Robotic Hand Design

This study investigates the kinematic role of palm degrees of freedom (DoF) in enhancing thumb opposability in a five-finger robotic hand. A hand model consisting of a five DoF thumb and four fingers with three to four DoF is analyzed, where palm motion is introduced between adjacent fingers. To quantitatively evaluate thumb-finger interaction, the overlap workspace volume is defined based on voxelized fingertip reachable regions. Seven cases are considered, including configurations with increased total DoF and configurations in which the total DoF is maintained by redistributing DoF from the fingers to the palm. The results show that palm DoF significantly improves opposability, particularly for the ring and little fingers, by repositioning their base locations rather than simply extending their reachable range. However, when the total DoF is constrained, redistributing DoF to the palm leads to trade-offs between overlap workspace expansion and kinematic redundancy. These findings indicate that palm DoF and finger DoF play distinct roles in hand kinematics and should be considered jointly in design. This study provides a quantitative framework for evaluating palm-induced opposability without relying on object or contact models and offers practical design guidelines for incorporating palm motion in robotic hands.

Evaluating the pinch capability of a robotic hand is important for understanding its functional dexterity. However, many existing grasp evaluation methods rely on object geometry or contact force models, which limits their applicability during the early stages of robotic hand design. This study proposes a kinematic evaluation method for analyzing pinch configurations of robotic hands based on interactions between fingertip workspaces. First, the reachable workspace of each fingertip is computed from the joint configurations of the fingers. Then, feasible pinch configurations are detected by evaluating the relationships between fingertip pairs. Since the proposed method does not require information about object geometry or contact force models, the pinch capability of a robotic hand can be evaluated solely based on its kinematic structure. In addition, analyses are performed on four different kinematic structures of the hand to investigate their impact on the pinch configurations. The proposed evaluation framework can serve as a useful tool for comparing different robotic hand designs and analyzing pinch capability during the design stage.

In the design stage of robotic hands, it is not straightforward to quantitatively evaluate the effect of phalanx length ratios on dexterity without defining specific objects or manipulation tasks. Therefore, this study presents a framework for optimizing the phalanx length ratios of a five-finger robotic hand based on potential dexterity within a kinematic structure. The proposed method employs global manipulability, workspace volume, overlap workspace volume, and fingertip sensitivity as evaluation metrics, and identifies optimal design configurations using a weighted objective function under given constraints. The reachable workspace is discretized using a voxel-based representation, and joint motions are discretized at uniform intervals for evaluation. The optimization is performed over design sets for both the thumb and the other fingers, and design combinations that do not generate overlap workspace are excluded. The results show that each phalanx does not contribute equally to the overall dexterity, and the factors influencing each phalanx are identified. In addition, it is observed that the selection of weighting coefficients does not necessarily lead to the direct maximization of individual performance metrics, due to the non-uniform distribution of evaluation measures within the design space. The proposed framework provides a systematic approach to analyze the trade-offs among reachability, dexterity, and controllability, and can serve as a practical guideline for the kinematic design of multi-fingered robotic hands.

High-DOF dexterous hands require compact actuation, rich sensing, and reliable thermal behavior, but conventional designs often occupy valuable in-hand space, increase end-effector mass, and suffer from heat accumulation near the hand. Remote tendon-driven actuation offers an alternative by relocating motors to the robot base or an external motor hub, thereby freeing the fingers and palm for additional degrees of freedom, sensing modules, and maintainable mechanical structures. This paper presents MM-Hand, a 21-DOF Multimodal Modular dexterous hand based on remote tendon-driven actuation. The hand integrates spring-return tendon-driven fingers, modular 3D-printed finger and palm structures, quick tendon connectors for maintenance, and a multimodal sensing system including joint angle sensors, tactile sensors, motor-side feedback, and in-palm stereo vision. We further analyze tendon-sheath length variation and friction loss to guide the design of the routing, motor hub, and closed-loop joint control. Experiments validate the transmission, output force, sensing, and control capability of the system. The fingertip force reaches 25N under a 1m remote sheath transmission, demonstrating practical load capacity despite long-distance tendon routing. Closed-loop joint-level experiments further evaluate command tracking with a static arm and during arm motion. These results show that MM-Hand provides a lightweight, sensor-rich, and maintainable hardware platform for dexterous manipulation research. To support the community, all hardware designs and software frameworks are made fully open-source at https://mmlab.hk/research/MM-Hand.

We introduce CRAFT hand, a tendon-driven anthropomorphic hand with hybrid hard-soft compliance for contact-rich manipulation. The design is based on a simple idea: contact is not uniform across the hand. Impacts concentrate at joints, while links carry most of the load. CRAFT places soft material at joints and keeps links rigid, and uses rollingcontact joint surfaces to keep flexion on repeatable motion paths. Fifteen motors mounted on the fingers drive the hand through tendons, keeping the form factor compact and the fingers light. In structural tests, CRAFT improves strength and endurance while maintaining comparable repeatability. In teleoperation, CRAFT improves handling of fragile and low-friction items, and the hand covers 33/33 grasps in the Feix taxonomy. The full design costs under $600 and will be released open-source with visionbased teleoperation and simulation integration. Project page: http://craft-hand.github.io/

Dexterous manipulation is limited by both control and design, without consensus as to what makes manipulators best for performing dexterous tasks. This raises a fundamental challenge: how should we design and control robot manipulators that are optimized for dexterity? We present a co-design framework that learns task-specific hand morphology and complementary dexterous control policies. The framework supports 1) an expansive morphology search space including joint, finger, and palm generation, 2) scalable evaluation across the wide design space via morphology-conditioned cross-embodied control, and 3) real-world fabrication with accessible components. We evaluate the approach across multiple dexterous tasks, including in-hand rotation with simulation and real deployment. Our framework enables an end-to-end pipeline that can design, train, fabricate, and deploy a new robotic hand in under 24 hours. The full framework and generated robot hands are open-sourced and available on our website.

Dexterous robotic hands perform complex, contact-rich manipulation. Imitation learning provides a route to such skills, but collecting human demonstrations with accurate hand actions and rich tactile information remains a key bottleneck. We present MILE, a teleoperation-based data-collection system comprising the wearable MILE exoskeleton and the mechanically corresponding MILE-Tac robotic hand. Because human-hand anatomy and wearability place tighter constraints on the high-DoF wearable, our human-first design begins with the MILE exoskeleton, equipped with custom modular joint encoders for accurate joint-angle acquisition. We then design the MILE-Tac robotic hand to share the exoskeleton's selected kinematic topology and joint-axis arrangement while satisfying robot-side implementation constraints, and equip its fingertips with compact visuotactile sensor modules. This correspondence enables direct exoskeleton-to-robot joint-space command transfer without online task-space inverse-kinematics retargeting. During teleoperation, the system synchronously records task-specific visual observations, four fingertip visuotactile streams, robot-hand proprioception, and exoskeleton-derived action commands. In a four-task teleoperation benchmark, MILE achieved a mean success rate of 76%, compared with 28% and 8% for glove-based and vision-based baselines, respectively. For downstream imitation learning, we trained paired ACT and DP policies with and without tactile input on MILE-collected demonstrations. The tactile-input variants achieved higher success rates in all paired evaluations.

Human manipulation skills represent a pinnacle of voluntary motor functions, requiring the coordination of many degrees of freedom and the processing of high-dimensional sensor input to achieve remarkable dexterity. Thus, this study investigates whether the human hand, with its associated biomechanical properties, sensors, and control mechanisms, is an ideal that should be strived for in robotics. Do robots need anthropomorphic hands? First, characteristics of the human hand in terms of biomechanics and perception are extracted to compare them with currently commercially available robotic hands. From this comparison, research questions are derived that connect manipulation system complexity to skill repertoire size and dexterity. These questions are addressed through a systematic literature review, analyzing the manipulation capabilities demonstrated in 125 papers published between 2019 and 2025. Although complex five-fingered hands are often considered the ultimate goal for robotic manipulators, they are not necessary for all tasks. Findings indicate that in-hand manipulation does not benefit from anthropomorphic hand design, as simpler mechanisms are sufficient; however, mechanism complexity correlates with the breadth of manipulation tasks a hand can perform. Sensor integration and intelligent manipulation strategies remain underexplored, which may be due to a misalignment with hand design: instead of replicating the number of fingers and degrees of freedom, focusing on robustness and softness would allow more intelligent control and learning to exploit environmental contacts and integrate more sensors. Finally, the article argues for standardized evaluation criteria to enable the systematic comparison of hand designs and manipulation systems.