Quantum Error Mitigation

Quantum Reinforcement Learning (QRL) integrates reinforcement learning with parameterized quantum circuits and is a promising approach to combinatorial optimization. On Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, however, decoherence, gate imperfections, and measurement errors reduce policy quality and make learning less reliable. Existing error mitigation techniques are generally applied as fixed corrections that do not adapt to changing noise conditions or to the evolving state of training. This work presents Adaptive Policy-Guided Error Mitigation (APGEM) as a context-aware orchestration layer of the hybrid quantum-classical training loop that dynamically selects the most suitable mitigation strategy during QRL training. APGEM evaluates Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), and Readout Error Mitigation (REM) using policy-level indicators, including quantum-state fidelity, policy entropy, cumulative reward, and approximation ratio, and integrates the selected strategy directly into the reinforcement learning loop. The framework is evaluated on the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), a representative NP-hard problem in urban logistics, under a range of NISQ noise models and noise levels. APGEM consistently outperforms conventional static mitigation methods, reaches approximately 94% of the utility of an oracle strategy, maintains higher quantum-state fidelity as noise increases, and produces more stable learning behaviour throughout training. Ablation studies show that the framework learns context-aware mitigation policies that adapt to different noise environments and circuit execution conditions. These findings demonstrate that integrating adaptive error mitigation into the learning process substantially improves the robustness and reliability of QRL on NISQ hardware.

Supervised approaches to quantum error mitigation learn a map from noisy circuit outputs to ideal ones, and therefore require the ideal outputs. Producing those ideal outputs demands noiseless classical simulation, whose cost grows exponentially with system size, so supervision is unavailable in exactly the regime where mitigation matters most. We ask whether cheap, individually unreliable signals drawn from circuit structure and hardware calibration can take the place of ideal labels. We assemble sixteen heuristic labeling functions (stabilizer and parity constraints, relaxation and readout characteristics, local depth, gate counts, and neighboring activity), reconcile their disagreements with a probabilistic label model, and read the resulting per-qubit error probabilities as a readout channel whose inverse mitigates the measured distribution. No ideal output enters the training path. On $147{,}000$ five-qubit circuits executed on two IBM devices, the method removes $24.3\%$ (Algiers) and $28.8\%$ (Hanoi) of the Kullback-Leibler divergence to the ideal distribution, against $15.4\%$ and $21.5\%$ for the strongest published analytical baseline, a margin that holds on both devices and lies far outside its bootstrap interval. Supervised neural models trained on ideal distributions remain stronger where such labels exist, and we quantify that gap rather than setting it aside; the method's claim is to the regime where they do not, since the labels they require cannot be computed for the circuits mitigation is needed for. The codes will be released shortly.

Quantum Reinforcement Learning (QRL) represents policies as variational quantum circuits (VQCs), making it attractive for combinatorial optimization such as the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP). On noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware, however, decoherence degrades fidelity and destabilizes learning, and conventional error mitigation is applied statically without regard to the learning context. We introduce Adaptive Policy-Guided Error Mitigation (APGEM), a controller that selects among Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC), Clifford Data Regression (CDR), and Readout Error Mitigation (REM) online, driven by a fidelity, entropy, and cost aware utility function and an epsilon-greedy rule over temporal-difference Q-scores. We evaluate on a realistic urban-logistics testbed, a Delhi-based CVRP over real landmarks with geodesic inter-node costs, exercised across five noise families and four severity levels. On this instance, the QRL agent outperforms constructive heuristics and approaches metaheuristics, while mitigation restores approximation ratios from 0.84-0.87 to 0.92-0.94 under high noise. The controller shifts from a CDR-dominated regime under short training horizons to a balanced deployment across all four techniques under longer horizons, indicating genuine regime-dependent selection. These preliminary results position adaptive, learning-aware mitigation as a practical route to noise-resilient QRL.

How much does the noisy measurement add to learned quantum error mitigation? An accuracy table cannot say, because a model handed circuit structure can score well without reading the measurement at all. QEMScore adds the comparison that can. Each simulated circuit carries an exact ideal answer. The learned mitigator is scored beside a capacity-matched control, a model just as flexible that reads the same circuit description but never the measurement. Each method's measurement spend is accounted and not equalized. We run a controlled campaign on simulated circuits and reanalyze two published learned mitigators, Q-LEAR and QRAFT, from their released hardware data. Three findings stand out. First, under familiar within-family conditions (S0) evaluated across two spin-chain families and three seeds, continuous couplings identify the target, and the control that never reads the measurement matches 87.7 to 100.5 percent of the mitigator's gain over an affine fit to the circuit description. A plain polynomial in the coupling parameters, fitted after the campaign, beats the mitigator on all six evaluations, reflecting the selected learners' capacity. Second, for these selected learners, matching most of the gain is not matching the accuracy: on five of six evaluations the mitigator removes 19.5 to 74.5 percent of the error the capacity-matched control leaves, a learner-specific gap rather than a measurement requirement. Third, on released hardware data where descriptors only partially identify queries, the findings differ: flexible models of the descriptors show negligible mean gain over affine fits in Q-LEAR, and measurement inputs carry predictive gains in both Q-LEAR and QRAFT. These comparisons reflect representation- and protocol-specific behavior rather than an isolated cross-regime difference. A learned mitigator's accuracy should therefore be reported beside such controls.

Quantum-kernel methods encode a dataset's geometry in a Gram matrix, so learning claims on hardware kernels assume the intended geometry survives execution. We measure that survival for one frozen four-qubit ZZ feature-map kernel on $N=24$ real indoor air-quality windows, reconstructed on ibm_fez (1024 shots per circuit) under baseline, dynamical decoupling alone, and gate twirling alone, each a single non-interleaved job. Every configuration returned a complete, finite, positive-semidefinite Gram matrix and preserved the centered statevector geometry to a substantial but incomplete descriptive degree (full-matrix centered kernel alignment, CKA, 0.933-0.989). Gate twirling was most faithful on every reported geometry axis, with the only jackknife-resolved improvement over baseline (persisted Spearman, mean absolute error, and full-matrix CKA diagnostics); dynamical decoupling alone was not separated from baseline at the frozen-window scale. Residual hardware distortion, not finite sampling, dominates the discrepancy. Yet fidelity and label alignment were reversed: the most faithful configuration had the lowest centered kernel-target alignment, which sits at or below label-permutation references for statevector and hardware alike. We read the small hardware uplift as a normalization property of the non-affine distortion, not captured signal. These are descriptive results for single jobs on one backend, not causal mitigation-efficacy estimates; no quantum-advantage, hardware-classifier-superiority, or forecasting claim is made. Implementation fidelity and task relevance are distinct axes; hardware quantum machine-learning studies should report both.

Histopathologic cancer detection is challenging due to tissue variability, staining differences, and subtle visual distinctions between disease classes. We propose two quantum algorithms for this task: a configurable dual-gradient CSWAP circuit (DG-CSWAP) that computes multi-directional edge responses in a single execution via per-pixel local Ry encoding, and a hardware-efficient destructive swap circuit (DG-DST) natively matched to quantum processing unit (QPU) gate sets at substantially lower circuit complexity. We prove algebraic equivalence between DG-CSWAP and DG-DST, enabling a two-circuit QPU validation strategy. A three-stage NISQ mitigation pipeline, including readout error correction, bias subtraction, and slope regression, reduces single-pixel hardware MSE by ~8x. Validated on five quantum processors via Amazon Braket, the method achieves inter-platform Pearson r ~ 0.93-0.94 across all local-simulator pairs. Compared to a prior Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) based amplitude-encoding baseline requiring 12-qubit global state preparation and a three-model ensemble (85.55% on PatchCamelyon), the proposed method uses shot-based measurements, executes on real quantum hardware, and achieves 79.80% accuracy with a single ResNet-50. A Lite configuration delivers a 17x preprocessing speedup at a 2.59% accuracy cost. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first quantum hardware implementation study with noise mitigation for histopathologic image classification.

Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) offers a promising framework to train quantum models across distributed clients while keeping data strictly local. Due to its simplicity and low communication overhead, Federated Averaging (FedAvg) is the standard aggregation choice in QFL literature. However, deploying QFL on practical hardware exposes a severe double-drift phenomenon: the global model is simultaneously derailed by client drift from non-IID data and hardware bias from noisy quantum gradient estimates. In this work, we first analyze the convergence of FedAvg under these realistic conditions, mathematically demonstrating that quantum hardware bias creates a persistent error floor that standard averaging cannot correct. To overcome this limitation, we propose Q-ANCHOR, a quantum-aware federated aggregation architecture that anchors server updates with zero-noise extrapolation while applying stateful client correction to suppress both client drift and hardware-induced bias. Our convergence theory proves that Q-ANCHOR successfully mitigates classical client drift while actively reducing the hardware-bias floor. Experimental results demonstrate that Q-ANCHOR achieves significantly more stable training than conventional FL baselines.

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is essential for extracting reliable results from near-term quantum devices, yet practical deployments must balance mitigation strength against runtime overhead under time-varying noise. We introduce \emph{GSC-QEMit}, a telemetry-driven, \textbf{context--forecast--bandit} framework for \emph{adaptive} mitigation that switches between lightweight suppression and heavier intervention as drift evolves. GSC-QEMit composes three coupled modules: (G) a Growing Hierarchical Self-Organizing Map (GHSOM) that clusters streaming telemetry into operating contexts; (S) an uncertainty-aware subsampled Gaussian-process forecaster that predicts short-horizon fidelity degradation; and (C) a cost-aware contextual multi-armed bandit (CMAB) that selects mitigation actions via Thompson sampling with explicit intervention cost. We evaluate GSC-QEMit on benchmark circuit families (GHZ, Quantum Fourier Transform, and Grover search) under nonstationary noise regimes simulated in Qiskit Aer, using an instrumented testbed where action labels correspond to graded mitigation intensity. Across Clifford, non-Clifford, and structured workloads, GSC-QEMit improves average logical fidelity by \textbf{+9.0%} relative to unmitigated execution while reducing unnecessary heavy interventions by reserving them for inferred noise spikes. The resulting policies exhibit a favorable fidelity--cost trade-off and transfer across the evaluated workloads without circuit-specific tuning.

In the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime, quantum devices contain hardware-specific noise sources which restrict device-invariant error mitigation strategies. We explore transfer learning approaches to apply noise models learned on one quantum device to a different device with the help of a small amount of data. We create a real-hardware dataset from two IBM quantum devices, ibm_fez (source) and ibm_marrakesh (target), comprising 170 noisy and ideal circuit output distributions, with device calibration features added. We train a residual neural network on the source device to map noisy to ideal outcomes. The zero-shot transfer test shows a KL divergence of 1.6706 (up from 0.3014), establishing device specificity. With K = 20 fine-tuning samples, KL drops to 1.1924 (28.6% improvement over zero-shot), recovering 34.9% of the gap between zero-shot and in-domain KL. Ablation studies reveal that the major cause of mismatches across devices is CX gate error, followed by readout error. The results show quantum noise can be learned and fine-tuned with minimal samples, and provide a plausible approach to cross-device quantum error mitigation.

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) provides a practical route for estimating reliable observables on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Traditional QEM strategies, including zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) and Clifford data regression (CDR), rely on noise scaling or global regression, and their performance is constrained by the exponential growth of the system degrees of freedom. We construct a graph-enhanced mitigation (GEM) framework, which incorporates physical information into the model representation. In this work, quantum circuits are encoded as attributed graphs. Hardware-level physical information is mapped to node and edge features: local noise parameters such as calibration parameters $T_1$, $T_2$, and readout errors are encoded at nodes, while coupling-related information such as two-qubit gate errors is encoded as edge features. Graph neural networks are used to model how errors propagate along the physical coupling structure and build up into non-local correlations. This allows the model to capture local interactions and part of the resulting non-local correlations across qubits. A dual-branch affine correction is applied to maintain consistency with physical constraints. Experiments on 10-qubit and 16-qubit random circuits executed on superconducting quantum processors show that GEM provides a level of accuracy comparable to CDR at small scales, while yielding lower mean absolute error and improved stability in zero-shot transfer to larger systems. Results of the traditional QEM strategy indicate that global regression methods remain effective in low-dimensional settings but become less reliable as system degrees of freedom grow. In contrast, GEM makes use of local physical structures to show better scalability and generalization, while preserving the overall error propagation patterns. This work provides a practical scalable approach to QEM for NISQ devices.