Organizations: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA · Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
We study multi-agent terminal interception when one of several moving candidates is the unknown target and both target identity and candidate terminal locations are uncertain. We develop a receding-horizon deferred-decision trajectory optimization (DDTO) controller that combines conformal terminal-location prediction, sequential candidate rejection, capacity-constrained assignment, and candidate-contingent planning. Under exchangeability conditions for terminal and identity residuals, with predictable querying, we establish fixed-time terminal-location coverage and anytime-valid target retention. At the final replan, when one control step remains, we bound the joint probability that a tightened-set DDTO plan passes nonlinear rollout verification but capture fails. The closed-loop controller applies fallback guidance to any agent without a verified DDTO plan and, across 100 paired scenarios, captures 79% of targets under the strict control-effort budget and 85% when that budget is relaxed.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Closed-loop HoloOcean demonstration of multi-AUV terminal interception at replan k=12 . (a) HoloOcean state after executing the control applied at the preceding replan. (b) Corresponding planner state, initialized from simulator feedback, showing assignments, predicted terminal centers, conformal terminal regions, common DDTO prefixes, and candidate-contingent branches. (c) HoveringAUV model used for the agents. The target is highlighted in the figure but is not available to the controller.
Fig. 2: Statistical component validation over 1000 Monte Carlo trials. Terminal coverage, prediction error and conformal radius, and mean non-target rejection are reported. Shading gives pointwise 95% intervals.
Method
Capture (%) ↑
Team effort ( 103 N 2 s) ↓
Proposed DDTO
79.0%
214.9 [164.1, 274.5]
CMPC [ 9 ]
67.0%
233.4 [168.6, 281.8]
DDMP [ 10 ]
46.0%
257.3 [187.4, 300.0]
Fallback-only
6.0%
300.0 [300.0, 300.0]
Fallback-disabled
13.0%
46.6 [34.4, 65.6]
Center–commit
13.0%
217.2 [171.9, 300.0]
TABLE I: Closed-loop comparison at Ba=150×103 N 2 s over 100 paired scenarios. Effort is reported as median [IQR]. Bold denotes the highest observed capture rate.
Variant
Candidate rejection
Query rule
Assignment
Capture ↑
Effort ( 103 N 2 s) ↓
Complete verified-plan rate (%) ↑
Proposed DDTO
Yes
Balanced evidence
Reach cost
79.0%
214.9 [164.1, 274.5]
80.0 [80.0, 85.0]
No candidate rejection
No
Balanced evidence
Reach cost
68.0%
268.1 [234.1, 300.0]
80.0 [75.0, 80.0]
Uniform-random query
Yes
Uniform random
Reach cost
67.0%
172.7 [121.3, 229.6]
85.0 [80.0, 86.0]
Clustered assignment
Yes
Balanced evidence
Terminal clustering
63.0%
260.5 [209.2, 300.0]
80.0 [80.0, 85.0]
TABLE II: Component ablations at Ba=150×103 N 2 s over 100 paired scenarios. Effort and complete verified-plan rate are reported as median [IQR]. Bold denotes the highest observed capture rate.
Fig. 3: Planning diagnostics under the relaxed 250×103 N 2 s per-agent budget over 100 paired scenarios: (a) post-query retained-set size and (b) complete verified-plan rate for the compared controllers. Shading denotes pointwise 95% intervals.
Method
Capture (%) ↑
Team effort ( 103 N 2 s) ↓
Proposed DDTO
85.0%
271.3 [181.4, 339.3]
CMPC [ 9 ]
74.0%
253.2 [162.4, 357.4]
DDMP [ 10 ]
74.0%
334.7 [246.4, 428.1]
Fallback-only
28.0%
500.0 [477.5, 500.0]
Fallback-disabled
14.0%
46.8 [34.9, 67.0]
Center–commit
12.0%
288.2 [208.2, 380.6]
TABLE III: Closed-loop comparison after relaxing the per-agent effort budget to Ba=250×103 N 2 s over the same 100 paired scenarios. Effort is reported as median [IQR]. Bold denotes the highest observed capture rate.
We study trajectory optimization in mobile sensing systems that must identify which member of a finite candidate set is the true target, while maintaining reachability to all potential candidate targets, under resource constraints. Deferred-Decision Trajectory Optimization (DDTO) addresses this setting by computing trajectories that reach individual targets but remain coincident for as long as possible before separating toward different targets. We propose Active-Sensing DDTO (AS-DDTO), which extends DDTO by adding a trajectory-dependent information-acquisition term to the planning objective. The resulting planner maintains reachability to candidate targets while biasing the coincident portion of the trajectories toward regions that enable earlier target identification. The framework supports Bayesian updates and conformal candidate-set updates for distance-dependent sensing. We derive a mixed-integer conic reformulation and provide guarantees on recursive feasibility, belief concentration, and fixed-time coverage for the raw conformal candidate set. Numerical simulations show improved target identification compared with standard DDTO under distance-dependent sensing uncertainty and limited sensing budget.
Farbod Siahkali, Mengxue Hou, Vijay Gupta
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA · Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
Continuous aerial search builds target hypotheses from sparse, viewpoint-dependent observations. When later evidence contradicts a stored hypothesis, however, the candidate can remain available to the planner and continue triggering approach or verification actions. We call this trajectory-level failure false candidate persistence (FCP). We equip SkyAgent with Revisable Target Memory (RTM), which associates evidence with persistent candidates, discounts correlated views, and revises each candidate through Tentative, Confirmed, and Rejected states. The key interface binds every generated waypoint to its source candidate: rejection therefore invalidates stale goals, while conservative reactivation protects temporarily occluded targets. Across four splits from the CityAVOS, UAV-ON, and OpenUAV benchmarks, our SkyAgent equipped with RTM outperforms all competitors, improving SR by 2.90--6.31 points while substantially reducing Behavior-FCP and post-contradiction travel with a low false-rejection rate. Across 35 matched real-world DJI scenarios per method, RTM consistently improves task success and behavioral reliability, further validating its state-to-action correction under physical deployment conditions.
Kaibo Yang, Xingyu Wu, Enze Zhu +6
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Key Laboratory of Target Cognition and Application Technology (TCAT) · School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences +1
Simultaneously optimizing the trajectories of multiple agents is a challenging problem plagued by nonlinearity, nonconvexity, and the curse of dimensionality. A collection of interacting aerial vehicles or self-driving cars in an intersection are examples of complex multi-agent systems that remain difficult to solve without many simplifying assumptions. The presence of communication latency between agents further increases the difficulty. In this paper, we analyze Distributed Model-Based Diffusion: a sampling-based Model-Predictive Control method suitable for highly nonlinear, nonconvex, nonsmooth, multi-agent systems. We prove contraction and robustness to latency for multi-agent, nonconvex problems, showing applicability to real-world constraints. We test the algorithm on a circleswap task, a cooperative medium-fidelity driving task, and in an aerial combat scenario. Despite the addition of latency, our algorithm improves circleswap makespan by 31% and increases aerial combat win rate by 25% compared to centralized Model-Based Diffusion.
Seth Golembeski, Keith L. Gibson, Alexander Gross +2
School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA · Sandia National Laboratories · School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA