MT Evaluation

MT: Machine Translation

Overview

Machine translation evaluation studies how well translations preserve meaning and meet linguistic, cultural, and practical needs, helping researchers compare systems and identify failures. Approaches range from reference-based metrics such as BLEU and chrF to neural metrics such as COMET, quality estimation without references, and human assessment using error taxonomies like MQM. Benchmarks increasingly test low-resource languages, specialized domains, document context, cultural nuance, speech, and images, while LLM judges and targeted error checks offer ways to assess qualities that simple text overlap misses. A central challenge is that automatic scores can disagree with human judgments and overlook valid variation, so reliable evaluation must balance scalable metrics with context-sensitive human review.

Latest papers

CardsList

173 papers16 papers in the last four weeks, down 38% on the four weeks before. 0.1% of all new papers.

  1. Nsanku: Evaluating Zero-Shot Translation Performance of LLMs for Ghanaian Languages

    May 5, 2026Stephen E. Moore, Mich-Seth Owusu, Akwasi Asare +13Low-Resource Language ProcessingOpen-Weight Language Models

  2. VIDA: A Dataset for Visually Dependent Ambiguity in Multimodal Machine Translation

    May 3, 2026Jingheng Pan, Xintong Wang, Longyue Wang +3Large Vision-Language ModelsMultimodal MT

  3. Is Textual Similarity Invariant under Machine Translation? Evidence Based on the Political Manifesto Corpus

    May 1, 2026Daria Boratyn, Damian Brzyski, Albert Leśniak +5Semantic Textual SimilarityText Embedding Evaluation

  4. Cultural Benchmarking of LLMs in Standard and Dialectal Arabic Dialogues

    Apr 30, 2026Muhammad Dehan Al Kautsar, Saeed Almheiri, Momina Ahsan +13Low-Resource Language ProcessingArabic NLP

  5. Culture-Aware Machine Translation in Large Language Models: Benchmarking and Investigation

    Apr 27, 2026Zekun Yuan, Yangfan Ye, Xiaocheng Feng +5LLM EvaluationCultural Knowledge in Language Models

  6. FairQE: Multi-Agent Framework for Mitigating Gender Bias in Translation Quality Estimation

    Apr 23, 2026Jinhee Jang, Juhwan Choi, Dongjin Lee +2Algorithmic FairnessMT Evaluation

  7. LQM: Linguistically Motivated Multidimensional Quality Metrics for Machine Translation

    Apr 20, 2026Samar M. Magdy, Fakhraddin Alwajih, Abdellah El Mekki +2Arabic NLPMachine Translation

  8. Beyond Reproduction: A Paired-Task Framework for Assessing LLM Comprehension and Creativity in Literary Translation

    Apr 20, 2026Ran Zhang, Steffen Eger, Arda Tezcan +3Creativity AssessmentLLM Evaluation

  9. Who Watches the Watchmen? Humans Disagree With Translation Metrics on Unseen Domains

    Apr 19, 2026Finn Schmidt, Jan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas +1Annotator DisagreementAutomated Evaluation

  10. Fabricator or dynamic translator?

    Apr 16, 2026Lisa Vasileva, Karin SimLLM EvaluationHallucination Detection

  11. XQ-MEval: A Dataset with Cross-lingual Parallel Quality for Benchmarking Translation Metrics

    Apr 16, 2026Jingxuan Liu, Zhi Qu, Jin Tei +3MT Evaluation

  12. Round-Trip Translation Reveals What Frontier Multilingual Benchmarks Miss

    Apr 14, 2026Ronald Skorobogat, Ameya Prabhu, Matthias BethgeMultilingual Language Model EvaluationLanguage Model Generation Evaluation

  13. Should We be Pedantic About Reasoning Errors in Machine Translation?

    Apr 10, 2026Calvin Bao, Marine CarpuatMachine TranslationMT Evaluation

  14. Blinded Radiologist and LLM-Based Evaluation of LLM-Generated Japanese Translations of Chest CT Reports: Comparative Study

    Apr 2, 2026Yosuke Yamagishi, Atsushi Takamatsu, Yasunori Hamaguchi +4Radiology Report EvaluationMT Evaluation

  15. GaelEval: Benchmarking LLM Performance for Scottish Gaelic

    Apr 2, 2026Peter Devine, William Lamb, Beatrice Alex +5Multilingual Language Model EvaluationLLM Evaluation

  16. Diagnosing Translated Benchmarks: An Automated Quality Assurance Study of the EU20 Benchmark Suite

    Apr 2, 2026Klaudia Thellmann, Bernhard Stadler, Michael FärberBenchmark AuditingMT Evaluation

  17. Open Machine Translation for Esperanto

    Mar 31, 2026Ona de Gibert, Lluís de GibertMachine TranslationMT Evaluation

  18. Translation or Recitation? Calibrating Evaluation Scores for Machine Translation of Extremely Low-Resource Languages

    Mar 26, 2026Danlu Chen, Ka Sing He, Jiahe Tian +4Low-Resource MTMT Evaluation

  19. MMTIT-Bench: A Multilingual and Multi-Scenario Benchmark with Cognition-Perception-Reasoning Guided Text-Image Machine Translation

    Mar 25, 2026Gengluo Li, Chengquan Zhang, Yupu Liang +9Image Text TranslationMachine Translation

  20. Span-Level Machine Translation Meta-Evaluation

    Mar 20, 2026Stefano Perrella, Eric Morales Agostinho, Hugo ZaragozaMT Evaluation

  21. ConGA: Guidelines for Contextual Gender Annotation. A Framework for Annotating Gender in Machine Translation

    Mar 18, 2026Argentina Anna Rescigno, Eva Vanmassenhove, Johanna MontiMachine TranslationMT Evaluation

  22. From Words to Worlds: Benchmarking Cross-Cultural Cultural Understanding in Machine Translation

    Mar 18, 2026Bangju Han, Yingqi Wang, Huang Qing +6Cross-Cultural Language Model EvaluationMachine Translation

  23. Omnilingual MT: Machine Translation for 1,600 Languages

    Mar 17, 2026Omnilingual MT Team, Belen Alastruey, Niyati Bafna +29Machine TranslationLow-Resource MT

  24. Bidirectional Chinese and English Passive Sentences Dataset for Machine Translation

    Mar 16, 2026Xinyue Ma, Pol Pastells, Mireia Farrús +1Machine TranslationMT Evaluation

  25. Developing an English-Efik Corpus and Machine Translation System for Digitization Inclusion

    Mar 16, 2026Offiong Bassey Edet, Mbuotidem Sunday Awak, Emmanuel Oyo-Ita +2Machine TranslationLow-Resource MT