VLM Reasoning

Chart question-answering (QA) benchmarks aim to pose questions that require visual reasoning to correctly answer, but models can often reach solutions through shortcuts or prior familiarity with a chart based on their own background knowledge. To strictly evaluate visual reasoning, we propose counterfactual charts where the chart-question task remains fixed, but underlying chart and the corresponding answer are varied. We introduce Chartographer, a framework to reverse engineer charts into executable code, validate reconstruction fidelity, generate seed-controlled counterfactual variants, and derive new answers from executable QA logic. We apply this framework to existing chart QA datasets and evaluate proprietary and open-source vision-language models (VLMs), measuring variation sensitivity and generalizability. Counterfactual charts reveal failures hidden by single-chart performance: VLMs often fail to generalize after answering the original chart correctly. We find failures are most prevalent when updated charts require novel visual reasoning pathways.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown rapid progress in mobile GUI navigation. This paper presents a systematic study of data scaling, benchmarking, and reasoning for VLM-based agents in this domain. To facilitate rigorous evaluation, we introduce HyperTrack, a large-scale dataset with over 16000 real-world tasks across more than 650 Chinese mobile applications, along with GUIEvalKit, an open-source toolkit for unified benchmarking of VLMs on offline GUI navigation tasks. Using HyperTrack, we analyze the effects of training data scale on both supervised and reinforcement-based finetuning. Our results show that reinforcement-based finetuning consistently outperforms supervised finetuning, particularly in out-of-domain settings, highlighting the synergy between data scaling and reinforcement learning. Leveraging GUIEvalKit, we further benchmark state-of-the-art (SOTA) VLMs and analyze how interaction history and reasoning capabilities influence task completion. Together, HyperTrack and GUIEvalKit provide a comprehensive platform for developing and evaluating VLM agents in mobile GUI navigation tasks.

While vision-language models (VLMs) have exhibited multi-turn visual reasoning capabilities, their reasoning trajectories remain relatively shallow and are dominated by a text-centric paradigm, limiting their applicability to complex visual challenges. In contrast, human-like thought typically involves long-horizon reasoning with an interleaved visual-textual chain-of-thought (VT-CoT). To bridge this gap, we introduce InterSketch, an interleaved reasoning model to enhance the VT-CoT capability via self-correcting and stepwise reward mechanisms. InterSketch dynamically generates intermediate visual sketches using external tools and interleaves them with textual reasoning, enabling effective perception and logical reasoning over long-horizon visual understanding tasks. Specifically, in the first cold-start stage, we propose a synthesized high-quality interleaved VT-CoT dataset and include a reflection mechanism to enable the model's capability in multi-turn interleaved reasoning and self-correction. In the subsequent reinforcement learning (RL) stage, we design a stepwise reward mechanism to mitigate the sparsity of reward signals inherent in end-only supervision over long-horizon reasoning. Extensive experiments on visual reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of InterSketch, even outperforming proprietary models such as Gemini-3-Pro.

Understanding human gaze behavior is essential for complex scene comprehension and human-computer interaction. Traditional gaze following models are typically restricted to pure spatial localization, lacking the high-level capacity to reason about semantic targets or complex social contexts. Furthermore, these models often process individuals sequentially, requiring redundant computations over the same scene image for multi-person inference. While recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer the exceptional semantic reasoning needed to address gaze-related semantic tasks, their reliance on discrete text generation inherently limits precision in continuous spatial tasks like gaze localization. To bridge this gap, we propose OmniGF, a unified vision-language framework that adapts foundational VLMs for highly scalable multi-person gaze reasoning. The model adopts a dual-branch decoding strategy: a structured language branch generates discrete reasoning states, while a continuous spatial branch directly taps into the VLM's dense hidden states. Supervising these extracted representations with high-resolution gaze target heatmaps effectively overcomes the spatial bottleneck of text-only coordinate generation. Furthermore, to explicitly ground the model in multi-person scenes, we augment the input with head embeddings encoded from cropped head images, providing fine-grained appearance and orientation cues for all individuals simultaneously. By modeling all individuals and leveraging the strong semantic capability of VLMs, OmniGF seamlessly integrates precise spatial gaze target estimation, semantic gaze prediction, and complex social gaze reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework establishes new state-of-the-art performance across multiple standard benchmarks. Code is available at https://github.com/cvlab-stonybrook/omnigf.

Lightweight vision-language models perform competitively on standard benchmarks yet fail systematically in dense-scene reasoning, where multiple objects, attributes, and relations must be jointly grounded and resolved through multi-step inference. Such capability is critical for real-world applications where models must reliably interpret cluttered environments. Yet existing training signals provide no explicit grounding between reasoning steps and the underlying visual entities and relations, leaving lightweight models free to generate fluent but visually unanchored reasoning chains. To address this gap, we first introduce DRBench, a benchmark of 14,573 questions across 2,943 images, organized into five task categories spanning three progressive reasoning layers. Building on DRBench, we propose DRScaffold, a supervised fine-tuning framework that decomposes the supervision target into four causally ordered stages, enforcing grounded reasoning without architectural modification. Experiments on three lightweight VLMs demonstrate substantial gains on DRBench while preserving or improving performance on general-purpose benchmarks. Notably, Qwen2.5-VL-3B trained with DRScaffold surpasses the frozen Qwen2.5-VL-32B on DRBench, demonstrating that structured supervision can substitute for a significant portion of model scale in dense-scene reasoning. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/irene-shi/DRScaffold .

Charts play a critical role in conveying numerical data insights through structured visual representations. However, semantic visual understanding and numerical reasoning requirements hinder the accurate description of charts, interpreting a challenging task in chart summarization. Despite recent advancements in visual language models (VLMs), approaches lack robust mechanisms for verifying statistical fact correctness and are computationally heavy. To address this gap, this paper explores a strategy of using zero-shot learning to motivate the lightweight VLMs to perform computational reasoning, via Python programs as intermediaries to derive valid summary statistics for chart understanding. Specifically, we introduce a novel chart-to-dictionary auxiliary task, offering a more flexible representation compared to traditional chart-to-table methods, making it particularly well-suited for integration with the Program-of-Thought (PoT) strategy. Experimental results demonstrate our strategy performs on par with existing chart summarization methods across semantic and factual metrics. Code is available on https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ZeroShot-PoT-C2T-5A6B.

Embodied Question Answering (EQA) connects perception, reasoning, and interaction within embodied environments. However, existing datasets and benchmarks remain fragmented, each focusing on a limited subset of reasoning skills such as spatial understanding or procedural reasoning, without offering a unified large-scale framework for comprehensive evaluation. We present EQA-Decision, a large-scale embodied QA dataset that systematically covers four complementary dimensions of embodied reasoning: static scene construction, spatial understanding, task dynamics reasoning, and instant decision. The dataset contains over four million question-answer pairs with hierarchical annotations across diverse embodied scenarios. In addition, we develop RoboDecision, a strong baseline model aligned with the EQA-Decision Benchmark, providing a unified framework that jointly evaluates perception, reasoning, and action-level decision-making in embodied environments. Results demonstrate that EQA-Decision effectively benchmarks and enhances VLM capabilities in spatial and interaction reasoning, providing a solid foundation for advancing embodied intelligence research.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have advanced rapidly in remote-sensing analysis, yet existing evaluations remain predominantly 2D-centric. Because spectrally confused regions can appear nearly identical yet differ substantially in vertical structure, appearance alone is often insufficient for reliable semantic interpretation in natural scenes. Vertical structure therefore provides decision-critical physical evidence, yet whether current MLLMs can effectively perceive, ground, and utilize such geometric evidence remains underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce VertiCue-Bench, the first diagnostic benchmark that uses controlled interventions to probe whether vertical height evidence is actually perceived, grounded, and utilized, and we establish a three-stage evidence-utilization framework of Perception--Grounding--Utilization. By constructing a Representation Intervention Spectrum spanning multiple presentation and interaction modalities, including Raw Visual, Tool-assisted, and Oracle Text conditions, together with controlled counterfactual tests, we conduct an in-depth disentangled diagnosis across 10 state-of-the-art models. Our experiments reveal and formally characterize the Vertical Structure Utilization Gap. Although current models exhibit emerging geometric perception capabilities, they still struggle to accurately ground vertical evidence to relevant spatial entities and integrate it into high-level semantic decisions. This finding identifies a critical bottleneck in developing physically grounded and geometry-aware remote-sensing MLLMs.

Reliable spatial reasoning remains a core bottleneck for vision-language models (VLMs). Existing mainstream training paradigms for spatial reasoning largely rely on outcome alignment or process imitation, lacking explicit constraints on the reasoning process, and therefore struggle to ensure genuine visual dependence and stable reasoning trajectories. In this paper, we construct a high-quality CoT dataset covering diverse spatial phenomena and diagnose the model's reasoning process, revealing two typical types of process degradation during reinforcement learning optimization: Spurious Grounding, which bypasses visual evidence, and Tail Instability, where uncertainty abnormally rises in the later stage of reasoning. To address these issues, we propose ProSR, a process-shaping optimization framework for spatial reasoning. Through a Counterfactual Invariance Penalty and a Tail Drift Penalty, ProSR extends the optimization objective from single answer correctness to two process-level dimensions: visual dependence and trajectory stability. Experiments on multiple complex and out-of-distribution spatial reasoning benchmarks show that ProSR improves answer accuracy while generating reasoning trajectories that are more stable and more dependent on visual evidence.

Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear to what extent such performance reflects reasoning directly grounded in visual evidence. We introduce VisReason, a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning in everyday scenarios where perception and inference are tightly coupled. VisReason contains 1,505 questions across 10 categories spanning perceptual, structural, and conceptual reasoning. Our evaluation shows that VisReason poses a qualitatively different challenge from existing benchmarks, exposing substantial gaps between humans and current MLLMs and revealing limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. VisReason offers a focused diagnostic for evaluating vision-centric reasoning beyond language.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capability of vision-language models (VLMs). However, RL-based optimization typically depends on costly high-quality annotations that are difficult to scale. Existing unsupervised alternatives may drift toward biased solutions due to weak visual grounding and the lack of reliable verification signals. We propose a self-evolving post-training framework, DUEL, where supervision emerges from adversarial interactions between two policies initialized from the same pretrained VLM. A Challenger generates an image-grounded true claim together with a minimally perturbed hard-negative counterpart, while a Solver verifies both claims against the image, encouraging fine-grained visual discrimination under near-neighbor semantics. To stabilize optimization, we introduce a length-normalized log-likelihood reward that preserves informative optimization signals beyond binary outcome supervision and improves learning stability under sparse feedback. Experiments show that DUEL consistently improves visual reasoning and robust discrimination without additional human annotations, external reward models, or image editing tools.

We present IQA-Spider, the first image quality assessment (IQA) framework that unifies reasoning, grounding, and referring into a single LMM-based framework for multi-granularity quality understanding. Existing LMM-based IQA methods typically support only partial perception dimensions, such as quality description and question answering~(\textit{i.e.}, reasoning) or pixel-level grounding. This limitation largely stems from the absence of (i) a unified task and data formulation and (ii) effective optimization paradigms for multi-granularity learning. To address these limitations, we formulate a rigorous four-task paradigm covering global and local quality description, pixel-level grounding, and region-level referring. Based on this formulation, we construct a corresponding IQA dataset with a scalable and automatic annotation pipeline, thereby providing a solid foundation for unified multi-granularity learning. To further enable unified perception, we adopt a conflict-free two-stage design that progressively extends text-level multi-granularity understanding to pixel-level grounding: (i) the first stage equips the model with fine-grained text-level reasoning across multiple IQA tasks, and (ii) the second stage introduces a training-free text-to-point grounding paradigm, which bridges textual semantics and pixel-level perception by mapping token logits to spatial coordinates. Based on these efforts, we achieve IQA-Spider with unified multi-granularity explainable image quality assessment. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate strong performance, validating the effectiveness and versatility of the proposed formulation and framework.

Vision-language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in general medical visual question answering, yet due to limited interpretability, it remains unclear whether their predictions reflect evidence-grounded clinical reasoning or reliance on spurious priors. We introduce Med-R2 Bench, a hierarchical benchmark aligned with the clinical workflow to evaluate adversarial robustness with visual grounding. We design stepwise QA tasks to assess whether reasoning chains are strictly grounded in visual evidence across the four clinical stages, and employ adversarial perturbations to test robustness against misleading cues. Med-R2 comprises 42,432 images, 31 task categories, and 110,406 QA pairs. Evaluation across 14 VLMs reveals a sequential performance degradation along the four-stage clinical workflow. Adversarial experiments show that models rely heavily on correct prompts to guess answers. Even when provided with explicit visual cues, the models struggle to accurately align textual descriptions. Finally, we demonstrate stepwise fine-tuning using our hierarchical data significantly improves reasoning robustness, highlighting its potential to drive future improvements in evidence-based medical AI.

Single-vehicle Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are fundamentally constrained by sensor occlusions. While Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) systems mitigate this, current benchmarks lack the cooperative reasoning required for resolving ambiguities in complex environments. We introduce D2-V2X, a spatially-aware Question-Rationale-Answer (QRA) benchmark featuring 8,500 triplets derived from multimodal vehicle and infrastructure sensors. We additionally establish a baseline that aligns 3D LiDAR features with the VLM's latent space. By enforcing natural language Chain-of-Thought rationales prior to structured JSON outputs, our model is forced to explicitly articulate spatial relations. Our experiments demonstrate that grounding VLMs in cooperative LiDAR achieves 24.4% recall in identifying occluded hazards compared to near-zero in zero-shot models and reduces spatial estimation error for visible objects by 77% compared to the zero-shot baseline. While the model achieves a functional decision-making F1-score of 53.5, we identify 3D-to-2D projection as a fundamental bottleneck in current VLM architectures, establishing a new baseline for future innovation. Data, code, and trained models available at https://github.com/KevinRichard1/D2-V2X

Spatiotemporal intelligence in autonomous driving (AD) requires an agent to integrate multi-view observations into a coherent scene representation, maintain object continuity across viewpoints and time, and reason about spatial relations, interactions, and future dynamics. However, existing AD vision-language benchmarks largely focus on single-view, static, ego-centric, or single-source question answering, leaving it unclear whether current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can truly construct and reason over dynamic driving scenes. We introduce DriveSpatial, a benchmark of 15.6K human-verified QA pairs across 20 tasks from five large-scale AD datasets. DriveSpatial evaluates four abilities: Cognitive Scene Construction, Multi-view Relational Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Generalization. Unlike prior benchmarks, DriveSpatial is generated from a dynamic multi-relational scene graph that encodes object states, spatial relations, interactions, camera visibility, and temporal correspondences, enabling QA pairs that enforce genuine cross-view and spatiotemporal reasoning. Evaluating 15 representative VLMs reveals a substantial human-model gap: the strongest model trails humans by 28.4 points, with Cognitive Scene Construction emerging as the key bottleneck. Further diagnostics show that language-only prompting is insufficient, while explicit BEV grounding consistently improves performance. These results suggest that current VLMs lack the scene-construction ability needed for reliable spatiotemporal driving intelligence. DriveSpatial and its construction pipeline will be released to support future research.

Existing Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) methods typically rely on task-specific training, leading to strong domain dependency and high training costs. Moreover, most existing methods output only scalar anomaly scores, providing limited insight into why specific events are considered abnormal. Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have enabled both anomaly detection and human-interpretable reasoning. However, many VLM-based approaches still require additional training steps (e.g., instruction tuning or verbalized learning) or external Large Language Models (LLMs), incurring further training costs and inference overhead. To address these challenges, we propose CoReVAD, a contextual reasoning framework for training-free video anomaly detection that operates with a single frozen VLM. CoReVAD directly generates anomaly scores and temporal descriptions from the VLM. To mitigate noise in generative outputs, we introduce a Local Response Cleaning (LRC) module based on local vision-text alignment. Furthermore, global temporal context and progression are incorporated through softmax-based refinement, Gaussian smoothing, and position weighting. Experiments on UCF-Crime and XD-Violence demonstrate that CoReVAD achieves competitive performance among training-free methods while providing reliable and interpretable explanations. Our official code is available at: https://github.com/Muk-00/CoReVAD

Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires an agent to ground language instructions to its own movement within a visual environment. While state-of-the-art methods leverage the reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for end-to-end action prediction, they often lack an explicit and explainable understanding of the relationships between the agent, the instruction, and the scene. Conversely, explicitly building a scene map for heuristic planning is intuitively appealing but relies on additional 3D sensors and hinders large-scale vision-language pre-training. To bridge this gap, we propose AwareVLN, a novel framework that equips the navigation model with a self-aware reasoning mechanism, enabling it to understand the agent's state and task progress in a fully end-to-end and data-driven manner. Our approach features two key innovations: (1) a structural reasoning module that fosters spatial and task-oriented self-awareness, and (2) an automatic data engine with progress division for effective training. Extensive experiments on various datasets in Habitat simulator show our AwareVLN significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art vision-language navigation methods. Project page: https://gwxuan.github.io/AwareVLN/.

Spatio-temporal reasoning in vision-language models requires visual representations that preserve physical geometry rather than merely semantic appearance. Recent multimodal models incorporate geometric information through structural branches, 3D-aware supervision, reasoning-stage fusion, or long-horizon memory. While these approaches demonstrate the importance of geometry for spatial intelligence, they typically treat geometric cues as a shared signal across all visual tokens. We note that this overlooks a finer-grained challenge: different visual tokens require different geometric evidence depending on their spatial roles. To address this limitation, we introduce GeoWeaver, a pre-reasoning geometric grounding framework that treats geometry as a representational prerequisite for spatio-temporal reasoning. GeoWeaver constructs a multi-level geometry bank from a frozen geometry encoder and performs token-adaptive geometric evidence allocation, enabling each visual token to retrieve the most relevant geometric abstractions. The selected evidence is incorporated into visual tokens via a residual grounding operation prior to language modeling, yielding geometry-grounded representations for downstream reasoning. Extensive evaluations on spatial reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that GeoWeaver consistently enhances geometry-aware reasoning while retaining general multimodal capabilities. This indicates that geometric information yields the greatest benefit not as a late-fusion auxiliary signal but as a fundamental prerequisite that shapes the representational foundation on which large language models perform reasoning. All source code and models will be released at https://github.com/yahooo-m/GeoWeaver .

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) represent a significant leap towards empathetic agents, demonstrating remarkable capabilities in emotion understanding. However, the internal mechanisms governing how LVLMs translate abstract visual stimuli into coherent emotional narratives remain largely unexplored, primarily due to the scarcity of visual counterfactuals and the diffuse nature of emotional expression. In this paper, we bridge this gap by introducing a steering-vector-based causal attribution framework tailored for descriptive emotional reasoning. To this end, we construct a specialized dataset to demystify the emotional circuits underlying the three-stage ``Adapt-Aggregate-Execute'' mechanism. Crucially, we discover a functional decoupling: visual emotional cues are aggregated in middle layers via sentiment-specific attention heads, but are subsequently translated into narrative generation in deep layers through emotion-general pathways. Guided by these insights, we regulate the emotional information routing to strengthen attention flow and amplify the semantic activation to consolidate expression. Extensive experiments on the comprehensive MER-UniBench demonstrate that our methods significantly improve performance via inference-time intervention, effectively mitigating emotional hallucinations and corroborating the causal fidelity of the discovered circuits.

Current Video-LLM approaches for Video Temporal Grounding (VTG) typically rely on direct timestamp generation from an unstructured visual-token stream, often leading to brittle numerics and inconsistent boundaries. To address this, we propose Foresee-to-Ground (F2G), a framework that reformulates VTG as a verifiable Identify-then-Measure problem. F2G integrates Predictive Temporal Perception with Evidence-Driven Reasoning: it learns boundary-sensitive temporal representations to build a video-wide evidence pool of candidate event segments, and exposes these segments to the LLM as citable evidence units that bind boundary prediction to explicit event hypotheses. By decoupling event identification from precise boundary measurement, F2G stabilizes grounding and makes predictions verifiable. Extensive experiments demonstrate that F2G consistently improves grounding accuracy across diverse benchmarks, transfers robustly across different Video-LLM backbones, and preserves general video understanding capabilities.

On-policy knowledge distillation has proven effective for language models, yet its application to vision-language models (VLMs) remains underexplored. We observe that standard on-policy distillation can improve a student's output quality while failing to strengthen its reliance on visual input: on vision-critical tokens, the student's predictions remain largely unchanged whether or not fine-grained visual detail is present, even though the teacher's predictions depend heavily on it.To make this difference observable, we introduce visual advantage (VA), the token-level log-probability difference when the teacher scores a student-generated rollout with versus without access to fine-grained visual detail. VA is concentrated in a small minority of tokens, and these high-VA tokens are the ones that actually carry the visual supervision signal. This motivates a distillation objective that treats them differently from language scaffolding, so their contribution is not diluted by the abundant surrounding language tokens.We propose Visual-Advantage On-Policy Distillation (VA-OPD), which uses VA at two granularities: rollout-level reweighting by trajectory-averaged VA, and token-level KL averaged within high-VA and low-VA groups separately. We train on two math datasets (Geometry3K and ViRL39K) and evaluate on eight benchmarks covering both mathematical reasoning and visual understanding, across three teacher sizes (4B, 8B, and 32B) on the Qwen3-VL family. VA-OPD improves over standard on-policy distillation on every benchmark, with the gain growing monotonically along both the teacher-size and data-scale axes, suggesting that these factors compound consistently.

Assessing progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires multi-step reasoning over visual cues, contextual knowledge, and development indicators, where incomplete evidence use and imperfect evidence integration can introduce hidden prediction biases. Real-world SDG monitoring further spans both qualitative judgments and quantitative estimation. However, existing benchmarks typically evaluate these aspects in isolation, obscuring systematic biases that emerge when models substitute priors for evidence. To address this gap, we propose SDGBiasBench, a large-scale benchmark suite for SDG-oriented vision-language reasoning. Spanning 500k expert-involved multiple-choice questions and 50k regression tasks, the benchmark enables comprehensive assessment of both decision-level and estimation-level bias in Vision--Language Models (VLMs). Evaluations on SDGBiasBench reveal an intrinsic SDG bias in current VLMs, where predictions are frequently driven by SDG specific priors rather than reliable multi-modal cues. To mitigate such bias, we propose CADE (Contrastive Adaptive Debias Ensemble), a training-free, plug-and-play method that leverages modality-specific answer priors. CADE yields significant gains on the proposed benchmark, improving multiple-choice accuracy by up to 25% and reducing regression MAE by up to 12 points across multiple VLMs. We hope our work can foster the development of more fair and reliable AI systems for sustainable development.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly augmented with continuous or latent non-textual tokens intended to support "visual thinking." Despite improved task accuracy, this alone does not show that models actually use these tokens for reasoning -- gains may arise from confounds such as added context length, special-token anchoring, or training-time regularization. We formalize a diagnostic principle, Ablate-to-Validate, for testing whether latent-token content is genuinely utilized, and instantiate it as the Token Replacement Test (TRT), a standardized suite of content-replacement ablations. TRT holds the prompt, image, token budget, and decoding fixed while replacing intermediate tokens with zero, random, first-repeat, or oracle alternatives, isolating whether performance depends on token content or merely on token presence. As a controlled testbed, we study relative depth reasoning with LLaVA-13B and Qwen2.5-VL-3B, training models to predict and consume continuous or discrete depth spans across multiple frozen encoders (SigLIP2, CLIP, DINOv2) and token budgets. We additionally apply TRT to three off-the-shelf visual-thinking systems (Mirage, Mull-Tokens, CoVT) on BLINK, VSP, and CV-Bench. Across all settings, accuracy gains are a misleading proxy for latent-token reasoning: VLMs retain most improvement even when token content is corrupted or replaced, revealing a persistent gap between having a latent channel and using it as an information bottleneck. We recommend TRT as a standard diagnostic alongside accuracy for any method introducing continuous thought tokens.

Interpretable autonomous driving planners depend not only on generating explanations, but also on those explanations remaining reliable under real-world sensor degradation. In this paper we present a controlled perturbation study of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) robustness in autonomous driving, evaluating Alpamayo R1 (10B parameters) across 1,996 scenarios under eight sensor perturbations (Gaussian noise at four intensities, two lighting extremes, and two fog levels; ${\sim}18{,}000$ inference trials). We find that reasoning consistency is a high-fidelity indicator of trajectory reliability: when Chain-of-Causation (CoC) explanations change after perturbation, trajectory deviation spikes $5.3{\times}$ (21.8m vs 4.1m), with $r\!=\!0.99$ across attack types and $r_{pb}\!=\!0.53$ per-sample (Cohen's $d\!=\!1.12$). A controlled ablation provides evidence that enabling CoC generation is associated with improved trajectory accuracy (11.8% on average across conditions; $p < 0.0001$) under matched inference settings. Over the tested noise range ($σ\in \{10, 30, 50, 70\}$), degradation is approximately linear ($R^2\!=\!0.957$), while standard input preprocessing defenses provide only marginal relief. Together, these results establish CoC consistency as a quantitative proxy for planning safety and motivate reasoning-based runtime monitoring for safer VLA deployment.

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown promise for video quality assessment, but most methods still predict an absolute score for each video. Such pointwise supervision often mixes perceptual quality with dataset-specific calibration, including annotation protocols, rating habits, and score distributions. As a result, the learned scoring rule may work well within a benchmark but transfer poorly across unseen domains. We argue that relative comparisons alleviate the absolute-scale calibration bias by focusing purely on perceptual differences rather than dataset-specific rating habits. Consequently, we propose \textbf{VersusQ}, a pairwise margin reasoning framework driven entirely by direct comparisons. Specifically, VersusQ performs LMM-based comparison between two videos, reasons about their visual and temporal quality differences, and predicts a signed continuous margin that captures both the preferred choice and the degree of difference. Furthermore, to align interpretable comparison rationales with fine-grained numerical differences, we introduce Margin-Coupled GRPO, which jointly optimizes rollout-based relational reasoning and continuous margin regression. Extensive experiments on multiple public VQA benchmarks demonstrate that VersusQ achieves state-of-the-art performance, strong cross-domain generalization, and reliable fine-grained ranking under heterogeneous evaluation scenarios.

Structured road understanding of lane geometry, topology, and traffic element relationships is foundational to safe autonomous driving. While vision-language models (VLMs) offer promising semantic flexibility, they lack the geometric and relational grounding required for precise road reasoning. Conversely, traditional modular systems, e.g., HD maps and topological road graphs, provide structural precision but remain semantically rigid. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Combined Road Substrate (CRS), a graph-grounded framework that makes geometric road structure and open-vocabulary semantics jointly executable in a single representation. CRS enables the automatic generation of compositionally complex and linguistically varied question-answer pairs via recursive graph queries, augmented with a "grounding for free" mechanism that ensures logical traceability to specific map elements, and procedurally extracted chain-of-thought supervision traces. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art VLMs - including large, closed-source models - struggle significantly with structured road reasoning, yet training a small 2- or 4-billion-parameter model with as few as 20 to 80 CRS-enriched scenes yields stable gains in compositional reasoning tasks of varying depth. Analysis of model behavior via verifiable reasoning traces reveals a systematic shift in failure modes: whereas baseline models fail at relational scene understanding, CRS-trained models reduce failures to attribute recognition, suggesting that the primary bottleneck in road understanding is not model scale, but the absence of structured supervision.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved strong multimodal reasoning capabilities, but further improving them still relies heavily on large-scale human-constructed supervision for post-training. Such supervision is costly to obtain, especially for reasoning-intensive multimodal tasks where questions, answers, and feedback signals must be carefully designed. This motivates self-evolving learning, where a model improves itself through a dual-role closed loop: a questioner autonomously poses questions and a solver learns to solve them. However, we observe that current VLM self-evolving methods still face three major challenges: coarse-grained role alternation delays the interaction between question generation and solver adaptation; generated questions can progressively degrade in quality; and question types may collapse toward a narrow distribution. These issues limit the efficiency and reliability of self-evolution. Thus, we propose \textbf{RISE}, a reliable self-evolving framework for vision-language models. RISE is built on three complementary designs: fine-grained role alternation, which shortens the feedback loop between the questioner and the solver to improve efficiency; a quality supervisor, which improves question validity and pseudo-label reliability; and skill-aware dynamic balancing, which mitigates mode collapse and maintains broad skill coverage during evolution. Together, these components enable more reliable and effective self-evolution from unlabeled images. Experiments on two VLM backbones across seven benchmarks show that RISE consistently improves the base models, yielding broad and sustained gains. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/AMAP-ML/RISE.

Inferring rigid-body physical states and properties from monocular videos is a fundamental step toward physics-based perception and simulation. Existing approaches assume specific underlying physical systems, object types, and camera poses, making them unable to generalize to complex real-world settings. We introduce $Δ$YNAMICS, a vision-language framework that uses language as a unified representation of rigid-body dynamics. Instead of directly predicting parameters, $Δ$YNAMICS generates scene configurations in a structured text format for physics simulation. We enhance the model's generalization by integrating natural language motion reasoning and leveraging optical flow as a semantic-agnostic input. On the CLEVRER dataset, $Δ$YNAMICS achieves a segmentation IoU of 0.30, a 7x improvement over leading VLMs (InternVL3-8B, Qwen2.5-VL-7B and Claude-4-Sonnet). Additionally, test-time sampling and evolutionary search further boost performance by 27% and 120% in segmentation IoU, respectively. Finally, we demonstrate strong transfer to a new dataset of 235 real-world rigid-body videos, highlighting the potential of language-driven physics inference for bridging perception and simulation.

We study whether multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can leverage crystallographic plane indices (Miller indices) as a structured latent representation for reasoning about fracture geometry. We formulate Miller indices $z = (h,k,l)$ as a latent variable governing idealized planar fracture and evaluate two complementary capabilities: (i) latent inference, where the model maps visual observations to plane hypotheses under physically valid conditions, and (ii) latent applicability assessment, where the model determines whether such a representation is meaningful for a given fracture image. Through extensive experiments spanning synthetic data, controlled 2D--3D geometric pairs, and real-world fracture images across multiple material classes -- including ceramics, glass, metals, and concrete -- we show that MLLMs can reliably perform latent inference in idealized settings and, critically, can reject the latent representation when the underlying physics does not support it. As an exploratory extension, we further examine AI-generated fracture sequences and observe qualitatively plausible brittle-fracture progression behaviors, suggesting that multimodal generative models may encode partial implicit physical priors related to material failure dynamics. These results suggest that MLLMs can act as physics-aware reasoning systems conditioned on structured latent priors, provided that the domain of validity is explicitly modeled.

Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) emphasize long chain-of-thought reasoning; yet, we find that their performance on visual tasks is primarily limited by a lack of visual perception as opposed to reasoning itself. In this work, we systematically study the interplay between perception and reasoning in VLM post-training by decomposing their capabilities into three separate training stages: visual perception, visual reasoning, and textual reasoning, incorporating specialized training data. We demonstrate that visual perception (a) requires targeted optimization with specialized data; (b) serves as a fundamental scaffold that should be solidified through staged training before refining visual reasoning; and (c) is more effectively learned via RL than caption-based SFT. Our experiments across multiple VLMs demonstrate that staged training consistently improves both visual perception and reasoning performance over merged training. Notably, models trained with our approach achieve 1.5% higher reasoning accuracy with 20.8% shorter reasoning traces, suggesting that superior perception reduces the need for excessive reasoning. Furthermore, we show that this capability-based staging represents a new curriculum dimension orthogonal to traditional difficulty-based curricula, and combining both yields further additive gains. Our staged-training models achieve superior performance among open-weight VLMs, establishing advanced results on several visual math and perception (e.g., +5.2% on WeMath and +3.7% on RealWorldQA) tasks compared with the base counterpart.