Shared Autonomy

In shared autonomy, a critical tension arises when an automated assistant must choose between obeying a human's instruction and deliberately overriding it to prevent harm. This safety-critical behavior is known as intelligent disobedience. To formalize this dynamic, this paper introduces the Intelligent Disobedience Game (IDG), a sequential game-theoretic framework based on Stackelberg games that models the interaction between a human leader and an assistive follower operating under asymmetric information. It characterizes optimal strategies for both agents across multi-step scenarios, identifying strategic phenomena such as ``safety traps,'' where the system indefinitely avoids harm but fails to achieve the human's goal. The IDG provides a needed mathematical foundation that enables both the algorithmic development of agents that can learn safe non-compliance and the empirical study of how humans perceive and trust disobedient AI. The paper further translates the IDG into a shared control Multi-Agent Markov Decision Process representation, forming a compact computational testbed for training reinforcement learning agents.

Fine-grained, contact-rich teleoperation remains slow, error-prone, and unreliable in real-world manipulation tasks, even for experienced operators. Shared autonomy offers a promising way to improve performance by combining human intent with automated assistance, but learning effective assistance in simulation requires a faithful model of human behavior, which is difficult to obtain in practice. We propose a real-to-sim-to-real shared autonomy framework that augments human teleoperation with learned corrective behaviors, using a simple yet effective k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) human surrogate to model operator actions in simulation. The surrogate is fit from less than five minutes of real-world teleoperation data and enables stable training of a residual copilot policy with model-free reinforcement learning. The resulting copilot is deployed to assist human operators in real-world fine-grained manipulation tasks. Through simulation experiments and a user study with sixteen participants on industry-relevant tasks, including nut threading, gear meshing, and peg insertion, we show that our system improves task success for novice operators and execution efficiency for experienced operators compared to direct teleoperation and shared-autonomy baselines that rely on expert priors or behavioral-cloning pilots. In addition, copilot-assisted teleoperation produces higher-quality demonstrations for downstream imitation learning.

Background: Assistance robots have the potential to increase the independence of people who need daily care due to limited mobility or being wheelchair-bound. Current solutions of attaching robotic arms to motorized wheelchairs offer limited additional mobility at the cost of increased size and reduced wheelchair maneuverability. Methods: We present an on-demand quadrupedal assistance robot system controlled via a shared autonomy approach, which combines semi-autonomous task execution with human teleoperation. Due to the mobile nature of the system it can assist the operator whenever needed and perform autonomous tasks independently, without otherwise restricting their mobility. We automate pick-and-place tasks, as well as robot movement through the environment with semantic, collision-aware navigation. For teleoperation, we present a mouth-level joystick interface that enables an operator with reduced mobility to control the robot's end effector for precision manipulation. Results: We showcase our system in the Cybathlon 2024 Assistance Robot Race, and validate it in an at-home experimental setup, where we measure task completion times and user satisfaction. We find our system capable of assisting in a broad variety of tasks, including those that require dexterous manipulation. The user study confirms the intuition that increased robot autonomy alleviates the operator's mental load. Conclusions: We present a flexible system that has the potential to help people in wheelchairs maintain independence in everyday life by enabling them to solve mobile manipulation problems without external support. We achieve results comparable to previous state-of-the-art on subjective metrics while allowing for more autonomy of the operator and greater agility for manipulation.

In human-robot collaboration, shared autonomy enhances human performance through precise, intuitive support. Effective robotic assistance requires accurately inferring human intentions and understanding task structures to determine optimal support timing and methods. In this paper, we present SUBTA, a supported teleoperation system for bimanual assembly that couples learned intention estimation, scene-graph task planning, and context-dependent motion assists. We validate our approach through a user study (N=12) comparing standard teleoperation, motion-support only, and SUBTA. Linear mixed-effects analysis revealed that SUBTA significantly outperformed standard teleoperation in position accuracy (p<0.001, d=1.18) and orientation accuracy (p<0.001, d=1.75), while reducing mental demand (p=0.002, d=1.34). Post-experiment ratings indicate clearer, more trustworthy visual feedback and predictable interventions in SUBTA. The results demonstrate that SUBTA greatly improves both effectiveness and user experience in teleoperation.

This paper presents a shared-control rehabilitation policy for a custom 6-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) upper-limb robot that decomposes complex reaching tasks into decoupled spatial axes. The patient governs the primary reaching direction using binary commands, while the robot autonomously manages orthogonal corrective motions. Because traditional fixed-frequency control often induces trajectory oscillations due to variable inverse-kinematics execution times, an event-driven progression strategy is proposed. This architecture triggers subsequent control actions only when the end-effector enters an admission sphere centred on the immediate target waypoint, and was validated in a semi-virtual setup linking a physical pressure sensor to a MuJoCo simulation. To optimise human--robot co-adaptation safely and efficiently, this study introduces Dual Agent Multiple Model Reinforcement Learning (DAMMRL). This framework discretises decision characteristics: the human agent selects the admission sphere radius to reflect their inherent speed--accuracy trade-off, while the robot agent dynamically adjusts its 3D Cartesian step magnitudes to complement the user's cognitive state. Trained in simulation and deployed across mixed environments, this event-triggered DAMMRL approach effectively suppresses waypoint chatter, balances spatial precision with temporal efficiency, and significantly improves success rates in object acquisition tasks.

Shared autonomy blends operator intent with autonomous assistance. In cluttered environments, linear blending can produce unsafe commands even when each source is individually collision-free. Many existing approaches model obstacle avoidance through potentials or cost terms, which only enforce safety as a soft constraint. In contrast, safety-critical control requires hard guarantees. We investigate the use of control barrier functions (CBFs) at the inverse kinematics (IK) layer of shared autonomy, targeting post-blend safety while preserving task performance. Our approach is evaluated in simulation on representative cluttered environments and in a VR teleoperation study comparing pure teleoperation with shared autonomy. Across conditions, employing CBFs at the IK layer reduces violation time and increases minimum clearance while maintaining task performance. In the user study, participants reported higher perceived safety and trust, lower interference, and an overall preference for shared autonomy with our safety filter. Additional materials available at https://berkguler.github.io/barrierik.

Human-guided collaborative transport becomes interaction-critical when the operator can continue along a route segment that is not executable by the robot--payload system. In this regime, operator motion is not an exogenous reference: it simultaneously communicates a persistent route tendency and adapts to the robot's realized progress. A common modular formulation predicts one operator future from observation history, scores multiple robot proposals against that shared forecast, and then modifies the selected command for local feasibility. This can compare candidates under responses they would not induce and can condition prediction on an action that is never executed. We formulate local control over executable-action-indexed joint human--robot transitions and instantiate it in Consistent Action--Response Execution (CARE). Each nominal proposal or bounded alternative is first mapped to an executable action; that same action conditions the route-aligned operator-response prediction, the matched robot--operator rollout, and a fixed interaction utility for candidate selection. Bounded reciprocal refinement handles transient route--feasibility mismatch, whereas persistent progress loss replaces the nominal proposal with a progress-oriented recovery proposal while retaining the same downstream executable-action-conditioned evaluation. Across training and held-out maps, CARE preserves near-saturated performance when the indicated route remains locally usable and achieves the highest observed success and service availability when the operator can continue but the robot must detour. It also yields lower jerk-proxy values and measured controller latency than dynamic-window and Timed Elastic Band baselines. Factorial ablations distinguish reciprocal refinement from progress recovery, delayed-response tests probe temporal mismatch, and an indoor deployment demonstrates physical executability.

Imitation learning has shown promise in learning from large-scale real-world datasets. However, pretrained policies usually perform poorly without sufficient in-domain data. Besides, human-collected demonstrations entail substantial labour and tend to encompass mixed-quality data and redundant information. As a workaround, human-in-the-loop systems gather domain-specific data for policy post-training, and exploit closed-loop policy feedback to offer informative guidance, but usually require full-time human surveillance during policy rollout. In this work, we devise ARMADA, a multi-robot deployment and adaptation system with human-in-the-loop shared control, featuring an autonomous online failure detection method named FLOAT. Thanks to FLOAT, ARMADA enables paralleled policy rollout and requests human intervention only when necessary, significantly reducing reliance on human supervision. Hence, ARMADA enables efficient acquisition of in-domain data, and leads to more scalable deployment and faster adaptation to new scenarios. We evaluate the performance of ARMADA on four real-world tasks. FLOAT achieves nearly 95% accuracy on average, surpassing prior state-of-the-art failure detection approaches by over 20%. Besides, ARMADA manifests more than 4$\times$ increase in success rate and greater than 2$\times$ reduction in human intervention rate over multiple rounds of policy rollout and post-training, compared to previous human-in-the-loop learning methods.