Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

VLM: Vision-Language Model

Follow this topic Ask about this topic

Latest papers

23 papers3 papers in the last four weeks, against 2 the four weeks before. 0.0% of all new papers.

Oct 19, 2026

Holi-World: Building Holistic World Intelligence from Human-Ego Experience

Human egocentric experience offers a rich foundation for learning how the world is organized and how it changes through interaction. Realizing this potential at scale requires turning growing volumes of recordings into learning resources that connect scene structure, object semantics, and interaction histories across viewpoints and time, while reducing dependence on costly manual annotation. We introduce HOLI-WORLD, an integrated ecosystem connecting experience capture, world representation, automated data construction, model learning, and independent evaluation. To sup- port learning at scale, HOLIWORLD-Foundry combines complementary static and dynamic perception to automatically construct world records that connect persistent scene structure and evolving object states with interaction histories and supporting observations. HOLIWORLD-Data organizes these records from approximately 100 self-collected scenes into grounded learning resources, including approximately 80K QA pairs used to train HOLIWORLD-VL-4B. Independent human annotations of heldout recordings form HOLIWORLD-Bench, supporting evaluation of both annotation quality and learned spatial and temporal understanding. Experiments on ScanNet, ScanNet++, Aria Digital Twin, and HOLIWORLD-Bench demonstrate strong performance in static perception and dynamic tracking, while training on HOLIWORLD-Data substantially improves HOLIWORLD-VL-4B's spatial and temporal reasoning on HOLI- WORLD-Bench and EgoDynamic4D. HOLIWORLD provides a practical foundation for expanding learning resources from the continuous flow of human experience and advancing machine understanding of the dynamic world.

Hao Li, Xiyuan Zheng, Yuanyuan Gao +7

Ropedia · NTU · HKUST +1

Egocentric Video Understanding 4D Scene Understanding Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Oct 19, 2026

TIM: Temporal Decoupling with Iterative Mutual-Refinement Model for Longitudinal Radiology Report Generation

Automatic radiology report generation (RRG) aims to translate medical images into diagnostic text, reducing radiologists' workload and standardizing clinical documentation. Nonetheless, existing approaches mainly focus on single-timepoint analysis and fail to capture temporal disease evolution across longitudinal examinations. While recent longitudinal RRG (LRRG) approaches incorporate historical data, they often combine images from different time points within a single representation space, leading to blurred semantics and inconsistent temporal reasoning. In this work, we propose a Temporal Decoupling with Iterative Mutual-Refinement Model (TIM), a two-stage framework that explicitly decouples spatial pathology from temporal progression and iteratively refines reports through mutual feedback. Stage I performs temporal-decoupled representation learning, separating temporal evolution patterns from disease-specific features and generating radiology reports for both prior and current studies. Stage II introduces a mutual report refinement mechanism that identifies diagnostic inconsistencies within prior reports and iteratively rectifies both prior and current reports through error-sensitive feedback. Experiments on the Longitudinal-MIMIC dataset demonstrate that TIM surpasses existing single-image and longitudinal baselines, achieving new state-of-the-art performance across both language and clinical metrics. Code is available at https://github.com/yihengd/TIM.

Yiheng Dong, Yi Lin, Shilong Huang +2

Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China · HKUST, Hong Kong, China

Radiology Report Generation Radiology VLMs Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Oct 18, 2026

Think Visually Across Space and Time: Grounded Reasoning for Video Segmentation

Video Reasoning Segmentation (VRS) requires a model to identify an implicitly described target and predict its pixel-level mask trajectory, while resolving the spatial relations and temporal events that determine the answer. Text-only Chain-of-Thought (CoT) can explain a target choice without making the underlying visual references explicit, leaving a video reference gap between linguistic inference and the evidence distributed across frames. We introduce Temporal Chain of Video Primitives (TCoVP), a spatiotemporally grounded form of Video CoT that organizes query-relevant observations into a chronological reasoning chain. Each primitive associates an entity reference with temporal support and timestamped spatial evidence, and the chain interleaves these references with language to guide reasoning about which entity is relevant, when the queried event holds, and where its evidence appears. The selected target primitives then provide box prompts and temporal support for video mask prediction. We construct TCoVP-SFT-15k and TCoVP-RL-13k to learn this representation through supervised fine-tuning and chain-aligned reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments across five VRS benchmarks and three model backbones demonstrate the strong performance of TCoVP, highlighting the effectiveness of organizing spatial and temporal evidence within the reasoning process. All models and code will be publicly released. Project page: https://victor-wjw.github.io/TCoVP/

Junwei Wen, Deshui Miao, Guangming Lu +3

Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen · University of California at Merced · Pengcheng Laboratory +1

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs Video Object Segmentation CoT Reasoning

Sep 28, 2026

ActionLens: Diagnosing Spatial-Temporal Binding Failures in Vision-Language Models

Video-capable vision-language models score above 80% on popular benchmarks yet struggle with spatial-temporal binding: associating the right action with the right person at the right moment. We introduce ActionLens, a diagnostic benchmark of 6,701 multiple-choice video questions spanning five targeted diagnostics: transition detection, actor-specific identification, concurrent action binding, directed interaction reasoning, and gaze detection. Ground-truth answers are derived deterministically from 1.58 million per-second, per-person annotations. Fourteen rounds of human quality engineering raised answer clarity from 53% to above 90% human accuracy. Across 20 VLMs, the full-set leader scores 68.8%; on the human-reviewed subset, it scores 65.9% versus 91.0% for the pooled human reference. Gaze detection remains near chance against 89.6% human accuracy. On actor disambiguation, reference-interface controls show that relational descriptions recover 5.55--13.25 points over static coordinates, confirming a substantial numeric-parsing penalty; yet visual boxes still lead every model by 1.15--6.50 points, exposing a residual unboxed actor-resolution gap. A binding-trap analysis shows models systematically select the wrong actor's action. ActionLens provides diagnostic measurements of these distinct failure modes across model families and scales for direct comparison. We release all data, code, and evaluation scripts at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/lmms-eval-2276

Gueter Josmy Faure, Min-Hung Chen, Hao Ping Wang +3

National Taiwan University · NVIDIA

Video-Language Model Evaluation Temporal Video Understanding Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Sep 23, 2026

EgoTSR++: Egocentric Spatiotemporal Reasoning for Task Progress Understanding

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly in static visual understanding, yet remain unreliable when judging how an egocentric task is progressing. Given a task instruction and two visual observations, a model should determine which state is closer to the goal by analyzing task-relevant object configurations and spatial relations, rather than relying on timestamps or presentation order. This distinction is critical in manipulation, where retries, corrective actions, and temporary regressions make progress inherently non-monotonic. We introduce EgoTSR, a unified framework for diagnosing and improving order-robust task-progress understanding. First, SpatialLogic-Bench evaluates each physical state pair in both original and order-swapped presentations across short- and long-horizon settings, exposing whether a model follows task-state evidence or chronological shortcuts. Second, our data construction pipeline converts successful, approximately monotonic manipulation and first-person trajectories into bidirectional supervision; LongTag further preserves intermediate subtask structure for long-horizon comparison, while failure-aware data extend learning to regressions and recoveries. Third, a progressive CoT-to-Tag curriculum first supervises evidence-grounded interpretation of task-relevant state changes and then consolidates the comparison rule through scalable label-only training. Experiments reveal substantial input-order bias in representative VLMs. EgoTSR achieves 92.4% long-horizon accuracy with a 0.1-point forward-inverse Gap. Failure-aware supervision further improves accuracy on non-monotonic trajectories by 11.8 points and Recovery Accuracy by 11.2 points, while maintaining broad visual and spatial capabilities. These results establish goal-conditioned state comparison as an explicit formulation of egocentric spatiotemporal reasoning for task-progress understanding.

Xiaoda Yang, Can Wang, Yuxiang Liu +3

Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China · Qingdao University, Qingdao, China · Tianjin University, Tianjin, China +1

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs Spatiotemporal Reasoning Visual Spatial Reasoning VLMs for Robotics VLM Robustness

Sep 4, 2026

From Vision to Language: Investigating Causal Information Flow in Multimodal Decision-Making

Vision-Language Models are commonly evaluated through their final predictions, but understanding whether these decisions are grounded in visual evidence requires tracing how visual information contributes to language-based decisions. With this purpose in mind, we investigate cross-modal information flow in a video-based generative multiple-choice-like setting by applying a layer-wise causal intervention on video-text attention pathways. We target spatial, causal, and temporal visual reasoning. Our results show that visual information is mainly integrated while the model processes the candidate answer options, which serve as the primary textual grounding sites for the final decision. We further show that nouns play an important role as semantic anchors during multimodal enrichment, while verbs are more relevant when temporal relations are processed. Finally, we identify a distinct pattern in temporal reasoning, suggesting that VLMs struggle to reconstruct sequential information across video frames, but we remark that such fragility may also reflect linguistic biases associated with specific temporal expressions used for defining the relation between events within a scene.

Davide Testa, Hugh Mee Wong, Alessandro Lenci +2

Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK) - Trento, Italy · Università di Roma La Sapienza - Rome, Italy · Utrecht University - Utrecht, The Netherlands +1

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs Vision-Language Models VLM Reasoning VLM Interpretability

Aug 24, 2026

What's the Catch? Evaluating Temporal Consistency in Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on video and image-sequence benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they capture temporal structure. To study this question, we formulate temporal grounding as an anomaly detection problem, providing a simple and controlled evaluation that directly tests sensitivity to temporal consistency. We introduce TimeCatch, where temporal anomalies are created by swapping consecutive frames and frame-level anomalies by replacing a frame with Gaussian noise. Models are evaluated on anomaly detection and localization tasks across four synthetic and real-world datasets, alongside a human study. Our evaluation reveals a substantial gap between frame-level and temporal anomaly detection. While VLMs consistently detect frame-level anomalies and often localize them accurately, under our main evaluation setting they generally perform near chance on temporal anomaly detection and show limited localization performance. Humans, in contrast, achieve near-ceiling performance on both tasks. Additional analyses across model scales, prompting strategies, sequence lengths, and visual similarity show that performance can improve under some conditions, while substantial gaps in temporal anomaly detection and localization remain. Together, these findings reveal a gap between frame-level and temporal anomaly detection. TimeCatch provides a controlled benchmark for evaluating temporal consistency in vision-language models.

Marek Hradil, Danae Sánchez Villegas

University of Copenhagen · The National Center for AI in Society (CAISA)

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs VLM Evaluation Temporal Video Understanding Video Anomaly Detection

Aug 17, 2026

RISE: Roadside Infrastructure Sequence Understanding across 3D Tracking and Structured Vision-Language Reasoning

We present RISE (Roadside Infrastructure Sequence Understanding and Evaluation), a framework spanning metric 3D tracking and structured vision-language reasoning in roadside sequences. For metric tracking, our image-only method combines SAM3 video identities with calibration-guided mask agreement for multi-view identity association, recovering persistent 3D tracks without LiDAR or task-specific 3D training. Its calibration-conditioned geometry allows the procedure to be instantiated at different calibrated multi-camera intersections without layout-specific retraining. On 20 human-reviewed clips from six intersections, the generated tracks achieve 66.9 MOTA within the defined multi-view evaluation scope. For structured vision-language reasoning, a human-reviewed MLLM pipeline mines high-value clips and uses a constrained full-context Oracle to construct bbox-grounded predictive QA without exposing future evidence to evaluated models. The resulting RISE-VQA dataset contains 33,910 QA pairs from 557 clips across 16 intersections and 61 roadside views. Its intersection-held-out RISE-Bench evaluates semantic choices, coordinates, future boxes, and interaction sets with deterministic task-specific metrics. Experiments show consistent benefits from domain adaptation and generally from temporal context, while revealing persistent challenges in spatial grounding, future localization, and interaction reasoning.

Yanbo Jiang, Haotian Zheng, Jiahao Wang +10

School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University · TsingCloud

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs 3D MOT Autonomous Driving Benchmarks VLM Reasoning Video QA VLMs for Autonomous Driving

Aug 6, 2026

DynaPix: Can Vision-Language Models Identify the Exact Future?

Acting in a physical scene requires knowing its real later state, not a plausible one. Current evaluations often accept words or a realistic-looking image, so the predicted state is never checked against the true one. We introduce DynaPix (Dynamic Pixels), a benchmark that makes prediction checkable. Given a video clip that stops before a key event and a question about a later moment, a model must pick the true future image from close candidates or a large gallery. The scenes come from a physics simulator, so the correct image and its time are known exactly and the wrong options are deliberately similar. Models often succeed when a visible event marks the target moment, but are near chance when only elapsed time marks it. Gallery search is harder still, as the true image rarely ranks first. People handle the elapsed-time items well, so the difficulty lies with the models, not the questions. Training on scene accounts drawn from the simulator's true record, not a teacher's guess, repairs much of this but not the longer elapsed time case. DynaPix thus exposes a temporal-anchoring gap: models attach a prediction to an event far better than to time itself.

Thong Nguyen, Vinh-Hien Do, Quynh Vo +2

Centre for AI Research, VinUniversity · National University of Singapore

VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Models Video Prediction Temporal Video Understanding Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Aug 5, 2026

PhysMind: From Video to Executable Worlds for Training-Free Physical Reasoning

Reliable physical reasoning from video requires understanding how objects move, interact, and respond to interventions. Existing vision-language models (VLMs) often struggle to interpret these dynamics and reason reliably about future and counterfactual outcomes. We introduce PhysMind, a training-free agentic framework that constructs one reusable, question-agnostic executable world per video. PhysMind recovers a temporally consistent dynamic scene through object segmentation, mesh reconstruction, and 6D pose tracking, then fits analytic continuous-time dynamics and latent physical parameters without unrolling a time-stepped simulator. Given a question, it inspects, continues, or edits the world and answers from the resulting trajectories and interactions. Relative to direct chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning with the same VLM, PhysMind improves accuracy by 38.23 points on CLEVRER and 8.08 points on Physion++. On counterfactual questions, it exceeds the strongest evaluated VLM baseline, GPT-5.5, by 19.25 points.

Chen Yang, Shenxiang Zeng, Haoyang Zhao +6

1Tsinghua University · 2The University of Hong Kong

Counterfactual Reasoning Physical Reasoning in Video Embodied World Models Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Aug 2, 2026

STAR-VLM: Spatiotemporal Grounding Vision-Language Models for Motion and Velocity Estimation via Automotive Radar Supervision

Vision-language models (VLMs) are emerging as a key component of embodied intelligence, with growing applications in auto-labeling and end-to-end autonomous driving. However, existing approaches for improving spatiotemporal reasoning in VLMs often rely on complex preprocessing pipelines, expensive human annotations, or synthetic data, which limit scalability and introduce potential sim-to-real gaps. Moreover, although these methods have improved spatiotemporal understanding, they still lack strong metric reasoning capabilities for dynamic scenes, such as estimating object motion in real-world units. Prior work has explored LiDAR-based metric depth supervision to enhance spatial perception, but it does not directly address temporal reasoning. We introduce STAR-VLM, an automotive radar-supervised framework that enhances spatiotemporal VLMs with motion reasoning and metric velocity estimation for autonomous driving. Automotive radar is a low-cost and widely deployed sensor that provides complementary spatiotemporal supervision through range and Doppler measurements. By leveraging these measurements as label-free ground truth during training, STAR-VLM improves the metric spatiotemporal reasoning ability of VLMs. Through experiments on driving scenarios, we show that STAR-VLM achieves state-of-the-art performance on both motion classification and metric velocity estimation, outperforming even task-specific methods designed for each task. These results highlight automotive radar as a scalable and cost-effective source of supervision for building metric-aware spatiotemporal VLMs for real-world autonomous driving.

Pou-Chun Kung, Aryaman Rao, Utkrisht Sahai +4

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

VLMs for Autonomous Driving VLM Reasoning Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Jun 26, 2026

Animation2Code: Evaluating Temporal Visual Reasoning in Video-to-Code Generation

While recent vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved significant improvements on static visual-to-code tasks such as generating code for webpages, charts, or SVGs, it remains unclear whether they can recover temporal dynamics when motion is present. To this end, we introduce Animation2Code, a benchmark for evaluating temporal visual reasoning via reconstructing executable web animation code from videos. Animation2Code consists of 1,069 web animation videos with diverse visual appearances and motion patterns, paired with corresponding HTML/CSS/JavaScript implementations. We propose two human-aligned metrics, appearance similarity and temporal similarity, which allow us to disentangle visual fidelity from temporal alignment when comparing rendered animations against ground-truth samples. Benchmarking state-of-the-art VLMs on this dataset shows that current VLMs struggle to maintain temporal consistency in reconstruction, even when achieving high appearance similarity, including under finetuning and iterative refinement settings. Code and data are available at https://anya-ji.github.io/animation2code-website .

Anya Ji, Abhijith Varma Mudunuri, David M. Chan +1

University of California, Berkeley

VLM Evaluation Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Jun 15, 2026

Chronological Blindness: Benchmarking Temporal Reasoning in Vision-Language Models with CHRONOSIGHT

Human perception of visual scenes is inherently temporal. We instinctively recognise whether a fruit is ripening or rotting, whether construction is progressing or being demolished, and approximately how much time separates two photographs of the same subject. Whether large vision-language models (VLMs) share this competence remains an open and practically important question. We introduce CHRONOSIGHT, a rigorously controlled benchmark evaluating five dimensions of visual temporal reasoning: CHRONORANK (chronological ordering of image sequences), CHRONOLOCATE (ordinal stage localisation from a single image), CHRONODELTA (estimation of time elapsed between two images on a logarithmic scale), CHRONOREVERSE (detection of temporally reversed sequences), and CHRONOODD (identification of a temporal outlier within a set). The benchmark comprises 1{,}000 items across eight process families (biological growth, food transformation, physical weathering, construction, environmental change, human ageing, astronomical phenomena, and urban dynamics) spanning timescales from minutes to millennia. We evaluate eight open-source VLMs (500 M to 19 B parameters) under two prompting regimes and collect human performance baselines. Human performance averages 0.89 across tasks; the best open model (Qwen2.5-VL-7B) reaches 0.40 under direct prompting, a gap we term chronological blindness. Lightweight LoRA fine-tuning on 151 examples raises CHRONODELTA accuracy from near-zero to 0.43, transferring zero-shot to related tasks (CHRONOODD: 0.37; CHRONOREVERSE: 0.64)suggesting the bottleneck is partly instruction following rather than visual perception. Benchmark, code, and predictions will be released upon acceptance.

Parthaw Goswami, Jaynto Goswami Deep

Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, 65201, MO, USA · SAP, Prague, Czech Republic

VLM Evaluation Temporal Reasoning VLM Reasoning Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

Jun 10, 2026

4DP-QA: Scalable QA for 4D Perception in Vision Language Models

Despite recent advances, Vision Language Models (VLMs) still struggle to grasp the dynamics of the world. We note that the ability to reason about a 4D scene, challenging in itself, is further complicated by two factors. First, VLMs observe motion indirectly via its projection onto 2D images. Second, existing datasets fail to disentangle object and camera motion. To address these challenges, we present a QA generation pipeline that focuses on motion-related scene understanding. We take particular care of the entanglement of camera and object motion by casting tracking in both the traditional way and in a novel, fixed reference system, dubbed True-Motion Tracking, which provides an intuitive description of motion. From this pipeline, we generate a large-scale training dataset of 400K samples, 4DP-QA (4D Perception QA), and a 2.2K-sample benchmark, 4DP-QA-Bench. Training existing models on our dataset yields performance improvements on an external benchmark, validating the effectiveness of our method.

Seokju Cho, Abhishek Badki, Hang Su +5

1NVIDIA · 2Yale University · *Work done during internship at NVIDIA. +1

VLM Evaluation VLM Reasoning 4D Scene Understanding Temporal Video Understanding Temporal Reasoning in VLMs Camera Motion Understanding

Jun 4, 2026

Seeing Time: Benchmarking Chronological Reasoning and Shortcut Biases in Vision-Language Models

Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have significantly enhanced their ability to interpret complex visual semantics, yet their capacity for chronological reasoning remains under-explored. In this paper, we introduce a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate how VLMs perceive and reason about chronological information within and across images. Unlike existing video-based benchmarks that focus on frame sequencing, our work delves into the underlying logic of chronological judgment and the expansion toward multimodal integration. To facilitate this, we construct three specialized datasets: one containing visually similar objects spanning long historical durations, another categorized by diverse event and object types, and a third pairing images with time-sensitive news text for cross-modal alignment. Through extensive experiments, we analyze whether models exhibit performance disparities across categories and, crucially, explore whether they rely on ``incorrect shortcuts'', such as image color rather than genuine chronological features. Our results reveal that while VLMs show promise, they frequently exploit superficial cues like grayscale versus color filters to bypass authentic chronological reasoning. By providing these high-quality datasets and a rigorous evaluation framework, we offer a diagnostic tool to identify current limitations and guide the development of more robust, logically grounded multimodal models. The source code is shown in https://github.com/LuoRenqiang/ChronoVision.

Haoyu Zhou, Qing Qing, Caichong Li +6

College of Computer Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China · College of Computing and Data Science, Nanyang Technological University, 639798, Singapore · School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China +1

VLM Evaluation Vision-Language Models VLM Reasoning Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

May 22, 2026

DRIVESPATIAL: A Benchmark for Spatiotemporal Intelligence in VLMs for Autonomous Driving

Spatiotemporal intelligence in autonomous driving (AD) requires an agent to integrate multi-view observations into a coherent scene representation, maintain object continuity across viewpoints and time, and reason about spatial relations, interactions, and future dynamics. However, existing AD vision-language benchmarks largely focus on single-view, static, ego-centric, or single-source question answering, leaving it unclear whether current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can truly construct and reason over dynamic driving scenes. We introduce DriveSpatial, a benchmark of 15.6K human-verified QA pairs across 20 tasks from five large-scale AD datasets. DriveSpatial evaluates four abilities: Cognitive Scene Construction, Multi-view Relational Understanding, Temporal Reasoning, and Generalization. Unlike prior benchmarks, DriveSpatial is generated from a dynamic multi-relational scene graph that encodes object states, spatial relations, interactions, camera visibility, and temporal correspondences, enabling QA pairs that enforce genuine cross-view and spatiotemporal reasoning. Evaluating 15 representative VLMs reveals a substantial human-model gap: the strongest model trails humans by 28.4 points, with Cognitive Scene Construction emerging as the key bottleneck. Further diagnostics show that language-only prompting is insufficient, while explicit BEV grounding consistently improves performance. These results suggest that current VLMs lack the scene-construction ability needed for reliable spatiotemporal driving intelligence. DriveSpatial and its construction pipeline will be released to support future research.

Hao Vo, Khoa Vo, Phu Loc Nguyen +10

University of Arkansas, USA · Google Research, Google · University of Liverpool, UK +1

VLM Evaluation Autonomous Driving Datasets Autonomous Driving Benchmarks Vision-Language Models VLMs for Autonomous Driving Autonomous Driving Perception+3

May 14, 2026

On the Cultural Anachronism and Temporal Reasoning in Vision Language Models

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to cultural heritage materials, from digital archives to educational platforms. This work identifies a fundamental issue in how these models interpret historical artifacts. We define this phenomenon as cultural anachronism, the tendency to misinterpret historical objects using temporally inappropriate concepts, materials, or cultural frameworks. To quantify this phenomenon, we introduce the Temporal Anachronism Benchmark for Vision-Language Models (TAB-VLM), a dataset of 600 questions across six categories, designed to evaluate temporal reasoning on 1,600 Indian cultural artifacts spanning prehistoric to modern periods. Systematic evaluations of ten state-of-the-art models reveal significant deficiencies on our benchmark, and even the best model (GPT-5.2) achieves only 58.7% overall accuracy. The performance gap persists across varying architectures and scales, suggesting that cultural anachronism represents a significant limitation in visual AI systems, regardless of model size. These findings highlight the disparity between current VLM capabilities and the requirements for accurately interpreting cultural heritage materials, particularly for non-Western visual cultures underrepresented in training data. Our benchmark provides a foundation for enhancing temporal cognition in multimodal AI systems that interact with historical artifacts. The dataset and code are available in our project page.

Mukul Ranjan, Prince Jha, Khushboo Kumari +1

MBZUAI, UAE · Inception, UAE

VLM Evaluation VLM Reasoning Cultural Heritage Temporal Reasoning in VLMs

May 8, 2026

Tracing the Arrow of Time: Diagnosing Temporal Information Flow in Video-LLMs

The Arrow-of-Time (AoT) task, determining whether a video plays forward or backward by recognizing temporal irreversibility, is one humans solve with near-perfect accuracy, yet frontier Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) perform only modestly above chance. This gap raises a key question: do visual backbones fail to encode temporal information, or does information bottleneck lie elsewhere in the Video-LLM architecture? We address this question by isolating the vision encoder from the Video-LLM and tracing temporal information across the encoder, projector, and LLM. We find that video-centric encoders with explicit temporal modeling encode strong temporal signals, whereas frame-centric encoders do not. However, when video-centric representations are passed through a standard Video-LLM architecture, performance often collapses, revealing a bottleneck of temporal information flow. We identify projector design as a key factor: Q-Former disrupts temporal information, while a time-preserved MLP projection substantially improves the LLM's access to such information. Our layer-wise analysis further shows temporal representation dynamics across encoder layers. Guided by these findings, we build a Video-LLM with temporal-aware video-centric encoder, time-preserved projector, and AoT supervision, surpassing human performance on AoT

_{PPB}

with 98.1% accuracy, and improving broader temporal reasoning tasks by up to 6.0 points on VITATECS-Direction and 1.3 points on TVBench. Our results show that temporal reasoning in Video-LLMs requires both effective temporal encoding and reliable transfer of this information to the LLM.

Peitao Han, Fei Cheng, Lis K. Pereira +2

The University of Osaka · Center for Information and Neural Networks · National Institute of Information and Communications Technology +2

Video-Language Models Temporal Reasoning in Language Models Video Reasoning Temporal Video Understanding Vision-Language Models Temporal Reasoning in VLMs+1

Apr 25, 2026

PushupBench: Your VLM is not good at counting pushups

Large vision-language models (VLMs) can recognize what happens in video but fail to count how many times. We introduce PushupBench, 446 long-form clips (avg. 36.7s) for evaluating repetition counting. The best frontier model achieves 42.1% exact accuracy; open-source 4B models score

\sim

6%, matching supervised baselines. We show that accuracy alone misleads -- weaker models exploit the modal count rather than reason temporally. Fine-tuning on counting with 1k samples transfers to general video understanding: MVBench (+2.15), PerceptionTest (+1.88), TVBench (+4.54), suggesting counting is a proxy for broader temporal reasoning.PushupBench incorporated in lmms-eval (https://github.com/EvolvingLMMs-Lab/lmms-eval/pull/1262) and hosted on (pushupbench.com/)

Shengzhi Li, Jiarun Chen, Karun Sharma +2

Multimodal Understanding Video-Language Model Evaluation Large Vision-Language Models VLM Evaluation Temporal Video Understanding Video Foundation Models+1

Apr 8, 2026

How Well Do Vision-Language Models Understand Sequential Driving Scenes? A Sensitivity Study

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly proposed for autonomous driving tasks, yet their performance on sequential driving scenes remains poorly characterized, particularly regarding how input configurations affect their capabilities. We introduce VENUSS (VLM Evaluation oN Understanding Sequential Scenes), a framework for systematic sensitivity analysis of VLM performance on sequential driving scenes, establishing baselines for future research. Building upon existing datasets, VENUSS extracts temporal sequences from driving videos, and generates structured evaluations across custom categories. By comparing 25+ existing VLMs across 2,600+ scenarios, we reveal how even top models achieve only 57% accuracy, not matching human performance under similar constraints (65%) and exposing significant capability gaps. Our analysis shows that VLMs excel with static object detection but struggle with understanding vehicle dynamics and temporal relations. VENUSS offers the first systematic sensitivity analysis of VLMs focused on how input image configurations - resolution, frame count, temporal intervals, spatial layouts, and presentation modes - affect performance on sequential driving scenes. Supplementary material available at https://TUM-AVS.github.io/VENUSS/.

Roberto Brusnicki, Mattia Piccinini, Johannes Betz

Professorship of Autonomous Vehicle Systems, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Visual Evidence Sensitivity in VLMs Temporal Reasoning in VLMs VLM Evaluation VLMs for Autonomous Driving Autonomous Driving Benchmarks

Mar 10, 2026

Probing the Reliability of Driving VLMs: From Inconsistent Responses to Grounded Temporal Reasoning

A reliable driving assistant should provide consistent responses based on temporally grounded reasoning derived from observed information. In this work, we investigate whether Vision-Language Models (VLMs), when applied as driving assistants, can response consistantly and understand how present observations shape future outcomes, or whether their outputs merely reflect patterns memorized during training without temporally grounded reasoning. While recent efforts have integrated VLMs into autonomous driving, prior studies typically emphasize scene understanding and instruction generation, implicitly assuming that strong visual interpretation naturally enables consistant future reasoning and thus ensures reliable decision-making, a claim we critically examine. We focus on two major challenges limiting VLM reliability in this setting: response inconsistency, where minor input perturbations yield different answers or, in some cases, responses degenerate toward near-random guessing, and limited temporal reasoning, in which models fail to reason and align sequential events from current observations, often resulting in incorrect or even contradictory responses. Moreover, we find that models with strong visual understanding do not necessarily perform best on tasks requiring temporal reasoning, indicating a tendency to over-rely on pretrained patterns rather than modeling temporal dynamics. To address these issues, we adopt existing evaluation methods and introduce FutureVQA, a human-annotated benchmark dataset specifically designed to assess future scene reasoning. In addition, we propose a simple yet effective self-supervised tuning approach with chain-of-thought reasoning that improves both consistency and temporal reasoning without requiring temporal labels.

Chun-Peng Chang, Chen-Yu Wang, Holger Caesar +1

DFKI Augmented Vision · TU Delft

PEFT of VLMs Temporal Reasoning in VLMs VLMs for Autonomous Driving VLM Reasoning VLM Robustness

Feb 28, 2026

ReMoT: Reinforcement Learning with Motion Contrast Triplets

We present ReMoT, a unified training paradigm to systematically address the fundamental shortcomings of VLMs in spatio-temporal consistency -- a critical failure point in navigation, robotics, and autonomous driving. ReMoT integrates two core components: (1) A rule-based automatic framework that generates ReMoT-16K, a large-scale (16.5K triplets) motion-contrast dataset derived from video meta-annotations, surpassing costly manual or model-based generation. (2) Group Relative Policy Optimization, which we empirically validate yields optimal performance and data efficiency for learning this contrastive reasoning, far exceeding standard Supervised Fine-Tuning. We also construct the first benchmark for fine-grained motion contrast triplets to measure a VLM's discrimination of subtle motion attributes (e.g., opposing directions). The resulting model achieves state-of-the-art performance on our new benchmark and multiple standard VLM benchmarks, culminating in a remarkable 25.1% performance leap on spatio-temporal reasoning tasks.

Cong Wan, Zeyu Guo, Jiangyang Li +5

Xi’an Jiaotong University · Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology · DAMO Academy, Alibaba Group

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs VLM Reasoning Temporal Video Understanding RL for VLMs

Feb 16, 2026

MATEO: A Multimodal Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning and Planning in LVLMs

AI agents need to plan to achieve complex goals that involve orchestrating perception, sub-goal decomposition, and execution. These plans consist of ordered steps structured according to a Temporal Execution Order (TEO, a directed acyclic graph that ensures each step executes only after its preconditions are satisfied. Existing research on foundational models' understanding of temporal execution is limited to automatically derived annotations, approximations of the TEO as a linear chain, or text-only inputs. To address this gap, we introduce MATEO (MultimodAl Temporal Execution Order), a benchmark designed to assess and improve the temporal reasoning abilities of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) required for real-world planning. We acquire a high-quality professional multimodal recipe corpus, authored through a standardized editorial process that decomposes instructions into discrete steps, each paired with corresponding images. We collect TEO annotations as graphs by designing and using a scalable crowdsourcing pipeline. Using MATEO, we evaluate six state-of-the-art LVLMs across model scales, varying language context, multimodal input structure, and fine-tuning strategies.

Gabriel Roccabruna, Olha Khomyn, Giuseppe Riccardi

Signals and Interactive Systems Lab, University of Trento, Italy

Temporal Reasoning in VLMs VLM Reasoning Multimodal Large Language Models Multimodal Reasoning