LLM Prompting

LLM: Large Language Model

Ask about this topic

Overview

The field studies how the wording and structure of inputs affect what language models understand, generate, and reliably follow. Common approaches include zero- and few-shot in-context learning, chain-of-thought and task decomposition, retrieval-augmented context, and structured prompts using schemas, roles, or constraints. Researchers also develop automated prompt search, feedback-driven refinement, and methods that adapt examples or context to each input, testing them on tasks such as reasoning, classification, code generation, and information extraction. Prompting can improve performance without changing model weights, but its effects vary across models and tasks: added instructions can hurt, and gains in accuracy may trade off with reliability, diversity, safety, or cost.

Latest papers

CardsList

431 papers34 papers in the last four weeks, down 13% on the four weeks before. 0.2% of all new papers.

Apr 14, 2026

Heuristic Classification of Thoughts Prompting (HCoT): Integrating Expert System Heuristics for Structured Reasoning into Large Language Models

This paper addresses two limitations of large language models (LLMs) in solving complex problems: (1) their reasoning processes exhibit Bayesian-like stochastic generation, where each token is sampled from a context-dependent probability distribution, leading to inherently random decision trajectories rather than deterministic planning; (2) the reasoning and decision-making mechanisms are statically decoupled, meaning dynamically retrieved domain knowledge fails to dynamically adjust the underlying reasoning strategy. These dual deficiencies result in initial decisions lacking strategic anchoring and reasoning chains often failing to converge on correct solutions, as stochastic generation lacks mechanisms for trajectory correction or knowledge-guided optimization during sequential reasoning. To resolve these issues, we propose a problem-solving method integrated into the LLM's generation process to guide reasoning. This method, compatible with numerous LLMs and featuring reusable solutions, is grounded in a novel Heuristic-Classification-of-Thoughts prompting schema (HCoT). HCoT synergizes the LLM's reasoning ability with a structured problem space via a heuristic classification model that controls the reasoning process and provides reusable abstract solutions. Evaluated on two complex inductive reasoning tasks with ill-defined search spaces, HCoT outperforms existing approaches (e.g., Tree-of-Thoughts and Chain-of-Thoughts prompting) in performance. On the well-structured 24 Game task, HCoT demonstrates significantly higher token efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art Tree-of-Thoughts-Breadth-First-Search. In terms of both accuracy and token usage, HCoT achieves a Pareto frontier balance, offering a strong trade-off between performance and computational cost.

Lei Lin, Jizhao Zhu, Yong Liu +3

Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · Shenyang Aerospace University · ZGC LAB, Beijing,China +1

Structured Reasoning in Language ModelsConstraint-Guided Reasoning in Language ModelsInductive Reasoning in Language ModelsLLM PromptingEfficient Language Model ReasoningLarge Reasoning Models
AskPDF
Apr 13, 2026

From Words to Widgets for Controllable LLM Generation

Natural language remains the predominant way people interact with large language models (LLMs). However, users often struggle to precisely express and control subjective preferences (e.g., tone, style, and emphasis) through prompting. We propose Malleable Prompting, a new interactive prompting technique for controllable LLM generation. It reifies preference expressions in natural language prompts into GUI widgets (e.g., sliders, dropdowns, and toggles) that users can directly configure to steer generation, while visualizing each control's influence on the output to support attribution and comparison across iterations. To enable this interaction, we introduce an LLM decoding algorithm that modulates the token probability distribution during generation based on preference expressions and their widget values. Through a user study, we show that Malleable Prompting helps participants achieve target preferences more precisely and is perceived as more controllable and transparent than natural language prompting alone.

Chao Zhang, Yiren Liu, Lunyiu Nie +3

Cornell University Ithaca, NY, USA · University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL, USA · The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX, USA +1

LLM PromptingControllable Text GenerationLanguage Model Steering
AskPDF
Apr 9, 2026

STaR-DRO: Stateful Tsallis Reweighting for Group-Robust Structured Prediction

Structured prediction with large language models requires outputs that are label-accurate, ontology-constrained, structurally valid, and evidence-grounded under label imbalance and heterogeneous group difficulty. We present a unified framework for ontology-constrained generation. First, we introduce a modular prompt-engineering architecture combining XML-style structure, expert disambiguation rules, chain-of-thought reasoning, metadata-aware decision logic, schema contracts, and a self-validation gate. It targets recurrent in-context failures, including format drift, label ambiguity, evidence hallucination, and metadata-conditioned confusion. Second, we propose STaR-DRO, combining Tsallis mirror ascent, sparse entmax-style primal mapback, EMA-smoothed group-loss tracking, rescaled ascent signals, and bounded excess-only multipliers. Unlike conventional DRO, which relies on dense Shannon-entropy exponentiated-gradient updates, can introduce high-variance stochastic reweighting, assigns positive adversarial mass to groups that are not persistently hard, and incurs costs through simplex competition, STaR-DRO upweights only persistently hard groups without suppressing easier ones. We evaluate the framework on EPPC Miner, a clinically grounded high-stakes structured-prediction task requiring hierarchical label prediction and evidence-span extraction from patient-provider secure messages. Across 1B-70B Llama models, prompt engineering improves zero-shot extraction, yielding an average label F1 gain of +14.46 and a Span F1 gain of +17.40. Building on supervised fine-tuning, STaR-DRO further improves accuracy and robustness, increasing average label F1 by +1.08 and +2.20 while reducing mean groupwise validation cross-entropy by 21.3% and 14.8% relative to SFT and standard DRO, respectively. These results advance reliable automated communication mining for patient-centered clinical care analysis.

Samah Fodeh, Ganesh Puthiaraju, Elyas Irankhah +5

Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. · Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Structured PredictionDistributionally Robust OptimizationLLM PromptingClinical Information ExtractionMedical LLMs
AskPDF
Apr 8, 2026

Dynamic Context Evolution for Scalable Synthetic Data Generation

Large language models produce repetitive output when prompted independently across many batches, a phenomenon we term cross-batch mode collapse: the progressive loss of output diversity when a language model is prompted repeatedly without access to its prior generations. Practitioners have long mitigated this with ad hoc deduplication and seed rotation, but no principled framework exists. We introduce Dynamic Context Evolution (DCE), comprising three mechanisms: (1) verbalized tail sampling (the model labels each idea with a guess about how obvious it is, and obvious ideas are discarded), which filters high-probability candidates via model self-assessment; (2) semantic memory, which maintains a persistent embedding index to reject near-duplicates across batches; and (3) adaptive prompt evolution, which reconstructs the generation prompt each batch using memory state and rotating diversity strategies. In experiments across three domains (sustainable packaging concepts, educational exam questions, and creative writing prompts) and two model families (gpt-5-mini and claude-haiku-4-5), a component ablation across 2-3 random seeds per method shows that DCE achieves 0.0 +/- 0.0% collapse versus 5.6 +/- 2.0% for naive prompting, while producing 17-18 HDBSCAN clusters per seed versus naive's volatile 2-17, indicating reliably richer conceptual structure. These results are validated with an independent embedding model (all-MiniLM-L6-v2) and hold across sensitivity sweeps of the VTS threshold tau and dedup threshold delta. Deduplication and prompt evolution are individually insufficient but jointly effective, at approximately $0.50 per 1,000 candidates using only standard API calls, with no fine-tuning or custom architectures required.

Ryan Lingo, Rajeev Chhajer

Honda Research Institute, USA, Inc.

Repetition in Language GenerationOutput Diversity in Language ModelsLLM PromptingSynthetic Data Generation for Language Models
AskPDF
Apr 8, 2026

Adaptive Prompt Structure Factorization: A Framework for Self-Discovering and Optimizing Compositional Prompt Programs

Automated prompt optimization is crucial for eliciting reliable reasoning from large language models (LLMs), yet most API-only prompt optimizers iteratively edit monolithic prompts, coupling components and obscuring credit assignment, limiting controllability, and wasting tokens. We propose Adaptive Prompt Structure Factorization (aPSF), an API-only framework (prompt-in/text-out; no access to model internals) that uses an Architect model to discover task-specific prompt structures as semantic factors. aPSF then performs interventional, single-factor updates: interventional factor-level scoring estimates each factor's marginal contribution via validation-performance changes, and error-guided factor selection routes updates to the current dominant failure source for more sample-efficient optimization. Across multiple advanced reasoning benchmarks, aPSF outperforms strong baselines including principle-aware optimizers, improving accuracy by up to +2.16 percentage points on average, and reduces optimization cost by 45--87% tokens on MultiArith while reaching peak validation in 1 step.

Haoyue Liu, Zhichao Wang, Yongxin Guo +2

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · Taobao and Tmall Group

LLM Input OptimizationLLM PromptingAutomatic Prompt OptimizationLarge Language Model-Guided Optimization
AskPDF
Apr 8, 2026

DiffuMask: Diffusion Language Model for Token-level Prompt Pruning

In-Context Learning and Chain-of-Thought prompting improve reasoning in large language models (LLMs). These typically come at the cost of longer, more expensive prompts that may contain redundant information. Prompt compression based on pruning offers a practical solution, yet existing methods rely on sequential token removal which is computationally intensive. We present DiffuMask, a diffusion-based framework integrating hierarchical shot-level and token-level pruning signals, that enables rapid and parallel prompt pruning via iterative mask prediction. DiffuMask substantially accelerates the compression process via masking multiple tokens in each denoising step. It offers tunable control over retained content, preserving essential reasoning context and achieving up to 80% prompt length reduction. Meanwhile, it maintains or improves accuracy across in-domain, out-of-domain, and cross-model settings. Our results show that DiffuMask provides a generalizable and controllable framework for prompt compression, facilitating faster and more reliable in-context reasoning in LLMs.

Caleb Zheng, Jyotika Singh, Fang Tu +6

University of Washington · Oracle AI

Prompt CompressionLLM Context CompressionLLM PromptingDiffusion Language Models
AskPDF
Apr 7, 2026

AICA-Bench: Holistically Examining the Capabilities of VLMs in Affective Image Content Analysis

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in perception, yet holistic Affective Image Content Analysis (AICA), which integrates perception, reasoning, and generation into a unified framework, remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce AICA-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark with three core tasks: Emotion Understanding (EU), Emotion Reasoning (ER), and Emotion-Guided Content Generation (EGCG). We evaluate 23 VLMs and identify two major limitations: weak intensity calibration and shallow open-ended descriptions. To address these issues, we propose Grounded Affective Tree (GAT) Prompting, a training-free framework that combines visual scaffolding with hierarchical reasoning. Experiments show that GAT reduces intensity errors and improves descriptive depth, providing a strong baseline for future research on affective multimodal understanding and generation.

Dong She, Xianrong Yao, Liqun Chen +3

School of Future Technology,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou

VLM EvaluationVLM CalibrationConditional Image GenerationLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Apr 7, 2026

The Role of Emotional Stimuli and Intensity in Shaping Large Language Model Behavior

Emotional prompting - the use of specific emotional diction in prompt engineering - has shown increasing promise in improving large language model (LLM) performance, truthfulness, and responsibility. However these studies have been limited to single types of positive emotional stimuli and have not considered varying degrees of emotion intensity in their analyses. In this paper, we explore the effects of four distinct emotions - joy, encouragement, anger, and insecurity - in emotional prompting and evaluate them on accuracy, sycophancy, and toxicity. We develop a prompt-generation pipeline with GPT-4o mini to create a suite of LLM and human-generated prompts with varying intensities across the four emotions. Then, we compile a "Gold Dataset" of prompts where human and model labels align. Our empirical evaluation on LLM behavior suggests that positive emotional stimuli lead to more accurate and less toxic results, but also increase sycophantic behavior.

Ameen Patel, Felix Lee, Kyle Liang +1

Irvington High School · Glen A. Wilson High School · Del Norte High School +1

LLM PromptingLLM SafetyLLM Sycophancy
AskPDF
Apr 6, 2026

Optimizing LLM Prompt Engineering with DSPy Based Declarative Learning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown strong performance across a wide range of natural language processing tasks; however, their effectiveness is highly dependent on prompt design, structure, and embedded reasoning signals. Conventional prompt engineering methods largely rely on heuristic trial-and-error processes, which limits scalability, reproducibility, and generalization across tasks. DSPy, a declarative framework for optimizing text-processing pipelines, offers an alternative approach by enabling automated, modular, and learnable prompt construction for LLM-based systems.This paper presents a systematic study of DSPy-based declarative learning for prompt optimization, with emphasis on prompt synthesis, correction, calibration, and adaptive reasoning control. We introduce a unified DSPy LLM architecture that combines symbolic planning, gradient free optimization, and automated module rewriting to reduce hallucinations, improve factual grounding, and avoid unnecessary prompt complexity. Experimental evaluations conducted on reasoning tasks, retrieval-augmented generation, and multi-step chain-of-thought benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in output reliability, efficiency, and generalization across models. The results show improvements of up to 30 to 45% in factual accuracy and a reduction of approximately 25% in hallucination rates. Finally, we outline key limitations and discuss future research directions for declarative prompt optimization frameworks.

Shiek Ruksana, Sailesh Kiran Kurra, Thipparthi Sanjay Baradwaj

Vasavi College of Engineering, Hyderabad, TS, India · Amazon, Texas, United States of America · Vasavi College of Engineering, Telangana, India

LLM PromptingPrompt OptimizationAutomatic Prompt OptimizationLLM Hallucination MitigationLarge Language Model-Guided Optimization
AskPDF
Apr 5, 2026

Combee: Scaling Prompt Learning for Self-Improving Language Model Agents

Recent advances in prompt learning allow large language model agents to acquire task-relevant knowledge from inference-time context without parameter changes. For example, existing methods (like ACE or GEPA) can learn system prompts to improve accuracy based on previous agent runs. However, these methods primarily focus on single-agent or low-parallelism settings. This fundamentally limits their ability to efficiently learn from a large set of collected agentic traces. It would be efficient and beneficial to run prompt learning in parallel to accommodate the growing trend of learning from many agentic traces or parallel agent executions. Yet without a principled strategy for scaling, current methods suffer from quality degradation with high parallelism. To improve both the efficiency and quality of prompt learning, we propose Combee, a novel framework to scale parallel prompt learning for self-improving agents. Combee speeds up learning and enables running many agents in parallel while learning from their aggregate traces without quality degradation. To achieve this, Combee leverages parallel scans and employs an augmented shuffle mechanism; Combee also introduces a dynamic batch size controller to balance quality and delay. Evaluations on AppWorld, Terminal-Bench, Formula, and FiNER demonstrate that Combee achieves up to 17x speedup over previous methods with comparable or better accuracy and equivalent cost.

Hanchen Li, Runyuan He, Qizheng Zhang +11

UC Berkeley · Stanford University · Independent +1

LLM Input OptimizationLLM PromptingLLM Agent Self-Improvement
AskPDF
Apr 4, 2026

When Models Know More Than They Say: Probing Analogical Reasoning in LLMs

Analogical reasoning is a core cognitive faculty essential for narrative understanding. While LLMs perform well when surface and structural cues align, they struggle in cases where an analogy is not apparent on the surface but requires latent information, suggesting limitations in abstraction and generalisation. In this paper we compare a model's probed representations with its prompted performance at detecting narrative analogies, revealing an asymmetry: for rhetorical analogies, probing significantly outperforms prompting in open-source models, while for narrative analogies, they achieve a similar (low) performance. This suggests that the relationship between internal representations and prompted behavior is task-dependent and may reflect limitations in how prompting accesses available information.

Hope McGovern, Caroline Craig, Thomas Lippincott +1

Cambridge University · Northeastern University · Athenahealth +1

Analogical Reasoning for Language ModelsLLM ReasoningLanguage Model ProbingLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Apr 4, 2026

The Format Tax

Asking a large language model to respond in JSON should be a formatting choice, not a capability tax. Yet we find that structured output requirements -- JSON, XML, LaTeX, Markdown -- substantially degrade reasoning and writing performance across open-weight models. The research response has focused on constrained decoding, but sampling bias accounts for only a fraction of the degradation. The dominant cost enters at the prompt: format-requesting instructions alone cause most of the accuracy loss, before any decoder constraint is applied. This diagnosis points to a simple principle: decouple reasoning from formatting. Whether by generating freeform first and reformatting in a second pass, or by enabling extended thinking within a single generation, separating the two concerns substantially recovers lost accuracy. Across six open-weight models, four API models, four formats, and tasks spanning math, science, logic, and writing, decoupling recovers most lost accuracy. Notably, most recent closed-weight models show little to no format tax, suggesting the problem is not inherent to structured generation but a gap that current open-weight models have yet to close. Code is available at https://github.com/ivnle/the-format-tax.

Ivan Yee Lee, Loris D'Antoni, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick

UC San Diego

LLM PromptingStructured Output GenerationLanguage Model Generation EvaluationFraming Effects in Language ModelsConstrained Decoding
AskPDF
Apr 3, 2026

Beyond the Parameters: A Technical Survey of Contextual Enrichment in Large Language Models: From In-Context Prompting to Causal Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Large language models (LLMs) encode vast world knowledge in their parameters, yet they remain fundamentally limited by static knowledge, finite context windows, and weakly structured causal reasoning. This survey provides a unified account of augmentation strategies along a single axis: the degree of structured context supplied at inference time. We cover in-context learning and prompt engineering, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), GraphRAG, and CausalRAG. Beyond conceptual comparison, we provide a transparent literature-screening protocol, a claim-audit framework, and a structured cross-paper evidence synthesis that distinguishes higher-confidence findings from emerging results. The paper concludes with a deployment-oriented decision framework and concrete research priorities for trustworthy retrieval-augmented NLP.

Prakhar Bansal, Shivangi Agarwal

Knowledge Augmentation for Language ModelsRetrieval-Augmented GenerationStructured RAGRetrieval-Augmented ReasoningLLM PromptingGraph Retrieval-Augmented Generation
AskPDF
Apr 3, 2026

The PICCO Framework for Large Language Model Prompting: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Prompt Structure

Large language model (LLM) performance depends heavily on prompt design, yet prompt construction is often described and applied inconsistently. Our purpose was to derive a reference framework for structuring LLM prompts. This paper presents PICCO, a framework derived through a rigorous synthesis of 11 previously published prompting frameworks identified through a multi-database search. The analysis yields two main contributions. First, it proposes a taxonomy that distinguishes prompt frameworks, prompt elements, prompt generation, prompting techniques, and prompt engineering as related but non-equivalent concepts. Second, it derives a five-element reference architecture for prompt generation: Persona, Instructions, Context, Constraints, and Output (PICCO). For each element, we define its function, scope, and relationship to other elements, with the goal of improving conceptual clarity and supporting more systematic prompt design. Finally, to support application of the framework, we outline key concepts relevant to implementation, including prompting techniques (e.g., zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, ensembling, decomposition, and self-critique, with selected variants), human and automated approaches to iterative prompt engineering, responsible prompting considerations such as security, privacy, bias, and trust, and priorities for future research. This work is a conceptual and methodological contribution: it formalizes a common structure for prompt specification and comparison, but does not claim empirical validation of PICCO as an optimization method.

David A. Cook

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science | Mayo Clinic Division of General Internal Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA

LLM PromptingPrompt Engineering
AskPDF
Apr 2, 2026

Social Meaning in Large Language Models: Structure, Magnitude, and Pragmatic Prompting

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly exhibit human-like patterns of pragmatic and social reasoning. This paper addresses two related questions: do LLMs approximate human social meaning not only qualitatively but also quantitatively, and can prompting strategies informed by pragmatic theory improve this approximation? To address the first, we introduce two calibration-focused metrics distinguishing structural fidelity from magnitude calibration: the Effect Size Ratio (ESR) and the Calibration Deviation Score (CDS). To address the second, we derive prompting conditions from two pragmatic assumptions: that social meaning arises from reasoning over linguistic alternatives, and that listeners infer speaker knowledge states and communicative motives. Applied to a case study on numerical (im)precision across three frontier LLMs, we find that all models reliably reproduce the qualitative structure of human social inferences but differ substantially in magnitude calibration. Prompting models to reason about speaker knowledge and motives most consistently reduces magnitude deviation, while prompting for alternative-awareness tends to amplify exaggeration. Combining both components is the only intervention that improves all calibration-sensitive metrics across all models, though fine-grained magnitude calibration remains only partially resolved. LLMs thus capture inferential structure while variably distorting inferential strength, and pragmatic theory provides a useful but incomplete handle for improving that approximation.

Roland Mühlenbernd

Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany

Pragmatic Reasoning in Language ModelsLanguage Model CalibrationLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Apr 2, 2026

Do We Need Frontier Models to Verify Mathematical Proofs?

Advances in training, post-training, and inference-time methods have enabled frontier reasoning models to win gold medals in math competitions and settle challenging open problems. Gaining trust in the responses of these models requires that natural language proofs be checked for errors. LLM judges are increasingly being adopted to meet the growing demand for evaluating such proofs. While verification is considered easier than generation, what model capability does reliable verification actually require? We systematically evaluate four open-source and two frontier LLMs on datasets of human-graded natural language proofs of competition-level problems. We consider two key metrics: verifier accuracy and self-consistency (the rate of agreement across repeated judgments on the same proof). We observe that smaller open-source models are only up to ~10% behind frontier models in accuracy but they are up to ~25% more inconsistent. Furthermore, we see that verifier accuracy is sensitive to prompt choice across all models. We then demonstrate that the smaller models, in fact, do possess the mathematical capabilities to verify proofs at the level of frontier models, but they struggle to reliably elicit these capabilities with general judging prompts. Through an LLM-guided prompt search, we synthesize an ensemble of specialized prompts that overcome the specific failure modes of smaller models, boosting their performance by up to 9.1% in accuracy and 15.9% in self-consistency. These gains are realized across models and datasets, allowing models like Qwen3.5-35B to perform on par with frontier models such as Gemini 3.1 Pro for proof verification.

Aaditya Naik, Guruprerana Shabadi, Rajeev Alur +1

University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

LLM Input OptimizationReasoning VerificationLLM ReasoningLLM EvaluationLLM PromptingSelf-Consistency in Language Models
AskPDF
Apr 2, 2026

Do Emotions in Prompts Matter? Effects of Emotional Framing on Large Language Models

Emotional tone is pervasive in human communication, yet its influence on large language model (LLM) behaviour remains unclear. Here, we examine how first-person emotional framing in user-side queries affect LLM performance across six benchmark domains, including mathematical reasoning, medical question answering, reading comprehension, commonsense reasoning and social inference. Across models and tasks, static emotional prefixes usually produce only small changes in accuracy, suggesting that affective phrasing is typically a mild perturbation rather than a reliable general-purpose intervention. This stability is not uniform: effects are more variable in socially grounded tasks, where emotional context more plausibly interacts with interpersonal reasoning. Additional analyses show that stronger emotional wording induces only modest extra change, and that human-written prefixes reproduce the same qualitative pattern as LLM-generated ones. We then introduce EmotionRL, an adaptive emotional prompting framework that selects emotional framing adaptively for each query. Although no single emotion is consistently beneficial, adaptive selection yields more reliable gains than fixed emotional prompting. Together, these findings show that emotional tone is neither a dominant driver of LLM performance nor irrelevant noise, but a weak and input-dependent signal that can be exploited through adaptive control.

Minda Zhao, Yutong Yang, Chufei Peng +5

Harvard University. · Bryn Mawr College.

LLM PromptingFraming Effects in Language ModelsLLM Evaluation
AskPDF
Apr 2, 2026

Adam's Law: Textual Frequency Law on Large Language Models

While textual frequency has been validated as relevant to human cognition in reading speed, its relatedness to Large Language Models (LLMs) is seldom studied. We propose a novel research direction in terms of textual data frequency, which is an understudied topic, to the best of our knowledge. Our framework is composed of three units. First, this paper proposes Textual Frequency Law (TFL), which indicates that frequent textual data should be preferred for LLMs for both prompting and fine-tuning. Since many LLMs are closed-source in their training data, we propose using online resources to estimate the sentence-level frequency. We then utilize an input paraphraser to paraphrase the input into a more frequent textual expression. Next, we propose Textual Frequency Distillation (TFD) by querying LLMs to conduct story completion by further extending the sentences in the datasets, and the resulting corpora are used to adjust the initial estimation. Finally, we propose Curriculum Textual Frequency Training (CTFT) that fine-tunes LLMs in an increasing order of sentence-level frequency. Experiments are conducted on our curated dataset Textual Frequency Paired Dataset (TFPD) on math reasoning, machine translation, commonsense reasoning and agentic tool calling. Results show the effectiveness of our framework.

Hongyuan Adam Lu, Z. L., Victor Wei +5

FaceMind Corporation · The Chinese University of Hong Kong

LLM PromptingLLM Fine-TuningLLM Training
AskPDF
Apr 2, 2026

Analysis of LLM Performance on AWS Bedrock: Receipt-item Categorisation Case Study

This paper presents a systematic, cost-aware evaluation of large language models (LLMs) for receipt-item categorisation within a production-oriented classification framework. We compare four instruction-tuned models available through AWS Bedrock: Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Claude 4 Sonnet, Mixtral 8x7B Instruct, and Mistral 7B Instruct. The aim of the study was (1) to assess performance across accuracy, response stability, and token-level cost, and (2) to investigate what prompting methods, zero-shot or few-shot, are especially appropriate both in terms of accuracy and in terms of incurred costs. Results of our experiments demonstrated that Claude 3.7 Sonnet achieves the most favourable balance between classification accuracy and cost efficiency.

Gabby Sanchez, Sneha Oommen, Cassandra T. Britto +3

RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

LLM EvaluationClassificationLLM PromptingLLM Inference EfficiencyFew-Shot Prompting
AskPDF
Apr 1, 2026

ReFormeR: Learning and Applying Explicit Query Reformulation Patterns

We present ReFormeR, a pattern-guided approach for query reformulation. Instead of prompting a language model to generate reformulations of a query directly, ReFormeR first elicits short reformulation patterns from pairs of initial queries and empirically stronger reformulations, consolidates them into a compact library of transferable reformulation patterns, and then selects an appropriate reformulation pattern for a new query given its retrieval context. The selected pattern constrains query reformulation to controlled operations such as sense disambiguation, vocabulary grounding, or discriminative facet addition, to name a few. As such, our proposed approach makes the reformulation policy explicit through these reformulation patterns, guiding the LLM towards targeted and effective query reformulations. Our extensive experiments on TREC DL 2019, DL 2020, and DL Hard show consistent improvements over classical feedback methods and recent LLM-based query reformulation and expansion approaches.

Amin Bigdeli, Mert Incesu, Negar Arabzadeh +2

University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada · University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada · University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA

Query ReformulationLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Apr 1, 2026

Information Extraction from Electricity Invoices with General-Purpose Large Language Models

Information extraction from semi-structured business documents remains a critical challenge for enterprise management. This study evaluates the capability of general-purpose Large Language Models to extract structured information from Spanish electricity invoices without task-specific fine-tuning. Using a subset of the IDSEM dataset, we benchmark two architecturally distinct models, Gemini 1.5 Pro and Mistral-small, across 19 parameter configurations and 6 prompting strategies. Our experimental framework treats prompt engineering as the primary experimental variable, comparing zero-shot baselines against increasingly sophisticated few-shot approaches and iterative extraction strategies. Results demonstrate that prompt quality dominates over hyperparameter tuning: the F1-score variation across all parameter configurations is marginal, while the gap between zero-shot and the best few-shot strategy exceeds 19 percentage points. The best configuration (few-shot with cross-validation) achieves an F1-score of 97.61% for Gemini and 96.11% for Mistral-small, with document template structure emerging as the primary determinant of extraction difficulty. These findings establish that prompt design is the critical lever for maximizing extraction fidelity in LLM-based document processing, thereby providing an empirical framework for integrating general-purpose LLMs into business document automation.

Javier Gómez, Javier Sánchez

Centro de Tecnologías de la Imagen (CTIM) Instituto Universitario de Cibernética, Empresas y Sociedad (IUCES) Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain · Centro de Tecnologías de la Imagen (CTIM) Instituto Universitario de Cibernética, Empresas y Sociedad (IUCES) University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

Document Information ExtractionLLM Information ExtractionLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Mar 31, 2026

Long-Document QA with Chain-of-Structured-Thought and Fine-Tuned SLMs

Large language models (LLMs) are widely applied to data analytics over documents, yet direct reasoning over long, noisy documents remains brittle and error-prone. Hence, we study document question answering (QA) that consolidates dispersed evidence into a structured output (e.g., a table, graph, or chunks) to support reliable, verifiable QA. We propose a two-pillar framework, LiteCoST, to achieve both high accuracy and low latency with small language models (SLMs). Pillar 1: Chain-of-Structured-Thought (CoST). We introduce a CoST template, a schema-aware instruction that guides a strong LLM to produce both a step-wise CoST trace and the corresponding structured output. The process induces a minimal structure, normalizes entities/units, aligns records, serializes the output, and verifies/refines it, yielding auditable supervision. Pillar 2: SLM fine-tuning. The compact models are trained on LLM-generated CoST data in two stages: Supervised Fine-Tuning for structural alignment, followed by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) incorporating triple rewards for answer/format quality and process consistency. By distilling structure-first behavior into SLMs, this approach achieves LLM-comparable quality on multi-domain long-document QA using 3B/7B SLMs, while delivering 2-4x lower latency than GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 (671B). The code is available at https://github.com/HKUSTDial/LiteCoST.

Zhuowen Liang, Xiaotian Lin, Zhengxuan Zhang +3

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · EvenUp, USA

Question AnsweringDocument QALLM PromptingLLM Fine-Tuning
AskPDF
Mar 31, 2026

"I Just Need GPT to Refine My Prompts": Rethinking Onboarding and Help-Seeking with Generative 3D Modeling Tools

Learning to use feature-rich software is a persistent challenge, but generative AI tools promise to lower this barrier by replacing complex navigation with natural language prompts. We investigated how people approach prompt-based tools for 3D modeling in an observational study with 26 participants (14 casuals, 12 professionals). Consistent with earlier work, participants skipped tutorials and manuals, relying on trial and error. What differed in the generative AI context was how and why they sought support: the prompt box became the entry point for learning, collapsing onboarding into immediate action, while some casual users turned to external LLMs for prompts. Professionals used 3D expertise to refine iterations and critically evaluated outputs, often discarding models that did not meet their standards, whereas casual users settled for "good enough." We contribute empirical insights into how generative AI reshapes help-seeking, highlighting new practices of onboarding, recursive AI-for-AI support, and shifting expertise in interpreting outputs.

Kanak Gautam, Poorvi Bhatia, Parmit K. Chilana

Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Human-AI InteractionLLM PromptingGenerative Modeling
AskPDF
Mar 30, 2026

From Reviews to Requirements: Can LLMs Generate Human-Like User Stories?

App store reviews provide a constant flow of real user feedback that can help improve software requirements. However, these reviews are often messy, informal, and difficult to analyze manually at scale. Although automated techniques exist, many do not perform well when replicated and often fail to produce clean, backlog-ready user stories for agile projects. In this study, we evaluate how well large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 Turbo, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and Mistral 7B Instruct can generate usable user stories directly from raw app reviews. Using the Mini-BAR dataset of 1,000+ health app reviews, we tested zero-shot, one-shot, and two-shot prompting methods. We evaluated the generated user stories using both human judgment (via the RUST framework) and a RoBERTa classifier fine-tuned on UStAI to assess their overall quality. Our results show that LLMs can match or even outperform humans in writing fluent, well-formatted user stories, especially when few-shot prompts are used. However, they still struggle to produce independent and unique user stories, which are essential for building a strong agile backlog. Overall, our findings show how LLMs can reliably turn unstructured app reviews into actionable software requirements, providing developers with clear guidance to turn user feedback into meaningful improvements.

Shadman Sakib, Oishy Fatema Akhand, Tasnia Tasneem +1

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Islamic University of Technology (IUT), Gazipur, Bangladesh

Requirements EngineeringText GenerationLanguage Model Generation EvaluationLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Mar 30, 2026

Beyond the Answer: Decoding the Behavior of LLMs as Scientific Reasoners

As Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve increasingly sophisticated performance on complex reasoning tasks, current architectures serve as critical proxies for the internal heuristics of frontier models. Characterizing emergent reasoning is vital for long-term interpretability and safety. Furthermore, understanding how prompting modulates these processes is essential, as natural language will likely be the primary interface for interacting with AGI systems. In this work, we use a custom variant of Genetic Pareto (GEPA) to systematically optimize prompts for scientific reasoning tasks, and analyze how prompting can affect reasoning behavior. We investigate the structural patterns and logical heuristics inherent in GEPA-optimized prompts, and evaluate their transferability and brittleness. Our findings reveal that gains in scientific reasoning often correspond to model-specific heuristics that fail to generalize across systems, which we call "local" logic. By framing prompt optimization as a tool for model interpretability, we argue that mapping these preferred reasoning structures for LLMs is an important prerequisite for effectively collaborating with superhuman intelligence.

Rohan Pandey, Eric Ye, Michael Li

Carnegie Mellon University

LLM PromptingLLM InterpretabilityScientific Reasoning in Language ModelsPrompt OptimizationPrompt Robustness
AskPDF
Mar 29, 2026

Model Capability Dominates: Inference-Time Optimization Lessons from AIMO 3

Majority voting over multiple LLM attempts improves mathematical reasoning, but correlated errors limit the effective sample size. A natural fix is to assign different reasoning strategies to different voters. The approach, Diverse Prompt Mixer, is tested on the AIMO 3 competition: 3 models, 23+ experiments, 50 IMO-level problems, one H100 80 GB, 5-hour limit. Every prompt-level intervention fails. High-temperature sampling already decorrelates errors; weaker strategies reduce accuracy more than they reduce correlation. Across an 8-point capability gap at equal N=8 and every optimization tested, model capability dominates. The gap between the best majority-vote score (42/50) and pass@20 (~45.5) is selection loss, not prompt loss. A verifier-based selector could close it. Prompt engineering cannot.

Natapong Nitarach

LLM ReasoningLLM PromptingLanguage Model EnsemblesTest-Time ScalingSelf-Consistency Decoding
AskPDF
Mar 29, 2026

Umwelt Engineering: Designing the Cognitive Worlds of Linguistic Agents

I propose Umwelt engineering -- the deliberate design of the linguistic cognitive environment -- as a third layer in the agent design stack, upstream of both prompt and context engineering. Two experiments test the thesis that altering the medium of reasoning alters cognition itself. In Experiment 1, three language models reason under two vocabulary constraints -- No-Have (eliminating possessive "to have") and E-Prime (eliminating "to be") -- across seven tasks (N=4,470 trials). No-Have improves ethical reasoning by 19.1 pp (p < 0.001), classification by 6.5 pp (p < 0.001), and epistemic calibration by 7.4 pp, while achieving 92.8% constraint compliance. E-Prime shows dramatic but model-dependent effects: cross-model correlations reach r = -0.75. In Experiment 2, 16 linguistically constrained agents tackle 17 debugging problems. No constrained agent outperforms the control individually, yet a 3-agent ensemble achieves 100% ground-truth coverage versus 88.2% for the control. A permutation test confirms only 8% of random 3-agent subsets achieve full coverage, and every successful subset contains the counterfactual agent. Two mechanisms emerge: cognitive restructuring and cognitive diversification. The primary limitation is the absence of an active control matching constraint prompt elaborateness.

Rodney Jehu-Appiah

LLM PromptingSoftware Engineering Agents
AskPDF
Mar 28, 2026

Improving Attributed Long-form Question Answering with Intent Awareness

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used to generate comprehensive, knowledge-intensive reports. However, while these models are trained on diverse academic papers and reports, they are not exposed to the reasoning processes and intents that guide authors in crafting these documents. We hypothesize that enhancing a model's intent awareness can significantly improve the quality of generated long-form reports. We develop and employ structured, tag-based schemes to better elicit underlying implicit intents to write or cite. We demonstrate that these extracted intents enhance both zero-shot generation capabilities in LLMs and enable the creation of high-quality synthetic data for fine-tuning smaller models. Our experiments reveal improved performance across various challenging scientific report generation tasks, with an average improvement of +2.9 and +12.3 absolute points for large and small models over baselines, respectively. Furthermore, our analysis illuminates how intent awareness enhances model citation usage and substantially improves report readability.

Xinran Zhao, Aakanksha Naik, Jay DeYoung +4

Allen Institute for AI · Carnegie Mellon University · University of Washington

Long-Form Document GenerationText GenerationLLM PromptingAI-Assisted Scientific Research
AskPDF
Mar 28, 2026

Self-Describing Structured Data with Dual-Layer Guidance: A Lightweight Alternative to RAG for Precision Retrieval in Large-Scale LLM Knowledge Navigation

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a well-documented positional bias when processing long input contexts: information in the middle of a context window receives substantially less attention than content at the boundaries, a phenomenon termed the Lost-in-the-Middle effect (Liu et al., 2024). This limits knowledge-retrieval applications that embed large structured knowledge bases directly in the LLM context. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses scalability by retrieving only relevant fragments, but introduces substantial infrastructure overhead and is ill-suited to libraries whose semantic boundaries are human-defined rather than statistically learned. We propose Self-Describing Structured Retrieval (SDSR), a lightweight framework in which structured data files embed human-authored navigational metadata at the file's primacy position, thereby exploiting rather than fighting the LLM's primacy bias. We further propose a Dual-Layer Guidance strategy combining in-file metadata with explicit routing rules in the system prompt. We validate SDSR through a four-round benchmark using a 190-skill library expanded from 36 to 119 categories via adversarial distractor injection. Four conditions are tested: (A) no guidance, (B) in-file summary only, (C) prompt hint only, (D) both combined. Version D achieves 100% primary routing accuracy (20/20) at 119 categories versus 65% for the no-guidance baseline. We identify a fundamental asymmetry: primary routing is solvable by explicit rules, while secondary cross-category routing requires architectural intent explicitly encoded in the data structure. We further extend SDSR to semi-structured corpora, showing how cross-reference encoding enables operation without vector databases in domains with recoverable document structure.

Hung Ming Liu

PARRAWA AI

Lost-in-the-Middle EffectInformation RetrievalLLM RoutingLLM Prompting
AskPDF
Mar 27, 2026

RASPRef: Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement for Large Reasoning Models

Recent reasoning-focused language models such as DeepSeek R1 and OpenAI o1 have demonstrated strong performance on structured reasoning benchmarks including GSM8K, MATH, and multi-hop question answering tasks. However, their performance remains highly sensitive to prompt formulation, and designing effective prompts is typically a manual and iterative process that does not scale well across tasks or domains. To address this limitation, we introduce Retrieval-Augmented Self-Supervised Prompt Refinement (RASPRef), a framework that improves prompts without requiring human annotations or task-specific supervision. The approach retrieves relevant examples and previously generated reasoning trajectories, and leverages signals such as multi-sample consistency, verifier feedback, and model-generated critiques to iteratively refine the prompt. Unlike prior approaches that focus primarily on improving model outputs, RASPRef directly treats the prompt as the optimization target and improves it through an iterative retrieval-guided refinement process. Experiments on GSM8K-style mathematical reasoning tasks show that retrieval-guided prompting improves performance compared with a static prompting baseline. We further discuss how retrieval quality, trajectory selection, and self-supervised feedback signals may influence the effectiveness of prompt refinement. These findings suggest that prompt design remains a critical factor for reasoning-oriented language models, and that self-improving prompts offer a practical and scalable strategy for improving reasoning performance.

Rahul Soni

Independent Researcher

LLM Input OptimizationLLM PromptingLLM Self-RefinementLarge Reasoning Models
AskPDF