Jun 1, 2026 · cs.CVJ/K move · Enter open · S save
Ahmad AlMughrabi, Farid Al-Areqi, David Fernández Gómez, Umair Haroon+3
1Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. · 4LogMeal, AIGecko Technologies S.L. · 2Grup de Tecnologies Interactives, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain. · 3Institut de Neuroci`encies, Barcelona.
Can a visually plausible food mesh be trusted to estimate the volume of consumed food? \method investigates this question using selected paired before- and after-consumption states from the MetaFood CVPR 2026 Continuous 3D Reconstruction While Eating Challenge. The submitted workflow follows a curated reconstruction protocol: SAM3 segments the food and plate regions; Hunyuan3D/SAM3D generates a dimensionless food mesh; the plate diameter provides the metric scale; the plate geometry is removed in Blender; and the remaining mesh is hole-filled, made watertight, and integrated to estimate volume. MoGe-2 is used only as an auxiliary cue for initial dish-diameter estimation when direct plate measurement is uncertain; it is not the primary scale source for the reported challenge result. \method ranks first, with an average Chamfer distance of 8.31 across 34 meshes using rigid ICP without scale correction. On 17 before- and after-pairs, it achieves 33.87% state-level volume MAPE and zero monotonicity violations, while consumed-volume MAPE remains 53.74%. The results show that surface reconstruction, metric scale, controlled mesh cleanup, watertight volume integration, and physical depletion consistency should be evaluated separately for dietary assessment. Source code and evaluation scripts will be available at \href{https://github.com/GCVCG/PerBite-CVPR-MetaFood-2026}{github.com/GCVCG/PerBite-CVPR-MetaFood-2026}.