Large Language Model-Guided Optimization
Overview
This field studies how language models can use learned patterns and natural-language understanding to help search for better algorithms, programs, designs, prompts, and agent workflows. Common approaches combine model-generated proposals with evolutionary search, Bayesian optimization, reinforcement learning, or classical solvers, then use execution, simulator, or benchmark feedback to select and repair candidates. Applications range from combinatorial and scientific optimization to GPU kernels, compiler code, engineering design, and tuning language-model systems. A central open tension is that language models can suggest useful structures but may be unreliable, costly, or prone to overfitting, so robust evaluation, constraint checks, and comparisons with numerical methods remain essential.
Latest papers
613 papers101 papers in the last four weeks, up 60% on the four weeks before. 0.6% of all new papers.
Compiling Deterministic Structure into SLM Harnesses
LLM-Guided Strategy Synthesis for Scalable Equality Saturation
RosettaSearch: Multi-Objective Inference-Time Search for Protein Sequence Design
AdaExplore: Failure-Driven Adaptation and Diversity-Preserving Search for Efficient Kernel Generation
LLM as a Tool, Not an Agent: Code-Mined Tree Transformations for Neural Architecture Search
Bilevel Optimization of Agent Skills via Monte Carlo Tree Search
skills are structured collections of instructions, tools, and supporting resources that help large language model (LLM) agents perform particular classes of tasks. Empirical evidence shows that the design of skills can materially affect agent task performance, yet systematically optimizing skills remains challenging. Since a skill comprises instructions, tools, and supporting resources in a structured way, optimizing it requires jointly determining both the structure of these components and the content each component contains. This gives rise to a complex decision space with strong interdependence across structure and components. We therefore represent these two coupled decisions as skill structure and component content, and formulate skill optimization as a bilevel optimization problem. We propose a bilevel optimization framework in which an outer loop employs Monte Carlo Tree Search to determine the skill structure, while an inner loop refines the component content within the structure selected by the outer loop. In both loops, we employ LLMs to assist the optimization procedure. We evaluate the proposed framework on an open-source Operations Research Question Answering dataset, and the experimental results suggest that the bilevel optimization framework improves the performance of the agents with the optimized skill.