Physiological World Models for Human State Transitions
Organizations: Fullive-AI. · Peking University.
Abstract
Continuous multimodal sensing now allows human physiology to be observed throughout daily life rather than only during occasional clinical visits. However, most health artificial intelligence systems are designed to recognize current states, estimate risks or analyse individual biomarkers. They do not directly model how physiological states change in response to real-world events, behaviours, contexts and interventions. Here we propose the Physiological World Model (PWM), an event-conditioned framework for learning these changes at the level of the whole person. We introduce the HumanState Transition Token, a structured, quality-scored unit that connects the physiological state before an event with the event or action, relevant context and intervention information, the physiological trajectory after the event, observed outcomes and data quality. We describe four capability levels, from state representation to bounded intervention planning, together with four data acquisition and validation protocols. We also propose six benchmark tasks covering HumanState representation, forecasting across multiple timescales, individualized response prediction, simulation of alternative interventions, bounded planning and reliability under distribution shift. Together, this framework provides a practical path towards personalized health management, behavioural intervention design and clinician-supervised decision support, while clearly separating prediction from causal inference and making uncertainty, safety, governance and limits of use explicit.
Figures & tables
| Task | Evaluation objective | Representative metrics | Capability and evidence requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1: HumanState Representation and Estimation | Determine whether the model constructs a physiologically meaningful and transferable HumanState representation | Agreement with validated physiological measures; cross-device and cross-population transfer; robustness to noise and missing modalities | L1; primarily P1 |
| T2: Multi-horizon State-Transition Forecasting | Predict how HumanState evolves across multiple timescales following a specified event, action, or intervention, conditional on the current HumanState and Context | Trajectory error; effective forecasting horizon; prediction-interval coverage; calibration | L2; primarily P2 |
| T3: Event-Conditioned and Individualized Response Prediction | Determine whether the model captures person-specific response patterns and heterogeneity following a given event, action, or intervention | Response direction; peak amplitude; time to peak; recovery rate; personalization gain | L2; P2–P3 |
| T4: Alternative Intervention Simulation | Compare plausible trajectories under alternative interventions | Held-out intervention error; intervention-ranking accuracy; cross-condition generalization error; uncertainty calibration | L3; primarily P3 |
| T5: Bounded Planning and Steerability | Rank intervention options under explicit objectives, costs, contraindications, and safety constraints | Prospective outcome improvement; intervention efficiency; ranking accuracy; safety violations | L4; P3–P4 |
| T6: Reliability under Distribution Shift | Determine whether the model recognizes when its predictions become unreliable | Robustness gap; calibration error; uncertainty–error association; abstention performance; subgroup failure analysis | Cross-cutting across L1–L4; P1–P4, with external or prospective evaluation under relevant distribution shifts |
| Application horizon | Representative applications | Required tasks | Capability level | Evidence and validation requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Near-term | Sleep and fatigue monitoring; exercise recovery forecasting; metabolic stability monitoring; stress-related recovery | T1, T2, T3 and T6 | Primarily L1–L2 | P1–P2 data; external validation; personalization tests; calibration and applicability boundaries |
| Mid-term | Meal- and caffeine-timing guidance; sleep scheduling; exercise planning; work–rest adjustment | T1–T4 and T6 | Primarily L2–L3 | P2–P3 data; repeated or N-of-1 observations; crossover interventions; intervention-ranking validation |
| Long-term | Chronic disease trajectories; adaptive rehabilitation planning; clinical-trial enrichment; bounded clinical decision support | T1–T6 | Primarily L3–L4 | P3–P4 evidence; prospective validation; safety gates; clinical oversight; regulatory and accountability requirements |
World Models
World models represent and predict how environments change, helping agents plan, act, and reason about possible futures.
See all 366 papers