We propose Markov Chain from Human Feedback (MCHF), an elementary approach for aligning generative models from pairwise human preferences. Unlike Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which reduces comparisons to a scalar reward, and Nash Learning from Human Feedback (NLHF), which preserves pairwise utilities through a KL-regularized minimax optimization, MCHF uses pairwise preferences directly to define a transition mechanism over model outputs. Given a pairwise utility
U(x,y), which quantifies human preference for
y over
x, and a reference probability distribution
μref, we define a Markov kernel
P(x,dy)∝exp(U(x,y))μref(dy), and take the Markov chain starting from
μref as an iterative alignment procedure. We show that MCHF converges geometrically fast to the stationary distribution, with a convergence rate governed by the seminorm
∥U∥⊕=infg,f∈L∞(μref)∥U−g⊕f∥∞, which quantifies the non-transitive structure of the pairwise utility. We further show that a mirror-descent algorithm for NLHF satisfies an analogous structure-adaptive convergence guarantee. Finally, through a perturbation analysis, we prove that when
∥U∥⊕ is small, MCHF and NLHF agree up to first order around an RLHF solution, which yields a unified view of reward-based, game-theoretic, and Markovian approaches to alignment. In particular, for two natural algorithms that converge to the MCHF/NLHF equilibria, we show that the first step of MCHF and NLHF recovers the RLHF solution based on the column-sum reward
f^(y)=∫μref(dx)U(x,y), and starting from the second iteration, both algorithms incorporate the same linear functional of the residual
U−(−f^)⊕f^, which captures the non-transitive structure of the pairwise utility
U.