Visually Grounded Reasoning

Ask about this topic

Overview

Visually grounded reasoning studies how models use images, video, diagrams, and other visual inputs to support conclusions and actions with relevant evidence. Common approaches include locating regions or pixels, building scene graphs and symbolic programs, interleaving visual inspection with language reasoning, and using active perception to seek additional views or details. Benchmarks test settings such as spatial and compositional questions, charts and diagrams, video events, and embodied planning, increasingly scoring evidence alignment as well as answer accuracy. A central challenge is that better perception does not guarantee that evidence will guide later reasoning: language priors and long reasoning traces can override visual details, while extra inspection or computation can be costly or ineffective.

Latest papers

CardsList

344 papers24 papers in the last four weeks, up 41% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

Apr 4, 2026

TableVision: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Spatially Grounded Reasoning over Complex Hierarchical Tables

Structured tables are essential for conveying high-density information in professional domains such as finance, healthcare, and scientific research. Despite the progress in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), reasoning performance remains limited for complex tables with hierarchical layouts. In this paper, we identify a critical Perception Bottleneck through quantitative analysis. We find that as task complexity scales, the number of involved discrete visual regions increases disproportionately. This processing density leads to an internal "Perceptual Overload," where MLLMs struggle to maintain accurate spatial attention during implicit generation. To address this bottleneck, we introduce TableVision, a large-scale, trajectory-aware benchmark designed for spatially grounded reasoning. TableVision stratifies tabular tasks into three cognitive levels (Perception, Reasoning, and Analysis) across 13 sub-categories. By utilizing a rendering-based deterministic grounding pipeline, the dataset explicitly couples multi-step logical deductions with pixel-perfect spatial ground truths, comprising 6,799 high-fidelity reasoning trajectories. Our empirical results, supported by diagnostic probing, demonstrate that explicit spatial constraints significantly recover the reasoning potential of MLLMs. Furthermore, our two-stage decoupled framework achieves a robust 12.3% overall accuracy improvement on the test set. TableVision provides a rigorous testbed and a fresh perspective on the synergy between perception and logic in document understanding.

Xiaoyu Chen, Lu Dai, Hanqing Wang +6

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · The Chinese University of Hong Kong +1

Table ReasoningSpatial Reasoning BenchmarksVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
Apr 2, 2026

Beyond Referring Expressions: Scenario Comprehension Visual Grounding

Existing visual grounding benchmarks primarily evaluate alignment between image regions and literal referring expressions, where models can often succeed by matching a prominent named category. We explore a complementary and more challenging setting of scenario-based visual grounding, where the target must be inferred from roles, intentions, and relational context rather than explicit naming. We introduce Referring Scenario Comprehension (RSC), a benchmark designed for this setting. The queries in this benchmark are paragraph-length texts that describe object roles, user goals, and contextual cues, including deliberate references to distractor objects that often require deep understanding to resolve. Each instance is annotated with interpretable difficulty tags for uniqueness, clutter, size, overlap, and position which expose distinct failure modes and support fine-grained analysis. RSC contains approximately 31k training examples, 4k in-domain test examples, and a 3k out-of-distribution split with unseen object categories. We further propose ScenGround, a curriculum reasoning method serving as a reference point for this setting, combining supervised warm-starting with difficulty-aware reinforcement learning. Experiments show that scenario-based queries expose systematic failures in current models that standard benchmarks do not reveal, and that curriculum training improves performance on challenging slices and transfers to standard benchmarks.

Ruozhen He, Nisarg A. Shah, Qihua Dong +3

Rice University · Johns Hopkins University · Northeastern University

Vision-Language GroundingVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 30, 2026

AMIGO: Agentic Multi-Image Grounding Oracle Benchmark

Agentic vision-language models increasingly act through extended interactions, but most evaluations still focus on single-image, single-turn correctness. We introduce AMIGO (Agentic Multi-Image Grounding Oracle Benchmark), a long-horizon benchmark for hidden-target identification over galleries of visually similar images. In AMIGO, the oracle privately selects a target image, and the model must recover it by asking a sequence of attribute-focused Yes/No questions under a strict protocol that returns Yes/No/Unsure feedback and penalizes invalid actions with Skip. This setting stresses (i) question selection under uncertainty, (ii) consistent constraint tracking across turns, and (iii) fine-grained discrimination as evidence accumulates. We instantiate AMIGO with the Guess My Preferred Dress task and evaluate open-source VLMs with metrics covering identification success, evidence verification, efficiency, protocol compliance, robustness to controlled feedback perturbations, and trajectory-level diagnostics. The benchmarking results show that final-answer accuracy alone overstates evidence-grounded performance: models can guess correctly without verification-passing evidence, waste turns through invalid questions, or fail to preserve the upload protocol. Strong AMIGO performance depends on the combination of visual discrimination, informative question selection, constraint tracking, efficient stopping, sustained protocol following, and recovery from controlled feedback noise; model scale alone does not guarantee reliable long-horizon interactive grounding.

Min Wang, Ata Mahjoubfar

Target Corporation

VLM EvaluationVisual Question AnsweringVision-Language GroundingAgentic ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningAgent Benchmarks+1
AskPDF
Mar 27, 2026

Beyond Where to Look: Trajectory-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal RLVR

Recent advances in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have mainly focused on improving final answer correctness and strengthening visual grounding. However, a critical bottleneck remains: although models can attend to relevant visual regions, they often fail to effectively incorporate visual evidence into subsequent reasoning, leading to reasoning chains that are weakly grounded in visual facts. To address this issue, we propose Trajectory-Guided Reinforcement Learning (TGRL), which guides the policy model to integrate visual evidence into fine-grained reasoning processes using expert reasoning trajectories from stronger models. We further introduce token-level reweighting and trajectory filtering to ensure stable and effective policy optimization. Extensive experiments on multiple multimodal reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that TGRL consistently improves reasoning performance and effectively bridges the gap between visual perception and logical reasoning.

Jinda Lu, Junkang Wu, Jinghan Li +6

University of Science and Technology of China · Pecking University · Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences

RL for VLMsMultimodal ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningReinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsLLM-Guided RL
AskPDF
Mar 25, 2026

Can VLMs Reason Robustly? A Neuro-Symbolic Investigation

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been applied to a wide range of reasoning tasks, yet it remains unclear whether they can reason robustly under distribution shifts. In this paper, we study covariate shifts in which the perceptual input distribution changes while the underlying prediction rules do not. To investigate this question, we consider visual deductive reasoning tasks, where a model is required to answer a query given an image and logical rules defined over the object concepts in the image. Empirically, we find that VLMs fine-tuned through gradient-based end-to-end training can achieve high in-distribution accuracy but fail to generalize under such shifts, suggesting that fine-tuning does not reliably induce the underlying reasoning function. This motivates a neuro-symbolic perspective that decouples perception from reasoning. However, we further observe that recent neuro-symbolic approaches that rely on black-box components for reasoning can still exhibit inconsistent robustness across tasks. To address this issue, we propose VLC, a neuro-symbolic method that combines VLM-based concept recognition with circuit-based symbolic reasoning. In particular, task rules are compiled into a symbolic program, specifically a circuit, which executes the rules exactly over the object concepts recognized by the VLM. Experiments on three simple visual deductive reasoning tasks with distinct rule sets show that VLC consistently achieves higher task accuracy on out-of-distribution data than other reasoning paradigms. Code is available at https://github.com/uiuctml/VLC.

Weixin Chen, Antonio Vergari, Han Zhao

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · University of Edinburgh

VLM RobustnessVisual ReasoningOOD GeneralizationVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningNeuro-Symbolic Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 21, 2026

Beyond Static Visual Tokens: Structured Sequential Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

Current multimodal LLMs encode images as static visual prefixes and rely on text-based reasoning, lacking goal-driven and adaptive visual access. Inspired by human visual perception-where attention is selectively and sequentially shifted from the most informative regions to secondary cues-we propose Structural Sequential Visual CoT SSV-CoT. First, a question-relevant saliency map identifies and organizes key visual regions, explicitly modeling the spatial distribution of visual importance. Second, reasoning is performed following this discriminative order, inducing a curriculum-like semantic progression from primary to secondary cues. This method is trained end-to-end, using text cot and answer supervision, without relying on region-level annotations or specialized external tools. Experiments on diverse visual reasoning benchmarks show gains, validating structured and sequential visual cognition.

Guangfu Guo, Xiaoqian Lu, Yue Feng +1

Beijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Applications · University of Bristol · University of Birmingham

VLM ReasoningMultimodal CoT ReasoningVisual CoTVisually Grounded ReasoningVisual Attention
AskPDF
Mar 17, 2026

Grounding the Score: Explicit Visual Premise Verification for Reliable Vision-Language Process Reward Models

Vision-language process reward models (VL-PRMs) are increasingly used to score intermediate reasoning steps and rerank candidates under test-time scaling. However, they often function as black-box judges: a low step score may reflect a genuine reasoning mistake or simply the verifier's misperception of the image. This entanglement between perception and reasoning leads to systematic false positives (rewarding hallucinated visual premises) and false negatives (penalizing correct grounded statements), undermining both reranking and error localization. We introduce Explicit Visual Premise Verification (EVPV), a lightweight verification interface that conditions step scoring on the reliability of the visual premises a step depends on. The policy is prompted to produce a step-wise visual checklist that makes required visual facts explicit, while a constraint extractor independently derives structured visual constraints from the input image. EVPV matches checklist claims against these constraints to compute a scalar visual reliability signal, and calibrates PRM step rewards via reliability gating: rewards for visually dependent steps are attenuated when reliability is low and preserved when reliability is high. This decouples perceptual uncertainty from logical evaluation without per-step tool calls. Experiments on VisualProcessBench and six multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that EVPV improves step-level verification and consistently boosts Best-of-N reranking accuracy over strong baselines. Furthermore, injecting controlled corruption into the extracted constraints produces monotonic performance degradation, providing causal evidence that the gains arise from constraint fidelity and explicit premise verification rather than incidental prompt effects. Code is available at: https://github.com/Qwen-Applications/EVPV-PRM

Junxin Wang, Dai Guan, Weijie Qiu +7

Qwen Large Model Application Team, Alibaba · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

Process Reward ModelsVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

Visual Set Program Synthesizer

A user pointing their phone at a supermarket shelf and asking "Which soda has the least sugar?" poses a difficult challenge for current visual Al assistants. Such queries require not only object recognition, but explicit set-based reasoning such as filtering, comparison, and aggregation. Standard endto-end MLLMs often fail at these tasks because they lack an explicit mechanism for compositional logic. We propose treating visual reasoning as Visual Program Synthesis, where the model first generates a symbolic program that is executed by a separate engine grounded in visual scenes. We also introduce Set-VQA, a new benchmark designed specifically for evaluating set-based visual reasoning. Experiments show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on complex reasoning tasks, producing more systematic and transparent behavior while substantially improving answer accuracy. These results demonstrate that program-driven reasoning provides a principled alternative to black-box visual-language inference.

Zehua Cheng, Wei Dai, Wenhu Zhang +2

Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Institute of Logic and Computation, TU Wien

Visual Program SynthesisVisual ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningVisual Question Answering
AskPDF
Mar 16, 2026

AsgardBench -- Evaluating Visually Grounded Interactive Planning Under Minimal Feedback

With AsgardBench we aim to evaluate visually grounded, high-level action sequence generation and interactive planning, focusing specifically on plan adaptation during execution based on visual observations rather than navigation or low-level manipulation. In the landscape of embodied AI benchmarks, AsgardBench targets the capability category of interactive planning, which is more sophisticated than offline high-level planning as it requires agents to revise plans in response to environmental feedback, yet remains distinct from low-level execution. Unlike prior embodied AI benchmarks that conflate reasoning with navigation or provide rich corrective feedback that substitutes for perception, AsgardBench restricts agent input to images, action history, and lightweight success/failure signals, isolating interactive planning in a controlled simulator without low-level control noise. The benchmark contains 108 task instances spanning 12 task types, each systematically varied through object state, placement, and scene configuration. These controlled variations create conditional branches in which a single instruction can require different action sequences depending on what the agent observes, emphasizing conditional branching and plan repair during execution. Our evaluations of leading vision language models show that performance drops sharply without visual input, revealing weaknesses in visual grounding and state tracking that ultimately undermine interactive planning. Our benchmark zeroes in on a narrower question: can a model actually use what it sees to adapt a plan when things do not go as expected?

Andrea Tupini, Lars Liden, Reuben Tan +2

Microsoft Research

AI Agent BenchmarksLLM Agent PlanningRobot Task PlanningVLMs for RoboticsVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 14, 2026

Improving Visual Reasoning with Iterative Evidence Refinement

Vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly capable of reasoning over images, but robust visual reasoning often requires re-grounding intermediate steps in the underlying visual evidence. Recent approaches typically rely on external image operations such as zooming or cropping to re-access fine-grained details during inference, which requires additional image re-encoding and can disrupt the reasoning trajectory. We argue that VLMs already provide strong internal signals for identifying and reusing visual evidence, and that these signals can be directly leveraged to support image-grounded reasoning. Motivated by this insight, we propose an end-to-end self-revisit framework, SIEVE, that trains models to re-engage image evidence through internal representations. SIEVE automatically extracts embeddings of salient image regions and injects them into the reasoning chain when additional grounding is needed, enabling later steps to condition on relevant visual cues without external tool calls or re-encoding. We use reinforcement learning to teach the model when to trigger visual revisiting and which region embeddings to retrieve and insert during the reasoning process. Experiments on multiple visual reasoning benchmarks, together with perception, reasoning, and hallucination evaluations, show that SIEVE yields consistent gains, improving performance by 8 percent on average across several benchmarks.

Zeru Shi, Kai Mei, Yihao Quan +2

Department of Computer Science Rutgers University

VLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 12, 2026

MM-CondChain: A Programmatically Verified Benchmark for Visually Grounded Deep Compositional Reasoning

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to carry out visual workflows such as navigating GUIs, where the next step depends on verified visual compositional conditions (e.g., "if a permission dialog appears and the color of the interface is green, click Allow") and the process may branch or terminate early. Yet this capability remains under-evaluated: existing benchmarks focus on shallow-compositions or independent-constraints rather than deeply chained compositional conditionals. In this paper, we introduce MM-CondChain, a benchmark for visually grounded deep compositional reasoning. Each benchmark instance is organized as a multi-layer reasoning chain, where every layer contains a non-trivial compositional condition grounded in visual evidence and built from multiple objects, attributes, or relations. To answer correctly, an MLLM must perceive the image in detail, reason over multiple visual elements at each step, and follow the resulting execution path to the final outcome. To scalably construct such workflow-style data, we propose an agentic synthesis pipeline: a Planner orchestrates layer-by-layer generation of compositional conditions, while a Verifiable Programmatic Intermediate Representation (VPIR) ensures each layer's condition is mechanically verifiable. A Composer then assembles these verified layers into complete instructions. Using this pipeline, we construct benchmarks across three visual domains: natural images, data charts, and GUI trajectories. Experiments on a range of MLLMs show that even the strongest model attains only 53.33 Path F1, with sharp drops on hard negatives and as depth or predicate complexity grows, confirming that deep compositional reasoning remains a fundamental challenge.

Haozhan Shen, Shilin Yan, Hongwei Xue +5

Accio Team, Alibaba Group · Zhejiang University · ZJU-BJ

Visually Grounded ReasoningVLM EvaluationVisual ReasoningMultimodal Large Language ModelsLogical Reasoning
AskPDF
Mar 12, 2026

VisDoT : Enhancing Visual Reasoning through Human-Like Interpretation Grounding and Decomposition of Thought

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) struggle to reliably detect visual primitives in charts and align them with semantic representations, which severely limits their performance on complex visual reasoning. This lack of perceptual grounding constitutes a major bottleneck for chart-based reasoning. We propose VisDoT, a framework that enhances visual reasoning through human-like interpretation grounding. We formalize four perceptual tasks based on the theory of graphical perception, including position and length. Building on this foundation, we introduce Decomposition-of-Thought (DoT) prompting, which sequentially separates questions into visual perception sub-questions and logic sub-questions. Fine-tuning InternVL with VisDoT achieves a +11.2% improvement on ChartQA and surpasses GPT-4o on the more challenging ChartQAPro benchmark. On the newly introduced VisDoTQA benchmark, the model improves by +33.2%. Furthermore, consistent zero-shot gains on diverse open-domain VQA benchmarks confirm the generalizability of the perception-logic separation strategy for visual question answering. VisDoT leverages human-like perception to enhance visual grounding, achieving state-of-the-art chart understanding and interpretable visual reasoning.

Eunsoo Lee, Jeongwoo Lee, Minki Hong +2

Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Dongguk University · Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University

VLM ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningChart QAQuestion Decomposition
AskPDF
Mar 11, 2026

CodePercept: Code-Grounded Visual STEM Perception for MLLMs

When MLLMs fail at Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) visual reasoning, a fundamental question arises: is it due to perceptual deficiencies or reasoning limitations? Through systematic scaling analysis that independently scales perception and reasoning components, we uncover a critical insight: scaling perception consistently outperforms scaling reasoning. This reveals perception as the true lever limiting current STEM visual reasoning. Motivated by this insight, our work focuses on systematically enhancing the perception capabilities of MLLMs by establishing code as a powerful perceptual medium--executable code provides precise semantics that naturally align with the structured nature of STEM visuals. Specifically, we construct ICC-1M, a large-scale dataset comprising 1M Image-Caption-Code triplets that materializes this code-as-perception paradigm through two complementary approaches: (1) Code-Grounded Caption Generation treats executable code as ground truth for image captions, eliminating the hallucinations inherent in existing knowledge distillation methods; (2) STEM Image-to-Code Translation prompts models to generate reconstruction code, mitigating the ambiguity of natural language for perception enhancement. To validate this paradigm, we further introduce STEM2Code-Eval, a novel benchmark that directly evaluates visual perception in STEM domains. Unlike existing work relying on problem-solving accuracy as a proxy that only measures problem-relevant understanding, our benchmark requires comprehensive visual comprehension through executable code generation for image reconstruction, providing deterministic and verifiable assessment. Code is available at https://github.com/TongkunGuan/Qwen-CodePercept.

Tongkun Guan, Zhibo Yang, Jianqiang Wan +10

MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, School of Computer Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Qwen Team · Beijing Institute of Technology +2

Image-to-Code GenerationVisually Grounded ReasoningFine-Grained Visual PerceptionVLM EvaluationCode Generation
AskPDF
Mar 9, 2026

M3^3-ACE: Rectifying Visual Perception in Multimodal Math Reasoning via Multi-Agentic Context Engineering

Multimodal large language models have recently shown promising progress in visual mathematical reasoning. However, their performance is often limited by a critical yet underexplored bottleneck: inaccurate visual perception. Through systematic analysis, we find that the most failures originate from incorrect or incomplete visual evidence extraction rather than deficiencies in reasoning capability. Moreover, models tend to remain overly confident in their initial perceptions, making standard strategies such as prompt engineering, multi-round self-reflection, or posterior guidance insufficient to reliably correct errors. To address this limitation, we propose M3-ACE, a multi-agentic context engineering framework designed to rectify visual perception in multimodal math reasoning. Instead of directly aggregating final answers, our approach decouples perception and reasoning by dynamically maintaining a shared context centered on visual evidence lists. Multiple agents collaboratively contribute complementary observations, enabling the system to expose inconsistencies and recover missing perceptual information. To support stable multi-turn collaboration, we further introduce two lightweight tools: a Summary Tool that organizes evidence from different agents into consistent, complementary, and conflicting components, and a Refine Tool that filters unreliable samples and guides iterative correction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that M3-ACE substantially improves visual mathematical reasoning performance across multiple benchmarks. Our method establishes new state-of-the-art results 89.1 on the MathVision benchmark and achieves consistent improvements on other related datasets, including MathVista and MathVerse. These results highlight the importance of perception-centric multi-agent collaboration for advancing multimodal reasoning systems.

Peijin Xie, Zhen Xu, Bingquan Liu +1

Platform and Content Group Tencent

Multimodal ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningMulti-Agent Systems
AskPDF
Mar 4, 2026

DeepScan: A Training-Free Framework for Visually Grounded Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models

Humans can robustly localize visual evidence and provide grounded answers even in noisy environments by identifying critical cues and then relating them to the full context in a bottom-up manner. Inspired by this, we propose DeepScan, a training-free framework that combines Hierarchical Scanning, Refocusing, and Evidence-Enhanced Reasoning for visually grounded reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Unlike existing methods that pursue one-shot localization of complete evidence, Hierarchical Scanning performs local cue exploration and multi-scale evidence extraction to recover evidence in a bottom-up manner, effectively mitigating the impacts of distractive context. Refocusing then optimizes the localized evidence view through collaboration of LVLMs and visual experts. Finally, Evidence-Enhanced Reasoning aggregates multi-granular views via a hybrid evidence memory and yields accurate and interpretable answers. Experimental results demonstrate that DeepScan significantly boosts LVLMs in diverse visual tasks, especially in fine-grained visual understanding. It achieves 90.6% overall accuracy on V* when integrated with Qwen2.5-VL-7B. Moreover, DeepScan provides consistent improvements for LVLMs across various architectures and model scales without additional adaptation cost.

Yangfu Li, Hongjian Zhan, Jiawei Chen +3

East China Normal University · Sichuan University · Shanghai AI Laboratory

VLM ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningLarge Vision-Language Models
AskPDF
Mar 4, 2026

Seeing as Experts Do: A Knowledge-Augmented Agent for Open-Set Fine-Grained Visual Understanding

Fine-grained visual understanding is shifting from static classification to knowledge-augmented reasoning, where models must justify as well as recognise. Existing approaches remain limited by closed-set taxonomies and single-label prediction, leading to significant degradation under open-set or context-dependent conditions. We present the Knowledge-Augmented Fine-Grained Reasoning Agent (KFRA), a unified framework that transforms fine-grained perception into evidence-driven reasoning. KFRA operates through a three-stage closed reasoning loop that emulates expert analysis. It first performs open-vocabulary detection and web-scale retrieval to generate category hypotheses. It then conducts discriminative regions localisation by aligning textual knowledge with visual evidence through a global-to-local focusing mechanism. Finally, it integrates all multimodal evidence within a large multimodal model to perform interpretable reasoning. Unlike existing agents that treat retrieval and reasoning as independent processes, KFRA establishes a retrieval-grounding coupling that converts retrieved knowledge into spatially grounded evidence for verification. This design enables factual, interpretable, and task-agnostic reasoning across diverse fine-grained scenarios. To evaluate this capability, we construct FGExpertBench, a benchmark designed to assess reasoning depth and cross-task generalisation across six knowledge dimensions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that KFRA consistently surpasses both standalone large multimodal models and current agent frameworks, achieving up to 19 percent improvement in reasoning accuracy and delivering evidence-grounded interpretability in open-set fine-grained visual understanding.

Junhan Chen, Zilu Zhou, Yujun Tong +3

School of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, China

Fine-Grained Visual PerceptionVisually Grounded ReasoningOpen-Set Recognition
AskPDF
Mar 1, 2026

How RL Unlocks the Aha Moment in Geometric Interleaved Reasoning

Solving complex geometric problems inherently requires interleaved reasoning: a tight alternation between constructing diagrams and performing logical deductions. Although recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in visual generation and plotting, we identify a counter-intuitive and underexplored phenomenon. Naively applying Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on interleaved plot-solution data leads to a substantial degradation in reasoning performance compared to text-only baselines. We argue that this failure stems from a fundamental limitation of SFT, which primarily induces distributional alignment: the model learns to reproduce the surface format of interleaved plotting but fails to internalize the causal dependency between the generated plot and reasoning steps. To overcome this limitation, we propose Faire (Functional alignment for interleaved reasoning), a reinforcement learning framework that enforces three casual constraints to move beyond superficial imitation toward functional alignment. Extensive experiments show that Faire induces a qualitative shift in model behavior in which the plotting is effectively internalized, yielding competitive performance on challenging geometric reasoning benchmarks.

Xiangxiang Zhang, Caijun Jia, Siyuan Li +9

ByteDance · Shenyang Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Chinese Academy of Science +2

Visually Grounded ReasoningRL for Language Model ReasoningMathematical ReasoningMultimodal CoT Reasoning
AskPDF
Feb 28, 2026

PaLMR: Towards Faithful Visual Reasoning via Multimodal Process Alignment

Reinforcement learning has recently improved the reasoning ability of Large Language Models and Multimodal LLMs, yet prevailing reward designs emphasise final-answer correctness and consequently tolerate process hallucinations--cases where models reach the right answer while misperceiving visual evidence. We address this process-level misalignment with PaLMR, a framework that aligns not only outcomes but also the reasoning process itself. PaLMR comprises two complementary components: a perception-aligned data layer that constructs process-aware reasoning data with structured pseudo-ground-truths and verifiable visual facts, and a process-aligned optimisation layer that constructs a hierarchical reward fusion scheme with a process-aware scoring function to encourage visually faithful chains-of-thought and improve training stability. Experiments on Qwen2.5-VL-7B show that our approach substantially reduces reasoning hallucinations and improves visual reasoning fidelity, achieving state-of-the-art results on HallusionBench while maintaining strong performance on MMMU, MathVista, and MathVerse. These findings indicate that PaLMR offers a principled and practical route to process-aligned multimodal reasoning, advancing the reliability and interpretability of MLLMs.

Yantao Li, Qiang Hui, Chenyang Yan +8

National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University · Data Science & Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, China Unicom · Unicom Data Intelligence, China Unicom

Multimodal ReasoningFaithfulness in VLMsVisually Grounded ReasoningVLM Hallucination MitigationRL for VLMsProcess Supervision
AskPDF
Feb 27, 2026

Thinking with Images as Continuous Actions: Numerical Visual Chain-of-Thought

Recent MLLMs increasingly rely on visual chain-of-thought to perform region-grounded reasoning over images. However, existing approaches ground regions via either textified coordinates (causing modality mismatch and semantic fragmentation) or fixed-granularity patches that both limit precise region selection and often require non-trivial architectural changes. In this paper, we propose Numerical Visual Chain-of-Thought (NV-CoT), a framework that enables MLLMs to reason over images using continuous numerical coordinates. NV-CoT expands the MLLM action space from discrete vocabulary tokens to a continuous Euclidean space, allowing models to directly generate bounding-box coordinates as actions with only minimal architectural modification. The framework supports both supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning. In particular, we replace categorical token policies with a Gaussian (or Laplace) policy over coordinates and introduce stochasticity via reparameterized sampling, making NV-CoT fully compatible with GRPO-style policy optimization. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks against 11 representative visual reasoning baselines demonstrate that NV-CoT significantly improves localization precision and final answer accuracy, while also accelerating training convergence, validating the effectiveness of continuous-action visual reasoning in MLLMs. Project page: https://kesenzhao.github.io/NV-CoT/

Kesen Zhao, Beier Zhu, Junbao Zhou +3

Nanyang Technological University · Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg · University of Science and Technology of China

Multimodal CoT ReasoningVisual CoTVisually Grounded ReasoningVision-Language-Action Models
AskPDF
Feb 27, 2026

VisRef: Visual Refocusing while Thinking Improves Test-Time Scaling in Multi-Modal Large Reasoning Models

Advances in large reasoning models have shown strong performance on complex reasoning tasks by scaling test-time compute through extended reasoning. However, recent studies observe that in vision-dependent tasks, extended textual reasoning at inference time can degrade performance as models progressively lose attention to visual tokens and increasingly rely on textual priors alone. To address this, prior works use reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning to route visual tokens or employ refocusing mechanisms during reasoning. While effective, these methods are computationally expensive, requiring large-scale data generation and policy optimization. To leverage the benefits of test-time compute without additional RL fine-tuning, we propose VisRef, a visually grounded test-time scaling framework. Our key idea is to actively guide the reasoning process by re-injecting a coreset of visual tokens that are semantically relevant to the reasoning context while remaining diverse and globally representative of the image, enabling more grounded multi-modal reasoning. Experiments on three visual reasoning benchmarks with state-of-the-art multi-modal large reasoning models demonstrate that, under fixed test-time compute budgets, VisRef consistently outperforms existing test-time scaling approaches by up to 6.4%.

Soumya Suvra Ghosal, Youngeun Kim, Zhuowei Li +6

University of Maryland, College Park · Amazon · Physion Labs

Test-Time Scaling for VLMsMultimodal ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Feb 27, 2026

Ref-Adv: Exploring MLLM Visual Reasoning in Referring Expression Tasks

Referring Expression Comprehension (REC) links language to region level visual perception. Standard benchmarks (RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, RefCOCOg) have progressed rapidly with multimodal LLMs but remain weak tests of visual reasoning and grounding: (i) many expressions are very short, leaving little reasoning demand; (ii) images often contain few distractors, making the target easy to find; and (iii) redundant descriptors enable shortcut solutions that bypass genuine text understanding and visual reasoning. We introduce Ref-Adv, a modern REC benchmark that suppresses shortcuts by pairing linguistically nontrivial expressions with only the information necessary to uniquely identify the target. The dataset contains referring expressions on real images, curated with hard distractors and annotated with reasoning facets including negation. We conduct comprehensive ablations (word order perturbations and descriptor deletion sufficiency) to show that solving Ref-Adv requires reasoning beyond simple cues, and we evaluate a broad suite of contemporary multimodal LLMs on Ref-Adv. Despite strong results on RefCOCO, RefCOCO+, and RefCOCOg, models drop markedly on Ref-Adv, revealing reliance on shortcuts and gaps in visual reasoning and grounding. We provide an in depth failure analysis and aim for Ref-Adv to guide future work on visual reasoning and grounding in MLLMs.

Qihua Dong, Kuo Yang, Lin Ju +6

Northeastern University

Referring Expression ComprehensionVLM EvaluationVision-Language GroundingVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Feb 25, 2026

GeoChallenge: A Multi-Answer Multiple-Choice Benchmark for Geometric Reasoning with Diagrams

Evaluating the symbolic reasoning of large language models (LLMs) calls for geometry benchmarks that require multi-step proofs grounded in both text and diagrams. However, existing benchmarks are often limited in scale and rarely provide visually grounded multiple-choice questions, limiting reliable evaluation of complex reasoning. We introduce GeoChallenge, a dataset of 90K automatically generated multiple-choice geometry proof problems, each requiring multi-step reasoning over aligned textual descriptions and diagrams. GeoChallenge provides fine-grained complexity ratings and formal language annotations to enable controlled evaluation. Experiments on multiple advanced LLMs show a clear performance gap between models and humans (the best-performing model, GPT-5-nano, achieves 75.89 exact match vs. 94.74 for humans). Further analysis also reveals three common failure patterns of LLMs: (1) exact match failures under the multiple-choice setting; (2) weak visual reliance; and (3) overextended reasoning without convergence.

Yushun Zhang, Weiping Fu, Zesheng Yang +6

School of Computer Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China · Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Big Data Knowledge Engineering, Xi’an, China

Mathematical Reasoning BenchmarksLLM Mathematical ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Feb 25, 2026

When More Is Less: A Systematic Analysis of Spatial and Commonsense Information for Visual Spatial Reasoning

Visual spatial reasoning (VSR) remains challenging for modern vision-language models (VLMs), despite advances in multimodal architectures. A common strategy is to inject additional information at inference time, such as explicit spatial cues, external commonsense knowledge, or chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning instructions. However, it remains unclear when such information genuinely improves reasoning and when it introduces noise. In this paper, we conduct a hypothesis-driven analysis of information injection for VSR across three representative VLMs and two public benchmarks. We examine (i) the type and number of spatial contexts, (ii) the amount and relevance of injected commonsense knowledge, and (iii) the interaction between spatial grounding and CoT prompting. Our results reveal a consistent pattern: more information does not necessarily yield better reasoning. Targeted single spatial cues outperform multi-context aggregation, excessive or weakly relevant commonsense knowledge degrades performance, and CoT prompting improves accuracy only when spatial grounding is sufficiently precise. These findings highlight the importance of selective, task-aligned information injection and provide practical guidance for designing reliable multimodal reasoning pipelines.

Muku Akasaka, Soyeon Caren Han

The University of Melbourne Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Visual Spatial ReasoningVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Feb 23, 2026

A Very Big Video Reasoning Suite

Rapid progress in video models has largely focused on visual quality, leaving their reasoning capabilities underexplored. Video reasoning grounds intelligence in spatiotemporally consistent visual environments that go beyond what text can naturally capture, enabling intuitive reasoning over spatiotemporal structure such as continuity, interaction, and causality. However, systematically studying video reasoning and its scaling behavior is hindered by the lack of large-scale training data. To address this gap, we introduce the Very Big Video Reasoning (VBVR) Dataset, an unprecedentedly large-scale resource spanning 200 curated reasoning tasks following a principled taxonomy and over one million video clips, approximately three orders of magnitude larger than existing datasets. We further present VBVR-Bench, a verifiable evaluation framework that moves beyond model-based judging by incorporating rule-based, human-aligned scorers, enabling reproducible and interpretable diagnosis of video reasoning capabilities. Leveraging the VBVR suite, we conduct one of the first large-scale scaling studies of video reasoning and observe early signs of emergent generalization to unseen reasoning tasks. Together, VBVR lays a foundation for the next stage of research in generalizable video reasoning. The data, benchmark toolkit, and models are publicly available at https://video-reason.com/?v=vbvr .

Maijunxian Wang, Ruisi Wang, Juyi Lin +53

Reasoning EvaluationVideo ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningScaling Laws
AskPDF
Feb 21, 2026

Bridging Modality Disconnect in Self-Reflection via Closed-Loop Visually Grounded Verification

In the era of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), enhancing multimodal reasoning capabilities remains a critical challenge, particularly in handling ambiguous or complex visual inputs, where initial inferences often lead to hallucinations or logic errors. Existing VLMs often produce plausible yet ungrounded answers, and even when prompted to "reflect", their corrections may remain detached from the image evidence. To address this, we propose the MIRROR framework for Multimodal Iterative Reasoning via Reflection On visual Regions. By embedding visual reflection as a core mechanism, MIRROR is formulated as a closed-loop process comprising draft, critique, region-based verification, and revision, which are repeated until the output is visually grounded. To facilitate training of this model, we construct ReflectV, a visual reflective dataset for multi-turn supervision that explicitly contains reflection triggers, region-based verification actions, and answer revision grounded in visual evidence. Experiments on both general vision-language benchmarks and representative vision-language reasoning benchmarks show that MIRROR improves correctness and reduces visual hallucinations, demonstrating the value of training reflection as an evidence-seeking, region-aware verification process rather than a purely textual revision step.

Haoyu Zhang, Yuwei Wu, Pengxiang Li +6

Beijing Institute of Technology · Shenzhen MSU-BIT University

Self-Correction in VLMsVision-Language ModelsVLM Hallucination MitigationVisually Grounded ReasoningModality Gap in VLMs
AskPDF
Feb 19, 2026

OpenEarthAgent: A Unified Framework for Tool-Augmented Geospatial Agents

Recent progress in multimodal reasoning has enabled agents that interpret imagery, connect it with language, and execute structured analytical tasks. Extending these capabilities to remote sensing remains challenging, as models must reason over spatial scale, geographic structures, and multispectral indices while maintaining coherent multi-step logic. To address this gap, we introduce OpenEarthAgent, a unified framework for tool-augmented geospatial reasoning trained on satellite imagery, natural-language queries, and structured reasoning traces. Beyond serving as a benchmark, OpenEarthAgent establishes a cohesive agentic architecture built around a unified executable tool registry and trajectory-based policy learning. The framework standardizes heterogeneous visual, spectral, GIS, and georeferenced raster operations under a consistent callable schema, enabling modular orchestration and deterministic execution. Training is performed via supervised fine-tuning on structured reasoning trajectories with deterministic replay validation to ensure executability and spatial correctness. The accompanying corpus comprises 14,538 training and 1,169 evaluation instances with over 107K reasoning steps, spanning urban, environmental, disaster, and infrastructure domains and incorporating GIS operations alongside index analyses such as NDVI, NBR, and NDBI. Grounded in explicit reasoning traces, the learned agent demonstrates structured reasoning, stable spatial understanding, and interpretable tool-driven behaviour across diverse EO scenarios. We report consistent improvements over a strong baseline and competitive performance against recent open and closed-source models. Our code, data and trained models are publicly available: https://github.com/mbzuai-oryx/OpenEarthAgent

Akashah Shabbir, Muhammad Umer Sheikh, Muhammad Akhtar Munir +8

Mohamed bin Zayed University of AI, United Arab Emirates · IBM Research, Europe · Linköping University, Sweden +2

Geospatial Reasoning BenchmarksRemote SensingGeospatial ReasoningTool-Using Vision-Language AgentsVisually Grounded ReasoningSpatial Reasoning
AskPDF
Feb 6, 2026

SPARC: Separating Perception And Reasoning Circuits for Test-time Scaling of VLMs

Despite recent successes, test-time scaling -- i.e., dynamically expanding the token budget during inference as needed -- remains brittle for vision-language models (VLMs). Unstructured visual reasoning chains entangle perception and reasoning, leading to long, disorganized contexts where small perceptual mistakes may cascade into completely wrong answers. Reasoning also requires expensive reinforcement learning with hand-crafted rewards. Here, we introduce SPARC (Separating Perception And Reasoning Circuits), a modular framework that explicitly decouples visual perception from reasoning. Inspired by sequential sensory-to-cognitive processing in the brain, SPARC implements a two-stage pipeline where the model first performs explicit visual search to localize question-relevant regions, then conditions its reasoning on those regions to produce the final answer. This separation enables independent test-time scaling with asymmetric compute allocation (e.g., prioritizing perceptual processing under distribution shift), and supports selective optimization (e.g., improving the perceptual stage alone when it is the bottleneck for end-to-end performance). It also accommodates compressed contexts by running global search at lower image resolutions and allocating high-resolution processing only to selected regions, thereby reducing visual token count and compute. SPARC outperforms monolithic baselines and strong visual-grounding approaches across challenging visual reasoning tasks, such as improving Qwen3VL 4B on the V∗V^* VQA benchmark by 6.7 points and surpassing "thinking with images" by 4.6 points in an OOD setting with a 200×200\times lower token budget.

Niccolo Avogaro, Nayanika Debnath, Li Mi +6

ETH Zürich · IBM Research · MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab.

Visual Question AnsweringEfficient VLM InferenceTest-Time Scaling for VLMsLarge Vision-Language ModelsVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning+1
AskPDF
Feb 2, 2026

ClueTracer: Question-to-Vision Clue Tracing for Training-Free Hallucination Suppression in Multimodal Reasoning

Large multimodal reasoning models solve challenging visual problems via explicit long-chain inference: they gather visual clues from images and decode clues into textual tokens. Yet this capability also increases hallucinations, where the model generates content that is not supported by the input image or the question. To understand this failure mode, we identify reasoning drift: during clue gathering, the model over-focuses on question-irrelevant entities, diluting focus on task-relevant cues and gradually decoupling the reasoning trace from visual grounding. As a consequence, many inference-time localization or intervention methods developed for non-reasoning models fail to pinpoint the true clues in reasoning settings. Motivated by these insights, we introduce ClueRecall, a metric for assessing visual clue retrieval, and present ClueTracer, a training-free, parameter-free, and architecture-agnostic plugin for hallucination suppression. ClueTracer starts from the question and traces how key clues propagate along the model's reasoning pathway (question →\rightarrow outputs →\rightarrow visual tokens), thereby localizing task-relevant patches while suppressing spurious attention to irrelevant regions. Remarkably, without any additional training, ClueTracer improves all reasoning architectures (including R1-OneVision, Ocean-R1, MM-Eureka, etc.) by 1.21×\mathbf{1.21\times} on reasoning benchmarks

Gongli Xi, Kun Wang, Zeming Gao +5

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China · Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital, SCU

VLM Hallucination MitigationMLLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Jan 25, 2026

R3G: A Reasoning-Retrieval-Reranking Framework for Vision-Centric Answer Generation

Vision-centric retrieval for VQA requires retrieving images to supply missing visual cues and integrating them into the reasoning process. However, selecting the right images and integrating them effectively into the model's reasoning remains challenging. To address this challenge, we propose R3G, a modular Reasoning-Retrieval-Reranking framework. It first produces a brief reasoning plan that specifies the required visual cues, then adopts a two-stage strategy, with coarse retrieval followed by fine-grained reranking, to select evidence images. On MRAG-Bench, R3G improves accuracy across six MLLM backbones and nine sub-scenarios, achieving state-of-the-art overall performance. Ablations show that sufficiency-aware reranking and reasoning steps are complementary, helping the model both choose the right images and use them well. We release code and data at https://github.com/czh24/R3G.

Zhuohong Chen, Zhengxian Wu, Zirui Liao +6

1The Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, China · School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, China · 2State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Technology and Equipment, China

Multimodal RAGVisual Question AnsweringLarge Vision-Language ModelsVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningVision-Language Retrieval+1
AskPDF
Jan 19, 2026

SplatReasoner: Enhancing Embodied Reasoning and Grounding by Novel View Synthesis

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities over images and videos, yet their application to embodied scene understanding often constrained by the fixed viewpoints stored in episodic RGB-D memories. These observations may fail to capture query-relevant evidence due to occlusions, object truncation, restricted fields of view, or suboptimal view composition. We present SplatReasoner, a framework that introduces novel view synthesis into the VLM reasoning process by leveraging 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS). Given a user query about a 3D scene, SplatReasoner retrieves relevant observations and synthesizes query-conditioned viewpoints that reveal the visual evidence needed to answer the query and ground the referred entities in 3D. Experiments show that query-conditioned novel view synthesis improves both embodied reasoning and 3D grounding over fixed-view memory and language-embedded 3DGS baselines.

Kim Yu-Ji, Dahye Lee, Kim Jun-Seong +6

POSTECH · KAIST · ETRI +1

VLM ReasoningVisually Grounded ReasoningEmbodied Reasoning3D Scene Understanding3D Visual Grounding
AskPDF