Typology

Some properties of languages, e.g., subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, are more prevalent than others among the thousands of attested natural languages (NLs). Such typological commonality is often attributed to learning biases. Computational simulations, recently with language models (LMs), have facilitated the exploration of this theory. In this paper, we extend existing analyses of the relationship between LMs' learning biases and typological commonality on both data and model sides, focusing on: (i) cross-serial dependencies, the upper limit of attested syntactic complexity, and (ii) stack-based LMs (SLMs), potentially facilitating learning of hierarchical patterns. We first evaluate generalization of SLMs on cross-serial dependencies across diverse artificial languages and confirm that they struggle with such constructions. However, SLMs with limited working memory generalize better suggesting a possible basis for such inductive bias and thus the typological commonality of some word order configurations.

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across various natural language processing tasks. However, their robustness to typographical errors remains underexplored, particularly in Japanese, where text input involves multiple writing systems and IME-based conversion. In this study, we evaluate the robustness of Japanese LLMs against realistic Japanese-specific typos. We introduce five typo categories: Character Transposition, Character Replacement, Homophone Conversion, Japanese IME Conversion, and Full-Width Conversion. These perturbations are applied to three Japanese benchmark datasets (JMMLU, JCommonsenseQA, and JamC-QA), and eleven Japanese and multilingual LLMs are evaluated. The results show that Character Transposition and Character Replacement typos consistently reduce accuracy across benchmarks, whereas IME Conversion, Full-Width Conversion, and Homophone Conversion have relatively limited impact. These findings reveal that current Japanese LLMs remain vulnerable to realistic Japanese typing errors, particularly those that substantially distort the original input, highlighting the importance of robustness evaluation in practical input environments.

Cross-lingual transfer describes how knowledge in a source language benefits a target language. Measuring it quantitatively requires broad multilingual pre-training, as prior work has done with cross-lingual transfer matrices. We ask whether transfer is predictable from freely available typological features, and whether the prominence of high-resource source languages reflects typology or data quality and quantity. We show that typological databases contain cheap and dense signals about cross-lingual transfer. Our typology-only random forest on a 24-language prior-work transfer matrix scores leave-one-language-out $ρ{=}0.705$ and $R^2{=}0.49$, beating a non-typological control at $ρ{=}0.62$, which verifies the ability of typology-only predictions to reconstruct costly measured cross-lingual transfer. The signal survives leave-one-script-out and leave-one-family-out protocols, so script and family confounding do not explain the effect. By decomposing the transfer into a typology term and a resource-and-script bias term, we find the best-source ranking sensitive to this bias. In contrast, typology is not affected by this bias, which makes it a zero-compute screening tool that replaces hundreds of training runs with a model fit. Our code is available \href{https://github.com/dharmsen/typo-x-ling-transfer}{here}.

Linguistic typology relies on expert analysis of reference grammars across languages, making large-scale crosslinguistic comparison labor-intensive and unscalable. We introduce AUTOTYPOLOGIST, an LLM agent for evidence-grounded typological analysis over reference grammars. The agent is capable of retrieving relevant grammar sections, analyzing interlinear glossed text (IGT), and iteratively reasoning over typological hypotheses using a ReAct-style workflow. We evaluate the system on TYPOLOGICAL FEATURE CODING against expert annotations and TYPOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING with typological universals using 25 open-source reference grammars. Operating under different information constraints in TYPOLOGICAL FEATURE CODING, the agent can synthesize information from reference grammar prose but still faces challenges with only IGTs in the target language. In TYPOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING, the agent can synthesize crosslinguistic evidence and identify both supporting cases and counterexamples. These findings suggest that LLM agents can support scalable and inspectable typological analysis, while still requiring expert validation.

Typological features are widely used in multilingual NLP, and the prediction of such features holds downstream utility. However, existing methods to predict missing values lack interpretable justifications for predictions, while their performance across resource levels and feature types remains underexplored. Given LLMs' abilities in meta-linguistic reasoning and in providing rationales, we investigate LLMs' performance in typological feature prediction via an in-context learning approach with linguistic data from URIEL+ and Glottolog. We find that zero-shot prompting is insufficient, but when given phylogenetic and geographic neighbour evidence, LLMs substantially outperform all baselines without disadvantaging low-resource languages. We further find that most LLM rationales are consistent with the provided evidence, offering a step toward explainable typological feature prediction.

Second language writing research distinguishes grammatical accuracy from native-like idiomaticity, yet automated writing evaluation often conflates these dimensions. This study introduces a layered LLM-correction pipeline that isolates structural errors from unnaturalness by generating literal error corrections and idiomatic revisions for 3,830 English writing samples from 120 Japanese junior high school students. Applying the regex-based CEFR-J grammar extractor, we quantify two diagnostic measures: accuracy gaps (structures attempted but incorrectly produced) and idiomatic gaps (grammatically correct structures underused or overused relative to native norms). Results reveal distinct patterns: definite articles, third-person singular -s, and modals (would, could) exhibit significant accuracy difficulties, while -ing forms and hypothetical modals (would) show the largest idiomatic underuse, with simple present verbs, subject-verb-object patterns, and modal can conversely exhibiting the most pronounced overuse. A two-dimensional instructional typology maps error rates against idiomatic gaps, distinguishing accurate but overused grammar items from error-prone or avoided complex forms requiring targeted production practice. This framework advances pedagogical feedback by enabling teachers to diagnose whether learner difficulties arise from inaccurate execution, structural avoidance, or L1-mapped overreliance, supporting evidence-based interventions tailored to the specific needs of each learner.

The intersection of artificial intelligence adoption, cybersecurity governance, and public sector institutional constraints has not been examined as a unified analytical problem in the existing literature. Studies address AI cybersecurity risks generically, public sector governance independently, and framework adequacy separately. Existing studies have not integrated these three streams to explain specifically how AI adoption causes cybersecurity governance failure in government organizations, nor test existing governance instruments against AI-specific public sector failure causes. This paper ad-dresses that gap. It proposes a seven-domain typology identifying ten specific AI-driven cyber governance failure causes grounded in public sector institutional analysis. It presents a three-pathway failure model showing how accountability failure, opera-tional resilience failure, and compliance failure interact and reinforce each other. It de-livers a structured coverage matrix testing five major governance frameworks (NIST CSF 2.0, ISO/IEC 27001, COBIT, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001) against the typology, finding that no instrument addresses Shadow AI, speed asymmetry, or gov-ernance vacuum at the operational specificity required for public sector application. The paper introduces speed asymmetry as a named structural construct with a specified mechanism. The framework provides the design specification for an AI-enabled cyber-security maturity model for government organizations.

Macroareas are geographical areas used in typological research for grouping variables of interest. In linguistic typology, languages in a given macroarea are considered to have potential for contact, in contrast to those outside the area, where contact is less likely. Along with language family membership, macroareas are used as controls for models in linguistic typology, in an attempt to address the problem of autocorrelation - the observation that historical developments or typological patterns may be due to contact between neighboring languages and/or inheritance from a common ancestral language. Macroareas are therefore a central aspect of research that seeks to separate universal properties of language from local (or language-specific) properties. Existing macroareas largely depend on expert determinations of what constitutes a geographical area of potential contact, and to date have mainly aligned with continents or landmasses (Hammarström and Donohue 2014; Nichols, Witzlack-Makarevich, and Bickel 2013). While there are various historical and theoretical reasons for these groupings, there as of yet has been no systematic approach to identifying such areas for a given region. This paper attempts to address such a gap and move beyond macroarea to identification of language areas of relatively arbitrary size, presenting a simple geographical clustering method for identifying groupings over any area. The method produces a set of worldwide macroareas that largely align with existing groupings, as well as local groupings for a well-known sprachbund.

This article tackles an important phenomenon in the syntax of Yemeni Ibbi Arabic (YIA), viz., wh-agreement, a phenomenon common to several languages including Greek, Indonesian, Lubukusu, Irish, etc. In YIA, wh-agreement manifests itself via agreement inflections on the Wh-Op, C, T/V, v. To account for this phenomenon, we propose an Agree across phases (AAP) approach anchored in the mechanism of Feature Inheritance (FI) in which Agree as MATCHING (AM) is a bit separated from feature valuation (FV). AM concerns Cs/vs, but FV Ts/Vs. Analyzing the agreement patterns observed between Wh-Op(erators), functional heads (precisely C, (T), v), and verbal complexes, we argue that the suffixes -eh, -uh, -nen, -um, having undergone grammaticalization process from Stannard Arabic (SA) third person pronouns, function as morphological marking of wh-agreement. Findings indicate that YIA data offer a unique empirical contribution to generative syntax, specifically concerning wh-agreement in this dialect operating via MATCHING mechanism. Our proposal straightforwardly accounts for wh-agreement cross-linguistically. This study provides further evidence that incorporating under-investigated typology provides further support for the universality of Universal Grammar (UG) by revealing how specific I-language operations reflect deeper, invariant principles of human language architecture. It concludes that the wh-agreement mechanism in YIA is more morphosyntactically robust than in languages such as Greek, Indonesian, Palauan, and Irish, providing compelling evidence for AAP as a UG approach to long-distance dependencies.

Research on artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sector often treats "AI" as a single category, neglecting technical distinctions between different AI systems. But these distinctions affect how different systems impact core public values like accountability, procedural justice, and non-discrimination. This paper argues that public administration research would benefit from more technical precision on "AI" and makes three contributions to this end. First, we introduce a typology of five categories of AI systems: hand-coded, glass-box, black-box, general-purpose, and agentic systems. We calibrate the typology to public administration by grouping system types by their distinct implications for public values. Second, we evaluate technical precision in recent public administration research about AI by coding 91 highly-cited papers (2019-2025) using our typology. We find widespread imprecision: most papers (55%) leave the studied system underspecified, 31% motivate their work with a different system than they study, and 41% make more general conclusions than the studied system supports. Finally, we give practical recommendations for future research. We highlight common pitfalls to avoid, and suggest that researchers should, at a minimum, provide enough technical detail to locate the studied system in our typology. To this end, we provide a practical guide -- a short set of diagnostic questions answerable from public information and without specialist technical knowledge.

This article aims to evaluate the quality of machine translation (MT) and post-editing (PE) in the context of specialised translation from English into French. Three MT systems (DeepL, eTranslation and Systran) were compared, and two groups of post-editors -linguists/translators and NLP experts -were asked to perform post-editing. Translation assessment is based on error annotation using an error typology adapted to MT and PE evaluation. The results reveal significant differences between the three MT systems and the two groups of post-editors, particularly in terms of terminological accuracy and fluency. This study highlights the importance of domain knowledge in specialised translation, as well as the limitations and variable performance of MT systems in language for specific purposes (LSP).

Brain-LLM alignment is well established in English, yet the brain's language network is neuroanatomically universal across languages. Does alignment also generalize cross-linguistically, and what governs the variation? We test this using fMRI data from 112 participants across English, Chinese, and French (the Le Petit Prince corpus) and seven LLMs spanning English-dominant, Chinese-dominant, and multilingual architectures. Our central finding is that training-language dominance, not an inherent property of English, drives the alignment pattern: a Chinese-dominant model (Baichuan2-7B), architecture-matched to LLaMA-2-7B, reverses the gradient entirely, aligning best with Chinese brains and worst with English. Beyond training dominance, formal typological distance independently covaries with alignment degradation, syntax-associated brain regions (IFG) show $2.3\times$ steeper typological gradients than lexico-semantic regions (PTL), and tokenization fertility accounts for $\sim$60% of a cross-linguistic shift in optimal encoding layer. These results reveal that the apparent "English advantage" in brain-LLM alignment is an artifact of training data composition, while the remaining variation reflects genuine typological structure concentrated in syntactic processing.

Compositional speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) systems built upon speech large language models (SpeechLLMs) have recently shown promising performance. However, existing S2ST systems often either neglect source-language information or encode it through a language-as-label paradigm, representing each source language as an independent flat embedding. Such a design overlooks systematic linguistic structure shared across languages, which may limit data-efficient multilingual adaptation when supervised S2ST data are scarce. To address this issue, we propose S2ST-Omni 2, a many-to-one compositional S2ST framework that systematically reformulates multilingual language conditioning from flat language labels to structured typological priors. Specifically, S2ST-Omni 2 revisits language conditioning at three levels: typology-informed hierarchical language encoding for structured source-language representation, dynamically-gated language-aware Dual-CTC for content-adaptive acoustic modulation, and typology-aware LLM prompting for decoder-side linguistic guidance. Experiments on CVSS-C show that S2ST-Omni 2 achieves superior average performance among representative S2ST approaches across BLEU, COMET, ASR-BLEU, and BLASER 2.0 under the adopted evaluation protocol. Ablation studies indicate that the proposed representation-level, acoustic-level, and decoding-level strategies provide complementary benefits. Moreover, controlled data-budget analyses and a Japanese-to-English evaluation using only approximately 3 hours of supervised training data suggest that explicit typological priors provide useful inductive biases for data-efficient multilingual S2ST.

Many of the thousands of attested languages share common configurations of features, creating a spectrum from typologically very rare (e.g., object-verb-subject word order) or impossible languages to very common combinations of features (e.g., subject-object-verb word order). One central question is under what conditions such typological tendencies can be predicted, and specifically whether the learning bias of language models (LMs) is sufficient to reproduce such patterns. In this study, we add one dimensionality to such analysis -- the learning scenario for LMs -- to explore its interaction with the inductive bias of LMs. Specifically, as a first study, we examine the effect of curriculum learning (CL), as a developmentally motivated learning scenario, i.e., starting with simpler sentences rather than randomly-ordered input. We expand existing LM-based exploration (El-Naggar et al., 2025a,b) with a simple CL variant and find that CL substantially impacts the apparent inductive bias of LMs.

Informal settlements face disproportionate exposure to climate-related health hazards. However, existing methodologies lack systematic approaches to link diverse settlement characteristics with environmental health outcomes. We develop a data-driven framework to assess heat vulnerability in Rio de Janeiro's favelas by combining spatially-constrained clustering with land surface temperature (LST) analysis. Using remote sensing and geospatial features, we identify two distinct favela typologies: recent, well-connected settlements on flat terrain (Cluster 0) and historical, poorly-connected communities on vegetated slopes (Cluster 1). Analysis of 16 extreme heat events reveals systematic temperature differences of 2--3$^\circ$C between clusters, with flat-terrain favelas experiencing significantly higher heat exposure. Our findings demonstrate that settlement morphology critically influences heat vulnerability, providing a replicable framework for targeted urban planning and public health interventions in informal settlements globally.

Student engagement with large language models (LLMs) in academic writing is not a stable trait, an adoption decision, or a competency level; it is a continuously negotiated process that existing frameworks cannot adequately theorize. Typological models provide categories without mechanisms; technology acceptance models explain adoption but not post-adoption quality; AI literacy frameworks treat competency as a static predictor rather than a live input. None accounts for within-student variability across tasks, the developmental paradox whereby experience produces habituation rather than sophistication, or principled non-use as a form of ethical reasoning. This article introduces the Reliance Negotiation Framework (RNF), developed from a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study of 382 undergraduates at a public minority-serving institution in the United States (survey, N = 382; 14 semi-structured interviews; three qualitative survey strands; 1,435 coded instances). The RNF reconceptualizes LLM reliance as an ongoing negotiation among four concurrent inputs (perceived benefits, perceived risks, ethical commitments, and situational demands) with outputs that recursively modify subsequent decisions. A Two-Model Architecture accommodates the 13.0% of participants whose categorical ethical commitments foreclose negotiation entirely. The framework generates four falsifiable predictions with implications for AI literacy pedagogy, academic integrity policy, and equity-centered practice at minority-serving institutions.

Cycling is reported by an average of 35% of adults at least once per week across 28 countries, and as vulnerable road users directly exposed to their surroundings, cyclists experience the street at an intensity unmatched by other modes. Yet the street-level features that shape this experience remain under-analysed, particularly in historical urban contexts where spatial constraints rule out large-scale infrastructural change and where typological context is often overlooked. This study develops a perception-led, typology-based, and data-integrated framework that explicitly models street typologies and their sub-classifications to evaluate how visual and spatial configurations shape cycling experience. Drawing on the Cambridge Cycling Experience Video Dataset (CCEVD), a first-person and handlebar-mounted corpus developed in this study, we extract fine-grained streetscape indicators with computer vision and pair them with built-environment variables and subjective ratings from a Balanced Incomplete Block Design (BIBD) survey, thereby constructing a typology-sensitive Bikeability Index that integrates subjective and perceived dimensions with physical metrics for segment-level comparison. Statistical analysis shows that perceived bikeability arises from cumulative, context-specific interactions among features. While greenness and openness consistently enhance comfort and pleasure, enclosure, imageability, and building continuity display threshold or divergent effects contingent on street type and subtype. AI-assisted visual redesigns further demonstrate that subtle, targeted changes can yield meaningful perceptual gains without large-scale structural interventions. The framework offers a transferable model for evaluating and improving cycling conditions in heritage cities through perceptually attuned, typology-aware design strategies.

The URIEL+ linguistic knowledge base supports multilingual research by encoding languages through geographic, genetic, and typological vectors. However, data sparsity (e.g. missing feature types, incomplete language entries, and limited genealogical coverage) remains prevalent. This limits the usefulness of URIEL+ in cross-lingual transfer, particularly for supporting low-resource languages. To address this sparsity, we extend URIEL+ by introducing script vectors to represent writing system properties for 7,488 languages, integrating Glottolog to add 18,710 additional languages, and expanding lineage imputation for 26,449 languages by propagating typological and script features across genealogies. These improvements reduce feature sparsity by 14% for script vectors, increase language coverage by up to 19,015 languages (1,007%), and boost imputation quality metrics by up to 35%. Our benchmark on cross-lingual transfer tasks (oriented around low-resource languages) shows occasionally divergent performance compared to URIEL+, with performance gains up to 6% in certain setups.