Language-first intelligence is constrained by which distinctions enter its symbolic record, which mappings its language--interpreter--environment complex can execute, and which possibilities can be realized with finite resources. We formalize these limits through an effective interface
φ, executable support
Πφ,H, a realization profile
M, and resource-indexed families
Fs(J,M). They induce four nested capability levels: current reachability, budget realizability, asymptotic realizability, and structural capability, each with literal and risk-equivalent forms. On finite task spaces, universal bounded-loss dominance is characterized by inclusion of closed convexified risk envelopes; directed deficiencies and resource transformations quantify approximate simulation and realization burden. The decomposition
Rs,J,M∗=RJ∗+Cs(J,M) separates structural limits from finite-resource compensation gaps. We develop dynamic control over these boundaries. Target risk identifies the lowest capability level that must change. Ockhamian control operates within inherited structural possibilities; Chattonian-containing control can produce endpoint structural novelty beyond the inherited decision class. Diminishing returns to within-structure computation and sustained structural-enrichment value yield a switching threshold, with switching costs creating hysteresis. Matched DeepSeek V4-Flash evidence shows: thinking raises pointer chasing from
0/16 to
14/16, exact observational and memory twins remain at their
0.5 floors, restoring decisive memory raises performance from
0.5 to
1.0, and executable support determines whether reasoning can become effective. The framework organizes LLM emergence limits through structural capability, finite realizability, boundary control, and recursive meta-control.