Submodular Maximization

Heterogeneous federated learning requires clients with diverse computational capacities to collaboratively train a global model, where each client trains a capacity-constrained submodel. Existing methods select submodel parameters using heuristic importance measures---most prominently parameter magnitude---without theoretical justification for why these measures support convergence. We identify a fundamental gap: existing parameter selection criteria lack theoretical grounding in the convergence framework, partial client participation introduces additional estimation effects in the Fisher scores. We propose \textbf{FedFIbOS}: Fisher Importance-based Optimal Submodelling for heterogeneous federated learning, using Fisher Information in a principled criterion derived from minimizing submodel masking error. %We formally establish when magnitude selection is equivalent to Fisher selection fail under non-IID heterogeneous federated learning. We theoretically formulate submodel selection through a Fisher-weighted quadratic masking surrogate and show that the raw Fisher top-$k$ rule implemented by FedFIbOS solves this surrogate under a Fisher-dominant ranking condition. The resulting method retains the convergence structure of the underlying masked federated optimization bound. Fisher scores are efficiently estimated from empirical diagonal Fisher information using squared gradients, enabling stable and adaptive parameter selection without additional optimization overhead. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and AGNews under pathological and Dirichlet non-IID settings show FedFIbOS achieves ${\approx}10\%$ higher accuracy than the state of the art, with improvements becoming more pronounced under stronger heterogeneity.

Finding policies for Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) is a central problem in areas such as Reinforcement Learning and Operations Research. Here, we have to repeatedly choose an action that should be performed by an agent. Depending on the action and the current state of the agent, the agent collects a reward and randomly transitions into a new state. The goal is to maximize the reward in expectation over a finite time horizon of length $H$. We consider a recently introduced variant that generalizes the traditionally additive reward function in the model to a monotone submodular one, which allows for capturing a range of interesting applications. Without the stochastic component, this problem is equivalent to the Submodular Orienteering problem, where the goal is to find an $s$-$t$ walk in a directed graph maximizing a monotone submodular function under a length constraint. We present a novel LP-based algorithm for Submodular Orienteering using ideas from the Sherali-Adams hierarchy and Round-or-Cut. Our guarantees are comparable to the known quasi-polynomial time logarithmic approximation for Submodular Orienteering, but also extend to the setting of Submodular Markov Decision Processes. In the polynomial time regime, we present an $O(n^{\varepsilon})$-approximation (and $O(H^{\varepsilon})$ for Submodular MDPs) for every $\varepsilon >0$, where $n$ is the number of vertices, which was unknown even for Submodular Orienteering. Prior to our work, the best known approximation guarantee for Submodular MDPs had an approximation ratio linear in $H$. Beyond these algorithmic results, our methods reveal a trade-off between the approximation guarantee and the number of previously visited vertices on which an agent conditions its decision.

This work considers multi-agent coordination with arbitrary information networks among the agents using a game-theoretic approach. A system designer aims to assign local utility functions to the agents to guide their actions toward a desired system objective. The performance of the assigned local utilities is measured by the well known pure price of anarchy (pPoA) metric that equals the ratio of the system objective at the worst pure Nash equilibrium of the corresponding game to the optimal system objective. Our aim is to derive the utility functions which optimize the pPoA-based performance guarantees for any given information network and system objective. We develop a linear program that derives the optimal pPoA for any arbitrary information network and arbitrary system objective. Our work is the first to solve optimal utility design for arbitrary networks; our techniques generalize previous approaches which considered only the full-information setting. For supermodular objective functions, we prove that counterintuitively, a fully communication-denied utility design is optimal irrespective of the original information network. For submodular system objectives, an exhaustive numerical analysis suggests that the optimal utility design is robust to communication failures even for this case. When the system objective is weighted maximum coverage, the marginal contribution utility design provably optimizes the pPoA for a wide variety of information networks of interest.

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

Consistent submodular maximization studies the tradeoff between solution quality and stability when elements arrive over time. For a monotone submodular objective, which models diminishing returns, an algorithm maintains a set of at most $k$ available elements and changes only $O(1)$ elements after each insertion. Dütting et al. [2025] established a tight $2/3$ approximation with unrestricted computation and a polynomial-time $0.51$ approximation. They left open at STOC 2025 whether efficient algorithms can match the offline $1-1/e$ guarantee. We resolve this problem by proving that the supremum approximation achievable with polynomially many value queries and worst-case constant recourse is $$β=2-\sqrt2\approx0.5858<1-1/e.$$ For every $\varepsilon>0$, our randomized algorithm attains $β-\varepsilon$ with $O(\varepsilon^{-2})$ changes per insertion. Any fixed improvement requires exponentially many queries before one critical insertion or linear recourse of $Ω(k)$ changes at that insertion, even with unlimited queries afterwards. This gap quantifies the cost of consistency: the current oracle hides which elements will be needed after an arrival. We also determine the exact curvature-dependent threshold $1-(\sqrt2-1)\vartheta$, attain $1-1/e-\varepsilon$ for weighted coverage with $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$ recourse, and separate the existence of universal future-price certificates from their efficient computation. Our algorithm has a bounded-bit polynomial-time implementation for polynomial-bit rational oracle answers; the lower bound uses only logarithmic-bit rational answers.

We study decentralized online optimization of upper-linearizable payoffs over an action set under efficient separation access, with applications to online continuous diminishing-return (DR) submodular maximization. We propose Decentralized Barrier Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (Dec-BFTRL), and evaluate each agent's played action against the average of all local objectives. Each agent maps an internal iterate to a feasible action through an approximate gauge projection, communicates only a cumulative surrogate-gradient dual state, and invokes the local HybridNewton procedure to approximately minimize its post-communication BFTRL potential. For every agent, we achieve expected network-aggregate regret of $\widetilde O(\sqrt{T})$. Over $T$ rounds, each agent uses $T$ neighbor-mixing steps and $\widetilde O(T)$ separation-oracle calls. We give four wrapper instantiations covering three DR-submodular maximization problems.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are highly effective in retrieving semantically relevant images. However, in practice, relevance alone is often insufficient. Systems must also achieve Result Diversification (RD) across composite attributes such as geography and time, a task for which precise control remains challenging. Current re-ranking methods, such as Multi-Source Determinantal Point Processes (MS-DPP), address this using manifold-based repulsion over similarity representations. Although this strategy is effective for broad exploration, it exposes a key limitation in manifold-based models: when subjected to diversity-decrease tasks on discrete metadata, they suffer substantial degradation in early-rank recall. To bridge this gap, we introduce MASCOT (Model-Aware Submodular Coverage for Composite-Attribute Text-to-Image Retrieval). Instead of relying on manifold repulsion, MASCOT formulates multi-attribute diversity as a resource allocation problem, projecting attributes into a soft-binning space weighted by query-driven importance. Averaged across the three PixelProse diversity-decrease tasks, MASCOT preserves an early-rank recall (R@10) of 88.58%, while MS-DPP retains 67.63%. The margin widens under composite constraints: on PP_geo_hour, where temporal and geographic diversity must be suppressed simultaneously, MS-DPP's recall collapses from 0.9737 to 0.4931 and its top-ranked result degrades to R@1 = 0.23, while MASCOT holds R@10 = 0.9410 and R@1 = 0.7202 at a diversity metric above the unconstrained baseline. We do not claim uniform superiority: on aggregate diversity-relevance scores our own simpler ablations attain higher harmonic means on all three decrease tasks, and MASCOT's advantage is specific to recall beyond rank 1 under composite constraints.

We study nonnegative submodular maximization subject to a general matroid when the offline algorithm is given an arbitrary controlled value oracle. Our main result is an adversarial resilience theorem for the Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process (SGS-Poisson): without modifying its Poisson intensity, single-element exchange rule, or spiteful drop step, the algorithm retains limiting approximation factors $1/e$ for non-monotone objectives and $1-1/e$ for monotone objectives. More precisely, under every controlled oracle $\widehat f$ satisfying $|\widehat f(S)-f(S)|\le ξ$ for every set $S$, our implementation returns a feasible set with expected value at least $(1/e-\varepsilon)\OPT-O(kξ)$ and $(1-1/e-\varepsilon)\OPT-O(kξ)$, respectively, using $\widetilde O(nk^2\varepsilon^{-2})$ oracle calls. As a consequence, the offline-to-online reduction yields full-bandit CMAB algorithms for general matroid-constrained submodular rewards with exact limiting approximation-regret factors $1/e$ and $1-1/e$ and $\widetilde O(n^{1/5}k^{4/5}T^{4/5})$ regret.

Evolutionary multitasking is a recent approach that solves multiple related optimization problems within a single evolutionary run, rather than addressing each problem separately. We consider monotone submodular optimization problems with dynamic knapsack constraints and study a multitasking formulation in which all tasks share a common monotone submodular function $f$, but differ in their constraints. We focus on the case where elements within each constraint have uniform cost and show that this structure leads to small Pareto fronts in the multitasking formulation. This enables solution sharing across tasks and can improve performance compared to running standard evolutionary approaches independently, depending on the constraint regime. Using rigorous runtime analysis, we analyze the expected time until the proposed multitasking algorithms obtain a $(1 - 1/e)$-approximation for each task. Experimental results for the Maximum Coverage problem complement the theoretical analysis and provide further insight into the practical behavior of the approach across different budget settings.

Sub-model federated learning lets resource-constrained clients train width-reduced versions of a global model, but existing methods allocate capacity by device resources alone. A natural next step, allocating capacity by each client's data heterogeneity as estimated from the updates the server already observes, has been repeatedly suggested. We ask whether that step is possible, using HAS-FL, an adaptive capacity-allocation framework, as a test case. Our findings are threefold. First, validated against ground-truth label-distribution divergence on reproducible partitions, update-divergence estimates of client heterogeneity are dominated by capacity rather than data: across two corrected estimators, multiple datasets, and all seeds, the estimates correlate strongly and negatively with device capacity, and no data signal remains once capacity is controlled for. This previously undocumented confound affects any method estimating client statistics from sub-model updates. Second, adaptive allocation has a hidden failure mode: when every client is capped below full width, the uncovered parameters stay at random initialization and progressively corrupt the global model. A simple coverage guarantee removes the failure and explains why uniform allocation collapses. Third, a matched-budget control settles what adaptivity contributes: random allocation to the same average budget performs no differently on both image benchmarks, and on the naturally partitioned text benchmark the adaptive policy is the weakest of the three strategies while consuming the most capacity. Sub-model training remains valuable because it admits constrained clients at quadratically reduced cost, but what protects accuracy is parameter coverage rather than allocation intelligence. Its apparent benefits come from capacity budgeting and coverage, and future designs need heterogeneity signals separable from capacity effects.

Submodular Information Measures (SIMs) have recently emerged as a powerful framework for representation learning and multimodal learning. In particular, the SCORE framework~\cite{majee2024score} demonstrated that SIMs can serve as effective objectives for supervised contrastive learning. Despite their empirical success, however, the geometric and statistical properties induced by different submodular information measures remain poorly understood. In this work, we develop a unified theoretical framework connecting SIMs to classical concepts in representation learning and statistical pattern recognition. We show that Total Information (TI) objectives characterize intra-class structure: Graph Cut TI recovers within-class variance, LogDet TI recovers generalized variance and covariance volume, and Facility Location TI induces imbalance-aware separation that emphasizes rare and confusable classes. We further show that Mutual Information (MI) objectives capture complementary notions of inter-class structure: Graph Cut MI is closely related to centroid separation and Fisher-style discrimination, LogDet MI captures covariance-aware separation through Mahalanobis distance, and Facility Location MI measures nearest-mode representational overlap. We validate these theoretical characterizations using controlled synthetic experiments that independently vary variance, covariance, class imbalance, class separation, and multimodal overlap. Across all settings, the empirical behavior closely matches the proposed theory. Our results provide the first unified geometric and statistical understanding of submodular information measures and offer principled guidance for selecting and designing SIM-based objectives for representation learning.

We study whether strictly positive marginal values restore the compatibility of envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Pareto optimality (PO) for indivisible goods. For two agents, we identify the exact threshold in the number of goods. Every instance with at most seven goods and strictly increasing valuations admits an allocation that is both EF1 and PO, without any submodularity assumption. In contrast, we construct an eight-good instance with normalized, integer-valued, strictly increasing, submodular valuations in which every EF1 allocation is strictly Pareto dominated. Thus, eight goods are necessary and sufficient for a two-agent counterexample. Finally, we strengthen the three-agent NP-hardness result of Chandramouleeswaran and Nimbhorkar (2026): deciding whether an EF1 and PO allocation exists remains NP-hard for normalized, integer-valued, monotone submodular valuations even when zero marginals are confined to eight fixed agent-good pairs, all involving a single agent.

Interactive driving, wherein an intelligent lead vehicle equipped with real-time traffic data coordinates route choices of connected vehicles, offers a promising approach to dynamic traffic management. To address the challenge of harmonising decisions, this paper considers the strategic information revealing framework of Bayesian persuasion. Here, the principal (lead vehicle) aims to guide the agent's (connected vehicle) partially observable sequential decision making towards its own objectives by selectively revealing information, such as real-time traffic ahead, using signals. However, the agent's farsighted response to maximize its long-term reward, renders the principal's signaling strategy design computationally challenging. We propose an online structured reinforcement learning framework to synthesize computationally efficient signaling strategy which is persuasive for a far-sighted agent. The main contributions of the paper are as follows: (i) For a monotonic agent with approximate best response, we propose MAPL, a structured policy learning algorithm for faster online learning, (ii) Identification of sufficient conditions for the supermodular structure of the Q function of the principal for a monotonic agent, (iii) Identification of sufficient conditions to ensure the persuasiveness of the principal's signaling strategy, (iv) Supermodular Q learning for Principal (SQP), which leverages the supermodular structure of principal's action value to synthesize computationally efficient signaling strategy that is persuasive for a monotonic learning agent, (v) Numerical analysis considering a real-time application of Bayesian persuasive driving for lane selection demonstrates that the proposed method is 30% cost efficient for optimising travelling rewards of both the lead and connected vehicle compared to the existing methodologies for signaling strategy design.

Learning neural set functions is pivotal to a wide range of important applications, including compound selection in AI-driven drug discovery and product recommendation. Recent work has introduced optimal subset oracles to implicitly learn set functions under practical weakly supervised settings, where model parameters are optimized through mean-field variational inference. However, these frameworks rely on Monte Carlo sampling to estimate gradients of the evidence lower bound when updating the variational distribution. Repeated sampling across iterations incurs substantial computational overhead, while the resulting stochasticity can destabilize the optimization trajectory. In this work, we reinterpret the evidence lower bound as a continuous relaxation of the set function and learn a surrogate objective that replaces sampling-based ELBO gradient estimation during variational optimization. The learned surrogate provides stable and efficient gradients throughout the continuous domain, thereby reducing computational overhead and accelerating inference. Furthermore, we establish an approximation guarantee for the proposed framework under submodular maximization and characterize its connection to variational free energy. Experiments on a variety of real-world tasks demonstrate consistent improvements over existing baselines.

Submodular maximization is an important building block for developing algorithms in many areas such as machine learning and data mining. Due to the NP-hardness of the problem, analysis of submodular maximization algorithms typically provides pessimistic worst-case approximation factors only. It is not easy to evaluate how close a produced solution is to an optimal one for a given problem instance. In this paper, we develop new data-dependent upper bounds for submodular maximization with a knapsack constraint. We theoretically prove that they dominate the optimal solution and empirically demonstrate their advantages in certifying how close to optimal a solution is through experiments with real-world datasets.

We study LLM benchmark coreset selection: selecting a small subset of prompts over multiple benchmarks whose induced model scores and rankings approximate those obtained from the full benchmark suite. In evaluation-unsupervised benchmark coreset selection (our approach), the selection algorithm uses no model evaluation outcomes, and operates on a fine granularity by producing subsets of prompts over multiple benchmarks rather than producing a sub-collection of entire benchmarks. We use submodular subset selection, and we develop and evaluate many different submodular functions for this purpose, including determinantal point process (DPP) based approaches, submodular mutual information functions, and facility location-based functions. On a new large-scale suite of 35 heterogeneous benchmarks spanning five different capability categories, 18 frontier LLMs, and over 61K prompts, we find that the facility location (FL) function operating exclusively on inexpensive semantic prompt embeddings preserves LLM scores better than twelve separate score-based and diversity-based baselines, across a range of coreset budgets. Moreover, we show our proposed objective is not limited to the evaluation-unsupervised regime: in the setting where only a handful of whole benchmarks must be selected and a large amount of model scores are available, the same objective matches or outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on the MMLU and MTEB leaderboards, while being substantially cheaper to compute. Together, our results suggest that submodularity, in general, is a strong and reliable tool for benchmark compression.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) under a fixed reader-context budget forces a selection problem: of the evidence retrieved, only a fraction can be shown to the reader. We argue that document recall -- the standard retrieval metric -- is the wrong quantity to optimize in this regime, and we make two contributions. First, as a general contribution, we introduce answer-in-context, a diagnostic that measures whether a gold answer survives as a contiguous span in the packed reader context (not the retrieved set). It predicts answer F1 better than recall (r=0.39-0.55 vs. about 0.31), separates answer quality roughly five-fold (0.60 vs. 0.12 on HotpotQA), and carries information beyond retrieval: it adds Delta R squared=0.17 over recall and shows a 4.6x EM gap even among questions where all gold was retrieved. We also confirm it interventionally: on 2WikiMultiHopQA a packing change that raises coverage but not answer-in-context yields no accuracy gain. Second, as a conditional contribution, we cast reader-context construction as budgeted monotone submodular maximization and build a packer that jointly optimizes relevance, query coverage, representativeness, and diversity. On HotpotQA with a 160-token budget and a 3B reader it beats a strong focused heuristic, MMR, and naive packing -- by up to +5.1 F1 at equal-or-lower token cost, across three seeds. Crucially, we map the scope of this win honestly: it requires the conjunction of (i) multi-hop complementary structure, (ii) retrieval that surfaces the evidence, (iii) a binding but not extreme budget, and (iv) a reader weak enough that evidence density, not reading capacity, is the bottleneck. A quantization-controlled reader-scale ladder (3B to 7B to 14B) shows the edge over the heuristic is absorbed by 7B and significantly reverses by 14B, while the diagnostic explains every boundary with a single variable.

We study distributed online submodular maximization under partition matroid constraints, in which multiple agents select a limited number of actions from their own subsets sequentially to maximize the cumulative value of a sequence of objective functions. We develop a unified algorithmic framework that accommodates full-information and bandit feedback models. For both feedback models, we prove that the proposed algorithms achieve sublinear $(1-1/e)$-regret guarantees, which are comparable to those achieved by existing centralized counterparts. Furthermore, to tackle the sampling violation issue caused by continuous relaxation and rounding, we develop a bounded stochastic pipage rounding scheme and show that the probability of sampling violation vanishes asymptotically. As a result, the cumulative sampling violation remains sublinear in $T$, which is further shown to be not improvable under certain conditions. Numerical results validate the theoretical findings in this paper.

Selecting a fixed number of representative points from a finite Pareto-front approximation is a fundamental post-processing task in multiobjective optimization. This paper studies this problem for the integral R2 indicator in three objectives, where the indicator is defined as the integral of the lower envelope of weighted Tchebycheff scalarizations over the two-dimensional weight simplex. We provide two complementary algorithmic results. On the positive side, we show that the integral R2 improvement with respect to any fixed baseline is a monotone submodular set function. For the usual ideal-point based R2 indicator, with the ideal point fixed, this yields a direct gap-reduction guarantee: greedy selection closes at least a $(1-1/e)$-fraction of the maximum possible R2 gap between a fixed dominated anchor value and the best cardinality-$k$ value. We also give a tested greedy implementation that evaluates exact integral R2 values by subdivision, with worst-case running time $O(n^6)$. On the negative side, we prove that exact fixed-cardinality subset selection is NP-hard already in three objectives. The hardness proof uses a perspective transformation that maps Tchebycheff-shadow improvements to a weighted anchored-box union problem with density $(x_1+x_2+x_3)^{-4}$, and then adapts the three-dimensional anchored-box construction of Bringmann, Cabello, and Emmerich. Together, these results separate the tractable two-objective case from the three-objective case while identifying a principled approximation route based on submodular optimization.

Trustworthy AI requires reliable data-processing pipelines, not only robust downstream predictive models. As an upstream component, data summarization determines which information is retained and passed to subsequent learning or decision modules. Therefore, adversarial perturbations to the summarization process can compromise trustworthy AI in an upstream manner: they may alter the selected summary, reduce its representativeness, and further degrade the utility of subsequent learning tasks. In this paper, we study adversarial attacks on continuous data summarization under similarity-level perturbations through DR-submodular optimization. We show that a class of multi-resolution image summarization objectives can be formulated as multilinear extensions of non-negative submodular set functions and satisfy DR-submodularity with $m$-weak monotonicity. We then formulate multi-target attack generation as a min-max problem, where one admissible perturbation of the similarity structure is optimized to degrade multiple target summarization models. To mitigate such perturbations, we formulate robust defense against mixed attack types as a regularized max-min problem. For both problems, we develop approximation algorithms with theoretical guarantees. Experiments on real-data and controlled clustered benchmarks show that the proposed attack is effective in representative low-to-moderate budget regimes and can induce downstream task-performance loss. The proposed defense improves the robustness--mitigation trade-off in structured settings, while also revealing the parameter sensitivity of robust protection on real data.

Submodular function minimization has gained a lot of interest in recent years. They are highly applicable in the area of Computer Vision and Machine Learning. Often such applications require to work with submodular functions defined on distributive lattice. Current best way of dealing with it is using a transformation which extrapolates the submodular function for the respective boolean lattice. It makes optimization system too inefficient due to enlargement of the working space. Quantitatively, the expanded space has additional exponential (in set size) number of elements. We propose a generic framework for dealing with distributive lattice which only works within distributive lattice. Our framework allows one to use already established submodular function minimization algorithms for boolean lattice. In our experiment, we show the huge improvement in terms of running time over tranditional methods for handling distributive lattice.

Consistency is an important property in dynamic submodular maximization and entails maintaining a near-optimal solution at all times, making only a small number of adjustments to the solution in each step. Prior work has explored this question for the insertion-only case, where the algorithm faces a stream of $n$ insertions, and has established lower and upper bounds for the cardinality-constrained version of the problem. We consider this question in the fully dynamic setting, where the stream of operations may contain both insertions and deletions. We develop a general framework for designing algorithms for this setting, and instantiate it to obtain the first constant-factor approximations with sublinear consistency. For cardinality constraints, we propose a $\frac 12 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation that is $O\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent. For rank-$k$ matroid constraints, we construct a $\frac 14 - O(\varepsilon)$ approximation to the dynamic optimum that is $O\left(\frac{\log k}{\varepsilon^2}\right)$ consistent.

Submodular optimization has become a fundamental paradigm for data selection, retrieval, summarization, and representation learning due to its ability to model coverage, diversity, and representativeness. However, classical submodular objectives optimize only the selected subset and do not explicitly preserve structural information between the selected subset and the remaining data. In many modern machine learning applications, including train/validation/test splitting, benchmark construction, and robust subset selection, the quality of a selection depends critically on preserving balanced structure across both the selected subset and its complement. In this work, we introduce Complement Submodular Information (CSI), a new class of complement-aware submodular objectives that quantify shared structural information between a subset and its complement. Our framework induces complement-aware variants of several classical submodular functions including Facility Location, Graph Cut, LogDet, Saturated Coverage, Set Cover, Probabilistic Set Cover, and Feature Based Functions. We analyze the theoretical properties of CSI objectives and show that they exhibit approximate monotonicity under bounded curvature conditions, leading to near-$(1-1/e)$ greedy approximation guarantees. Empirically, CSI objectives consistently outperform standard submodular objectives on robust hidden-slice-aware subset selection. In particular, CSI objectives significantly improve preservation of coherent rare/tail semantic structure while simultaneously suppressing noisy and isolated outliers, leading to substantially improved downstream predictive performance. Synthetic experiments further illustrate how different CSI instantiations capture complementary notions of representativeness, diversity, connectivity, and balanced neighborhood preservation.

Many online decision problems over combinatorial actions are addressed via convex relaxations, leading to online convex optimization with piecewise linear objectives and induced polyhedral structure. We show that regret in such problems is governed by \emph{polyhedral instability}: the number of changes of the active region. Under full information feedback and fixed partition assumptions, if $\mathrm{RS}_T$ denotes the number of region switches and $V_{\max}$ the maximum number of vertices per region, we prove $\Regret_T= Θ(\sqrt{(1+\mathrm{RS}_T)\,T\,\log V_{\max}})$ interpolating between experts-like and dimension-dependent OCO rates. For online submodular--concave games under Lovász convexification, this reduces to the permutation-switch count $\mathrm{SC}_T$, yielding the matching rate $\Regret_T= Θ(\sqrt{(1+\mathrm{SC}_T)\,T\,\log n})$. Experiments on synthetic and real combinatorial problems (shortest path, influence maximization) validate the predicted scaling and indicate that low-instability regimes can arise in practice without explicit enumeration of actions.

Many high-stakes decisions in health care, public policy, and clinical development require committing to a single policy that will be applied uniformly across a heterogeneous population. Regulatory and fairness standards sometime requires that the chosen policy performs adequately in every pre-specified subpopulation, not only on average. We formalize this as a Selection of the Best with Fairness Constraints (SBFC) problem, in order to identify the policy with the highest average performance among those policies that meet a minimum per-subpopulation threshold. We establish an instance-specific lower bound on sample complexity of the SBFC problem. We then develop a Track-and-Stop with Constraints on Subpopulation (T-a-S-CS) algorithm that achieves the lower bound asymptotically. We extend the framework to general closed-set and penalty-based fairness specifications with matching guarantees. Numerical experiments and a case study using the International Stroke Trial demonstrate substantial efficiency gains over policy-level allocation baselines.

Organizations increasingly deploy multiple AI systems across task domains, but selecting a small, high-performing ensemble can require costly model calls, benchmark runs, and human evaluation. We study this selection problem as a distributional variant of multiwinner voting: tasks are drawn from an unknown domain distribution, each task induces feedback over candidate experts, and a committee's value on a task is determined by its best-performing member. We analyze both binary feedback, for tasks with correct/incorrect outcomes, and pairwise feedback, for tasks where candidate outputs are compared by preference. In the binary setting, the induced objective is coverage. We give exhaustive-elicitation baselines and matching worst-case query lower bounds, and we design a failure-conditioned greedy algorithm that preserves the standard $(1-1/e)$ guarantee while obtaining instance-dependent query savings. In the pairwise setting, we study $θ$-winning committees. We show that full-information optimization admits a PTAS but no EPTAS under Gap-ETH, and that the objective is monotone but not submodular. This motivates a weighted ordinal coverage relaxation, which is submodular and supports a failure-conditioned greedy oracle under pairwise feedback. We then convert this oracle back into $θ$-type guarantees through finite-family auditing or a minimax wrapper. We also provide small-scale LLM experiments illustrating the predicted query savings and the role of complementarity in committee selection.

Submodular functions -- functions exhibiting diminishing returns -- are central to machine learning. When the objective is monotone and non-negative, the greedy algorithm achieves a tight $63\%$ approximation. But many practical objectives incorporate costs that make them negative on some inputs, and all existing multiplicative guarantees require non-negativity. Prior work handles negativity through additive bounds for the special class of decomposable functions and non-monotonicity through partial-monotonicity parameters, but these address each difficulty in isolation and neither extends the classical structural theory. We extend \emph{curvature} -- a parameter measuring how far a function deviates from linearity -- to all submodular functions, handling both non-monotonicity and negativity through a single classical concept. A greedy algorithm with pruning achieves a curvature-controlled multiplicative ratio for \emph{any} submodular function, including those taking negative values -- the first such guarantee beyond monotonicity and non-negativity. In the non-monotone regime $1 \le c_g < 2.2$, the bound strictly beats the best known uniform ratio of $0.401$ (for non-negative $f$), and it recovers the classical $(1-e^{-c_g})/c_g$ guarantee for monotone functions. A multilinear-extension variant extends the framework to general combinatorial constraints via multilinear relaxation. Experiments on cost-penalized experimental design, coverage, feature selection, and a curvature sweep on Multi-News passage selection support the theory.

We formalize Rollout Informativeness under a Fixed Budget (RIFB) as the expected non-vanishing policy-gradient mass that a tool-use rollout set injects into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We prove that any budget-agnostic independent sampler suffers a collapse rate bounded away from zero for hard prompts regardless of the budget. Motivated by this, we recast intermediate state selection as a monotone submodular maximization problem, where a greedy one-step selector enjoys a 1 minus 1/e approximation guarantee. Our Uncertainty-aware Upper Confidence Bound (UUCB) terms arise as closed-form marginal gains of this objective. This turns the token-level entropy bonus from an empirical trick into an analytic consequence of the formulation. We present InfoTree, a training-time tree-search framework coupling UUCB with a learned Adaptive Budget Allocator (ABA) and an asynchronous Speculative Expansion scheme. ABA rescues prompts whose initial tree is wasted on uniform outcomes, lifting the mixed-outcome ratio from 58.1 percent to 76.3 percent with less than 5 percent budget overhead. Speculative Expansion reduces wall-clock overhead from 14.3 percent to 4.8 percent by tolerating bounded staleness in UUCB scores. Across nine benchmarks spanning math reasoning (AIME 2024 and 2025, MATH-500, OlympiadBench, USAMO), web-search agents (GAIA, HLE-100, BrowseComp-lite), and tool-rich coding and OS agents (APPS-verified, AgentBench-OS), InfoTree outperforms flat GRPO, DeepSearch, Tree-GRPO, AT2PO, CW-GRPO, and RC-GRPO. Head-to-head compositions with Tree-GRPO prefix sharing and CW-GRPO contribution weights deliver further gains, confirming that our selector operates orthogonally to rollout reuse and trajectory re-weighting. A 5 by 5 by 5 robustness grid reveals that over three quarters of the hyperparameter space lies on a performance plateau, confirming UUCB robustness.

We consider selective classification with abstention in the fixed-pool (or transductive) setting, where the unlabeled pool is given beforehand and only a subset of points can be queried for labels. Our main insight is to view selective prediction through agreement: given queried labels and Lipschitz margin constraints in an embedding space, the version space of Lipschitz-consistent classification heads is well defined. We obtain upper and lower Lipschitz margin bounds that define, for each pool point, a set of certified valid labels containing the prediction of every head in the version space. The model therefore predicts only when the label is forced (i.e., all consistent heads agree), and abstains otherwise. We also propose a monotone submodular geometric proxy for budgeted querying, and show that a greedy algorithm retains the standard approximation factor.

Evaluating large language models across many benchmarks is expensive, yet many benchmarks are highly correlated. We formalize the selection of a small, informative subset as submodular maximization under a multivariate Gaussian model. Entropy (log-determinant covariance) and mutual information between selected and remaining benchmarks arise as natural objectives. Both are submodular; entropy selection coincides with pivoted Cholesky and has spectral residual bounds, while mutual information is non-monotone in general but empirically monotone for small subsets, so we optimize it greedily. Experiments on three matrices from ten public leaderboards show that mutual information selection outperforms entropy for imputation at small subsets.

When, in terms of the number of data points, the size of a dataset exceeds available computing resources, or when labeling is expensive, an attractive solution consists of selecting only some of the data points (subdata) for further consideration. A central question for selecting subdata of size $n$ from $N$ available data points is which $n$ points to select. While an answer to this question depends on the objective, one approach for a parametric model and a focus on parameter estimation is to select subdata that retains maximal information. Identifying such subdata is a classical NP-hard problem due to its inherent discreteness. Based on optimal approximate design theory, we develop a new methodology for information-based subdata selection, resulting in subdata that approaches the optimal solution. To achieve this, we develop a novel algorithm that applies to a general model, accommodates arbitrary choices of $N$ and $n$, and supports multiple optimality criteria, and we prove its convergence. Moreover, the new methodology facilitates an assessment of the efficiency of subdata selected by any method by obtaining tight lower and upper bounds for the efficiency. We show that the subdata obtained through the new methodology is highly efficient and outperforms all existing methods.

Pareto optimization via evolutionary multi-objective algorithms has been shown to efficiently solve constrained monotone submodular functions. Traditionally when solving multiple problems, the algorithm is run for each problem separately. We introduce multitasking formulations of these problems that are an effective way to solve multiple related problems with a single run. In our setting the given problems share a monotone submodular function $f$ but have different knapsack constraints. We examine the case where elements within a constraint have the same cost and show that our multitasking formulations result in small Pareto fronts. This allows the population to share solutions between all problems leading to significant improvements compared to running several classical approaches independently. Using rigorous runtime analysis, we analyze the expected time until the introduced multitasking approaches obtain a $(1-1/e)$-approximation for each of the given problems. Our experimental investigations for the maximum coverage problem give further insight into the dynamics behind how the approach works and doesn't work in practice for problems where elements within a constraint also have varied costs.