passes the results to the next transcript after verification, improving accuracy. To validate performance, human coders analyzed transcripts using NVivo and BF16 LLaMA. BF16 LLaMA-3.1 produced high-precision output but had semantic drift and hallucination. These errors were corrected manually. The corrected BF16 output and NVivo human coding were combined to create a gold-standard ground truth (GSGT) for thematic extraction and frequency analysis. The results show that 8-bit models stay closest to the GSGT. The 4-bit models lose accuracy but become stable when the proposed method is applied. The 3-bit and 2-bit models drop in performance because of heavy compression, but they improve with the proposed prompt design and verification. The study also finds that models at the same bit level behave differently depending on quantization type. Overall, the method helps low-resource LLMs become more stable, accurate, and suitable for qualitative research at lower cost.

Large language models and deep research agents supply citation URLs to support their claims, yet the reliability of these citations has not been systematically measured. We address six research questions about citation URL validity using 10 models and agents on DRBench (53,090 URLs) and 3 models on ExpertQA (168,021 URLs across 32 academic fields). We find that 3--13% of citation URLs are hallucinated -- they have no record in the Wayback Machine and likely never existed -- while 5--18% are non-resolving overall. Deep research agents generate substantially more citations per query than search-augmented LLMs but hallucinate URLs at higher rates. Domain effects are pronounced: non-resolving rates range from 5.4% (Business) to 11.4% (Theology), with per-model effects even larger. Decomposing failures reveals that some models fabricate every non-resolving URL, while others show substantial link-rot fractions indicating genuine retrieval. As a solution, we release urlhealth, an open-source tool for URL liveness checking and stale-vs-hallucinated classification using the Wayback Machine. In agentic self-correction experiments, models equipped with urlhealth reduce non-resolving citation URLs by $6\textrm{--}79\times$ to under 1%, though effectiveness depends on the model's tool-use competence. The tool and all data are publicly available. Our characterization findings, failure taxonomy, and open-source tooling establish that citation URL validity is both measurable at scale and correctable in practice.

Enabling large language models (LLMs) to appropriately abstain from answering questions beyond their knowledge is crucial for mitigating hallucinations. While existing reinforcement learning methods foster autonomous abstention, they often compromise answer accuracy because their static reward mechanisms, agnostic to models' knowledge boundaries, drive models toward excessive caution. In this work, we propose KARL, a novel framework that continuously aligns an LLM's abstention behavior with its evolving knowledge boundary. KARL introduces two core innovations: a Knowledge-Boundary-Aware Reward that performs online knowledge boundary estimation using within-group response statistics, dynamically rewarding correct answers or guided abstention; and a Two-Stage RL Training Strategy that first explores the knowledge boundary and bypasses the "abstention trap", and subsequently converts incorrect answers beyond the knowledge boundary into abstentions without sacrificing accuracy. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that KARL achieves a superior accuracy-hallucination trade-off, effectively suppressing hallucinations while maintaining high accuracy across both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios.

Long-form research questions often require answers that combine complementary details, reconcile conflicting estimates, and retain qualifications across several large language model (LLM) outputs. We present an inspectable LLM Council with two synthesis stages: an analyst organizes three independent candidate answers into a structured textual state, and a separately invoked writer composes the final response from the question and that state. We evaluate the workflow on 100 closed-book tasks from the Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivity (DRACO) benchmark, retaining 600 final answers, 100 analyst states, and 720 whole-answer judgments. Under the primary rubric judge, Council scores 70.98, exceeding GPT and Gemini by 6.18 and 8.34 points; its 0.47-point difference from Claude has a 95% paired interval of $[-0.69,1.61]$. In the four-arm fusion comparison, Council scores 1.87 points above direct fusion (95% paired interval $[0.33,3.48]$) and covers 51.1% of positive criteria covered by exactly one candidate, compared with 43.7% for direct fusion. On an exploratory 68-task subset with matching returned model labels, direct fusion scores higher. The full comparison characterizes workflows that differ in structure and generation budget; estimating the analyst stage's effect requires a controlled component study. Traced cases show how selected estimates, provenance qualifications, and selection decisions pass through the saved state into final answers.

For Large Language Models (LLMs) to be reliably deployed, models must effectively know when not to answer: abstain. Reasoning models, in particular, have gained attention for impressive performance on complex tasks. However, reasoning models have been shown to have worse abstention abilities. Taking the vulnerabilities of reasoning models into account, we propose our Query Misalignment Framework. Hallucinations resulting in failed abstention can be reinterpreted as LLMs answering the wrong question (rather than answering a question incorrectly). Based on this framework, we develop a new class of state-of-the-art abstention methods called Trace Inversion. First, we generate the reasoning trace of a model. Based on only the trace, we then reconstruct the most likely query that the model responded to. Finally, we compare the initial query with the reconstructed query. Low similarity score between the initial query and reconstructed query suggests that the model likely answered the question incorrectly and is flagged to abstain. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Trace Inversion effectively boosts abstention performance in four frontier LLMs across nine abstention QA datasets, beating competitive baselines in 33 out of 36 settings.

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with token-level hard labels can amplify overconfident imitation of factually unsupported targets, causing hallucinations that propagate in multi-sentence generation. We study an augmented SFT setting in which training instances include coarse sentence-level factuality risk labels and inter-sentence dependency annotations, providing structured signals about where factual commitments are weakly supported. We propose PRISM, a differentiable risk-gated framework that modifies learning only at fact-critical positions. PRISM augments standard SFT with a lightweight, model-aware probability reallocation objective that penalizes high-confidence predictions on risky target tokens, with its scope controlled by span-level risk weights and model-aware gating. Experiments on hallucination-sensitive factual benchmarks and general evaluations show that PRISM improves factual aggregates across backbones while maintaining a competitive overall capability profile. Ablations further show that the auxiliary signal is most effective when used conservatively, and that knowledge masking and model-aware reallocation play complementary roles in balancing factual correction and capability preservation.

Reducing hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for accurate data extraction from large text corpora. Current methods, like prompt engineering and chain-of-thought prompting, focus on individual documents and fail to consider relationships across a corpus. This paper introduces Peer Context Outlier Detection (P-COD), which uses inter-document relationships to improve extraction accuracy in scientific literature summarization, where papers with similar experiment settings should draw similar conclusions. By comparing extracted data to validated peer information within the corpus, we adjust confidence scores and flag low-confidence results for expert review. Our experiments demonstrate up to 98% precision in outlier detection across 6 scientific domains, reducing hallucinations and letting researchers focus on genuinely ambiguous cases.

Large language models (LLMs) need reliable test-time control of hallucinations. Existing conformal methods for LLMs typically provide only marginal guarantees and rely on a single global threshold, which can under-cover hard prompts, over-cover easy ones, and produce oversized prediction sets. We propose Conditional Factuality Control (CFC), a post-hoc conformal framework that returns set-valued outputs with conditional coverage guarantees. CFC defines a continuous, feature-conditional acceptance threshold through augmented quantile regression on a latent ``success'' score, and deploys it through a fixed-point threshold rule at inference time. Theoretically, we show that CFC satisfies a conditional coverage guarantee under exchangeability and analyze its efficiency, proving that, under mild assumptions on the score distributions, the conditional rule is strictly more sample-efficient than marginal conformal prediction at the same target coverage. We further derive a PAC-style variant, CFC-PAC, which shrinks the nominal risk level based on a stability bound, yielding a finite-sample certificate that the conditional miscoverage deviates from the target by at most $O(\sqrt{\log(1/δ)/N})$. Empirically, on synthetic data, real-world reasoning and QA benchmarks, and a Flickr8k VLM setting, CFC and CFC-PAC consistently attain near-target coverage across difficulty groups while using smaller prediction sets than CP and non-CP baselines.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to reduce hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge. However, RAG introduces a critical challenge: hallucination on hallucination," where flawed retrieval results mislead the generation model, leading to compounded hallucinations. To address this issue, we propose VOTE-RAG, a novel, training-free framework with a two-stage structure and efficient, parallelizable voting mechanisms. VOTE-RAG includes: (1) Retrieval Voting, where multiple agents generate diverse queries in parallel and aggregate all retrieved documents; (2) Response Voting, where multiple agents independently generate answers based on the aggregated documents, with the final output determined by majority vote. We conduct comparative experiments on six benchmark datasets. Our results show that VOTE-RAG achieves performance comparable to or surpassing more complex frameworks. Additionally, VOTE-RAG features a simpler architecture, is fully parallelizable, and avoids the problem drift" risk. Our work demonstrates that simple, reliable ensemble voting is a superior and more efficient method for mitigating RAG hallucinations.

Language models detect false premises when asked directly but absorb them under conversational pressure, producing authoritative professional output built on errors they already identified. This failure - order-gap hallucination - is invisible to output inspection because the error migrates into the activation space of the safety circuit, suppressed but not erased. We introduce Squish and Release (S&R), an activation-patching architecture with two components: a fixed detector body (layers 24-31, the localized safety evaluation circuit) and a swappable detector core (an activation vector controlling perception direction). A safety core shifts the model from compliance toward detection; an absorb core reverses it. We evaluate on OLMo-2 7B using the Order-Gap Benchmark - 500 chains across 500 domains, all manually graded. Key findings: cascade collapse is near-total (99.8% compliance at O5); the detector body is binary and localized (layers 24-31 shift 93.6%, layers 0-23 contribute zero, p<10^-189); a synthetically engineered core releases 76.6% of collapsed chains; detection is the more stable attractor (83% restore vs 58% suppress); and epistemic specificity is confirmed (false-premise core releases 45.4%, true-premise core releases 0.0%). The contribution is the framework - body/core architecture, benchmark, and core engineering methodology - which is model-agnostic by design.

We present H-Node Adversarial Noise Cancellation (H-Node ANC), a mechanistic framework that identifies, exploits, and defends hallucination representations in transformer-based large language models (LLMs) at the level of individual hidden-state dimensions. A logistic regression probe trained on last-token hidden states localizes hallucination signal to a small set of high-variance dimensions -- termed Hallucination Nodes (H-Nodes) -- with probe AUC reaching 0.90 across four architectures. A white-box adversarial attack amplifies these dimensions at inference time via a real-time forward hook, achieving a selectivity of 3.02x with less than 10% visibility to the defender. Adaptive ANC defense suppresses H-Node excess in-pass using confidence-weighted cancellation, reducing grounded activation drift by 33-42% over static cancellation. A dynamic iterative extension that re-ranks cancellation targets across successive passes recovers up to 0.69 robustness from a single-pass baseline of 8%. All contributions are validated on OPT-125M, Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct, LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3 (125M-8B parameters). Perplexity impact is surgical (<5%) and MMLU degradation is at most 3%, confirming that the defense does not impair general reasoning capability.

Hallucination remains a critical bottleneck for large language models (LLMs), undermining their reliability in real-world applications, especially in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. While existing hallucination detection methods employ LLM-as-a-judge to verify LLM outputs against retrieved evidence, they suffer from inherent confirmation bias, where the verifier inadvertently reproduces the errors of the original generation. To address this, we introduce Multi-Agent Reinforced Self-Check for Hallucination (MARCH), a framework that enforces rigorous factual alignment by leveraging deliberate information asymmetry. MARCH orchestrates a collaborative pipeline of three specialized agents: a Solver, a Proposer, and a Checker. The Solver generates an initial RAG response, which the Proposer decomposes into claim-level verifiable atomic propositions. Crucially, the Checker validates these propositions against retrieved evidence in isolation, deprived of the Solver's original output. This well-crafted information asymmetry scheme breaks the cycle of self-confirmation bias. By training this pipeline with multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), we enable the agents to co-evolve and optimize factual adherence. Extensive experiments across hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that MARCH substantially reduces hallucination rates. Notably, an 8B-parameter LLM equipped with MARCH achieves performance competitive with powerful closed-source models. MARCH paves a scalable path for factual self-improvement of LLMs through co-evolution. The code is at https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/MARCH.

The adoption of generative AI across commercial and legal professions offers dramatic efficiency gains -- yet for law in particular, it introduces a perilous failure mode in which the AI fabricates fictitious case law, statutes, and judicial holdings that appear entirely authentic. Attorneys who unknowingly file such fabrications face professional sanctions, malpractice exposure, and reputational harm, while courts confront a novel threat to the integrity of the adversarial process. This failure mode is commonly dismissed as random hallucination', but recent physics-based analysis of the Transformer's core mechanism reveals a deterministic component: the AI's internal state can cross a calculable threshold, causing its output to flip from reliable legal reasoning to authoritative-sounding fabrication. Here we present this science in a legal-industry setting, walking through a simulated brief-drafting scenario. Our analysis suggests that fabrication risk is not an anomalous glitch but a foreseeable consequence of the technology's design, with direct implications for the evolving duty of technological competence. We propose that legal professionals, courts, and regulators replace the outdated black box' mental model with verification protocols based on how these systems actually fail.

Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed as autonomous agents commonly use Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), feeding retrieved documents into the context window, which creates two problems: the risk of hallucination grows with context length, and token cost scales linearly with dataset size. We propose the Reasoner-Executor-Synthesizer (RES) architecture, a three-layer design that strictly separates intent parsing (Reasoner), deterministic data retrieval and aggregation (Executor), and narrative generation (Synthesizer). The Executor uses zero LLM tokens and passes only fixed-size statistical summaries to the Synthesizer. We formally prove that RES achieves O(1) token complexity with respect to dataset size, and validate this on ScholarSearch, a scholarly research assistant backed by the Crossref API (130M+ articles). Across 100 benchmark runs, RES achieves a mean token cost of 1,574 tokens regardless of whether the dataset contains 42,000 or 16.3 million articles. The architecture eliminates data hallucination by construction: the LLM never sees raw records. KEYWORDS LLM agents; agentic architecture; hallucination elimination; token optimization; context window; retrieval-augmented generation; deterministic execution; scholarly metadata; Crossref API; O(1) complexity.

Selective prediction systems can mitigate harms resulting from language model hallucinations by abstaining from answering in high-risk cases. Uncertainty quantification techniques are often employed to identify such cases, but are rarely evaluated in the context of the wider selective prediction policy and its ability to operate at low target error rates. We identify a model-dependent failure mode of entropy-based uncertainty methods that leads to unreliable abstention behaviour, and address it by combining entropy scores with a correctness probe signal. We find that across three QA benchmarks (TriviaQA, BioASQ, MedicalQA) and four model families, the combined score generally improves both the risk--coverage trade-off and calibration performance relative to entropy-only baselines. Our results highlight the importance of deployment-facing evaluation of uncertainty methods, using metrics that directly reflect whether a system can be trusted to operate at a stated risk level.