On-Policy Self-Distillation

Ask about this topic

Overview

On-policy self-distillation studies how a model can improve from its own generated responses, using a teacher version of the model to provide token-level guidance along the student’s actual trajectories. Common approaches give the teacher extra information, such as solutions, critiques, visual evidence, or task feedback, and use filtering, confidence weighting, or reference anchoring to make its guidance more useful. Methods are being applied to language-model reasoning, tool-using agents, multimodal tasks, and generative models, often alongside verifiers or reinforcement-learning methods such as GRPO and RLVR. A central tension is that privileged guidance can correct errors but also encourage shortcuts, suppress exploration, or harm out-of-distribution generalization, so reliable and transferable supervision remains an open challenge.

Latest papers

CardsList

162 papers58 papers in the last four weeks, up 383% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.

Jun 17, 2026

Visual-OPSD: Cross-Modal On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient Unified Multimodal Reasoning

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) interleave generated ''visual thoughts'' (VTs) with text reasoning to improve spatial tasks. This incurs roughly an order-of-magnitude inference cost from multi-step diffusion. We find this cost yields limited direct benefit. On ThinkMorph, removing or noising VTs barely changes accuracy across nine benchmarks. Once rendered, attention concentrates on the VT regardless of content. Yet a KL diagnostic shows that conditioning on a privileged VT trace shifts the model's completion distribution. This suggests the generation pathway encodes useful reasoning beyond the rendered pixels. Motivated by this gap, we propose Visual On-Policy Self-Distillation(Visual-OPSD). Teacher and student share identical weights but differ in context: the teacher sees privileged VTs while the student sees only the question. Token-level JSD distillation on on-policy student trajectories transfers the teacher's reasoning to a text-only student. Across nine benchmarks, Visual-OPSD improves over its generative teacher by +3.40+3.40pp with 14.3×14.3\times speedup (10.0s vs. 142.8s per sample) and outperforms same-scale VLMs by +63.83+63.83pp on VSP. A Gaussian-noise control (+0.40+0.40pp vs. +10.28+10.28pp for real VTs) and 58.4%58.4\% closure of the KL gap confirm that gains come from the semantic content of the generation pathway.

Pengyu Li, Zhitao Gao, Lingling Zhang +5

Xi’an Jiaotong University · Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Big Data Knowledge Engineering · MOE KLINNS Lab, Xi’an Jiaotong University +1

Cross-Modal Knowledge DistillationEfficient Multimodal InferenceUnified Multimodal ModelsOn-Policy Self-DistillationMultimodal ReasoningMultimodal Foundation Models+1
AskPDF
Jun 17, 2026

Learning from Your Own Mistakes: Constructing Learnable Micro-Reflective Trajectories for Self-Distillation

Self-distillation improves reasoning in large language models by using the model's own rollouts as training signal, typically through implicit logit-level alignment that minimizes KL divergence toward a privileged target distribution. However, because this supervision is generated via uncontrolled sampling, it provides no diagnostic insight into the model's specific errors or corrective guidance for its individual failure patterns. Consequently, the model learns to imitate a privileged distribution rather than receiving fine-grained corrections that pinpoint where and why its reasoning fails. In this paper, we propose Trajectory-Augmented Policy Optimization (TAPO), which advances self-distillation from implicit distributional alignment to explicit trajectory construction. During RL training, the model produces both correct and incorrect rollouts to the same query, and TAPO leverages this contrastive structure to construct micro-reflective corrections, new training trajectories that retain the model's erroneous reasoning up to the point of failure, then insert a natural-language diagnosis and corrected reasoning guided by a correct reference from the same sampling group. Since each trajectory is anchored in the learner's own prefix and solutions, the corrective signal preserves the model's on-policy distribution to a greater extent than the position-wise alignment imposed by KL-based methods. To integrate these trajectories, TAPO introduces difficulty-aware candidate selection at the model's capability boundary and decoupled advantage estimation to prevent gradient contamination. Experiments on AIME 2024, AIME 2025, and HMMT 2025 show that TAPO achieves consistent improvements over GRPO under the same number of training steps. Further analysis demonstrates that TAPO strengthens both first-pass reasoning and error-correction effectiveness.

Zhilin Huang, Hang Gao, Ziqiang Dong +6

Qwen Business Unit of Alibaba · Tsinghua University · Peking University

LLM Self-CorrectionCoT DistillationOn-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
Jun 16, 2026

Learning from the Self-future: On-policy Self-distillation for dLLMs

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has proven effective for post-training large language models (LLMs), yet its application to diffusion LLMs (dLLMs) remains unexplored. Existing OPSD methods are inherently autoregressive-centric. They inject privileged information via left-to-right prefix conditioning with token-level divergence supervision, a design that fundamentally conflicts with the arbitraryorder generation of dLLMs. We introduce d-OPSD, the first OPSD framework tailored for dLLMs. Our approach makes two core contributions. First, we reframe self-teacher construction by using self-generated answers as suffix conditioning, enabling the student model to learn from "self future-experience" rather than privileged prefixes. Second, we shift supervision from token-level to step-level, aligning training with the iterative denoising process of dLLMs. Experiments across four reasoning benchmarks show that d-OPSD consistently outperforms RLVR and SFT baselines with superior sample efficiency, requiring only around 10% of the optimization steps by RLVR and opening a promising pathway for dLLM posttraining. The code is available at https://github.com/xingzhejun/d-OPSD.

Yifu Luo, Zeyu Chen, Haoyu Wang +4

Tsinghua University · Technical University of Munich · Nanyang Technological University +5

On-Policy Self-DistillationDiffusion Language Model TrainingDiffusion Language ModelsLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
Jun 16, 2026

Trust the Right Teacher: Quality-Aware Self-Distillation for GUI Grounding

GUI grounding requires vision-language models (VLMs) to identify small target elements in high-resolution screenshots and predict precise screen coordinates. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is a promising post-training approach for this coordinate-sensitive task because it provides dense token-level teacher signals beyond hard coordinate labels. However, naive OPSD is not well-suited to GUI grounding: since the teacher is evaluated on student-generated prefixes, its coordinate-token signals can become unreliable once a prefix deviates from the target coordinate. We propose quality-aware self-distillation for GUI grounding, centered on direct spatial correctness verification of teacher predictions. A soft gate checks whether the teacher's top coordinate-token prediction can still be completed into the ground-truth box under the student-generated prefix and down-weights the signal when this check fails. Teacher-probability scaling then uses the teacher's confidence to further calibrate the gated supervision. A key empirical finding is that neither component alone improves overall performance, whereas combining them consistently does. This suggests that the two mechanisms play complementary roles: gating suppresses unreliable coordinate-token supervision, while probability scaling calibrates the remaining signals. Experiments across six GUI grounding benchmarks show that our method consistently improves the base model and outperforms strong baselines.

Jingyuan Huang, Zuming Huang, Yucheng Shi +4

University of Georgia · INFLY Tech · Tencent AI Lab +1

On-Policy Self-DistillationGUI GroundingVLM DistillationVision-Language Grounding
AskPDF
Jun 14, 2026

OmniOPSD: Rationale-Privileged On-Policy Self-Distillation for Affective Computing

Reinforcement learning for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is often hindered by severe reward sparsity in complex reasoning tasks. This challenge is particularly pronounced in human-centered scenarios involving states, emotions, intentions, and behaviors, where heterogeneous multimodal signals and subjective human factors make high-quality chain-of-thought (CoT) annotations expensive and difficult to obtain. Although many multimodal datasets provide expert-annotated ground-truth labels, directly using these labels for supervised fine-tuning may encourage shortcut learning in multimodal perception and provides limited transparency for safety-critical human--AI interaction. To address these limitations, we propose OmniOPSD, a Rationale-Privileged On-Policy Self-Distillation framework that uses frontier-generated rationales as teacher-side privileged evidence rather than student imitation targets. OmniOPSD uses frontier-generated evidence-aware rationales only as training-time privileged evidence context for a local teacher. The student samples its own rollout from the original multimodal input, while the rationale-privileged teacher scores the same tokens and provides dense token-level supervision. Thus, the student learns on its own trajectory distribution without directly imitating frontier-model completions, and inference requires no labels, rationales, CoT annotations, or closed-source model access. Experiments on MER-UniBench show that OmniOPSD achieves state-of-the-art performance with an average score of 84.1984.19, and ablations further support the value of rationale-privileged teacher guidance.

Zebang Cheng, Shuimu Chen, Boxue Yang +7

Shenzhen University · Guangdong Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Economy (SZ) · Tsinghua University +6

On-Policy Self-DistillationMultimodal Large Language ModelsMultimodal ReasoningMultimodal Foundation ModelsRL for VLMsAffective Computing+1
AskPDF
Jun 9, 2026

ParaBridge: Bridging Paralinguistic Perception and Dialogue Behavior in Speech Language Models

Speech carries more information than just words: a child's voice, a fearful tone, or a noisy background should all lead a sufficiently competent spoken-dialogue assistant to different replies. Current Speech Language Models (SLMs) can recognize such paralinguistic cues but often ignore them in open-ended dialogue. We observe that a simple paralinguistic instruction scaffold at the inference stage narrows this perception-behavior gap, suggesting that the relevant cues are already latent in the model. Such scaffolds, however, remain brittle under multi-turn context and competing instructions. Therefore, we propose ParaBridge, an on-policy self-distillation method that turns a brittle inference-time scaffold into stable model behavior. During training, the scaffold serves only as a temporary privileged view; the scaffold-free model rolls out its own response, while the scaffolded view supplies dense, full-vocabulary next-token targets along its trajectory. This supervision teaches when non-lexical cues should affect the reply without the need for curated dialogues, human labels, or external reward models. On Qwen3-Omni-thinking, ParaBridge raises scaffold-free VoxSafeBench SAR from 14.6%14.6\% to 40.3%40.3\% and improves EchoMind average rating from 3.273.27 to 3.923.92. It also preserves general ability, with MMAU-Pro, VoiceBench, and GPQA all within 0.40.4 points of the original model. Beyond the training distribution, ParaBridge generalizes to unseen paralinguistic cues, transfers from safety-oriented training to empathy-oriented dialogue, and works on a different SLM backbone.

Yuxiang Wang, Qinke Ni, Shengbo Cai +3

1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · 2Tencent Hunyuan · 5Tsinghua University +2

On-Policy Self-DistillationSpoken Dialogue SystemsLanguage Model DistillationSpeech Language Models
AskPDF
Jun 7, 2026

Thinking Without Images: Internalizing Visual Manipulation with On-Policy Self-Distillation

''Thinking with Images'' has emerged as an effective paradigm for fine-grained visual reasoning: by explicitly zooming into relevant regions and reasoning over crops, models can access local evidence that is difficult to recover from a single global image. However, this benefit comes with redundant tool invocations and longer inference traces. Moreover, when such behaviors are learned mainly from outcome reward, the resulting intermediate crops or visual cues can be noisy or fail to faithfully capture task-relevant visual evidence. In this work, we ask whether the reasoning benefits of ''Thinking with Images'' can be internalized through Thinking with Imagination: an internal process that decides where to look and imagines what visual cues closer inspection would reveal without actually invoking tools. We propose Imagine-OPD, an on-policy self-distillation framework in which a teacher plays the role of a ''Thinking with Images'' reasoner during training: it receives privileged zoomed evidence views derived from annotated regions, and supervises the model's own imagination reasoning trajectories. Imagine-OPD does not require an external teacher or high-quality imagination demonstrations. Experiments on vision-centric benchmarks show that Imagine-OPD achieves the best average performance among compared models while significantly reducing inference overhead compared with ''Thinking with Images'' methods.

Yishuo Cai, Jiahui Liu, Yuanxin Liu +9

1State Key Laboratory of Multimedia Information Processing, School of Computer Science, Peking University · 2Central South University · University of Science and Technology of China +2

Tool Use in VLMsEfficient VLM InferenceOn-Policy Self-DistillationLatent Visual ReasoningVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Jun 2, 2026

Physics-Guided Policy Optimization with Self-Distillation

Self-distilled policy optimization (SDPO) has become a popular paradigm for LLM post-training, where a model learns from its own predictions conditioned on privileged information. SDPO, however, is sensitive to how much each update step should be trusted: corrections from a self-teacher can be highly informative on some batches and misleading on others, and applying them uniformly with a fixed step size can destabilize training. Drawing inspiration from viscous-fluid dynamics and formalizing the analogy at the SDE level, we propose Physics-Guided Policy Optimization (PGPO), which introduces an information-modulated step-size multiplier derived from a mutual-information estimate between the student's predictions and the feedback-conditioned teacher. We show that this modulation preserves the order-1 weak-approximation guarantees of vanilla SGD, and incurs negligible overhead per iteration. We evaluate PGPO on the Science-QA dataset, where it outperforms SDPO on 3 of the 4 domains with gains of up to +4.5 points, while remaining stable in a setting where SDPO collapses late in training.

Ke Wang, Yuning Wu, Haoran Liu +3

Amazon, Arlington, USA · Amazon, New York, USA · Amazon, San Jose, USA +1

On-Policy Self-DistillationPolicy OptimizationAdaptive Learning RateLLM Post-Training
AskPDF
Jun 2, 2026

World Models Meet Language Models: On the Complementarity of Concrete and Abstract Reasoning

World models and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) provide complementary capabilities for predicting future outcomes from static visual observations. World models can generate concrete visual rollouts of possible futures, while MLLMs can reason abstractly over questions, goals, and rules. However, generated rollouts are stochastic and may be visually plausible but task-incorrect, making it necessary to determine when visual simulation is useful, whether a rollout is credible, and how it should influence the final answer. We formulate this problem as controlled concrete reasoning, where a model learns to invoke, verify, and integrate visual future simulation alongside abstract reasoning. To study this setting, we construct two human-verified benchmarks, VRQABench for controllable spatial lookahead and OpenWorldQA for open-domain physical prediction, and propose Privileged-Future On-Policy Self-Distillation (PF-OPSD). During training, PF-OPSD uses ground-truth future videos and answers only as teacher-side privileged context to evaluate on-policy concrete-reasoning trajectories, while the deployable student never observes true futures at test time. Experimental results show that PF-OPSD outperforms baseline by 10.6% and 10.9% on VRQABench and OpenWorldQA, respectively, while increasing robustness to noisy or conflicting rollouts. Our code and dataset are available at https://github.com/yczhou001/PF-OPSD.

Yucheng Zhou, Wei Tao, Yiwen Guo +1

University of Macau · LIGHTSPEED · Independent Researcher

On-Policy Self-DistillationWorld ModelsMultimodal ReasoningVLM ReasoningVisually Grounded Reasoning
AskPDF
Jun 2, 2026

When Should the Teacher Move? Temporal Coupling and Stability in Self On-Policy Distillation

Self on-policy distillation trains a student policy against a teacher derived from its own parameter history, yet the teacher's update schedule -- which governs the temporal coupling between teacher and student -- has not been systematically studied as a stability variable. Through a controlled schedule sweep on Qwen3-8B, we establish that isolation periods, defined as complete teacher freezing between updates, are the key structural property enabling stable learning, not teacher age. To characterize these underlying training dynamics, we introduce a diagnostic framework of temporal KL structure, refresh shock, and length-tail risk. This framework further uncovers state-oblivious collapse: optimal short-horizon fixed schedules catastrophically fail under long-horizon training because a clock-driven refresh can copy a transiently drifting student into the teacher in a single, irreversible step. This failure mode is invisible under short-horizon evaluation and mechanistically distinct from EMA's chronic contamination. To address this, we propose Consolidation-Gated Teacher Refresh (CGTR), which preserves isolation periods while gating each refresh on joint evidence of reward improvement and length-tail safety, ensuring every teacher movement responds to genuine student consolidation rather than a clock signal. With a single shared parameter set and no per-dataset retuning, CGTR achieves zero collapse and the best final score on all four tasks (Chemistry, Biology, Physics, ToolUse), self-regulating its refresh frequency to each task's learning dynamics.

Haowei Guo, Baolong Bi, Ruicheng Zhang +3

Peking University · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Tsinghua University

On-Policy Self-DistillationLanguage Model DistillationRL Post-TrainingTeacher-Student Learning
AskPDF
Jun 2, 2026

Constitutional On-Policy Safe Distillation

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as an efficient post-training paradigm by using a teacher conditioned on privileged information to provide dense token-level supervision. Prior work has shown that OPSD can collapse in verifiable reasoning tasks, but safety alignment differs in that it is guided by high-level constitutions rather than explicit target answers, making it a natural setting to revisit dense distillation. However, our pilot study show that safety OPSD still suffers from severe collapse: constitutional conditioning contracts the teacher distribution toward short and overly conservative responses, and Reverse KL further amplifies this contraction into reduced expressiveness. We formalize this effect as geometric leakage under safety boundaries in a non-orthogonal semantic space, where safety pressure transfers into the expressiveness dimension. Based on this analysis, we propose Constitutional On-Policy Safe Distillation (COPSD), which first calibrates the teacher through a Cross-SFT cold-start and then performs constitution-conditioned on-policy distillation. Experiments on 12 benchmarks show that COPSD achieves a consistently stronger safety--helpfulness trade-off than baselines while substantially reducing the safety tax on general reasoning ability.

Ming Wen, Yuxuan Liu, Kun Yang +8

Institute of Trustworthy Embodied AI, Fudan University · 2Shanghai Innovation Institute · 3Ant Group +3

On-Policy Self-DistillationLLM Safety AlignmentLanguage Model Distillation
AskPDF
Jun 2, 2026

Self-Distilled Policy Gradient

On-policy self-distillation, where a language model conditions on privileged context to supervise its own generations, is a promising source of dense supervision for sparse-reward reinforcement learning. Actually, it can be instantiated as an auxiliary full-vocabulary student-to-teacher reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence loss. We therefore propose SDPG, a self-distilled policy-gradient framework that combines group-relative verifier advantages with normalized standard deviation, exact full-vocabulary on-policy self-distillation, as well as reference-policy KL regularization. Empirically, SDPG improves stability and performance over RLVR and self-distillation baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/lauyikfung/SDPG.

Yifeng Liu, Shiyuan Zhang, Yifan Zhang +1

Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA · Princeton AI Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

Policy GradientOn-Policy Self-DistillationReinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsPolicy Gradient Methods
AskPDF
May 30, 2026

Internalize the Temperature: On-Policy Self-Distillation as Policy Reheater for Reinforcement Learning

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards improves the reasoning ability of large language models, but often suffers from entropy collapse, in which increasingly concentrated policies reduce rollout diversity and useful learning signals. Existing remedies either constrain the RL objective (e.g., entropy regularization) or adjust sampling temperature during rollout collection, but these interventions remain external to the model parameters. We propose Temperature-Scaled On-Policy Self-Distillation (TS-OPSD), a lightweight policy reheating method that internalizes the exploratory effect of temperature into model parameters. Starting from an entropy-collapsed RL checkpoint, TS-OPSD constructs a self-teacher by applying high-temperature scaling to the model's own logits, then distills the resulting smoother distribution back into the student. This policy reheating requires no external teacher, privileged data, or additional inference cost. Experiments on Qwen3-4B-Base and Qwen3-8B-Base show that policy reheating yields a stronger initialization for continued RL than both standard continued RL and rollout-level temperature reheating. Further analyses show that TS-OPSD mainly reduces output sharpness while preserving intermediate representations, top candidate sets, and reasoning capability. These results suggest that entropy restoration can serve as a simple post-collapse intervention for extending reasoning-oriented RL.

Xuewei Yang, Jiachen Yu, Jie Wu +3

Tsinghua University

On-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningRL Post-Training
AskPDF
May 28, 2026

A Predictive Law for On-Policy Self-Distillation From World Feedback

Moving beyond simple scalar rewards toward richer world feedback is a natural path to more scalable RL post-training. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is a promising recent approach that uses arbitrary feedback as learning signal, yet its reliability compared to established methods, such as GRPO, remains unclear. We identify a strikingly consistent linear correlation between the initial student-self-teacher performance gap and the final performance improvement in OPSD. This relationship holds across context types and model families, providing a powerful predictive law for anticipating the outcome of an OPSD configuration without running the full training procedure. Interestingly, we show that this linear predictability holds with model scale, suggesting a potential basis for new empirical scaling laws on larger models with stronger in-context learning capabilities. In essence, our findings show that OPSD performance can be predicted and tuned before training, offering a principled way to incorporate world feedback as a first-class component of the post-training pipeline.

Tommy He, Jerome Sieber, Matteo Saponati

Tufa Labs, Zürich, Switzerland

On-Policy Self-DistillationRL Post-Training
AskPDF
May 27, 2026

Beyond Imitation: Reflective On-Policy Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) improves the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by providing dense token-level supervision for on-policy rollouts. However, existing OPSD methods often yield limited gains on complex reasoning tasks and suffer from severe training instability. We identify two key causes: conditioning the self-teacher on a complete verified solution encourages imitation of complete reference trajectories rather than extraction of transferable reasoning insights, while indiscriminate full-response distillation imposes superfluous supervision on already-valid reasoning prefixes. Together, these issues suppress reasoning diversity and contribute to late-stage mode collapse. We propose Reflective On-policy Self-Distillation (ROSD), which distills transferable reasoning insights rather than complete reference trajectories. For each erroneous rollout, a self-reflector contrasts it with a correct rollout from the same group to derive a corrective idea and identify the sentence containing the first reasoning error. The corrective idea provides the self-teacher with targeted guidance, while the diagnosed error boundary allows ROSD to mask out the distillation loss over the valid prefix and apply token-level distillation only from the first erroneous sentence onward. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks and model backbones show that ROSD consistently outperforms standard OPSD and reinforcement learning baselines, better preserves reasoning diversity, stabilizes training, and mitigates late-stage mode collapse. Code is available at https://github.com/ZiqiZhao1/ROSD.

Ziqi Zhao, Xinyu Ma, Liu Yang +6

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Baidu Inc. · Shandong University +1

On-Policy Self-DistillationLanguage Model DistillationMode CollapseLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
May 26, 2026

Restoring the Sweet Spot: Pass-Rate Weighted Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning

Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (SDPO) provides dense token-level credit assignment for reinforcement learning with large language models by leveraging the model's own feedback-conditioned predictions as a self-teacher. Unlike GRPO, however, whose group-relative advantage naturally concentrates learning on a sweet spot of intermediate-difficulty questions, SDPO's KL-based advantage lacks an implicit notion of difficulty awareness. We analyze this gap through the lens of GRPO's advantage normalization. Extending the learnability framework to normalized rewards, we show that normalization absorbs the variance term p(1−p)p(1-p), equalizing leading-order learnability across questions and leaving p(1−p)\sqrt{p(1-p)} as the sole residual scaling factor in the per-question gradient. This analysis yields a simple prescription: weight each question's SDPO loss by [p^(1−p^)]1/2[\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})]^{1/2}, resulting in SC-SDPO, a scale-consistent variant of SDPO. The proposed weights are obtained as a zero-cost byproduct of on-policy rollouts with batch-adaptive normalization, inducing an implicit curriculum that dynamically tracks the model's evolving competence. Experiments on scientific reasoning and tool-use benchmarks demonstrate that SC-SDPO consistently improves over SDPO, yielding gains of +3.2/+4.3 (mean@16/maj@16) on Qwen3-8B and +1.8/+3.0 on OLMo-3-7B, while preserving stable training dynamics throughout optimization.

Zehao Liu, Yuanpu Cao, Jinghui Chen +1

College of Information Sciences and Technology Pennsylvania State University

Reinforcement LearningOn-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningCurriculum RL
AskPDF
May 22, 2026

EDGE-OPD: Internalizing Privileged Context with Evidence Guided On-Policy Distillation

On-Policy Distillation (OPD) has gained wide attraction as an LLM post-training paradigm due to its effectiveness in improving capabilities without introducing model distribution drift, and consequently, regression in general tasks. On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) is an efficient use-case of OPD, which is appealing as it requires only a single model as a student and teacher, and it also has the benefit of providing privileged context that is a absent at inference time (e.g. a persona, a private fact, or a worked solution) to the teacher during the training process. The challenge in this approach is that the privileged information can change model behavior more than intended: it can modify reasoning, degrade general capabilities, and affect performance indicators like response length, style, or local token preferences. Consequently, OPSD may train the student on side effects rather than a desired, transferable behavior. In this paper, we study this problem in a rare-token/identity setting and propose EviDence GuidEd On-Policy Distillation (EDGE-OPD), a modification of OPSD with two distinct characteristics: a) it uses guided rollouts to inject privileged-context behavior to the student at sampling time, so that the rare target behavior is actually present in the on-policy data, and b) it applies an evidence mask: the student is updated only at token positions where the privileged context supports the sampled token, rather than on every token in the rollout. We empirically show that OPSD (and its variant RLSD, with and without a verifier) completely fail to learn a target identity, while the integration of guided rollouts allows them to succeed. Additionally, mask-region ablations show that the persona signal is localized to the positive-evidence tail, allows us to draw valuable insights about efficient knowledge transfer and preservation of general purpose capabilities.

Aristotelis Lazaridis, Dylan Bates, Aman Sharma +3

EdgeRunner AI

On-Policy Self-DistillationOn-Policy DistillationLearning Using Privileged InformationTeacher-Student Learning
AskPDF
May 21, 2026

Search-E1: Self-Distillation Drives Self-Evolution in Search-Augmented Reasoning

Post-training has become the dominant recipe for turning a language model into a competent search-augmented reasoning agent. A line of recent work pushes its performance further by adding elaborate machinery on top of this standard pipeline. These augmentations import external supervision from stronger external systems, attach auxiliary modules such as process reward models or retrospective critics, restructure the rollout itself with tree search or multi-stage curricula, or shape the reward with hand-crafted bonuses and penalties. Each addition delivers a measurable gain, but each also inflates the training pipeline and ties the recipe to resources or designs that may not always be available. We take a step back and ask whether any of this machinery is actually necessary, and propose Search-E1, a self-evolution method that lets a search-augmented agent improve through only vanilla GRPO interleaved with on-policy self-distillation (OPSD). After each GRPO round, the policy rolls out on its own training questions. A token-level forward KL objective then aligns the policy's inference-time distribution to its own distribution under a privileged context that exposes a more efficient sibling trajectory. Despite this simplicity, the procedure naturally provides dense per-step supervision. On seven QA benchmarks, Search-E1 reaches 0.440 average EM with Qwen2.5-3B, surpassing all open-source baselines at both scales. Code and complete version will be made public soon.

Zihan Liang, Yufei Ma, Ben Chen +4

Tool-Augmented Language Model AgentsOn-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningLLM Agent Self-ImprovementLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
May 21, 2026

Tailoring Teaching to Aptitude: Direction-Adaptive Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) is an emerging LLM post-training paradigm in which the model serves as its own teacher: conditioned on privileged information such as a reference trace or hint, the same policy provides dense token-level supervision on its own rollouts. However, recent studies show that OPSD degrades complex reasoning by suppressing predictive uncertainty, which supports exploration and hypothesis revision. Our token-level analysis shows that this failure arises from applying a uniform direction of teacher supervision across tokens with different uncertainty levels: conformity to the privileged self-teacher suppresses exploration at high entropy, while deviation from the teacher degrades step accuracy at low entropy. Accordingly, we propose Direction-Adaptive Self-Distillation (DASD), which reframes privileged self-distillation from uniform teacher imitation into entropy-routed directional supervision: high-entropy tokens are pushed away from the privileged teacher to preserve exploration, while low-entropy tokens are pulled toward the teacher to stabilize step-level execution. Across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, DASD achieves the best macro Avg@16 over strong RLVR and self-distillation baselines. Pass@kk, reasoning-health, and generalization analyses show that these average gains come from preserving exploration without sacrificing step-level execution.

Hongbin Zhang, Chaozheng Wang, Kehai Chen +4

Institute of Computing and Intelligence, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China · Keeta AI, Meituan, Beijing, China · Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, China

On-Policy Self-DistillationMathematical ReasoningSelf-DistillationTeacher-Student LearningLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
May 20, 2026

When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning

On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) trains a student on its own rollouts using a privileged teacher, but its standard objective weights all generated tokens equally, implicitly treating the privileged teacher target as equally reliable at every student-visited prefix. Existing entropy-based OPD methods relax this uniformity by modulating token-level supervision with teacher entropy, but high teacher entropy in reasoning has an ambiguous reliability meaning: it can reflect either non-viable uncertainty or benign solution diversity. To identify this phenomenon, we introduce a branch-viability diagnostic. Specifically, we record next-token alternatives from the privileged-answer teacher prompt, force each alternative after the student prompt plus its on-policy spine prefix, and test whether the resulting student-template continuation recovers the correct answer. On Qwen3-4B, we find that an oriented within-sequence position score is the strongest tested predictor of teacher-token reliability, reaching an area-under-ROC-curve (AUROC) of 0.83; local uncertainty scores are at most 0.57. Motivated by this trajectory-level structure, we propose Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation (PW-OPSD), which applies an increasing position weight while keeping the same student rollout, privileged teacher pass, and clipped forward-KL target as OPSD. In our comprehensive evaluations with different random seeds, the diagnostic-derived PW-OPSD improves AIME 2024 and AIME 2025 Avg@12 by +1.0 and +1.1 points, and a generalization evaluation on two larger-scale models from different families, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B and Olmo-3-7B-Think, also demonstrates consistent aggregate Avg@12 improvements. These results show that teacher-token reliability in reasoning distillation is trajectory-structured and can be utilized without additional teacher computation.

Xiaogeng Liu, Xinyan Wang, Yingzi Ma +2

1Johns Hopkins University · University of Wisconsin–Madison · 3Nanyang Technological University

CoT DistillationOn-Policy Self-DistillationMathematical ReasoningLanguage Model DistillationTeacher-Student LearningKnowledge Distillation
AskPDF
May 20, 2026

AVSD: Adaptive-View Self-Distillation by Balancing Consensus and Teacher-Specific Privileged Signals

Self-distillation enables language models to learn on-policy from their own trajectories by using the same model as both student and teacher, with the teacher being conditioned on privileged information unavailable to the student. Such information can come in different types or views, such as solutions, demonstrations, feedback, or final answers. This setup provides dense token-level feedback without relying on a separate external model, but creates a fundamental asymmetry: the teacher may rely on view-specific information that the student cannot access at inference time. Moreover, the best type of privileged information is often task-dependent, making it difficult to choose a single teacher view. In this work, we address both these challenges jointly by introducing AVSD (Adaptive-View Self-Distillation), a novel method of self-distillation with multiple privileged-information views, which reconstructs token-level supervision by separating stable cross-view consensus from view-specific residual signals. AVSD identifies the consensus signal shared across views, which provides a reliable update direction, and then selectively adds the view-specific residual signal to adjust the update magnitude when it both aligns with the consensus direction and remains proportionate to the consensus signal. Experiments on math competition benchmarks (AIME24, AIME25, and HMMT25) show that AVSD consistently outperforms both single-view self-distillation baselines and GRPO, achieving average Avg@8 gains of 3.1% and 2.2% over the strongest baselines on Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-4B, respectively. Moreover, on code-generation benchmarks (Codeforces, LiveCodeBench v6) using Qwen3-8B, AVSD outperforms the single-view self-distillation baseline by 2.4% on average.

Duy Nguyen, Hanqi Xiao, Archiki Prasad +7

UNC Chapel Hill · Capital One · The University of Texas at Austin

On-Policy Self-DistillationLanguage Model DistillationTeacher-Student LearningKnowledge Distillation
AskPDF
May 18, 2026

SD-Search: On-Policy Hindsight Self-Distillation for Search-Augmented Reasoning

Search-augmented reasoning agents interleave internal reasoning with calls to an external retriever, and their performance relies on the quality of each issued query. However, under outcome-reward reinforcement learning, every search decision in a rollout shares the same trajectory-level reward, leaving individual queries without step-specific credit. Recent process-supervision approaches address this gap by drawing step-level signals from outside the policy, relying either on a much larger teacher model, or on sub-question annotations produced by a stronger external system. In contrast, we propose SD-Search, which derives step-level supervision from the policy itself through on-policy hindsight self-distillation, requiring neither an external teacher nor additional annotations. In SD-Search, a single model plays two roles that differ only in conditioning: a student that sees only the context available at inference time, and a teacher that additionally conditions on a compact hindsight block summarizing the search queries and final outcomes of a group of rollouts sampled from the same question. Since the teacher knows how each rollout unfolded and which ones succeeded, its query distribution implicitly marks which decisions were worth making, and the student is trained to recover this behavior by minimizing the token-level Jensen--Shannon divergence to the teacher at search-query positions. This layers a dense, step-level signal on top of GRPO's coarse trajectory reward. Crucially, this signal is produced by the policy itself within the standard RL training loop, without external model inference, auxiliary annotation pipeline, or additional training stage.

Yufei Ma, Zihan Liang, Ben Chen +6

Kuaishou Technology

On-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningAgentic RAGRL Post-TrainingLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
May 14, 2026

Learning from Language Feedback via Variational Policy Distillation

Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) suffers from sparse outcome signals, creating severe exploration bottlenecks on complex reasoning tasks. Recent on-policy self-distillation methods attempt to address this by utilizing language feedback to generate dense, token-level supervision. However, these approaches rely on a fixed, passive teacher to interpret the feedback. As the student policy improves, the teacher's zero-shot assessment capabilities plateau, ultimately halting further learning. To overcome this, we propose Variational Policy Distillation (VPD), a framework that formalizes learning from language feedback as a Variational Expectation-Maximization (EM) problem. VPD co-evolves both policies: in the E-step, the teacher is actively refined on trajectory outcomes via an adaptive trust-region update, translating textual feedback into a dynamically improved target token distribution. In the M-step, the student internalizes this dense distributional guidance on its own on-policy rollouts. By continuously improving the teacher's ability to extract actionable signals from textual critique, VPD overcomes the limitations of passive distillation. Evaluated across diverse sources of diagnostic feedback on scientific reasoning and code generation tasks, VPD consistently outperforms both standard RLVR and existing self-distillation baselines. Finally, by stress-testing our framework on rigid mathematical reasoning and cold-start regimes, we illuminate the fundamental bounds of feedback-driven self-distillation compared to pure environment-driven RL.

Yang Li, Erik Nijkamp, Semih Yavuz +1

Salesforce AI Research

On-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningReinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
AskPDF
May 14, 2026

Reducing the Safety Tax in LLM Safety Alignment with On-Policy Self-Distillation

Safety alignment often improves robustness to harmful queries at the cost of reasoning ability, a tradeoff known as the safety tax. A common cause is distributional mismatch: supervised fine-tuning trains the target model on safety demonstrations produced by humans, external models, or fixed self-generated traces, rather than on trajectories sampled from its own policy. We identify off-policy training mismatch as a second source of this tax and study on-policy self-distillation for safety alignment, which we call OPSA. The model generates its own rollouts and receives dense per-token KL supervision from a frozen teacher copy of itself conditioned on a privileged safety context. Because this teacher must be safer than the sampled student trajectory, we introduce teacher flip rate: a criterion that measures how often a privileged context converts unsafe responses into safe ones. We use this signal to search for contexts that activate latent safety reasoning rather than merely elicit safe-looking demonstrations. Across two reasoning-model families and five model scales, OPSA achieves a stronger safety--reasoning tradeoff than off-policy self-distillation and external-teacher distillation under matched data and full-parameter fine-tuning, with the largest gains on smaller models (+8.85 points on R1-Distill-1.5B and +5.49 points on Qwen3-0.6B). The gains persist across training-set sizes and adaptive jailbreak evaluations. Token-level analyses further show that OPSA concentrates updates near early compliance-decision tokens, providing a mechanism for improving safety while preserving general reasoning.

Yu Fu, Longxuan Yu, Haz Sameen Shahgir +4

1UC Riverside · 2International Computer Science Institute · 3Microsoft,∗ +1

LLM AlignmentOn-Policy Self-DistillationLLM Safety AlignmentAdversarial Robustness of Language Models
AskPDF
May 13, 2026

Respecting Self-Uncertainty in On-Policy Self-Distillation for Efficient LLM Reasoning

On-policy self-distillation trains a reasoning model on its own rollouts while a teacher, often the same model conditioned on privileged context, provides dense token-level supervision. Existing objectives typically weight the teacher's token-level signal uniformly across a chain-of-thought sequence, despite substantial variation in the entropy of the teacher's predictive distribution. We propose EGRSD (Entropy-Guided Reinforced Self-Distillation), which unifies token-level updates through three signals: a reward-grounded direction, a teacher-student likelihood-ratio magnitude, and the proposed teacher-entropy confidence gate that down-weights high-entropy token positions while maintaining a nonzero lower bound on every token weight. We further introduce CL-EGRSD, a causal-lookahead variant that distinguishes sustained high-entropy spans from transient high-entropy positions whose following context rapidly becomes low entropy. Experiments with Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-8B in thinking mode show that EGRSD and CL-EGRSD advance the accuracy-length frontier among the compared trainable methods.

Junlong Ke, Zichen Wen, Weijia Li +2

2Tsinghua University · 1Shanghai Jiao Tong University · 3Shanghai AI Laboratory

On-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningUncertainty-Aware Knowledge DistillationKnowledge DistillationLLM Reasoning
AskPDF
May 12, 2026

From Generic Correlation to Input-Specific Credit in On-Policy Self Distillation

On-policy self-distillation has emerged as a promising paradigm for post-training language models, in which the model conditions on environment feedback to serve as its own teacher, providing dense token-level rewards without external teacher models or step-level annotations. Despite its empirical success, what this reward actually measures and what kind of credit it assigns remain unclear. Under a posterior-compatibility interpretation of feedback conditioning, standard in the implicit-reward literature, we show that the self-distillation token reward is a Bayesian filtering increment whose trajectory sum is exactly the pointwise mutual information between the response and the feedback given the input. This pMI can be raised by input-specific reasoning or by input-generic shortcuts, so we further decompose the teacher log-probability along the input axis. Based on this analysis, we propose CREDIT (Contrastive REward from DIsTillation), which isolates the input-specific component with a batch-contrastive baseline. At the sequence level, CREDIT is a teacher-side surrogate for a contrastive pMI objective that also penalizes responses remaining likely under unrelated inputs. Across coding, scientific reasoning, and tool-use benchmarks on two model families, CREDIT delivers the strongest aggregate performance at negligible additional compute.

Guobin Shen, Lei Huang, Xiang Cheng +4

Xiaohongshu Inc. · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Reinforcement LearningOn-Policy Self-DistillationToken-Level Credit AssignmentLanguage Model Post-TrainingContrastive RLMutual Information
AskPDF
May 12, 2026

Anti-Self-Distillation for Reasoning RL via Pointwise Mutual Information

On-policy self-distillation, where a student is pulled toward a copy of itself conditioned on privileged context (e.g., a verified solution or feedback), offers a promising direction for advancing reasoning capability without a stronger external teacher. Yet in math reasoning the gains are inconsistent, even when the same approach succeeds elsewhere. A pointwise mutual information analysis traces the failure to the privileged context itself: it inflates the teacher's confidence on tokens already implied by the solution (structural connectives, verifiable claims) and deflates it on deliberation tokens ("Wait", "Let", "Maybe") that drive multi-step search. We propose Anti-Self-Distillation (AntiSD), which ascends a divergence between student and teacher rather than descending it: this reverses the per-token sign and yields a naturally bounded advantage in one step. An entropy-triggered gate disables the term once the teacher entropy collapses, completing a drop-in replacement for default self-distillation. Across five models from 4B to 30B parameters on math reasoning benchmarks, AntiSD reaches the GRPO baseline's accuracy in 2 to 10x fewer training steps and improves final accuracy by up to 11.5 points. AntiSD opens a path to scalable self-improvement, where a language model bootstraps its own reasoning through its training signal.

Guobin Shen, Xiang Cheng, Chenxiao Zhao +4

1Xiaohongshu Inc. · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences

On-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningSelf-DistillationTeacher-Student LearningLLM Mathematical Reasoning
AskPDF
May 12, 2026

Adaptive Teacher Exposure for Self-Distillation in LLM Reasoning

On-policy self-distillation has become a strong recipe for LLM reasoning, where a privileged teacher supervises the student's own rollouts while conditioning on the reference solution. A design choice shared by nearly all such methods, however, has gone unquestioned: the teacher always sees the full reference reasoning. We argue that this default itself is part of the problem and identify a teacher-side exposure mismatch: when the teacher conditions on reasoning far beyond the student's current competence, the resulting token targets become too strong to absorb. A controlled fixed-exposure sweep makes this concrete on two fronts: 1) full exposure is not reliably the best choice, and 2) student-teacher mismatch grows monotonically as the teacher sees more privileged reasoning. This motivates treating teacher exposure not as a fixed hyperparameter but as a learnable training-time control variable. We therefore propose Adaptive Teacher Exposure for Self-Distillation (ATESD). ATESD models the reveal ratio with a lightweight Beta-policy controller conditioned on compact training-state statistics, and uses one sampled exposure for a short hold window of student updates. To make this exposure controller learnable, we optimize it with a discounted learning-progress reward that scores each held decision by its effect on the student's future improvement rather than its immediate loss change, addressing the delayed credit assignment induced by on-policy distillation. Experiments on AIME 24, AIME 25, and HMMT 25 across Qwen3-{1.7B, 4B, 8B} show that ATESD consistently outperforms competitive self-distillation and RL baselines, improving over OPSD by +0.95, +2.05, and +2.33 Average@12 points respectively, and establishing adaptive teacher exposure as an effective new axis for reasoning self-distillation.

Zihao Han, Tiangang Zhang, Huaibin Wang +1

ByteDance Douyin

Adaptive Knowledge DistillationOn-Policy Self-DistillationRL for Language Model ReasoningLanguage Model DistillationTeacher-Student LearningKnowledge Distillation
AskPDF
May 11, 2026

The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixes

On-policy distillation (OPD) and on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) have emerged as promising post-training methods for large language models, offering dense token-level supervision on trajectories sampled from the model's own policy. However, existing results on their effectiveness remain mixed: while OP(S)D has shown promise in system prompt and knowledge internalization, recent studies also report instability and degradation. In this work, we present a comprehensive empirical study of when OPD and OPSD work, when they fail, and why. We find that OPD on mathematical reasoning is highly sensitive to teacher choice and loss formulation, whereas OPSD fails in our tested settings due to test-time absence of instance-specific privileged information (PI). In contrast, OPSD is effective when PI represents a shared latent rule, such as a system prompt or alignment preference. We identify three failure mechanisms: (1) distribution mismatch between teacher and student caused by conditioning on student-generated prefixes, (2) optimization instability from biased TopK reverse-KL gradients, and (3) an OPSD-specific limitation where the student learns a PI-free policy that aggregates PI-conditioned teachers, which is insufficient when PI is instance-specific. We further show that stop-gradient TopK objectives, RLVR-adapted teachers, and SFT-stabilized students mitigate these failures.

Siqi Zhu, Xuyan Ye, Hongyu Lu +2

1UIUC · 2Renmin University of China · †Work done during an internship at UIUC. +1

On-Policy Self-DistillationOn-Policy DistillationLearning Using Privileged InformationTeacher-Student Learning
AskPDF
May 11, 2026

Unmasking On-Policy Distillation: Where It Helps, Where It Hurts, and Why

On-policy distillation offers dense, per-token supervision for training reasoning models; however, it remains unclear under which conditions this signal is beneficial and under which it is detrimental. Which teacher model should be used, and in the case of self-distillation, which specific context should serve as the supervisory signal? Does the optimal choice vary from one token to the next? At present, addressing these questions typically requires costly training runs whose aggregate performance metrics obscure the dynamics at the level of individual tokens. We introduce a training-free diagnostic framework that operates at the highest resolution: per token, per question, and per teacher. We derive an ideal per-node gradient defined as the parameter update that maximally increases the student's probability of success. We then develop a scalable targeted-rollout algorithm to estimate this gradient efficiently, even for long chains of intermediate thoughts. The gradient alignment score, defined as the cosine similarity between this ideal gradient and any given distillation gradient, quantifies the extent to which a particular configuration approximates the ideal signal. Across a range of self-distillation settings and external teacher models, we observe that distillation guidance exhibits substantially higher alignment with the ideal on incorrect rollouts than on correct ones, where the student already performs well and the teacher's signal tends to become noisy. Furthermore, we find that the optimal distillation context depends jointly on the student model's capacity and the target task, and that no single universally effective configuration emerges. These findings motivate the use of per-task, per-token diagnostic analyses for distillation.

Mohammadreza Armandpour, Fatih Ilhan, David Harrison +6

Apple

On-Policy Self-DistillationLanguage Model DistillationOn-Policy DistillationTeacher-Student LearningGradient Alignment
AskPDF