Counterfactual Fairness
Overview
Counterfactual fairness studies whether a model treats someone fairly by comparing its prediction with what it would predict for that same person under a change to a sensitive attribute. Causal approaches use structural causal models and path-specific effects to distinguish unfair pathways from justified ones, while model-agnostic methods compare counterfactual input pairs, regularize representations, or adjust predictions after training. The idea is being applied to classification, recommendations, reinforcement learning, graphs, and language-model decisions, where fairness must be balanced against accuracy and utility. A central challenge is that counterfactual fairness does not always guarantee group fairness, and conclusions can depend on uncertain causal assumptions, limited counterfactual data, and noise in model outputs.
Latest papers
22 papers3 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.