Multicalibration

Omniprediction is a learning guarantee which requires a single predictor to be competitive relative to the best hypothesis from a benchmark class for any loss chosen from a family of loss functions. Loss Outcome Indistinguishability (loss OI for short) is a stronger notion that implies omniprediction. It requires the predicted distribution on labels to be indistinguishable from the true distribution to tests that depend on the loss functions and the benchmark class. Multiaccuracy and multicalibration are multigroup fairness notions that generalize classical notions of calibration and accuracy in expectation. Most known learning algorithms for omniprediction (both for the standard notion and for strengthenings like loss OI) rely on some version of these multigroup fairness notions, or on an intermediate notion called calibrated multiaccuracy. We ask if this is necessary: Does omniprediction require some form of multigroup fairness? We show that the answer is no for (plain) omniprediction, and yes for loss OI. First, a sequence of works shows that multicalibration or calibrated multiaccuracy imply omniprediction. We rule out even a weak converse, by showing that omniprediction for proper losses does not imply even accuracy in expectation, a much weaker notion than any of calibration, multiaccuracy, or multicalibration. Second, prior work showed how to achieve loss OI from a combination of calibration and multiaccuracy. We show a converse: loss OI is equivalent to a form of calibrated multiaccuracy.

Multicalibration requires a predictor's residuals to be unbiased not only globally, but also after conditioning on the predictor's own level sets and reweighting by a rich class of test functions. Standard boosting approaches in the distributional setting achieve this by repeatedly discretizing the predictor's range then auditing and repairing the resulting level sets. One consequence is that in practice, the algorithm's guarantees are sensitive to this parametrization of the rounding parameter. A natural theoretical question, then, is how to do discretization-free boosting which avoids this rounding within the boosting process itself. Here, we analyze an alternative feature-augmentation boosting paradigm inspired by Tax et al. (2026): at each round, a squared-loss oracle is called on hypotheses that receive the previous predictor's output as an additional feature, and only the final predictor is rounded to have a finite set of level sets to provide the multicalibration guarantee with respect to. We give a theoretical analysis of this procedure through the expressivity of the augmented hypothesis class, and show how the expressivity of this class yields a hierarchy of guarantees, including multiaccuracy, multicalibration, and the stronger notion of level-set multicalibration.

Calibration requires a predictor to be unbiased after conditioning on its own predictions. Multicalibration asks for this guarantee simultaneously across a collection of groups. Many prediction tasks ask for several related features of the same conditional outcome distribution: variance is defined relative to the mean, skewness relative to both mean and variance, and conditional value at risk relative to a quantile. We study multicalibration for a sequence of $k$ properties in which each property is identifiable once the preceding properties are fixed. This framework includes Bayes pairs but does not require the properties to arise from a single loss. For every fixed $k\ge2$, we establish matching upper and lower sample-complexity bounds up to logarithmic factors under regularity conditions. Even with only polylogarithmically many binary groups, achieving multicalibration error $\varepsilon$ requires $\widetildeΩ(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)})$ samples. Conversely, for any finite group family $\mathcal G$, we give a randomized learner using $O(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)}+\varepsilon^{-2}\log|\mathcal G|)$ samples. Thus the sample complexity is $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-(k+2)})$ for polynomial-size group families. We instantiate the theory for three canonical examples.

Swap-agnostic learning strengthens classical agnostic learning by allowing the comparator to select a different hypothesis on each level set of the learner's predictions. This benchmark captures prediction-dependent postprocessing, but appears to require solving a separate agnostic-learning problem for every possible prediction value. We show that, for proper losses, these prediction-level comparisons can instead be controlled jointly. Our main result is an offline swap-agnostic learner for any fixed proper loss. For a finite hypothesis class $H$ and any fixed smooth proper loss, the excess risk from $m$ i.i.d. samples is $\widetilde{O}((\log |H|/m)^{2/3})$, with a corresponding online swap-regret bound of $\widetilde{O}(T^{1/3}(\log |H|)^{2/3})$. We also give algorithms whose predictions are simultaneously swap-agnostic for entire families of losses. For all proper losses bounded in $[-1,1]$, we obtain online and offline rates of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{T\log |H|})$ and $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{\log |H|/m})$, respectively. For convex, $1$-Lipschitz proper losses, these rates improve to $\widetilde{O}(T^{1/3}(\log |H|)^{2/3})$ online and $\widetilde{O}((\log |H|/m)^{2/3})$ offline. These bounds are tight up to logarithmic factors and improve upon the $\widetilde{O}(T^{2/3}(\log |H|)^{1/3})$ rate implied by the swap-omniprediction guarantee of Luo et al. (2025). Our main technical contribution is a reduction from swap-agnostic learning to a second-order form of multicalibration, obtained via Blackwell approachability with a Bernstein-style variance correction.

A model is multicalibrated on a collection of group weights $G$ if it is calibrated -- i.e. unbiased even conditional on its prediction -- not just overall, but also after reweighting contexts by each $g \in G$. It is a useful property for many downstream applications and is a basic desideratum of trustworthy machine learning. Before this work, all predictors known to attain the minimax-optimal $\widetilde O(\varepsilon^{-3})$ sample complexity rate for $\varepsilon$-multicalibration were randomized, while deterministic predictors were known only with substantially worse sample complexity. Whether randomization is necessary for optimal sample complexity in multicalibration was explicitly asked by [CLNR26] and implicitly in several prior works. We resolve this open problem by giving a minimax-optimal multicalibration algorithm that outputs a deterministic predictor. We then generalize the algorithm to produce optimal deterministic predictors that satisfy outcome indistinguishability (OI) with respect to finite or finitely covered collections of tests. As an application, this also gives deterministic omnipredictors and panpredictors with optimal sample complexity, resolving open problems posed by [OKK25] and [BHHLZ25].

Online link recommendation on evolving graphs is performative: by choosing which candidate links to show users, the system changes which links form and what feedback it later observes. Consequently, fairness estimates from logged outcomes can be misleading and may drift after deployment when the recommendation policy is updated. We introduce COPF (Counterfactual Online Performative Fairness), a decision-layer framework for deployment-stable fairness monitoring and control in online link recommendation. COPF (i) defines group-level opportunity gaps over exposure (shown vs. not shown) counterfactuals, (ii) makes them estimable by explicit exploration and by logging the probability (propensity) that each candidate is shown, and (iii) audits and controls fairness using residual outcome indistinguishability (OI) over a configurable auditor family with graph-aware doubly robust (GA-DR) estimators. We provide a noisy transfer theorem showing that Residual-OI on estimated GA-DR residuals implies bounds on exposure-counterfactual group gaps under temporal mixing and bounded local interference, and we instantiate an online multicalibration auditor together with a primal-dual controller. Experiments on two TGB streams and a controlled synthetic bipartite stream show that COPF reduces worst-case spikes in exposure-counterfactual group disparities with modest impact on ranking utility. Our code is available at https://github.com/lsnnnnnnnn/COPF.

Multicalibration extends classical calibration by requiring predictions to be unbiased over a rich collection of functions, encompassing both prediction slices and subpopulations. It has emerged as a powerful framework for fairness, robustness, and reliable prediction, yet the theoretical understanding of multicalibration boosting (MCBoost) remains fragmented and often relies on restrictive assumptions. In this work, we develop a unified and refined perspective on MCBoost that subsumes existing variants, including multiaccuracy, BatchGCP, and BatchMVP. We uncover several phenomena that provide new insights into its practical behavior: even highly accurate and flexible predictors can remain substantially miscalibrated; enforcing multicalibration introduces a calibration-risk trade-off; and early stopping plays a central role in controlling this trade-off. On the theoretical side, we establish a general framework for MCBoost under weaker and more realistic conditions. We show that the boosting iterates converge to a Bregman projection of the population-optimal predictor onto the cumulative span generated by the audit class, thereby explicitly characterizing the function space on which multicalibration is achieved. We further derive convergence rates under different smoothness assumptions, finite-sample guarantees, and principled stopping rules that ensure multicalibration at termination. Finally, we extend the theory of universal adaptability under covariate shift, providing more general transfer guarantees and clarifying when multicalibrated predictors generalize across domains. These results provide a more complete theoretical foundation and practical guidance for multicalibration boosting, positioning it as both a unifying framework and a reliable post-processing approach for modern predictive models.

Multicalibration requires predicted scores to agree with label probabilities across rich families of subgroups and score-dependent tests, but existing methods require clean input-label pairs for evaluation and post-processing. This assumption fails in weakly supervised learning (WSL) regimes -- including positive-unlabeled, unlabeled-unlabeled, and positive-confidence learning -- where clean labels are costly or unavailable even though reliable uncertainty estimates may be crucial. We address this gap by developing estimators of multicalibration error and post-hoc correction methods for WSL settings in which clean input-label pairs are unavailable. We propose a unified framework for estimating and correcting multicalibration under weak supervision by combining contamination-matrix risk rewrites with witness-based calibration constraints, yielding corrected multicalibration moments with finite-sample guarantees. We further propose weak-label multicalibration boost (WLMC), a generic post-hoc recalibration algorithm under weak supervision. Finally, we conduct experiments across multiple weak-supervision settings to evaluate multicalibration behavior and offer empirical insight into uncertainty estimation under weak supervision.

We study online multicalibration beyond the worst-case. We give a single, efficient algorithm which dynamically interpolates between benign and worst-case sequences by adaptively refining a dyadic grid of prediction values. Its error is controlled by the number of leaves in the refinement tree. Our analysis recovers the known $\widetilde O(T^{2/3})$ worst-case-optimal rate for online multicalibration, while simultaneously automatically adapting to easier instances: in the marginal stochastic setting it obtains a rate of $\widetilde O(\sqrt T)$, and for piecewise-stationary means with $J$ segments its rate is $\widetilde O(\sqrt{JT})$. More generally, the rate depends on a threshold-complexity measure of the predictable mean process relative to the group family. We show that this dependence is tight up to logarithmic factors.

We study the minimax sample complexity of multicalibration in the batch setting. A learner observes $n$ i.i.d. samples from an unknown distribution and must output a (possibly randomized) predictor whose population multicalibration error, measured by Expected Calibration Error (ECE), is at most $\varepsilon$ with respect to a given family of groups. For every fixed $κ> 0$, in the regime $|G|\le \varepsilon^{-κ}$, we prove that $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-3})$ samples are necessary and sufficient, up to polylogarithmic factors. The lower bound holds even for randomized predictors, and the upper bound is realized by a randomized predictor obtained via an online-to-batch reduction. This separates the sample complexity of multicalibration from that of marginal calibration, which scales as $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-2})$, and shows that mean-ECE multicalibration is as difficult in the batch setting as it is in the online setting, in contrast to marginal calibration which is strictly more difficult in the online setting. In contrast we observe that for $κ= 0$, the sample complexity of multicalibration remains $\widetildeΘ(\varepsilon^{-2})$ exhibiting a sharp threshold phenomenon. More generally, we establish matching upper and lower bounds, up to polylogarithmic factors, for a weighted $L_p$ multicalibration metric for all $1 \le p \le 2$, with optimal exponent $3/p$. We also extend the lower-bound template to a regular class of elicitable properties, and combine it with the online upper bounds of Hu et al. (2025) to obtain matching bounds for calibrating properties including expectiles and bounded-density quantiles.

Estimating the prevalence of a category in a population using imperfect measurement devices (diagnostic tests, classifiers, or large language models) is fundamental to science, public health, and online trust and safety. Standard approaches correct for known device error rates but assume these rates remain stable across populations. We show this assumption fails under covariate shift and that multicalibration, which enforces calibration conditional on the input features rather than just on average, is sufficient for unbiased prevalence estimation under such shift. Standard calibration and quantification methods fail to provide this guarantee. Our work connects recent theoretical work on fairness to a longstanding measurement problem spanning nearly all academic disciplines. A simulation confirms that standard methods exhibit bias growing with shift magnitude, while a multicalibrated estimator maintains near-zero bias. While we focus the discussion mostly on LLMs, our theoretical results apply to any classification model. Two empirical applications -- estimating employment prevalence across U.S. states using the American Community Survey, and classifying political texts across four countries using an LLM -- demonstrate that multicalibration substantially reduces bias in practice, while highlighting that calibration data should cover the key feature dimensions along which target populations may differ.

We give a Gordon-Greenwald-Marks (GGM) style black-box reduction from online learning to online multicalibration. Concretely, we show that to achieve high-dimensional multicalibration with respect to a class of functions H, it suffices to combine any no-regret learner over H with an expected variational inequality (EVI) solver. We also prove a converse statement showing that efficient multicalibration implies efficient EVI solving, highlighting how EVIs in multicalibration mirror the role of fixed points in the GGM result for $Φ$-regret. This first set of results resolves the main open question in Garg, Jung, Reingold, and Roth (SODA '24), showing that oracle-efficient online multicalibration with $\sqrt{T}$-type guarantees is possible in full generality. Furthermore, our GGM-style reduction unifies the analyses of existing online multicalibration algorithms, enables new algorithms for challenging environments with delayed observations or censored outcomes, and yields the first efficient black-box reduction between online learning and multiclass omniprediction. Our second main result is a fine-grained reduction from high-dimensional online multicalibration to (contextual) $Φ$-regret minimization. Together with our first result, this establishes a new route from external regret to Phi-regret that bypasses sophisticated fixed-point or semi-separation machinery, dramatically simplifies a result of Daskalakis, Farina, Fishelson, Pipis, and Schneider (STOC '25) while improving rates, and yields new algorithms that are robust to richer deviation classes, such as those belonging to any reproducing kernel Hilbert space.