MT Evaluation
MT: Machine Translation
Overview
Machine translation evaluation studies how well translations preserve meaning and meet linguistic, cultural, and practical needs, helping researchers compare systems and identify failures. Approaches range from reference-based metrics such as BLEU and chrF to neural metrics such as COMET, quality estimation without references, and human assessment using error taxonomies like MQM. Benchmarks increasingly test low-resource languages, specialized domains, document context, cultural nuance, speech, and images, while LLM judges and targeted error checks offer ways to assess qualities that simple text overlap misses. A central challenge is that automatic scores can disagree with human judgments and overlook valid variation, so reliable evaluation must balance scalable metrics with context-sensitive human review.
Latest papers
173 papers16 papers in the last four weeks, down 38% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.
Parameter-Efficient Quality Estimation via Frozen Recursive Models
Is Human Annotation Necessary? Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection in Machine Translation
Semi-Synthetic Parallel Data for Translation Quality Estimation: A Case Study of Dataset Building for an Under-Resourced Language Pair
Large Language Models as Annotators for Machine Translation Quality Estimation
IMTBench: A Multi-Scenario Cross-Modal Collaborative Evaluation Benchmark for In-Image Machine Translation
ASCAT: An Arabic Scientific Corpus and Benchmark for Advanced Translation Evaluation
quickmt-en-ar), and commercial MT APIs (Google Translate, DeepL) and subsequently validated by domain experts at the lexical, syntactic, and semantic levels. The resulting corpus contains 67,293 English tokens and 60,026 Arabic tokens, with an Arabic vocabulary of 17,604 unique words reflecting the morphological richness of the language. We benchmark three state-of-the-art LLMs on the corpus GPT-4o-mini (BLEU: 37.07), Gemini-3.0-Flash-Preview (BLEU: 30.44), and Qwen3-235B-A22B (BLEU: 23.68) demonstrating its discriminative power as an evaluation benchmark. ASCAT addresses a critical gap in scientific MT resources for Arabic and is designed to support rigorous evaluation of scientific translation quality and training of domain-specific translation models.