Optimal Transport
Overview
Optimal transport studies how probability mass can be moved between distributions at minimum cost, giving a geometric way to compare data even when samples do not correspond one-to-one. Wasserstein distances and transport maps describe this geometry, while Gromov–Wasserstein methods compare relational structure when data live in different spaces. Practical approaches include entropic regularization with Sinkhorn algorithms, sliced and low-rank approximations, and neural transport maps used in generative modeling, domain adaptation, and trajectory inference. A central challenge is balancing computational and statistical scalability with faithful transport, especially when choosing regularization or relaxing exact mass constraints.
Latest papers
289 papers48 papers in the last four weeks, up 17% on the four weeks before. 0.3% of all new papers.
Stability of the Monge Map in Semi-Dual Optimal Transport
Locality-aware Private Class Identification for Domain Adaptation with Extreme Label Shift
Optimal Transport Audio Distance with Learned Riemannian Ground Metrics
Reliable Modeling of Distribution Shifts via Displacement-Reshaped Optimal Transport
UniVer: A Unified Perspective for Multi-step and Multi-draft Speculative Decoding
Entropic Riemannian Neural Optimal Transport
Globally Solving Unbalanced Optimal Transport and Density Control for Gaussian Distributions
A Provably Convergent and Practical Algorithm for Gromov--Wasserstein Optimal Transport
Sampling-Based Control via Entropy-Regularized Optimal Transport
Analytic Bridge Diffusions for Controlled Path Generation
Data-Driven, Geometry-Aware Optimal-Transport Calibration of Flavor Tagger
Hyper Input Convex Neural Networks for Shape Constrained Learning and Optimal Transport
Block-Wise Differentiable Sinkhorn Attention: Tail-Refinement Gradients with a Gap-Aware Dustbin Bridge
dustbin\_block path as the same unit-target surrogate on an augmented support, so the adjoint schedule lifts to the single-active-dustbin path used in our TPU runs; this bridge is algebraic and does not claim a general KL-unbalanced or arbitrary-capacity gap model. We provide a local surrogate-bias bound, an a posteriori bias certificate, and a projective contraction certificate for strictly positive active blocks. On synthetic masked problems, the optimized kernel matches exact autodiff of the same centered surrogate to within --. On TPU v6e-8, a four-configuration Pfam screen completes end-to-end, and a promoted balanced run sustains roughly examples per second through a three-hour budget, reaching step . Held-out Pfam test shards improve reconstruction from to and sparse CE from to relative to step , with CE logged diagnostically rather than optimized directly; target-barycenter alignment metrics do not materially improve, and a deterministic diagonal reference remains stronger on those metrics.